Author: LEXPEEPS editor

The Lakshadweep Development Plan and its Effects on the Environment

Posted on

Introduction:-

The administrator of the union territory is appointed by the president under Article 239. The current administrator of Lakshadweep Island is Praful Khoda Patel since last December 2020. He is also the current administrator of union territory Dadar and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu appointed by the President of India Ram Nath Kovind. People are protesting in the union territory and the reason behind the protest is due to the change of Administration. He introduced many bills which directly or indirectly violate the fundamental rights of the people.

What is Happening in Lakshadweep:-

The citizens of Lakshadweep are protesting against the administrative reforms brought by Mr. Praful Patel. Mr. Praful Patel introduced “The Anti-social activities regulation bill, 2021” or “The Goonda Act” and “The Lakshadweep Animal Prevention regulation” and “The Lakshawdeep development authority regulation”. These bills and regulations were introduced in the mid-covid scenario. The people are protesting against the decision to allow liquor sale on the island, the ban on beef, and the plan to disenfranchise islanders on certain counts. Mr. Praful’s tenure saw the descend from being a Covid-free region for nearly a year into starting with 6,800 cases until May 24. This all happened due to the provisions made by the administrator to remove the mandatory quarantine time period.

The Environmental Concerns:-

Lakshadweep MP says that the Draft LDA regulations are neither ecologically sustainable nor socially viable. The Development Projects are for-profit motive and concretization of the Island will hurt its pristine ecology. The people’s representatives were not consulted before drafting it. And at the high time of this Covid-19 first wave in the region, there is no such reason to bring it in regulations at the moment. In a biodiversity survey of 2017, one of the Parali islands has been eroded to an extent of 100%. And the other part of the island is also having a high erosion rate. And construction of new things or Concrete Jungle or a high rate of tourism will affect the land to a great extent. The people say that at this time the island needs to be preserved not to be developed. 

Lakshadweep Development Authority Regulation (LDAR), 2021:-

According to this regulation, the administrator can remove or relocate the people of islanders from their properties without their will. The authority can take any area from the islanders except cantonment areas.

This regulation directly violates their right to possess and retrain their property. It violates Article 21 which says that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal property. Development can be of any type such as building, mining, quarrying, engineering, railways, airports,  national highways etc. 

Article 240 of the Constitution

LDAR enacted through this article of the Constitution. Under this article, the president has the power to make regulations for the peace, progress, and the benefit of the people of the union territory.

Elamaram Kareem CPI(M)’s Rajya Sabha MP from Kerala says Patel only wants to acquire the land of the islander and give it to the big corporators he also wrote a letter to President Ram Nath Kovind requesting him urgently call back Patel.

The Police are Demolishing Fishing Harbours

The police under Patel are demolishing the fishing Harbour labeling it as an unauthorized settlement the main occupation of the islander is pisciculture. Poor people are being harassed by this type of all-new rule. Most of the places in India is hit by the cyclone Tauktae, Lakshadweep also hit by this cyclone and it caused great damage to the fishermen as their boats and instruments were damaged by the cyclone and they were unable to place their boat in the shed as the sheds were demolished by the police.

The gear of the fisherman was set on fire they have done this crucial thing at Midnight when the people were sleeping and they were also forced to remain inside their homes as curfew is imposed in the union territory. This caused damages to the fisherman, many of them lost their boats and sheds as well. Fishermen lost their livelihood, and authority is not providing any type of help to the poor people.

Introduction of a Liquor Shop on the Island

On many islands of Lakshadweep consuming liquor is allowed, this new rule allows many foreigners to enter the island and consume liquid. This rule again hurts the religious feeling of the people.

The Lakshadweep Panchayat Regulation, 2021

Under this regulation, the person who has more than two children was disqualified from the election of the gram panchayat. Article 243F says that only a person who is qualified to the state legislature shall be qualified to be chosen as a member of a panchayat only the difference is of age criteria. This is nothing else more than misleading propaganda.  Again this regulation violates the right of the citizens. By this regulation Article 14 of the Constitution is violated.

This regulation will not apply to those parents who have two children before this regulation came into effect but those who will have two children in the future will not eligible for the contest of the gram panchayat election.

Conclusion

The protests have erupted on Lakshadweep Island because of many reasons, it is the first time in the history of Lakshadweep that these types of things are happening, the crime rate of Lakshadweep is already very low. Hence, there is no need to pass such types of furor and draconian laws, people were living in peace and harmony with each other but after the new administration, Patel brought many changes in the entire system which hurts the religious, cultural feelings of the people residing of Lakshadweep. People were demanding Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Ramnath Kovind urgently call back Patel. The Kerala High Court however has declined to stay the implementation of LDAR and all the other three regulations are still with the Home Ministry for scrutinizing purposes, it will be interesting to see how things will go once these regulations will be passed and get the assent of the President.

This article is written by Kiran Israni, 3rd Year Law Student of Baba Saheb Ambedkar College of Law, Nagpur.

LATEST POSTS

ARCHIVES

Job Opportunity: Associate at LCT Law Offices, Bengaluru: Apply Now!

Posted on

LCT Law Offices specializes in advising Indian and international businesses on corporate commercial transactions, general corporate advisory, early stage capital and other start up activities, private equity and venture capital funding, privacy and data protection, intellectual property and employment laws. 

We seek legally trained and qualified lawyers with the following attributes for our Bangalore offices: 

1) 2 to 4 years’ PQE;

2) Bachelors in Law from a good law university in India;

3) General corporate/commercial and PE/VC experience;

4) Commercially minded.

A successful candidate will possess the ability to work independently, draft, review and negotiate corporate commercial and transaction documents; and provide ongoing legal counsel (corporate, regulatory and compliance) to clients. A strong background in the technology sector will be a plus. 

A successful candidate will have excellent time management, interpersonal and organizational skills, enjoy working hard and being continually challenged; and demonstrate sound judgment within the scope of duties.

We provide competitive compensation per industry standards.

Employment Type

Full-time

How to Apply?

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2595609626

Official Notification:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2595609626

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BKRZpHyuzA46mTWlaFqdjq

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Recovery of Possession of Immovable Property under Specific Relief Act

Posted on

Introduction

There are two different concept of term ‘Possession’ 

  Corpus – Actual power and apparent control over the object

  Animus – Will to avail oneself of the Corpus

The Specific Relief Act of 1963 addressed a vast number of legal issues that needed to be addressed. In most cases, substantive law, which outlines rights and responsibilities, provides remedies. The law of contract, for example, provides a remedy for the violation of contract in the form of damages. Although the Specific Relief Act is focused on civil rights rather than criminal laws, even civil law must protect some rights, including those related to property holding. There are two types of property: mobile and immovable.

Let us now understand this with the help of an example .

A is an owner of a house and he gives permission to B for living there for some days, after two years when A asked B to leave the house he disagreed with the same. And also after repeated warning by A, B didn’t leave the house 

Now in this situation under section 5 of specific relief A can recover his house from B, he can file a suit under ownership. 

Possession of transportable property is reclaimed:-

The Specific Relief Act of 1963, Sections 5 and 6, establish methods for regaining custody of certain specific immovable property. A person entitled to ownership of any specific immovable property can recover it in the way stipulated by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, under Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. (5 of 1908). Section 5 explains how to get the specific immovable property back. “A person entitled to possession of the specified immovable property may reclaim it in the manner prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,” it states.

The keyword in this section is ‘title,’ which means that whoever has a better title is entitled to ownership. It’s possible that the title is one of ownership or possession. Thus, even if ‘A’ takes peaceful possession of land claiming it as his own despite having no legal title, he has the right to sue another who has forcibly removed him from possession since, though he may not have a legal title, he does have a possessory title. It is a legal notion that a person who has had long-term continuous possession of immovable property can defend it by requesting an injunction against anyone other than the real owner wherever in the world.

Both Sections 5 and 6 provide alternative remedies, but they are mutually exclusive. A person who has been displaced can reclaim possession under section 5 on the basis of title, whereas a person who has been displaced can reclaim possession under section 6 by demonstrating previous possession and further unjust dispossession. In the meaning of section 6, possession refers to legal possession that can exist with or without physical possession and can be of any rightful origin. In a section 6 lawsuit, the plaintiff is not required to establish title.

Possession of movable goods is reclaimed:-

The Certain Relief Act of 1963, Sections 7 and 8, contains measures for regaining control of specific moveable goods. “A person entitled to the custody of the designated movable property may recover it in the manner authorized by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908,” says Section 7 of the Act (5 of 1908).

Explanation 1: Under this clause, a trustee may claim for possession of the movable property to which he is entitled.

Explanation 2: A temporary or special right to current possession is enough to sustain a claim under this section.”

Section 7 vs. Section 8: What’s the Difference?

A person with a special or temporary right to present possession can bring suit even against the owner under section 7, whereas a decree under section 7 is for the return of movable property or the money value in the alternative, whereas a decree under section 8 is only for the return of a specific article.

Limitation Period:- 

Under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, a suit for possession of immovable property, based on title, can be filed by a person for claiming the title. The statutory limitation period for immovable property is within 12 years. According to Article 65, The limitation commences from the date when the possession of the defendant becomes adverse to the plaintiff. In these circumstances, it is apparent that to contest a suit for possession, filed by a person on the basis of his title, a plea of adverse possession can be taken by a defendant who is in hostile and open possession if a person has remained in possession for a period of 12 years.

Conclusion:-

Because the Indian Contract Act of 1872 only provides relief in the form of compensation in cases of contract breach, the remedies offered by the Specific Relief Act become required. The plaintiff had no remedy for specific performance where the loss was not quantifiable and compensation in the form of relief was insufficient to compensate for the loss. A person entitled to the possession of immovable property or having a particular right to the possession may recover it through the legal process under the requirements of sections 5 and 6. Similarly, sections 7 and 8 give the person the power to reclaim custody of transportable goods.

The article is written by Kiran Israni, 3rd Year Law Student of Baba Saheb Ambedkar College of Law, Nagpur.

LATEST POSTS

ARCHIVES

Job Opportunity: Associate Legal Counsel at RGF Professional Recruitment, Gurugram: Apply Now!

Posted on

Company Overview:

They offers investment solutions and services and retirement expertise to more than 2.5 million customers globally. As a privately-held, purpose-driven company with a 50-year heritage, we think generationally and invest for the long term. Operating in more than 25 locations and with $608.7billion in total assets, our clients range from central banks, sovereign wealth funds, large corporates, financial institutions, insurers and wealth managers, to private individuals.

Job Description:

This is a global role having direct interface with our colleagues located outside India. You will primarily assist on documentation related to

our asset management, retail and pension business and in particular its registered funds, regardless of jurisdiction and

other related matters. This position requires ready access to and regular communication with our colleagues in different geographies, eye for detail, diligence and willingness to learn.

Requirements

  • Ideal candidate must have LLB and/or Company Secretary qualification with 2 – 3 years of experience in-house experience in a multinational company (preferably Financial/IAsset Management Company)
  • Excellent oral and written communication skills; excellent judgment; business sense; high standards of ethics, honesty and integrity
  • Strong attention to detail, organization and ability to successfully manage several ongoing assignments.
  • Must have common sense approach to issues
  • Team player
  • Willingness to learn and use of technology
  • Please note this is not a Co-Sec role – Company Secretary qualification is preferable but not a must.
  • Cross-border /international engagement linked experience is must

Additional Information

  • Drafting prospectus wording and other related documents (including but not limited to Annual Information Forms, Fund Facts, KIIDs etc.)
  • Prepare regulatory correspondences and communication regarding Fund renewals, amendments and new fund launches.
  • Liaising with internal and external stakeholders for preparing fund documentation and filings.
  • Providing legal support to the product team/ other business units on need basis

Seniority Level

Associate

Industry

  • Information Technology & Services 
  • Computer Software 
  • Financial Services

Employment Type

Full-time

Job Functions

  • Legal

How to Apply?

https://www.india.rgf-professional.com/jobs/8107-associate-legal-counsel-gurgaon-gurugram

Official Notification:

https://www.india.rgf-professional.com/jobs/8107-associate-legal-counsel-gurgaon-gurugram

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BKRZpHyuzA46mTWlaFqdjq

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Job Opportunity: Assistant Manager Legal at Blackberrys Menswear, Gurugram: Apply Now!

Posted on

About Blackberrys Menswear

Blackberrys exists in a man’s world to be his partner-in-success, as he sprints towards his ambitions with a burning desire to keep winning. The brand will do all it takes to enable this man to write his success story, while keeping him sharp and always in style. From trousers, suits, jackets and blazers for formal occasions to bringing in khakis, shirts, denims, t-shirts and inner wear, shoes and accessories, Blackberrys has turned out to be a one-stop shop for men’s growing fashion needs.

Under the able leadership of Mohan Brothers, the team at Blackberrys has delivered the highest level of customer excellence. In the 25 years of its journey, the brand has won plethora of accolades and achieved milestones, showcasing that what we do, we do well.

Job Responsibilities:-

1. Providing end to end lifecycle management of contracts.

2. Providing general advisory, formalizing SOPs and policy documents for the organization. Participation in discussion with internal stakeholder’s external councils and advisors during the entire contracting process.

3. Identifying contractual, commercial, operational risks and exposures in the contracts; providing inputs/mark-up on contracts and suggest steps for its mitigation to safeguard company’s interest in various commercial transactions.

4. Ensuring legal compliance with all operation of the company including matters pertaining to Labour Law, State Law, Shop & Establishment, Trade, MSME, Contract Labour etc.

5. Handling Civil/Industrial/Commercial/Criminal/Labour/Land Law matters and filing and defending the cases, appearance before the court and authorities, settlement of challan, drafting legal notice, replies and letters.

6. To be well versed with provisions of Legal Metrology Act & Packaged Commodity Rules and IPR law.

7. Maintain data base for litigations, notices, IPR, Compliance tracker etc. and preparations of MIS Reports on monthly basis.

Seniority Level

Mid-Senior level

Industry

  • Apparel & Fashion 
  • Retail 
  • Hospitality

Employment Type

Full-time

Job Functions

  • Legal

How to Apply?

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2610608273

Official Notification:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2610608273

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BKRZpHyuzA46mTWlaFqdjq

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Job Opportunity: Legal Counsel_RBEI at Bosch Engineering and Business Solutions, Bengaluru: Apply Now!

Posted on

Job Description:

As part of RBEI’s Software & Digital Services Business, the Legal Counsel will be expected to be an experienced, well qualified legal professional with substantial knowledge of the IOT / IT / Software industry and competent to draft and negotiate varied commercial contracts, provide legal advice and expertise to the assigned business units, and understand the legal environment it operates in.

The Legal Counsel Will Be Responsible For The Following

  • Provide expert contractual advice, negotiate and draft a wide range of diverse complex contractual agreements based on varied business models with customers, vendors and partners (Services agreements, Product and Solution Agreements, Software License Agreements, Software Development and License Agreements, Cloud Hosting Agreements, Software Partner Agreement, Teaming Agreements, Reseller and Distribution Agreements, NDA’s, manufacturing and direct procurement Agreements, service, subscription and maintenance agreements, SAAS, PAAS contracts, end user agreements, terms of use, terms for digital business, website terms and conditions, terms and conditions for mobile apps, data protection agreements, etc.,) in alignment with relevant laws and internal Bosch Policies and Directives;
  • Independently handle and correspond with business units for all types of contractual requirements, legal advice, defining business models, sensitizing on legal risks, implications of new laws and process requirements;
  • Work closely with all functional groups, other corporate departments and within the global legal group (including regional and subject matter legal experts) while drafting contracts and providing legal advisory to the assigned business units;
  • Keep abreast of industry-specific regulations and proactively communicate to Business units on laws and regulations that have an impact on the Business units assigned. Specific knowledge of technology and cyber laws, data privacy and protection laws, mobility and automobile laws, consumer and product liability laws and IPR law is required;
  • Create playbooks on all essential legal topics for the assigned business units and provide trainings to the assigned business units to enable business to follow processes for successful execution of their projects/transactions;
  • Create and provide a high quality legal partnership with RBEI’s Business Units by understanding its business, issues, strategies and legal requirements;
  • Ensure that contracts and proposals are properly entered into organizational databases and securely maintained;
  • Participate , contribute and present topics in the Global /Regional Legal IT workshops;
  • Identify and implement best practices and projects for the legal team, including on IT tool requirements, contract management, process improvements, projects having cross-functional impact, etc

Qualifications

Eligibility Criteria:

  • LL.B/LL.M from a premier law school or university in India
  • Have at least 10 to 12 years of relevant in-house legal experience in a leading IT/Tech MNC with a proven track record in providing legal advisory and drafting legal documentation pertaining to commercial technology law areas.
  • Should have worked extensively on International Contracts

Additional Information

The Legal Counsel Needs To Have The Following Skills

  • Have strong analytical, drafting and negotiating skills with an ability to quickly absorb customer requirements, deep dive into project transactions and draft appropriate legal documentation;
  • Must be a Self-starter by exhibiting high motivation, sense of urgency, commitment and ownership;
  • Have the ability to set priorities and comfortably work in an intensely timeline-oriented environment;
  • Have high integrity, collaborative communication and interpersonal skills;
  • Have a Global mindset and experience working with multiple regions and time zones ;
  • Needs to be confident, dynamic and have a pro-active disposition;
  • Possess very good English language skills, spoken and written;
  • Work within an inclusive working environment by being a Team Player;
  • Think “outside of the box” to come up with practical and innovative solutions to legal and business issues
  • Strategic bend of mind, legal-commercial skills, to have a very strong business acumen and connect
  • Be a trusted advisor to leadership team, therefore exposure to leadership team in current role will be an advantage

How to apply?

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2602463001

Official Notification:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2602463001

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BKRZpHyuzA46mTWlaFqdjq

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Case Law Analysis: P. Anand Gajapathi Raju & Ors. v. P.V.G Raju

Posted on

Case Number

Civil Appeal No. 5251 of 1993

Equivalent Citations

(2000) 4 SCC 539

Bench

D.P. Wadhwa, Ruma Pal

Date of Judgment

March 28, 2000

Relevant Act/ Sections

Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Section 2(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Section 8(1) & 8(2) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Section 2(e) of Arbitration Act, 1940

Facts of the Case:

During the pendency of this appeal, all the parties have entered into an arbitration agreement. The arbitration agreement covers all the disputes between the parties in the proceedings before the court and even more than that. They have agreed to refer their disputes in this appeal and others to Justice S. Ranganathan, a retired Judge of this Court as sole Arbitrator. The arbitration agreement is in the form of an application and has been signed by all the parties, The agreement meets the requirements of Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (new Act).

Relevant Legal Provision:

Section 8 of the New Act lays down the conditions which are required to be satisfied for referring a suit to arbitration. The relevant parts of the law are reproduced below: – 

“8(1). A judicial authority before which an action is brought in a matter which is the subject of an arbitration agreement, shall if a party so applies not later than when submitting his first statement on the substance of the dispute, refer the parties to arbitration.

(1) The application referred to in sub-section (1) shall not be entertained unless it is accompanied by the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy thereof.

(2) Notwithstanding that an application has been made under sub-section (1) and that the issue is pending before the judicial authority, and arbitration may be commenced or continued and an arbitral award made.”

Issues before the Court:

  1. Whether this Court in appeal can refer the parties to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  2. Whether the Court is, in circumstances where the entire subject matter of the suit is considered in the arbitration agreement, obliged to refer the parties to arbitration and if so with what effect.

Ratio of the Case

  •  Section 5, which is contained in Part I of the new Act, defines the extent of judicial intervention in arbitration proceedings. It says that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, in matters governed by Part I, no judicial authority shall intervene except where so provided in that Part. 
  • Section 5 brings out clearly the object of the new Act, namely, that of encouraging resolution of disputes expeditiously and less expensively and when there is an arbitration agreement, the Courts intervention should be minimal.
  • The conditions which are required to be satisfied under sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 8 before the Court can exercise its powers are: 
    • (1) there is an arbitration agreement; 
    • (2) a party to the agreement brings an action in the Court against the other party; 
    • (3) subject matter of the action is the same as the subject matter of the arbitration agreement; 
    • (4) the other party moves the Court for referring the parties to arbitration before it submits its first statement on the substance of the dispute.
  • The last provision (4) creates a right in the person bringing the action to have the dispute adjudicated by the Court, once the other party has submitted his first statement of defense. But if the party, who wants the matter to be referred to arbitration applies to the Court after submission of his statement and the party who has brought the action does not object, as is the case before us, there is no bar on the Court referring the parties to the arbitration.
  • In the matter before us, the arbitration agreement covers all the disputes between the parties in the proceedings before us and even more than that.
  • The arbitration agreement satisfies the requirements of Section 7 of the new Act. The language of Section 8 is peremptory. It is, therefore, obligatory for the Court to refer the parties to arbitration in terms of their arbitration agreement.
  • There is no question of stay of the proceedings till the arbitration proceedings conclude and the Award becomes final in terms of the provisions of the new Act.
  • All the rights, obligations, and remedies of the parties would now be governed by the new Act including the right to challenge the Award.
  • An application before a Court under Section 8 merely brings to the Courts notice that the subject matter of the action before it is the subject matter of an arbitration agreement.

Final Decision:

The Court allows the application and would refer the parties to the arbitration. No further orders are required in this appeal and it stands disposed of accordingly.

This case analysis is done by Prateek Chandgothia, a first-year BA LLB (Hons.) students at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab.

LATEST POSTS

ARCHIVES

Case Analysis: Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company v. Secretary of State for India

Posted on

Name of the case

Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company v. Secretary of State for India.

Equivalent Citation

(1861) 5 Bom. H.C.R. App. I,p.1

Bench

Peacock C.J, Jackson J, Wells J

Relevant Section

Section 65 of the Government of India Act, 1858  

Relevant Act

Government of India Act, 1858.

Facts of the Case

In the course of their employment, a servant of the plaintiff Company was travelling from Garden Beach in Calcutta in an exceeding carriage pulled by a pair of horses belonging to the plaintiff and driven by the coachman. While the bus was travelling by Kidderpore Dockyard, which may be a government dockyard overseen by the Superintendent of Marine, certain government employees were riveting a piece of iron funnel casing. It weighed around 300 kilogrammes, was eight or nine feet long, and stood about two feet tall. The lads carrying the cargo walked along the centre of the road. The coachman issued a warning to the youngsters carrying the iron. The lads sought to induce their way out of the way, those ahead trying to go to one side, and those behind attempted to travel to the opposite side. As a result of this, you lost time, which caused the carriage to stop for them, even though they had left the centre of the road.

They were startled by the carriage’s proximity and abruptly dropped the iron and ran. The iron landed with a respectable clap, which roused the aggrieved party’s ponies, who rushed forward savagely and fell on the iron, injuring at least one pony. The action was launched by the injured party Company to recuperate Rs. 350/ – due to the injury, and the lawsuit against the Secretary of State was afterwards brought on the basis that a government worker concluded the irresponsible exhibition.

Issues Before the Court

  • Whether or not the Company’s actions fall inside the purview of the State’s sovereign powers?
  • What was the East India Company’s overall risk for the complicated demonstrations of its personnel submitted in the course of their work?
  • Whether the Secretary of State was liable for the damage caused by the government’s carelessness. servants, supposing they were guilty of such carelessness?

Ratio Decidendi

  • Where a protest is carried out in the exercise of sovereign forces, there will be opposition, and no activity will take place. However, because the East India Company had a twofold restriction and were at once truly trading for their own and were that preoccupied with trades halfway for state requirements and partly for their own, they may be held liable for the unfair demonstration of any of their employees if such conduct occurred during the course of an exchange unrelated to the exercise of sovereign powers.
  • Given the facts of this case, the workers employed by the government at the dockyard were not performing any activity within the scope of sovereign forces, but the demonstration was the culmination of an endeavor that could be carried out by a non-open individual without having sovereign forces assigned to him, to which the archipelago Company would be obligated. As a result, the Secretary of State for India was also to blame for the reckless demonstrations of its personnel.
  • Mishaps like these, when caused by the negligence of government employees, the Malay Archipelago Company, would be susceptible, and a similar risk is attached to the Secretary of State.

Judgment

The plaintiffs contend that the Secretary of State was given the benefit of the doubt. Furthermore, the East India Company was not the sovereign, although having some royal powers granted to them, and hence could not claim immunity in every instance.

This article is written by Mudit Jain, pursuing B.B.A.LL.B.(H) from the Indore Institute of Law.

LATEST POSTS

ARCHIVES

Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law

Posted on

What is International Law? 

We can define international laws in many possible ways such as: –

• OPPENHEIM defines international law as “the body of customary and conventional rules that are considered legally binding by polite states in their relationships with one another, within a society, and which shall be enforced by external power by mutual consent of the community.”

• J.G. Starke described international law as “that body of law constituted for most of the principles and rules of conduct which governments feel compelled to observe, and hence do generally observe in their relations with one another.”

• “The legal system governing the communication between nations; more modern, the Law of International Affairs, embracing not only nations but also such actors as International organizations and individuals,” according to Black’s Law Dictionary.

Thus, International Law is a body of rules and principles which regulate the conduct and relations of the members of the international community

What is Municipal Law?

•Municipal Law is the state domestic or domestic law of a sovereign state defined in opposition to international law.

•Municipal law involves many stages of law, not only state law but also local, territorial, regional, or local law.

•Municipal law is the law specific to a specific city or country and the government bodies within those cities or countries.

Thus, Municipal Law is the acts made by the legislature or the Legislative authority of a state, applicable to that state alone.

Difference between Municipal and International Law?

International Law is largely but not altogether concerned with the relation among states. Whereas Municipal Law controls relations between people within a state and between individuals and the state. International Law, on the other hand, controls relations between the member States of the Family of Nations. Municipal Law controls relations between the individuals under the influence of the respective State and the relations between this State and the respective individuals. Law of Nations is a Law not above, but between the Sovereign States. Whereas Municipal Law is a Law of a Sovereign over individuals exposed to his way.  

Relationship Between International and Municipal Law 

Theories

1. Monism

2. Dualism

3. Specific Adoption Theory

4.Transformation Theory

5.Delegation Theory

Dualism

This idea, known as dualism, emphasizes that the laws of international and local law systems exist independently and cannot be said to affect or govern one another. According to this theory, international and domestic law are two distinct bodies of law that operate independently of one another. Under dualism, international law norms and principles cannot directly impact individual rights and duties; instead, they must be transformed or incorporated into domestic law before they can affect individual rights and obligations. International law and municipal law exist, according to dualist theory, but their functioning is vastly different. International law cannot interfere with municipal laws, according to the dualist perspective, if international law rules are not incorporated into municipal laws. The transformation concept is an important aspect of the dualist approach, which states that if international law is turned into national law, municipal law takes precedence. The adoption doctrine is a broader thesis of the dualist approach, according to which international law cannot impose rights on municipal laws unless the rules are acknowledged as inclusive in domestic laws, resulting in an obligation to observe such international rules.

Monism

The monist stance is an outgrowth of Kantian philosophy, which advocates for a unitary view according to this viewpoint because states’ capacities are derived from the concept of law, the law grants them the authority to exercise such capacities. As a result, the law to which jurisdictional reference must be made is separate from sovereignty and determines its boundaries. When a state crosses the line, its actions are null and void. This argument is reasonable since it results in international law having a considerably broader and more fundamental jurisdiction than municipal law. However, it tends to ignore the dualist’s point, namely, that a municipal court may be instructed to apply municipal law rather than international law, and thus has no jurisdiction (using the term as a descriptive term for the capacity to decide a case in municipal law) to declare the relevant municipal law invalid.  

As a result, describing the jurisdictional excess as “invalid” or even “illegal” (if there is any distinction between the terms) has no intrinsic meaning inside the acting State’s municipal law. To this point, the monist has just one response: that this conflict of tasks was improperly resolved due to a flaw in the organization.

Delegation Theory

This theory says that the rules of international law identified as “Constitutional rules of international/treaties” delegate a right to each state constitution, allowing each state to

 decide or determine for itself how and when the provisions of an international treaty or convention are to come into force, and in what manner they are to be implemented or embodied into the State of Law

COUNTRIES

U. S.

Apart from the requirement to consider the Constitution, the American view on the link between municipal law and customary international law appears to be very similar to British practice. As a general concept, it is, of course correct that the United States has a fundamental national interest in complying with international law,’ the US Supreme Court stated in Boos v. Barry. The Constitution, on the other hand, applied to international law. As in the United State, an early endorsement of the incorporation doctrine was eventually amended. International law is part of our law, according to the Paquet Habana case, and it must be established and administered by courts of appropriate authority as often as problems of right relying on it are duly filed for judgment. The current consensus is that customary international law in the United States is federal law and that the federal courts’ decisions are binding on state courts. The doctrine of precedent and the requirement to act following previously decided cases bind US courts, and they, too, must apply the statute against any norms of customary international law that conflict with it. In the Commission of United States Citizens Living in Nicaragua v. Reagan case, the Court of Appeals reiterated that an act of Congress might be challenged because it breaches customary international law. It has been emphasized that the US legislative and judicial branches have the authority to disregard international law when doing so is authorized by a statute or a “controlling executive act.” This, like the wider relationship between custom and conflicting pre-existing statutes, has sparked a lot of debate. However, it is now widely understood that statutes replace older treaties or international law customary principles.

China

Despite the growing interest in Chinese studies in the United States, little, if any, emphasis has been dedicated to the study of Communist China’s international law perspective. Some may believe that, as a socialist country, Communist China cannot do anything except follow the Soviet understanding of international law or that of socialist countries in general. This viewpoint may contain some truth, but it does not reveal the entire picture. Communist China accepts many of the principles of international law promulgated or applied by the Soviet Union or Soviet jurists but given the growing divergences in viewpoints between the two countries in dealing with many international issues and conducting the international Communist movement, it is reasonable to conclude that Communist China and the Soviet Union have developed differing perspectives on international law. In this regard, Wu T6Feng, a prominent Communist Chinese jurist and President of the China Political Science and Law Association, recently published a study in which he harshly condemned the Soviet understanding of international law.

India

Articles 51, 73, 245& 246 of the Indian Constitution have dealt with “international laws” and “treaties,” but clause “c” of Article 51 specifically mentions “International law” and “treaty obligation,” but art. 51 does not provide any clear guidance regarding the position of international laws in India or the relationship between municipal laws and international law, but Prof. C.H. If international law does not clash with any legislative action, it is incorporated into municipal laws in India. The enactment or provision of the constitution. Indian courts can use international law if it is not in contradiction with domestic law. The Indian constitution’s “dualistic” doctrine allows foreign laws to be incorporated into local law. International treaties are not immediately incorporated into Indian law. To be incorporated into the legal system, an act of parliament must be passed. The court will first look at local legislation, and if the municipal legislation is silent on an issue, the court will turn to Customary International for help; the SC has done this before, and the court did the same thing in the case of Jolly George Varghese and an. V. The Bank OF Cochin.

U. K. 

The United Kingdom’s public policy is that courts should, in general, give regard to recognised international law standards. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain why international law laws are applicable within the jurisdiction. The doctrine of transformation is one manifestation of the positivist dualist perspective. This is based on the 9 perceptions of two distinct systems of law that operate independently, and maintains that before any rule or principle of international law can have any effect within the domestic jurisdiction, it must be expressly and specifically “transformed” into municipal law using the appropriate constitutional machinery, such as the Constitutional Court as an act of Parliament, Another viewpoint, known as the doctrine of incorporation, says that foreign law instantly becomes part of municipal law without the need for a constitutional ratification mechanism. The most famous proponent of this theory is the eighteenth-century lawyer Blackstone, who wrote in his Commentaries that “the law of nations, wherever any question arises which is properly the subject of its jurisdiction, is here adopted in its full extent by the common law, and it is held to be a part of the law of the land.”

Conclusion

To explore the relationship between domestic and international law, there are primarily two   theories: monistic and dualistic. Monistic theory is based on natural law, which claims that    both domestic and international law are the same law, with no need for division. However, according to the dualistic approach, which is founded on positive law, domestic and international law are distinct entities. Unless the nation-state agrees to do so, it is not required to observe international law. Even though both theories have a position in international law, just a few countries in the world adhere to pure dualism or monism. When it is in their interests, countries follow international law favour and do not follow when it is not. This is what we can see in the international situation.

This article is written by Shrey Hasija  student at Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, GGSIPU.

LATEST POSTS

ARCHIVES

Job Opportunity: Associate at Vaish Associates Advocate: Apply Now!

Posted on

New Delhi office is on the lookout for Lawyers with 2/3 years PQE in Corporate matters with a reputed law firm. The incumbents would be expected to be team players from a good law school having a good academic record with good drafting and oral communication skills.

Designation: Associate
Team: General Corporate

Education and Experience:

1 – Essential Requirement: Law graduate from a premier Law School.
2 – Non-essential Requirement: A qualified Company Secretary from the Institute of Company Secretaries of India is desirable, but not a pre-requisite.
3 – Experience: Should have PQE of 2 to 3 years with a reputed corporate law firm.

Essential Functions and Responsibilities:

1 – Drafting opinions on legal matters, including under SEBI and Corporate Laws, Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, labour laws etc.;
2 – Conducting legal due diligence and preparation of relevant reports;
3 – Drafting and vetting of agreements which inter alia include, share purchase agreements, share subscription agreements, shareholders agreements, business transfer agreements, asset purchase agreements, joint venture agreement, employment contracts, consultants contracts, distributorship agreements, NDA etc.;
4 – Attending negotiation meetings/conferences with seniors and revising the agreements based on the discussion;
5 – Conducting comprehensive legal research and analysis;
6 – General legal/transactional advisory;
7 – Liaison with governmental/ regulatory authorities/ ministries etc.

Desirous candidates may e-mail their applications to hr@vaishlaw.com (with a subject line: Corporate/Associate/Delhi.

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BKRZpHyuzA46mTWlaFqdjq

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/