This is a major decision by the Supreme Court, which determined that the online arbitration agreement is the most relevant arbitration document. Because the parties do not meet in person, but rather online, it is important to clarify all details of the dispute resolution method in the agreement. Furthermore, the court found that when enteringRead More
Equivalent citations 1965 AIR 491, 1964 SCR (4) 576 Petitioner The University of Mysore and Anr Respondent C. D. Govinda Rao and Anr Date of Judgement 26/08/1963 Bench Gajendragadkar, P.B., Subbarao, K., Wanchoo, K.N., Ayyangar, N. Rajagopala, Mudholkar, J.R. FACTS OF THE CASE The appeal was recorded by C. D. Govinda Rao, in the MysoreRead More
Equivalent Citation Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012, (2017) 10 SCC 1 Bench Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, R. K. Agrawal, J. S. Khehar, S. A. Bobde, S. A. Nazeer, R. K. Agrawal, J. Chelameswar, A.M. Sapre JJ Decided on 24th August 2017 Relevant Act/ Section Article 19,19(1)(a), 21 and 25 Brief FactsRead More
CITATION OF THE CASE Writ Petition (civil) 202 of 1995 DATE OF CASE December 12, 1996 APPELLANT T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad RESPONDENT Union of India & Ors BENCH/JUDGES Y.K. Sabharwal, Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia STATUTES INVOLVED Article 48A, Article 51A of The Constitution of India, Section 2 of forest conservation act. INTRODUCTION A writ requestRead More
Citation of the case AIR 2018 SC 4321; W. P. (Crl.) No. 76 of 2016; D. No. 14961/2016. Date of the case 6 September 2018 Petitioner Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. Respondent(s) Union of India & Ors. Bench/Judges Dipak Misra, R. F. Nariman, D. Y. Chandrachud, and Indu Malhotra. Statutes Involved The Constitution of India,Read More
CASE NUMBER Appeal No. 273 of 1979 CITATIONS AIR 1980 SC 898, 1980 CriLJ 636, 1982 (1) SCALE 713, (1980) 2 SCC 684, 1983 1 SCR 145 BENCH Y Chandrachud, A Gupta, N Untwalia, P Bhagwati, R Sarkaria DECIDED ON 9 MAY, 1980. This reference to the Constitution Bench raises a question in regard to the constitutionalRead More
Introduction Spyware has always been a murky subject in terms of spying between governments. Spyware has been viewed as a critical component since it is thought critically to monitor and identify individuals who may be involved in illegal or terrorist activities. On the other hand, it is hugely controversial because, while ostensibly targeting criminal activity,Read More
Case number Criminal Appeal No. 195 of 1960 Equivalent citation AIR 1962 SC 605 Bench Hon’ble Justice K. Subba Rao. Date of Judgement November 24, 1961. Relevant Act(s) The “Evidence Act, 1872”; the “Indian Penal Code, 1860”. Facts of the case K.M. Nanavati is the petitioner. He was an Indian naval Officer then. He wasRead More
Case number Writ Petition (C) No. 1031 of 2019. Equivalent citation AIR 2020 SC 1308. Bench Hon’ble Chief Justice of India N. V. Ramana, Hon’ble Justice R. Subhash Reddy, Hon’ble Justice B. R. Gavai. Date of Judgement January 10, 2020. Relevant Act(s) “Constitution of India”, “The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005”, “The IndianRead More
Case number Criminal Appeal No. 573 of 2016. Equivalent citation (2021) 6 SCC 213. Bench CJI N. V. Ramana, Hon’ble Justice Surya Kant and Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Bose. Date of Judgement May 7, 2021. Relevant Act(s) The “Evidence Act, 1872”; the “Indian Penal Code, 1860” and the “Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973”. Facts of theRead More
Lexpeeps Pvt Ltd provides tailored legal and business solutions, empowering businesses, startups, and professionals with innovative, comprehensive support and cutting-edge services for over half a decade.
© Copyright 2024 Lexpeeps All Rights Reserved | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy