Economic Times Legalworld is hiring intern for its editorial team

Opening – 1
Joining – Immediate
Mode – Work from home
Duration – 6 months
Working hours– 9.30am-6:00pm
5 days working, Saturdays & Sundays are off. 

Responsibilities

– Identify and publish relevant news stories and headlines related to the legal and corporate industry
– Generate and create content for microsites, reports, events and more
– Research on the Legal sector, following and reporting the recent updates on the laws etc
– Following regulatory websites and writing notes on recent developments
– News update on portal and coordination for newsletter
– Research for the legal conferences and summits
– Identifying and contacting senior leaders in the sector as and when required
– Database building, Market Research (Secondary & Primary)
– Social media handling and writing content for different platforms – LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook

Eligibility

1. are from a legal and/or content writing background
2. are immediately available for the internship
3. are available for duration of 6 months

Other requirements

1. Should possess strong research and writing skills

Perks

  • Stipend as per industry standards 
  • Certificate
  • Letter of recommendation

Application process

Kindly mail your resume to c-urja.doshi@timesinternet.in with subject line “Application for Legal Editorial Intern”

Official Notification

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/editor-etlegalworld-7094721a7_internship-economictimes-hiring-activity-6807958400677359616-Snz6/

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

SC will continue to proceed with the hearings concerning children who have lost one or both parents, who have been abandoned or orphaned due to COVID-19.

On 28th May, The bench of Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice Aniruddha Bose had directed all the local authorities of districts to upload the information of children who became orphans or got abandoned by their families due to the ongoing pandemic on ‘Bal Swaraj’ the portal of NCPCR before 29th May. As per the reports of, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, 1742 children have become orphans and 7464 children have lost either of their parents during the pandemic.

On May 29, 2021, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the scheme for these children which is ‘PM Cares for Children”.
According to the available information about the scheme, children who have lost both the parents or surviving parent or legal guardian/ adopted parents during COVID-19 shall be the beneficiaries of aid from the Central Government, but the scheme needs to be worked out. Till now, nobody is aware of how many children will be benefited from the scheme and how it will be implemented. The Centre has been provided some time to apprise about the scheme and execute it.

Today, Supreme Court has passed orders concerning orphaned children and directed authorities:

  • To stop illegal adoption of children orphaned by Covid. Public advertisements for adoptions are unlawful.
  • The state gov. /union territories are directed to prevent any NGO from collecting funds in the names of affected children disclosing their identities and giving them for adoption.
  • Stringent action shall be taken by the state gov. /union territories against agencies or individuals who are involved in the illegal activities related to the adoption of children.
  • No adoption will be allowed of Covid orphaned children according to the provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. No adoption is permitted without the involvement of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA).

Report by Muskan Chanda

About the job

AB InBev India is looking to hire Senior Manager – Legal for its Legal & Compliance Function-based out of Bangalore.

Primary Purpose of the role

Responsible for dispute resolution, work with compliance team on sensitive cases, manage external stakeholders, ensure adherence to new laws and regulations. The role requires to attend and arrange board meetings and ensure legal requirements are fulfilled.

Key Tasks & Accountabilities

  • High stake disputes resolution, working closely with compliance team on sensitive files
  • Route to Market advisory, label registration, engagement of CISPs
  • Management of relationship with external stakeholders, adherence to new laws and regulations
  • Resolving legacy issues in license framework, advising marketing and trade marketing for sustainable Marketing practices, training Sales and working closely with Sales on anti-trust commitment
  • Create the Litigation blueprint roadmap for BU India
  • Management of Legal Budget/ ZBB priorities
  • Compliance of all company-related laws such as the Companies Act, 2013 and all other allied laws that may be applicable to the Company
  • To arrange with and hold meetings of the board and to prepare a correct record of proceedings
  • To attend the board meetings in order to ensure that the legal requirements are fulfilled and provide such information as are necessary
  •  To prepare agenda for board meetings, notice and explanatory statements of General meetings
  • Preparing and maintenance of minutes of directors’ meetings and general meetings
  • Ensuring all statutory forms are filed promptly
  • Interaction with Internal and Statutory Auditors

Required Knowledge, Skills & Attributes

Education & Experience

  • Minimum 5-7 years relevant experience with a multinational AlcoBev company or international consultant firm in India
  • Bachelor degree in related major/ LLB, specialized in Compliance and an international masters in law is desirable

Skills & Knowledge

  • Fluency in English is essential, with exposure to a multinational desirable
  • Strong interpersonal skills and communication skills with an ability to work with all functional and business partners
  • Reliable with a strong sense of integrity and compliance
  • Able to work independently

Personal Attributes

1. High energy

2. Solution-oriented and positive attitude

3. Exceptional customer orientation

4. Fast-mover, quick to adapt

5. Flexibility and resilience in a fast-moving environment

6. Integrity and professionalism

Application Link

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2576440194

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About AIFC Academy of Law

The AIFC Academy of Law provides students and working professionals with internships opportunities and aims to attract and prepare talented law students and graduates from leading universities worldwide, who could contribute to the further development of the AIFC. Students and fresh graduates who are self-motivated, open to new challenges, eager to gain new skills, and acquire unique experience in working with the AIFC are encouraged to apply for our internships. 

Intern Role

Interns will be working in legal teams of the AIFC Authority. Interns supported by the internship coordinators. The scope of work may vary on a day to day basis depending on the project. We will try to tailor the projects of your interests and expertise. There may be an opportunity to work on several projects simultaneously covering different legal issues.

Eligibility:

  • Fluent speaking and written English
  • Completed a minimum of 2 years of an undergraduate law degree; or
  • fresh graduate (undergraduate/ postgraduate); or
  • a newly qualified lawyer.

Location

Work From Home

How to Apply ??

Step 1 Complete the Application Form for the programme.

https://aifckz-my.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/probono_aifc_kz/EY8X5gffrHVEse4bUM5jSqQBg1TQ0zr0yD_BjRfXqf-pJA?rtime=-gDKxF4q2Ug


Step 2 Successful candidates will be announced via email in the 2
and half of June 2021 and will be invited to the online interview.
Step 3 Selected candidates will be contacted by the Internship coordinator to finalize the recruitment process

Official Website

https://aol.aifc.kz/

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

My LAWRD is inviting applications for Research Fellows.
Research Fellows will undertake extensive research on various issues related to technology law and policy. Fellows will engage to understand dynamic developments in the field and involve in producing quality work. The duration of this fellowship is for three months. In light of the CoVID-19 Pandemic, this opportunity will be online and facilitated virtually. Upon successful completion of the fellowship, candidates will be provided with a certificate of completion.

Requirements

  • The Candidates are required to have a good hold over the writing and communication skills
  • Those candidates can apply who are keen to work and understand the Tech Law Space
  • The candidates who want to pursue a career in Technology Law may apply.
  • The candidates should be able to spend at least 3 hours a day towards the association.
  • Students of 4th and 5th year of 5 year LLB course or the students pursuing 3 year LLB course can also apply.

How to apply?

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc7opvDMVvFyX2JVff_sUikGoFzdePMYe0xuTIbFHKCi_RO1Q/viewform

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

This article is written by Shrey Hasija, a first-year law student at Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, GGSIPU, and Swagata Sharma, a second-year law student at National Education Foundation Law College. This article is an overview of  New IT Rules 2021 and why it is controversial.

INTRODUCTION

New Information Technology Rules also known as New IT Rules 2021, introduced by the Ministry of Electronics and Information is secondary legislation that subdues India’s Intermediary Guidelines Rules 2011. On February 25th, 2021, the Government has notified about the IT rules giving social media platforms 3 months to comply.  According to the new rules, all the Social Media handles require to remove unlawful content uploaded in the said social media platform within the time frame provided by a court order or a notice by a government agency. Also, it is now clearly stated that Social Media platforms need to follow the Constitution and Laws of India. They have also introduced Grievance Redressal for the user and appoint a Resident Grievance Officer[i], Chief complying officer, and nodal contact person in their companies.

Reason Behind the Introduction of New Rules

Recent times have witnessed an increase in usages of the digital platform, here the most concerning part about the increase of criminals and anti-national elements through misuse of social media like scams, frauds, cheating, harassment, etc. Another most highlighted issue is related to the OTT platform. Like we always know everything has both positive and negative[ii] sides it is also almost the same in the case of them, many matured content or defamatory content are now witnessed on live streaming which has marked a very negative impact on society. So Ministry of Electronics and Information has to take this step to maintain the positive impact of social media or OTT platforms and decrease the adverse effect.

Benefits of New Regulation

  •   It will lessen the responsibility by reducing from being necessary to be best to achieve the goal.
  •   It will reduce the scope of unlawful content.
  •  It will help in solving the problems faced by the public such as scams, defamation, harassment, etc.
  • It will help the Government to monitor International criminals, offenders (who were living among us) and capture them by encrypting their details.[iii]

Highlights of New Regulation

  • If any person receives a court order from a government agency for their content, they must remove the content from the said social media within the time frame of 36 hours.
  • A grievance officer will be appointed to resolve the complaints within 15 days.
  • Companies will have to barred or remove any sexual act.
  • As soon as the Originator of any unlawful content will be identified he/she will be considered to be anti-national.
  • Social media companies have to set up a grievance redressal mechanism for users/victims.
  • Earlier, if anyone wants to take down any content of social media. He/she has to lodge an F.I.R to Cyber Security Cell and only after then, the content will be taken down. But now, if any individual wants to take any content down that defame or slander him in any way. Can directly address to grievance redressal mechanism of that particular social media and his request will be solved.
  • The social media intermediaries have to do due diligence and if the due diligence is not followed then Safe Harbor Provisions will not apply to them. The safe harbor provisions have been defined under Section 79 of the IT act and protect social media intermediaries by giving them immunity from legal prosecution for any content posted on the platforms [iv]

Why WhatsApp has Sued the Government of India?

Facebook-owned WhatsApp has filed a case in Delhi High Court against the government of India, seeking to block the new Information Technology rules that came into effect on 25 May 2021. According to them, the new rule requires certain social media intermediaries like WhatsApp to trace the origin of the particular message. Also, WhatsApp claimed that requiring the message to ‘trace’ is at par with keeping a fingerprint on every single message sent through their messenger. Which would violate end-to-end encryption[v] offered by them. In which they encrypt every message and call in such a way that even WhatsApp cannot track any messages or the originator of it. WhatsApp in its case also highlighted that ending the encryption mechanism will be unconstitutional and against the people’s fundamental right (Right to Privacy) under case Justice K S Puttaswamy vs Union of India[vi]

What Government has to say About These Allegations

On 29th May, the minister of electronics and information and technology[vii] has clarified the stance of traceability of messages on various social media platforms that have emerged as a lightning rod in the ongoing tussle over the new IT rules. He has given various statements:

  • Social media intermediaries such as WhatsApp will be required to disclose the origin of the particular message only in severe cases to help the government of India to prevent and investigate the various event that will be a threat to national security.
  • India is ensuring the right to privacy to every citizen but at the same time, it is also the responsibility of the government to maintain law and order and to ensure national security.
  • The entire debate on whether the WhatsApp encryption would be maintained or not. he said the right to privacy is ensured via encryption mechanism or by other technology but the right to privacy should be maintained. He also said social media intermediaries to find a technical solution to make both ways happen.

Conclusion

The IT Rules 2021, have the potential to fundamentally change how the internet is used by billions of users across India. Many of the changes are the same as the draft named as Chinese model of online surveillance and censorship but there is also some noticeable improvement that has been taken without public deliberation. In some aspects, it becomes a worse and unconstitutional proposed extension of executive power to regulate online news media and video streaming platforms. The need for regulation is maybe constitutional and advances fundamental rights but this approach has the potential of chilling the voices and hurting the privacy of Indian people.[viii]


[i] https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/new-it-rules-2021

[ii] https://blog.ipleaders.in/impact-it-rules-2021-live-streaming-content-social-media/amp/

[iii] https://community.nasscom.in/communities/policy-advocacy/policy-brief-the-information-technology-intermediary-guidelines-and-digital-media-ethics-code-rules-2021.html

[iv]https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Intermediary_Guidelines_and_Digital_Media_Ethics_Code_Rules-2021.pdf

[v] https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/tech-news-technology/whatsapp-moves-delhi-high-court-over-traceability-clause-social-media-rules-7330558/

[vi] (2017) 10 SCC 1

[vii] https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/union-minister-ravi-shankar-prasad-interview-with-the-hindu/article34743824.ece

[viii] https://thewire.in/tech/explainer-how-the-new-it-rules-take-away-our-digital-rights

Latest Posts


Archives

ABOUT THE ORGANIZERS:

Lexpeeps Pvt. ltd. is an organization that works to assist and help law schools in organizing and managing their events. We’re seeking to provide young and dynamic law students a platform to experience the legal world in their academic capacities. We organize different events where budding lawyers can experience the legal world. With a self-directed educational strategy and the guidance of industry experts, Lexpeeps also provide you with the recent happening in the legal world in the form of news, opportunities where you can find what suits you the best, articles to explore your interests, and many more.

“Lexpeeps Pvt. Ltd. thrives on commitment and creativity”.

About the Competition:

Lexpeeps.in in organized the 1st National PIL Drafting Competition. The competition was open only for law students and legal professionals. This was an online competition.

Mode of Competition:

Online

The topic of PIL: Submit the PIL draft on “Internet shutdown in India”

Results of the Competition and the PIL Drafts

Latest Posts


Archives

This article is written by Vishrut Gupta, a law student from Lloyd Law College. The article aims to explain to the readers about the Mercy Petition which acts as a lifeguard provision for a guilty person.

Introduction

According to the Cambridge dictionary, ‘mercy’ literally means- the act of forgiving someone more specifically when you have some authority. But, as the word enters the periphery of the legal world, it carries a different meaning altogether. When the punishment of a convict is remitted, it is done through a ‘mercy petition’. A mercy petition is an application filed by an accused or a convicted person to the president of the supreme authority requesting to remit/ reduce the death sentence. It is done usually in the case where a miscarriage of justice or suspicious conviction is done. This concept of mercy petition is followed in many countries such as India, the US, UK, Canada, etc. Different countries have distinct authorities to cater this mercy petition as per the provisions of their constitution but mostly it is addressed to the president of a country. In the US and India, mercy petitions are subject to the discretion of the president. If the whole sentence is canceled, it is known as ‘pardon’ and if it is remitted partly after or before sentence, it is known as ‘clemency’ or ‘mercy’.

Legal Provisions

Article 21 of the constitution of India ensures that no person will be deprived of his right to life. Mercy petition following article 21 and article 14, which talks about the right to equality, clearly has some essence of the human sentiments and protects the basic human rights of every prisoner where the convictions are suspicious. Article 72 of the Constitution says that the President shall have the power to grant pardons and reprieves of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence. Similar power is given to the governors under Article 161 of the Constitution. The duration taken by the executive for disposal of mercy petition depends on the nature of the case and the gravity of the crime. It also depends upon the number of mercy petitions submitted to the court. The court, therefore, cannot set a time limit for disposal of even for mercy petitions. But, recently the Home Ministry has brought some essential changes in the laws on the mercy petition.

When Can a Mercy Petition be Filed? 

Mercy petition is the penultimate step for a prisoner. A convicted person cannot directly file a mercy petition. There are several other provisions to provide justice and if they don’t work, the person opts for the last option i.e. the mercy petition. The procedure and the steps involved before filing a mercy petition are:

  • A punishment is usually given by a trial court and if there is a suspicion in the conviction or miscarriage of justice is observed, an appeal can directly be filed in the High Court seeking justice.
  • If High Court does not entertain and dismisses the plea, the convicted person can file a review petition directly in the Supreme Court to seek remission in the sentence. If he faces another rejection, a curative petition helps.
  • Curative petition was first introduced in the case of Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra and Anr. (2002). It works on the Latin maxim- “actus curiae neminem gravity” meaning that the court shall not be prejudice in its actions. The main objective is to prevent the abuse of power in due process and eliminating the miscarriage of justice. It is supported by Article 137 mentioned in the constitution of India.
  • If the curative petition also fails, the last resort of mercy petition opts which might help the convict or prisoner. 

Layers Through Which the Mercy Petition Passes

The petition is filed and submitted by the prisoner or his relative to the governor or president depending upon the case. It is then received by the Secretariat of the President. The Secretariat sends it further to the Ministry of Home Affairs for their recommendation. The Home Ministry discusses it with the concerned state and checks the details such as the background of the criminal and the gravity of the crime. The Ministry after consulting with the state prepares a report with suggestions and sends it back to the President. The President after going through everything grants the pardon/remission or dismisses the plea depending upon the facts and need of the situation. This is a very time taking process and sometimes it takes years.

Powers of President

  • Pardon: To cancel the whole sentence and conviction of the prisoner.
  • Remission: The nature of the sentence remains the same with the reduction in the punishment like decreasing the number of years of rigorous punishment.
  • Respite: Certain special situations lead to the change in the punishment such as critical health issues to the prisoner.
  • Reprive: The execution is delayed for some time to provide the guilty person the time to prove his innocence.
  • Commute: The nature of the punishment is changed to decrease the harshness of punishment like converting the rigorous sentence into simple.

Shabnam v. State of UP Classic Case

Shabnam, a postgraduate and holding the post of the government school teacher, along with Saleem, killed all the 7 members of her family including a 10 months-old infant. She was sentenced to death by the Amroha Court which was upheld by Allahabad High Court in 2013 and also the Supreme Court in 2015. While in jail, she gave birth to a child. She filed two mercy petitions citing the reason as for the care of her child, first to the then-governor Ram Naik and then president Pranab Mukherjee but both the petitions were rejected. It was being argued that the convict has the Right to Life under the provisions of Article 21 but the judge dismissed the plea by saying that the family members also had the same rights. The apex court laid down the following observations:

  • The accused must be provided with prior notice and the accused along with its lawyer must be present during the proceedings of the case.
  • The death warrant of the convict must prescribe the exact date and time of the execution instead of a range of dates.
  • There must be a reasonable gap between the date of issuing the warrant and the execution date of the sentence so that the convict gets a reasonable time to seek legal remedies and meet his family. 
  • The convict should be given a copy of the warrant.
  • Legal aid must be given to the convict during these proceedings. 

Mercy Petition: Boon or Bane

Mercy petitions are essentially required everywhere because it is one of those few provisions which ensure the convict a second chance and the right to live which is not only a fundamental right under article 21 of the Indian Constitution but also a human right that cannot be denied. It is acting as a boon in the judicial skeleton. It helps in eliminating the situation where the ignorance of the judiciary results in injustice to the convict leading him to go through trauma and ill-health. In cases where the miscarriage of justice is seen, a mercy petition cures the damage done. Sometimes, it is also said that the mercy plea after crossing several chains lands in the periphery of politics, and recommendations by the ministry are not genuine and the best for the prisoner thereby failing the purpose of the mercy. Time is another crucial aspect in the mercy petition’s disposal. But at the same time, the procedural discrepancies result to delay injustice. This can be seen in the Nirbhaya case where the convicts were hanged after 7 years. So, we can say that the mercy petition acts as both a boon and bane. There is an urgent need to formulate laws specifying the time limit to dispose of with the mercy petitions for quick justice because- Justice delayed is justice denied”

Latest Posts


Archives

This case brief is written by Sanskriti Goel, a 1st year law student from Chanderprabhu Jain College of Higher Studies and School of law, GGSIPU.

Citation

(1913) 11 ALJ 489

Relevant Act/Sections

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 :

Section 2(a):  When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, to obtain the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.

Section 2(b): When a person to whom the proposal is made, signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise.

Section 2(d): When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing, something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.

Section 8: Performance of the conditions of a proposal, or the acceptance of any consideration for a reciprocal promise which may be offered with a proposal, is an acceptance of the proposal.

Brief Facts

  • The nephew of the defendant had absconded from home. He was nowhere to be found. The defendant sent his servants to various places in search of his nephew.
  • The plaintiff was one of the servants of the defendant and he was sent to Haridwar in search of the boy. He was given money for his travel fare and other expenses.
  • While the search for the boy was still going on, the defendant issued handbills offering a reward of ₹501 to anyone who might find his nephew and bring the boy back home.
  • The plaintiff succeeded in tracing the boy and brought him back to the defendant. As the plaintiff was unaware of the reward offered, he did not ask for it and continued working for the defendant.
  • After about 6 months, due to some disputes, the defendant dismissed the plaintiff from the job.
  • Afterward, the plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant claiming the reward of ₹501 that was due to him.

Contentions of the Parties

Plaintiff

The plaintiff contended that the very performance of the task assigned to him was sufficient consideration for the defendant’s promise since the plaintiff had successfully traced the boy and brought him back home and thus fulfilling the defendant’s conditions.

He affirmed that neither motive nor knowledge of the offer was not essential and hence, he was entitled to the reward.

Defendant

The defendant argued that there was no contract between the parties as there was no acceptance of the offer.

He also argued that the plaintiff, being his servant, was under an obligation to perform the task assigned to him, and therefore, such performance cannot be regarded as  sufficient consideration for the defendant’s promise.

Legal Issues

  • Was there a valid acceptance to constitute a legally binding contract?
  • Was the plaintiff entitled to the reward that was offered by the defendant for tracing the boy?
  • Did tracing of the boy by the plaintiff can be regarded as sufficient consideration for the defendant’s promise?

Ratio of the Case

In the case of Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt, it was held that there can be no acceptance unless there is knowledge of the offer.

Although in the present case, the offer was a general offer where merely fulfilling the conditions of the offer itself is treated as an acceptance to create a contract but, fulfilling the conditions under the present case cannot be regarded as acceptance of the offer due to lack of knowledge of the offer.

Decision of the Allahabad High Court

The High Court observed that “A suit like the present can only be found on a contract. To constitute a contract, there must be an acceptance of the offer and there can be no acceptance unless there is knowledge of the offer. Motive is not essential but knowledge and intention are. Moreover, there was already a subsisting and therefore, the performance of the act cannot be regarded as a consideration for the defendant’s promise.”

Consequently, the suit was dismissed and the defendant was held not liable to pay the reward to the plaintiff.

Latest Posts


Archives

About NLIU, Bhopal:

The National Law Institute University, Bhopal (NLIU), was established by the Rashtriya Vidhi Sansthan Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, by an Act No. 41 of 1997 enacted by the Madhya Pradesh State Legislature. NLIU is recognized by the University Grants Commission and the Bar Council of India.

About the Job Opportunity:

National Law Institute University, Bhopal has invited applications for the post of Professor (2 posts), Associate Professor (5 posts) and Assistant Professor (7 posts).

Details regarding eligibility/qualifications and mode of application are available at

https://www.nliu.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Website-Notification-for-June-2021.pdf

Last date to apply?

30 June 2021

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/