ABOUT

WEBIMPACT is an initiave by JLSR, JUS COMMUNE AND LAW COLUMN. It was started to educate law students through webinars.

WEBINAR DETAILS :

TOPIC : Court, Conduct and Contempt

SPEAKER : Jayant Bhatt, Advocate, Supreme Court of India

DATE : 26TH August, 2020

TIMINGS : 4:30 PM

REGISTRATION LINK :

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1K19xeNYs 0-jIDnepvS598igFAkGd59mpv_4sdLWsg/edit

NOTE : CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION FOR ALL WHO REGISTERED AND ATTENDED.

FOR ANY QUERY

Write to us at– communejus@gmail.com jflsrjournal@gmail.com

site.lawportal@gmail.com

WEBSITES :

www.jlsrjournal.in

https://lawcolumn.in/

About the organization:

The Indian Review of Advanced Legal Research (IRALR) is aimed to act as a platform for promoting high-quality legal research and writing on a variety of legal issues among the budding legal minds of India.

Our primary objective is to develop a sense of enthusiasm towards legal research among young law students and provide them with a platform to exhibit their skills in a way that is helpful to the legal fraternity across India. In our endeavour, we will provide a range of opportunities to law students in India to hone their knowledge and legal research skills. We will attempt to host various competitions such as blog/article writing competitions, judgement writing competition and the like to engage students in a range of highly effective activities which will supplement their academics as well as research skills.

About the competition:

The Indian Review of Advanced Legal Research (IRALR) in its endeavor to promote legal writing among law students is hosting the 1st IRALR Article Writing Competition. We hereby highly encourage law students to take part in this competition and get an opportunity for testing their legal writing skills. The students by participating in this competition will get a chance to deliberate and elucidate on various contemporary legal issues along with an opportunity to get cash prizes and other interesting opportunities for internship and publication. This competition will act as an opportunity for all those young and ambitious law students who aspire to sharpen their legal research and writing skills.

Eligibility:

The following categories of persons can participate in the competition:

  1. Any student of a 3-year law programme
    1. Any student of a 5-year integrated law degree programme
    1. Any student pursuing C.A./C.S. (any level)
  1. Any law student studying in post graduate law degree programme (L.L.M.)
    1. Law professionals
  • Theme: Any topic related to law

Prizes:

  1. Winner – Rs. 1500
  2. First Runner-up – Rs. 1000
  3. Second Runner-up – Rs. 500
  4. Top 15 entries will be given a Certificate of Merit.
  5. Top 15 entries will be published on The IRALR Blog.
  6. The authors of selected entries depending upon the quality of writing may be offered an internship at IRALR at the discretion of the Editorial Board
  7. All the participants would be given a certificate of participation.

Formatting Guidelines:

  1. The range should be around 1500-4000 words. (exclusive of the footnotes and abstract).
    1. The author may or may not include an abstract in the article.
    1. Co-authorship up to a maximum of three authors is permitted.
    1. The authors are expected to footnote their sources using any uniform citation method.
    1. The authors are expected to ensure that the text of the submission is in Times New Roman and the size of font is 12 with line spacing of 1.5. For the footnotes, present in the submission, the same shall be in Times New Roman, font size 10 and line spacing of 1.0.
    1. The submission must be made in a word file only (.doc or .docx format). The authors should not disclose their identity to ensure an anonymous review.
    1. The article should be the author’s original work and should not be published previously or not be in consideration for publication elsewhere.

Registration Fees:

  1. Single Author – Rs. 100.
    1. Co-Authorship up to 2 authors – Rs. 150.
    1. Co-Authorship up to 3 authors – Rs. 175.

Registration, Payment and Final Submission Procedure:

Interested students can register themselves and make their submission by following the procedure explained below:

  1. Open https://www.iralr.in/competition to go to the official webpage of the Competition and click on “Register Now” button based on the number of authors (Single Author/ Co-authorship up to 2 authors/ Co-authorship up to 3 authors)
  1. The payment gateway will open where you are required to fill in the specified details and make the payment of the amount as per the number of authors. A receipt of payment will be generated after successful completion of payment.
  1. After making the payment, download the receipt of payment or take a screenshot of the same and send it on competition@iralr.in
  1. After receiving the payment receipt, we will send you the link to the submission portal through mail.
  • Fill in all the details in the submission portal and upload your manuscript on the same in .doc / .docx format only.

Important Deadlines:

  1. Last Date of Registration: 15th September, 2020
  1. Last Date of Submission: 20th September, 2020
    1. Tentative date of declaration of result: 15th October, 2020

Contact info:

For any query mail at editorial@iralr.in only, DO NOT mail at competition@iralr.in for the purpose of queries, the same shall go unanswered.

Official Link :

https://www.iralr.in/competition

About LicitElite

LicitElite, focuses on providing assistance to Law students in self grooming while acquiring better knowledge, by generating an exclusive learning platform through activities like law classes, blog writing, competitions etc. It also aims to connect with legal experts to design better learning opportunities

Topic : International Tribunals and Situation in Middle East

Highlights:
▪️An overview on International Tribunals and their composition.
▪️The latest decision of the Special Tribunal of Lebanon.
▪️What happened in Beirut?
▪️Middle East’s reaction on International Interference.

Venue

WebinarJam on
30th August 2020

7:30pm Indian Standard Time
5:00pm Beirut Time.

About the Speaker

Ms. Sasha Matar
(Social Activist, Lebanon.
Conflict Resolution Coach)

Registration Details:
Registration for the Webinar is FREE.

Note: Certificates will be sent only to the registered participants who will fill out the feedback form at the end of the session.

How to apply

To apply click here:
https://forms.gle/geGnD3mmcJrom4Hh8
or visit us at
https://www.licitelite.com/event-details/webinar-on-international-tribunals-and-situation-in-middle-east

Whatsapp us at: +91 98107 93800
Email-id: admin@licitelite.com

                                                                          -Reported by KARTHI SHANKAR

The Administrative and general supervision committee of Delhi High Court headed by Chief Justice D N Patel, have planned to proceed the Court operations from September 1.

An order has been passed related to the functioning of Delhi High Court where the functioning of the Court has been suspended till 31.03.2020 due to the increase in the spread of the Coronavirus Disease among the people. Other than that all the benches of Delhi High Court may function through Video Conferencing. It is to be noted that earlier the Delhi High Court suspended it’s functioning till August 14.  The pending matters listed from  August 17 to  August 31, before the High Court Of Delhi except the Court of Registrars/Sub-Registrars, were adjourned to the dates from October 9 to October 31. 

The Order also mentioned that “The Court of Registrars & Joint Registrars may take up matters through Video Conferencing. The evidence should be recorded in ex-parte and the uncontested matters are to be tendered by affidavit.” According to the Order, the Courts are said not to pass any adverse orders because of Virtual mode and this will be followed till the Physical functioning of the courts.

The Committee has said that it is planning for physical reopen of the courts from September 1 after the complete availability of Public Transportation throughout the state and also based on situation in Delhi, whether it is advisable or not.

Order issued by Mr.Manoj Jain stated that physical functioning of the courts would resume, where only one-fourth of the court would work, as it would be done on an experimental basis, and the virtual mode would continue as such. The Order also mentioned that a  comprehensive plan will be prepared by the Registrar General and placed before the ‘Committee for Preparation of Graded Action Plan’ and thereafter, before the full Court for consideration.

This article is written by Tulip Das, currently perusing BBA L.L.B(H) from Amity University Kolkata.

INTRODUCTION

“Forgetting it is difficult.

Remembering it is worse.”

Sexual harassment is one of the most committed crimes all over India. Some mentally sick wicked-minded people at the workplace always tend to harass employees working under them. One out of every four women and even men face such a problem at the workplace, irrespective of any profession. Harassing someone sexually is a grievous crime be it face-to-face or virtual. Nowadays, incidences of virtual harassment are vigorously coming up.  Laws are unable to stop this crime. However, the concept of sexual harassment via virtual harassment is being taken seriously.

Sexual Harassment at Workplace

Sexual harassment is an unwelcome sexual advance, unwelcome request for sexual favours or other uncomfortable conduct of a sexual nature which makes a person feel offended, humiliated and intimidated, where a reasonable person would anticipate that reaction in the circumstances.

The Sex Discrimination Act of 1984 defines the nature and the circumstances in which the concept of sexual harassment is unlawful. It is also unlawful for the harassed victim for making or offering to make a charge of sexual harassment to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.

Examples of sexually harassing behaviour include:

  • unwelcome touching;
  • staring or leering;
  • suggestive comments or jokes;
  • sexually explicit pictures or posters;
  • unwanted invitations to go out on dates;
  • requests for sex;
  • intrusive and rude questions about a person’s private life or body;
  • unnecessary familiarity, such as deliberately brushing up against a person;
  • insults or taunts based on sex;
  • sexually explicit physical contact; and
  • sexually explicit emails or SMS text messages.

A working environment or workplace culture that is sexually pervaded or hostile will also amount to unlawful sexual harassment. Some of the circumstances emerging from the case law which may indicate a potentially hostile environment constitute the display of obscene or pornographic materials, general sexual ridicule, crude conversation or innuendo and offensive jokes.

Virtual Harassment  

Virtual harassment can also be termed as cyberbullying or online harassment. This coronavirus pandemic has made work from home a necessity. However, this has brought home more virtual harassment than what used to before this 2020 pandemic. From online hackings to forced pornography to #MeToo Movements, all have been examples of virtual harassment. Although the camera and internet have helped build an informal work environment while smooth working, it has also brought home an old disease that hasn’t been cured yet, i.e., workplace sexual harassment.

This lockdown has not only moved the workplace to homes but in some cases, the harassment as well, say human resource consultants. Since March, when Covid-19 forced the country to stay indoors, it also compelled companies to shift to work from home (WFH) method. But with it have also come a new set of challenges — arise in complaints of virtual harassment.

This COVID-19 pandemic has made work from home a necessity. However, people are still being victims of sexual harassment in this virtual workplace. We often hear instances like an employee showing up shirtless to a virtual meeting with his manager, a woman. Then in another article, I read that, an employee takes screenshots of his female co-worker. Then at another virtual workplace, a manager insists that his colleague, a woman, attend an improvised 11 pm meeting and insists on her turning her video on and then continues to berate her when she refuses. When she finally does, she realises he is intoxicated. Sexual harassment at virtual workplaces are increasing day-by-day. On a regular basis we come across the following types of virtual sexual harassment at workplace: – 

  • Harassing: Repeatedly sending inappropriate, hateful, sexual, and hurtful messages.
  • Outing: Sharing a victim`s secret or personal information in a public forum.
  • Exclusion: Intentionally and publicly excluding a victim from the group and tormenting him/her or them after exclusion.
  • Stalking: Electronically following someone and sending targeted messages with the intention of scaring, harming, or intimidating him or her.

“Home is an extended workplace now,” says Viji Hari, running a Chennai-based HR consultancy firm KelpHR. A survey conducted in the month of March by global research firm Gartner found that 88% of organisations world over have encouraged or required employees to work from home and that nearly 75% plan to move at least 5% of their previously onsite workforce to permanently remote positions post-Covid19, which would mean that it is imperative that companies re-look at what constitutes a workplace and by the expansion of what constitutes workplace harassment. 

The Legal Ways

The Prevention of Sexual Harassment Act (POSH), 2013 defines harassment as ‘any unwelcome, sexually determined physical, verbal, or non-verbal conduct.

Personal and intimate comments on someone’s social media platform, inappropriate emojis and messages, stalking, both physical and virtual, bullying about performance ratings, insisting on having video calls after office work hours, inappropriate or sexist jokes to “lighten” the mood, not maintaining a dress code during video conferences and calls and undefined work hours.

It would also be pertinent to note here that since such an act of sexual harassment happens in cyberspace, i.e. on an electronic platform, an added layer of protection of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) is also extended in this regard.  Section 67 of the IT Act prescribes punitive measures for publishing and/or transmitting obscene content on an electronic platform. Section 67A provides punishment for publishing or transmitting material containing any sexually explicit act, in an electronic form. Such cases of online harassment can also attract penal provisions of Sections 354A, 354D or 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. These provide punishment for a perpetrator who sexually harasses a woman by stalking her on the internet, and through his words or act or gesture intends to insult the modesty of a woman. 

Section 354A of the IPC deals with Sexual harassment and punishment for sexual harassment. It states that – 

  1. A man committing any of the following acts—
  1. physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures; or
  2. a demand or request for sexual favours; or
  3. showing pornography against the will of a woman; or
  4. making sexually coloured remarks, shall be guilty of the offence of sexual harassment.
  1. Any man who commits the offence specified in clause (i) or clause (ii) or clause (iii) of sub-section (1) shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend upto three years, or with fine, or with both.
  2. Any man who commits the offence specified in clause (iv) of sub-section (1) shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend upto one year, or with fine, or with both.

Section 354D of IPC talks about stalking. It says that – 

  1. Any man who—
  1. follows a woman and contacts, or attempts to contact such woman to foster personal interaction repeatedly despite a clear indication of disinterest by such woman; or
  2. monitors the use by a woman of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication,
    commits the offence of stalking

Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that—

  1. it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime and the man accused of stalking had been entrusted with the responsibility of prevention and detection of crime by the State; or
  2. it was pursued under any law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any law; or

(iii)      in the particular circumstances such conduct was reasonable and justified.

  1.  Whoever commits the offence of stalking shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine; and be punished on a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Section 509 of IPC deals with words, gestures or act intending to insult the modesty of a woman. It says that –

Whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object, intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen, by such woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and also with fine.

CASE LAWS 

Workplace sexual harassment in India, was for the very first time recognized by the Supreme Court of India in its landmark judgment of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (“Vishaka Judgment”), wherein the Supreme Court framed certain guidelines and issued directions to the Union of India to enact an appropriate law for combating workplace sexual harassment.

In the absence of a specific law in India, the Supreme Court, in the Vishaka Judgment, laid down certain guidelines making it mandatory for every employer to provide a mechanism to redress grievances pertaining to workplace sexual harassment which were being followed by employers until the enactment of the POSH Act. 

The guidelines led down by the Supreme Court, in this case, are as follows: 

  1. It is the duty of every employer to deliver a sense of security to every woman employee.
  2. The government should make strict laws and regulations to prohibit sexual harassment.
  3. Any act of such nature should result in disciplinary actions and criminal proceedings should also be brought against the wrongdoer.
  4. The organization should have a well set up complaint mechanism for the redressal of the complaints made by the victim and should be subjected to a reasonable time.
  5. This complaint mechanism should be in the form of complaint committee which needs to be headed by a women member and at least 50% of the committee members should be women so that victims do not feel ashamed while communicating their problems. This complaint committee should also have third-party involvement in the form of NGO or other body which is familiar with this issue. There is a need for transparency in the functioning of this committee and for that, there is a requirement of submission of the annual report to the government.
  6. Issues relating to sexual harassment should not be a taboo in the workers meeting and should be discussed positively.
  7. It is the duty of the organisation to aware the female employees about their rights by regularly informing them about the new guidelines issued and legislation passed.
  8. The employer or the person in charge is duty biased to take the necessary and reasonable steps to provide support to the victim if sexual harassment takes place due to the act or omission of the third party.
  9. These guidelines are not limited only to government employers and should also be followed by employers in private sectors.

These guidelines came to be known as the Vishaka Guidelines.

In the case of Saurabh Kumar Mallick v. Comptroller & Auditor General of India, the respondent who was facing departmental inquiry for allegedly indulging in sexual harassment of his senior woman officer contended that he could not be accused of sexual harassment at workplace as the alleged misconduct took place not at the workplace but at an official mess where the woman officer was dwelling. It was also argued that the one who complained was even senior to the respondent and therefore no ‘favour’ could be extracted by the respondent from the complainant and thus the act would not constitute ‘sexual harassment’. The Delhi High Court while considering this matter held this as ‘clearly misconceived’.

CONCLUSION

Information and Communications Technology as a whole has its own advantages but at the same time has the potential to be abused in a way that adversely affects the moral fabric of the society. The crime of sexual harassment in the cyber workspace is one such example of gross misuse of technology and needs to be curbed in an expeditious manner.

The practise of telecommuting has now been adopted in the face of the ongoing pandemic across the globe, including India. Due to the existence of undesirable elements in Indian society, women always face the danger of being subjected to sexual harassment/unwanted sexual advances, especially at the workplace. Despite the protection of POSH Act, the current conditions require a certain widening of its ambit. To quote the noted jurist and academician, Salmond, “The essence of law lies in the spirit, not in its letter, for the letter is significant only as being the external manifestation of the intention that underlies it”.

Sexual harassment at the workplace is highly prevalent in India and there is a need to provide a positive environment to the women workers. The government should make separate laws dealing with this issue. It should also realize that women worker also constitutes a part of the working population in India and it’s the duty of the government to provide them security at work. New strategies should be made by the employers and managers to protect the organisation from this wrongdoing. Government and employers should ensure that women should be treated equally and gender discrimination should not take place at the workplace. Effective implementation of the policies can reduce the manifestation and mutilation of sexual harassment to the minimum. One organisation can modify its approach to handle sexual harassment by viewing other organisations tactic. This will reduce or eliminate glitches caused by this harmful transgression. The government should understand that separate laws may not bring about equality in gender relations but a law dealing with sexual harassment would provide women with immense support in their struggle. At last, we want to say that women should not accept anything as it is because now it’s the time to speak out against all the injustice done to them

Latest Posts


.Archives

This article is written by Harshit Khandelwal, 2nd year Law student currently pursuing BBA-LL.B(Hons.) from Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University . In this article, the author discusses meaning of women empowerment, stages of empowerment, characteristics and much more. LinkedIn Profile – https://www.linkedin.com/in/harshit-khandelwal-8694651ab

Introduction

In general words, empowerment means giving power. As per the International Encyclopedia, power means having the capacity to direct one’s life towards desired social, economic goals and status. Power means control over intellectual resources, ideology, and material assets. Empowerment helps people gain control over their own lives and it is also a multi-dimensional social process. Empowerment takes place within the psychological, sociological and economic spheres at various levels such as group, community and individuals and challenges the assumptions about asymmetrical power relationships, status quo and social dynamics.  

Meaning

There are various ways to define empowerment, but when it comes to women empowerment, it means allowing and accepting women and making them a part of the decision-making process. The word “empowerment” has been largely used with women. For the overall development of the country, women empowerment is the most crucial point which needs to be considered. Empowerment of women is all about allowing and equipping women to make important decisions of life by facing difficult problems in society. 

In development and economics, the empowerment of women has become an important topic of debate. For the sustainable development of the country, it is very essential to achieve gender equality and women empowerment. Even it is argued by many scholars and world leaders that without women empowerment and gender equality sustainable development is not possible. It will not be beneficial to sustainable development if only men’s participation is acknowledged. 

Characteristics of Women Empowerment

1. It provides greater autonomy for women

2. Women Empowerment is making women better off, it is giving power to women

3. It provides a greater degree of self-confidence and a sense of independence

4. It helps women to increase their self-reliance

5. It means giving control to women over intellectual resources, ideology and material assets

6. It gives them power and capacity to resist discrimination imposed upon them by the male dominant society

7. It challenges traditional relations and power equations

8. It means challenging the difficulties faced in life, to overcome inequalities

9. It is a process of capacity building and creating awareness

Need and Importance of Women Empowerment

Empowerment of women and gender equality is something which is globally recognised as a key element to achieving progress in every field. Charter of United Nations which was signed in 1945 was the very first International Agreement which proclaimed gender equality.

a) Earnings

The average earnings of women’s are consistently lower in comparison to those of men.

b) Health

Admissions and attendance stats at hospitals are comparatively lower for women. A very systematic sex bias is reflected in caloric deficiency and higher nutritional among boys as well as girls. It was estimated by the U.N. Development Fund for Women that more than 50% of the women in Africa and Asia are malnourished.

c) Education

The school enrolment stats for girls are still lower than boys at all ages and stages, and the drop out rates for girls are higher from primary to high schools.

Steps in Women Empowerment

The following are the steps to achieve women empowerment-

1. The first step starts at personal level. A woman develops feelings of command, personal power, and self-efficiency over inherent and material choices she has to make.

2. In the second step, at impersonal level empowerment takes place. At this level, one woman influence the decision making power of another woman through working together and their making contacts.

3. In the third step, empowerment emphasis on social change and social action. Through group effort, a community development program develops. Community development can lead to interpersonal empowerment and individual empowerment.

Stages of Women Empowerment

There are three stages of women empowerment according to Sushama Sahay-

1. The first step starts with empowerment only visible when women distance themselves from a particular situation and understand the structure of power and look at them without fear. In this stage, women learn how to analyse the situation and in this way, the fear starts turning into an understanding.

2. In the next stage, women can experience the courage to protest.

3. In the next stage, women develop a more mature stage of life. Confidence is generated by collective support of the group, which develops a learning spirit in themselves.

Strategies of Women Empowerment

The strategy which is adopted empowerment of women is classified into three categories:

1. Economic Approach

This approach is particularly based on the economic interposing is regarded as necessary because of their consequent dependence and low economic status as due to their lack of decision making power.

2. Integrated development approach

It is an assumption that women disempowerment is due to their low economic status, lack of education, low decision-making power and lack of access to resources.

3. Consciousness rising-cum-organising approach

This approach suggests that empowerment can be achieved through awareness building. This disempowerment may result in a complex interplay of cultural, social, historical, political and economic factors.

Ways of Achieving Women Empowerment

Empowerment of women can be achieved through employment, education, women’s organisation, Science and Technology, Information Technology, Law and Agriculture.

a) Employment

Employment is referred to as economic power. It means earning by one’s ability and hard work. Employment whether in business or trade or a job pots constraints on women and gives economic dependence to men. Lack of earning is the main reason why women have to silently endure and tolerate harassment, that’s why they are ill-treated by their husbands.

b) Education

Education plays a very crucial role in empowering women. It not only sustains the empowerment process but also generates momentum in the long run. There are five dimensions within empowerment, every dimension is equally important. Several concepts need to be introduced at proper levels to achieve empowerment through education. When referring to schooling, girls can develop skills and knowledge to encounter stereotypes. Another important way of empowering adult women is distance education.                        

c) Women’s Organisation

The main source of position, power and strength for women in modern India is recognized as Women’s Organization. A woman cannot single-handedly or alone fight against the injustices against them in this male-dominant society. From all the different sections of the society, women’s are brought together to fight against the age-old practices such as polygamy, wife-beating, child-marriages, dowry, etc.

Conclusion

The sole aim of women empowerment is to make them realize their power, identity and potentiality in every sphere of life. Women Empowerment consists of five dimensions, i.e. political, economic, social/cultural, familial and personal. Empowerment of women is possible only when in each dimension a woman has increased access.

Latest Posts


This article is written by Shambhavi Shree, a student of KIIT School of Law, Bhubaneswar (4th year).

INTRODUCTION: DOCTRINE OF SEPERATION OF POWER

Earlier the power was with one single individual ruler because of which the people’s voices were not heard. The process of this undivided rule was referred to as the Monarch system. It was difficult to look after the rights of the individuals or citizens by a single person therefore the powers were separated by the three jurists. The separation of powers was originated by Aristotle, principles were developed and designed by Locke and were propounded by Montesquieu based on the British constitution. The USA was the first country to adopt the separation of power. Article 50 of the Constitution of India states that the state should take necessary steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in all the states of the union. 

  • Separation of power by Wade and Philips states that:
  1. One person cannot be a member of more than one organ of the government.
  2. One organ of the government cannot interfere with the functions of the other.
  3. One organ of the government cannot perform the functions of the other.
  • Concept laid down by Baron-de-Montesquieu 
  • Montesquieu, a French scholar introduced this concept in his book ‘Espirit des Louis’ (The Spirit of Laws) published in 1748 to ensure the liberty and freedom of an individual. And for this, there must be a rule of law and an impartial and independent judiciary.
  • The objective of separation of power was not to interfere in the working of each other. 
  • French jurist, Montesquieu further stated that the separation of powers also includes checks and balances. 
  • If one organ intervenes the function of the other organ is known as checks and balances.
  • There are three main organs of government:
  1. The legislature or primary legislation are entitled to make laws in our country. It is headed by the parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) and the house of representatives.
  2. The executive enforces the law headed by the President, Vice President, and the Cabinet. They act on the advice of the Council of Ministers. The executive is the administrative head of the government.
  3. Judiciary is there to interpret the laws and they are handled by the Supreme Court, High Court, and all other Subordinate Courts. 

ADVANTAGES 

  1. This system was appreciated by English and American jurists and accepted by politicians. 
  2. According to Blackstone if the authority was given to one organ then there was an end of personal liberty.
  3. Separation of power plays a vital role in the creation of a fair government.
  4. Justice and fairness.

DISADVANTAGES 

  1. Historical incongruity implies that King can do no wrong.
  2. Division of functions or division of responsibilities into the legislature, executive, and judiciary to lessen the burden on one single branch.
  3. This system is not acceptable by a large number of countries in the world.
  4. Organic separation of powers.

CASE ANALYSIS

  • Indira Nehru Gandhi V. Raj Narain AIR 1975

In this case, the difference was drawn between the separation of powers in India, the US, and the Australian Constitution. In the Constitution of India separation of powers is not followed strictly whereas in the US and Australian Constitution it is in a strict sense. India has adopted a parliamentary form of government therefore there is no strict separation of powers in India. 

  • In Re The Delhi Laws Act, 1951 AIR 332, 1951 SCR 747

In this case, it has been held that it has nowhere expressly mentioned in our Constitution of India to set up the organs separately as American Constitution. Supreme Court held that separation of powers is the basic structure of our Indian Constitution.

  • Kesvanand Bharti V. State of Kerala and Anr on 24th April, 1973

The Supreme Court stated that both the supremacy of the constitution and separation of powers is part of the basic structure of our Indian Constitution. None of the three separate organs of the republic can take over the functions assigned to the other. This scheme of the constitution cannot be changed even by resorting to Article 368 of the Constitution of India.

  • Ram Jawaya Kapur V. State of Punjab AIR 1955 SC 549

The legislature has to make the law, the executive to implement the law, and the judiciary to interpret the law. Supreme Court held that one organ of the state does not perform the duty of the other.

  • Asif Hameed V. State of J & K AIR 1989 SC 1899

The court stated that legislature, executive, and judiciary is entitled to function in their respective spheres. No organ can perform the function carried out by the other.

CONCLUSION

The development of separation of powers made a tremendous impact on the development of the functioning of the government. Separation of power aimed to grant freedom and not to insert strict separation. The doctrine of separation is accepted in India in its strict sense but complete separation is not possible in our constitution.

REFERENCE

  • https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1814791/
  • http://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-35-doctrine-of-separation-of-powers.html
  • https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers-an-overview.aspx
  • https://indiankanoon.org/doc/257876/
  • http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1617/Separation-of-Powers-and-Its-Development-with-Special-Reference-to-India.html

Latest Posts


Archives

This case analysis is written by Niti Shah studying BLS/LLB from Pravin Gandhi College of  Law, University of Mumbai.

Case Number

28 January 2000

Equivalent Citation

2000- 2 SCC 465

Petitioner

The Chairman, Railway Board & Others.

Respondent

Mrs. Chandrima Das & Others.

Bench

R.P. Sethi, S. Saghir Ahmad

Relevant Act/ Section

Article 226

Brief Facts and Procedural History

Mrs. Chandrima Das who is a practising barrister of the Calcutta High Court filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution against the Chairman, Railway Board; General Manager, Eastern Railway; Divisional Railway Manager, Howrah Division; Chief Commercial Manager, Eastern Railway; State of West Bengal through the Chief Secretary; Home Secretary, Government of West Bengal; Superintendent of Police (Railways), Howrah; Superintendent of Police, Howrah; Director General of Police, West Bengal and many other Officers including the Deputy High Commissioner, Republic of Bangladesh; claiming compensation for the victim, Smt. Hanuffa Khatoon, a Bangladeshi national who was gang-raped by many including employees of the Railways in a room at Yatri Niwas at Howrah Station of the Eastern Railway regarding which G.R.P.S. Case No. 19/98 was registered on 27th February 1998. She arrived at Howrah Railway Station on 26th February 1998 at about 14.00 hours to avail Jodhpur Express at 23.00 Hours. With that intention in mind, she reached Calcutta on 24th February 1998 and stayed at a hotel at 10, Sudder Street, Police Station Taltola, and came to Howrah Station on the date and time aforementioned. She had, however, a waitlisted ticket and so she approached a Train Ticket Examiner at the Station for confirmation of berth against her ticket

Smt. Hanuufa Khatoon lived in Calcutta and was said to wait at Ladies’ waiting room by a Train ticket examiner for confirmation of her ticket. Two men came to her claiming that they are an influential personality of the railway department and confirmed her ticket. After that, again one of those men came and told her to accompany a boy to a restaurant for food. She went for dinner and returned to the ladies’ room again. When 2 another male came to her and asked her to follow her to the resting room which is also called yatri niwas they are which she doubted earlier about them but after getting confirmation by lady attendants, she accompanied them. They took her to the room which was booked by the name of Ashoke Singh where already 3 male attendants were present. Hanufa Khatun suspected something when Ashoke Singh forced her into the room. The four men who were present inside the room brutally raped Hanufa Khatun. When she could recover, she escaped from the room of Yatri Niwas and came back to the platform where again she met Siya Ram Singh and found him talking to Ashoke Singh. Seeing her condition, he pretended to help her and requested to come to his residence to rest for the night with his wife and children and assured her to help to catch the following train as she missed her train while rescuing herself. Thereafter, He took Hanufa Khatoon to a rented flat of his Ashok Singh and raped her. Hearing the voices from the flat landlord of the building rescued her by calling jorabagan police.

Issues before the Court

  • Is Railway liable to pay compensation to Hanuffa Khatoon who was a foreigner?

Argument of Petitioner

  • The first contention made is that the offense has been committed by the person it is an individual act and would not make the Railway or the Union of India liable to pay compensation to the victim of the offense. Since it was the individual act of those persons, they alone would be prosecuted and after being found guilty they would be punished and may also require to pay fine but regarding the facts of this case, the Railways for that matter would not even be vicariously liable.
  • The second contention for claiming damages for the offense on Smt. Hanuffa Khatoon, the remedy for the same lays in the domain of Private Law and not under Public Law, therefore, no compensation could have been legally awarded by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. 
  • The third contention by the counsel on behalf of the appellants, that Hanuffa Khatoon was a foreign national and, therefore, no relief under Public Law could be granted under it as there was no violation of the Fundamental Rights available under the Constitution. It was asserted that the Fundamental Rights in Part III of the Constitution are available only to citizens of this country and since Hanuffa Khatoon was a Bangladeshi national.
  • Hanuffa Khatoon was not the citizen of this country but visited here as a citizen of Bangladesh 
  • The fourth contention by the Learned counsel for the appellants then contended that the Central Govt. cannot be held vicariously liable for the offense of rape committed by the employees of the Railways.

The Argument of Respondent

  • The dispute that Hanuffa Khatoon should have filed her case under the civil court for damages and the issue should not have been considered in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, which is unacceptable.In this case, it is not a matter of violation of an ordinary right of a person but the violation of Fundamental Rights which is involved.Hanuffa Khatoon is a victim of rape. According to precedent, it has been held that non-citizen cannot claim Fundamental Rights under Articles 20, 21, and 22 which are available not only to “citizens” but also to “persons” which would include “non-citizens”.
  • According to this principle, even those who are not citizens of this country and come here merely as tourists or in any other capacity will be entitled to the protection of their lives following the Constitutional provisions. They also have a right to “Life” in this country. they also have the right to live, so long as they are here all the citizens of our country should treat them with human dignity. Just as the State is under an obligation to protect the life of every citizen in this country similarly the State is under an obligation to protect the life of the persons who are not citizen It has already been pointed out above that held that “rape” amounts to a violation of the Fundamental Right guaranteed to a woman under Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • She was entitled to be treated with respect and was also entitled to the protection as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. As a citizen of another country, she had come here with the trust that she will protect even if she is not a citizen and then she cannot be subjected to a treatment which was below dignity. The Right of Article 21 was thus violated.

Judgment

After all the contentions the court says that the operation of Railways is a commercial activity. Establishment of Yatri Niwas at various Railway Stations to provide facilities to passengers on payment of charges is a part of the commercial activity of the Union of India and this activity cannot be compared with the exercise of Sovereign power. The employees who run the Railways and to manage the establishment, including the Railway Stations and Yatri Niwas, are essential components of the Govt. machinery which carry on the commercial activity. Therefore, the appeal having no merit is dismissed with the observation that the amount of compensation shall be made over to the High Commissioner for Bangladesh in India for payment to the victim, Smt. Hanuffa Khatoon. The payment to the High Commissioner shall be made within three months. There will be no order as to costs.

Latest Posts


Archives

This case analysis is Written by Akanksha Chowdhury from Amity University, Kolkata.

Case Number

243

Citation:

1994 SCC (1) 243

Bench

Sahai, R.M. (J)

Decided on

5th November, 1993

Relevant Act/Section

Section 21, 16 and 11 and 2(C) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Brief Facts of the Case

This case is basically vested on one argument whether the Land Development Authorities and Housing come under the ambit of Consumer Protection Act,1986 and also in the amendments which came before 1993. The case was fought in the Supreme Court with an in-depth analysis. The section which was mainly focused in this case was section 2(1)(o) which mentioned about the definition of the consumer and the various other ambits which comes under it. The case was filed by the Development Authority in order to get an answer whether they were included in the definition of the consumer as per mentioned in the section of the act and thus they can claim for the damages of the goods which they had faced from the National Commission depending upon the amount of the damages which they had faced actually. The Plaintiff had suffered immense loss in respect to certain goods and because of which they wanted to approach the commission for the compensation of the damages suffered by them at that time. But they were not allowed to claim for the damages because the contention was made by the defendants that Land Development and Housing do not come under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and also in the amendments that were made before 1993. In this particular case, the court had given a lot of analysis in the definition of the consumers and gave a really fair judgement in order to provide justice to the affected party.

Ratio Decidendi of the Case

This particular case is based on the Principles of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Issues

  1. Whether the rights and powers of the National Commission in order to hold all the statutory authorities is accountable for omissions and also award damages?
  2. Whether there is any liability of the state in the case of torts: Sovereign and Non-Sovereign Functions?
  3. Whether there has to be any compensation given for loss and injury even in the cases which results out of any actions that are authorised by law and are carried out without any negligence made?
  4. Whether the acts which are done in bad faith result in absolute liability on the part of the employee?
  5. Whether the compensation has to be made not only on the basis of the value of the goods but also on the damages for the injustices suffered?

Judgement

The Judgement given by the Court was fair and also provided justice to the plaintiff regarding the damages faced by them. The court had looked into the definition of the consumer and stated that the Land Development Authority and the Housing Sector do come under the definition of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and also, the statutory boards like the State Commission, National Commission and District Commission are actually entitled to entertain the cases of these sectors and the plaintiffs can avail the services like banking, finance etc. The Court also took help from various other important cases which come under this matter. The main motive of the consumer protection act is to provide justice to the consumers who have faced a lot of trouble and thus have a demand for strict compensation so as to get justice soon. Also, it came into notice that the builders, building or construction activities came under the ambit of the new amendments too which were made in the year 1993. The appellants had stated that they provide services to the consumers by providing them houses to stay and with luxurious buildings. But the Supreme Court had clearly rejected this contention and said that services mean any sort of work done for the actual benefit of the consumers and not the construction of the buildings or skyscraper apartments. All such activities were discharged by statutory as well as private authorities. The supreme court while agreeing that the amendment did not have retrospective effect ruled that ‘housing construction’ was added as a matter of abundant caution as housing as a service was already there in the Act prior to the amendment. Likewise, in respect of the inclusion of the clause ‘avail’ in the 1993 amendment, the supreme court ruled that this was added in the Act only to dispel any doubt that a consumer means a person who not only hires but also avails of any facility for consideration. Finally, the court ruled that the Commission had all the rights under the Act to award compensation not only for deficient services but also for harassment and agony caused to a consumer. Citing various case laws, it was held that the State is liable to compensate for loss or injury suffered by a citizen due to arbitrary actions of its functionaries. It is now accepted law that even for bona fide action the State is liable to compensate if that action causes loss or injury to a person. Now there is no distinction between sovereign and non-sovereign functions in determining the liability of the State because under our constitution sovereignty vests in the people. No functionary of the State can claim immunity except to the extent provided in the statute itself. Thus, the supreme court was of the opinion that all public authorities are accountable for their actions. In the end, it was held that the judgement which was given by the Supreme Court had upheld the actual principles as per the RULE OF LAW. By giving the judgement, they provided a serious justice which was needed by the plaintiffs because of the amount of loss that they had suffered. By ordering the Lucknow Development Authority to fix their compensation amount and all other things from the concerned authorities, the court had set up a real good standard. It is the right of the plaintiff to raise their voice whenever they face any injustice and it should not be violated by anyone unless and until there is something serious.

Latest Posts


Archives

The article has been written by Aashika Aggarwal pursuing BBALLB (H) from Amity University, Gurgaon.

Introduction

Prashant Bhushan is an unmistakable social equality legal advisor and is one of the establishing individuals from the AAM AADMI PARTY (AAP). He hails from a family with a history of governmental issues. Bhushan was conceived in 1956 and finishes his investigations in law at the Allahabad University. He is a graduate of IIT Madras and Princeton University. While still an understudy, he composed a book on Indira Gandhi’s political decision in 1974, the case that shook India.

Bhushan’s open activism is notable and he has recorded a few PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION’S (PIL) against human rights issues. He was established in AAP in 2012 with Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and held different portfolios. In 2015, in any case, he had a drop out with Kejriwal sir over his fascism sort of rule and was before long expelled from the gathering alongside another removed AAP pioneer Yogendra Yadav.

Bhushan got assaulted at his chambers in the Supreme Court. Three people reportedly stormed into Mr. Bhushan’s chamber and began beating him while he was in the midst of a TV interview. Mr. Bhushan was slapped and kicked. He fell on the floor, his glasses fell near him, and his shirt was torn before other lawyers rushed to help him. The police had arrested one of the assaulters. The other managed to escape.  Mr. Bhushan had been taken to a clinic for registration. They were stating that have offered a few remarks on Kashmir to which they were taking the complaint. I have said that a choice ought to be held in Kashmir.

Judgment by Supreme Court of India

PIL activist Prashant Bhushan has been found guilty on charges of contempt of court by the Supreme Court of India. The order was passed by a three-judge bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra. The proceedings were initiated suo moto by the court following tweets by the activist on the 22 and 29 of June.

One of his tweets was about the role of the last four Chief Justices of India and the other about the current CJI riding an expensive motorcycle while the court was in lockdown. While Bhushan later expressed some regret, the bench on Friday held that the latter tweet was not against the CJI in his individual capacity but as the head of the Judiciary. It noted that Bhushan not only himself appeared as a lawyer during this period but also challenged the FIR against him. The court refused to accept his tweet as it was written out of anguish.

It dismissed the contention that the tweet was just a matter of feeling, although a few specialists including previous Supreme Court judges have said or composed comparative things. On 11 January 2018, the four then senior-most appointed authorities of the Supreme Court had held a question and answer session to state that the validity of the most elevated legal executive is in question. They attested that the majority rules system would not make due as an autonomous legal executive is the sign of a fruitful vote based system. The Supreme Court had endured such a solid prosecution of itself, and afterward CJI Justice Dipak Mishra. Presently, it has decided not to disregard tweets by an attorney lobbyist. It said that unselfishness can’t be extended to such a degree, they may add up to shortcoming in managing a malignant, profane, determined assault on the very establishment of the organization of legal executive and in this manner harming the very establishment of the majority rules system.

However, as it so happens, it does not appear that Bhushan has always been opposed to the law criminalizing contempt of court. For instance, when former Justice of the Calcutta High Court CS KARNAN was jailed by the Supreme Court on charges of contempt of court, Prashant Bhushan hailed the landmark decision where a sitting High Court Judge was sentenced to imprisonment for the first time.  There are several incidents in the past where Prashant Bhushan had claimed that others had committed the offense of contempt of court. But when the same law was applied against him, he went ahead to challenge the law itself.

Prior, the Supreme Court of India took suo moto against Bhushan’s wild conduct via web-based networking media and started disdain of court body of evidence against him and Twitter India. The summit-court gave a show-cause notice to the senior promoter asking him to clarify for what reason moves ought not to be made against him on the scorn of court charges.

 “We hit Prashant Bhushan hard in his chamber in incomparable court,” a post announced. As he was driven away, the attacker who was captured said that they had gone to converse with Mr. Bhushan about a position he had taken on the Kashmir issue- “We won’t let anybody affront our saints,” he said. The man, who said his name was INDER VERMA, is being addressed at the Tilak Marg Police Headquarters. The other two, TEJINDER SINGH BHULLA and VISHNU GUPTA, are on the loose.

Home Minister P CHIDAMBARAM has censured the assault and sent a delegate to meet Mr. Bhushan at the hospital. He additionally talked about the assault with Delhi Police Commissioner B K Gupta.  Then, the Congress General Secretary Digvijaya Singh guaranteed one of the three men who assaulted Mr. Bhushan was a young laborer for the BJP. The BJP quickly denied the charges.

It rejected the argument that the tweet has not interfered with the administration of justice. It relied on Brahma Prakash Sharma (1953) in which a constitution bench held that it is not necessary to prove affirmatively that there has been actual interference with the administration of justice. The bench also relied on C K DAPHTARY (1971) in which the court had held that we are unable to agree with him that a severe attack on a judge in respect of a judgement or past conduct has no adverse effect on the due administration of justice. This sort of attack in a country like ours has the inevitable effect of undermining the confidence of the public in the Judiciary.