Month: September 2020

About WJNS

World Justice Network Society (WJNS) is a community driven social project with a goal to disrupt the inefficiencies in the justice delivery system across the world.

About the Opportunity

In order to propel their various programs for Republic of India, World Justice Network Society (WJNS) is inviting applications from law students/interns from various states and territories of India to apply for internship opportunities.

Role and Responsibilities

Collect data and public records via Right to Information ( RTI ) or Access to Information ( ATI ) acts of various jurisdictions such as:

• National/Federal, Provincial/State, District, City level government bodies (Ministries, departments, commissions.

•  Government funded bodies such as Commissions, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs etc.).
• Draft RTI Application.
• Submit to appropriate via Registered AD.
• Follow up on responses at appropriate times
• Receive responses, and

• Analyze the response for fit to purpose, reasonableness, completeness, deviations etc.
•  Scan and upload responses into our system.
• Escalate to the Higher Authorities (appeals) in case of lapses in RTI process.

•  Draft public communication press releases in case of lapses.
• Analyze responses, make use of the responses and devise further strategies in conjunction with the team.

Eligibility

Law Students

Skills Required

• Very good interpersonal skills

• Very good analytical, writing and organizational skills
• Ability to perform in a cross-functional team approach and job responsibilities
• Ability to work in an international environment
• Ability to think out of the box and propose creative solutions
• Advanced formatting skills in MS Word, Excel & PowerPoint, Publisher
• Working knowledge of Google Suite is an asset

How to Apply

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Feminism as a concept emerged in the society in the late 1960’ and early 1970s. Before this, the notion of equal rights for all was missing the sphere. The prevalent norm was and is still continuing is the dominance of men is out society. Domination by men is deep-rooted and well established in the world. Feminism still needs to firmly hold the ground.

There are different schools of feminism in the world. Radical feminism is one where a violent means is used to put forward oneself. Liberal feminism is demanding the abolition of public and private dichotomy. Marxist or socialist feminism wants the class struggle between men and women to come to an end. Then there is Criminology feminism which projects the issues affecting women in regard to crime in the public domain.

The late 1960 to mid-1970 saw the development of feminist criminology. The rise of feminist criminology can be ascribed to the second wave of women’s liberation development that assisted with anticipating issues influencing ladies concerning crimes in the public area. The issue of women and crime was basically examined and seen from the male viewpoint. Feminist viewpoints in criminology have had an extraordinary effect on the overall comprehension of ladies as two parts (a) culprits and (b) survivors of wrongdoing. The connection between feminism and criminology is inserted with the rich investigation of strategies, order, epistemology, and strategy. Researchers in the field of criminology have throughout years put to scrutinize a portion of the gender- blind supposition in criminology all together make space for the voices and encounters of ladies. There are different contentions put across by ladies in the field of criminology that offer a comprehensive perspective concerning ladies as casualties or culprits of the crime.

Throughout the years, feminist points of view in criminology have tested the current speculations, ideas, presumptions and techniques. For example, Carol Smart 1976, a critique of British criminology saw that ladies represent an exceptionally little level of offenders and subsequently center has been given around the issue of ladies and crime. Also, the issue of ladies and crime had been seen regarding the generalizations related to their mental and biological nature. Smart contends that ladies are oppressed on the grounds of sex; in this manner, there are sexism impacts that decide condemning, detainment of ladies and discipline. She accuses the adjudicators, police and faculty in the criminal equity frameworks for the generalization accept that a woman could be frantic on the off chance that they conflict with their biological nature of latency or consistence and perpetuate certain crimes (Pickering and Alder 2000).

Concerning the sentiments of Spelman (1988), feminist hypotheses on crime have ignored the issue of distinction. She contends that feminists have focused on the figure of a special lady consequently the cliché attitude toward female guilty parties. Then again, Freda Adler (1975) partners the 1970 second flood of women’s liberation to the sensational upsurge of ladies in crimes. Adler contends that while ladies battled for the equivalent open door as their male partners, the decided ladies constrained their way into the scene significant crimes, for example, burglary, murder, and middle-class violations. Adler further builds up that as ladies are ascending the collaborate business stepping stool this changing nature summons their wide association in crimes (Alder 1995).

In 1979 Cerkovich and Giordano led examines that included ladies between 17 to 29 years. The discoveries of these examinations built up that the more freed the member’s reaction to questions the less deficient they were. For example, they found that the ladies who react that lady ought to be associated with the work power rather than stay at home doing homegrown tasks were the least reprobate. An examination of ladies’ detainees further uncovered that an enormous level of these ladies originated from uninformed and devastated foundations. When requested the intentions behind their culpable these ladies didn’t have all the earmarks of being freed. Accordingly in spite of Adler’s hypothesis on liberation similarity likewise represents a chance to annoy.

Farrington (1983) found that ladies were exposed to less serious disciplines when contrasted with their male partners. It was likewise found that ladies will in general perpetrate less genuine violations utilizing less brutality. Besides, feminists in the field of criminology use protections, for example, postnatal depression as an explanation for their culpable. Biological reasons have been referred too much of the time of female guiltiness thus, the general public has disregarded the conservative and social purposes for female culpable (Gelsthorpe and Morris 1990).

Then again, ladies have been regular casualties of crimes. Feminist authors in the field of criminology have rushed to bring up that due to their weak mental and biological nature of ladies are bound to be survivors of crime when contrasted with their male partners. Ladies are bound to capitulate to violations, for example, attacks and abusive behavior at home among numerous different crimes. Women’s activists in the field of criminology contend that criminal equity frameworks have dismissed the exploitation of ladies. They rush to bring up that three out of four ladies will be casualties of crime during their lives. Feminists further contend that these figures have been overlooked in this way respecting female misuse. Past ages of ladies endured peacefully be that as it may after some time ladies have picked up force and therefore wrongdoings against ladies are progressively been accounted for (Alder 1995).

Until the second half of the 20th century, most criminological findings focused on male offenders and the criminal justice system responses to male crime. The inefficient attention to female offending stemmed from the fact that most crimes was committed by males. However, by the previous two decades of the 20th century, female imprisonment rates were skyrocketing, leading to a surge in research on girls, women, crime, and the criminal justice system. Many researchers point to the “war on drugs” and the federal sentencing reforms of the 1980s as the primary explanations of the huge increase in female prisoners as well as of the emergence of feminist criminological scholarship. They are instead found in second-wave feminism as well as in the radical criminology of the 1960s and the 1970s.

Feminist criminological thought gained eminence during the highly political era of the 1960s and 1970s. At first, the field focused on the absent information on girls and women in criminological scholarship. As the field grew, the center shifted to include violence against women as well as the development of feminist criminological theories and feminist ways of approaching existing theories. A broad base of scholarship has been amassed from the women’s liberation movement, critical theories, and radical feminism.

Latest Posts

• Job opportunity at EXO Edge, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!
• Internship opportunity at Vishwas Advisors, Kalyan, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Internship opportunity at Kulfi Collective, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!
• Job opportunity at The Neotia University, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India: Apply Now !!
• Job opportunity at Morgan Stanley, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at VISA INTELLIGENCE CONSULTANCY LLP, New Delhi, Delhi, India: Apply Now!!  
• Job opportunity at Amazon Web Services (AWS), Gurugram, Haryana, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Stelcore Management Services Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Zscaler, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at Irish Expert, Delhi, India: Apply Now!!
• Job opportunity at UnitedLex · Gurgaon, Haryana, India: Apply Now!
• Internship opportunity at Vineforce · Nabha, Punjab, India: Apply Now!!

---

• ACEDY (1)
• CLAT-Peeps! (10)
  • Current Affairs (2)
• competitions (132)
• Conferences and Seminars (201)
  • Webinar (1)
• Course and Workshops (107)
• Debates (46)
• DEGY (1)
• Eassy Competitions (69)
• Fellowships & Scholarships (56)
• Guest Blogs (6)
• important (29)
• Internships and Jobs (2,317)
• interviews (8)
• LEGY (1)
• moot court (180)
• Opportuintes (2,731)
  • Job Opportunity (1,191)
• opportunity (2,559)
  • Call for papers (475)
  • Quizes,fests and others (298)
  • Work Opportunity (836)
• Our Blog (1,049)
  • Administrative Law (17)
  • ADR (13)
  • Arms Act (2)
  • Case Analysis (205)
  • Company law (36)
  • Constitutional Law (143)
  • Consumer Protection Act (17)
  • Contract Law (62)
  • CPC (10)
  • Criminal Law (140)
  • Cyber Law (13)
  • Environmental Laws (30)
  • Evidence Act (20)
  • Family Law (12)
  • General (205)
  • International Humanitarian Law (8)
  • International law (23)
  • IPR (10)
  • Jurisprudence (13)
  • labor laws (7)
  • Maritime Laws (1)
  • Partnership Act (2)
  • personal law (33)
  • Taxation (10)
  • Tort (64)
  • Transfer of Property (2)
• Our Services (11)
  • career advice (2)
  • others (6)
• Top Stories (524)
• Uncategorized (720)

Archives

• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• November 2019

LexForti Legal Journal [ISSN: 2582 – 2942] is a free open access peer-reviewed journal, which gives insight into broad and dynamic legal issues. The objective of LexForti is to provide open and free access to legal databases to everyone. LexForti is highly committed to helping law students to get their research articles published and an avenue to the aspiring students, teachers and scholars to make a contribution to the legal sphere. LexForti revolves around the firmament of legal issues; consisting of corporate law, family law, contract law, taxation, alternative dispute resolution, IP Laws, Criminal Laws, and various other Civil issues.

Call for Papers

LexForti Legal Journal is inviting submissions for its Volume 2, Issue 1. Authors will be provided: A Certificate of Publication. Author of the best paper would be awarded a cash prize worth of Rs. 10,000/-.

Theme

Submission must be related to any Socio-legal issues.

Submission Guidelines

• It should be in MS Word format.

• There shall be an appropriate title of the manuscript.
• The manuscript shall be original and unpublished.
• The submission shall be grammatically correct, non-plagiarized and free from any spelling mistakes.
• There shall be a uniform method for citation in the manuscript.
• The body of the manuscript shall be in Garamond, font size 12, 1.5 line spacing. Footnotes should be in Garamond and size 10, with single line spacing.

Word Limit

• Articles: (2000 – 8000 words including footnotes)

• Short Notes: (1000-3000 words including footnotes)
• Book Reviews: (1000-2000 words including footnotes)
• Case Commentaries: (800-2000 words including footnotes)

How to Submit?

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaUDz4eKEx0QBBqFDFx0aNmgMjoanlXYduYgGikc4qiQn1Fw/viewform?gxids=7628

Important Dates

• Last date of submission of Manuscript: 6th October 2020

• Last date of payment of processing fee: 7th October 2020
• Date of Publication: Within 48 hours after confirmation for the Publication of Manuscript
• Date of Issue of Certificate: Within 48 hours of publication.

Publication Fee

The fee is to be paid after the acceptance of the Manuscript.

Single Authored manuscript: Rs. 900/-

Co-authored manuscripts (Max. 2, including the author): Rs 1500/-

Payment Mode

• Bank Name: Andhra Bank

• Account Number: 216310100028863
• Account Holder Name: Rohit Pradhan
• Branch Name: Mamidipalli
• IFSC Code: ANDB0002163
• PAYTM/GOOGLE PAY/PHONEPE: 8757182705

Contact Details

Mr. Rohit Pradhan

Phone/WhatsApp: +91 8757182705 (Rohit); +91 8500832102 (Sridhruti)

Email: lex.fortii[at]gmail.com

Theme: The impact of the Pandemic on the legal Framework

The COVID 19 Pandemic has disrupted all aspects of human life to unimaginable proportions, globally. The actual impact of the economic slide and massive layoffs can be seen within the next two years.  The Pandemic has also exposed how weak health care systems are, even in developed countries, to handle a health crisis of this magnitude. The worst hit have been the people of the unorganised sector, who unfortunately, are always at the receiving end of such calamities. Social isolation, which seems to be the new normal, has also impacted individuals psychologically. According to the National Commission for Women, domestic violence has increased during this period. Courts too have been forced to go on the virtual mode.  The Pandemic has also seen  gross Human Rights violations across the globe. In this context, Christ University Law Journal, invites submissions for its Special Issue on ‘The impact of the COVID 19 Pandemic on the legal framework’ from jurists/ political scientists/ economists/ sociologists/ scholars/activists//academicians/industry experts and researchers to engage in academic deliberations on the said issue.  This special issue seeks to invite research articles having qualitative or quantitative research method approach, with a focus on any contemporary topic relating to the impact of Covid-19 on Law, Policy and Society. Some of the indicative sub-themes have been mentioned below:

• State Accountability and Responsibility in times of Crisis
• Impact of COVID 19 on Centre- State Relations
• Impact of COVID 19 on Public-Private Health Sector, and Public Health Crises
• Rights of health care workers, including the right to personal protective equipment
• Impact of COVID 19 on Mental Health and Adequacy of Legal Framework and Policy
• Employment Concerns and Rights of Migrant Workers
• Competition Law Concerns in times of COVID-19 Pandemic
• Gender Dimension of COVID-19 and rise in domestic violence
• Right to reproductive health care during times of crisis
• Impact of COVID-19 on service delivery in education and related challenges
• Impact of COVID-19 on Data Privacy and Protection
• Right to privacy and contact tracing during COVID-19
• Force Majeure  and COVID 19
• Impact of COVID 19 on court proceedings
• COVID-19, natural disasters and environmental concerns
• Please send your articles (5000-6000 words )following the guidelines mentioned in our website at the latest by 30 September, 2020. Kindly include the abstract of the article in 150-200 words, 5 Keywords and a summary of the CV of the author in 100-150 words. Details of submission are on the webpage. You should submit the articles through
• DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: SEPTEMBER 30^th  2020

Click here to submit.

About UN Volunteering

• United Nations (UN)  Online Volunteers will support the OHCHR Regional Office for Southern Africa in fulfilling its mission: To work for the protection of all human rights for all people.
• To help empower people to realize their rights.
• To assist those responsible for upholding such rights in ensuring that they are implemented.

About the Task

The volunteer’s tasks would include the following:

• Support trainings, consultations and other activities on country human rights issues.
• Conduct research, analysis, data collection and prepare analytical briefs and updates.
• Support engagement with human rights mechanisms by States, civil society organizations and national human rights institutions.
• Support technical assistance to States, civil society and national human rights institutions on implementation of human rights recommendations.
• Support engagement with UN country teams in the sub-region.
• Support human rights early warning in the sub-region.
• Support awareness raising about human rights and the work of the UN.
• Drafting reports, communications, note-taking.
• Perform other duties requested by supervisor, as appropriate.

Eligibility

The candidate must:

• Be enrolled or have graduated with a Masters or equivalent degree OR

• Have graduated from a first-level university degree (Bachelors or equivalent) in a field relevant to human rights (law, political science, social sciences, international relations, etc).
• Work Experience relevant to human rights and in Southern Africa is desirable.
• Language: Excellent written and spoken English is required.
• Knowledge of French, Portuguese or other languages from Southern Africa is an asset.

Number of Volunteers Needed

2

Duration

26 Weeks/ 20+ Hrs. Per Week

CLICK HERE TO APPLY.

Home of Youth for Development and Rendering Awareness (H.Y.D.R.A) is a trust created by young and energetic undergraduate students from different colleges towards contributing to education and to increase political and social awareness among youth by organizing various like Mock Parliament, Debates, Exhibitions, Symposium etc. It is a non-profit, non-political and secular trust.

About the Internship

• To write articles and blogs based on Socio-Legal Contemporary issues

• The intern is expected to write 4-5 blogs and 1 article in a month.
• The content submitted by the concerned person must be their original work.

Location

Online (Work from Home)

Eligibility

• Any student in his/her 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th year of 5-year Law course and 2nd or 3rd year for 3-year Law course can apply.

• The students pursuing a master’s degree in the field of law may also apply.
• Any student or person belonging to any other field may also apply given an inclination towards writing on the socio-legal aspects.

Duration

1 Month (can be further extended for a period of 1 month based on performance).

Perks

• Certificate of Experience to Candidates who complete their Term.
• Certificate of Appreciation to Candidates showcasing exceptional performance.

Stipend

The position is purely voluntary and no stipend will be given for the same.

Number of Vacancies

5 (Five)

How to Apply?

Please send your CVs along with A Writing Sample to contact[at]hydratrust.in and mention your name, contact number, year of study, name of the college, your course, in the body of the email itself.

The subject of the mail should be “Application for Content Writer”.

Last Date to apply: 5th October 2020

Contact Information

In Case of any queries feel free to reach us at contact[at]hydratrust.in

Arvind Bhati: 9205510739

Kanishq Mishra: 96501 71443 CLICK HERE FOR THE WEBSITE

The three judges bench of the Supreme Court on Saturday disposed the appeal and contempt petition filed against the judgement of the Delhi High Court dated 24.12.2019.The bench consisted of Justice Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah.

The appellant was represented by the learned senior Counsel Shri Sachin Datta and the respondent was represented by the learned Solicitor General Shri Tushar Mehta.

Appellant’s Contention

It was submitted that the order of the Delhi High Court dated 02.07.2019 has not been complied by the respondent. It was submitted that the respondents were required to issue order in regard to inter-cadre transfer of the appellant as State of Haryana has given consent for transfer. It was not open for the respondent to ask for consent of the appellant with regard to the Sate of Nagaland, Manipur and Andhra Pradesh for inter-cadre transfer of the appellant. It was further submitted that the inter-cadre transfer in the case of the appellant is on account of the extreme hardship to the appellant. By considering the case of extreme hardship a large number of officers, IAS officer, Central Government has always accommodated at their choice. He submits that letter dated 13.12.2019 was contemptuous and the Delhi High Court ought to have initiated contempt petition which erred in rejecting the same.

Respondent’s Contention

It was submitted that under the order of the Delhi High Court dated 02.07.2019 it was the Central Government who was to take decision regarding inter-cadre transfer of the appellant as per the law. If a request on the ground of threat is made the Central Government may initially send the officer on three years deputation of State of its choice. He submits that the choice is of the Central Government where the officer is to be sent from one cadre to another cadre. It was further submitted that no contempt was committed by the respondent in issuing the letter dated 13.12.2019. The appellant cannot be sent to a State of his choice, it is the prerogative of Central Government to take decision in which inter-cadre transfer is to be affected.

Key Highlights

• Case name: Dr. Jitendra Gupta v. Dr. Chandramouli, IAS (Secretary, DoP&T, Government of India) with Contempt of Court Petition No. 416 of 2020 (Dr. Jitendra Gupta v. Dr. C. Chandramouli.
• This was Civil Appeal No(s). 3298 of 2020.

Court’s Decision

After hearing both the sides the Court disposed the appeal and expressed its views:

• Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted the observation made in paragraph 43 of the Delhi High Court judgement that State of Haryana is the home State of the appellant was incorrect and the home State of the appellant is U.P. which cannot be disputed.
• Present case was not a case of any willful disobedience of the direction of the High Court dated 02.07.2019 and the High Court rightly refused to initiate contempt proceedings.

Under the order passed by the Delhi High Court dated 02.07.2019, the appellant’s inter-cadre transfer under Rules 1954 is to be affected by the Central Government. The proceedings of the inter-cadre transfer are awaiting finalization for the last more than two years. There is no doubt that it is the Central Government which is authority competent to transfer the appellant from one cadre to another. The appellant cannot insist that he should be transferred to the State of Haryana. However, a liberty has been granted to the appellant to make a fresh representation to the Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India in reference to letter dated 13.12.2019 within two weeks from today with regard to his inter-cadre transfer in light of judgement of Delhi High Court dated 02.07.2019. It shall be open for the appellant to give his consent/willingness with regard to any other state.

INTRODUCTION

Recently Bombay High Court held that prostitution is not an criminal offence under the immoral traffic (prevention) Act,1956  and every adult woman has the fundamental right to choose their vocation. The Justice Prithvi Chavan  of  Bombay High Court ordered to release three sex worker  immediately who has been detained in a corrective home for almost one year and said prostitution by itself was not an offence and did not entail a punishment, instead its public solicitation was the offence defined under the Act . The court ordered to release them immediately.

      FACTS

• The plea was filed by the three women challenging an order passed by the metropolitan magistrate, Mazgaon, that had upheld their detention at a local correctional facility against her will.
• The mothers and other legal guardians of the three women approached the magistrate’s order.
• The petition was filed under Section  of CRPC in order to quash the entire proceedings in crime registered under section 370 of IPC and section 3,4,5 and 7 of the Immoral traffic (prevention) Act.
• The petitioner who approached the Karnataka high court was a customer in a brothel in Bengaluru, the petitioner was arrested but later was released.
• The Durbar Mahila Samanwaya committee, a collective of 65,000 sex workers believes that arrest of customers happen regularly and they often get off the hook after paying some money.

The petitioners counsel submitted that the  lower court committed gross error of law in framing charge against accused/petitioner.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

• The High court ordered release of three women sex workers detained at a corrective centre for almost one year.
• Justice Prithvi Chavan said the immoral traffic (prevention) Act does not abolish prostitution.
• Only sexual exploitation of a person for commercial purposes is a criminal offence under the act.

COURT’S DECISION

The Bombay High Court contended that as the victims are not being prosecuted there is no question of continuing their detention in the custody of Navjeevan Mahila Vastigruha or with any other institution and hence Bombay High Court ordered to release all three sex workers who was detained earlier. The court also said that the women were adults and entitled to their fundamental right to move freely and choose their own vocation. It further stated that there was nothing on record to show that the petitioners were seducing any person for the purpose of prostitution or that they were running a brothel. There is no provision under the law which makes prostitution per se a criminal offence or punishes a person because she indulges in prostitution. But this entire verdict also lies the aspect of physical exploitation.

The order also stated that section 370(that deals with physical exploitation) and its amendment following the December 16, 2012, gang rape will not be applicable if sex workers are engaged in prostitution of their own volition. The law was amended in 2013 and Section 370A was introduced and as per the amendment a person can be held liable within the mischief of this offence if he either recruits, transports, harbours , transfers or receives a person or persons. The decision came after Delhi gang rape case.

The judge while quashing the case said – “ it is felt by this court that the customer virtually encourages prostitution, and exploit the victim for money, but in the absence of any specific penal provision, it cannot be said that he is liable for any prosecution for the above said offences”.

LawPublicus

LawPublicus is a leading journal of multidisciplinary research. It is a free, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that provides insight into diverse and dynamic legal matters. We are focused on helping law students get their exclusive research articles published and an avenue to the budding-lawyers, academicians and scholars to make a contribution to the legal arena.

PUBLICATION POLICY

LawPublicus calls for distinctive and unpublished Blogs, Research-Papers & Articles, Short Notes, Book Reviews & Case Summaries on rolling basis. A Call for paper is issued in the interest of the author(s) to inform about the same. 

COPYRIGHT

Once a submission is selected for publication, the Author(s) is required to pay the requisite fees for publication, and copyright of the submission(s) shall be transferred to LawPublicus. A form is to be signed by the Author, which shall be forwarded once the submission is selected for publication. However, moral rights of the article shall remain with the author(s) but have to adhere to common creative license stated under open access policy. Also, the Intellectual rights of the article reside with the Author. 

WITHDRAWAL OF SUBMISSION

To withdraw a submitted manuscript, the Author(s) is required to inform the Editor-in-Chief via mail. The Portal has no objection to such requests. However, the fees paid will not be refunded because we give ample of time to the Author to decide whether they want to publish their research-work with us and to make the payment of requisite fees. Also, once a manuscript has been published, it cannot be removed or withdrawn. It is requested that the author(s) convey their request well in advance.

CONTENT

The Portal allows entries pertaining to legal work or purely social analysis of a subject matter relevant in the field of law. However, posts that establish an inter-discipline between law and other other areas are preferred. 

The entries must showcase the original work of the author that adds to the present literature on the subject-matter. All the authors are requested to send only original and unpublished content. Additionally, all submissions must contain some novel analysis comprised of the author(s)’ views and which adds to the existing literature on the subject but must not be a simple descriptive or informative piece, or a compilation of content from different sources. 

The submissions which are approved in a review shall go through the necessary process of Plagiarism check.​

COVER LETTER

All the submissions must be sent to Lawpublicusportal@gmail.com.All submissions must be accompanied by a cover letter containing the

• Name of the author(s),
• Institutional affiliation,
• Title and category of the submission, 
• Contact address of the author, including email address and contact number.

STYLE GUIDELINES

LawPublicus acknowledges and accepts all the materials that are original work of the author(s) and deals with every of law.

• The manuscript should be in MS Word format.
• The manuscript shall be original and unpublished.
• The title of the manuscript should be appropriate.
• The submission should not be plagiarised  and free from grammatical errors, spelling mistakes and other errors.
• Full names of all the author(s) must be given clearly.
• Any uniform method for citation may be followed.
• A title page with the title of the article and author’s contact details (Name, Designation, Postal address, Phone, and E-mail).
• 200-250 words abstract is mandatory.
• The heading & body of the manuscript shall be in Times New Roman, font size 12, 1.5-line spacing.
• Footnotes should be in Times New Roman, size 10 and single line spacing. 
• A margin of 4 centimetres shall be left on all sides of the paper.

NOTE

• Manuscripts received after the deadline will be strictly rejected.
• Contributions will only be considered for publication if they comply with the style guide as provided hereinabove. If an author is uncertain of the correct style for the citation of a reference, the relevant reference should be highlighted in yellow. Once a manuscript is accepted, an author will be asked to revise it in line with the suggestions provided by the peer-review committee.

All submissions must be directed: Lawpublicusportal@gmail.com

THEME

Any appropriate theme related to current socio-legal aspect is acceptable.

WORD LIMIT (SUBJECT TO RELAXATION)

• Long Articles – 3,500 to 5,000 words
• Short Articles – 2,500 to 3,500 words
• Article Review – 2,500 to 4,000 words
• Case Summaries – 2,500 to 3,000 words
• Book Reviews – 2,500 to 3,000 words
• Special Articles – 75,00 to 10,000 words

OPEN ACCESS

LawPublicus follows an open-access model. The manuscripts published in the journal can be accessed on the website without any subscription cost. Subscribers are free to read, download, copy, print, distribute, link the published work to other articles. No subscription cost is to be paid.

About the Organisation

The Centre for Criminal Justice Administration [CCJA], Dr. RML National Law University, Lucknow was established in the year 2008. Its aim is to dichotomously promote students’ and researchers’ interest and influence in the academic discipline and practical application of criminal law.

About the Blog

The Centre also manages a blog that accepts academically-oriented submissions, both in the sole discipline of criminal law or intertwined with other socio-legal disciplines, on a rolling basis from members of the legal fraternity.

Dr K.A. Pandey has been kind enough to accept the position of Editor-in-Chief of the blog and guide us in establishing the blog as a hallmark of quality. In addition, open-to-all interactive seminars that promote dynamic debate and discussion are frequently hosted with eminent guest speakers.

Theme

The Centre for Criminal Justice Administration’s [CCJA] Blog is intended to promote legal scholarship in the field of Criminal law (Both substantive and Procedural) and allied interdisciplinary discussions.

How to Submit?

They are inviting submissions on a rolling basis throughout the calendar year from members of the bar, legal professionals, law students, or others who are interested in publishing with us and wish to further legal discourse.

Submission Guidelines

• The article should be an original work of the author and neither published nor under consideration for publication in any other journal or blog. The work must not be plagiarized.
• Co-authorship (limited to 2 authors) is allowed for the articles.
• They prefer an article with 1200-1500 words. Articles with words exceeding 2000 shall not be considered as a general rule, except under special circumstances subject to the sole discretion of the Editorial Board. In case author(s) want(s) to roll out a series of blogs, the decision on the word limit shall be taken by editorial board accordingly.
• The content should be written in TIMES NEW ROMAN font with a size of 12 and line spacing is to be maintained at 1.5.
• The article must be submitted in a .doc/.docx format to ccjarmlnlu[at]gmail.com.

Contact Information

Address: Centre for Criminal Justice Administration, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow, 226012.

Email ID: ccjarmlnlu[at]gmail.com

Sushant: +91 83187 58559

Akanksha: +91 6396 476 980