This article is written by Anushka Singh, a second-year student, pursuing BBA-LLB at Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University. This article analyses the case of Rustom K. Karanjia v. KMD Thackersey (1970), a case of libel (defamation).
This is a case of defamation under tort law. The plaintiff, a businessman alleged that the article published by the defendants has caused harm to his reputation. Here, defendant no. 1 is the editor of the weekly newspaper ‘Blitz’. Defendant no. 2 is a Private Limited Company that owns the newspaper. Defendant no. 3 is the printer of that issue of Blitz and defendant no. 4 is a joint tort-feasor, who was subsequently joined to the suit as it was by his agreement that the article was published.
Appeal No. 20 of 1965 and Suit No. 319 of 1960
Rustom K. Kranjia v. KMD Thakersey AIR 1970 Bom 424
High Court of Bombay-
Justice D.G. Palekar and Justice V.D Tulzapurkar
Decided on 22nd July 1969
Relevant Act/ Section
Libel- under Tort of Defamation
Khrishnaraj Thackersey, a prominent businessman and industrialist of Bombay alleges to have been defamed in his reputation, character and credit by Rustom Karanjia (Journalist) who wrote an article in the weekly issue of the newspaper ‘Blitz’ on 24th September, 1960.
It was further claimed by the plaintiff that the defendant wrote this article with intention of malicious harm towards him and achieved so by publishing false statements. This matter was first heard in a trial court, where the decision was held in favour of the plaintiff. However, the defendants took this matter further, to the Bombay High Court.
Issue Before the Court
- Can the defence of qualified privilege be applied in this case?
- Amount damages are unfair and unreasonable.
This matter was first taken to the Trial Court, where the learned Judge ruled in favour of the plaintiff and denied all the defences of the defendant, in addition, he decreed a full claim of damages of Rs. 3,00,000 along with an injunction.
An appeal was further filed by the defendants in the Bombay High Court. The High Court affirmed the decision of the Trial Court, saying the article was in malice but also partially allowed the appeal by lowering the amount of damages from Rs. 3,00,000 to Rs. 1,50,000.
Decision of the Court
The Court held that the appeal is partially allowed. The decree given by the trial court was confirmed by the Bombay HC, it was passed against defendants 1, 2 and 4. However, a modification to the amount to be paid as damages was made; the amount of 3 lakhs was agreed by the Trial Court which the HC reduced to 1.5 lakhs.
- JOB OPPORTUNITY: Legal Researcher & Content Writer at India Law Offices LLP, New Delhi: Apply Now!
- Call for Papers: International Journal of Cyber Laws, MNLU Mumbai: Submit by May 31, 2021
- 3rd NLS-Trilegal International Arbitration Conference [May 16]: Register by May 15, 2021
- The Specific Weapons Regime under International Humanitarian Law
- Meaning, Nature and Concept of Jurisprudence
- INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY: Online Internship Opportunity at H&A Advocates and Solicitors: Apply Now!
- JOB OPPORTUNITY: Litigation Associate at Mahajan & Mahajan | Advocates & Solicitors New Delhi: Apply Now!
- Rising Insurance Frauds in India and its remedies
- The Fugitive Economic Offenders’ Act, 2018: An Overview
- Let’s Sue and Claim during Pandemic
- PAID INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY, THE DEPARTMENT ODF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS(DEA): APPLY BY 15 May 2021
- 2-DAY WORKSHOP ON “LEGAL RESEARCH WRITING” BY LEGAL FINISHING SCHOOL & JOURNAL FOR LAW STUDENTS AND RESEARCHERS: REGISTER NOW!!
- CLAT-Peeps! (8)
- Conferences and Seminars (72)
- Course and Workshops (42)
- Debates (14)
- Eassy Competitions (24)
- Fellowships & Scholarships (15)
- Guest Blogs (4)
- important (18)
- Internships and Jobs (253)
- interviews (7)
- moot court (41)
- Opportuintes (138)
- opportunity (532)
- other services (1)
- others (1)
- Our Blog (546)
- Administrative Law (10)
- ADR (6)
- Arms Act (1)
- Case Analysis (101)
- Company law (34)
- Constitutional Law (70)
- Consumer Protection Act (5)
- Contract Law (44)
- CPC (6)
- Criminal Law (68)
- Cyber Law (9)
- Environmental Laws (15)
- Evidence Act (17)
- General (77)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- International law (12)
- IPR (2)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- labor laws (1)
- Partnership Act (2)
- personal law (31)
- Taxation (6)
- Tort (52)
- Top Stories (118)
- Uncategorized (217)