Case Number 1952 M. No. 2170 Case Citation  1 All ER 779 Bench Harman J. Decided On 23rd February 1953 Section Partnership- Dissolution Facts of the Case The plaintiff and the defendants were partners in a partnership at will and conducted the business of fashion and commercial photographers. The
Case Number (1906) AC 494 (PC) Bench The Earl of Halsbury, Lord Macnaghten, Sir Arthur Wilson, Sir Alfred Wills Author of the Judgement Lord Macnaghten Decided On 16 July 1906 Brief Facts and Procedural History There was a partnership between Goldberg- a land speculator, Trimble- an auctioneer and Bennet- a
Case Number CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2009 OF 2013 Equivalent Citation AIR 2014 SC 309 Bench K.S. Radhakrishnan, Pinaki Chandra Ghose Author of the Judgement- K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. Decided on 26 November 2013 Relevant Act/ Section Section 2, 3, 12, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic
CASE NUMBER Civil Appeal No 274 of 2020 BENCH Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud Justice Mukeshkumar Rasikbhai Shah DECIDED ON 8 March 2021 RELEVANT ACT/ SECTION The Consumer Protection Act, 2019. BRIEF FACTS It was the year 2012 when the appellant floated a housing project in Gurugram. Subsequently, an advertisement was
Case Number CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.271 OF 2011 Equivalent Citation (2011) 3 SCC 650 Bench Altamas Kabir Cyriac Joseph Decided on 31 January 2011 Respondents (R1) Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade (R2) Ramabai, Appellant’s mother-in-law (R3) Appellant’s sister-in-law Relevant Act/ Section Section 2(q) of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Case Number Civil Appeal Nos. 429-430 of 2021. Equivalent Citation LL 2021 SC 102. Bench L. Nageswara Rao & Indira Banerjee. Decided on 18 February 2021. Relevant Act/ Section Article 14 and 16 of the Indian Constitution. Brief Facts and Procedural History In 2008, the Home Department of Jharkhand govt.