As changing time the old slow system should also be replaced with a new and faster system. As electronics have become such a crucial part of our lives so their need is felt in some parts of the Judiciary as well to faster the system. As the old and existing system of transiting bail always delays the release of the prisoners so on Friday Chief Justice of India NV Ramana stated his thought on bringing a new system to transit bail electronically to the prison authority so that there should not be any delay in the release of the prisoners as soon as bail is granted to them.

Chief Justice of India felt the need for this change while an order to release a prisoner is granted by the court but it is delayed just because the prison authority hasn’t received is a copy of it yet. After knowing this CJI said, “this is too much”. He also stated that in the generation where communication can be done in seconds, we are still looking at the skies for the pigeons to communicate the orders. As there is numerous case still pending and release of prisoners on are on just because we are lacking back with a change in time.

So Chief Justice directed the Secretary of the Supreme Court to come up within one month with a system to communicate the bail release electronically so that this outdated system can be detached from Supreme Court.

-Report by RIDDHI DUBEY

On Friday, the government of Maharashtra opposed the bail request of activist Sudha Bharadwaj, who was arrested in the Elgar Parishad case of the Mumbai High Court, arguing that he lacked the right of the lower courts. The accusation of jurisdiction is wrong. Sudha Bharadwaj, who has been detained since September 2018, applied for bail because the court hearing the prosecution was initially not authorized to do so.

Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni argued that although the case was referred to under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), the 2020 investigation was taken over by the National Investigative Agency (NIA) of police. The special court only took over the NIA afterward, he said. Until then, the court of appeal in Pune will be responsible, he added.

Special tribunals will be set up under the NIA to “try” matters investigated by the NIA that “do not include pre-trial hearings,” Kumbhakoni said. “The petitioner’s argument is wrong,” confirmed the Attorney General.

A division bench consisting of Judge SS Shinde and Judge NJ Jamadar will continue hearing the petition on July 23. According to Sudha Bharadwaj, the Pune court that arrested her and eight others in police custody in 2018 did not have the power to hear a UAPA case. His attorney, Yug Chaudhry, argued in previous hearings that a trial judge can only take cognizance of UAPA crimes following specific instructions from the district judge.

Police alleged that “incendiary speeches” held at the Elgar Parishad conclave in Pune on January 1, 2018, led to caste violence at the Bhima Koregaon Breed Memorial in the district, and the conclave was supported by Maoists. Activist Stan Swamy, arrested in the case last year, died in hospital earlier this month.

-Report by MANASWA SHARMA

-Report by ESHAN SHARMA

The current appeal has been filed by an encroacher on evacuee land of 0-14 acre-guntha of Survey No.191/2 in Godhara, Gujarat, since 1976, where he has been operating an auto shop known as Bharat Motor Garage. On October 24, 2013, the appellant’s writ suit challenging the eviction order dated 23.6.1992 was dismissed by the Learned Single Bench. The learned Division Bench sustained the order. The appellant, who is still aggrieved, has brought his case to this Court.

PETITIONER’S CONTENTION

On 16.07.1992, the appellant filed a writ suit in the Gujarat High Court in Ahmedabad, bearing Special Civil Application (SCA) No. 4700 of 1992. Along with the SCA filed by the appellant, another SCA No.2940 of 1992 brought by one Srikant Deviprasad Joshi was heard. Shri Joshi claimed ownership of the property in question based on an allocation made to him on September 20, 1972, as enemy property. On December 6, 1974, the land assigned to Shri Joshi was annulled. On July 15, 1975, the appeal against the stated order was denied. Shri Joshi then filed an SCA with the High Court, which was dismissed on October 24, 2013. The said order had finally attained finality qua Shri Joshi.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

  • On January 20, 2014, an order was issued in an intra-court appeal remanding both SCAs to the learned Single Bench. However, the application and the Letters Patent Appeal were both dismissed on March 10, 2014.
  • The learned counsel argued for the appellant before this court is founded upon the policy dated 20.6.1978 for allotment of evacuee land to encroachers and the resolution dated 8.1.1980 in respect of allotment of another public land to encroachers. The appellant as an encroacher is covered by one or both of the insurance, therefore, is entitled to claim regularization of his ownership.
  • On 24.10.2013, the appellant’s writ suit contesting the eviction order dated 23.6.1992 was dismissed by the Learned Single Bench. The ruling has been sustained by the learned Division Bench. The appellant is back in court, still aggrieved.

RESPONDENT’S CONTENTION

The learned counsel count on the judgments in the cases of:

Ramesh Parsram Malani v. State of Telangana

Based on a government policy decision of 20.06.1978, the displaced person-respondent is claiming allotment. The evacuee land must be given to a displaced person because it is part of the compensation pool under Section 14 of the Act and can only be allotted under Section 20. Only one displaced person can be assigned to the evacuee land. After all of the displaced people have been settled, the allocation to non-displaced people can be considered. As a result, the paragraph in the policy dated 20.6.1978 that allows evacuee land to encroachers is contrary to the Act’s design and purpose. However, any allotment made to an encroacher that has reached finality will not be reopened. As a result, an encroacher has no right to regularize evacuee land in the presence of a displaced person entitled to the allotment to achieve the Act’s goal.

COURT JUDGEMENT

“The possession of the land was taken over by the government on January 24, 2014, according to the report. The appellant’s claim now is for restoration of possession by an encroacher, which is completely untenable in above observations.”

The rule is made an outright and present appeal and the same is dismissed.

-Report by MANASWA SHARMA

On July 5, the Delhi High Court, composed of Judge Sanjeev Narula, ruled that it was inappropriate to intervene in the ruling unless there were grounds for allegations of deliberate misconduct and prejudice against scholars. The arbitrator and the court found that if the court does not interfere with such a decision, the well-trained arbitrator will review all the documents in the minutes of the meeting very methodically and evaluate the evidence provided by both parties before concluding.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The motion attempted to set aside the arbitration award under Article 34 of the Arbitration and Mediation Act 1996. The sole learned arbitrator acknowledged the claim of the defendant Saptrishi Builders Private Limited (abbreviated as SBPL) and 1,30,02,314.13 rupees with interest on the date of award During the month, Veg Sanchar Vihar Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd.’s interest was 12% of the prescribed amount. (VSV for short) has appointed SBPL as the contractor for 68 apartments. In Dwarka 6, District 19-B, New Delhi, under the tariffs and conditions stipulated there, SBPL stated that it had performed work under the specifications stipulated in the contract, but VSV refused to pay for the contract. SBPL had previously seen a legal notice dated July 14, 2010, went to the arbitration, and asked VSV to approve the appointment of Mr. P. Bhatia (colleague engineer) as the arbitrator. Controversial decision.

LAWSUIT OF THE APPLICANT

SAAM’s lawyer, Mr. V. V. Gautam, stated:

  • The appointment of learned arbitrators allegedly violated Article 43 of the contract, which stipulates that arbitrators must be learned officials. From the Institute of Engineers (India) or Institute of Architects (India). The sole arbitrator, Mr. Vivekanand, did not meet any criteria, so his appointment should be invalid.
  • Some people think that because of the subject matter contained in Articles 20-27 (except for Article 25), it does not fall within the scope of arbitration under Article 42(a). The arbitration will only be resorted to after the procedures in paragraph 42 have been implemented.
  • It was argued that since the construction project, the quality, quantity, and quality of the materials used, as well as the invoices, have been overdue. 27 They are supervised and protected. The statement of the responsible arbitrator is unfounded and is deliberately disadvantageous to SAAM.

DEFENDANT’S ACTION:

SBPL Attorney, Shekhar Nanavaty made the following argument:

  • It has been alleged that the arbitrator was appointed by this court under Article 11 of the Act at the request of the SBPL and therefore cannot currently be appointed to be questioned.
  • It was further argued that at the time of appointment or according to Section 13 of the Act, no objections had been raised before the Scientific Arbitrator. No document was recorded demonstrating fraud or forgery by the Referee.
  • It was further alleged that the learned arbitrator, after examining the competing allegations and evidence, approved a well-reasoned award that was free from weakness or illegality and should therefore not be interfered with by this court.

REASON’S AND JUDGEMNET OF THE COURT

The honorable court made the following determination:

  • The arbitration is fully justified and corresponds to the contractual scheme. There is no contradiction to clause 42 of the contract. and the objection raised on this basis is untenable.
  • The conclusions and reasoning of the experienced arbitrator based on the allegations and evidence are reasonable and cannot be objected to once the final invoice has been received. Therefore, the court found no merit, viz. Falsification or fraud in connection with the final invoice.
  • The SAAM’s argumentation is not only vague, but it is also completely wrong and legally untenable. After carefully examining the documents, the scientific arbitrator awarded the amount in favor of the SBPL. In the light of the foregoing, the Court of First Instance found the present petition neither to be justified nor to have grounds capable of prejudice to the contested award.

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday ordered the Federation of Indian Pilots to provide more information about the number of pilots who participated in the Vande Bharat Mission and other similar missions so that the Court can consider their claim for compensation for services rendered during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Senior Advocate Prasad Dhakephalkar said that Federation pilots were participating in the Central Government’s Vande Bharat Mission (VBM) and Air Bubble missions, which were used to evacuate stranded individuals from overseas and for the transportation of life-saving medicines. He submitted the report that COVID took the lives of roughly thirteen senior pilots, with some of them also suffering from long-term effects due to which they had lost their pilot license.

Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni said that before they could evaluate the prayers of the petitions, they needed further information about the pilots. “We’d like facts and numbers, such as the number of pilots and which airline they work for, their salary and benefits, and how many flights were part in the Vande Bharat Mission or similar missions.”

They postponed the matter’s hearing for two weeks to give the Federation time to file an additional affidavit with these details. The Federation filed public interest litigation (PIL) requesting that the Maharashtra government and the Central government, through the Ministry of Civil Aviation, develop a policy or program providing adequate pay to pilots who were giving emergency services. The Federation also requested that the Ministry issue instructions to develop a comprehensive insurance policy that would cover all pilots. It was also suggested that the Ministry develop a special class of COVID first responders known as ‘Air Transportation Workers’ to receive priority in the vaccines. Finally, the Federation sought perks that could be granted to pilots, such as family employment to the family member of the pilots who succumbed to COVID.

The matter will be heard again after two weeks.

-Report by Eshan Sharma

Recently a hashtag was trending on the Twitter page stating that most of the positive cases of coronavirus were found from Tablighi Jamaat Nizammudin in Delhi which is the reason for the massive spread of coronavirus, by attaching the Muslim community in the tweets by highlighting the term #Islamiccoronavirusjihad. Concerning this, a plea was brought down under the SC by Advocate Khaja Aijazuddin who appeared as the petitioner. This case was heard by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana.

As we all know that previously in our country so many controversies were held against the Muslim community, and this shouldn’t be happening in our country, as we are living in a diverse society, united together with all the religious communities. It is our right and responsibility to take care of our nation. But irrespective of this our nation is completely down due to the conflicts happening by the religious community.

In contrary to this CJI asked the petitioner that “already people are forgetting these issues, you want to rake them up again?” so the main issue of this plea by the petitioner is, in this pandemic situation the social media should deliver positive news content to the society rather spreading the hate message against the religious community and hurting the religious feelings and belief of the community. And the petitioner asked the court to direct the government to frame particular guild lines under the IT Act of 2000 about the hate message delivered on Twitter and asked the court to restrain these types of messages in social media.

Regarding this issue, the petitioner prayed under Telangana HC, then moved to the apex court since the court does not entertain his matter. Then the court implied on this matter and adjourned the matter for a week and asked the petitioner to read new IT rules where the petitioner contended that the new IT rules do address the issue of communal propaganda in social media where there exists a new rule of IT Act 2021 as it already takes care of it.

-Report by AJISHA

United Nations Commission On International Trade Law: History

UNCITRAL which in full stands for United Nations Commission on International Trade Law is a body established by the United Nations Assembly on the 17th December 1966.  The UNCITRAL headquarters are in Vienna (Austria). The purpose of the abovementioned commission is to promote the progressive harmonization and unification of international trade law governed by conventions and other instruments. That is, in a case where there is a dispute in relation to the international sale of goods, there are rules and laws enacted by the said commission which tend to resolve any arising dispute between contracting states. This is made possible by passing of instruments such as conventions and models laws that govern the formation of international sale of goods.

Members/Structure Of The Commission

The Commission is composed of sixty members. The discretion to select the member states lies within the United Nations General Assembly. The membership takes the duration of a maximum of six years with the membership expiring every three years. The membership ensures representation of the world’s geographic regions and principal economic and legal systems. There are 14 member states from Africa, 14 from the Asia-Pacific region, 10 from Latin-America and the Caribbean, 8 from the Eastern Europe and 14 from Western Europe and Others.

How The Commission Functions

The commission works in 6 UN languages, namely; Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish. The decisions made by the Commission are made on a consensual basis. That is, for a decision to be passed by it, there has to be consent made by the participants on the seating. The participants include member states, observer state and non- and inter-governmental organizations.

The participants have a mandate to finalize and or adopt the drafts referred to by the working groups of the commission. The working groups are divided into six with each having its own obligations. The first working group focuses on micro, small and medium sized enterprises. Secondly there is a working group whose mandate is to settle disputes. There is also an ISDS Reform working group. The fourth working group is based on electronic commerce. The fifth working group works on insolvency law and the last one on security interests respectively.

UNCITRAL On Dispute Settlement

Amongst its mandates, the UNCITRAL is established with the purpose of settling disputes that arise between states during trade. The commission adopts arbitration and conciliation as a method of its dispute resolution. This commission has enacted laws that govern international trade thus providing statutes that are referred to when disputes arise between trading states. These statutes are:

  1. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (The New York Convention passed in 1958. According to the objectives stated in the Convention, the legislators recognize the growing importance of international arbitration as a means of settling international commercial disputes. This is made possible by the fact that it seeks to provide common legislative standards for the recognition of arbitration agreements and court recognition and enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbitral awards.
  2. UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules enacted in 1976: according to Article 1 of the rules, the rules apply where parties in a trade agreement consent to the application of such rules in a case of a dispute. The rules govern the arbitration process to be followed when there is an arbitral proceeding between parties.
  3.  UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules which has been in force since 1980: It provides a comprehensive set of procedural rules upon which parties may agree for the conduct of the arbitral proceedings arising out of their commercial relationship.  They cover all aspects of the conciliation process, providing a model conciliation clause, defining when conciliation is deemed to have commenced and terminated and addressing procedural aspects relating to the appointment and the role of conciliators and the general conduct of proceedings.
  4. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1958):  this set of laws assist contracting states reform and modernize their laws or agreements on arbitral procedure such that they take into consideration the particular features and needs of international commercial arbitration. 
  5. UNCITRAL NOTES ON ORGANISING ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS: this aims at assisting arbitration practitioners with the issues associated with the arbitral proceedings. The notes provide a guide for practitioners providing for amongst others; confidentiality, transparency, documentary evidence and the seat of arbitration.
  6. UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONCILIATION (2002): This is designed with the aim of helping states in reforming and modernizing their laws on mediation procedure.
  7. RECOMMENDATIONS TO ASSIST ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS AND OTHER INTERESTED BODIES WITH REGARD TO ARBITRATION (2012)
  8. UNCITRAL RULES ON TRANSPARENCY IN TREATY-BASED INVESTOR STATE-ARBITRATION (2013)

Although the list of the enacted legislations to solve arising disputes between contracting parties is not exhaustive, the common aim or objectives of the instruments is to provide guidelines, laws, rules and regulations  that govern such an agreement. The said parties agree that they will be governed by UNCITRAL for the instruments to apply. 

The article is written by Pulane Kholoanyane from the National University of Lesotho.

The article is edited by Shubham Yadav, pursuing B.com LL.B. (4th Year) from Banasthali Vidyapith.

Latest Posts


Archives

Case Number 

  • CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.271 OF 2011

Equivalent Citation 

  • (2011) 3 SCC 650

Bench

  • Altamas Kabir 
  • Cyriac Joseph

Decided on 

  • 31 January 2011

Respondents 

  • (R1) Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade 
  • (R2) Ramabai, Appellant’s mother-in-law 
  • (R3) Appellant’s sister-in-law

Relevant Act/ Section 

  • Section 2(q) of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
  • Section 498-A of India Penal Code

Brief Facts and Procedural History 

  • Although the main body of Section 2(q) expressly states that a respondent is a “adult male person,” the proviso broadens the scope of the proceedings by allowing an aggrieved wife or female in a relationship in the nature of marriage to file a complaint against a relative of her husband/male partner. This refutes the claim that the legislation was written with the intention of excluding women. The appeal was granted, with the Trial Courts directed to consider R2 and R3 as respondents in the case.

Issues before the Court 

  • Do females fall under the definition of “respondents” in the Domestic Violence Act’s Section 2(q)? 
  • Are females excluded from prosecution under the Domestic Violence Act?

Facts of the Case 

  • The appellant lived with R1, R2, and R3 for over a year following her marriage in 2005, during which time her marriage was disrupted. She reported her husband to the police under section 498-A IPC For attacking her. She also filed a complaint against all three respondents. The First-Class Judicial Magistrate approved it, directing R1 to pay on a monthly basis maintenance. All respondents were also barred from evicting the appellant from her matrimonial home. Criminal appeals and applications brought before the Sessions Judge by an aggrieved R1. The appeals to the Supreme Court and the High Court were both dismissed.
  • R2 and R3 went before the First-Class Magistrate, but their request was denied. They filed an appeal, arguing that women cannot be named respondents in domestic violence cases. The Court agreed and overturned the order, allowing appellant to be evicted from her marriage home, which was solely owned by R2. As a result, it was not a “shared house.” The Court, on the other hand, ordered R1 to furnish separate accommodations or make additional payments for it.
  • The appellant’s appeal in Sessions Court was dismissed based on the determination that “females” are not included among “respondents.” The HC took a similar stance, striking R2 and R3’s names from the proceedings and ordering the appellant to evacuate the matrimonial home. As a result, this appeal has been made.

Decision of the Court 

  • Although the main body of Section 2(q) expressly states that a respondent is a “adult male person,” the proviso broadens the scope of the proceedings by allowing an aggrieved wife or female in a relationship in the nature of marriage to file a complaint against a relative of her husband/male partner. This refutes the claim that the legislation was written with the intention of excluding women. The appeal was granted, with the Trial Courts directed to consider R2 and R3 as respondents in the case.

The case analysis has been done by Shrey Hasija.

The case analysis has been edited by Shubham Yadav, pursuing B.com LL.B.(4th Year) from Banasthali Vidyapith.

Latest Posts


Archives

“A market without consumers will be a night sky without the stars and moon.”

The Concept Of Consumer Protection

The consumer movement started in developed countries almost a century ago.  An American businessman was once quoted saying, “God created masses of mankind to be exploited. I exploit them. I will do his will.” This, though may not be the approach of every business person, is by and large true and hence proves the need for Consumer protection. Consumer protection guidelines or consumer protection laws came up as an answer to the malignant exploitation which the consumers faced at the hands of sellers and businessmen. 

Previously it was the buyer’s duty to carefully examine goods for any defects or deficiencies before buying them. This was a time when the maxim “Caveat Emptor” was followed, meaning “let the buyer be aware.” However, gradually it was noticed that since there was no way by which a consumer could know or identify any inherent defect in a product (due to reasons such as lack of knowledge), they were being taken undue advantage of by the sellers. This resulted in the consumer movement. Protests and campaigns worldwide finally resulted in the shift from “Caveat Emptor” to “Caveat Venditor,” meaning, “let the seller be aware. Thus the obligation slowly shifted from the buyers to the sellers. 

Consumer Protection In India

The Government had enacted various legislations for protection of the interest of the consumers after independence including, The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Standard of Weights and Measures Act 1976, The Bureau of Indian Standards Act 1986The Monopolistic Restrictive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, 1969. However, India still lacked comprehensive legislation benefiting the interests of the consumers. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was the first step towards safeguarding the rights of consumers in India. It guaranteed some fundamental rights to the consumers, which are explained as follows:

RIGHT TO SAFETY

This right confers the consumers with the power to insist on the quality of goods before buying them. They have the right to be protected against the marketing of hazardous goods and services. Consumers must buy products marked with ISI, AGMARK.

RIGHT TO BE INFORMED

Consumers have a right to be informed about the quality, quantity, standard, potency, and price of the goods as a means of protection from unfair trade practices.

RIGHT TO CHOOSE

Access to a variety of goods and services at a competitive price also is a right of the consumers. In the case of monopolies, the consumers must be ensured of a good quality of product at a fair price and must be protected from any unfair advantages which the seller might try to take. 

RIGHT TO BE HEARD

The consumers have a right to voice their grievances at consumer forums and receive due compensation for any damages incurred.


RIGHT TO SEEK REDRESSAL

The rights to a fair settlement in cases of a genuine grievance and protection against unfair trade practices or exploitation of consumers have also been guaranteed under this Act.

RIGHT TO CONSUMER EDUCATION

 To successfully implement the goal of consumer protection, consumers must be made aware of their rights and ways in which they can exercise them effectively. Rural consumers need special attention in this aspect as they face the most exploitation on account of lack of awareness.

The same Act also introduced a three-tier grievance redressal mechanism. Unfortunately, people in India, less aware of their rights as well as remedies, could not utilize the provisions to their full advantage. To correct this problem, the Government has undertaken measures to educate the consumers about their rights. One such popular campaign was ‘Jago Grahak Jago’ in 2005, which aimed at creating awareness on consumer protection.

Throughout the last decade we have seen an evolution in the ways of trade. As online shopping portals became the go-to place for an increasing number of people, the Parliament realized the loophole in the present Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as it did not cover online transactions. The legislature’s objective was to leverage the power of consumer protection, which had previously been limited to products and services under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986, to include complaints and difficulties stemming from the expansion of virtual markets. The legislature, keeping in mind all the new provisions that needed to be added to keep pace with the digital age, scraped the old statute and enacted the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 which included new concepts such as e-commerce, product liability, mediation, and the establishment of a Central Consumer Protection Authority as an executive authority for settlement of all consumer grievances. 

E-Commerce And Its Inclusion

Under Consumer Protection Act, 2019, e-commerce has been defined as “means buying or selling of goods or services including digital products over a digital or electronic network” Unlike the previous legislation, it includes all online transactions shielding customers of online shopping portals from getting cheated or online frauds. Liabilities such as maintaining a fair trade practice, reimbursing or compensating consumers in return for products, and correct and accurate advertising of products were placed on e-commerce entities and online sellers. Also, incorporating all e-commerce organizations under the Companies Act, 2013 was made compulsory through this Act. 

The new Act has enhanced consumer rights by making e-retailers more accountable and creating a transparent redressal procedure, which has helped customers in making more informed decisions when purchasing products and services. Effective implementation of rigorous restrictions, as well as penalties and punishment, has acted as a catalyst in deterring the producers and retailers from using dishonest and exploitative practices. In addition to this, convenient grievance resolution mechanisms have encouraged more consumers to engage in online transactions and strengthened consumers’ confidence in e-retailers, finally resulting in the development of this sector and an increased flow in profits.

Product Liability Under CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019

Under Chapter VI of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the concept of product liability has been defined. It was not previously included in the 1986 act and is a new addition in order to make the product manufacturers, sellers, and service providers more stringently liable against any defective product sold or poor service delivered. This concept was developed based on the maxim of “Caveat Venditor” Under the following circumstances, and if any harm is suffered by a consumer, they can bring in liability action against the manufacturer or seller:

  1. If a product contains any manufacturing defect or is defective in design
  2. It does not conform to the express warranty
  3. The product does not have sufficient information about the correct method of usage or any warning against any potential harm or injury that could be suffered on account of any incorrect use. 
  4. In the case of a service provider, if he was negligent in providing the service, which resulted in an injury to the consumer, or the service delivered was deficient and inadequate, he could be made liable.
  5. A product seller can be made liable in cases where he had a substantial amount of say over designing, manufacturing, packaging, or labeling of the product that caused harm.
  6. If a product seller altered or modified the product while selling it, then also he could be made liable.

One important point to note is that the liability of the product manufacturer is absolute under all circumstances. Even if he claims to have taken substantial care and there was no negligence on his part, he cannot escape his liability. In comparison, there are certain exceptions allowed to product sellers. In cases where at the time of the accident, the product had been altered or misused, the product seller cannot be made liable.

The Supreme Court, in a case, pointed out that in issues relating to Product Liability, the court will adjudge the matters based on the facts and the evidence presented in the court of law.

Mediation Under CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019

Alternative Dispute Resolution methods have become an increasingly popular method of settling disputes in the corporate sectors. Through the 2019 act, the Government allowed mediation to be used as a process for addressing the grievance of consumers. In the case of Afcons Infrastructure Ltd v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd, the Supreme Court ruled that all the matters related to commerce, trade, consumer dispute, or contract could be mediated. It is placed a duty on the State Government to establish mediation cells, the mediating officers of which, while moderating a case, must follow the principles of natural justice. 

The guidelines to be followed in the process of mediation were laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Bijoy Sinha Roy V Biswanath Das & Ors. According to the guidelines, if at any point while hearing the consumer disputes, the officer feels that such an issue can be effectively settled through mediation, then with the consent of both the parties, it can be referred for mediation. 

Conclusion

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, in its true sense, has made it easier for consumers to voice their dissatisfaction with products or services obtained and get remedies for the same. The inclusion of online sale services and the introduction of settlement dispute mechanisms such as mediation have made a positive impact. Also, the undertaking of campaigns to create awareness among consumers has resulted in an informed citizenry resulting in less exploitation of consumers.

The article is written by Debasmita Nandi, a first year law student of CHRIST (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), LAVASA.

The article is edited by Shubham Yadav, pursuing B.com LL.B. (4th Year) from Banasthali Vidyapith.

Latest Posts


Archives

Introduction

“We won’t have a society if we destroy the environment.”

Margaret Mead

The best gift that mankind possesses is not the economy, it’s the environment, the gift that mother earth gave, without repentance. Our environment is perhaps the main facet due to which survival is possible on this planet. Also, it is the only thing that makes life reasonable. Without it, we can’t endure even a single day. 

India’s Biodiversity & Hotspots

India has an extraordinary abundance of biodiversity in its forests, wetlands and marine regions. It has a wide scope of natural surroundings going from tropical rainforest to snow capped vegetation and from temperate forests to coastal wetlands. India comprises fertile river fields and high plateau and a few significant waterways including the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Indus. India shows an incredible variety in environment, geography and topography henceforth exceptionally wealthy in biodiversity. The Ministry of Environment and Forest Govt. of India (2000) records 47,000 types of plants and 81000 types of animals.

This is about 7% and 6.5% individually of flora & fauna of the world. Around 5000 types of blooming plants have their origin point in India. India is observed to be the pivot of origin of 160 types of harvest plants and 320 types of wild members of cultivated yields. India has 372 mammal species (eighth most in world), 1228 types of birds (eighth in world), and 428 types of reptiles (fifth in world). India has in excess of 50,000 types of insect species including 13000 butterflies and moths.

There are 4 out of 36 biodiversity hotspots of the world situated in India — The Himalayas, the Indo-Burma region, Western Ghats, and the Sundaland. Hotspots will be regions that are very rich in species, have high endemism (species restricted to a specific region), and are under constant danger.

Concept of hotspots of biodiversity was instituted by Norman Myers in 1988. He recognized they needed regions for in situ protection. Certain regions in different parts of the world are known for their mega biodiversity of species. India contributes around 8% of worldwide biodiversity, in spite of the fact that it bears just 2.4 percent of the world’s land space. These regions are especially wealthy in floral riches and endemism, in blossoming plants as well as in reptiles, amphibians, butterflies and mammal species as well.

Classification of a Biodiversity Hotspot

To qualify as a biodiversity hotspot the region must fulfill 2 criteria:

  1. It should have no less than 1,500 vascular plants as endemics — or, in other words, it’s anything but a high level of vegetation discovered no place else in the world. A hotspot is irreplaceable. 
  1. It should have 30% or less of its unique normal vegetation. In short, it should be threatened.

Steps taken to safeguard the Indian biodiversity & hotspots by government

  1. The Central Government has legislated the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. The Act, inter alia, imparts the formation of reserved Regions for the safeguarding of wildlife and furthermore imparts punishment for hunting of determined fauna prescribed in the Schedule I to IV thereof. Trade in rare and endangered species ought to be prohibited. National parks and sanctuaries ought to be made for the safeguard of wildlife.
  1. Wetland (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010 have been outlined for the safeguard of wetlands, in the States.
  1. The Scheme of National plan for Protection of Oceanic Ecosystem additionally gives help to the States to the administration of wetlands incorporating Ramsar sites in the country. Wildlife Crime Control Bureau has been set up for control of illicit trade of wildlife, including endangered species.
  1. Government of India is signatory to Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). CBD was set up in 1992-93 after the Rio de Janeiro Earth Submit. (i) To preserve the biodiversity. (ii) To utilize the biodiversity and its components but in a reasonable way. (iii) Impartial dispensation of advantages of biodiversity.
  1. Environmental courts & tribunals like National Green Tribunal were set up for the protection of environment & wildlife in India. Schemes & projects like Narmada bachao andolan, project tiger, green India mission, recovery of endangered species etc. were launched for safeguarding the biodiversity & hotspots in India.

Judicial Assistance/Pronouncements 

The shortfall of an unmistakable law is moving a back-and-forth between clients of natural assets and administrative bodies. It is presently about time that the judiciary strides in to develop jurisprudence on manageable and even handed administration of biodiversity while protecting the Constitutional principles against arrest, search and seizure.

In the case of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra, Dehradun vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, the two judge bench of J. Bhagwati & J. R. Mishra, Seat of Judges PN Bhagwati and Ranganath Mishra, presented the concept of “Sustainable Development”. An NGO named RLEK filed a case against limestone quarrying in the valley in 1987. It was expressed that the lasting resources of humankind are not to be depleted in one age. The natural resources ought to be utilized with imperative consideration and care so ecology and climate may not be influenced in a critical manner.

In case of, Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs. Union of IndiaJ. Reddy held that the monetary expenses of forestalling or curing harm brought about by contamination should lie with the endeavors which cause the contamination by embracing the “Polluter Pays Principle”. The Court put forth a limit for the seaside states to formulate coastal administration designs and restrict industrial or construction within 500 meters of the Elevated Tide Line.

In the case of, Animal Welfare Board of India vs. A. Nagaraj and Ors., the Supreme Court banned Jallikattu & other animal races & fights, alluded that even these carried in the name of culture & tradition but these are illicit acts that the humans perform. Referring to Section 3 & 11 The Court declared these acts illegal & imposed fines under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

TN Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India and Ors., Supreme Court held & set up a Compensatory Afforestation Funds Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA), to survey the afforestation endeavors, to direct the remuneration who endured because of deforestation, and to speed up exercises for safeguarding of forests.

In the Tarun Bharat Sangh vs. Union of India and Ors., Supreme Court passed the verdict that restricted/banned the mining activities that were taking place in the Sariska Wildlife Sanctuary & proved to be a great source for the protection of Sanctuaries from the mining activities.

Conclusion

As we progressively become clued-up of how significant biodiversity depletion has become, we are gradually making laws and treaties to safeguard these resources. This duty of protection needs the involvement of stakeholders and consumers. Essentially distinguishing species in danger cannot initiate protection. Individuals are to be taught in such a manner. They should preserve biodiversity.

The article is written by Ajay Kataria, from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar National Law University, Sonepat, Haryana.

The article is edited by Shubham Yadav, pursuing B.com LL.B. (4th year) from Bnasthali Vidyapith.

Latest Posts


Archives