About School of Law, Sushant University:

School of Law, Sushant University has been ranked no 3 amongst the top Law Schools by State and ranked 8th in top Outstanding Law Schools of Excellence in CSR-GHRDC Law Schools Survey 2020. The School has been conferred numerous awards for academic excellence for five consecutive years making it an ace law college in the millennial city Gurgaon. Recognized as the ‘Emerging Law School of the Year-2018’ by Legal Desire, ranked as one of the top promising law schools 2018 and No.1 Rank in the category of Promising Law School by GHRDC (Global Human Resource Development Centre) in 2017, recognized as the ‘Emerging Law School of the Year2016’ by INBA. It is a top- notch institution with outstanding credentials committed to the cause of excellence in legal education in Delhi/NCR.

About Centre For Corporate Legal Research and Training:

The promoting body of the School of Law, Sushant University has a vision and mission to build and continuously nurture a self-financed institution with excellence in education, research, development, consultancy and extension of internationally recognized standards. This institution serves as an intellectual resource base for the development of professional human capital bridging the gap between academics and real life to meet the professional challenges of the millennium. The Centre for Corporate Legal, Research and Training (CCLRT) is an endeavor to provide a professional platform and outbound exposure to the students to excel in the field of corporate laws.

About the Conference:

Corporate governance is the mechanisms, processes and relations by which corporations are controlled and directed. Governance structures and principles identify the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation and includes the rules and procedures for making decisions in corporate affairs. In India, a small initiative was taken by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) in the field of good corporate governance. Thereafter, various committees have been constituted to give recommendations in this regard.

Sub Themes:

  • Global Trends in Corporate Governance
  • Role of Corporate Governance in M&A and Impact of Changing Policies
  • Corporate Governance and Policies under Antitrust Law
  • Importance of Due Diligence in the changing Corporate Governance Paradigm
  • Nexus between Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Corporate Governance Regulation in International Economics

Important Dates:

  • Registrations Open: – June 10, 2021
  • Last date of Research Paper Submission: – August 15, 2021
  • Date of the Conference: -August 27, 2021

Awards:

Prizes worth Rs. 12,000/- and other exciting opportunities to be won by Best Researcher and Runner-up.

Registration:

Submit the Research Paper as per the guidelines.

Registration Fees

  • For Students and Research Scholars – Rs. 1000/- per Author
  • For Academicians – Rs. 1200/- per Author

Payment Details:

NEFT:
Account Name: Tarun Kumar
Account Number: 39068854208
IFSC: SBIN0015265

GPay-UPI:
t.kumar0082@oksbi

Submit your Research Paper using the link given here if the submission was not made during registration: https://forms.gle/fcZKS3ecNprguAAG7

Official Brochure:

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About Scholasticus:

Scholasticus (ISSN 0975-1157), one of the earliest publication by National Law University, Jodhpur, has had the privilege of publishing the articles from some stalwarts of the legal arena including Abir Lal Dey (Partner, L&L Partners), Justice K.G. Balakrishnan (Former Chief Justice of India), Fali S. Nariman (Senior Advocate at Supreme Court of India), etc. Scholasticus is now published under the aegis of the Centre of Studies in Banking and Finance at National Law University, Jodhpur. The Journal takes immense pride in being the frontrunner to focus on Banking and Finance laws and aims to provide an exclusive forum for the banking and finance laws that will be one of a kind in the country. The Journal has been re-launched after a gap of a few years, and shall be published bi-annually. The Journal intends to recognize and foster academic research in the arena and particularly welcomes submissions critically examining the regulatory framework.

About the Centre:

The Centre of Studies in Banking and Finance at National Law University, Jodhpur (CSBF) was established by the Reserve Bank of India in 2002. The Centre provides a platform for scholars and practitioners to exchange views on issues dealing with banking and financial systems through its Conferences, Essay Competitions, Workshops and Discussion Forums. CSBF seeks to promote discourse related to the banking sector, capital markets and other financial services. The Journal is another venture of the Centre to associate with professionals, judges, academicians and students to discuss ideas related to the banking and finance sector.

Submission Categories:

Scholasticus (ISSN 0975-1157) is accepting submissions under the following categories:

Long Articles (6,000 – 8,000 words): Long Articles must comprehensively analyze important themes and may adopt comparative perspectives. It must analyze the current practice in the field, identify the lacunae therein and provide constructive suggestions.

Short Articles (3,000 – 6,000 words): typically identify a specific issue, which may be of contemporary relevance and present a central argument.

Case Notes, Legislative Comments, Book/Article Reviews (1,500 – 3,000 words)

Suggested Themes:

  • Scope, Needs, and Efforts to ease listing, financing & securitization of Startups
  • Changing legal landscape for credit derivatives
  • Enhancing risk management system of clearance houses
  • The emergence of new ways for management of stressed assets
  • Upping the ante in IT Services for Banks – How prepared is India in moving towards becoming a cash-free economy
  • Standardization of practices in the Insurance sector.

Please note that the aforementioned themes are merely indicative and not exhaustive.

Submission Guidelines:

  • The Journal is pleased to invite submissions for its Volume IX, Issue II. The deadline for sending submissions for the forthcoming volume is July 7, 2021.
  • Submissions must be made in electronic format by filling the form available here.
  • All submissions must be in MS Word format (.doc) or (.docx), with Times New Roman font (Main text: size 12 and line spacing: 1.5, footnotes: size 10, and line spacing: 1).
  • An abstract of not more than 250 words must be provided.
  • Co-authorship (up to 2 authors) is permitted.
  • No biographical information or references, including the name(s) of the author(s), affiliation(s), and acknowledgments should be included in the text of the manuscript, file name, or document properties.
  • Scholasticus uses only footnotes (and not endnotes) as a mode of citation. Submissions must conform to the Bluebook (20th edition) Citation style.
  • Submissions are accepted for publication on the condition that they do not infringe on the copyright or any other rights of any third parties. Any form of plagiarism is strictly discouraged. The manuscript shall be disqualified from consideration of publication in case the plagiarism crosses the threshold of 20% (twenty percent).
  • Submissions made to Scholasticus shall be exclusive and must not be concurrently under consideration by any other publication.

Submission Deadline:

The deadline for sending submissions for the forthcoming volume is July 7, 2021.

Official Brochure:

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About K.L.E. Society’s Law College, Bengaluru:

K.L.E. Society’s Law College, Bengaluru was established in 1975 under the umbrella of Karnataka Lingayat Education Society and has been conceived as a nursery and training ground for those seeking to enter the legal profession. It is recognized by the Bar Council of India and is affiliated with the Karnataka State Law University, Hubbali. K.L.E Society’s Law College, Bengaluru, is ranked as one of the top law colleges across the country by the leading national media houses continuously.

About the Conference:

K.L.E Society’s Law College, Bengaluru, in order to promote critical thinking and research among the legal academia, organizes the National Conference every year. While the first edition of the conference was on the theme ‘Post Liberalization Nuances of Organic Constitution’, the second edition involved deliberations under the theme titled ‘Media: Hopes and Despairs’. The third edition of the conference focused on the theme ‘Transformative Constitutionalism in India’. The present and the fourth edition of the conference is themed on contemporary issues pertaining to Law and Privacy to be held virtually on 24th and 25th July 2021 on the following themes:

Theme 1: Media and Privacy

Theme 2: National Security and Privacy

Theme 3: Privacy and Good Governance

Theme 4: Privacy and Social Relationships

Eligibility:

Professionals, academicians, research scholars and students can participate in this conference.

Registration Details:

Interested participants may register for the conference by visiting the below-given here: https://bit.ly/3feQq9c

Fee Details:

  • Academicians and Professionals: Rs. 500, Co-authorship: Rs. 650.
  • Students: Rs. 250, Co-authorship: Rs.350.
  • Participation is reserved on a first-come and first-serve basis.

Abstract Submission:

The registered participants shall submit their abstract on or before 30th June 2021 to nationalconference[at]klelawcollege.org with the subject line “Abstract – National Conference”.

For full details of the submission, kindly refer to the brochure given at the end of the post.

Important Dates:

  • Last Date of Submission of abstract: 30th June 2021.
  • Confirmation of abstract selection: 04th July 2021.
  • Submission of full paper and registration: 17th July 2021.
  • Dates of Conference: 24th- 25th July 2021.

Publication:

  • Selected papers will be published by KLE Society’s Law College in an edited volume.
  • The paper must be the original work of the author and must not be considered elsewhere for publication.

OFFICIAL BROCHURE:

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Allahabad HC’s Justice Om Prakash VII on Friday rejected the bail application of Bhadohi MLA Vijay Mishra alias Vijay Kumar Mishra, accused of several cases under several sections of Indian Penal Code and IT Act of Gopiganj Police Station in Sant Ravidas Nagar (Bhadohi dist.)

On August 4, 2020, an FIR was lodged by informant Krishan Mohan Tiwari against Ramlali Mishra and Vishnu Mishra, mentioning that applicant is a relative of the informant. After winning the election of block pramukh, he became active in politics. And since 2001, the applicant is alleged to be residing in the informant’s house and is busy with politics and his business without the complete consent of the applicant. He was forcibly residing and threatening and torturing them as he is a relative and presently the elected member of the Legislative assembly from Gyanpur.

The informants’ contractual work was also overtaken by the applicant and started doing all the work along with depositing the money from transactions in the account of his firm and his wife and son. He took possession of all the documents by forcibly getting signed on the cheques and using net banking in the name of the informant. The informant was unaware of all these acts.

The family and informant were threatened with dire consequences as the applicant is a dreaded criminal and the informant was in no position to file a complaint due to threats. The applicant is not only vacating the forcibly occupied house but is also pressuring the informant to execute the will in the name of the applicant’s son. On refusal, threats were extended. Informants’ apprehensions we’re shown in FIR as the applicant is a muscleman. The informant may become landless if the applicant is successful in his acts. A prayer was made to take legal action for securing the life and property of the informant and his family members and was submitted to Chaturvedi, Senior advocate, appearing for the applicant, that no prima facie case is made out against the applicant. The applicant is a reputed person in the Society and was elected four times as MLA. He was also Block Pramukh and President of Zila Panchayat of District Sant Ravidas Nagar.

Referring to the contents of the FIR, it was further submitted that offence under section 449 IPC is not attracted in this matter. Informant himself has admitted in the FIR that the applicant was residing in the said house with the consent of the informant.

It was further argued that if such was the position, offence of criminal trespass cannot be constituted in this matter. Simply it was a dispute of partnership business which is pure of civil nature. Efficacious remedies will be available to the parties in civil suits/arbitration cases. An appeal against the order passed in the arbitration matter is also pending before the Court. Referring to the copy of the Will deed annexed with the application, it was further argued that there was no occasion to obtain a Will deed in favor of Vishnu Mishra, the son of the applicant. The said Will has not been executed. This fact also shows that offences leveled in the matter are not attracted against the applicant.

A Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant also referred to the statement of the witnesses recorded under sections 161 and 164 CrPC and further argued that the applicant is suffering from several diseases. He is in jail since August 14, 2020, and further argued that in all the previous criminal cases against the applicant, they are either withdrawn or the applicant is acquitted. The pending cases are not heinous and some may be due to political rivalry. Also, the disputed property belongs to the applicant exclusively and the said transactions made were done with the complainant’s consent. The applicant should not be kept behind the bars on the grounds of no of cases lodged against him. As a law-abiding person, he was granted bail in 2013 against a criminal trial going considering the entire criminal cases pending against the applicant up to the year 2013.

But as per Additional Advocate General appearing for State and counsel for the informant, the applicant is an influential person and no one dares to lodge an FIR against him and he’s a participant in several heinous cases. The counsel for the informant also argued that no one dares to provide evidence against the applicant hence he was acquitted. The no of cases was withdrawn due to pressure or influence by the govt. Also, the will feed was being executed in the name of Vishnu Mishra, the applicant’s son, only because of pressure created over the informant, but since he left the Registry office, the deed was not executed. Referring to the counter affidavit, it was further argued that a criminal case for the offence under section 376 IPC is also pending against the applicant. If the applicant is enlarged on bail, he will put pressure upon the witnesses. Thus, prayer was made for the rejection of bail.

Thus, having considered the submissions raised across the bar and going through the entire record, and also looking to the nature of allegations leveled against the applicant, the apprehension shown by the informant in the F.I.R. cannot be denied particularly because of criminal antecedents of the applicant.

The Court believes that prayer made for bail in the application is not liable to be allowed and is hereby rejected”, the Court ordered.

-Report by Saksham Srivastava

Applications for the position of ‘Intern’ under the project ‘Transboundary River Governance: Knowledge Product Development and Sharing of Policy Brief’

The Jamsetji Tata School of Disaster Studies (JTSDS) is looking for highly motivated, versatile and competent professionals for its ‘Transboundary River Governance: Knowledge Product Development and Sharing of Policy Brief’ project

Name of Position: Intern (Period: June 17, 2021 to July 17, 2021)
Number of Positions: 1
Qualification: Bachelors in any relevant discipline or Post Graduate
Location: Work from home

Internship Requirements:

  • Knowledge, understanding and aptitude for research around trans boundary water governance and livelihood issues
  • Willingness to play a supporting role in research related tasks as per project requirements
  • Aptitude for reporting and documentation
  • Should be able to join immediately.

Key Roles and Responsibility:

  • Assisting in planning for virtual consultation with relevant stakeholders such as, preparing interview guides, transcribing interviews, data management and other related tasks
  • Conducting literature reviews
  • Drafting reports and documents

Consolidated Remuneration:

Rs. 15,000 /-

About Jamsetji Tata School of Disaster Studies (JTSDS):

The Jamsetji Tata School of Disaster Studies was established in 2006 as an independent centre (The Jamsetji Tata Centre for Disaster Management-JTCDM), consolidating more than 60 year of TISS experience and expertise in disaster relief, response and policy advocacy. JTCDM was elevated to the
status of a School in 2015 with the following three centers : Centre for Disaster Management, Centre of Disasters and Development, and Centre for Geo-informatics. The key domains of the school’s work towards shaping disaster discourse are: Capacity Building, Research, Field Action and Policy Advocacy.

Important Dates: Last date for applications :

15th June, 2021

How to Apply:

CV along with a covering letter is to be mailed to Ms. Pritha Choudhury at
pritha.choudhury@tiss.edu

Project Leader: Dr. Jacquleen Joseph

Official Notification:

https://www.tiss.edu/uploads/files/Internship_Finalised_details1.pdf

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BQ3gYzs6H9Z5SoRYq718zN

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Job Description

About Thomson Reuters Foundation

The Thomson Reuters Foundation is corporate foundation of Thomson Reuters, the global news and information services company. As an independent charity, registered in the UK and the USA, we work to advance media freedom, foster more inclusive economies, and promote human rights. Through news, media development, free legal assistance and convening initiatives, we combine our unique media and legal services to drive systemic change.

We use the combined power of journalism and the law to build global awareness of critical issues faced by humanity, inspire collective leadership and help shape a prosperous world where no one is left behind.

TrustLaw

TrustLaw is the global pro bono service of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. As the world’s leading pro bono legal service, TrustLaw helps high-impact NGOs and social enterprises, to grow, streamline their operations and navigate complex laws and regulations by connecting them with free legal assistance from the best law firms and corporate legal teams around the world. We also deliver groundbreaking legal research on key social and policy issues that our members use to support their advocacy and law reform efforts, and we deliver innovative capacity-building workshops on legal issues across the globe.

Legal projects facilitated through TrustLaw range from everyday operational and commercial matters – such as corporate structuring, intellectual property, non-profit governance or employment advice – to large-scale cross-border legal research projects. Research projects are based on NGO and social enterprise priorities across social or policy issues ranging from freedom of expression and social innovation policy, to human trafficking and data and digital rights, with a growing number in Thomson Reuters Foundation’s focus areas of media freedom, inclusive economies and human rights.

The Role

The Foundation is recruiting a highly skilled and dynamic Legal Programme Manager to grow and strengthen our award-winning TrustLaw programme across Asia. We have a growing presence in the region but see great potential for continuing to broaden and deepen the reach of our service, particularly across the Foundation’s focus areas of media freedom, inclusive economies and human rights. The position would be based in Mumbai and work closely with our Asia Legal Officer, who is based in Mumbai, and our Asia Programme Officer, who is based in Thailand, both of whom provide support to TrustLaw’s activities across the region.

Responsibilities may include:

  • Designing and implementing strategies to expand and strengthen the TrustLaw service, ensuring we serve the best NGOs, social enterprises and legal teams and we deepen TrustLaw’s work across the focus areas of media freedom, inclusive economies and human rights.
  • Managing relationships with key TrustLaw members and facilitating their engagement with the service, through hosting events and regular communications.
  • Scoping legal pro bono requests from our community of NGOs and social enterprises so that the requests clearly explain the legal needs.
  • Managing pro bono requests, including connecting the pro bono client with lawyers and following up with the parties involved.
  • Designing and managing multiple cross-border research programmes that address the most critical social and policy needs facing our NGO and social enterprise members.
  • Line management of a Programme Officer based in Bangkok and a Legal Officer based in Mumbai.
  • Providing leadership or support, as appropriate, in the design, implementation and resourcing of strategic Thomson Reuters Foundation projects in the region or globally.
  • Design and execute a robust communications strategy that includes member events and promotion of TrustLaw publications.
  • Representing TrustLaw and the Thomson Reuters Foundation by speaking publicly about our work at conferences and other events.
  • Maintaining a high profile in Asia by supporting and coordinating events for TrustLaw and the Thomson Reuters Foundation, including working group, panel discussions and workshops, among others.
  • Supporting the team to deliver the TrustLaw Awards and thought leadership projects including the TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono and TrustLaw training courses.
  • Assist with other duties as required.

The candidate

  • An experienced lawyer (5+ years) with strong legal skills and experience in pro bono and in international development or social change
  • Commercial experience with a law firm or in-house would be favourable.
  • A strong understanding of the legal and non-profit sectors in Asia, and an understanding of the challenges and opportunities that pro bono opportunities bring to law firms and legal teams.
  • Proven organisational abilities and experience of managing competing priorities in a fast-paced environment.
  • Extensive experience project managing projects or programming in the charity, non-profit, or pro bono sectors.
  • Extensive experience working with a diverse range of stakeholders, from senior corporate executives and partners of top law firms to social entrepreneurs, NGOs, and any other beneficiaries of our services.
  • Proven experience and knowledge of one or more of Thomson Reuters Foundation’s focus areas (media freedom, inclusive economies and/or human rights)
  • Experience conducting due diligence, monitoring the effectiveness and impact of NGOs and social enterprises.
  • A leader who is able to direct global strategy and manage multiple high-level projects consecutively
  • A strong team player, able to work remotely and communicate effectively with a global team.
  • Experience managing a team.   
  • Experience designing tailored pitches and presentations to a variety of senior commercial stakeholders and articulating social impact in a commercial context.
  • An exceptional communicator with strong writing skills and extensive public speaking experience.
  • Is ambitious, dynamic, and creative.
  • Experience in Salesforce would be favourable.  Experience using and managing information in databases required.
  • Strong understanding and ability to use a range of software tools, including Microsoft Office, CMS, Eventbrite, etc.
  • Fluent in English, other languages favourable.
  • Willingness to travel internationally.

To apply for this position, send your CV and cover letter in English describing how you meet the specifications for this role, what you bring to it, and your availability to start.  Applications without a cover letter will not be considered.

The salary is relative to the local charitable sector in the country of application and will be commensurate with experience. 

More information about Thomson Reuters can be found on thomsonreuters.com

Official Notification:

https://jobs.thomsonreuters.com/ShowJob/Id/525001

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BQ3gYzs6H9Z5SoRYq718zN

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About E-Justice India

E-Justice India is one of the Most Trusted and Popular Legal Website of India. E-Justice India is dedicated to Law Students, Lawyers and Attorneys. It is managed by CSM Partners and Associates LLP (AAS-5840). The aim of E-Justice India is to provide Education in Indian Legal Sector. Through this Portal, we set-up towards Right to Education. E-Justice India provides
Legal News, Legal Articles on latest issues, Leading Case Summary, Law Notes, Free and Advanced Certificate Courses, Free Legal Advice, Success Stories of Advocates, Interview of Advocates & Judges and Information about Upcoming Law Events. We have Approx 250 Campus Ambassadors in many Law Schools across India.

About Workshop:

Topic: Consumer protection and its implications & Consumer Litigation
Consumer protection is the practice of safeguarding buyers of goods and services, and the public, against unfair practices in the marketplace. Consumer protection measures are often established by [law]. Such laws are intended to prevent businesses from engaging in fraud or specified unfair practices in order to gain an advantage over competitors or to mislead consumers. Consumer protection is linked to the idea of consumer rights and to the formation of consumer organizations, which help consumers make better choices in the marketplace and pursue complaints against businesses. The main aim of this workshop is to know more about the concept of Consumer Protection Laws and how it works.

Speaker: MR. MITHIL VINOD SAMPAT, Advocate, High Court of Bombay (Dealing with Consumer and Real Estate matters)
Timing and Dates: 18th and 19th June 2021 at 03:00 PM
Mode of Workshop: Online through Youtube Live.
Perks: Certificate of Participation to every participant.

Registration Link:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe4V4tnEF55ZXJlknguACYh1G-
HlhDSZdRYVHvd0I_KqmlHPQ/viewform

Contact Details:

In case of any queries, feel free to contact us at:
Whatsapp no.: 9097836465
Email: info@ejusticeindia.com

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BQ3gYzs6H9Z5SoRYq718zN

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About Hans & Hans Advocates & Consultants:

We are passionate about delivering outstanding service and working together to ensure our clients get the maximum benefit from the full spectrum of our expertise. These services include hundreds of legal document templates, a team of lawyers on hand for document reviews and legal advice 24/7. From day one to the day-to-day, we can help you build a better business.

Hans & Hans Advocates & Consultants, provide our clients with legal advice and are expert in making transaction stress free as possible whether acting for you, your business, your trust fund or your property portfolio.

Official Website: https://hansandhanslaw.com/index.html

About the job

  • Need Virtual Legal Researcher for Transfer of Property Act.
  • It’s a Remote Internship.
  • Duration is 1 month 16th June till 15 July.
  • Credit of research will be given in Paper publishing.
  • Token Stipend will be paid
  • Firm Certificate will also be provided.
  • Chance to retain in firm to deserving candidates

How to Apply?

Apply with CV at legalrajan@gmail.com or whatsapp at 9700130033

Official Notification:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2596557756/?alertAction=markasviewed&savedSearchAuthToken=1%26AQHKblcRQLhUgQAAAXoIpuhayTWbqib3ajc8gPwXpRIyR15g6kgBckN8qlhcYik1U1lk5kgZobNYuci9ZOziEJjhJha4s2kgW58A5bUCcEeGW1O2_phb9kOb4cx8y6vr-NqylfByksS14A1LS_n8b840VjULrXZ7eFMaXf-mV80fIM_l6E17kcK182zvT239bjGS58HI5iSZVNFYmqHuxCkLzggOj1cc1psVlKLLuXickCc5Uh3QSTu3EvKgea_5F15cWg-P3dDm4GoUFdGHImfOB3p69GHSLgxnGPxmUiBs2dgIuZjWkTRe%26AaaNC5Y3ezQvU0bFIfCXIckGsYKr&savedSearchId=1422822506&refId=20b7479f-5d4f-4524-b31a-7510c59d341b&trackingId=FRALi0mNrR5rpPRND7aZ2g%3D%3D&midToken=AQFTUldLymjkcQ&midSig=2QiyaPXkfFWpM1&trk=eml-email_job_alert_digest_01-job_alert-6-member_details_mercado&trkEmail=eml-email_job_alert_digest_01-job_alert-6-member_details_mercado-null-d83xhd%7Ekpw2ztzf%7E40-null-jobs%7Eview

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BQ3gYzs6H9Z5SoRYq718zN

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

This article is written by Sanjana Suman, a student of Amity Law School, Amity University Jharkhand Ranchi

INTRODCUTION

Initially, the Indian Penal Code dealt with bribery and corruption in situations involving public servants inside the Indian Justice System. However, it was recognised in the 1945s that the current law was insufficient to fulfill the needs, and a need was felt to adopt special laws to combat bribery and corruption. As a result, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 was adopted for the first time.

Based on the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee, the 1947 Act was changed twice: once by the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1952, and again by the Anti-Corruption Laws (Amendment) Act of 1964. The 1947 Act served as a model for the 1988 Prevention of Corruption Act, which comes into force on September 9, 1988. Its goal was to make anti-corruption legislation more effective by broadening their scope and reinforcing the provisions in order to improve the overall statute.

If we cannot make India corruption-free, then the vision of making the nation develop by 2020 would remain as a dream.” – Dr. A.P.J.Abdul Kalam

Corruption

The word “corruption” derives from the Latin term “corrupts,” which means “corrupted.” Corruption is defined as dishonest or deceptive behaviour by those in positions of power, such as government officials or other administrators. Giving or receiving inappropriate gifts and bribes, under-the-table payments, money laundering, and black money, meddling with elections, and defrauding investors are all examples of corruption. India is regarded as one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Following the 2G spectrum lawsuit and the Commonwealth Games Scam in 2010, Parliament resolved to change the Act. The desire for illicit profits, greed for money, and the prevention of furthering any wrongdoing are the main reasons why people engage in corruption so regularly. It has been noticed that unlawful gains, often known as black money, are deposited in Swiss banks or the World Bank in order to make additional black money.

Salient features of the Prevention of Corruption Act 

  • It incorporates the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947, the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1952, and Sections 161 to 165-A of the Indian Penal Code, with minor changes. 
  • It has broadened the scope of definitions such as “public duty” and “public servant” under Section 2 of the act’s defining clause.
  • It has moved the burden of proof from the prosecution to the accused who is charged with the offence, as stated in the CrPC. 
  • The terms of the Act stipulate unequivocally that the investigation must be conducted by an officer with a rank no lower than that of Deputy Superintendent of Police.
  • The 1988 Act broadened the definition of “public servant” to include employees of the central government, union territories, nationalised banks, University Grants Commission personnel, vice-chancellors, professors, and others. 
  • The Act criminalises ‘corrupt’ activities like as bribery, misappropriation, acquiring a monetary advantage, possessing assets disproportionate to income, and so on.

Crimes Punishable by The Prevention of Corruption Act

When a public servant receives money or gifts in exchange for a favour from someone other than their employer, they are not earning their wage.

Any person who assists the public servant in committing the crime.

When a person distributes or receives presents in order to influence a public servant through his personal connections, illegal techniques, or corrupt means, that person’s influence will be made public.

When a government employee is in charge of conducting criminal misbehaviour.

When a public servant accepts bribes or commits corruption with someone with whom he or she has a business or official relationship.

Critical analysis of the Act

The Act’s goal, as amended later, appears to establish a high level of accountability on commercial entities. The Act is based on the contemporary trend of anti-bribery and anti-corruption notions since it provides us with a tool of action expressly for cases of corruption in Public Duties. The provisions of this Act are subject to multiple interpretations, which can only be resolved through more decisions and newer revisions in this area. There are a few highlights of this legislation that have arisen as a result of the recent revisions, which are as follows:

A trial must be completed within four years of the first hearing, according to Section 4 of the Act, although there is no indication of what the deviance might entail. The entire process would be slowed and stalled as a result of this.

Despite the lack of clarity in Section 9 of the Act, it appears to imply that Indian corporations must begin adding anti-bribery provisions into their commercial agreements. 

Sections 7A and 8 of the Act, which primarily deal with excessive benefits in organisations, state that anyone who is involved in corruption, whether a private or public entity, can be penalised.

When an Indian party enters into a contract with another party that engages in corrupt practises with or without the former party’s knowledge, the corporation engaging in corrupt actions may be penalised.

Simply reading the provisions of this Act, it is evident that it is aimed at risk mitigation by implementing rigorous anti-bribery and anti-corruption procedures or rules that are appropriate for our nation in order to eliminate the cancer of corruption from our society.

Landmark Cases under the Act

The question in CBI, Bank Securities & Fraud Cell v. Ramesh Gelli and Others (Writ Petition (CRL.) NO. 167 OF 2015) was what bodies are considered public servants. The Supreme Court of India has ruled that officers of private banks are public officials under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) of 1988. The court further stated that the Act’s goals were to make anti-corruption legislation more effective while also broadening its scope. 

The legality of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was called into doubt in Manzoor Ali v. Union of India (WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 305 OF 2007). The court found that a sanction for prosecution in a corruption case is not unconstitutional since the mere possibility of abuse cannot be used to declare a provision unconstitutional.

In Aiyappa v. Anil Kumar ((2013) 10 SCC 705), the court stated that the purpose of the Act’s provisions is to safeguard an innocent public servant against unjustified and mala fide prosecution.

The 2G Spectrum Case was one of the Act’s major instances, in which telecom spectrum was allocated at a bargain price by the UPA government through fraudulent and illegal ways. The acts were in breach of the Act’s requirements on public duty, and charges were filed against the individuals involved. A special CBI court was convened for the trial, and all of the defendants were acquitted on December 21, 2017.

CONCLUSION 

Corruption is a cancer that is eating away at the core of our society, stifling not only individual growth but also the collective development of our country. 

The Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988 is essential anti-corruption legislation. However, legislation alone will not win the war against corruption; it is the conduct of our legislators that will give us an advantage in combating this scourge. It is also vital to remember that nothing in this universe is perfect, and the same holds true for this Act. It is facing complaints from legal luminaries as a result of the new revisions, but this should be avoided, and legislators should seek to uncover the gaps in the laws and make it as faultless as possible.

Latest Posts


Archives

This article is written by Mudit Jain , pursuing B.B.A.LL.B.(H) from the Indore Institute of Law. This article describes the Organised Crimes in India, in what type they are being conducted and what are the flaws in the control method.

INTRODUCTION 

The sale of unlawful products and services to a large number of citizen clients is the mainstay of organised crime. It is also heavily involved in legal commerce and labour unions. It uses unlawful techniques including as monopolisation, terrorism, extortion, and tax evasion to drive out or control legitimate ownership and leadership, as well as to take illicit profits from the public. Organized crime also corrupts public authorities in order to avoid government intervention and is growing more sophisticated. In India, in addition to the conventional realms of activity like extortion, soliciting protection money, contract killing, bootlegging, gambling, prostitution, and smuggling, drug trafficking, illicit arms dealing, money laundering, and transportation are now involved. Organized crime seeks to obtain power by influencing public authorities and therefore monopolising or near monopolising. Later, the money and power that it generates are utilised to infiltrate the legitimate company and a variety of other linked operations.

Meaning of Organised Crimes

Organised crime is described as “those involved in continuing major criminal actions for large profit elsewhere, usually in collaboration with others.” An organised crime gang is a gang of criminals who work together for the length of a certain criminal activity or activities. Structures of organised criminal groups differ. A stable core of essential persons is commonly seen in successful organised criminal groups. There is a swarm of subordinates, experts, and other temporary individuals surrounding them, as well as an extensive network of disposable allies.

Many organisations are, in reality, informal networks of criminals that band together for the length of a criminal operation, playing various roles based on their abilities and competence. Shared experiences (such as incarceration) or recommendations from reliable persons strengthen collaboration. Others are bound by family or cultural connections — some are even referred to as “criminal families.”

Organized crime employs professionals who provide a service, sometimes to a variety of crime organisations. Transportation, money laundering, debt collection, or the provision of fraudulent papers are examples of services (identity crime supports a wide range of organised crime).

Characteristics of Organised Crimes

Continuity: The criminal organisation exists beyond the lives of individual members and is designed to withstand changes in leadership.

Structure: The criminal organisation is organised as a set of hierarchically ordered interconnected offices each dedicated to the accomplishment of a certain function. It might be very organised or quite flexible. It is distinctive, though, because the rankings are based on power and authority.

Membership in the core criminal group is restricted and based on shared characteristics such as ethnicity, criminal record, or mutual hobbies. Potential members are subjected to extensive inspection and must demonstrate their worth and commitment to the criminal organisation. Membership standards include secrecy, a readiness to perform any act for the organisation, and a desire to safeguard the group. In exchange for allegiance, a member of a criminal organisation receives financial incentives, a certain status, and protection from police authorities.

Criminality: To obtain revenue, the criminal gang relies on ongoing criminal activities. As a result, ongoing criminal conspiracy is inherent in organised crime. Some unlawful activities include the provision of unlawful products and services.

Violence: Violence and the threat of violence are essential components of a criminal organisation. The threat of violence is employed against members of the group to keep them in line, as well as against outsiders to preserve the organization’s economic interests. Members are expected to engage in, condone, or allow violent behaviour.

Power/Profit Goal: The criminal group’s members seek to maximise the group’s profits. Political power is obtained by the corruption of public authorities, such as lawmakers and political executives. The criminal organisation retains power by its affiliation with the “protectors,” who defend the organisation and its earnings.

Legal Position in India on Organized Crimes

In some form or another, organised crime has always existed in India. It has, however, taken on a more virulent form in contemporary times as a result of a variety of socioeconomic and political causes, as well as improvements in science and technology. Although rural India is not immune, it is mostly an urban problem.

Criminal Conspiracy is defined in Section 120-A of the Indian Penal Code as “when two or more persons agree to do or cause to be done-

 (1) an illegal act, 

(2) An act that is not made criminal by using illegal methods. Such an agreement is referred to be a criminal conspiracy.

Except, however, that no agreement, other than an agreement to commit an offence, shall constitute a criminal conspiracy unless one or more parties to such agreement perform some act other than the agreement in pursuance thereof. merely ancillary to that object.”

Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code makes criminal conspiracy a punishable offence.

Dacoity and Related Offences

Dacoity is one of India’s oldest types of crime, conducted solely for the goal of looting or extortion. Dacoity is defined in Section 391 of the Penal Code as:

“When five or more people concurrently commit or attempt to commit a robbery, or when the total number of people concurrently committing or attempting to commit a robbery, and persons present and aiding such commission or attempt amount to five or more, every person so committing, attempting, or aiding is said to commit ‘dacoity.’”

Dacoity is punished by life imprisonment or harsh imprisonment for up to ten years and five months (section 395).

a) criminals preparing to commit debauchery (section 399)

a) Congregation with the aim of committing dacoity (section 402).

c) Section 400 of the Code criminalises the act of belonging to a “gang” of people who are connected for the purpose of committing dacoities on a regular basis.

d) Abduction for ransom, the legislature added Section 364-A to the Indian Penal Code.”

Law on Gangsters

There is no centralised regulation to combat “gang activity” that is applicable across the country. The most populous and politically powerful state, Uttar Pradesh, adopted the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, which is solely applicable in that state. The gang has been defined as a group of people who, individually or collectively, engage in anti-national activities through violence or the threat of violence in order to gain undue political, economic, or physical advantages, and this includes offences against the body, boot-legging, forcible possession of the immovable property, causing communal disturbances, obstructing public servants in the discharge of their duties, and so on. A gangster faces a minimum sentence of two years in jail, which can be increased to ten years (sec. 3). The rules of evidence have been changed, and the trial court can now establish certain statutory presumptions against the criminals. There is an additional provision for the protection of witnesses. At the request of the public prosecutor, the trial may be held behind closed doors. If the Court so wants, the name and address of a witness may be omitted from the court records. The District Magistrate can seize the gangster’s property if he or she believes it was obtained via illegal conduct. This Act has a broad scope and professes to address a wide range of organised criminal conduct.

Other Laws

There are a number of additional major legislation that address certain aspects of organised crime. Some of them are as follows:

  1. The Customs Act, enacted in 1962; 
  2. The Narcotics, Drugs, and Explosives Act; and the Narcotics, Drugs, and Explosives Act.
  3. The Psychotropic Substances Act of 1884;
  4.  The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act of 1956;
  5. 1973 Foreign Exchange Regulation Act
  6. The Public Gambling Act of 1867, and so on.
  7. In addition, the State Government has enacted legislation on topics like as excise, prohibition, and gaming, among others.

Preventive Action

The National Security Act of 1980 authorises preventative detention by the Central Government, State Governments, or personnel designated by this Government. The detention order is given for a year in order to prevent a person from behaving in any way that may jeopardise India’s defence or good ties with foreign states. An Advisory Board led by a sitting High Court judge must authorise the detention. The phrase “security of India” is susceptible to interpretation, and this Act has been utilised, although rarely, against anti-national groups and hard-core gangsters. Detention is an executive measure, and the matter is not heard in court. The illicit trafficking of narcotic narcotics and psychotropic substances endangers people’s health and welfare, and the activities of those involved in such illegal traffic have a destabilising influence on the national economy. Detention is provided for under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1988. The Central Government, the State Government, or designated officers of these governments may issue an order detaining a person in order to prevent him from engaging in illicit drug trafficking. The confinement can be for one year, but it can be extended to two years under specific conditions. As a result, India has legislation strewn about in numerous statutes to deal with various aspects of organised crime. The present rules, however, fall well short of what is required to combat the threat. The Indian government is aware of this and has drafted the Organized Crime Control Act.

The proposed Act defines ‘Organised Criminal Gang’ in a fairly broad sense, including the majority of the important terms.

Typical characteristics of organised crime A gang is defined as “a group of two or more people who commit or attempt to commit or cause to be committed, either individually or collectively, in furtherance of a common object or objects on a continuing basis, for material gain or otherwise, by resorting to the use or display of violence or threat of violence, either direct or implied, or by fraudulent means.”

Murder, bodily injury, smuggling, drug trafficking, abduction for ransom, espionage, triggering bomb explosions, aeroplane hijacking, hostage-taking, mass-murdering, contract killing, gang rapes, extortion, and other significant crimes are included in Schedule I.

Profile of some Organised Criminal Cases

Since ancient times, criminal gangs have operated in India. Thugs’ groups frequently preyed on travellers or wayfarers when travelling lonely regions amid dense rainforests. Thugs travelled in bands, large or small, typically unarmed and disguised as pilgrims, ascetics, or other innocent wayfarers.

Dawood Gang

Dawood is the most powerful of the Bombay criminals, with national and international connections. He is one of the most powerful criminals involved in transnational crimes, namely drug trafficking, smuggling, extortion, and contract killing. He has been a resident of Dubai since 1985. He experienced a meteoric climb in a short period of time. As the son of a Bombay Crime Branch Head Constable, he began as a small criminal and had Bombay Police sympathies owing to his father’s connections.

The Arun Gawli Gang

His group is involved in contract killings and the collecting of protection money from wealthy businesspeople.

Types of Organised Crimes

1. Ransom Kidnapping

Kidnapping for ransom is a well-organized crime in metropolitan areas. There are various local and inter-state gangs active since the financial advantages outweigh the labour and risk required.

2. Contract Homicides

Murder is a capital offence punished by life in jail or death under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. In murder trials, the conviction rate is around 38%. Contract killings have a very low risk of being discovered. Contract killings are carried out by employing a professional gang for a monetary reward.

3. Drug Addiction and Trafficking

It is the country’s most significant organised crime, and it is genuinely multinational in nature. India is strategically located between the nations of the Golden Triangle and the Golden Crescent, and it serves as a transit hub for narcotic substances manufactured in these regions to the West. India also produces a significant amount of licit opium, a portion of which makes its way into the illegal market in various ways. In India, the illicit drug trade revolves around five principal substances: heroin, hashish, opium, cannabis, and methaqualone. Cocaine, amphetamine, and LSD seizures are not uncommon, though they are minor and infrequent.

4. Smuggling

Another important economic infraction is smuggling, which consists of clandestine operations leading to unrecorded transactions. The level of smuggling is determined by the type of the government’s budgetary policy. The kind and quantity of smuggled commodities are also affected by the fiscal policies in place. India has a 7,500-kilometre-long coastline and porous borders with Nepal and Bhutan, making it vulnerable to large-scale smuggling of contraband and other consumable commodities. Though it is impossible to estimate the number of contraband products transported into this nation, the value of contraband confiscated can provide some insight into the scale of smuggling, even if it represents a very small per cent of total smuggling.

5. Hawala & Money Laundering

Money laundering is the process of converting unlawful and ill-gotten money into supposedly legal money in order for it to be absorbed into the legitimate economy. The proceeds of drug-related crimes are a major source of money laundering all around the world. Furthermore, tax evasion and violation of exchange restrictions play a significant part in blending this ill-gotten money with tax evaded income to conceal its origin. This is often accomplished through the laborious stages of placement, layering, and integration, so that the money so integrated into the legitimate economy may be freely utilised by criminals without fear of detection. Money laundering is a severe danger to countries’ criminal justice systems as well as their sovereignty across the world.

Control Efforts have Issues

1. Inadequate Legal Framework

Combating organised crime has a number of challenges. To begin with, India lacks a dedicated law to control/suppress organised crime. As an ongoing conspiracy, instances of organised crime are prosecuted under general conspiracy law and appropriate particular statutes. The current law is insufficient since it focuses on individuals rather than criminal groups or criminal organisations. Conspiracies develop in the shadows, and proving them in court is a tremendous undertaking.

2. Difficulties in Obtaining Evidence

Because organised criminal gangs are hierarchical in nature, the upper tiers of leadership are shielded from police enforcement. It may be feasible to convict the actual perpetrators of crime, but it is difficult to go beyond them in the hierarchy due to evidentiary regulations, notably the inadmissibility of confessions made by offenders before they are convicted. Witnesses are unwilling to testify because they fear for their life, and there is no law to protect witnesses from organised gangs. The informers are reluctant to come forward since there is a stigma linked to being an ‘informer.’

3. A scarcity of Resources and Training

The police are the subject of the State in our constitutional framework. The investigation of cases, their prosecution, and the establishment of criminal tribunals is the duty of each state government. Most states are facing a budget constraint and are unable to provide appropriate funding to criminal justice system agencies. The number of police officers stationed in police stations is insufficient. Furthermore, there are few training facilities for investigating organised crime.

4. Criminality on both counts

National borders are not respected by criminal syndicates. Certain crimes, notably drug trafficking, are planned in one location and carried out in another. Criminals also migrate quickly from one section of the world to the next. Various countries have different legal systems. In one nation, an act may be considered a criminal, but not in another. Money laundering, for example, is a felony in the United States and some European nations but not in India.

5. Coordination Deficit

There is no national-level entity in India that coordinates the operations of state/city police organisations as well as central enforcement authorities in combatting organised crime. Furthermore, no agency exists to gather, consolidate, analyse, document, and serve as a clearinghouse for information pertaining to transnational and inter-state gangs operating in India and overseas. Similarly, at the national and state levels, there is no structure of systematic pursuit of selected gangs. Aside from a lack of institutional framework, there are coordination issues between the Central Government and the State Governments, as well as between one State Government and another State Government, due to variations in political attitudes.

Latest Posts


Archives