The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) on Thursday notified the rules for protection of Good Samaritans. A Good Samaritan is a person, who in good faith, voluntarily and without expectation of any award or compensation renders emergency medical or non-medical care or assistance at the scene of an accident to the victim or transports such victim to the hospital.

The rules provide that no officer or any other person shall compel a Good Samaritan to disclose his/her name, identity, address or any such other personal details. However, he may voluntarily choose to disclose the same and if that person has voluntarily agreed to become a witness in the case in which he has acted as a Good Samaritan, he shall be examined in accordance with the provisions of these rules. The rules also provide that the Good Samaritan be treated respectfully without any discrimination on the grounds of religion, nationality, caste or sex. Every public and private hospital shall publish a charter in Hindi, English and vernacular language, at the entrance or other conspicuous location, and on their website, stating the rights of Good Samaritans.

The Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019, inserted a new section 134A, named “Protection of Good Samaritan” which provides that a Good Samaritan shall not be liable for any civil or criminal action for any injury to or death of the victim of an accident.  India witnesses around 1.5 lakh deaths due to road accidents in a year, which is highest in the world, and that’s why government has been taking several steps to reduce these tragedies. And this is the reason the government put out the rules so that people who come forward to help the road accidents victims on the spot could be prevented from any legal mess at the hospital or later by law enforcement authorities and hence these rules are to encourage the public to come forward to help accident victims so that they get shifted to a nearby hospital immediately

About Law Primis

Law Primis is an online platform launched in 2020. They seek to spread awareness among individuals from legal backgrounds and individuals interested in the legal field.

They aim to reach people and increase their understanding of the multifaceted life that is the career and practice of the law. They seek to be the platform that caters to your needs as an individual interested in this field.

About serving on the Law Primis Editorial Board

Board membership provides an opportunity to discuss issues of importance in education, develop collaborative relationships with scholars and colleagues, and gain editorial skills and scholarly publishing experience. These positions offer an opportunity to engage with a range of writing and research on law, policy and social sciences.

Minimum Requirements

  • The applicant must be in or above 3rd year (5-year course) or 2nd year (3-year course) of Law College or in Masters or Research Scholar in Law.
  • The applicant must have strong research and analysis skills.
  • The applicant must possess strong command over the English language.
  • The applicant must have at least one publication with a peer-reviewed journal or at least two paper presentations at national conferences.

Number of Vacancies

4 (four)

Important Note

  • An awareness of current affairs and contemporary debates in law will be valuable.
  • Familiarity with web applications and publications would be welcome.
  • Preference will be given to candidates having prior editorial experience or research experience. However, the same is not a pre-requisite to apply.
  • Kindly specifically mention any special qualifications held with respect to any of the above-mentioned requirements.

Roles and Responsibility

  • Making primary decisions on the merit of a written piece.
  • Send conditional acceptance and written feedback for improving an article.
  • Language and content editing of the articles, commentaries, case comments and book reviews.
  • Other miscellaneous editorial tasks.

Application Procedure

FILL THIS FORM.

  • Candidates selected after the initial scrutiny will be sent a manuscript to review of which they have to submit a review report.
  • Candidates will be shortlisted on the basis of the quality of the review report and will subsequently be interviewed.
  • Details of the same will be communicated to the prospective persons soon; kindly refrain from repeatedly following up on the status of your application or interview result.

Contact Information

For any other query contact us at 

connect@lawprimis.com.

CLICK HERE FOR THE WEBSITE.

About DSNLU

Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University is a National Law University located at Sabbavaram, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India constituted by the DSNLU Act, 2008.


About Legal Incubation Centre (DSLIC)

DSLIC is the Legal Incubation Centre inaugurated by DSNLU in 2018 with the aim of developing entrepreneurship and advocacy skills among young lawyers and students.


About the Workshop

DSLIC is conducting a One-Day Online Workshop on Law of Evidence, October 10, 2020.

Topic

Law of Evidence: Challenges in Practice and Procedure


Platform CISCO Webex


Speakers

Hon’ble Mr Justice N. Kumar (Retd.) High Court of Karnataka
Hon’ble Mr Shri Avadhanam Hari Haranadha Sarma Principal District Judge Vishakhapatnam, A.P
Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy State Public Prosecutor
High of A.P
Shri Anup Koushik Karavadi Advocate, Karavadi Associates
A.P and Telangana


Important Dates and Time

Event Date: October 10, 2020
Time of the Event: 10 AM – 5 PM
Last Date for Registration: October 8, 2020
Contact Persons
 Rohan Gupta: 07013842602
 B. Rachna Gupta: 07981101373

ABOUT LAWSCHOLE

Lawschole is an e-learning platform which offers online self-paced Certificate Courses for law students and professionals! Our Courses are designed in a way that will not only help students learn law but will also help them acquire practical legal skills. Our students include UG/PG law
students, lawyers and advocates!


ABOUT THE CERTIFICATE COURSE ON OFFENCES AGAINST HUMAN BODY UNDER IPC


The Certificate course on Offences against Human Body consists of three (3) Modules, which shall be made accessible to the enrolled students from the “My Courses” section from October 11 to November 10. The students must submit the “Assignment” be eligible for the issuance of the
Certificate.

COURSE STRUCTURE: WEEK 1 MODULE-I: Offences against the Human Body (PART I)
a. Culpable Homicide and Murder
b. Rash and Negligent Act
c. Dowry Death
d. Attempt to Murder
e. Attempt and Abetment to Suicide

WEEK 2 MODULE-II: Offences against Human Body (PART II)
a. Hurt and Grievous Hurt
b. Criminal Force and Assault
c. Wrongful Restraint and Wrongful Confinement
d. Kidnapping and Abductions

WEEK 3 MODULE-III: Offences against Women

a. Outraging the Modesty of Women, Voyeurism, Stalking, Acid Attack
b. Rape and Unnatural Offences
c. Cruelty and Offences relating to Marriage

WEEK 4
Submit your Assignment- CERTIFICATE WILL ONLY BE ISSUED ONCE YOU SUBMIT THE ASSIGNMENT

REGISTRATION FEES-COURSE FEE- RS. 799/-

You can submit the Registration fee via PayTm UPI Money Transfer, Bhim UPI, or Gpay by using the following

UPI ID OR SCANNING THE QR CODE GIVEN ON OUR WEBSITE

https://www.lawschole.com/offences-against-human-body-under-i(PLEASE NOTE: We DO NOT accept payments in Paytm Wallet. Make sure the transfer is a UPI MONEYTRANSFER.)

UPI ID- aprajitabhardwaj18@okicici
or,
PAYTM UPI ID- 7461015926@paytm

ENROLL HERE- FROM OUR WEBSITE- www.lawschole.com

OR, FROM THE GOOGLE FORM-

https://forms.gle/TfRrsRKUT4yRx4Ku5

IMPORTANT DATES:

LAST DATE OF REGISTRATION– OCTOBER 10, 2020
BATCH STARTS– OCTOBER 11, 2020
MODULES ACCESSIBLE FROM– OCTOBER 11, 2020
ASSIGNMENT DUE DATE- NOVEMBER 10, 2020
ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE– NOVEMBER 15, 2020

VISIT OUR WEBSITE

https://www.lawschole.com/

CONTACT US

Contact us at lawschole@gmail.com

About Path Lexis


Path Lexis is a Youth Organization Specializing in Organizing Moot Courts, Debates, Seminars and Other Legal Competitions for a much better learning experience than What is Offered to The Law Students. Driven by a sense of Excellence and Talent in the young minds, a Variety of mediums are provided to help Students Achieve perfectionism in every
the domain of the Legal Field. The Vision at Path Lexis is based around equality of opportunity in the field of Law. By creating a Community of Law Students, all Students are delivered an equal shot at growing
and learning. Every person is a manifestation of their past experiences, upbringing and the socioeconomic backgrounds and Path Lexis transcends such barriers.


About Legal Fumes

Legal Fumes is a team of budding Lawyers that created this platform to gather legal luminaries all around the country under one roof to discuss and analyse the happenings of the world. Through this platform, we strive to provide information to all in the simplest form of language. Legal Fumes is focused on bringing upon the opportunities close to students and the legal academicians. Legal Fumes is one such platform which saw huge growth in a short span of time and is inclined towards the benefits of the students and the legal Academicians.

About Virtual Workshop

This virtual workshop is organized to facilitate the students of legal education across the nation to develop their skill. In the modern era, most of the law graduates are moving towards the corporate field and vacillate to enter the legal clan due to the absence of advocacy skill. we planned to conduct a two-day virtual workshop on the art of advocacy.
This virtual workshop will provide the basic structure of advocacy, presentation, communication, personality development and drafting skills.
The eminent speakers of the virtual workshop include Advocates of Supreme Court of India and High Court of Rajasthan who will impart their valuable knowledge on the theme of the workshop.
The main objective of this virtual workshop is to inculcate to the law students about the various tinge of advocacy.


Details of the Programme
Topic Name: Art of Advocacy- Changing Dimensions in the Contemporary Era

Topic Cover 
TrialAdvocacy
AppellateAdvocacy
professional ethics
Cross-Examination and Examination In Chief
The Art of Defending, Convincing 
Negotiation Skills and much more.


About Speaker

Mr Mudit Singhvi (Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur):- Trial and
Appellate Advocacy  on 10 October 2020 ( 4 PM  – 6 PM) 

Mr Aditya Singh (AOR Supreme Court of India):-  Cross
Examination and Examination in Chief On 11 October 2020 ( 11 AM – 1 PM)

Mr Vikas Kabra (Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur) :-  Art of
Defending, Convincing and Negotiation Skills  on 11 October 2020 ( 4 PM – 6 PM) 


Payment Details and Registration Fee:-
Registration Fee:- 150/-
9078473139 (Paytm, Google pay, Phone Pay)
For NEFT/RTGS Drop a WhatsApp Message at 9078473139

Registration Link :-

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeiT1zoysnbFMeEhOfJR79pm6_tcFOhVUJa88ozmp4QRMcQcQ/viewform

Contact :– 7688879430, 9078473139

About MediateGuru

MediateGuru is a social initiative led by members across the globe. The aim of the organization is to bridge the gap between the general public and litigation. Here our organisation comes into the picture. We are creating a social awareness campaign for showcasing mediation as a future of alternative dispute resolution to provide ease to the judiciary as well as to the pockets of general litigants.

About event

This presentation will look at different types of dispute resolution clauses, why they are important to increase the use of mediation in some jurisdictions and some recent case law on the enforceability of mediation clauses

About the Speaker


Ms. Rachael Bicknell
• Scottish lawyer, CEDR and Harvard-trained negotiator and practising mediator.

• Certified online mediator and ADR ORD International accredited online mediator. 
• Mediates and negotiates a wide range of commercial and civil disputes. 
• Founder of Squaring Circles, a specialist dispute resolution business based in Edinburgh, Scotland, and winner of the NMA Mediation Newcomer of the Year 2020 Award.

• Specialist Mediator panel member of the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association.

• Formerly a dispute resolution solicitor in commercial law firms for 12 years.

• Mediator Member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.

• Accredited Specialist in Professional Negligence Law from the Law Society of Scotland.

• Regular contributor of articles and trainer on negotiation, mediation and online dispute resolution.

Registration Link

https://bit.ly/3idyk6O

Note: E-Certificate will be provided to participants who will fill the attendance form at the end of the session. 

 Date and Timings 

The Webinar will be conducted on 9th October, 2020.

05:00 PM Indian Standard Time

12.30 PM British Summer Time

Registration Fees: 

Kindly note there is no registration fee for the webinar.

Contact info:

For any query mail :

admin@mediateguru.com

Event Coordinator:

Ms. Garima Rana

+91 8800 474 226

This article has been written by Nikhat Suhail. Picture credits to indianlink.com.au

Introduction

Sushant Singh Rajput was an Indian actor who was best known for his work in Hindi cinema (renowned as Bollywood). He was born in the year 1986 and died on 14th June 2020. The post-mortem report stated that the cause of death was “asphyxia due to hanging,” and called it a “clear case of suicide.” The 34-year-old Actor was a renowned Bollywood star and had quite a fandom with his extraordinary acting skills. It was acclaimed that the self-made actor was not a product of Nepotism from the B-town and was thus always left alone. After the actor committed suicide without leaving a note behind it was alleged that depression took the best of him and the long-faced difficulty of being a misfit in the industry even after having great talent was too heavy to hold anymore. Amidst all this, since the actor was an infamous celebrity, media and social media followed every inch of his last rites until the body was cremated, due to which there was a public outrage as the lacunae in the procedures were quite visible and people started speculating if it really was murder. A lot of fingers were raised until on the 25th of July, Rajput’s family lodged a first information report with police in Patna, where his father lives, accusing Rhea Chakraborty(Sushant’s Girlfriend) and five others of abetment of suicide. Campaigns started running under the hashtag of CBI for SSR  throughout the social media after, the police showed a lack of interest in the procedure and people became outrageous on the matter due to which, On 19 August 2020, the Supreme Court of India allowed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Indian national government’s top investigating agency, to take control of the investigation and ordered the CBI to look into any future cases registered in relation to Rajput’s death.  Acting on information provided by the Enforcement Directorate on WhatsApp chats allegedly related to “banned drugs”, The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) on 27th August filed a criminal case against actor Rhea Chakraborty and three of her acquaintances under several sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, claiming proof about the consumption of banned substances.

NDPS Act

The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1985 provides provisions that help in making stringent provisions for the control and regulation of operations relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. The Narcotics Control Bureau also known as NCB was made responsible for administering The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 which Is affiliated to the Home Ministry directly.

Registered Offences and its definitions

SECTION 20 (b) 2

Punishment for contravention in relation to cannabis plant and cannabis:

Whoever—

  1. cultivates any cannabis plant or
  2. produces, manufactures, possesses, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter-State or uses cannabis,

shall be punishable

  1. where such contravention relates to clause (a) with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine which may extend to one lakh rupees; and
  2. where such contravention relates to sub-clause (b),—

(A) and involves small quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to [one year], or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees, or with both;

(B) and involves quantity lesser than commercial quantity but greater than small quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees;

(C) and involves commercial quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to twenty years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to two lakh rupees.

SECTION 22

Punishment for contravention in relation to psychotropic substances:

Whoever, in contravention of any provision of this Act or any rule or order made or condition of the license granted thereunder, manufactures, possesses, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter-State

or uses any psychotropic substance shall be punishable,—

(a) where the contravention involves small quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to [one year], or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees, or with both;

(b) where the contravention involves quantity lesser than commercial quantity but greater than small quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees;

(c) where the contravention involves commercial quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to twenty years, and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to two lakh rupees:

SECTION 27A

Punishment for financing illicit traffic and harboring offenders:

Whoever indulges in the financing, directly or indirectly, any, of the activities specified in sub-clauses (i) to (v) of clause (viiia) of section 2 or harbours any person engaged in any of the aforementioned activities, shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to twenty years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to two lakh rupees

SECTION 28

Punishment for attempts to commit offenses:

Whoever attempts to commit any offense punishable under this Chapter or to cause such offense to be committed and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the offense shall be punishable with the punishment provided for the offense.

SECTION 29

Punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy:

(1) Whoever abets, or is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit, an offense punishable under this Chapter, shall, whether such offense be or be not committed in consequence of such abetment or in pursuance of such criminal conspiracy, and notwithstanding anything contained in section 116 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), be punishable with the punishment provided for the offense.

(2) A person abets, or is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit, an offense, within the meaning of this section, who, in India, abets or is a party to the criminal conspiracy to the commission of any act in a place without and beyond India which—

(a) would constitute an offense if committed within India; or

(b) under the laws of such place, is an offense relating to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances having all the legal conditions required to constitute it such an offense the same as or analogous to the legal conditions required to constitute it an offense punishable under this Chapter, if committed within India.

SECTION 30:

Preparation:

If any person makes preparation to do or omits to do anything which constitutes an offence punishable under any of the provisions of [sections 19, 24 and 27A and for offences involving commercial quantity of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance and from the circumstances of the case] it may be reasonably inferred that he was determined to carry out his intention to commit the offence  it may be reasonably inferred that he was determined to carry out his intention to commit the offence but had been prevented by circumstances independent of his will, he shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one-half of the minimum term (if any), but which may extend to one-half of the maximum term, of imprisonment with which he would have been punishable in the event of his having committed such offence, and also with fine which shall not be less than one-half of the minimum amount (if any), of fine with which he would have been punishable, but which may extend to one-half of the maximum amount of fine with which he would have ordinarily (that is to say in the absence of special reasons) been punishable, in the event aforesaid

The Bail pleas of the accused have been rejected as the provisions of bail for the NDPS Act have been made more stringent considering the kind of offenses that are destroying the structure of the society. The federal drug agency told the Bombay High Court that the case concerns the entire society and is a non-bailable offense.

Role of NCB in the Instant case and Conclusion

The footing of the case here concocted for the NCB when based on his father’s complaint alleging abetment of suicide, cheating, and criminal conspiracy, the Patna Police later registered an FIR against Bollywood actor Rhea Chakraborty. He alleged that ₹15 crores were transferred from Sushant’s account within a short period of time. Subsequently, the ED also instituted a money-laundering case. During the investigation, ED found some electronic evidence through Rhea and her Brothers WhatsApp Chats regarding illegal drugs and other contraband substances. It was then the NCB was involved when the ED provided the chats to the NCB department and asked for further investigation.

The NCB is currently looking into this matter and has made several arrests under the NDPS act of 1985. Several high-profile actors, including Deepika Padukone, Shraddha Kapoor, and Sara Ali Khan, have also been questioned in the drugs case. The NCB is still doing the investigation and has made a statement clearing that elucidates the agenda of digging deep until answers are found.

Latest Posts


This article has been written by Yash Mittal. Picture credits to damajority.com

What is National Security?

National security is the concept of a government, with its parliament that should protect the state and its citizens against all kinds of national threats and crises. It is mainly for protection against military attack but now national security also includes other dimensions, which include the security from terrorism, environmental security, cybersecurity, economic security, etc.

The concept of national security is mostly developed in the United States after World War II. It’s initial focus it’s on military attack, but now it covers the broad range, which impinge on the non-military and economic security of the nation.

In order to possess national security, nation needs to possess economic security, environmental security, energy security etc. Security threats involve not only conventional foes such as other nation-states but also non-state actors such as violent non-state actors, narcotic cartels, multinational co-operations, and Non-governmental organizations (NGO’s), and also includes natural disasters and events causing environmental damage.

Harold Lasswell described national security as freedom from foreign dictation. And Walter Lippman described national security as a nation that has security when it does not have to sacrifice it’s legitimate interests to avoid war and is able if challenged to maintain them by war.

Issues Related to National Security

Military forces place a huge burden on economic security because of its high maintaining cost. Government expenditure on state armed forces was 4% in 2015 in Germany, 14% in the USA, 9% in the chile, 15% in Israel, 19% in Pakistan.

India’s military spending grew by 6.8 percent to $71.1 billion in 2019 according to the SIPRO report and trends in world military expenditure 2019. This is the highest military spending in South Asia.

And India is now the third biggest military spending in the world. If not done so, economic constraints can limit the capabilities of the military.

Unilateral actions related to security by the states can also impact the political security at the international level if it erodes the rule of law and undermining the authority of international institutions.

In competition with other nation-states for the betterment of economic security can impact ecological security.

National Security Advisor

The national security advisor is the senior official of the national security Council (NSC) of India and the chief advisor to the prime minister of India on national and international security policy.

Ajit Doval is the current NSA who is now one of the most powerful bureaucrats in India.

National Security Council (NSC)

The national security Council of India is an executive government agency tasked with advising the prime minister’s office on a matter of national security and strategic interest. It was established by the former prime minister of India Atal Bihari Vajpayee on 19 November 1998, with Brajesh Mishra as the first National Security Advisor. Prior to the formation of the NSC, these activities were overseen by the Principal Secretary to the preceding Prime Minister.

National Security Laws in India

India’s security laws were not restricted to three or four laws, it has a series of laws which had the objective of national security and to safeguard the national interest. But the majority of these laws are Unchecked and have unregulated powers that negatively impact the rights of the citizens. These laws were also called as exception laws or a necessary evil.

Soon after the independence, the Constitution was drafted for securing the rights and protecting the citizens. But there was one law in making which abolishes the rights of the citizens.

1) Preventive detention Act 1950 – Before independence Britishers were using statures of preventive detention for establishing their control. But after independence, India suffering from many problems like communal violence which creates an internal disturbance. For securing the territory, the Constitution, and securing the rights of people preventive detention act was established. In Parliament, PDA was introduced by Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel and he said that he spent many sleepless nights thinking about this bill.

The preventive detention act is a law which authorities the government to detain any individual without any charge for a period of one year.

The objective is to control the communal violence at that time, but it is a temporary law that has a sunset clause and it expires in 1969.

2) Maintenance of internal security act 1971-1977 – Just after the expiry of PDA in 1969, the new act was passed MISA (1971). The majority powers of the preventive detention act were included in the MISA. The objective of this act is to impose restrictions on the persons who were detained. In 1975, the imposition of emergency many people were detained without having trail rights or safeguards.

Any person who comes in opposition with the government were detained under this act. In 1977 this act was abolished.

3) Armed forces special powers act (1958)

In 1957- 1958 there was a Separatist movement in Nagaland which causes the violence and the situation was out of control on the hands of the state to stop the violence in North-eastern states, ASPA was introduced in which armed forces were deployed in disturbed areas to maintain the public order.

Section 3 of ASPA gives powers to the government to declare any part of the country as a disturbed area. And gives powers to the armed forces to use their powers in disturbed areas.

4) National Security Act 1980 – It is the reflection of PDA and MISA. In recent times in the period of lockdown four people got arrested under the NSA charges because they were throwing stones on to the health workers. As in PDA, it gives the power to detain or contain in order to prevent future crimes.

In NSA it gives powers to the central and state government to arrest any person in order to establish national security or national interest. The maximum period of confinement in the NSA is 12 months.

In NSA, if anyone is detained he or she  is denied of his or her basic rights like right to be informed and legal aid.

5) Terrorist and disruptive activities act (1985-1995) – To control separatist activities and especially terrorist activities in Punjab. It overrides the provisions of the criminal procedure code and the Constitution.

* Many new criminal offenses were made.

* Increment in the powers of police officers.

* Reduced the safeguards of the arrested person.

If anyone gives confession in front of the police it was considered Admissible in the court. Due to this, the cases of abuse and torture have been raised.

So after this, the sunset clause of this act has been used and in 1995 this act has lapsed.

6) Prevention of terrorism act 2001 – In this act, any suspect can be detained for six months. The objective of this act is the same as of TADA. And the problems which were in the TADA were also present in this act like excessive powers of police, evidence admissible, etc.

Allegation on the POTA is that political parties fulfilling their vendetta misusing the power of POTA. So using the sunset clause of this act POTA was lapsed.

7) National investigation agency act (2008 & 2019 amendment) – After the Mumbai terror attack, the NIA bill was passed in 2008 for creating a central agency to look into the matter of terror attack in the country. This agency was created to look into the matters which disturbed the sovereignty, integrity, and security of the state and also against atomic and nuclear facilities.

The recent amendment included some effects into the act:-

Human trafficking, offenses related to counterfeit currency or banknotes, manufacturing and sale of Prohibited arms, cyber terrorism, and offenses under the explosive substance act 1908.

8) Unlawful Activities and prevention act (1967) – Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act is an Indian law aimed at effective prevention of unlawful activities associations in India. Its main objective was to make powers available for dealing with activities directed against the integrity and sovereignty of India.

Latest Amendment for 2019: The Act altered Sec 35, 36, and provided power to the government to declare the individual as a terrorist under Schedule IV of the Act. It also provided power to DG of NIA for the seizure of property in sec 25 and investigation by the rank of an inspector under sec 43.

Conclusion

Many acts and laws were passed earlier to tackle the problems of that time. But after this many acts were lapsed by the sunset clause because they were irrelevant and now endangers or threatens the rights of the citizens. If issues such as these were not managed effectively, national security policies and actions may become ineffective and counterproductive.

Latest Posts


This case analysis has been written by Shubham Khandelwal am currently pursuing BBA.LLB from FIMT, IP University. Picture credits to snih.org

CITATION:

AIR 2014 SC 1863

COURT:

Supreme Court of India

JUDGES:

K S Radhakrishnan and AK Sikri

Introduction

Public Legal Services Authority v. Association of India is a milestone choice by the Supreme Court of India, which proclaimed transsexuals the ‘third sex’, avowed that the central rights allowed under the Constitution of India will be similarly pertinent to them, and gave them the privilege to self-ID of their sex as male, female or third sexual orientation. This judgment has been recognized as a significant advance towards sexual orientation correspondence in India. Moreover, the court likewise held that since transsexuals were treated as socially and monetarily in reverse classes, they will be allowed reservations in admissions to instructive establishments and occupations.

Facts

This case was recorded by the national legal services authority of India (nalsa) to legitimately perceive people who fall outside the male/female sexual orientation parallel, including people who distinguish as “third sex”.

Parties

The National Legal Services Authority of India (NALSA) was an essential solicitor. It had been established with the essential goal of giving free lawful guide administrations to the impeded areas of Indian society. Different solicitors in the issue were the Poojya Mata Nasib Kaur Ji Women Welfare Society, an enlisted society and NGO, and Laxmi Narayan Tripathy, a prestigious Hijra dissident.

Bench

The case was heard under the watchful eye of a two-judge seat of the supreme court, made out of justice K.S Panicker Radhakrishnan and justice Arjan Kumar Sikri. Justice Radhakrishnan had worked as a standing counsel for various instructive and social associations and held arrangements in the high courts of Kerala, Jammu and Kashmir, and Gujarat before his rise to the supreme court. Justice Sikri started legitimate practice in Delhi, having some expertise in constitutional cases, labor and service matters, and arbitration matters. Preceding his height to the supreme court, he held arrangements in the Delhi high court and Punjab and Haryana high court.

Issues and Decision

The court needed to choose whether people who fall outside the male/female sexual orientation twofold can be lawfully perceived as “third sex” people. It pondered on in the case of ignoring non-paired sexual orientation personalities is a penetrate of essential rights ensured by the constitution of India. It alluded to a “specialist committee on issues relating to transgender” comprised under the ministry of social justice and empowerment to build up its judgment. This was a milestone choice where the pinnacle court lawfully perceived “third sexual orientation”/transsexual people unexpectedly and talked about “sex personality” finally. The court perceived that third sexual orientation people were qualified for central rights under the constitution and under international law. Further, it guided state governments to create systems to understand the privileges of “third sex”/transsexual people.

Fundamental Rights

The court deciphered ‘nobility’ under article 21 of the constitution to remember decent variety for self-articulation, which permitted an individual to have a stately existence. It put one’s sexual orientation character inside the structure of the basic right to respect under article 21. Further, it noticed that the privilege of uniformity (article 14 of the constitution) and opportunity of articulation (article 19(1) (a)) was surrounded in sexually unbiased terms (“all people”). Therefore, the privilege to balance and opportunity of articulation would stretch out to transsexual people. It caused to notice the way that transsexual people were dependent upon “outrageous separation in all circles of society” which was an infringement of their entitlement to uniformity. Further, it incorporated the option to communicate one’s sexual orientation “through dress, words, activity, or conduct” under the ambit of the opportunity of articulation. Under articles 15 and 16, separation on the ground of “sex” is unequivocally disallowed. The court held that “sex” here doesn’t just allude to natural credits, (for example, chromosomes, genitalia, and optional sexual attributes) yet additionally incorporates “sex” (in light of one’s self-recognition). Accordingly, the court held that segregation on the ground of “sex” remembered separation for the premise of sexual orientation character. Accordingly, the court held that transsexual people were qualified for central rights under articles 14, 15, 16, 19(1) (a), and 21 of the constitution. Further, the court additionally alluded to center global common liberties arrangements and the Yogyakarta principles to perceive transsexual people’s basic freedoms.

Judgment

  • The Court has guided Centre and State Governments to allow legitimate acknowledgment of sexual orientation personality whether it be male, female or third-sex:
  • Legitimate Recognition for the Third Gender: In perceiving the third sexual orientation classification, the Court perceived that key rights are accessible to the third sex in a similar way as they are to guys and females. Further, non-acknowledgment of the third sex in both lawbreakers and common resolutions, for example, those identifying with marriage, appropriation, separate, and so on is oppressive to the transsexual.
  • Legitimate Recognition for Persons progressing inside male/female parallel: As for how the real methodology of acknowledgment will occur, the Court just expresses that they like to follow the mind of the individual and utilize the “Mental Test’ instead of the ‘Organic Test.’ They likewise announce that demanding Sex Reassignment Surgery (SRS) as a condition for changing one’s sexual orientation is illicit.
  • General Health and Sanitation: Centre and State Governments have been coordinated to take legitimate measures to give clinical consideration to transsexuals in medical clinics and give them separate public latrines and different offices. Further, they have been coordinated to work separate HIV/Siro-reconnaissance measures for transsexuals.
  • Financial Rights: Centre and State Governments have been approached to give the network different social government assistance plans and to regard the network as socially and monetarily in reverse classes. They have additionally been approached to broaden reservations in instructive establishments and for public arrangements.
  • Disgrace and Public Awareness: These are the broadest headings – Centre and State Governments were approached to find a way to make public attention to more readily help consolidate transsexuals into society and end treatment as untouchables; take measures to recapture their regard and spot in the public eye; and truly address the issues, for example, dread, disgrace, sexual orientation dysphoria, social weight, melancholy, self-destructive inclinations, and social shame.
  • The Court noticed that these assertions are to be perused considering the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment Expert Committee Report on issues identifying with transsexuals.

Directions to Central Government

The Court held that public mindfulness programs were needed to handle disgrace against the transsexual network. It likewise guided the Central and State Governments to make a few strides for the headway of the transsexual network, including Making arrangements for lawful acknowledgment of “third sexual orientation” in all reports Perceiving third sexual orientation people as a “socially and instructively in the reverse class of residents”, qualified for reservations in instructive organizations and public work. Finding a way to outline social government assistance plans for the network.

  1. Award legitimate acknowledgment of their sex personality, for example, male, female, or as third sexual orientation.
  2. Find a way to regard them as socially and instructively in reverse classes of residents and broaden a wide range of reservation in instances of confirmation in instructive foundations and for public arrangements.
  3. Work separate HIV Siro-surveillance Centers since Hijras/Transgenders face a few sexual medical problems.
  4. Truly address the issues being looked by Hijras/Transgenders, for example, dread, disgrace, sexual orientation dysphoria, social weight, despondency, self-destructive inclinations, social shame, and so on and any demand for SRS for pronouncing one’s sex is indecent and unlawful.
  5. Take legitimate measures to give clinical consideration to TGs in the clinics and give them separate public latrines and different offices.
  6. Make strides for surrounding different social government assistance plans for their advancement.
  7. Find a way to make public mindfulness so TGs will feel that they are likewise a vital part of the public activity and be not treated as untouchables.
  8. Take measures to recapture their regard and spot in the general public which once they delighted in our social and public activity.

Latest Posts


This article has been written by Navneet Chandra. Picture credits to WordPress.com

Introduction

Competition means economic rivalry between entities or companies, to draw the highest number of consumers and earn the most profit. Competition law is also called in some countries as Antitrust law. Free and fair competition is essential for creating and maintaining an environment conducive to business and a prosperous country. The objective of all competition laws, around the world is to ensure an environment where all companies compete fairly. The first act introduced in India for regulation of competition was Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. When the Act was found to be inadequate, a new act called the Competition Act, 2002 was introduced.

History

Raghavan Committee in 1999 recommended that a new legislation should be framed for competition law for the country, because although the MRTP Act had provisions relating to anti-competitive practices, it was found to be inadequate in comparison to other countries, for encouraging competition in the industry and also for reduction of anti-competitive practices.

About the Act

The object of this Act is to create an environment that promotes competition and safeguard the independence to do business. The Act states in its Objects and Reasons that because of globalization, India has opened up its economy to the world, removed restrictions and controls and liberalized the economy. The preamble provides for the establishment of a Commission to prevent practices having adverse effect on competition and also promotion of and sustenance of competition in markets. The aim is to protect the interest of the public. The domination of a firm is decided on the basis of firm’s structure. The act is punitive in character. It seeks to promote competition.

Evolution and Development of Competition Law in India

India adopted its first competition law way back in 1969 in the form of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP). The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Bill was introduced in the Parliament in the year 1967 and the same was referred to the Joint Select Committee. The MRTP Act, 1969 came into force, with effect from, 1 June, 1970. However, with the changing nature of business, market, economy on the whole within and outside India, there was felt a necessity to replace the obsolete law by the new competition law and hence the MRTP Act was replaced with the Competition Act of 2002.

The enactment of MRTP Act, 1969 was based on the socio – economic philosophy enshrined in the Directive Principles of State Policy contained in the Constitution of India. The MRTP Act, 1969 underwent amendments in 1974, 1980, 1982, 1984, 1986, 1988 and 1991. The amendments introduced in the year 1982 and 1984 were based on the recommendations of the Sachar Committee, which was constituted by the Govt. of India under the Chairmanship of Justice Rajinder Sachar in the year 1977.

The Sachar Committee pointed out that advertisements and sales promotions having become well established modes of modern business techniques, representations through such advertisements to the consumer should not become deceptive. The Committee also noted that fictitious bargain was another common form of deception and many devices were used to lure buyers into believing that they were getting something for nothing or at a nominal value for their money. The Committee recommended that an obligation is to be cast on the seller to speak the truth when he advertises and also to avoid half-truth, the purpose being preventing false or misleading advertisements.

However, as the times changed, the need was felt for a new competition law. With introduction of new economic policy and opening up of the Indian market to the world, there was a need to shift focus from curbing monopolies to promoting competition in the Indian market.

In October 1999, the Government of India constituted a High Level Committee under the Chairmanship of Mr. SVS Raghavan [‘Raghavan Committee’]to advise a modern competition law for the country in line with international developments and to suggest legislative framework, which may entail a new law or suitable amendments in the MRTP Act, 1969. The Raghavan Committee presented its report to the Government in May 2000.

The committee inter alia noted: In conditions of effective competition, rivals have equal opportunities to compete for business on the basis and quality of their outputs, and resource deployment follows market success in meeting consumers’ demand at the lowest possible cost.

On the basis of the recommendations of the Raghavan Committee, a draft competition law was prepared and presented in November 2000 to the Government and the Competition Bill was introduced in the Parliament, which referred the Bill to its Standing Committee. After considering the recommendations of the Standing Committee, the Parliament passed December 2002 the Competition Act, 2002. Hence, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 [MRTP Act] was repealed and was replaced by the Competition Act, 2002, with effect from 1 September, 2009.

Conclusion

India and the world were going through a new phase of globalisation, liberalisation and privatisation and these changing times were bringing newer challenges and the existing MRTP Act had become obsolete in the modern era. Hence the new Competition Act came into being in order to suit the need of the hour. The new act is based on the regulation of conduct or behaviour of the players in the market and is result oriented rather than being procedure oriented like the MRTP Act.

Further its main purpose is to protect and promote competition in the market. Competition is very essential as it benefits: the Consumers as they get wider choice of goods and services, better quality and improved value for money; it benefits the Businesses as a level playing field is created and a redressal of anti-competitive practices is available, the inputs are competitive priced, they tend to have greater productivity and ability to compete in global markets and finally it also benefits the state as there is optimal realisation from sale of assets and there is enhanced availability of resources for social sector.

Thus, by protecting competition in the market the competition law helps benefit all the players in the market which in turn is beneficial for the economy as a whole.

Latest Posts