Tag: #Article51A

Indian Legislative on Hazardous Waste Management

Posted on
S.noContents
1.Introduction
2.Types of Hazardous Wastes
3.Legislator Framework in India
4.Regulatory Framework in India
5.Ineffectiveness of Law
6.Case Laws of Hazardous Wastes
7.Conclusion

Abstract

This article aims to present an overview of hazardous waste and types of hazardous waste. Further it explain the legislative and regulatory framework in India and after that ineffectiveness of the Law.

Introduction

Human beings always create waste materials which are produced by daily to daily life activities. Activities like washing utensils, washing the floor and sewage water.

Hazardous waste means “danger”. Hazardous waste is very dangerous for our life. Hazardous waste includes so many wastes like harmful medicines, harmful chemicals and harmful industrial waste. Hazardous waste affects our lives in so many ways our skin gets irritated, our eyes become red, breathing rate problems and hair problems create. Pesticides are also included in hazardous waste.

Hazardous waste is very toxic for us and hazardous waste creates so many diseases. Hazardous waste is created by pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and industrial and commercial areas. Hazardous waste means any material that is potentially catastrophic to the environment or human health. This type of waste includes chemicals, toxins, flammable materials, and radioactive substances. Hazardous waste can come from a variety of sources, including industrial processes, medical facilities, and households.

The proper handling and disposal of hazardous waste are crucial to prevent harm to humans and the environment. When not handled properly, hazardous waste can contaminate water, soil, and air, leading to serious health problems, including cancer, birth defects, and neurological disorders.

To reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated, it is important to implement practices such as reducing the use of hazardous materials, reusing products when possible, and recycling. In addition, it is essential to properly label and store hazardous waste and to dispose of it in a safe and environmentally friendly manner.

Types of Hazardous Wastes

There are four classifications of hazardous wastes are as follows –
F-list waste
K-list waste
P-list waste
U-list waste

F-LIST WASTE –
It is a classification of hazardous waste. It doesn’t come from a specific industry. It comes from a mix industry. We didn’t identify the industry of F-waste.

F-list waste includes –
Dioxin-bearing wastes
Wood-preserving wastes
Chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons
Spent solvent wastes

K-LIST WASTE –
After the F-list, we read about the k-list. K-list waste is more specific than F-list. We identify the industry of k-list waste. The k-list waste came from industrial waste.

K-list waste includes –
Organic chemicals manufacturing
Primary aluminium production
Ink formulation
Petroleum refining

P-LIST WASTE –
After the K-list waste, we read about P-list. P-list waste is highly toxic. P-list wastes are unused and they are a part of commercial chemical products. Pesticides are part of the P-list.

U-LIST WASTE –
After the U-list waste, we read about U-list, U-list waste is less toxic as compared to the list. We use U-list waste properly so they are not hazardous for us but we do not use them properly so they are hazardous for us.

Legislator Framework in India

Human beings’ duty is to protect nature for natural resources for the future. In Constitution, Part IV-A ( Article 51-A fundamental duties ) says that every human being duty to protect nature against hazardous waste and any other kind of danger. Human beings use natural resources for the future so they have a responsibility to take care the nature.
Further, Part IV (Article 48A directive principles of State Policies) says that the state also has a duty to protect nature and take proper actions to protect nature.

State and human beings have equal responsibilities to protect nature. A well-developed framework came after the UN Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm,1972). After the Stockholm Conference, the National Council for Environmental Policy and Planning was established in 1972 inside the Department of Science and Technology to introduce a regulatory body to look after environment-related issues. Later, This Council developed into an entire Ministry of Environment and Forests and Climate Change (MoEF & CL).

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates hazardous waste disposal through the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). This law establishes levels for the management of hazardous waste, consisting of essentials for its transportation, generation, storage, treatment, and disposal.

Businesses and organizations that generate hazardous waste must comply with RCRA regulations by obtaining permits and implementing proper waste management practices. Failure to obey these rules can result in fines and other penalties.

Regulatory Framework in India

The regulatory framework for hazardous waste varies by country, but in general, it involves a combination of national and international laws and regulations. Here are some key components of the regulatory framework for hazardous waste:

  • National laws and regulations: Many countries have national laws and regulations that govern the generation, handling, transport, treatment, and disposal of hazardous waste. For example, in the United States, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) sets standards for the management of hazardous waste, while in the European Union, the Waste Framework Directive provides a framework for the management of waste, including hazardous waste.
  • International conventions and agreements: Several international conventions and agreements have been established to address hazardous waste on a global scale. These consist of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal, which monitors the current of hazardous waste between countries, and the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, which seeks to eliminate or restrict the use of persistent organic pollutants (POPs).
  • Permitting and reporting requirements: Many countries require permits for facilities that generate, handle, treat, or dispose of hazardous waste. These permits may require facilities to meet certain standards for waste management and may include reporting requirements for the amount and type of waste generated.
  • Enforcement mechanisms: Laws and regulations related to hazardous waste typically include enforcement mechanisms, such as fines, penalties, and criminal sanctions for non-compliance. In addition, regulatory agencies may conduct inspections and audits of facilities to ensure compliance with the regulations.
  • Monitoring and tracking: Many countries have systems in place to monitor and track hazardous waste, from its generation to its final disposal. This may include the use of tracking manifests, electronic reporting systems, and inspections of waste transporters and disposal facilities.

Overall, the regulatory framework for hazardous waste is designed to protect human health and the environment by ensuring that hazardous waste is managed safely and responsibly. By implementing effective regulations and enforcing them consistently, countries can reduce the risks associated with hazardous waste and minimize its impact on the environment.

India has proper amendments about hazardous wastes are as follows –

  • First Amendments Rules, 06.07.2016
    In the exercise of powers given by sections 6, 8 and 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 ( 29 of 1986), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016, namely:-
    • These rules may be known as Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016.
    • They shall come into exercise on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
  • Second Amendments Rules, 28.02.2017
  • Third Amendments Rules, 11.06.2018
  • Fourth Amendments Rules, 01.03.2019
  • Second Amendments Rules, 12.11.2021
  • Sixth Amendments Rules, 21.07.2022

Ineffectiveness of Law

While there are laws and regulations in place to manage hazardous waste, there are still several factors that can lead to the ineffectiveness of these laws. Here are a few reasons why hazardous waste laws may be ineffective:

  1. Inadequate enforcement: Even with strong regulations and penalties for non-compliance, the laws may not be effective if they are not enforced consistently and rigorously. Lack of funding, resources, and political will can all contribute to inadequate enforcement.
  2. Loopholes and exemptions: Some hazardous waste laws may contain exemptions or loopholes that allow certain industries or activities to avoid compliance. For example, some laws may not apply to small businesses or may have less stringent requirements for certain types of waste.
  3. Lack of transparency: In some cases, hazardous waste may be illegally dumped or transported without proper documentation or tracking. This can make it difficult to identify and hold responsible parties accountable for their actions.
  4. Rapidly evolving technology and waste streams: Hazardous waste laws may not keep up with the rapid pace of technological innovation and changing waste streams. New types of waste and emerging technologies for waste management may not be adequately covered by existing laws, leaving gaps in regulation.
  5. Limited international cooperation: Hazardous waste is a global problem, and effective regulation requires international cooperation and coordination. However, there may be limited cooperation between different countries and regions, leading to disparities in regulation and enforcement.

Overall, the effectiveness of hazardous waste laws depends on a range of factors, including enforcement, exemptions, transparency, technological innovation, and international cooperation. Addressing these issues can help to improve the effectiveness of hazardous waste regulation and protect human health and the environment.

Case Laws of Hazardous Wastes

  • Love Canal (1970s): Love Canal was a neighbourhood in Niagara Falls, New York, where Hooker Chemical Company dumped 21,000 tons of toxic waste from the 1940s to the 1950s. In the 1970s, residents began experiencing health problems, and investigations revealed that the waste had contaminated the soil and groundwater. This led to the evacuation of the neighbourhood and the creation of the Superfund program, which provides funding for the cleanup of hazardous waste sites.
  • Bhopal disaster (1984): The Bhopal disaster was a gas leak from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, owned by Union Carbide Corporation. The leak released toxic gas into the air, causing the deaths of over 3,000 people and injuring thousands more. The disaster highlighted the need for better safety regulations for hazardous industries and raised awareness of the environmental and human health impacts of hazardous waste.
  • Koko Chemical Company (1988): Koko Chemical Company was a chemical company in Taiwan that illegally dumped hazardous waste, including PCBs, into the ocean. The waste contaminated the fish in the area, leading to a ban on fishing and a public health crisis. The company’s CEO was sentenced to life in prison, and the case led to increased scrutiny of hazardous waste management practices in Taiwan.
  • Ivory Coast toxic waste dumping (2006): In 2006, a company called Trafigura chartered a ship to transport hazardous waste from Amsterdam to Ivory Coast. The waste was dumped illegally in various locations around Abidjan, the country’s largest city, leading to thousands of people reporting health problems. The incident prompted calls for stronger regulations on the transport and disposal of hazardous waste.

These cases illustrate the serious consequences that can arise from improper management and disposal of hazardous waste and highlight the importance of regulations and enforcement to protect human health and the environment.

Conclusion

Hazardous waste control by using windmills, solar energy and so many things come from nature so they produce less waste. We use natural things instead of made chemicals. Chemicals are full of toxicity. Chemicals are very dangerous for our life and animals also. Dogs and cats and so many animals are also in danger with us. Hazardous wastes are very dangerous for small children. Pregnant women and elders are also away from hazardous wastes. 

We take proper steps to get over this problem as follows – 

  • We use natural things
  • We don’t use plastic bags 
  • Sewage waste 

In Delhi, a huge mountain is formed by waste so this is dangerous for our life. Due to this Ganga is also polluted and in festivals, we bathe in Ganga and do puja also due to the puja waste increase. Diya’s and flowers float in Ganga. We control this custom so that our future generation enjoy the fresh air and Ganga. We buy clothes so mindlessly due to this also waste is produced. We throw packets of milk, Maggi and lays in dustbin and we cannot cut properly so we cannot recycle these packets and they become waste. We mix wet waste and dry waste. We didn’t purchase clothes mindlessly and we cut the packets in a proper way so that we recycle them. 

Some clothes are not recyclable in nature so we cannot use or minimise the usage of that cloth. We didn’t mix the wet and dry waste so that waste is recyclable and that waste does not become hazardous waste. In the current scenario, waste is increasing day by day and they create threatening situations for us we cannot help us. Executive and legislative both make effective laws with sanction so that waste products is decreased. Pollution is created by waste. Pollution is also very bad for our health. 

Overall, it is important to understand the dangers associated with hazardous waste and to take steps to reduce its generation and properly manage and dispose of it. By doing so, we can protect human health and the environment for generations to come.

Reference

  1. https://cpcb.nic.in/rules/

This article is written by Varsha Goel, a 2nd-year law student at Kurukshetra University.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING

Posted on

INTRODUCTION

Human trafficking is the type of modern-day slavery in which a person is sold or used forcefully for the point of labor or commercial sex act. This is all that happens to intend to earn money. Human trafficking is not just a heinous crime against society but is a sin for our society. It has no boundaries for anyone irrespective of sex, gender, caste, or race anyone can be a victim of human trafficking but the most vulnerable ones are women and children. Children being innocent and getting easily influenced by others became victims of sexual acts. Due to the overpopulation and lack of job opportunities, many women from poor families are forced to get indulged in this profession and in some cases, a close family member becomes the hoes and sells them for such work.

According to the survey of the United Nations Office for drugs and crime [UNODC], it was found that the victim of human trafficking were 51% women, 28% children, and 21% men. Majorly women were abused by sexual violence which is 51%, 28% for children, and 21% for men. There are 43% of victims who are domestically within the national borders have been trafficked, it is shocking to know that the traffickers are not only men but it also constitutes 37% of women and 63% of men.

Some articles in the constitution are related to human trafficking.

ARTICLE 23
Article 23 talks about the prohibition of human trafficking and forced labor. Forced labor means less than minimum wage is paid. Any trafficking in human beings and beggars is prohibited and punishable in accordance with the law. In this article, the state is not prevented from commanding compulsory services for public purposes. The state shall not discriminate based on sex, color, caste, race, or any other. This article not only protects the state but also private citizens.1

ARTICLE 21
Article 21 is a fundamental right under part 3 of the Indian constitution, which talks about the right to life and personal liberties. It is one of the most essential articles in the Indian constitution. The supreme court of India mentioned it as the ‘heart of fundamental rights ‘. It states that no person shall be deprived of life and liberty except as per the procedure established by law. Everyone is entitled to live with full dignity by birth.2

ARTICLE 51 A [E]
Article 51 A [e] is a fundamental duty to promote Peace, Harmony, and a sense of unity amongst the people of India cut across linguistic, religious, and regional basis, to repudiate practices that can be insulting to women.3

LAWS RELATED TO HUMAN TRAFFICKING

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860

  • SECTION 366A
    If any person induces any minor to go with him to any other place with the intention of seducing her or doing illicit activities he or she will be punishable with the imprisonment of 10 years or fine or both.4
  • SECTION 366B
    Whoever imports a girl from any other country under the age twenty one with the intent to force or seduce her for intercourse with another person then, a person can be liable for imprisonment of 10 years and a fine can also be imposed.5
  • SECTION 374
    This section deals with unlawfully forcing someone to labor against their will or desire. Such a person can be punished with imprisonment which can be extended to 1 year or fine or both.6
  • SECTION 370
    Whomever imports, exports, removes, buys, sells, or disposes of any person as a slave, or accepts, receives, or detains any person as a slave against his will, will be punished by imprisonment of either kind for a duration up to seven years, as well as a fine.7

THE IMMORAL TRAFFIC [PREVENTION] ACT, 1956

This act was passed by the parliament of India in 1956 and the main objective or purpose of this act is to prevent commercial sex or immoral traffic among women and girls. This act covers the entire country. This act defines a brothel as a “house or any portion of the house, room or any portion of any room, conveyance or portion of any conveyance, and place or portion of any place.” And prostitution is “the sexual exploitation or abuse of persons for commercial purposes or consideration in money or any other kind.” In this act, if any person runs a brothel or aid in such activities then he or she will be punishable with imprisonment for one year which can be extended to 3 years, and a fine of rupees 2000 can also be imposed. If any tenant knowing allows them to use the property for such use then he or she can be imprisoned for two years and a fine of rupees 2000 can also be imposed on them.

THE ANTI TRAFFICKING BILL, 2021

This bill focuses on the prevention of human trafficking, providing rehabilitation cure compensation to the victims, and providing stringent punishments for the traffickers. The early bill of 2018 was never introduced in the Lok Sabha. The 2021 bill is different from the previous bill as it also extends outside India. In this bill, the national investigation agency will also be set up. This will also include transgenders along with women and children in the definition of a victim. The central government will also set up a national anti-trafficking committee and many committees will be set up at state and district levels for the better implementation of rules and regulations.

CASE LAWS

PEOPLE’S UNION FOR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS VS UNION OF INDIA
In this case, the people’s union of democratic rights filed a writ petition before the supreme court of India under Article 32 of the Indian constitution for the violation of fundamental rights and certain rights for laborers.8 People union of democratic rights is an organization set up to make a report on the exploitation of living conditions of laborers under contractors. In this case, the court defined forced labor under article 23, forced labor basically means employing labor and providing them wages which is less than the minimum wage rate. In this case, the court held that forced labor is a violation of the fundamental right of article 23 and the person can file a writ petition under Article 32 for the violation of their fundamental rights.9

LAXMI KANT PANDEY VS UNION OF INDIA
In this case, a writ petition was filed by Laxmi Kant Pandey regarding the malpractices in adopting children from foreign parents. This case brings to highlight the need for having rules and regulations regarding intercountry adoptions. The children go to another country and get neglected by their adopted parents, making a toxic and unhealthy environment for the children and resulting in sexual exploitation. To proving protection to the intercountry adopted children a comprehensive framework was formed. In this it was decided that the international adoptions would follow the regulations of the guardians and wards act, 1860 and the provisions of articles 15[3], 24, and 39 along with the united nations declaration on the rights of the child. It was made mandatory for foreigners to be sponsored by the licensed agencies of their country.10

GAURAV JAIN VS UNION OF INDIA
In this case, the public interest litigation was filed before the supreme court by the advocate to set up a distinct education system for the children of prostitutes and get them educated so that they didn’t have to live undesirable and the life full of misery. The court held that having separate schools for the children of prostitutes will isolate them and will be against the well-being of the children and society in general. The supreme court set up a committee consisting of advocates and social workers to look into the matter and find solutions. The court held that the prostitutes are not offenders but they are the victim of unfavorable socio-economic conditions and to set up juvenile homes for the rehabilitation and the safety of children.11

CONCLUSION

There are many provisions related to human trafficking which are both domestically and globally recognized but still, there are numerous cases of human trafficking in our country. Human trafficking violated fundamental rights and constitutional rights and human rights of the people just for the sake of earning monetary benefits. Women and children are the victims of human trafficking people take advantage of the innocent behavior of the children and get them involved in sexual exploitation. In a country where there are fewer jobs for more people applying they are left unemployed and for the need for money women are forced to take up prostitution. Making laws and provisions is not enough this is an issue of great concern and it is needed to be seen from a socio-economic perspective also. The government should provide them with jobs so that they can live with dignity and comfort. Awareness related to human trafficking should be spread in schools among students. High-quality education should be promoted in government schools and colleges. This is a grave crime and needed to be lookup at in creating a safe and healthy environment for children and women to live in.

References:

  1. The Indian constitution, 1950, art.23
  2. The Indian constitution,1950, Art 21
  3. Indian constitution, 1950,Art 51A[E]
  4. Indian Penal Code, 1860, section 366 A
  5. Indian penal code, 1860, Section 366B
  6. Indian penal code, 1860 section 374
  7. Indian penal code, 1860 section 370
  8. Indian constitution,1950,Art.32
  9. People union of democratic rights vs union of India, [1982 AIR 1473]
  10. Laxmi Kant Pandey vs Union of India, [[1984 AIR 469]
  11. Gaurav Jain vs Union of India, [{1997} 8 SCC 114]

This article is written by Prerna Pahwa, a student of Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, New Delhi.

T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD V/s UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Posted on

CITATION OF THE CASE

Writ Petition (civil) 202 of 1995

DATE OF CASE

December 12, 1996

APPELLANT

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad

RESPONDENT

Union of India & Ors

BENCH/JUDGES

Y.K. Sabharwal, Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia

STATUTES INVOLVED

Article 48A, Article 51A of The Constitution of India, Section 2 of forest conservation act.

INTRODUCTION

A writ request in the Supreme Court was recorded by T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad in 1995, to shield the Nilgiris woods land from deforestation by unlawful lumber activity. The incredible meaning of point associated with these issues, relating to insurance and preservation of woodland in the entire region. The court framed the assessment that this issue of backwoods security required a profundity hearing to see every one of the perspectives connected with public timberland strategy. Notwithstanding, it thought that couple of vital headings were needed regarding certain parts of the woods law the country over. The court gave specific itemized bearings for feasible utilization of timberland and directed the observing and execution framework through the country at various state-level networks controlling the utilization, recording, and development of wood the nation over in a perspective on assurance of public woodlands. The court even goes through every one of the parts of National Forest strategy the woods preservation act exhaustively to secure the backwoods.

T.N. Godavarman has expected a fundamental part concerning the protection and protection of the environment. He has different public interest cases to his advantage which oversee protection contemplations and concurring with nature. Normal law is a space of public significance that has been seen with the help of various NGOs and private affiliations. The zenith court has expected the piece of a driving force in safeguarding the natural concerns by articulating different achievement choices. This has prompted the development of an unheard-of level of the rule that began with absolute liability. As of now, it consolidates thoughts, for example, polluter pays rule, conservative development, and judicious rules.

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

At the point of convergence of the contention is an extremely huge task of the Uttar Pradesh government at Noida. According to the candidates, the endeavor is a “gigantic unapproved development”. The applicants express that innumerable trees were hacked down to clear the ground for the assignment. These trees outlined a “woodland” as the term was deciphered by this Court in its solicitation dated December 12, 1996, in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad v. Association of India and Ors., (1997) 2 SCC 267 (1) and the action of the Uttar Pradesh Government in cleaving down a genuine woodland without the prior authorization of the Central Government and this Court, was in net encroachment of segment 2(ii) of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The Central Empowered Committee CEC on a thought about the overall large number of materials made available to it, including the report of the FSI, held that the endeavor site was not a forest area or a considered forest or woodlands like the district similar to the solicitation for SC, fundamentally, because the trees in the endeavor locale that were cleaved down for representing the improvements were established trees and not ordinarily evolved trees, and because the area was neither exhorted as “forest area” nor recorded as “forest area” in the Government record. The Court held that the endeavor site isn’t woodlands land and the improvement of the assignment without the previous assent from the Central Government doesn’t in any way go against segment 2 of the FC Act.

FACTS OF THE CASE

By T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Association of India, the Supreme Court left behind the common occupation of an interpreter of the law. This milestone case is generally called ‘the Forest Case in India’ This is because there was a legal violation of the established command when the Supreme Court accepted command over the inquiries of this case. It was concerning the control and oversight of the woods of India. T.N. Godavarman halted a writ claim in the year 1995 in the summit court of India. The central target of the writ demand was to safeguard and secure the woodland place where there is the Nilgiris as it was mishandled through deforestation by unlawful lumber works out. The key component of this case was that it was to save the backwoods. It was trailed by a gathering at full length concerning the National Forest Policy.

This was seen as break orientation that was required in the material issue. This was to look at the necessity and execution of woodland laws and rules inside the subcontinent of India. The Supreme Court provided requests to use the timberland land and its resources financially. Moreover, told that it’s everything except a self-checking part at the same time. The court communicated that an execution system should be molded at the regional and state level. This
was to control the transportation of wood.

Godavarman Thirumulpad had numerous pundits. It deals with the regular honors of all and the intercession of the court. Just intercession or the encroachments of the court can be rehearsed exactly when they are required. Legitimate interventions happen when the state misses the mark in its commitment to work. The most prominent interventions made by the court recollect the blacklist for the tree felling, direct wood adventures, the forbiddance of mining in Kudremukh, and with Aravallis, the rule of sawmills. Most of the striking judgment on woods organization is the burden of obligation known as Present Value for the utilization of backwoods land for non-officer administration purposes, the underpinning of the Compensatory Afforestation Fund, or CAMPA, and henceforth the course of action of searching for previous support from the Supreme Court for any business activity. Subsequently, exclusive’s work to stop timberland annihilation in Gudalur incited a watershed legal intervention, which has fundamentally added to the assurance of forests. Godavarman Thirumulpad will remain inside legitimate history.

ISSUE RAISED BEFORE THE COURT

  • Whether the new translation for Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act and forest land is violative and regardless of whether the utilization of timber for business purposes is justified?
  • The issue is regarding the determination of the environment and majorly damage to the forest which were wealthy in the natural resources begin with the expanding the needs of individual emerging because of a move to industrialization, migration to an urban area, need more land for cultivation housing and other purposes.

JUDGMENT

It is a fundamental circumstance of the environment especially of the climate. T.N. Godavaraman, understanding the circumstance of the backwoods and being a careful inhabitant of India, couldn’t as yet keep away from relying upon defying such illegal practices. He went to the Indian lawful leader searching for some help from the Supreme Court.

On 12 December 1996, a seat drove by Chief Justice J.S. Verma passed an interval request organizing that tree-felling and non-ranger service administration development in forestland the country over be ended. The way-breaking request redescribed the meaning of forestland and loosened up protection to all spaces with regular woods no matter what their proprietorship. It set out that ‘timberlands’ will be seen by its promise reference meaning and the arrangement of the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980, will apply to all thickly lush areas. States were composed to frame ace chambers to recognize backwoods as characterized and record reports. Senior Counsel Harish Salve was assigned Amicus Curie to help the Supreme Court. What followed was amazing. A couple of northeastern States, where backwoods were being assaulted by groups and unregulated sawmills worked straightforwardly, were shaken. A limitation on the advancement of illicit lumber was constrained. 94 rail route trucks of wrongfully sent wood were seized. At that stage, even the Supreme Court no doubt didn’t anticipate that the matter would be saved open for close to 20 years. However, luckily, it is alluded to in the set-up rule as the Writ of continuing with mandamus. More than 1,000 Interlocutory Applications have since been recorded, covering a scope of issues concerning boondocks protection, such as mining, tree-felling, the leaders of Protected Areas, and forest encroachment.

Considering the rising number of IAs and u thought of the issues being referred to, the court requested the constitution of a specialist body, the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), in May 2002. In September 2002 it was educated as a lawful leading body of legal administrators with wide-going powers to oversee impending IAs, hear new applications, and pass orders in consonance with those of the Supreme Court. Another perspective in the association of forests had been made. The omnibus backwoods case is at this point open yet under unique hearing any longer into its 20th year. The CEC continues, yet not as a legitimate warning gathering.

CONCLUSION

This case included the necessity for staying aware of and anticipating timberland helpfulness. It works with the assurance of organic variety. Similarly, safeguarding and getting biological conditions were discussed for the present circumstance. The consequence of the T.N. Godavarman v. Association of India and Ors notices the diminishing and the finish of different wood ventures. It moreover settled natural mindfulness among the occupants of India. It refused deforestation stringently. This case has gone probably as an improvement in environmental safeguarding and insurance for an enormous scope. The essential responsibility of this case was the powerful and smooth movement of various laws in doing natural activities.

References

  1. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 July, 2011. indiankanoon.org. [Online] https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1725193/.

Written by Sara Agrawal student at Sinhgad Law College, Pune.

Secularism in India and the Indian Constitution

Posted on

Introduction

The word ‘Secular’ means that a person is separate from religion and has no religious basis. Secularism means that religion is kept unconnected with the social, political, cultural, and economic spheres of life. Religion is open to everyone and gives an individual his personal choice to accept and follow any religion without any discrimination.

Philosophy of Indian Secularism

The term ‘secularism’ is like the Vedic concept of ‘Dharma nirapekshata’ which means the State’s indifference to religion. It has two principles: 

1) Religion should not interfere in the administration and policy-making of the state. 

2) People of all religions are equal before the law, constitution, and government policy.

This model of secularism is adopted by some western societies where the govt. is completely unconnected with religion.

Indian philosophy of secularism is connected to “Sarva Dharma Sambhava” (it means to treat all the religions with the same emotions, same zeal and zest irrespective of the religion a person follows and more than that it gives the idea of mankind and humanity) which suggests the same context for all religions. 

This concept was embraced and promoted by great personalities like Swami Vivekananda and Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and they called it ‘Positive secularism’ that reflects the dominant ethos of Indian culture.

India has no official state religion. However, different personal laws are there on matters like marriage, divorce, inheritance, alimony, etc. which vary with a person’s religion.

Indian secularism isn’t an end in itself but a way to deal with religious plurality and to achieve the peaceful coexistence of various religions.

Secularism and the Indian Constitution

The core ethos of India has been a synthesis of fundamental unity, tolerance, and even faith. It’s an undebatable fact that thousands of Indians belonging to diverse religions lived together through the ages, marred through sometimes by religious revolts, economic exploitation, and social suppression being often at the rock bottom of it all.

India is the birthplace of 4 major world religions: Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. Yet, India is one among the foremost diverse nation in terms of faith and religion. India is a country that is built on the foundations of a civilization that’s fundamentally non-religious.

The purpose of the Preamble of the Indian Constitution is to make India a Sovereign, Socialist, Democratic Republic. The 42nd Amendment Act of the constitution added the terms such as socialist and secular. The entire constitution is summarized within the preamble. This mirrors the spirit of the Constitution. The arrangement of words in the preamble is also very important. Indian society is a multi-religious society, it is having different caste, religions alongside several religious diversifications. So, all of these are divisive features somehow and if not handled carefully then it can cause a threat to the unity and integrity of the state.

All the basic principles of secularism are included in the various provisions of the Constitution. The word ‘Secular’ was added to the preamble by the 42nd Constitution Amendment Act of 1976. The Constitution emphasizes the fact that constitutionally, India is a secular country with no state religion and that the State shall recognize and accept all religions, shall not favor or protect any particular religion.

  • Article 14 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws to everyone, Article 15 prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.
  • Article 16 (1) guarantees equality of opportunity to all citizens in matters of public employment and appointment and that there would be no discrimination on the basis of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth and residence.
  • Article 25 gives freedom of conscience and of practicing any profession or religion.
  • Article 26 gives every religious group or individual the right to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes and to manage its own affairs in matters of religion.
  • Article 27 says that no citizen shall be compelled by the state to pay any kind of taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious institution.
  • Article 28 allows educational institutions maintained by different religious groups to impart religious instruction.
  • Article 29 talks about the protection of minorities’ interests. 
  • Article 30 provides rights to minorities to administer and establish educational institutions.
  • Article 51A talks about Fundamental Duties that obliges all the citizens of India to abide by the constitution and respect its institutions, ideals, national anthem and the national flag and to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood and therefore to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture.

Threats to Secularism

Even though the Indian Constitution declares India to be absolutely neutral to all religions, our society is submerged in religion.

The union of religion and politics has threatened Indian secularism, which seeks to mobilize voters on the basis of fundamental identities such as religion, caste, and ethnicity.

Communal politics operates through the communalization of social space by spreading myths and stereotypes against minorities, attacking rational values, and practicing divisive ideological propaganda and politics.

The politicization of any one religious group leads to the competitive politicization of other groups, thereby leading to inter-religious conflict.

One of the manifestations of communalism is communal riots. In recent times also, communalism has proved to be a major threat to the secular fabric of Indian politics.

The rise of Hindu nationalism in recent years has resulted in mob lynchings simply because they suspect people of killing cows and eating beef.

In addition, forced closure of slaughterhouses, campaigns against ‘love jihad’, conversions or Ghar-wapsi (forcing Muslims to convert to Hinduism), etc. reinforces the communal tendency in the society.

Islamic fundamentalism or revivalism emphasizes the establishment of an Islamic State based on Sharia law which directly contradicts the notions of a secular and democratic state.

In recent years there have been sporadic incidents of Muslim youth being inspired and radicalized by groups like ISIS which is very unfortunate for both India and the world.

Conclusion

It needs to be understood that just by writing the term ‘secularism’ in the books, any state cannot be truly secular. Thus, the whole ideology should be recognized with grace and should be applied equally to all people. And there should be a check on the governmental bodies for propagating any unfair practice of religious groups to acquire power.

Bibliography

  1. Dr. J. N. Pandey, Constitutional Law of India.
  2. Secularism, https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/secularism/.
  3. Secularism and Constitution of India: Unity in Diversity, http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1964/Secularism-and-Constitution-of-India.html. 
  4. Secularism, https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/paper1/secularism-1.
  5. What is secularism, https://www.secularism.org.uk/what-is-secularism.html.

This article is written by Priyanka Choudhary, currently pursuing BALLB from Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Rajasthan.

LATEST POSTS

ARCHIVES