Author: LEXPEEPS editor

Adoption abroad, which is also called transnational adoption, describes the process of a couple or individual adopting a child from a different country, taking full responsibility for their care and maintenance the same way their natural parents did. A surge in international adoptions occurred during the Second World War. As a result of World War II, a large number of children was abandoned, the underdeveloped and developing countries were unable to provide them with a safe home. The idea of international adoption was born as a means of providing children with a healthy and safe environment where they could develop their full potential. In addition, the countries signed the Hague Convention for Protection of Women and Children to provide a framework for inter-country adoptions and to enable various laws in their respective countries to enforce such adoptions. It motivates many to go for adoption legally. Concerning international adoption and child protection, India has ratified the Hague Convention. Following that, India made several amendments to its inter-country adoption law. The adoption process has become more advanced over time regarding both intra-country adoption and international adoption.

Inter-country Adoption and Indian provisions

Inter-country adoption refers a social tradition, whereby, a baby born into one family becomes part of another through adoption, removing old biological lines and establishing new, socially approved ones.[i] In India, adoption was governed by the Hindu adoption and maintenance act, 1956, before The Hague Convention and it does not provide for international adoptions. Adoptions of juveniles and abandoned children are covered by the juvenile justice act 2000. In India, inter-country adoptions had been governed by the guardians’ act, 1890, which requires prospective adoptive parents to apply to the government for the appointment as guardians of the child. The proceeding of appointing a guardian was to be conducted before the district court, which is only authorized to pass an order if it is in the minor’s favour. Later on, a series of developments had made in the laws on transnational adoption, especially in India by the impact of Hague convention guidelines and also through various precedents.

Hague convention

As one of the leading organizations in the area of private international law, the Hague Conference on Private International Law drafted the “Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Co-operation” regarding International Adoption. The agreement entered into force on 1 May 1995, three years after it was signed on 29 May 1993. The Convention provides formal recognition of inter-county adoptions at the international and intergovernmental levels. The Hague Convention requires a central authority to regulate and control all inter-country adoptions and to serve as the principle for such inter-country adoptions. A subsidiary principle of the Hague Convention is that transnational adoption can only be employed when the children are at risk of abuse or neglect in their country of origin, and it is preferable to place the children locally whenever possible.[ii] Hague Convention Guidelines stipulate that the central authority responsible for adoptions should make sure that the child is of the right age and informed of the adoption and its consequences. A child’s consent is a crucial part and it must be reassured that it has not been obtained through duress or by compensation. The guideline emphasizes preserving the child’s origins, his medical history, and the true parents, but access can also be limited in exceptional circumstances. There are various guidelines provided by the convention to bring the uniform and standard set of rules regarding adoptions abroad to ensure the welfare of the child.

India and Hague convention

The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation of International Adoption is ratified by India which leads to the adoption of the same principles as the Hague Convention. For instance, the principles like establishing a system of cooperation between the contracting states to ensure the safeguards are adhered to before a transnational adoption occurs[iii]  were followed in India as well. An independent body under the Ministry of Women and Child Development was created and named “The central adoption resource authority (CARA)”. CARA examines transnational adoptions and establishes guidelines and frameworks with respect to adhering to The Hague Convention guidelines. CARA stipulates that any foreign couple wishing to adopt in India must be sponsored by a child welfare organization or social service agency that is recognized by the government. Inter-country adoption agencies should be affiliated with the respective state or union territory. The agency responsible for the placement of children under inter-country adoption is called a placement agency (PA) and all such agencies must be registered and recognized by the central adoption resource agency (CARA). CARA guidelines encourage intra-country adoption; however, a new guideline allows only three types of children to be adopted. They were abandoned, surrendered, and orphaned children under a legitimate agency. Even though there are various guidelines set up by the CARA with respect to the Hague convention, Judiciary plays a prominent role in dealing with the unspoken issues of inter-country adoption, especially in India.

Precedents and their guidelines

 Among the most prominent lawsuits relating to inter-country adoptions Lakshmi Kant Pandey v Union of India[iv] stays above all. After examining the inter-country adoption process in India, the Supreme Court issued guidelines for inter-country adoption. “Essentially, adoption is the best non-institutional way of rehabilitating a child. For a child to grow best he must be placed in his own culture; therefore, inter-country adoptions should only be considered as a last resort when all other efforts to place him in his country have failed and the child’s welfare demands. In both cases, whether it be adoption within the country or outside the country, the interest of the child shall always hold the utmost priority and all orders thus passed shall be paramount to the interest of the child”.  As a result of the guideline from the case Government of India establishes a regulatory agency, ‘CARA’ in 1989. Thus, the agency setup plays a key role in regulating inter-country adoptions, as well as all other adoption agencies across the country. The court further held that “It is preferable to place a child in international adoption before he or she reaches the age of three.” According to the Supreme Court, “The chances of a child becoming integrated into a foreign environment and culture are greater if he or she is adopted before the age of three”.

During the case of Craig Allen Coates v. State through the Indian Council for Child Welfare and Welfare Home for Children, [v] the SC Court observed that “no adoption can be approved unless clear and convincing reasons are provided for inter-country adoption and the Adoption Reform Act should enforce stricter guidelines on this point”. Here, the SC clearly points out that the motive behind the adoption will be considered as a prominent factor in allowing the adoption. It was brought with an idea to avoid child trafficking.

SC of India had also allowed direct adoption in certain cases. Taking into account the unique circumstances in the case of Mr. Tim Cecil v Unknown[vi], the court held that the Supreme Court of India permitted a direct adoption outside of any of the countries that had ratified the Hague Convention on Inter-Country Adoption.

In the recent case of Varsha Sanjay Shinde & anr. v. Society of Friends of the Sassoon Hospital and others[vii], it was held that once a couple has approved a child, the child cannot be shown to Indian parents, who simply because they are Indian Parents should be given preference over overseas Indians and foreign couples. Through all of these judgments, the Supreme Court makes it clear that the preference should be given to parents of Indian descent, even when adoption is inter-country so that the child can grow and prosper in its own culture and heritage.

Indian judiciary had timely taken effective steps in solving the procedural and also the substantial questions that had been unsolved by the guidelines. In all these cases the judiciary is given prominence to the welfare of the children. The welfare of the children post-adoption guidelines was framed by the judiciary and they play a vital role in resolving the latency issues that arise.

Conclusion

As stated in Lakshmikant Pandey’s case[viii] “Every child has a right to love and be loved, to grow up in a loving and caring environment, and to be protected from both material and moral evils, and only a family can provide this”. In India, inter-country adoption is a relatively new trend. Various amendments and actions have been taken by the government to ensure the enforcement of inter-country adoptions in India and to ensure adoptions in other countries are legal. The Supreme Court has also outlined rules that need to be followed while any inter-country adoption takes place. Where the adoption is based on love and care, many times it was misused. Child trafficking in inter-country adoption has been on the rise, and only a very few cases have been reported. It emphasizes the lack of laws and guidelines preventing such activities. Children are the treasure and they are needed to be protected.

---

[i] Soura subha ghosh, inter-country adoption procedure, supreme court guidelines- adoption laws in India, http://www.legalservicesindia.com/articles/adopt.htm, accessed on 24.07.2021

[ii] Hague Convention, Article 4

[iii] Hague Convention, Preamble and Article 1

[iv] 1984 AIR 469

[v] 162(2009) DLT 605

[vi] AIR 2011 MAD 247

[vii] 2014(5)ALLMR297

[viii] Ibid,4

This article is presented by Bharatee Preeya A.K., pursuing B.B.A.LL.B (hons) at Alliance University, Bangalore.

Edited by- Deeksha Arora

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WKtP

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

The National Judicial Academy provides national level judicial education to judges from across the country
and abroad; undertakes research into justice and judicial institutions; and to strengthen the administration of
justice. Established by the Supreme Court of India as an Autonomous Body chaired by the Hon’ble Chief
Justice of India, NJA is fully funded by the Government of India. NJA’s is located in a state-of-art world
class 62 acre campus located on a picturesque hill-top in the outskirts of Bhopal, overlooking Bhopal’s famous
lakes.

NJA seeks well qualified and hardworking candidates to fill a number of posts on deputation or
contract basis.

Applications, complete in all respect, should be received by NJA (in person/by post/by courier) in a sealed
cover addressed to: The Registrar(Administration), National Judicial Academy, Bhadbhada Road, Suraj
Nagar P.O., Bhopal- 462044 (M.P.) latest by 31.08.2021. The candidate should super scribe the name of the
post applied for on the top of envelop.

General Information:

a) The incumbents opting for deputation must send their application through proper channel
with ‘No Objection Certificate’ and CR Dossier/ Attested copies of the ACR/APAR of the
applicant for the last five years from the employer, with an advance copy to NJA. The terms
and conditions of the deputation service will be governed by Government of India’s Rules
applicable in this regard.

b) Age Limit : (i) Minimum age – 21 years
(ii) Upper age limit – for contract- upto 45 years, for deputation– upto 55 years
(Upper age limit shall be relaxed upto 5 years for the existing employees of NJA)

c) The cutoff date for determining age will be the closing date of application submission.

d) The applicant should submit application in the prescribed format along with self-attested
latest photograph and copies of testimonial in respect of educational qualification, date of
birth, experience, extra-curricular activities caste certificate etc. along with two self addressed envelopes (size 22 x 10 cm and with Rs.5/- postal stamp affixed). If applying for more than one post, separate application should be submitted for each post.

e) No TA/DA will be admissible to attend aptitude/ skill test/interview.

f) The Academy reserves its right to reject incomplete applications or applications received
after the due date.

g) The mode of selection for Group–A post will be either through aptitude/skill test and/or
interview to adjudge the candidates professional and practical ability. Only short listed
candidates will be called for aptitude/skill test.

h) The mode of selection for Group–C posts will be based on merit of the candidate in skill/
written test. Only short listed candidates will be called for skill/ written test.

i) The number of vacancy is subject to change and the Academy reserves the right to fill up
or not to fill up any or all the posts or to short-list the candidates in any grade based on
qualification and experience.

j) Interested candidates may download the application form from Academy website
www.nja.nic.in and send duly filled application in the prescribed format, super scribing the
name of the post, so as to reach in the office of the Registrar (Administration), National
Judicial Academy, Bhadbhada Road, PO Suraj Nagar, Bhopal- 462044 (M.P.) on or before
5.45 p.m. on 31.08.2021.

FOR MORE DETAILS VISIT-

http://www.nja.nic.in/Vacancies/2021/Employment%20Notice%20for%20the%20post%20of%20Manager(DCPR),%20Law%20Associate,%20Driver%20cum%20Attendant%20(13-07-2021).pdf

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WKtP

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Applications are invited from all eligible candidates for the post of ”Law Clerk
(Trainee)” in the establishment of High Court, Allahabad/Lucknow Bench carrying a
fixed honorarium of Rs. 15000/- per month with no Dearness Allowance and/or any
other allowances and also without any other perquisite such as residential
accommodation etc. The engagement shall be purely contractual based for a fixed term
of one year. However, the term may be terminated at any time, without any notice.
Number of Vacancies: 94
Essential Qualifications:

1. Three Years Professional/Five Years Integrated Degree in Law from any Law
   College or recognized University throughout the country. Applications shall be
   accepted from such ‘Law Graduates’ who have not started practice as an
   advocate or engaged in any other profession or vocation/service. Those who
   have appeared in LL.B. (Final Year) in 2020-21 Examination and are awaiting
   results may also apply. Law graduates having scored not less than 55% marks in
   their LL.B. examination are only eligible to apply for the post of Law Clerks
   (Trainee). They will be required to submit their final mark sheet of LL.B.
   Examination at the time of interview, which may be held in the month of
   September, 2021.
2. Computer knowledge, i.e., Data Entry, Word Processing and Computer
   Operations.
   Age Limit:
   The Candidates must have attained the minimum age of 21 years and must not
   have attained the age of more than 26 years as on 01.07.2021.
   Selection Procedure:
   For making selection, competence would be judged on the basis of interview
   only, which will be held only at Allahabad. The candidates for interview will be called
   only after screening. No T.A. will be payable for attending the interview.
   Nature of work:
   The successful candidates will be attached with Hon’ble Judges sitting at
   Allahabad and Lucknow Bench, Lucknow and shall discharge duties under directions of
   their Lordships. Basically, the Law Clerk (Trainee) will be required to carry out search
   and research on legal points and principles as desired by the Hon’ble Judge with whom
   he/she remains attached. He/she shall assist the Hon’ble Judge in searching out case
   law, articles, papers and other relevant material required by the Hon’ble Judges in
   discharge of judicial as well as administrative work. Besides attending the Chambers of
   Hon’ble Judges, the Law Clerk (Trainee) may also be asked to be present in Court
   during hearing of the arguments, take down or prepare notes in Court. The research
   work assigned to Law Clerk (Trainee) may include performing legal research, drafting
   memorandums and opinion, comments on statutes, relevant to questions of law.
   Assistance from the Law Clerk (Trainee) may also be taken in proper maintenance of
   the case files. Assistance in administrative functioning of the Judge shall also be
   desirable which shall include maintaining of administrative files, preparation of research
   of academic papers, maintaining record of judgments, the points of law decided in
   various judgments by a Judge, maintenance of records regarding administrative
   correspondence etc.
   Apart from the above mentioned duties and responsibilities enumerated above,
   the Law Clerk (Trainee) shall perform any other duty as assigned by the Judge
   concerned with regard to His judicial and administrative functions. The nomenclature
   ”Law Clerk (Trainee)” makes it abundantly clear that they shall be imparted training with
   regard to procedure and substantive law to assist the Hon’ble Judges in discharging
   their judicial and administrative functions. The Law Clerk (Trainee) will also be provided
   the schedule of training and the details of the nature of job, which they have to perform
   during their year of engagement. Specific assignments shall be given by the Hon’ble
   Judge with whom they are attached.
   Restriction on Practice:
   Law Clerk (Trainee), from the date of termination of his/her engagement as Law
   Clerk (Trainee) shall not appear in any case handled by the Hon’ble Judge(s) with
   whom he or she had attached, irrespective whether he/she had or not worked on that
   case during the period of his engagement. The candidates shall furnish an undertaking
   to the above effect on proforma prescribed herein after.
   Other Conditions of Engagement:
   The Law Clerks (Trainee) shall be governed by such rules of attendance, leave
   and other related matters as might be prescribed from time to time by Hon’ble
   Committee/Hon’ble the Chief Justice, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
   Period of Engagement:
   The engagement shall be for a fixed term of one year only from the first date
   fixed for joining, which may be terminated without notice at any time.
   Marital Status:
   A candidate having more than one spouse or married to such a person who
   already had a living legally wedded wife/husband, will not be eligible.
   Disqualification:
   (1) A candidate involved in any kind of criminal case whether convicted or
   charge-sheeted shall be barred from applying for the above post.
   (2) Those who have already worked as Law Clerk (Trainee) will not be eligible to
   apply again.
   How to Apply ?
3. The application forms can be purchased from the counter in the High Court
   Judicature at Allahabad and at it’s Lucknow Bench on payment of Rs. 300/- in
   cash. The applications forms are also available on the official web site of
   Allahabad High Court (www.allahabadhighcourt.in) and may be downloaded and
   used subject to payment of application form of Rs. 300/- to be paid through bank
   draft drawn in favour of Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
4. The application form along with one duly attested copy of High School Mark
   Sheet, High School Certificate in proof of age/date of birth, Intermediate Mark
   Sheet, Intermediate Pass Certificate, Graduation/Post Graduation Mark Sheets
   and Certificates and testimonials regarding Extra Curricular Activities and
   Computer Knowledge along with two self addressed envelope (size 5”x10”) each
   bearing postage stamps worth Rs. 40/- should be sent to the Registrar General,
   High Court of Judicature at Allahabad either by Speed Post, Registered Post with
   AD or through Courier.

Application Form-

file:///C:/Users/dell/Downloads/event_9663_26-07-2021.pdf

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WKtP

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

CASE NUMBER:

Suit number 597 of 1961

EQUIVALENT CITATION:

AIR 1964 CAL 239

BENCH:

Single judge bench, Judge Bijayesh Mukherji presiding.

DECIDED ON:

Friday, 10^th January 1964

RELEVANT ACT/SECTION:

1. Section 68 of the Partnership Act, 1932
2. Section 28 of the Partnership Act, 1932
3. Section 67 of Evidence Act, 1872
4. Section 114 A of Evidence Act, 1872
5. Order 14 of the Procedure Code

BRIEF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

Shree Hanuman Transport Company (hereafter referred to as Transport Company) was a firm involved in the shipment business. Snow White Food Product Company Ltd (hereafter referred to as Snow White) contracted the Transport Company for the shipment of two products, namely refined groundnut oil and Balloon brand vegetable product, to Raiganj and Islampur in the district of West Dinajpur. The said delivery was to take place on 20^th April 1960. According to the facts of the case presented, the Transport Company, for the benefit of Snow White, had insured the goods to be delivered with an insurance company bearing the name of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the Insurance Company). The complaint filed by Snow White Company claims that while the goods were in transit, the goods were tampered with and damaged by the partners of the Transport Company, namely Sohanlal Bagla and Madanlal Poddar, also the Insurance Company. The plaintiff claimed damages of sixteen thousand for the goods to be delivered to Islampur and a subsequent amount of rupees nine hundred and thirty-one for the goods to be transported to Raiganj. This comes to a total of rupees seventeen thousand five hundred and thirty-one. Out of this, the Transport Company had already paid the plaintiff rupees four thousand and five hundred. Snow White Food Product Company Ltd brought this suit to recover the remaining damages of Rs 13031.

ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT:

The issues in question before the Hon’ble Court were:

1. Whether Sohanlal Bagla (first defendant) was ever a partner of Shree Hanuman Transport Company (third defendant)?
2. Whether Shree Hanuman Transport Company had insured the goods delivered to Snow White Food Products Ltd. from the New India Assurance Co. Ltd for the plaintiff’s benefit (Snow White Food Products Ltd.)?
3. Whether the consignment called in question were damaged or converted to benefit their use by the defendants when the goods were in transit?
4. Whether New India Assurance Co. Ltd (fourth defendant) is liable to pay the amount of the claim to Snow White Food Products Ltd.?
5. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to any reliefs, and if so, then what reliefs must be granted?

RATIO OF THE CASE:

Sohanlal presented certain evidences before the Court sufficient enough to prove that he was not a partner of Shree Hanuman Transport Co. Ltd. To corroborate Sohanlal’s statements in the Register of firm’s entries, Madanlal Poddar and Babulal Saraogl were mentioned as the partners of the Transport Company. Against this evidence, Snow White put before the Court that although the terms on paper were maybe different, Sohanlal, through his various actions, has provided a reasonable reason for Snow White to believe him to be a partner of the Transport Company. It presented before the Court, evidence of official communication between Snow White and the Transport Company through letters signed by Sohanlal on behalf of the firm. Not only this but also the surveyor of the Insurance Company, on instructions from Sohanlal, had sold the damaged good to the highest bidder and returned the proceeds of the sale (Rs 11556) to Sohanlal. Thus, this gives reasonable reason for Snow White to believe him to be a partner of the Transport Company, making him liable to pay for the loss suffered due to the non-delivery of goods.

DECISION OF THE COURT:

After careful consideration of the facts of the said case and taking into account the pieces of evidence and witnesses presented, the Calcutta High Court concluded that Sohanlal had presented himself as a partner when dealings were taking place between the Transport Company and Snow White Food Product Company Ltd. He had also signed documents it the capacity of a partner and thus is qualified as a partner by holding out of the Transport Company. Therefore he was made liable to pay the remaining amount of the claim to Snow White Food Product Company Ltd.

This case analysis is provided by Debasmita Nandi, a first year law student at CHRIST (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), LAVASA.

Edited by- Deeksha Arora

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WKtP

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Case Number

CS (OS) 2011/2006

Equivalent Citation

(2016) 226 DLT 647

Coram 

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

Decided on

22 DECEMBER 2015

Relevant Act/ Section

SECTION 6 WITHIN THE HINDU SUCCESSION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2005

Background 

Before the enactment of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 women were considered physically and mentally inferior to men. The Indian patriarchal society disregards the Hindu women’s right to property and she or he is formed to suffer inequality and oppression. Women could hold only two sorts of property- Stridhan and Women’s Estate. Over which the feminine had meager powers only. Since they had no absolute powers and rights over the property and couldn’t acquire property from their father, they might not become Karta or play any role within the family property.  

On 9 September 2005, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force incorporating the reforms suggested within the 174th Report of the Law Commission of India. This amendment deleted section 4(2) of the act and paved the way for equal rights for girls. According to the newly amended provision, a lady by birth becomes a coparcener within the same manner as a son. The daughter now has equivalent rights and liabilities as a son. She fully enjoys the rights of the property of her father also as her in-laws.

Brief Facts and Procedural History

In this case, DR Gupta and his sons held a bungalow in Delhi and a few movable properties and shares on a long-term lease. On 1^st October 1971, Mr. DR Gupta died leaving behind him the five sons alongside their respective families. Mr. Kishan Mohan Gupta, the eldest son, became the Karta of the Hindu Undivided Family. At a later time, all the five sons of DR Gupta also died, and therefore the son of the younger brother of Kishan Gupta declared himself as the Karta of the HUF because he was the oldest living member of the said HUF.

The plaintiff challenged him by stating that after her father and her uncles, she is the senior-most member of HUF by the plaintiff, eldest daughter of Mr. Kishan Gupta. 

Arguments

• Arguments made by the plaintiff

Plaintiff contended that her being a lady can’t be the only reason for disqualification from being its Karta. She further contended that under the new provision, a daughter of a coparcener during a HUF, can enjoy rights to those enjoyed by a son of a coparcener.

• Arguments made by the defendant

The defendant objected to such claims and contended that the amended section 6 of HSA only grants daughters equal rights to be considered coparceners as those enjoyed by a male member and not extends to management of HUF property. He further argued that since the plaintiff has been married, she can’t be considered as a requisite part of HUF. 

Issues before the Court

Whether the eldest daughter amongst the coparceners of Hindu Undivided family, be entitled as Karta?

9 Cited Judgements

• Tribhuvan Das Haribhai Tamboli v. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal  

In this case, the Court held that Karta must be a senior-most member in a HUF.

• Raghunath Raj Bareja and Another v. Punjab National Bank and others
• Ram Belas Singh v. Uttam Singh and others
• Swedish Match AB v. Securities and Exchange Board, India
• Prakash Nath Khanna v. C.I.T.
• S.Sai Reddy v. S.Narayana Reddy and Ors 
• Badshah v. Urmila badshah Godse and another

The decision of the Court

The Delhi High Court held that while women would have equal rights in a HUF property, this right could not be curtailed when it comes to the management of the same property. The court further held that hurdles that prevented a women member of a HUF from becoming its Karta were that she did not have the necessary qualifications of Copartnership. Now, Under Hindu Succession Amendment Act, 2005, this deprivation has been deleted and there is no reason left that Hindu women should be denied the position of Karta in HUF. If the eldest son is often Karta, so can a female member.

Comments

In Prakash v. Phoolwati, the court held that the 2005 amendment will have the prospective effect which means that when the predecessor will die on or after 9 September 2005, then only women can claim to become Karta. But in the given case, the Court held that women have the right to become Karta, even though her father died before the introduction of the 2005 amendment. With due respect, the above judgment is patchy as it does not explain the actual position and role of Karta of HUF. The court only focussed on the proprietary rights and management aspect of the Karta, and other aspects like the socio-religious position of the Karta in HUF are neglected.  But this judgment will create a positive impact on society because it settles an equal place for women.

SITUATION ON GROUND 

Although the proper of being the Karta has been conferred abreast of the daughter, being the senior member of the family, through legislation and judicial pronouncements, she didn’t come to the fore to require up this responsibility. The family, where there are brothers notwithstanding younger than her, consider their sons to be more competent and hand over the responsibility of the family, by holding the title of the Karta. Most of the time Daughters are not even considered a member of their existing family but as a member of her husband’s family. Inconclusive words, the position of classic India or things before the amendment, persists in India Society.

Conclusion 

When the legislature passes the amendment act of 2005, it is very evident that they want to include female members of HUF to inherit Mitakshara co-coparcenary property. Due to unclarity in the provisions of the Amendment act and lack of awareness of the recent amendments, the discrimination continued even nowadays. But this judgment has clarified the legislature’s actual intent by including the management of the HUF property. Hopefully, it would assist in eliminating the gender discrimination, oppression, and negation of the fundamental right of equality of women guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. And over time, strengthen the position of women in the hierarchy of society.   

The case analysis has been done by Megha Patel, a 2^nd year Law Student at the Mody University of Science and Technology, Laxmangarh, Rajasthan.

The case analysis has been done by Shubham Yadav, a 4th-year law student from Banasthali Vidyapith.

Latest Posts

• Job opportunity at EXO Edge, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!
• Internship opportunity at Vishwas Advisors, Kalyan, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Internship opportunity at Kulfi Collective, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!
• Job opportunity at The Neotia University, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India: Apply Now !!
• Job opportunity at Morgan Stanley, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at VISA INTELLIGENCE CONSULTANCY LLP, New Delhi, Delhi, India: Apply Now!!  
• Job opportunity at Amazon Web Services (AWS), Gurugram, Haryana, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Stelcore Management Services Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Zscaler, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Irish Expert, Delhi, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at UnitedLex · Gurgaon, Haryana, India: Apply Now!
• Internship opportunity at Vineforce · Nabha, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!

---

• ACEDY (1)
• CLAT-Peeps! (10)
  • Current Affairs (2)
• competitions (132)
• Conferences and Seminars (201)
  • Webinar (1)
• Course and Workshops (107)
• Debates (46)
• DEGY (1)
• Eassy Competitions (69)
• Fellowships & Scholarships (56)
• Guest Blogs (6)
• important (29)
• Internships and Jobs (2,317)
• interviews (8)
• LEGY (1)
• moot court (180)
• Opportuintes (2,731)
  • Job Opportunity (1,191)
• opportunity (2,559)
  • Call for papers (475)
  • Quizes,fests and others (298)
  • Work Opportunity (836)
• Our Blog (1,049)
  • Administrative Law (17)
  • ADR (13)
  • Arms Act (2)
  • Case Analysis (205)
  • Company law (36)
  • Constitutional Law (143)
  • Consumer Protection Act (17)
  • Contract Law (62)
  • CPC (10)
  • Criminal Law (140)
  • Cyber Law (13)
  • Environmental Laws (30)
  • Evidence Act (20)
  • Family Law (12)
  • General (205)
  • International Humanitarian Law (8)
  • International law (23)
  • IPR (10)
  • Jurisprudence (13)
  • labor laws (7)
  • Maritime Laws (1)
  • Partnership Act (2)
  • personal law (33)
  • Taxation (10)
  • Tort (64)
  • Transfer of Property (2)
• Our Services (11)
  • career advice (2)
  • others (6)
• Top Stories (524)
• Uncategorized (720)

Archives

• November 2023 (26)
• October 2023 (1)
• September 2023 (5)
• August 2023 (2)
• July 2023 (25)
• June 2023 (23)
• May 2023 (40)
• April 2023 (136)
• March 2023 (124)
• February 2023 (138)
• January 2023 (61)
• December 2022 (39)
• November 2022 (103)
• October 2022 (178)
• September 2022 (342)
• August 2022 (240)
• July 2022 (273)
• June 2022 (196)
• May 2022 (27)
• April 2022 (99)
• March 2022 (190)
• February 2022 (196)
• January 2022 (193)
• December 2021 (152)
• November 2021 (203)
• October 2021 (189)
• September 2021 (177)
• August 2021 (192)
• July 2021 (393)
• June 2021 (293)
• May 2021 (179)
• April 2021 (61)
• March 2021 (46)
• February 2021 (56)
• January 2021 (63)
• December 2020 (86)
• November 2020 (94)
• October 2020 (146)
• September 2020 (220)
• August 2020 (173)
• July 2020 (165)
• June 2020 (119)
• May 2020 (136)
• April 2020 (7)
• February 2020 (37)
• January 2020 (3)
• November 2019 (1)

Introduction

Sedition laws were enacted in 17th Century England when legislators accepted that only positive opinions about the government ought to be expressed, as negative and coercive opinions were inconvenient to the public authority and government. 

The law was initially drafted in 1837 by Thomas Macaulay, a British history specialist. At first, Section 124A was not included in IPC when it was authorized in 1860. Sedition was, in this manner, made an offense in British India since the Government speculated on a Wahabi uprising. Wahabi movement was kind of a revivalist movement that tried to purify Islam by discarding the un-Islamic practices which were introduced into Muslim society through ages. The period of the movement can be marked from the 1820s to the 1870s. Accordingly, in 1870, Section 124A was added to Chapter VI of the IPC, which is dedicated to offenses against the State. 

Sedition is a crime under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) which says- ‘whoever by spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in India’ shall be punished with life imprisonment.

Three explanations added to the provisions recommend that while “disaffection” will incorporate disloyalty and all feelings of animosity, comments without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, won’t establish an offense. 

Remarkable Sedition Trials Of All Time: 

The penal provision proved to be useful to curb patriot voices and demands for freedom. The extensive rundown of India’s national heroes who were categorized as accused in cases of sedition includes Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Mahatma Gandhi, Bhagat Singh, and Jawaharlal Nehru.

The first among the nationalist was the trial of Jogendra Chandra Bose of 1891. Bose was the editor of the newspaper named Bongobasi. He wrote an article condemning the Age of Consent Bill for posing a threat to religion and for its negative influence on Indians.

Bal Gangadhar Tilak was the main individual to be convicted for sedition in British India. The British government brought the charge, alleging that the articles conveyed in Tilak’s Marathi paper Kesari would incite individuals to thwart the government endeavors for checking the plague epidemic in India. In 1897, Tilak was alleged by the Bombay high court for sedition under Section 124A and was put behind the bars for 18 months. Tilak was held liable by a jury made out of nine individuals, with the six white jurors casting a ballot against Tilak, and three Indian jurors casting a ballot in support of Tilak. Afterward, Section 124A was given various interpretations by the Federal Court, which started working in 1937, and the Privy Council, which was the highest court of appeal situated in London. 

The Privy Council followed the precedents set down for Tilak’s situation and decided that incitement to violation was not a prerequisite for the crime of sedition and that incitement of feelings of enmity against the government was adequate to set up charge under Section 124A.

Status of Sedition Law after Independence: KM Munshi moved an amendment to eliminate “sedition” that was mentioned in the draft Constitution as a ground to impose limitations on the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression. Therefore, the word “sedition” was subsequently removed from the Constitution when it was adopted on November 26, 1949, and Article 19(1)(a) gave complete freedom of speech and expression. However, Section 124A kept on remaining in the IPC.

In 1951, Jawaharlal Nehru introduced the first amendment to the Constitution to restrict freedom under Article 19(1)(a) and authorized Article 19(2). The new Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, repealed the age-old 1898 Code of Criminal Procedure, and eventually, sedition was made a cognizable offense approving the police to arrest without a warrant.

Sedition Law As A State-Protection Mechanism:

• Area 124A of the IPC has its utility in battling hostility to public, secessionist and terrorist elements. 
• It shields the chosen government from endeavors to overthrow the public authority through brutality and unlawful means. The continued presence of the government set up by law is a fundamental state of the steadiness of the State. 
• If the contempt of court welcomes penal section, condemnation of government should likewise invite penal sanction. 
• Numerous districts in various states face a Maoist insurgency. Rebel organisations essentially run an equal administration. These gatherings transparently advocate the overthrow of the state government by revolution. Against this background, the nullification of Section 124A would be ill-advised only on the grounds that it has been wrongly summoned in some exceptionally publicized cases.

Sedition Law As Colonial Oppressive Tool:

• Section 124A is a relic of colonial oppression and unnecessary in a democratic government. It is a limitation on the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech and expression. 
• Dissent and reasonable criticism of the government are fundamental elements of vigorous public discussion in a democratic government. They ought not to be built as sedition. Right to question, scrutinize and change rulers is basic to a democracy. 
• The British, who introduced sedition to mistreat Indians, have themselves abrogated the law in their country. There is no explanation, for what reason ought not India to nullify this part. 
• The terms utilized under Section 124A like ‘offense’ are ambiguous and dependent upon various interpretations of the investigating officers.

Reference To Landmark Judgements:

The problem emerging from different opinions of the High courts was at last settled by the Supreme Court through its judgment in the Kedar Nath case in 1962, which is viewed as the most definitive judgment of the Supreme Court on the interpretation of the sedition law. A Constitution bench upholds the legitimacy of the sedition law laid down in IPC, holding that the objective behind the crime of sedition was to prevent the government set up by law from being overthrown by some unscrupulous activities. In Balwant Singh and Anr Vs State of Punjab (1995), the Supreme Court dropped sedition charges against two men who raised slogans for an autonomous Sikh majority State outside a movie hall in the aftermath of the assassination of the former PM Indira Gandhi. The court decided in favor of the accused, calling attention to the fact that acts didn’t add up to sedition since the slogans didn’t prompt any unsettling influence, and was not prone to instigate any violence in the minds of the targeted group.

The Law Commission of India, in its report, distributed in August 2018, additionally saw that while holding the law of sedition was important to secure public trustworthiness, it should not be used as an instrument to check free speech.

Conclusion:

India is the largest democracy globally, and the right to free speech and expression is the heart and soul of a well-functioning democracy. The articulation or thought that isn’t in agreement with the strategy of the government ought not to be considered as sedition. Obviously, it is fundamental to secure public safety and integrity. So, the best option is to choose a mid-way that will actually solve the problem rather than ruthless and baseless arrests and detention.

The article is written by Sayani Das pursuing BBA.LLB (H) from Amity Law School, Kolkata.

The article has been edited by Shubham Yadav, pursuing B.com LL.B. from Banasthali Vidyapith.

Latest Posts

• Job opportunity at EXO Edge, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!
• Internship opportunity at Vishwas Advisors, Kalyan, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Internship opportunity at Kulfi Collective, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!
• Job opportunity at The Neotia University, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India: Apply Now !!
• Job opportunity at Morgan Stanley, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at VISA INTELLIGENCE CONSULTANCY LLP, New Delhi, Delhi, India: Apply Now!!  
• Job opportunity at Amazon Web Services (AWS), Gurugram, Haryana, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Stelcore Management Services Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Zscaler, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Irish Expert, Delhi, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at UnitedLex · Gurgaon, Haryana, India: Apply Now!
• Internship opportunity at Vineforce · Nabha, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!

---

• ACEDY (1)
• CLAT-Peeps! (10)
  • Current Affairs (2)
• competitions (132)
• Conferences and Seminars (201)
  • Webinar (1)
• Course and Workshops (107)
• Debates (46)
• DEGY (1)
• Eassy Competitions (69)
• Fellowships & Scholarships (56)
• Guest Blogs (6)
• important (29)
• Internships and Jobs (2,317)
• interviews (8)
• LEGY (1)
• moot court (180)
• Opportuintes (2,731)
  • Job Opportunity (1,191)
• opportunity (2,559)
  • Call for papers (475)
  • Quizes,fests and others (298)
  • Work Opportunity (836)
• Our Blog (1,049)
  • Administrative Law (17)
  • ADR (13)
  • Arms Act (2)
  • Case Analysis (205)
  • Company law (36)
  • Constitutional Law (143)
  • Consumer Protection Act (17)
  • Contract Law (62)
  • CPC (10)
  • Criminal Law (140)
  • Cyber Law (13)
  • Environmental Laws (30)
  • Evidence Act (20)
  • Family Law (12)
  • General (205)
  • International Humanitarian Law (8)
  • International law (23)
  • IPR (10)
  • Jurisprudence (13)
  • labor laws (7)
  • Maritime Laws (1)
  • Partnership Act (2)
  • personal law (33)
  • Taxation (10)
  • Tort (64)
  • Transfer of Property (2)
• Our Services (11)
  • career advice (2)
  • others (6)
• Top Stories (524)
• Uncategorized (720)

Archives

• November 2023 (26)
• October 2023 (1)
• September 2023 (5)
• August 2023 (2)
• July 2023 (25)
• June 2023 (23)
• May 2023 (40)
• April 2023 (136)
• March 2023 (124)
• February 2023 (138)
• January 2023 (61)
• December 2022 (39)
• November 2022 (103)
• October 2022 (178)
• September 2022 (342)
• August 2022 (240)
• July 2022 (273)
• June 2022 (196)
• May 2022 (27)
• April 2022 (99)
• March 2022 (190)
• February 2022 (196)
• January 2022 (193)
• December 2021 (152)
• November 2021 (203)
• October 2021 (189)
• September 2021 (177)
• August 2021 (192)
• July 2021 (393)
• June 2021 (293)
• May 2021 (179)
• April 2021 (61)
• March 2021 (46)
• February 2021 (56)
• January 2021 (63)
• December 2020 (86)
• November 2020 (94)
• October 2020 (146)
• September 2020 (220)
• August 2020 (173)
• July 2020 (165)
• June 2020 (119)
• May 2020 (136)
• April 2020 (7)
• February 2020 (37)
• January 2020 (3)
• November 2019 (1)

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah had appointed Rakesh Asthana as Delhi Police Commissioner as Narendra Modi heads the appointment committee. Rakesh Asthana is an IPS officer and former CBI Special Director as well from which he had retired lately. Being aggrieved by the appointment of Rakesh Asthana as Delhi Police Commissioner Advocate ML Sharma had filed a petition against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah by alleging them for Contempt of Court.

Advocate Sharma stated in his petition that as per the previous judgment of Prakash Singh, that for the appointment as DGP a person must have at least three months of service left before retirement. But as per the present situation appointment is made in violation of Prakash Singh Judgment as four days were left for superannuation which is contempt for the court.

The question that has been put forth from the plea is that whether the Constitution will Survive the dictatorship of the government servant. It was stated that such contempt which is made by Prime Minister itself raised a serious question that does they don’t consideration rules and law as nothing is only for common people.

-Report by RIDDHI DUBEY

The Bombay High Court on Friday, ordered to remove certain content from the internet that was prima facie defamatory to the Actress. Shilpa Shetty on Thursday filed a defamation suit against several media organizations seeking an injunction against false, malicious, and defamatory content published by them. This came after the husband of the actress, Raj Kundra was arrested for his alleged involvement in a porn production case.

The court said imposing a blanket order on the media personnel against the alleged defamatory content would have a “chilling effect on the freedom of the press”. However, the court ordered one media house from Uttar Pradesh to take down a video that portrayed her as ‘duplicitous’ at a personal level, while two others removed their content themselves. The court while ordering the same said that this order shall not act as a gag except for the two or three instances mentioned above.

The court said news reports which are based on police information cannot be construed as defamation. The matter needs to be looked at closely, it cannot be said that all the statements made are defamatory or not.

Shetty has filed a 25 crore defamation suit against 29 media houses- print, electronic and social media to prevent them from circulating derogatory content which is an invasion of her privacy. The Court said, there has to be a certain level of balance between freedom of press and the right of privacy. It simply cannot be said that because a person is a celebrity, such person has forfeited his/her right to privacy.

One video uploaded on the Shudh Manoranjan channel portrayed Shetty on moral grounds commenting on her parenting to her minor children. This video was removed from the online platform and the court said that it shall remain so.

The court has sought responses from the defendants by August 18 and the next date of hearing is to be on September 20th.

-Report by VANESSA RODRIGUES

The PIL regarding the restrain and rehabilitation of the beggars in the wake of this pandemic situation was brought before the court by the petitioner Kush Karla on 27.07.2021, before the bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah.

“We can’t restrain beggars. Nobody wants to beg it’s all the situation leading the human to do so. And this restraining them cannot miss out of our eyes but it is an economic crisis of the society that brought them to this situation even it’s their own will to do so”, said the bench.

Senior advocate Chinmoy Sharma, who appeared as the petitioner’s counsel, responded to the bench that our plea is not regarding the restrain of beggars but to provide rehabilitation for them after being vaccinated, And all the people in this country mandatory to be vaccinated but why not the beggars. In light of this, the court sent notice to the national capital territory of Delhi also to the union of India on the prayer regarding the vaccination and rehabilitation of the beggars.

The court ordered that in regards to the plea every citizen in the country means to be safe and secured, irrespective of the rich nor poor. Also, the court highlighted that it is the socio-economic crisis that leads people in the streets to beg, it is not anyone’s choice to opt for such a decision. Restraining them is not a way to decrease this socio-economic crisis, People do beg due to poverty and unemployment. Also, the mentioned that there are many societies to help and protect the homeless people, though the court issued an order to protect them from the spreading of COVID 19 in the traffics and streets due to the act of begging, And directed the union and Delhi to give response for such human situations, and the court asked the Solicitor General to assist the court.

The hearing would be continued two weeks later.

-Report by AJISHA