About the job

A legal firm in Pune is inviting applications for Legal Interns

Requirements:-
• Basic to Intermediate knowledge about Drafting Legal and Commercial Contracts, Employment Agreements and Corporate law.
• Having interest in Litigation and court appearances
• Basic knowledge of Cyber laws and IPR
• Proficient in English and communication skills
• Technologically well aware and having some experience at Email writing and formal communication with Clients
• Confident personality and good people management skills

No fixed time restrictions, In-person presence not mandatory for next couple of months, Law students preferred.

Preferably based in Pune

Stipend:

3k-5k

How to Apply?

Send your Resumes at :- Office@ranelegal.com

Official Notification:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2596449466/?alertAction=markasviewed&savedSearchAuthToken=1%26AQE7TsvcVrmekQAAAXoDicICB4527AYWhuIDeQNWyWP6lljUsB4Mdkw5cPPzVa_jSHqBrjUgbQbl4MbUA_02rhFhhiRlpuaG8ORJhJHwNnUUSTTuvULdx_rNzTw7-CzU35WqfqCH4nexlPwjHK4PMzq9zuqX3JgN0lhJMdiBXkoHXkGgVMYo43TpDWpvUnPF4LVQbtDubCyLwCD5ebQeNYIP4IcOGJgYzX7epuAIAtYaMgHq8gIB_T4-Ipy7ynsL3poo4GPoHV04i3TfaMfixM8S84-E25D2pmuYfXDO9nP99J8T6Ip69mX0%26ARbsNdoOcglpce3DI4TnR4uVhN4O&savedSearchId=1422822506&refId=acc1a5cd-9e34-4e2c-858d-37dee031232b&trackingId=9NEp1%2BiHJvXnBx%2FH4bThPw%3D%3D&midToken=AQFTUldLymjkcQ&midSig=2gBUA9KN1jV9M1&trk=eml-email_job_alert_digest_01-job_alert-7-member_details_mercado&trkEmail=eml-email_job_alert_digest_01-job_alert-7-member_details_mercado-null-d83xhd%7Ekpuntxmt%7Ekv-null-jobs%7Eview

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BQ3gYzs6H9Z5SoRYq718zN

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About the job

Role and Responsibility:

  • Prioritizing and communicating daily activities.
  • Legal document preparation and record-keeping.
  • Proofread documents for spelling and grammar.
  • Drafting papers and settlements.
  • Travel to different cities to meet lawyers.
  • Deal with external parties (regulators, external counsel, politicians, and clients).
  • Provide expert and strategic legal advise to management.
  • Draft agreements that minimize risks and maximize legal rights.
  • Deal with complex, significant matters that cut across legal and related areas.
  • Draft agreements that minimize risks and maximize legal rights.
  • Deal with complex, significant matters that cut across legal and related areas.
  • To coordinate, follow-up and monitor the progress of the cases pending in various courts of law across the country in consultation with the Council’s legal representatives.
  • Taking a lead role, especially during meetings, hearings, etc., and prioritizing work to ensure that the services delivered to the Council are of high quality.

Must-Have:

  •    Minimum 1 year of experience in the legal profession.
  • College Law Degree or Certificates preferred.
  • Experience in Drafting, Reviewing and Revising Agreements in Corporate Sectors.
  •    Should have knowledge of writing proposals.
  •    Excellent written and verbal communication skills.
  •    Are flexible and have a keen eye for detail in your work.
  •    Basic knowledge of corporate documents. (preferred)
  • Experience in drafting and negotiating Notices.

Official Notification:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2590190143/?alertAction=markasviewed&savedSearchAuthToken=1%26AQE7TsvcVrmekQAAAXoDicICB4527AYWhuIDeQNWyWP6lljUsB4Mdkw5cPPzVa_jSHqBrjUgbQbl4MbUA_02rhFhhiRlpuaG8ORJhJHwNnUUSTTuvULdx_rNzTw7-CzU35WqfqCH4nexlPwjHK4PMzq9zuqX3JgN0lhJMdiBXkoHXkGgVMYo43TpDWpvUnPF4LVQbtDubCyLwCD5ebQeNYIP4IcOGJgYzX7epuAIAtYaMgHq8gIB_T4-Ipy7ynsL3poo4GPoHV04i3TfaMfixM8S84-E25D2pmuYfXDO9nP99J8T6Ip69mX0%26ARbsNdoOcglpce3DI4TnR4uVhN4O&savedSearchId=1422822506&refId=acc1a5cd-9e34-4e2c-858d-37dee031232b&trackingId=L1RyyOfHtJp9zeAaA1P7%2Bg%3D%3D&midToken=AQFTUldLymjkcQ&midSig=2gBUA9KN1jV9M1&trk=eml-email_job_alert_digest_01-job_alert-8-member_details_mercado&trkEmail=eml-email_job_alert_digest_01-job_alert-8-member_details_mercado-null-d83xhd%7Ekpuntxmt%7Ekv-null-jobs%7Eview

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BQ3gYzs6H9Z5SoRYq718zN

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Applications are invited for the Lok Sabha Internship Programme viz., Lok
Sabha Training Programme on Innovation, Research and Development (LSTPIRD) from Indian citizens between 18 to 25 years of age and possessing Graduation/Post graduation in any discipline such as social science and environment, International Relations, Law, Journalism, Finance, Management, Languages, etc. from recognized Institutes in India or Abroad as on 9 June 2021. The applicant having work experience in any field viz., research, counseling, management, marketing, computers and related fields will be given preference. Further, the candidates who are pursuing professional courses and have passed first year of their 4/5 years professional course, may also apply for the Internship Programme. The selected candidates may opt for the duration of the Internship from 1 month to 11 months.

Application Deadline:

The last date for receipt of the application is 25 June 2021.

Stipend:

The Interns shall be paid an amount of Rs. 25,000/- per month during the Internship period.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may submit their application in the prescribed format (as in the official notification Annexure) on the email ID at email pride.internship@sansad.nic.in or send a hard copy to PRIDE, Room No. G-083, Ground Floor, PLB, New Delhi with all relevant documents.

The selected candidates will be intimated by email. No correspondence in this regard will be entertained.

Official Notification:

http://bpst.nic.in/LSTPRID_Advertisement_2_2021.pdf

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BQ3gYzs6H9Z5SoRYq718zN

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

SANSADIYA:

With changing learning patterns, the participation of Students in Legislative Policy Framework has risen. Bills are often put into the public forum for discussions and suggestions. Students in course of their Internship are assisting Members of Parliament on issues which are put forth for discussion in Parliament.

Think India, through SANSADIYA aims at creating a similar learning platform for student community through Internship with Members of Parliament and Ministers for One-Month and assist them with issues like Analysis of Bill, Drafting Questions. Internship given to more than 75+ Students across the Nation from Premier Institutions and National Universities.

INTERNSHIP DETAILS

The primary role of this Internship is to provide in depth research support to her/his allotted MP for their parliamentary and constituency related work.

Also, includes drafting parliamentary questions to assist the MP, preparing the questions for zero hour debates, raising matters of public importance, drafting private members’ bills etc.

When Parliament is not in session, the Interns engage with policy makers, experts from various think-tanks, academicians from leading universities, and leaders from diverse public policy institutions through participation in workshops on important policy and development issues. This internship envisages providing the Students policy research and related issues.

Official Notification:

https://www.thinkindiaorg.in/Sansadiya.php

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/BQ3gYzs6H9Z5SoRYq718zN

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

-Report by Anuj Dhar

The Supreme Court of India on Thursday quashed the case against Dua for his alleged comments against Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his YouTube show. A bench consisting of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit and Vineet Saran decided to rescind FIR No.0053 and free the petitioner of charges.

Key Highlights

  • Vinod Dua, the petitioner, is an Indian journalist and also has a show on YouTube namely The Vinod Dua show.
  • On 30th March 2020, the petitioner made hurtful allegations against the government and stated unfounded facts against the Prime Minister of India.
  • On 6th May 2020, FIR No.0053 was filed by a BJP leader against the petitioner which pointedly referred to two segments in the talk show and generally dealt with the number of allegations made by the petitioner in said talk show to submit that the actions on part of the petitioner amounted to offences punishable under penal provisions referred to in the FIR.
  • After the review of the FIR, it was decided that the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with the present crime. However, the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the Police force through Video Conferencing or Online mode.
  • On June 14th, 2020, the Supreme Court held a special sitting to take up a writ petition by Vinod Dua to quash the FIR lodged against him by a BJP leader in Shimla.

Contentions of the Petitioner

Being a renowned journalist, the petitioner was entitled to and did nothing more than critical analysis of the functioning and the actions of the Government.

  • He was touching upon issues of great concern so that adequate attention could be given to the prevailing problems.
  • The petitioner did his duty to bring forward the dispassionate and critical appraisal of the Government. Dua’s actions were covered by Explanations 2 and 3 of Section 124A, IPC3, and exception to Section 505 IPC3 and were within his Right of Free Speech and Expression guaranteed under Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution of India.
  • No FIR should be registered against a person belonging to media with at least 10 years of standing unless cleared by the Committee as suggested.

Contentions of the Respondent

Mr. Vinod Dua is spreading fake and malicious news by stating that the Prime Minister has garnered votes through acts of terrorism. This directly amounts to inciting violence amongst the citizens and will further disturb public tranquility. This is an act of instigating violence against the government of India and the Prime Minister. Whoever makes or circulates false claims, alarms, or warnings relating to a disaster or its severity or magnitude, leading to the panic of the citizens of the country, shall on conviction, will be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to 1 year or with fine.

The Decision by the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India on Thursday quashed the case against Dua for his alleged comments against Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his YouTube show, saying a verdict of the year 1962, namely Kedar Nath Singh, entitles every journalist to protection. The prayer that no FIR be registered against a person belonging to media with at least 10 years of standing unless cleared by the Committee was rejected by the Supreme Court. Writ Petition was allowed to the aforesaid extent and FIR No.0053 dated 06.05.2020 registered at Police Station Kumarsain, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh was quashed.

Relevant Sections

  • Indian Penal Code,1860 – Section 124A, 268, 501 and 505
  • Disaster Management Act – Section 52, 54.
  • Article 32 in The Constitution of India 1949
  • Article 19(1)(a) in The Constitution of India 1949

This article is written by Priyanka Choudhary, currently pursuing BALLB from Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Rajasthan. This article deals with the comparison of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 of India in contrast with the USA, UK, and Canada Juvenile Justice System.

INTRODUCTION

To replace the Juvenile Delinquency Law and therefore the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act) of 2000, The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was introduced and passed in Parliament in 2015. One of the main provisions of the new Act was that it treated the juveniles of the age group of 16-18 years as adults who were in conflict with the law and allowed their trials, in cases where the crimes were to be determined. It is determined by a Juvenile Justice Board, that what should be the nature of the crime and whether the juvenile should be tried as a minor or a child. This provision received a push after the 2012 Nirbhaya gangrape case in which one of the accused was just short of 18 years, and was therefore tried as a juvenile.

How does Juvenile Justice Work in India

“The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015”, defines the process or the legal framework in which juveniles between the age of 16 to 18 years in India, can appear before a judge.

USA Juvenile Justice System  

The American Juvenile Justice System is the primary method to handle minors who are below 18 years and have committed criminal offenses or crimes. The federal “Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act” (JJDPA) which was established in 1974 and last reauthorized in 2002, provides crucial support to the state programs that assist communities to take a comprehensive approach to prevent the crimes or offenses done by juveniles and to quickly and effectively address the needs of vulnerable youth and their families. 

UK Juvenile Justice System

“The Youth Justice System in England and Wales” provides for the processes that are used to prosecute, convict and punish the ones who are below the age of 18 years and who have committed criminal crimes or offenses. The main aim of the Youth Justice System is to prevent the children and young people from committing the crime. 

Canada Juvenile Justice System

“The Youth Criminal Justice Act” (YCJA) of Canada provides for the rights of young people from the age of 12 to 17 years and who are being charged with a crime or offense. A child under 12 years of age cannot be charged with a crime and a person of 18 years of age is considered an adult in the court. 

Comparative Analysis with the Laws of USA, UK and Canada

  • The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, governs the Indian Juvenile System.
  • The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA), 1974, governs the American Juvenile Justice System.
  • The Youth Justice System in England and Wales, governs the UK Juvenile Justice System.
  • The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), governs the Canadian Juvenile Justice System.

Criminal Responsibility

  1. India: In India, the law defines a juvenile as a person who is under the age of 16, according to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
  2. United States of America: In USA, some of the state statutes allow for juveniles as young as age 7 years old to be held responsible for some law violations.
  3. United Kingdom: In UK, the ones who are below the age of 18 years and have committed criminal crimes or offenses, can be prosecuted, convicted, and punished.
  4. Canada: A child under 12 years of age cannot be charged with a crime and a person of 18 years of age is considered an adult in the court. So between the age of 12 to 17 a juvenile can be charged with a crime or offense.

Judicial Process

  1. India: Under this Act, children are not to be taken to a regular criminal court. The main aim of a separate court is socio-legal rehabilitation and reformation, not punishment. The aim is to hold a child culpable for their criminal activity, not through punishment, but by counseling the child to understand their actions and persuade them away from criminal activities in the future. The Juvenile Justice Act consists of a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the first class and two social workers, at least one of whom must be a woman. Juvenile Justice Act is meant to resolve cases within four months.
  2. USA: Youth courts are programs in which youth punish their peers for petty offender and status crimes and other problem behaviors. The primary function of most youth court programs is to determine a fair and restorative sentence or disposition for the youth respondent.
  3. UK: When a young person commits a grave crime or offense, they can be sent to the youth court. Other than murder and manslaughter, youth courts deal with all serious crimes committed by young persons. The process depends on the age of the child or young person: Most young people in the Youth Court are between the age of 14-17 years old, however, 12 and 13-year-olds are included if they are charged with particularly serious offenses. But after the 1st of July of 2019, the Youth Court started including 17-year-olds who have been charged with an offense. If the charge is particularly serious then the young person would have to appear firstly in the youth court and then the case will be transferred to the District Court.
  4. Canada: Special considerations are taken when young people commit criminal acts. The YCJA applies to children between the age of 12 to 17 years, who get into trouble with the law. The YCJA says that young individuals should be held accountable for their criminal acts, although not in the same way or to the same extent as adults. It is in society’s interest to ensure that as many young offenders as possible should be rehabilitated and become productive members of society in the future. However, in most cases, judges impose one of the youth sentencing options in the YCJA. Moreover, in very serious cases, the court does have the power to impose an adult sentence. However, if an adult sentence is imposed on the young person, then the Criminal Code penalties applied to the adult offenders will be applied to them. This can include mandatory minimum penalties and sentences up to life imprisonment. However, a young person cannot serve any part of a sentence in an adult prison before the age of 18.

CONCLUSION

The JJ Act of 2015 is modern and progressive legislation that intends to bring change and restore the juveniles, this legislation brings forth a whole set of guidelines that are also open to abuse. While undertaking the work of comparison between all the four legislations of the countries many different things were found out. 

Latest Posts


Archive

Asaram Bapu who has been sentenced to life imprisonment for raping a teenage girl in his ashram has now recently filed a bail application in Supreme Court. After getting to know this the victim’s father has moved to Supreme Court, opposing the bail plea of Asaram Bapu.

The rape victim’s father state’s that Asaram Bapu will organize revenge killing of him, his families, and eyewitnesses if bail is been granted. He submitted that the petitioner is highly influential and has a political connection and also millions of blind followers. Many eyewitnesses have already been attacked in the past by the accused and recently the applicant himself has been threatened by Asaram Bapu’s connection. And in case bail is granted to him then it is likely that he and his family will be attacked and also he has hired Kartik Haldar who killed and attacked an eyewitness who confessed to the police.

The motive of the accused is evident by various moves of the accused such as recently the petitioner has been attempting to change the venue of his custody; the accused is also deliberately delaying the pending trial at Gandhi Nagar and Jodhpur even though he is stable and fit. Rajasthan government has also told the top court that Asaram Bapu is fit and stable but trying to change the venue of his custody deliberately.

-Report by Riddhi Dubey

On Thursday Bombay High Court said that doctors cannot be held liable for unavailability of drugs and short supply of medicines. In the last few months of the pandemic, we have come across numerous cases filed against doctors and hospitals. Various allegations have been made on doctors by the covid patience and their family members.

The division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Duttta and Justice Kulkarni while hearing a clutch of PlLs filed relating to Covid management in the state and asked Advocate General Ashutosh kumbhakoni to look into the issue. The doctors are alleged for not giving proper drugs or using the cheaper alternative drugs for covid patience and making money out of it. Replying to which Indian Medical Association stated that Tocilizumab and Dexamethasone have different uses. Patients who don’t respond to the anti-inflammatory action of Dexamethasone usually react to Tocilizumab. In a life-threatening situation, where Daxemathasine doesn’t help, only then Tocilizumab is prescribed. Latter it all depends upon how the patient’s body how it responds to the medication as it always differs from person to person. And it will be wrong to say that doctors are using it indiscriminately and making money out of it. Doctors are been often blamed by relatives for the death of covid patients, often go to the police station and complaint that the application protocols are not been followed by doctors which have led to their relative’s death.

Therefore, a Request was been made in court to issue proper guidelines to the police station that to deal in such matters and how to investigate such matters. On which bench stated that the patient’s treatment procedure is known best to doctors and should be left up to them. Considering the patient’s clinical condition, what drugs are required at a particular point in time is best known to medical experts only, as observed by the court. Court also stated that it will still consider cases that it feels are genuine and needs proper investigation by the investigating officer, but doctors can’t be harassed and be alleged for medical negligence. As in this critical time of the pandemic, the doctors and healthcare staff are “in the frontline and working tirelessly for the wellbeing of the society”.

-Report by Riddhi Dubey

This article is written by SANJANA SUMAN, a student of Amity Law School, Amity University Jharkhand Ranchi.

INTRODUCTION

India one of the biggest stock exchanges in the world its own Bombay stock exchange. One of the biggest and most complex stock exchanges in the entire world but before 1992 the main problem with the Indian stock market is a dematerialization demutualization of documents. Harshad Mehta one of the middle-class boys who become a millionaire in just some year. But, though, he is a good man, there is always a coin that has two sides, and he followed a negative approach. He enjoys a loophole in the system of India.

The scam was the biggest money market scam ever perpetrated in India, with an estimated value of Rs. 4000 crore. Harshad Mehta, a stock and money market broker, was the principal perpetrator of the fraud. It was a systematic stock fraud involving bank receipts and stamp paper that caused the Indian stock market to crash after he saved India from bankruptcy. The scam exposed the underlying flaws in Indian financial institutions, leading to a completely overhauled stock-trading system that included the use of online security technologies.

The idea of diverting cash from the banking system to various stockholders or brokers is referred to as security fraud. Mehta conducted a systematic fraud in the Indian stock market in 1992, causing the entire securities system to collapse. He defrauded the banking system of almost $1 billion to acquire equities on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The entire exchange system suffered as a result of this, as the security system crumbled and investors lost thousands of rupees in the exchange system. The scale of the fraud was so vast that the stock market’s net value exceeded India’s health and education budgets.  Mehta secured securities from the State Bank of India against fraudulent cheques signed by corrupt officials and failed to deliver the securities, according to the scheme. Mehta used fake methods to inflate stock values and then sold the equities he owned in these companies. The fraud had a wide range of ramifications, including the loss of money for thousands of families and an instantaneous stock market drop. The index dropped from 4500 to 2500, resulting in a market capitalization loss of Rs.1000 billion.  The 1992 fraud generated a slew of suspicions about bank employees who may have colluded with Mehta. Many high bank officials were implicated, according to Montek Singh Ahluwalia (Secretary, Economic Affairs at the Ministry of Finance).

Stamp Paper Scam

Banks in India were not permitted to invest in the equity markets until the early 1990s. They were, however, expected to make a profit and keep a specific percentage of their assets in government fixed-income bonds (a “threshold”). To meet the banks’ capital requirements, Mehta drained capital from the banking system and invested it in the stock market. He promised the banks higher interest rates in exchange for transferring the funds to his personal account, ostensibly to acquire securities for them from other banks. To buy securities and forward bonds from other banks, a bank had to go through a broker at the time.  Mehta utilized the money in his account to buy stocks, substantially increase demand for particular stocks (such as ACC, Sterlite Industries, and Videocon), sell them, provide a portion of the proceeds to the bank, and pocket the rest for himself. As a result, companies like ACC, which was trading for ₹200 a share in 1991, skyrocketed to nearly ₹9,000 in just three months. 

Bank Receipt Scam

The bank receipt was another important tool (BR). Securities were not actually exchanged back and forth in a straight forward deal. Instead, the borrower, or seller of securities, issued a BR to the buyer of securities. The BR acts as a receipt from the selling bank, as well as a guarantee that the buyer will receive the securities for which they paid at the conclusion of the period. Mehta wanted banks that could issue false BRs, or BRs that were not backed by any government securities after he figured this out.

After the bogus BRs were issued, they were forwarded on to other banks, which then loaned money to Mehta, ostensibly because they thought they were lending against government securities when they weren’t.  He increased the cost of ACC from ₹200 to ₹9,000. That was a 4,400 percent rise. Because he had to book profits in the end, the markets fell on the day he sold. 

Ready Forward Deal Scam

The ready forward trade is a method of liaising between two banks through a single broker. A bank seeks a broker when it wants to sell securities. This broker attempts to sell assets at another bank, and vice versa for purchases. Because Mehta was a well-known broker, he had checks written in his name rather than the banks. When the bank demanded payment for the securities, he went to another bank and repeated the process, this time investing the bank’s funds in the stock market. Mehta took the ready-forward deal and applied it to the Indian banking system’s Bank Receipts mechanism. After the 1992 swindle, the Janakiraman Committee overhauled the whole Bank Receipts system, which was the most defective system. 

To obtain unsecured loans, Mehta used fake BRs and exploited multiple tiny banks to issue BRs on demand. Because they were small banks, Mehta could keep the receipts for as long as he wished. Cheques in favor of both banks were credited to the brokers’ accounts, one of which was Mehta’s. As a result, banks invested heavily into BOK and MCB, which both showed signs of expansion. Mehta used the BR fraud to raise the price of ACC from ₹200 to ₹900 in a short period of time. This 4400 percent surge was seen in several other equities, and the market fell when he sold them.

This continued on for as long as the stock prices rose, and no one knew what Mehta was up to. However, as the scam was revealed, several institutions were left with worthless BRs – the financial system had been defrauded of a huge 4,000 crore (equal to 250 billion or US$3.5 billion in 2019). He was well aware that if word got out about his involvement in sending checks to Mehta, he would be blamed. Following that, it was revealed that Citibank, brokers such as Pallav Sheth and Ajay Kayan, industrialists such as Aditya Birla and Hemendra Kothari, a number of politicians, and RBI Governor S.Venkitaramanan had all played a role in permitting or enabling Mehta’s share market manipulation. 

Realization of Scam and Market Crash

When it became clear that Mehta was a disproportionately significant investor in government assets, the swindle became obvious in late April 1992. Mehta was doing more than a third of India’s overall securities business at the time. When the public understood that Mehta’s investments were fraudulent and that his equities were likely worthless, Mehta’s equities were sold in a frenzy. Banks that had lent money to Mehta suddenly found themselves with hundreds of millions of dollars in unsecured debts. The combination of the selling frenzy and the fact that multiple banks had been cheated caused the Indian stock market to fall, with values plummeting by 40% almost instantly. Stocks finally fell 72 percent, resulting in a two-year bear market.

REFERENCES

https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/indias-biggest-scams.html?amp#aoh=16234170885051&amp_ct=1623417213473&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s

https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/markets/harshad-mehta-scam-10-key-points-of-the-scam-that-jolted-india-in-1992-5939931.html

https://www.cnbctv18.com/market/scam-1992-harshad-mehta-scam-explained-7417101.htm

Latest Posts


Archives

This article is written by Muskan Harlalka, a 2nd-year law student from the School of Law, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Rajasthan. The article aims to discuss the status of an individual under Public International Law.

International Law 

It is the law that provides rules and principles to govern the relations of States with each other, as well as the relations between individuals and States, and the relations between international organizations. The term ‘international law’ is also known as the Law of Nations. It was given by Jeremy Bentham, who was an English philosopher, in the year 1780. In International law, a country is referred to as ‘State’.   

International law is of two types – Private International Law and Public International Law. These two are as discussed below :- 

  1. Private International Law: Private International Law governs the relationship and dealings between individuals of different countries. These dealings may sometimes lead to controversies that affect the relationship between nations.
  2. Public International Law: Public International Law governs the issues arising as a result of the dealings between several nations or nations and the citizens or subjects of other nations.

In the last few years, the distinction between public and private international law has become uncertain. Issues of private international law may also come under the purview of public international law or have international significance.  

Individual” under International Law

When we speak of individuals with regard to their status in public international law, i.e. individuals entitled to rights and duties under international law, the term “individual” here has a broader scope. “Individual” in the legal sense means any subject of international law, thus it includes not only a human being, but also a commercial enterprise with a legal personality, and a foundation. This does not mean that all individuals have the same rights, it simply indicates that the term “individual” is taken in the broader sense.

Status of Individual 

  1. Before 1945 : Before 1945, the individual did not have any special status in the public international law. He could be regulated under international law, but he did not enjoy any rights and duties as an individual under the international legal order. This was because public international laws are laws governing states, and individuals are the citizens of those states, thus they were deemed to be objects instead of subjects. They were not considered to be competent to have rights and duties under international law. 

                     However, there were a series of treaties and customary rules concerning individuals, such as treaties protecting minorities, there were a series of rules in customary law known as the “minimum standard”. These rules provided for the way in which foreigners should be treated by the States. 

These regulations may have been for the benefit of the individual, but he could not claim them directly on the basis of customary rules or treaties due to the lack of direct rights or obligations under international law.

                     Earlier, States did not grant rights and duties directly applicable under international law which the individual could claim on his or her behalf from international organizations. It was provided that States would ratify the treaties and incorporate them into their domestic laws, and it was under the scope of this domestic law that the individual could claim the rights provided in those treaties. 

  1. After 1945 : The United Nations Organisation was established in the year 1945 after the end of the Second World War. It was during this time that the concept of International Law developed and became widespread. The experience of the war showed that cultural states could fall into relative barbarism and domestic laws could be deficient or dysfunction or be used for obscure purposes. Thus, the international community began considering the need and possibility of making an individual a subject under international law, thereby granting him legal responsibility and rights.

                    Thus the belief, that the international law is only concerned with interstate relations and an individual is merely an object of the State, has now changed since rights are granted and obligations are being imposed on individuals directly under the public international law. These rights are fundamental subjective rights that come under human rights, on the other hand, the obligations which are imposed on the individuals come under international criminal law, which is concerned with major crimes that can directly hold an individual accountable.

  1. International Treaties directly regulating individual rights : The rules of Public International Law have evolved to address individuals directly and now entail rights and obligations. The Charter of the United Nations of 1945 established the principle of respect for human rights, which was a relatively new concept in international law and international relations. The Charter led to the emergence of international human rights law and dozens of other international instruments that dealt with fundamental freedoms and various aspects of human rights. Some of those instruments are :
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966
  • International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1965
  • International Convention against Torture, 1989
  • International Convention on the Child Rights, 1989

These international instruments have led to the establishment of human rights generations which are as given below :

  • The first generation of civil and political rights
  • The second generation of economic, social and cultural rights
  • Third generation of solidarity rights

The developments in international legal relations led to the emergence of legal systems for the protection of human rights at the global and regional levels, thereby enhancing the status of the individual in public international law.

  1. International Treaties that directly impose obligations on the Individual : 

The establishment of the principle of international criminal responsibility has increased the obligations imposed on individuals by the rules of public international law.

An individual who commits serious crimes against the international community is prosecuted before the relevant international criminal tribunals regardless of his official status.

International crimes against which individuals are prosecuted are classified as :

  • War Crimes
  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Crimes of aggression

Some international treaties address individuals directly and impose obligations that must be met under international criminal responsibility. These treaties include :

  • International Convention for the suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948
  • The four Geneva Conventions of 1949
  • International Convention against War Crimes of 1968
  • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1988
  1. The Right to Submit Complaints and Claims at the international level : With unprecedented developments in international law, an individual can now file complaints and allegations directly with international judicial bodies and institutions to lift violations and obtain compensation for damages.

Conclusion

The status of individuals has significantly improved and they are now being recognised as participants and subjects of Public International Law. This has occurred mainly through the Humanitarian and Human rights laws coming together with the evolution of the Traditional International Law. Individuals are now granted certain rights and obligations directly under International Law.

Latest Posts


Archives