Tag: #IndianPenalCode

INTRODUCTION

Computers seem to have made our life easier as they could be used for several purposes like education, payment of various bills, source of entertainment, and access to surplus information of the global world among many others. What we often ignore is the threat it poses to whoever has access to it in the advanced form of crime known as ‘Cyber Crime’. Cybercrime is all about the use of a computer where either a computer is used to commit a crime or a crime has been committed by targeting a computer. In order to prevent such computer crimes, we now need a computer-based law called ‘Cyber Law’. Cyber laws protect computer networks against other computer networks by laying down rules, regulations, and guidelines regarding Cybercrimes.

CYBERCRIME

Cybercrime is an illegal invasion of information stored by an individual, corporations, and governments. Such invasion may not take place physically; the offender and victim may never be in contact with each other but what they invade is a personal and corporate digital body. The world’s first cybercrime was conducted in the year 1834 French Telegraph System when thieves hacked into the system of the French telegraph and succeeded in stealing financial market information. Since then, many cyber-crimes have been committed like Morris Code Worm, Malicious Code, Phishing, DNS Attack, BotNets, Bitcoin Wallet, and Android hack. Governments of many countries have started working together to stop such crimes.

TYPES OF CYBERCRIME

A. AGAINST INDIVIDUALS

a. Email Spoofing: The message appears to have been received from somewhere other than the actual source.

b. Spamming: Same message sent to millions of addresses in the hope to receive a response.

c. Cyber Defamation: Publishing of false information on cyberspace to harm the reputation of the person concerned.

d. Phishing: Stealing information by identifying himself/herself as the individual whose identity is stolen.

B. AGAINST PROPERTY

a. Software piracy: Copying of software illegally

b. Copyright infringement: Using any text, picture, music, or book that is under someone else right. 

C. AGAINST ORGANISATION

a. DOS Attack: The offender floods the server with numerous traffic so that the files cannot be accessed by the rightful owner.

b. Email Bombing: Infinite number of emails is sent to an email address to flood the service to which the email address belongs.  

D. AGAINST SOCIETY

a. Forgery: Where false currency, signatures and documents are produced.

b. Web Jacking: Fake websites are created to access the information of another.  

WHY CYBER CRIME?

1. EASY ACCESS: Lack of security and complex technology about which cybercriminals are well aware leads to breaches of data and much important information.
2. LESS USAGE OF MEMORY: Computers are prone to store a large amount of data in small spaces making it easier to be accessed by cybercriminals.
3. COMPLEXITY:  Programmes run under, millions of codes to which a layman is unaware and cybercriminals take advantage of this.
4. IGNORANCE: Human beings unaware of the computer world tend to ignore many factors related to the security of data which may lead to an illegal invasion of an uninvited guest.
5. DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE: Cyber criminals are used to committing the same crime over the year again and again which leads to efficiency in their way of data leads us that there through evidence of them breaking in the first place.

CYBERLAW

Cyber Law plays an important role to control crimes committed through computer networking and concerns all aspects involving technology have cyber laws about it.

In India, cyber laws origin can be traced in—

Information Technology Act 2000

Act based on United Nations Model Law on Electronic Commerce 1996.

The act gives:

1. E-Mail is valid and legal for communication.
2. Digital signatures are given legal status.
3. Digital certificates to new companies.
4. Government can issue e notices.
5. Communication between companies and the government can be done through an online network.
6. Addressing grievances of the general public through an online portal.
7. Ensuring security to digital data.

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India¹ legal status of Section 66A of IT Act, 2002 was challenged before the honourable Supreme Court. In the instant case, two women were arrested after posting objectionable comments due to the complete shutdown of Mumbai on the death of a political leader, in retorting they question the constitutionality of Section 66A of the said act. Whereas, the court held that Section 66A is legally valid as the statement given by an individual may be annoying even if not affecting reputation, and does not violate article 14 of the Indian constitution as there is intelligible differentia between speech by cyberspace and other forms of speech.

Avnish Bajaj v. State (NCT) of Delhi² in this case CEO of the website Bazee.com was arrested on the ground of broadcasting cyber pornography but was soon released as he was supposed to be nowhere involved in the said offence and shreds of evidence which were collected are directed towards some others who used the service of the website for sharing the cyber pornography.

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860

In India the Penalties of some offences are also mentioned in other acts depending upon the damage it may cause to the victim therefore offences like obscene material or sexually exploiting of children transferred electronically through the system of networks, acts of voyeurism, stalking, cheating, theft through electronic devices are all punishable offences under IPC.

State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti³ the accused in the instant case was a friend of the victim and was eager to marry her but the victim declined and got married [i]to someone else and later got divorced. Therefore, the accused coaxed the victim once again only to get rejected. Then accused made a fake account of Id on email by the victim’s name and posted obscene and defamatory information about the victim resulting in his arrest. Later, was charged with 2 years of rigorous imprisonment and a year of simple imprisonment along with a fine.

CBI v. Arif Azim⁴ through this case India got its very first cybercrime conviction someone named Barbara Campa logged into a website through which someone from a foreign country can purchase products to be delivered in India. The purchase of a Sony Colour TV with the wireless telephone was made under the same Id. Later, The credit card agency claims that the owner of the card through which payment was done had not done any purchase. CBI investigated the case and found that Arif Azim to whom the delivery was made worked at a call centre somehow got the details of Barbara Campa whose card was used for purchase. Arif Azim being a youth and first-time offender was released on probation for a year.

COMPANIES ACT 2013

The act specifies the technical requirements for a company and gives the government the power to punish anyone who doesn’t complement the technical requirements. Over time the effectiveness of these laws is advancing, giving guidelines for companies and their management to abide by.

IMPORTANCE OF CYBER LAW

Cyber laws are very important in the era of computers and advanced technology. It helps small-scale industries work effectively so that their productivity doesn’t get harmed, and allows the company to surf the internet without any barrier. Data recorded would be preserved and due to penalties, the capable intruder may not do so.

Presently, the Central government has no plan to form any organisation to deal with such matters but the government did make laws that are efficient enough. The government presented the National Cyber Security Council 2013 with the ministry of IT and Electronics aiming at the prevention of cyber threats, minimizing the damage done by cybercrime, and protecting the structure and data of computers. Ministry of home affairs passed a scheme aiming to prevent cyber crimes against children and women.

India is at 23rd rank out of 183 countries on the Global Cybersecurity Index of the UN. Further, the government aims at making it in the top ten of the list in the coming year.

CYBERSECURITY IN INDIA

Cybersecurity is the protection of the systems of networks by a firm or an individual for the sake of the protection of data in their system. Cybersecurity of one must be strong enough to fight against the illegal invasion by someone with the intention of misusing the data. With the advancement in technology, there are numerous ways in which one can invade your personal space due to these systems of the network must be protected effectively and efficiently.

To handle the problem of cybercrime—

• Using strong passwords.
• Protect your data with enough strong encryption.
• Protection of your personal information.
• Keep your systems updated.
• Usage of antivirus programs.

CONCLUSION

Nowadays, cybercriminals are harmful to both developed and developing countries, therefore they should work together to fight against cybercrime. Budapest Convention is the only multilateral treaty signed internationally in 2001 by various countries which came into existence in 2004. It provides guidelines to countries for the creation of a system that fights against cybercrime. In 2017, a Russian Resolution was put before United Nations that aims at sharing data among countries to prevent cybercrime. India states that sharing data with foreign countries goes against the National sovereignty of India and Budapest convention was drafted without the presence of India therefore it stands neutral.

Citations:

1. AIR 2015 SC 1523
2. 2008 DRJ 721: (2008) 150 DRT 769
3. C No. 4680 of 2004
4. 2013

This article is written by Simran Gulia, a BA LLB student from Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management.

Case Number

Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021

Equivalent Citation

2021 SCC OnLine SC 230

Bench

• Justice S Ravindra Bhat
• Justice AM Khanwilkar

Decided On

March 18, 2021

Relevant Act/Sections

• Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
• Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

Brief Facts & Procedural History

The petition was filed by Advocate Aparna Bhat and eight other lawyers in response to an unjustified order issued by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on July 30, in which the accused of sexual assault was ordered to visit the victim’s home on the occasion of Raksha Bandhan with Rakhi and be tied by her as a condition of bail. The accused, who is a neighbour of the complainant Sarda Bai, entered her house on April 20, 2020, and attempted to sexually harass her, prompting the filing of (hereafter referred to as IPC). After the case was investigated, a charge sheet was filed. Under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused filed an application for anticipatory bail (hereafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) The accused was granted bail by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on the affliction that he and his wife visit Sarda Bai’s house on the occasion of Raksha Bandhan on August 3, 2020, with a package of sweets and ask her to tie the Rakhi to him with the pledge that he will protect her to the best of his ability in the future. The accused was also directed to hand up Rs. 11,000 as a gesture of gift given by brothers to their sisters as part of the customary Raksha Bandhan rites, which the petitioners have challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

The petitioner filed a writ plea in the Supreme Court of India against the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order. The following prayers were included in the petition:

1. The Supreme Court directed the High Courts and trial courts not to make such observations in situations of rape and sexual assault which would trivialize the anguish endured by the victim and impair their dignity.
2. The courts should not aim at compromises such as encouraging marriage between the accused and the prosecutrix and it should not be considered a judicial remedy. Compromises like this go against a woman’s honour and dignity. The petitioner cited the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Madanlal¹ in support of his claim.
3. The appellants further urged that no judge make any remarks or observations in the ruling that would reflect their prejudices and harm the woman’s dignity.
4. In circumstances of sexual assault, no such restriction should be imposed that permits the applicant to see the complainant or her family members. The court was requested to provide gender sensitization directives for the bar and bench, as well as law students.
5. Also, under Sections 437 and 438 of the Cr. P.C, the court was asked to set instructions on legally feasible bail terms.

Issues before the Court

• Can a compromise be struck between the accused and the victim in such instances?
• Is it acceptable for courts to issue such orders, and if so, what effect will such judgments have on society?
• Do such directions constitute to conduct of the trial in an unfair manner?
• Can the accused be permitted to meet the survivor or any of the members of her family?
• What, most importantly, should be the guidelines that courts should follow when granting bail and anticipatory bail?

Decision of the Court

In rape and sexual assault cases, the court clarified that no compromise can be made or even considered under any circumstances because it would be against her honour. Courts and other law enforcement authorities are intended to be neutral agencies and are tasked to guarantee the fair conduct of the trial by preserving impartiality and neutrality. And such techniques in rape and sexual assault trials would shatter rape survivors’ faith in the court’s impartiality. The court also noted that women’s status and society’s attitude toward them are both poor, and they suffer greatly. They are already experiencing numerous problems in their life for being a woman in our culture.

Judgements set precedents that the entire society adopts at different stages: By judicial decree, orders such as tying Rakhi on the accused’s wrist transform the molesters into brothers, reducing and degrading the charge of sexual harassment. Therefore, the use of reasoning/language which lessens the offence and seeks to belittle the victim is notably to be avoided under all circumstances. The law does not allow or condone such behaviour, in which the survivor may be traumatized several times or forced into some form of non-voluntary acceptance, or be pushed by circumstances to accept and condone behaviour that is a major violation.

The petitioners urged that the High Court’s decision should be overturned. The petitioners argued that Sections 437 (3)(c) and 438(2)(iv) of the CrPC permit courts to impose whatever condition they see proper in the public interest, but that the conditions must be consistent with the other provisions. When considering cases of rape and sexual assault, the court in Ramphal v. State of Haryana² concluded that compromise is irrelevant. The petitioner also requested that no judgement or order be passed by the court that could affect the dignity of women or the fair and unbiased conduct of trials, citing several cases where the apex court has rejected the idea of compromise on the grounds that it is antithetical to the woman’s honour and dignity and that it disparages and downgrades otherwise heinous crimes, implying that such offences are remediable by the judicial system.

The intervenors’ counsel argued that the court had the competence to impose sanctions under Sections 437(2) and 438. Requirements come in a broad variety of forms, and the court cited a number of cases in which judges imposed specific conditions for granting bail.

In its order, the Supreme Court framed various guidelines. These are as follows:

1. Contact between the accused and the complainant should never be allowed as a condition of bail, and if bail is granted, the complainant should be informed as soon as possible, along with a copy of the bail order being delivered to her within two days.
2. Bail conditions must precisely adhere to the stipulations of the Cr.P.C., and the order shall not represent patriarchal attitudes toward women.
3. Any offer to the accused and victim for a compromise, such as getting married or mandating mediation, should be ignored since it is outside the court’s authority.
4. The court has ordered a module as part of every judge’s basic training to ensure that judges are sensitive while considering cases involving sexual offenses and to minimize ingrained societal bias and sexism.
5. The National Judicial Academy has also been urged to integrate gender sanitization as soon as feasible in the training of young judges.
6. Similarly, the Bar Council of India has been mandated to incorporate gender sanitization in the LL.B. curriculum and as a mandatory topic in the All-India Bar Exam syllabus.

The Supreme Court commended the petitioner for his insightful ideas and overturned the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s bail terms. The court has established certain criteria in this regard. It also agreed to the recommendations for a gender sensitization curriculum in law schools, as well as for the bar exam and introduction training for newly appointed judges.

Conclusion

The victims of sexual abuse have always been blamed on Indian society. Women have been questioned repeatedly about their behavior, clothing choices, attitude, and when they plan to leave their homes. During trials, judges have frequently reinforced this practice by questioning the victim and making remarks that stereotype particular behaviors and threaten to disrupt the trial. With the Supreme Court openly criticizing such behavior on the part of the courts, hope for judicial reform has been reignited. Gender sensitization seminars will also aid in raising awareness of the issue among legal professionals.

By delivering this order, the Supreme Court has established a significant precedent for courts to follow in dealing with sexual assault victims in the future. Discussing the faults of a patriarchal culture has set an example for its enormous audience. This will go down in history as a significant step toward women’s independence. It is hoped that if the standards are followed, we will not see such arbitrary conditions in judicial orders in the future.

Almost certainly that judges assume the most essential part as the educator, as the defender, and as the watchman, and anything they say turns into the points of reference that is then trailed by lower courts in their decisions, and consequently it turns out to be vital for the judges to take the most extensive level of care while offering any expression which influences the actual premise of legal executive and confidence of individuals. In cases connected with the assemblage of ladies and particularly in sexual offenses cases, even little mistakes either as a judgment or any assertion made by courts might prompt genuine offense against the survivors. There have been different examples of orientation related cases as of late when courts have believed the victim to make split the difference by permitting the accused to marry her or as in the present case by requesting him to get Rakhi tied on his wrist by the victim or by making some other split the difference as the court might coordinate. Such translations are horrendous in nature and show the quality of judges towards the ladies yet as it is said Judiciary is a self-recuperating process, present judgment by Supreme Court validated the explanation. Outlining the guidelines for orientation sterilization and adding it to the curriculum of LLB will assist the legal advisors with instilling the impartial and nonpartisan quality towards the ladies which will most likely assist the victims in fair direct preliminary with practically no dread on their part.

Intentional or otherwise, such comments by trial courts and high courts should be avoided at all costs. Judicial stereotyping is another term for this. When judges attach specific attributes to someone based on their gender, religion, caste, or race, this is known as judicial stereotyping. Judges often reinforce hazardous prejudices as a result of this, rather than questioning them as they are intended to. Because of the vast audience that court declarations serve; such remarks can have a greater social impact. Stereotyping also has the potential to undermine the judge’s impartiality, obstructing a fair trial. Creating rape myths or an idealized picture of a sexual assault victim also undermines the incident’s credibility and the harm suffered by survivors of sexual assault who do not fit the public image of a chaste lady.

Women are underrepresented in the legal profession, and women lawyers frequently experience discrimination and discriminatory remarks. As a result, in order to assure gender-biased-free judgments, the first step should be to create an equal environment within the institution and raise awareness about the issue. The answer to these ills comes from public discourse and keeping organizations with the potential to make a difference responsible. Such sexist judgments should be condemned and held up as an example of what is not acceptable behavior.

Citations:

1. (2015) 7 SCC 681
2. 2019 SC 1716

This case analysis is done by Arryan Mohanty, a 2nd Year Student student of Symbiosis Law School.

Case Number

CRL.A. 157/2013

Equivalent Citation

247 (2018) DLT 31

Bench

Justice S Muralidhar, Justice IS Mehta 

Decided On

November 30, 2017

Relevant Act/Section

• Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
• The Indian Electricity Act, 1910
• The Indian Penal code
• The Companies Act, 1956

Brief Facts and Procedural History

An exhaustive judgment given on September 15, 2016, allowed the allure. Notwithstanding, on that date, the Court gave a different choice featuring three worries that emerged in a bigger setting and selected Prof. (Dr.) G.S. Bajpai, Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Registrar, National Law University, Delhi, as amicus curiae to give guidance.

Issues before the Court

• Is the substantive law and procedure relating to the default in payment of a fine?
• Whether the existing law on suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC?
• Whether there is any provision that may enable the Court to suspend the order of conviction as normally what is suspended is the execution of the sentence?

Decision of the Court:

The Supreme Court communicated in Palaniappa Gounder v. State of Tamil Nadu¹ that “the fine discipline ought not to be pointlessly lavish”.

“However, there is the capacity to integrate a sentence of death or life imprisonment with a sentence of fine,” it was added. “That power should be polished with caution, considering that the life sentence is an outrageous discipline to force, and adding a fine to that grave discipline is not completely resolved to fill any accommodating need.”.”

The Supreme Court reaffirmed on account of Shantilal v. the State of M.P. that there was a total abuse of the arrangement of frameworks in Sections 63 to 70 IPC, causing legal to notice the instance of Shahejadkhan Mahebubkhan Pathan v. the State of Gujarat, where the Supreme Court totally abused the arrangement of frameworks in Sections 63 to 70 IPC.

Nonetheless, detainment for non-installment of fines is in another equilibrium. In the place where such a sentence is implemented, an individual is supposed to be detained in light of the fact that the person can’t pay the fine or won’t pay the fine. We are of the assessment that it is the occupant of the Court to keep an assessment of the case, the conditions under which it is held, the area of the case, the litigant, and other significant contemplations, for instance, the monetary conditions of the respondent in regard of and how much the offense prior to requesting that the culprit endure detainment when the individual in question is fined. The arrangements of Sections 63 to 70 of the IPC specify that the punishment rate ought not to be brutal or nonsensical. We additionally stress that in the case of a basic term of detainment, outlandish fines ought not to be forced by some other means than uncommon offenses. “

Clearly, no preparation is honored with use and purified in time that can’t be permitted to win in a circumstance where it attempts to cause disgrace. Each activity of the Court should be trailed by its governmental policy regarding minorities in society because of authentic worries about uniformity. Preparing not to give bail to an individual condemned to life detainment was going on in the High Courts and in this Court on the premise that assuming an individual is considered fit for preliminary and condemned to life detainment, the person ought not to be delivered. , as long as his endless sentence can be saved, yet the fundamental reason for this preparing was that the enticement of such an individual would be disposed of throughout some undefined time frame, so it was expected that he, at last, appeared to be dependable, he would have no need to endlessly remain in jail. The thought of this preparation may not have any significant bearing in the event that the Court isn’t in that frame of mind of interest for five or six years. Without a doubt, it would be a wrongdoing to compare and save an individual from jail for a time of five or six years for wrongdoing that at last seems to have not been carried out. When could the Court at any point pay him for his apparently outrageous captures? It would be fair regardless for the Court to tell the person: “We have admitted your enchantment as we suspect you are at legitimate fault for your appearance, yet tragically we have not had the potential chance to hear your temptation for a long time and, subsequently, up to this point. We hear your enticement, you ought to remain in jail, regardless of the way that you are straightforward? “the adjudicator could never have been overwhelmed by regret while eliminating such an individual in the wake of hearing the enticement? Could it not be an assault on his feeling of equity? in the past it ought to be reconsidered for quite a while as this Court isn’t in that frame of mind of hearing the temptation of the denounced as soon as possible, the Court ought to, except if there is valid justification to make a move regardless, delivering the indicted individual in situations where exceptional leave is taken into account the respondent to apply for conviction and sentence. “

Section 389 (1) states that in the repercussions of any allure against a respondent, the Court of Appeal may because it must be recorded as a held duplicate, demand that the sentence or allure be suspended in like manner, guaranteeing that he had the power, to be delivered on bail, or on his bond. This proviso acquaints the non-select power with suspending the condemning and award bail and notwithstanding suspending the activity of the basic allure.

This issue was completely inspected by a three-judge bench of this Court in Rama Narang v. Ramesh Narang and Ors.²

The legal position, appropriately, is clear that the Court of Appeal may suspend or grant an application for sentencing. However, the person wishing to remain guilty must clearly state the consideration of the Court reversing the consequences of his or her conviction. Unless the Court’s decision is based on the possible consequences of a conviction, the convicted person will not be able to apply for conviction. In addition, the reward for remaining guilty can be converted to extraordinary cases depending on the shocking facts of the case. “

The legal status of the Supreme Court under Section 389 of the CrPC is very clear, it is enough for this Court to repeat it.

There is a real need, right, for a formal (proper) administration to provide relief and rehabilitation for the injured through extrajudicial executions and arrests. Whether this should be a law that governs everything or a system that specifically addresses the needs of the survivor, and those who are unjustly imprisoned, including the family and guardians of the detainee, or these should be governed by different rules or arrangements for discussion, consideration, and consultation with The purpose of the article is to pay for those who are unjustly detained, questions about the circumstances and circumstances in which such assistance can be obtained, in what structure and at what stage and are matters for consideration. This is the best work left in the main case of a body tasked with informing government officials of control measures expected to fill an undeniable hole.

The Court, appropriately, compels the Indian Law Commission to attempt a thorough investigation of the matter referred to in paragraphs 11 to 16 of this application and to make its recommendation to the Government of India.

Conclusion

In this case, the Delhi High Court expressed profound concern over the plight of innocent people who have been unfairly convicted and imprisoned for crimes they did not commit. The Court emphasized the urgent need for a legislative framework to provide relief and rehabilitation to victims of wrongful prosecution and incarceration and urged the Law Commission to conduct a thorough review of the aforementioned issues and submit recommendations to the Indian government.

In the current state of the criminal justice system in the country, an adequate reaction from the state to victims of a miscarriage of justice resulting in erroneous prosecutions is absent. There is also no statutory or regulatory framework detailing the state’s approach to the problem.

According to the solicitation made by the court, the Law Commission of India introduced a report to the Government of India in August 2018 named “Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice): Legal Remedies.” In this paper, the point is analyzed with regard to the Indian law enforcement framework, and the expression “wrongful prosecution” is suggested as the limit for a miscarriage of justice, rather than “wrongful conviction” and “wrongful imprisonment.” ‘Wrongful prosecution’ alludes to circumstances in which the blamed isn’t blameworthy for the wrongdoing, however, the police and additionally prosecution are occupied with bad behavior in exploring or potentially indicting the individual.

It would cover both cases in which the person served time in jail and those in which he did not; as well as those in which the accused was found not guilty by the trial court or was convicted by one or more courts but was ultimately found not guilty by the Higher Court. The report provides an outline of the various legal remedies and evaluates their shortcomings (also noted by the High Court in the aforementioned Order).

As a result, the Commission recommends enactment of a specific legal provision for wrongful prosecution redress – to provide monetary and non-monetary compensation to victims of wrongful prosecution within a statutory framework (such as counseling, mental health services, vocational / employment skills development, and so on). The Report lays out the core principles of the proposed framework, including defining “wrongful prosecution,” or cases in which a claim for compensation can be filed, naming a Special Court to hear these claims, the nature of the proceedings – timelines for deciding the claim, etc., financial and other factors to be considered in determining compensation, provisions for interim compensation in certain cases, and removing disqualification due to wrongful prosecution.

Hence, a legal (ideally legislative) framework for giving relief and rehabilitation to victims of wrongful prosecution and incarceration is urgently needed. In addition to the topic of paying persons who have been unfairly imprisoned, consideration should be given to the situations and conditions under which such relief would be available, as well as the form and stage at which such relief would be provided.

Citations:

1. (1977) 2 SCC 634
2. (1995) 2 SCC 513

This case analysis is done by Arryan Mohanty, a 2nd Year Student student of Symbiosis Law School.

Introduction

A country’s law should develop with the progression of time and the progression of time. In troublesome times, as in any respectful society, society requires more thorough and brutal guidelines, however the topic of how much stricter and more rigid a law should remain with regards to making a specific regulation. In India, a far-reaching and comprehensive way to deal with the laws is expected to oversee sexual offenses. A decent code ought to have three attributes, as per Macaulay, the planner of the Indian Penal Code: accuracy (liberated from vagueness), conceivability (simple clear by normal individuals), and it ought to be a product of legislature law-making (least judicial intervention).¹

The world is dynamic; changes happen in light of cultural prerequisites, as well as the overall individuals who have been involved in a situation in that society. For instance, there was basically no law to manage cyber-wrongdoings in the eighteenth century, yet because of innovative enhancements and dynamic perspectives, the Cyber Law grew simply. Because of the startling flood in the number of cyber dangers, ransomware, and other cyber offenses, we understood that law to address these advanced wrongdoings was required. Essentially, the Criminal Law Amendment Bill 2018 proposes to change key bits of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Public Order and Security Act, as well as increment the base discipline for assault, including the age part.

Before the 2018 Amendment Act, the Criminal laws has been revised in the year 2013, concerning the previously mentioned issues as they were. The amendment in the criminal laws was required after the Nirbhaya case. Nirbhaya, a 23-year-old paramedical understudy, was violently gang-raped, assaulted, and tortured in a moving transport on the evening of December 16, 2012. She passed on from her wounds on December 28, 2012, in the wake of battling for her life. This deplorable demonstration ignited an impressive shock in the nation over. The public demanded that the charged be hanged, yet in addition that the nation’s assault laws be changed. Following the Nirbhaya episode on December 23, 2012, a three-part council was framed, drove by Late Justice J.S. Verma, previous Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India, with Justice Leila Seth, previous Judge of the High Court, and Gopal Subramanium, previous Solicitor General of India, to prescribe changes to the Criminal Law to the Legislature to make assault laws and different violations against ladies more contentious. Accordingly, the Criminal Law Amendment of 2013 was sanctioned.²

Indeed, even after the draconian measures authorized by The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 in the fallout of the Nirbhaya case, the general public was again stunned by a rate in Kathua, Jammu, and Kashmir. An 8-year-old young lady capitulated to a gang’s desire and was sexually assaulted and killed, therefore. This sickening episode fills in as a suggestion to society that the assault culture has continued as well as weavers in our general public, where such violations are finished without risk of punishment. Because of the far-reaching announcing and public objection encompassing the matter, parliament had to take on “restorative measures.” The Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018, was accordingly supported by the bureau and endorsed by the President on April 21, 2018. The announcement hardened the punishments for people blamed for assaulting youths, including capital punishment.

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, was approved by the Lok Sabha on March 19, 2013, and the Rajya Sabha on March 21, 2013. The Bill was signed by the President on April 2, 2013, and it was deemed to take effect on February 3, 2013. On 3 February 2013, India’s President, Pranab Mukherjee, issued an Ordinance to that effect.

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 2013 updated and added new sections to the Indian Penal Code (IPC) relating to numerous sexual offenses. Certain acts were expressly recognized as offenses under the Act, which were dealt with under relevant laws. The Indian Penal Code has been amended to include new offenses such as acid attacks, sexual harassment, voyeurism, and stalking.³ The amendments made by the Act are mentioned as follows:

1. Section 354A
   Previously, a man who makes unwanted sexual advances, forcefully shows pornography, or demands/requests sexual favors from a woman committed the offense of sexual harassment simpliciter under section 354A, which is punishable by up to three years in jail. Sexual harassment, which is punishable by up to a year in prison, also includes making sexually tinged remarks.
2. Section 354B
   If a male assaults or uses unlawful force against a woman, or aids or abets such an act with the goal of disrobing or compelling her to remain naked in a public place, he commits an offense under section 354B, which carries a sentence of three to seven years in prison. This section deals with a fairly specific offense, and it complements and adds to the clause dealing with outraging a woman’s modesty. This is a good provision, given the numerous examples of women being stripped in public as a kind of punishment, mostly in impoverished communities, as reported in the news.
3. Section 354C
   Any man who views or takes the image of a woman engaged in a private act in circumstances where she would normally expect not to be viewed either by the perpetrator or by any other person at the perpetrator’s command, and then disseminates such image is guilty. Such a person is liable under Section 354C. A first conviction carries a sentence of imprisonment of not less than one year, but not more than three years, and a fine, while a second or subsequent conviction carries a sentence of imprisonment of either description for a term of not less than three years, but not more than seven years, and a fine.
4. Section 354D
   Under this new section, stalking has been designated as a specific offense. If a male stalks a woman, he could face a sentence of up to three years in jail for the first offense and up to five years for consecutive offenses. However, there are some exceptions, such as if a person can establish that the actions were taken in accordance with the law, were reasonable, or were necessary to avoid a crime. According to Section 354D, the crime of stalking was a gender-neutral offense, meaning that it may be committed by either a man or a woman.
5. Section 375
   Under the new section, a man is considered to have committed rape if:
   (a) Penetration of penis into vagina, urethra, mouth, or anus of any person, or making any other person do so with him or any other person;
   (b) Insertion of any object or any body part, not being a penis, into the vagina, urethra, mouth, or anus of any person, or making any other person do so with him or any other person;
   (c) Possession of any bodily part with the intent of inducing penetration of the vagina, urethra, mouth, anus, or any other body part of the individual, or compelling the subject to do so with him or another individual.
   (d) Applying the mouth to a woman’s penis, vagina, anus, or urethra, or causing another person to do so with him or another person.;
   (e) Ultimately, contact the vagina, penis, anus, or bosom of the individual or makes the individual touch the vagina, penis, anus, or bosom of that individual or some other individual.

The 2013 Act expands the meaning of rape to incorporate oral sex and the inclusion of a thing or other real part into a lady’s vagina, urethra, or anus. Rape carries a minimum sentence of seven years in jail and a maximum sentence of life in prison. If a police officer, medical officer, army member, jail officer, public officer, or public servant commits rape, he faces a minimum sentence of ten years in prison. If the victim dies or goes into a vegetative state as a result of the rape, the victim is sentenced to life in prison, with the possibility of death. Under the newly revised provisions, gang rape now carries a minimum sentence of 20 years in prison.

The new amendment clarifies that “consent” is an unequivocal agreement to engage in a specific sexual act; it also clarifies that “consent” does not entail “no resistance.” Non-consent is a crucial component in the commission of rape. As a result, the notion of consent is crucial to the outcome of a rape trial, and it has been used to humiliate and discredit rape victims.⁴

Need for Criminal Amendment Act

According to research by the “Thomson Reuters Foundation,” sexual violence, human trafficking, child labor, underage marriage, and female foeticide make India the most dangerous country for women. In 2012, the National Record Crime Bureau (NRCB) documented 24,923 rape crimes across India, according to its annual report for the year 2013. The culprit was discovered to be a relative of the victim in 98 percent of the cases. Assault has a very low per capita rate and, as a rule, it goes unreported. However, rape instances such as the Kathua rape case and the Unnao rape case sparked considerable public resentment. And a sense of censure leads to media attention and public protests in the name of justice. As a result of the increased willingness to disclose rape incidents, the Indian government has made revisions to the current penal legislation. As a result, the Criminal Amendment Act was absolutely necessary.⁵

Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018

On July 23, 2018, the Ministry of Law and Justice introduced the Criminal Law Amendment Bill 2018, which was passed by the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on July 30 and August 6, respectively. This law attempts to address the problems of sexual assault victims and to enforce the death sentence for anyone convicted of raping a girl under the age of 16 or 12.⁶ It repealed the President of India’s April ordinance and made changes to the following laws:

• IPC 1860
• CrPC 1973
• Evidence Act 1872
• Protection of Child from Sexual Offences (POCSO) 2012

Salient Feature of the Act

This Act makes significant reforms to our penal laws to protect girls from the horrible crime of rape. The following are the details⁷:

• Rape offenders must serve at least ten years in prison; formerly, the minimum sentence was seven years.
• Anyone who rapes a girl under the age of 16 will be sentenced to a minimum of 20 years in prison.
• If a person rapes a girl under the age of 12, he or she will be sentenced to a minimum of 20 years in jail, a maximum of life in prison, or the death penalty.
• If the rape crime is committed against a girl under the age of 16, the accused will not be given anticipatory bail.
• Convicted persons are required to pay the victim, with the funds going toward the victim’s medical expenses and rehabilitation. And the remuneration will be fair and equitable.
• If a police officer commits rape, he or she will be sentenced to a minimum of 10 years in jail, regardless of where the crime takes place.
• In the case of rape, the police are required to conclude the investigation within two months of the FIR being filed.
• After 6 months, the deadline to dispose of the rape appeal begins.
• The law stipulates that anyone guilty of gang rape of a woman under the age of 16 will be sentenced to life in prison and fined.
• Anyone convicted of gang rape of women under the age of 12 faces a sentence of life in prison, a fine, or the death penalty if they are under the age of 12.

Amendments made in IPC

Inserted Sections

I. Section 376AB

• This section was inserted just after Section 376A and states that anyone who commits rape with a woman under the age of 12 years shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term of not less than 20 years, and it may extend to life imprisonment, implying that what he has done is thoroughly illegal and off-base, or in a legal sense, a reminder for that person’s natural life, as well as a fine or death penalty.
• Also obligated to pay compensation, which must be reasonable and just in order to cover medical costs and victim rehabilitation.
• Furthermore, any payment made by the person who has been condemned under this clause must be made to the individual in issue (victim).

II. Section 376DA

• After Section 370D, the 376DA section was added, which states that if a woman under the age of sixteen is raped by one or more people in a group or does something for a common purpose, each of those people is deemed to have committed the crime of rape and shall be punished with life imprisonment, which implies that what he has done is completely illegal and off-base, or in a legal sense, a reminder for that person’s natural life. A
• Also obligated to pay compensation, which must be reasonable and just in order to cover medical costs and victim rehabilitation.
• Furthermore, any payment made by the person who has been condemned under this clause must be made to the individual in issue (victim).

III. Section 376DB

• This section states that if a woman under the age of 12 years is raped by one or more people acting in concert for a common purpose, each person is deemed to have committed the crime of rape and is punished with life imprisonment, which implies that what he has done is thoroughly illegal and off-base, or in a legal sense, a reminder for that person’s natural life, as well as a fine or death penalty.
• Also obligated to pay compensation, which must be reasonable and just in order to cover medical costs and victim rehabilitation.
• Furthermore, any payment made by the person who has been condemned under this clause must be made to the individual in issue (victim).

Amended Sections

I. Section 166A
This provision comprises three clauses that deal with public servants violating lawful orders. Sections 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB are substituted for clause (c).

II. Section 228A
Subsection (1) of this section was replaced with Sections 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB, which deal with the disclosure of the identity of the victim of certain crimes.

III. Section 376
This section deals with the rape penalty and sub-section 1 was replaced with “anyone commits an offence of rape shall be punished for a term not less than ten years or which may extend to life imprisonment and with fine.”
Subsection 2 clause (a) sub-section 1 has been repealed as a result of this alteration to section 376. After sub-section 2 of section 376, a new sub-section “3” was added, which states that anyone who commits rape with a woman under the age of sixteen years shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than 20 years, and may extend to life imprisonment, implying that what he has done is thoroughly illegal and off-base, or in a legal sense, a reminder for that person’s natural life, as well as a fine or detention.

Also obligated to pay compensation, which must be reasonable and just in order to cover medical costs and victim rehabilitation. After sub-section 2 of section 376, a new sub-section “3” was added, which states that anyone who commits rape with a woman under the age of sixteen years shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than 20 years, and may extend to life imprisonment, implying that what he has done is thoroughly illegal and off-base, or in a legal sense, a reminder for that person’s natural life, as well as a fine or detention.

Also obligated to pay compensation, which must be reasonable and just in order to cover medical costs and victim rehabilitation. Furthermore, any payment made by the person who has been condemned under this clause must be made to the individual in issue (victim).

Amendments made in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Two sections of the Indian Evidence Act of 1872 are amended by the Criminal Amendment Act of 2018. The following are some of them:

A. Section 53A

• This section substitutes Sections 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB, which deal with proof of character or previous sexual experience that isn’t applicable in some circumstances.

B. 146th section

• When a witness is cross-examined, he may be asked any question that tends to answer the question hereinbefore referred to, in addition to the question hereinbefore referred to-
  a) Attempt to verify the validity.
  b) To figure out who he is and where he stands in life.
  c) To protect his reputation, harming his character, even if the answer does not directly or indirectly implicate him, could result in a penalty or forfeiture.
• 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB were substituted by section 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB.

Amendments made in CrPC

1. Section 173
   Subsection (1A) of this section was amended to read: “An offense under section 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB or section 376E of the Indian penal code shall be completed within two months.”
2. Section 374
   When an appeal is filed against a sentence given under Section 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB, or Section 376E of the Indian penal code, the appeal shall be disposed of within six months of the date of filing.
3. Section 377
   When an appeal is filed against a sentence given under sections 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB, or section 376E of the Indian penal code, the appeal shall be disposed of within six months of the date of filing.
4. Section 438
   After sub-section (3), a new sub-section (4) was added to Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which states that nothing in this section applies to any case involving the arrest of a person on suspicion of having committed an offense under subsection (3) of Section 376, 376AB, 376DA, or 376DB of the Indian penal code.
5. Section 439
   After sub-section (a) (1), another provision was added to Section 439 of the CrPC, which states that “the high court and the session court shall, before granting bail to a person accused of an offense triable under sub-section (3) of Sections 376, 376AB, 376DA, 376DB, give notice of the applicant for bail to the public prosecutor within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of such notice to the public prosecutor.” The presence of the informant or any person authorized by him is necessary during the hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of sections 376, 376A, 376DA, and 376DB, which was inserted after sub-section (1) of the CrPC.

Amendments made in POSCO Act

Section 42 of the POCSO Act, 2012 has been amended by the Criminal Amendment Act of 2018. Sections 376A, 376C, and 376D of the Indian penal code have been replaced with 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB of the Indian penal code.

Conclusion

In the wake of checking on various adjustments and recently remembered Sections for the IPC, CrPC, Indian Evidence Act, and POCSO Act, as may be obvious, the criminal amendment demonstration of 2018 is simply planned to safeguard women from offensive wrongdoing: sexual attack. As the unjust pace of sexual attacks has expanded, so has the number of people who are truly cruel. Most of the assault cases go unreported, and the absence of legitimate legitimacy, as well as cultural elements, make boundaries to the casualty’s admittance to justice. Nonetheless, subsequent to rolling out important improvements to these reformatory laws, the Government of India tries to give government assistance and a feeling of safety for all women, as it is essential considering ongoing cases, for example, the Kathua assault and Unnao assault cases, which have caused a lamentable circumstance for women in which women accept they are undependable even in their own homes, as the blamed is quite often a family member or a known individual of the person in question, so there is an outright need.

References:

1. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1527–an-analysis-of-criminal-law-amendment-act-2018.html
2. https://blog.ipleaders.in/comparison-rape-laws-criminal-amendment-act-2013/
3. https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/criminal-law-amendment/
4. https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-criminal-law-amendment-bill-2013
5. https://blog.ipleaders.in/criminal-law-amendment-act-2018-2/
6. https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-criminal-law-amendment-bill-2018#:~:text=In%20March%202013%2C%20Parliament%20passed,in%20cases%20of%20repeat%20offenders
7. https://mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/CSdivTheCriminalLawAct_14082018_0.pdf

This article is written by Arryan Mohanty, a 2nd Year Student student of Symbiosis Law School.

INTRODUCTION

Human trafficking is the type of modern-day slavery in which a person is sold or used forcefully for the point of labor or commercial sex act. This is all that happens to intend to earn money. Human trafficking is not just a heinous crime against society but is a sin for our society. It has no boundaries for anyone irrespective of sex, gender, caste, or race anyone can be a victim of human trafficking but the most vulnerable ones are women and children. Children being innocent and getting easily influenced by others became victims of sexual acts. Due to the overpopulation and lack of job opportunities, many women from poor families are forced to get indulged in this profession and in some cases, a close family member becomes the hoes and sells them for such work.

According to the survey of the United Nations Office for drugs and crime [UNODC], it was found that the victim of human trafficking were 51% women, 28% children, and 21% men. Majorly women were abused by sexual violence which is 51%, 28% for children, and 21% for men. There are 43% of victims who are domestically within the national borders have been trafficked, it is shocking to know that the traffickers are not only men but it also constitutes 37% of women and 63% of men.

Some articles in the constitution are related to human trafficking.

ARTICLE 23
Article 23 talks about the prohibition of human trafficking and forced labor. Forced labor means less than minimum wage is paid. Any trafficking in human beings and beggars is prohibited and punishable in accordance with the law. In this article, the state is not prevented from commanding compulsory services for public purposes. The state shall not discriminate based on sex, color, caste, race, or any other. This article not only protects the state but also private citizens.¹

ARTICLE 21
Article 21 is a fundamental right under part 3 of the Indian constitution, which talks about the right to life and personal liberties. It is one of the most essential articles in the Indian constitution. The supreme court of India mentioned it as the ‘heart of fundamental rights ‘. It states that no person shall be deprived of life and liberty except as per the procedure established by law. Everyone is entitled to live with full dignity by birth.²

ARTICLE 51 A [E]
Article 51 A [e] is a fundamental duty to promote Peace, Harmony, and a sense of unity amongst the people of India cut across linguistic, religious, and regional basis, to repudiate practices that can be insulting to women.³

LAWS RELATED TO HUMAN TRAFFICKING

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860

• SECTION 366A
  If any person induces any minor to go with him to any other place with the intention of seducing her or doing illicit activities he or she will be punishable with the imprisonment of 10 years or fine or both.⁴

• SECTION 366B
  Whoever imports a girl from any other country under the age twenty one with the intent to force or seduce her for intercourse with another person then, a person can be liable for imprisonment of 10 years and a fine can also be imposed.⁵

• SECTION 374
  This section deals with unlawfully forcing someone to labor against their will or desire. Such a person can be punished with imprisonment which can be extended to 1 year or fine or both.⁶

• SECTION 370
  Whomever imports, exports, removes, buys, sells, or disposes of any person as a slave, or accepts, receives, or detains any person as a slave against his will, will be punished by imprisonment of either kind for a duration up to seven years, as well as a fine.⁷

THE IMMORAL TRAFFIC [PREVENTION] ACT, 1956

This act was passed by the parliament of India in 1956 and the main objective or purpose of this act is to prevent commercial sex or immoral traffic among women and girls. This act covers the entire country. This act defines a brothel as a “house or any portion of the house, room or any portion of any room, conveyance or portion of any conveyance, and place or portion of any place.” And prostitution is “the sexual exploitation or abuse of persons for commercial purposes or consideration in money or any other kind.” In this act, if any person runs a brothel or aid in such activities then he or she will be punishable with imprisonment for one year which can be extended to 3 years, and a fine of rupees 2000 can also be imposed. If any tenant knowing allows them to use the property for such use then he or she can be imprisoned for two years and a fine of rupees 2000 can also be imposed on them.

THE ANTI TRAFFICKING BILL, 2021

This bill focuses on the prevention of human trafficking, providing rehabilitation cure compensation to the victims, and providing stringent punishments for the traffickers. The early bill of 2018 was never introduced in the Lok Sabha. The 2021 bill is different from the previous bill as it also extends outside India. In this bill, the national investigation agency will also be set up. This will also include transgenders along with women and children in the definition of a victim. The central government will also set up a national anti-trafficking committee and many committees will be set up at state and district levels for the better implementation of rules and regulations.

CASE LAWS

PEOPLE’S UNION FOR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS VS UNION OF INDIA
In this case, the people’s union of democratic rights filed a writ petition before the supreme court of India under Article 32 of the Indian constitution for the violation of fundamental rights and certain rights for laborers.⁸ People union of democratic rights is an organization set up to make a report on the exploitation of living conditions of laborers under contractors. In this case, the court defined forced labor under article 23, forced labor basically means employing labor and providing them wages which is less than the minimum wage rate. In this case, the court held that forced labor is a violation of the fundamental right of article 23 and the person can file a writ petition under Article 32 for the violation of their fundamental rights.⁹

LAXMI KANT PANDEY VS UNION OF INDIA
In this case, a writ petition was filed by Laxmi Kant Pandey regarding the malpractices in adopting children from foreign parents. This case brings to highlight the need for having rules and regulations regarding intercountry adoptions. The children go to another country and get neglected by their adopted parents, making a toxic and unhealthy environment for the children and resulting in sexual exploitation. To proving protection to the intercountry adopted children a comprehensive framework was formed. In this it was decided that the international adoptions would follow the regulations of the guardians and wards act, 1860 and the provisions of articles 15[3], 24, and 39 along with the united nations declaration on the rights of the child. It was made mandatory for foreigners to be sponsored by the licensed agencies of their country.¹⁰

GAURAV JAIN VS UNION OF INDIA
In this case, the public interest litigation was filed before the supreme court by the advocate to set up a distinct education system for the children of prostitutes and get them educated so that they didn’t have to live undesirable and the life full of misery. The court held that having separate schools for the children of prostitutes will isolate them and will be against the well-being of the children and society in general. The supreme court set up a committee consisting of advocates and social workers to look into the matter and find solutions. The court held that the prostitutes are not offenders but they are the victim of unfavorable socio-economic conditions and to set up juvenile homes for the rehabilitation and the safety of children.¹¹

CONCLUSION

There are many provisions related to human trafficking which are both domestically and globally recognized but still, there are numerous cases of human trafficking in our country. Human trafficking violated fundamental rights and constitutional rights and human rights of the people just for the sake of earning monetary benefits. Women and children are the victims of human trafficking people take advantage of the innocent behavior of the children and get them involved in sexual exploitation. In a country where there are fewer jobs for more people applying they are left unemployed and for the need for money women are forced to take up prostitution. Making laws and provisions is not enough this is an issue of great concern and it is needed to be seen from a socio-economic perspective also. The government should provide them with jobs so that they can live with dignity and comfort. Awareness related to human trafficking should be spread in schools among students. High-quality education should be promoted in government schools and colleges. This is a grave crime and needed to be lookup at in creating a safe and healthy environment for children and women to live in.

References:

1. The Indian constitution, 1950, art.23
2. The Indian constitution,1950, Art 21
3. Indian constitution, 1950,Art 51A[E]
4. Indian Penal Code, 1860, section 366 A
5. Indian penal code, 1860, Section 366B
6. Indian penal code, 1860 section 374
7. Indian penal code, 1860 section 370
8. Indian constitution,1950,Art.32
9. People union of democratic rights vs union of India, [1982 AIR 1473]
10. Laxmi Kant Pandey vs Union of India, [[1984 AIR 469]
11. Gaurav Jain vs Union of India, [{1997} 8 SCC 114]

This article is written by Prerna Pahwa, a student of Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, New Delhi.

Gender diversity widens the range of skills and backgrounds available to handle specific legal difficulties in any professional situation. Diversity serves a greater function in the legal profession: it lends legitimacy to the impression that the law system is equal and just, and that everyone’s views are represented and acknowledged within it.

INTRODUCTION

Lawyers (also known as advocates, barristers, attorneys, solicitors, or legal counselors), paralegals, legal scholars (including feminist legal theorists), prosecutors (also known as Crown Prosecutors or District Attorneys), judges, law professors, and law school deans are among the women who work in the legal profession.

In recent years, the importance of women in professional fields has been emphasized in order for the economy and society to reach their full potential. Gender equality became a standard for development and prosperity around the world. Women have shown themselves and are leading the way in their drive for financial independence, equal rights, and opportunity in a variety of sectors.

In India, an increasing number of women are graduating with a law degree, despite the fact that few appear to pursue the field after a short – term at a law firm. Many women leave the field because of gender prejudice and seek work in fields that are more tolerant of women. Nonetheless, there are success stories in the country’s legal profession, where women have indeed been tenacious and stubborn in attaining their goals and becoming respected professionals despite all odds.

INDIA

In India, men have long dominated the legal profession. Women’s admittance into the courts was only possible after long and drawn-out legal fights, but even then, female participation in the courts was minor until the late twentieth century. However, in the twenty-first century, the concept of globalization has created greater chances for Indian women in law education and training. Modernism has also tempered the courtroom environment but has also put a stop to medieval masculine chauvinism in the field.

In independent India, the Indian Constitution guaranteed citizens the right to equality including protection from discrimination based on gender in getting an education or practicing whatever career of their choosing. Despite this privilege, the legal profession has not become a common choice for women, primarily because women must have a basic degree of education in order to be informed of these rights. And for a female population that was largely illiterate due to a variety of factors including poverty, restrictive social customs, strict caste restrictions, cultural practices prohibiting women from working outside their homes, and so on, higher education and pursuing a profession were dreams that the Independence era had managed to ignite, even if only in the shape of an awareness of being a downtrodden and suppressed part of the society largely contributing to the country’s development. Interestingly, in Western nations where the journey and naval enterprise had brought about tremendous change in housing conditions, in which feminism and modern feminist movements were started by educated women, and which nations had such a literate female population, at the very least, women entered the legal profession in 1917. By the 1860s, the British had created schools, colleges, even universities for women in India, but many women couldn’t even imagine going to school or graduating until the 1920s. Though a few fortunate educated women, including doctors and authors, earned notoriety in the feminist movements of the time, it is clear that they faced a new foe in the European and British feminists that opted to define and, by definition, silence them. It became critical for them (educated Indian women, that is) to understand how and where to empower themselves in order to prevent continued oppression.

PROGRESS

As a result, the women of India set out to cross a gulf that was bigger than that which their western counterparts had set out to cross. In such a diversified country like India, the arduous process of expanding literacy and raising awareness of women’s rights took a solid twenty years. Meanwhile, even the Indian judiciary was proactive in encouraging women to enter the legal profession, appointing the very first woman judge to the Kerala High Court, Hon’ble Justice Anna Chandy. Justice Anna Chandy began her legal career as an advocate in 1929 and was promoted to Munsiff in 1937, making her the very first woman judge in pre-independence India.

During these two decades, two distinguished lawyers, Hon’ble Justice Fathima Beevi Honble and Hon’ble Justice Leila Seth, joined the legal profession and went on to become Chief Justices of the Himachal Pradesh and Kerala High Courts, respectively. For more than 15 years, the first had been an active practicing lawyer in the Delhi, Kolkata, and Patna High Courts, while the latter had climbed from the post of Munsiff to eventually retire as a Supreme Court Judge. Surprisingly, women’s representation in the judiciary has not increased significantly compared to the original number of female judges. The situation has deteriorated to the point where a demand for a 33 percent reservation for women in the judicial system has been made in order to achieve parity in the number of male and female judges.

WOMEN IN LAW

Journalism, academia, and medicine were among the first occupations to be influenced by feminism. In later years, feminism began to have an impact on professions previously controlled by men, such as surgery, civil service, law, management, entrepreneurship, and politics.

In recent years, every family, especially those from the orthodox, backward, and traditional sectors, has been under severe economic strain. The battle is no longer focused on external challenges. In addition, public opinion is no longer antagonistic, and women now have a plethora of options. Psychological issues and the tussle between family and job, on the other hand, persist throughout their lives.

Women’s admittance into and increasing participation in the legal industry has become one of the most notable societal transformations in recent times, often referred to as “revolutionary. This inflow of women has sparked a lot of discussion among scholars and political activists concerning the changes that women will bring to the structure and management of substantive law, and also the manner law is practiced. India was a British colony until 1947, and the British modified the administrative structure and organizations as they saw fit. The Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Criminal Penal Code (Cr PC), and the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), as well as the foundation of the Rule of Law and the Indian Civil Services, are just a few examples.

For the first time in India, Dr. Hari Sigh Gaur, a pioneer in the struggle for women’s admittance into the legal profession, moved the following amendment to the Central Legislative Assembly of India’s resolution to abolish the sex disqualification against women.

REPRESENTATION NEEDED

Women are increasingly represented in the legal profession around the world, but their success varies greatly by culture and country.

Women began to flood into the legal industry globally in the 2000s, per a 2013 report of 86 countries (covering 80% of the world’s population). Women’s representation in the law is lowest in India and China, while it is highest in the former Soviet Bloc countries, Latin America, and Europe.

According to the survey, 52 countries had greater than 30% representation among employed lawyers, which is considered a significant societal shift. Venezuela and Uruguay were early adopters, exceeding the threshold in the early 1980s. Women made up at least 50% of lawyers in Bulgaria, Latvia, Poland, and Romania by the mid-to-late 2000s—some of the greatest participation in the world—while Denmark, Norway, the United States, and Germany, were latecomers, crossing the 30% threshold at the same time. Meanwhile, the world’s two biggest countries are among the slowest to incorporate women: India has a 5% female representation in the practice of law, while China has a 20% female representation.

In 2021, CJI Ramana confessed that the legal profession has yet to accept women into its fold, as the bulk of them struggle inside the profession, during a valedictory ceremony sorted by the Bar Council of India (BCI).
“Following 75 years of freedom, one would expect to see at least 50% female representation at any and all levels, but I’m afraid I have to say that we’ve only managed to get to 11% female representation on the Supreme Court bench. Because of the reserve policy, some states may have a higher representation. However, the reality is that the law must continue to embrace women into its ranks “The Chief Justice stated.

Many law companies are also biased against women for the same reasons: she may take time off to raise a family, she cannot be entrusted with “serious” briefs, and if she requires a while off to start families, she is perceived as less capable and devoted. When a woman re-enters the workforce, she is frequently at a disadvantage.

Increasing women judges don’t really inevitably contribute to better results for women’s causes, according to a feminist judgment study conducted in the United Kingdom in 2010. However, if the judge has been a feminist, the story would be different, and the outcome would be different in many circumstances. As a result, India requires not only more female judges but also more gender-sensitive judges.

Women are likewise pressured to do better than their male counterparts, and women lawyers or judges who struggle to get their views heard are frequently referred to as aggressive. However, in male legal practitioners, this feature is viewed as a strength. Then there’s the issue of workplace harassment, which is mostly unaddressed. Because of the opaque character of our higher judiciary, this type of intimidation and harassment is widely overlooked. While arguing cases, there have been countless incidents of women lawyers being verbally harassed by their male peers. There are some states, like Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh, and Himachal Pradesh, that do not even have a single woman judge in the high courts. Only approximately 15% of the 1.7 million advocates registered with the bar councils are women.

CONCLUSION

The Indian legal system is indeed not the same as before a decade ago, and the numerous developments occurring inside it as a result of technological advancements and changes in working styles would necessitate a period of absorption before further advancements can be recognized. Developing e-courts in India would growth improve the justice delivery method, and the ease of being willing to debate online from the Advocate’s office may entice Indian women advocates to begin practicing or teaching over the internet. The desire to become a judge continues to entice Advocates and lawyers, however, the number of female Justices has not grown in comparison to male Judges throughout the years.

Women in the practice of law, on the other hand, must be more active. They should get together to address workplace challenges of gender discrimination. There are many female lawyers who may lead such organizations, and while numbers alone may not be enough to make a difference, there is power in numbers. Several gender-friendly adjustments to the law have been enacted in recent years by the courts. However, it must now look internally and embrace the gender disparities in the profession, as well as the fact that as a result, it’s really clearly losing the expertise of many outstanding women.

This article is written by Tingjin Marak, a BA/LLB student at Ajeenkya DY Patil University Pune.

ABSTRACT

The article seeks to discuss and elaborate on the crimes committed against women through the lens of the Indian Penal Code.

INTRODUCTION

Indian Penal Code is a comprehensive code that integrates and codifies the criminal law of India. The Code prescribes punishment for offenses committed within India. IPC was basically the brainchild of the English government. The first law commission of India¹, which was established by the Charter Act of 1833, steered the drafting of IPC, under the tutelage of Thomas Macaulay in 1834. The drafting of the code was completed in 1850 and was presented to the Imperial Legislative Council in 1856 which was ultimately enacted by the Imperial Council on 6th October 1860. The Criminal Code was initially enforced only upon selected Indian States. However, after the Independence of India, the ambit of the act was gradually widened and it covered the entire Indian territory except for the State of Jammu and Kashmir, wherein, after the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act 2019, the IPC came into force. The IPC is divided into 23 chapters, spanning 511 exhaustive sections. Each Chapter of IPC deals with a separate category of offense in the most elaborative and fastidious fashion.

Women are the building blocks of any society. They are synonymous with empathy, motherhood, empowerment, and development. However, like the men and children and other sections of society, the women too need the constitutional and legislative safeguard to protect their interests. Women, as a quintessential section of Indian society, have been vulnerable to myriad crimes. The patriarchal mindset of Indian society coupled with inequity and physical fragility, have jeopardized the interests of women.

IPC serves as an effective tool to serve the interests of all the sections of the society, especially the women, and thereby in that furtherance, categorically lays down descriptive code to punish the people for their crimes. It addresses some of the most rudimentary and fundamental issues concerning the safety of women in everyday life in length and breadth.

PROVISIONS OF IPC THAT DEAL WITH CRIME AGAINST WOMEN²

In order to proceed further, it is to be noted that Section 10 of IPC describes ‘women’ as female human beings of any age group.

1. OFFENCES AFFECTING LIFE

• Section 304B of IPC: Dowry Death.
  It prescribes that if the death of a woman is caused within 7 years of marriage due to bodily injury or burns and it could be shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty by her husband or his relative, then such death would be deemed as dowry death and the punishment for the same would be imprisonment for a minimum term of 7 years, which could be extended to imprisonment for life.

2. OFFENCES INVOLVING MISCARRIAGE AND INJURY TO THE UNBORN BABIES

• Section 313:
  Miscarriage without Consent: Causation of miscarriage of a woman without her consent and good faith is punishable with a term of up to 10 years or with a fine, or both
• Section 315:
  Any act done explicitly and not done in good faith, leading to the death of a child after birth or preventing it from being born alive is punishable with a term of up to 10 years and a fine.

3. OFFENCES CAUSING HURT

• 326A: Voluntary Causing Of Hurt With The Use Of Acid
  Voluntary causation of grievous hurt by throwing/administering acid, that leads to permanent or partial deformity/ damage to any body part of the victim is punishable with a minimum term of 10 years which could extend up to life imprisonment and with fine
• 326B: Attempting To Throw Acid
  Any attempt to throw or administer acid to any person leading to permanent or partial deformity of any body part is punishable with a term ranging from 5 to 7 years and with a fine.

4. OFFENCES INVOLVING USE OF CRIMINAL FORCE AND ASSAULT

• Section 354: Outraging Modesty Of Women
  Intentional use of criminal force (assault) to outrage or likely to outrage the modesty of women is punishable with a term not less than 1 year, which may extend up to 5 years, and a fine.
• Section 354A: Sexual Harassment Of Woman
  Sexual harassment of women by physically touching her, making sexually colorable remarks/ expressions, showing pornography against her will, demanding sexual favors is punishable with a term ranging from 1 year to 3 years or fine or both.
• Section 354B: Use Of Force To Disrobe Women
  Use of criminal force to disrobe a woman or compel her to be naked is punishable with a term ranging from years to 7 years or fine or both.
• Section 354C: Punishment For Voyeurism
  To capture an image or watch women engaging in the private act where women would reasonably expect privacy is a punishable offense wherein the offender is liable with a term of up to 3 years of fine or both.
• Section 354D: Punishment For Stalking A Woman
  Stalking a woman by contacting or following her, or attempting to develop personal interaction against the will of the woman, except in cases of discharging legal or public duty, is punishable with a term of up to 3 years and a fine, which may extend up to 5 years.

5. OFFENCES RELATED TO ABDUCTION/KIDNAPPING

• Section 366A and Section 366B
  Both these sections deal with the procuration of a minor girl under the age of 18 years from any part of India or abroad respectively for the purpose of forcing her into illicit intercourse with another person is punishable for a term of up to 10 years and with a fine.
• Section 370
  Trafficking of a person by means of force, fraud, abduction, inducement, threat, or force for the purpose of exploitation of the victim with or without its consent is punishable for a term ranging from 7 years up to life imprisonment along with a fine, depending upon the grievousness of the situation and crime.
• Section 372 and Section 373
  Selling and buying of minors respectively for the purposes of above Sections, under the age of 18 years for the purpose of prostitution is punishable with imprisonment for a term of up to 10 years and fine.

6. OFFENCES INVOLVING SEXUAL CRIMES

• Section 375: Definition Of Rape
  This section defines rape. Rape is committed if a man applies his mouth or penetrates his penis/ any object or into mouth, vagina, urethra, or anus; or manipulates any body part of a woman so as to facilitate penetration against the will of the woman or with her consent by coercing/ putting her under fear/ deceiving her to be her lawful husband or under intoxication or when she is under 18 years of age.
• Section 376: Punishment For Rape
  Rape is punishable with a minimum term of at least 10 years and with a fine that may extend up to life imprisonment. Rape by police officers, public servants, members of armed forces, jail staffs, hospital staff, staff of remand home, persons exercising fiduciary relationship, is punishable with rigorous imprisonment of five to ten years, extending to imprisonment for natural life along with fine.
• Section 376A: Punishment For Rape Resulting In Death
  This Section deals with punishment for causing death or persistently vegetative state of the victim due to rape. The offender will be liable with imprisonment of a minimum of 20 years which shall extend up to life imprisonment or even with death.
• Section 376AB
  Raping a woman under 12 years of age shall result in imprisonment of at least 20 years and with a fine, which may extend up to life imprisonment or with death.
• Section 376B
  Rape by husband upon his wife during the period of the decree of separation shall be punished with a term of at least 2 years, extendable up to 7 years, and with a fine.
• Section 376C
  Rape committed by people in authority, public servants, or by those in a fiduciary relationship, or by management of a hospital or by jail staff, shall be liable to be punished with imprisonment of a minimum of 5 years, which may extend up to 10 years, and with fine.
• Section 376D: Prescribes Punishment For Gangrape
  Rape committed by two or more men acting in furtherance of common intention shall be punishable with imprisonment of not less than 20 years which may extend up to life imprisonment.
• Section 376DA
  Rape of girls under sixteen years of age is punishable with imprisonment of a minimum of twenty years extending to imprisonment for natural life along with a fine.
• Section 376E: Prescribes Punishment For Repeat Offenders
  A person committing rape, who has been previously convicted of rape under Section 376, 376A-D, shall be punishable with imprisonment of life.

8. OFFENCES INVOLVING COMMITMENT OF CRUELTY BY HUSBAND UPON HIS WIFE

• Section 498A
  Cruelty includes the acts of harassment by the husband or his relative that is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb, or health; or any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security. The husband or his relative who subjects such women to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with a fine.

CONCLUSION

Even in this 21st century, where the technological advancements and the cogent changes in the perception of the moral standards of Indian society have revolutionized our way of life, women continue to be subjected to multitudes of crimes every day. IPC as a criminal code provides the basic framework for legislative penal actions. It serves as a foundation and paves way for the introduction and enactment of specific women-centric legislative pieces to exhaustively address the issues of women and chalk out the way forward.

References:

1. Historical Introduction to IPC (PDF)
2. https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1860-45.pdf

This article is written by Riya Ganguly, 2 nd year BBA LLB student at Bharati Vidyapeeth New Law College, Pune.

Bench

By Hon’ble Justice Mr. Deepak Gupta and By Hon’ble Justice Mr. Aniruddha Bose

Advocates

Pritha Srikumar, Arunima Kedia (Appellant Side) & B.V. Balaram Das, Hrishikesh Baruah (Respondent’s Side)

Cases Referred

Dr. Subhramanium Swamy And Ors vs Raju through the Member Juvenile Justice [, SC (2014) 8 SCC 390]

Factual Observations

• A juvenile ‘X’, aged 16 to 18, is accused of committing an offense punishable under section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)¹, which carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment or up to ten years in prison and a fine in the first part and up to ten years in prison and a fine in the second part.
• The deceased in the car accident was the appellant’s brother. The Juvenile was between the ages of 16 and 18 at the time of the incident. The appeal to the Children’s Court was similarly turned down. Following that, the juvenile ‘X’ sought the High Court of Delhi through his mother, who ruled that because no minimum term had been set for the offense in question, it did not fall under the purview of section 2 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The deceased’s sister has now filed an appeal before the Supreme Court.
• Heinous, petty, and serious transgressions are defined in sections 2(33), 2(45), and 2(54). In the IPC or any other legislation in force, heinous offenses are those for which the sentence imposed is a minimum of 7 years in prison or more.
• Siddharth Luthra, counsel for the appellant, pointed out to the Court that the Juvenile Justice Act has left out the fourth category of offenses for which the minimum sentence is less than 7 years, or for which no minimum sentence is prescribed but the maximum sentence can be more than 7 years, including homicide not amounting to murder (offense of present case). He persuaded the Court to remove the word “minimum” from the definition of heinous crimes, allowing all crimes to be categorized as “heinous crimes” with the exception of minor and serious offenses.
• Furthermore, he argued that leaving out the fourth category of charges would result in absurdity, which could not have been the legislature’s objective.
• Mukul Rohtagi, a skilled senior attorney for the Juvenile, contended that the Court could not amend the law. He stated that the Court could not interpret the legislature’s meaning since a category of offenses was left out and that the Court could not interfere to close the gap in the Act.

Issues Raised

1. What does Section 2(33) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 mean and how is it interpreted?
2. What is the uncertainty created by the word “minimum” in the Statute, and how is it interpreted?
3. How can a juvenile be treated under a category of an offense that is not defined in the statute but that the appellant argues should be included as an offense?

Contentions

APPELLANT

• The appellant claimed that there was one type of crime that was not addressed in the Act of 2015, claiming that heinous crimes are those that carry a “minimum” sentence of seven years or more.
• The unincluded category, it was said, would introduce absurdity, which the Legislature did not intend. The argument was that the Act had a gap in it that generated ambiguity and, as a result, did not specify anything.
• It was also claimed that the word “includes” was used in the definition of “heinous offenses”² implying that the definition is inclusive and encompasses things not mentioned in the definition.

RESPONDENT

• The appearing counsel argued that the Court was not in a position to rewrite the legislation and that the Court could not deduce the Legislature’s intent only based on an unincluded category of offenses.
• Even if the court had to fill the gap in the Act, it was claimed that this was not practicable in this case.

Difference of Opinion B/W Lower Court and SC

The crucial question before the court was whether the youngster should be tried as an adult or not. In this case, the child was over the age of 16 but under the age of 18 when he committed the offense.

Juvenile Justice Board– Because the youngster committed an offense under the definition of a ‘serious’ offense, the Juvenile Justice Board ordered that he be punished as an adult. The mother of the kid then petitions the High Court because the sentence for the offense was not passed under Section 2 (33) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

High Court– High Court stated that if a kid has committed any heinous offense such as rape or murder, which is punished for more than 7 years, a punishment similar to that given to an adult can be imposed. The order was found to be inconsistent, prompting an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court– It was determined that this Act does not apply to the fourth category of offenses, which are penalized for more than seven years but do not include a minimum sentence or a sentence of fewer than seven years. As a result, under the context of this Act, this is referred to as a “serious offense”. This type of issue is to be dealt with according to this procedure unless the Parliament itself deals with it.

Judgment of SC

Luthra’s submission reasoned that it was not the Court’s responsibility to fill in the gaps and fix them. The Court stated that if the legislature’s purpose was clear, it might add or remove terms from the Act. However, in cases where the legislature’s intent is uncertain, the Court cannot add or remove words to provide meaning that the Court deems fit into the scheme of things. The Court was interpreting a statute, which had to be construed following its wording and intent.

The Court dismissed the appeal by resolving the issue and ruling that an offense that does not carry a minimum penalty of seven years cannot be considered terrible. The Act, however, does not address the fourth category of offenses, namely, offenses where the maximum sentence is more than seven years in prison but no minimum sentence or a minimum sentence of fewer than seven years is provided, shall be treated as ‘serious offenses’³ within the meaning of the Act and dealt with accordingly until Parliament takes a call on the matter.

Unless the Parliament acts with it, this type of matter must be dealt with using this approach. It was decided that the Legislature’s objective does not have to be the same as the judge believes it should be. When the statute’s wording is obvious but the Legislature’s intent is ambiguous, the Court cannot add or remove terms from the statute to give it a meaning that the Court believes fits into the scheme of things. However, if the Legislature’s aim is obvious, the Court can see behind the statute’s inartistic or clunky wording and determine the problem that must be handled under the code’s objectives. The court also ordered the High Court to remove the child’s name from the Child in Conflict with the Law registry. As a result, the case was resolved in favor of the child.

Ratio Decidendi:

The rationale or the ratio decidendi is one of the crucial aspects in analyzing the mindset behind a judgment. According to Section 14 of The Children Act, 1960, If the child offender has committed a heinous crime, the Juvenile Justice Board must conduct a preliminary examination to determine the child’s mental and physical capacity to commit the crime, as well as the child’s ability to comprehend the consequences of the crime and the circumstances in which the crime was allegedly committed. The Board has the authority to enlist the assistance of experienced psychologists, psychosocial workers, or other field experts. The statement makes it clear that the preliminary assessment will not focus on the trial’s merits or the child’s allegations.

Further, under section 15 of The Children Act, 1960 –
(1) There is a need to try the child as an adult under the provisions of the Code of Criminal The procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), and pass appropriate orders after trial, subject to the provisions of this section and section 21, taking into account the child’s special needs, the tenets of a fair trial, and maintaining a child-friendly environment;
(2) There is no requirement for the child to be tried as an adult, and the Board may conduct an inquiry and issue appropriate directions in accordance with section 18. (2) In the case of a child in conflict with the law, the Children’s Court shall ensure that the final order includes an individual care plan for the child’s rehabilitation, including follow-up by the probation officer, the District Child Protection Unit, or a social worker.

In Dr. Subhramanium Swamy And Ors vs Raju through the Member Juvenile Justice…, on 28 March 2014⁴, only one of the five people was not sentenced to death by the session court on March 28, 2014, according to the Member Juvenile Justice… In their appeal, the petitioners demanded that the juvenile be prosecuted and punished alongside the other four defendants. The first appeal, which was dismissed by the Delhi High Court, was filed. Another appeal was filed with the Supreme Court, but it was dismissed. As a result, Dr. Subhramanian Swamy’s application was denied by the Supreme Court. Furthermore, the court dismissed the victim’s parents’ writ suit.

Concluding Observations:

After analyzing the situation in the instant case, while acknowledging that the court cannot legislate, the reasoning of the bench that if it did not address the issue, the Boards would have no guidance on how to deal with children who have committed fourth-category offenses is concluded to be to the point. The court stated, “Since two viewpoints are feasible, we would prefer to choose the one that is in favor of children.” The bench, therefore, invoked its authority under Article 142 of the Constitution to order that, as of the date the 2015 Act took effect, all children who committed fourth-category offenses to be treated in the same way as children who committed serious offenses. Still, there is a need to make some serious amendments in the BOOKS OF JUSTICE.

We all know the maxim ‘Salum Populi Suprema Lex’ which means ‘the welfare of the society is the supreme law’, but unfortunately the court failed to apply the same in the recent case. I believe that sending the accused to a reform center will not affect him because his parents, who were aware of his repeated infractions, did nothing to stop him and may be able to “buy the system completely.” I personally feel that these verdicts by the Apex Court only encourage teenagers to become criminals and nothing else. A perfect example of the same is NIRBHAYA CASE.

References:

1. Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860: Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder
2. Defined in Section 2(33) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
3. Defined in Section 2(54) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
4. Dr. Subhramanium Swamy And Ors vs Raju through the Member Juvenile Justice, SC (2014) 8 SCC 390.

Analysis by Hemant Bohra student at School of Law, Lovely Professional University, Punjab.

Whenever one’s right is wronged, it is imperative that there is always some way to remedy that sufferance or injury caused to that person, to bring back the conviction of being just in a just society. It is done to bring about that same level of equilibrium prior to the right being wronged, the damage and injury caused. One can use the imagination of a scenario where one is wronged and has suffered some type of damage but if there was no remedy, the sufferings of that person would be prolonged, contributing to lack of peace and hence rendering the society’s system as being ineffective. If there is no relief, it would only lead to pent-up frustration and a feeling of insecurity. There would be constant feelings of apprehension due to a lack of guarantee of restoration, which would have been an important tool to the path of peace and security. Hence, the concept of torts came into the practice for this very purpose; to restore the victim of the wrong to their previous position prior to that action that led to injury or damage.

INTRODUCTION OF TORT LAW

The beginning of the Law of Torts can be followed by Roman statute alterium non-laedere. The saying signifies “not to harm another” for example not to hurt anybody by deeds or words. This saying is like trustworthiness vivere which signifies “to live respectably” and suum inner circle tribuere which is disclosed as to deliver to each man that has a place with him or it is an overall articulation to give equity to every individual. This multitude of three sayings can be ascribed for the advancement of the Law of Torts.

The fundamental goals of tort law are to compensate affected parties for harms inflicted by others, to hold those responsible that caused such injury, and to deter others from harming others. Torts allow the degree of loss to be shifted from the party who was injured to the party who caused it. Typically, a person seeking remedies under tort law will seek monetary compensation in the form of damages.

Remedies that are not normally used are injunction and restitution. The common law, the system that India follows, and state statutory law set the limits of tort law. Judges have broad discretion in assessing which activities qualify as legally cognizable wrongs, which defenses may outweigh any particular claim and the appropriate measure of damages when interpreting statutes. There are variations in the tort law across states of a country. There are three types of torts- Intentional torts (e.g., purposefully hitting a person); negligent torts (e.g., creating an accident by failing to respect traffic laws); and recklessness torts (e.g., causing an accident by deliberately failing to obey traffic rules).

TORT LAW IN INDIA

Because tort law is comparable throughout common law jurisdictions, courts have frequently relied on case law from other common law jurisdictions, like the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada, in addition to local precedent. When applying foreign precedent, however, consideration is given to local norms and conditions, as well as India’s unique constitutional framework. The legislature has also enacted legislation to address specific societal issues. Aspects of tort law have been codified, as they have in other common law countries.

The Indian Penal Code or other criminal legislation may make some behavior that gives rise to a cause of action under tort law illegal. When a tort is also a criminal offense, the aggrieved party is nevertheless entitled to seek redress under tort law. The overlap between the two domains of law is due to the different purposes they serve and the different types of remedies they offer. Tort law tries to hold a tortfeasor accountable, therefore tort proceedings are taken directly by the aggrieved party to obtain damages, but criminal law intends to punish and discourage conduct that is regarded to be against the interests of society, so criminal actions are conducted by the government.

As in other common law jurisdictions, tort law in India is primarily guided by court precedent, reinforced with statutes governing damages, codifying common law torts, and civil procedure. A tort, just like other common law jurisdictions, is a breach of a non-contractual duty that causes harm to the plaintiff and gives rise to a civil cause of action with a remedy. Because the reason for tort law is to provide a solution to the individual who has been hurt, if a remedy is not present, it will be considered that a tort has not been committed.

Despite the fact that Indian tort law is largely inherited from English law, there still are distinctions between the two systems. Indian tort law is unique in that it provides remedies for constitutional torts, which are government activities that infringe on constitutional rights, as well as an absolute liability system for enterprises involved in hazardous conduct.

So, considering that the basic rule of torts is to compensate the value corresponding to the damage or injury caused, how is such a practice calculated? In India, damages are based on the principle of restitutio ad integrum. In all circumstances, India uses a compensatory approach and argues for “full and fair compensation.”

The Indian court will seek similar cases to compare when assessing the number of damages. The multiplier approach, which awards compensation corresponded to the degree of compromise to the victim’s earning power, is used in India to calculate damages in tort cases.

The fair and just amount refers to the number of years’ purchase upon which loss of reliance is capitalized under the multiplier technique. Then, in order to account for future uncertainty, a reduction in the multiplier would also have to be made. Under the Motor Vehicle Act, the multiplier concept is enshrined in the statute for tortious proceedings that involve personal injuries that have been caused by motor vehicles. The court will, however, take inflation into consideration when determining damages.

Now, in case of calculating personal injuries, in tort lawsuits involving personal injury, Indian jurisprudence recognizes seven distinct forms of harm where damages may be awarded. These categories are known as heads of claim, and they can be separated into non-pecuniary and pecuniary, similar to the more general distinction established in other common law jurisdictions between economic and non-economic damages. The following financial grounds of claim are recognized by Indian tort law:

• Earnings are lost.
• Expenses for nursing care, hospital, and medical.
• Matrimonial prospects are dwindling.

The following non-monetary heads of claim are recognized by contemporary Indian jurisprudence:

• Loss of hope for the future.
• Loss of luxuries or the ability to enjoy life.
• Physiological function loss or impairment.
• Suffering and pain.

INTENTIONAL TORTS

Intentional torts are harms that the defendant has had the intentions to do or should have had an expectation to occur as a result of his or her action or omissions. When the defendant’s such acts or omissions were unreasonably dangerous, they are called negligent torts. Unlike deliberate and torts of negligence, torts of strict liability are unaffected by the defendant’s level of care. Instead, in these situations, the courts look to see if a specific result or injury occurred.

Some moves should be made with a reason to submit a deliberate misdeed and wrong, for example, an intention is a must for an act to be committed. It is fundamental that there is a psychological component.

The Supreme Court declared in the State of Maharashtra versus M.H. George that criminal intent is a psychological truth that must be proven even in cases involving exceptional conduct unless it is clearly ruled out or ruled out by whatever necessary inference.

That is because Mens rea, or the purpose to commit a criminal act knowing the negative consequences, is one of the most fundamental elements of a crime. Mens rea is expressed by the use of phrases like intention, malice, fraud, irresponsibility, and so on. Before committing an offense, one must be a guilty mind. Mens rea include what the person is intending to do and the refusal to perform anything that is demanded of you. The mere intent to commit a crime is illegal in and of itself. An accused will be found guilty if it is proven that he intended to commit the crime, however, the burden of proving it is on the other side, and there must be sufficient evidence to decide that intention exists.

In Ramachandra Gujar’s case, the court held that a person’s intention may only be inferred from their actions and that the likely consequences of such actions must also be considered.

NEGLIGENCE TORTS

Negligence is a type of civil tort that occurs when a person violates his duty of care to another, causing that other person to suffer harm or face legal consequences. In tort law, negligence can take the following forms, that is, a method of committing various torts such as trespassing or causing a nuisance. It can be considered as a separate tort by itself.

Negligence’s Essentials
The plaintiff must show that the defendant had a duty of care that was owed to him and that this duty was breached. The nature of negligence liability is strictly legal, does not have to be moral or religious. ‘Duty’ might be seen as a responsibility to be cautious of others.

Duty Violation: The second stage is to prove that there was an actual breach of duty once the first criterion has been demonstrated. The defendant is expected to perform his responsibilities in a rational manner. The deciding factor is whether or not the defendant exercised reasonable caution.

Damage: The plaintiff must have suffered some loss as a result of the defendant’s breach of duty. The case of Donoghue v Stevenson represents a watershed moment in the history of the tort of negligence. The plaintiff, in this case, went to a cafe to order a ginger beer, that was sealed with an opaque cork. When the contents of the bottle were emptied, a decaying body of a snail emerged. The plaintiff became ill as a result of consuming some of the tainted contents of the bottle.

The court determined that a manufacturer that manufactures a product for the end consumer on the basis that the consumer will be injured if the manufacturer fails to exercise reasonable care, does owe a duty of care to the plaintiff.

RECKLESSNESS

A person’s actions might sometimes be so rash that they become the subject of a criminal investigation or a lawsuit. If a person acts recklessly with complete disregard for the safety of others and has the knowledge or should that his activities may cause injury to others, he may be held accountable for the injuries produced by his actions. It suggests the person was aware (or should have been aware) that his or her actions had the potential to damage others.

Recklessness is defined as behavior that is less than intentional but more than mere negligence. Unlike negligence, which occurs when a person takes an action with a risk that they should have known about, recklessness refers to taking a risk knowingly.

For example, the Supreme Court has defined what constitutes criminal culpability and differentiated between recklessness, negligence, and rashness. A person is said to have acted negligently when he or she accidentally commits an act or omission that would cause a breach of his or her legal duty, according to the law. A person who has done rashly when he or she is aware of the consequences but stupidly believes that they will not materialize as a result of his or her actions. A careless person is aware of the repercussions yet is unconcerned about whether or not they are the result of his or her actions. ‘Any behavior that is not adequate to recklessness and wilful wrongdoing shall not be subject to criminal prosecution,’ the Court stated in Poonam Verma VS. Ashwin Patel.

Many risky activities are prohibited by state law, and irresponsible actors are viewed as social risks because they jeopardize the safety of others. A person who has been hurt as a result of another’s negligence may be entitled to compensation for medical bills, rehabilitation, pain, lost wages, and suffering. Furthermore, recklessness may allow compensation from those who are normally free from liability for simple negligence, like government employees and health care providers.

Recklessness is a subjective as well as objectively defined state of mind. There are two kinds of irresponsible behavior. The first examines what the performer knew or was thought to be thinking at the time of the act (subjective test). The second evaluates what a person with a reasonable mind in the defendant’s circumstances would have believed (objective test). In all cases, the question is whether the person was aware (or should have been aware) that his acts could injure someone else.

It is dangerous, for example, for a car driver to purposely cross a highway in violation of a stop sign if traffic is approaching from both directions. In comparison, he does not stop since his attention is diverted and he is unaware that he is approaching the crossing which otherwise would be considered negligent.

CONCLUSION

Tort law allows for not only full recompense for victims, but also for the revelation of wrongdoing and the discouragement of malicious or negligent acts. A verdict of the court can be spread all over the country, if not the world, and can result in harmful practices being changed or stopped. Tort law has progressed to level the playing field, having roots in English common law. It empowers those without resources to compete with anyone on the globe, not just direct action. Any multi-billion-dollar enterprise or overreaching government agency. Besides only compensating an injured sufferer, tort law offers further advantages. Automobiles, the roads, toys, and foods are safer.

Written by Tingjin Marak, a student at Ajeenkya DY Patil University, Pune.

Introduction

Over time, many changes occur in society; these changes have both beneficial and harmful consequences. As the nature of law evolves, new laws and amendments are introduced into society to regulate the violation of living beings’ rights, privacy, and security.

There’s a Bible proverb that goes something like this: “Either you can believe all of it or you can’t trust any of it,” and that’s how fake news spreads. If you can’t distinguish which news is real vs phony, which is truth vs lies, many people will quickly throw up their hands and declare that none of them can be trusted.

With the introduction of computers, the internet, social media, and networking websites, these developments, particularly on the technological front, became mass development with the introduction of computers, the internet, social media, and networking websites, which crept into and made their way into people’s lives.¹

The law of social changes as trends change. People are discovering new ways to conduct crimes in a high-tech manner as time progresses. However, by adopting new statutes and enactments, the law has broadened its jurisdiction and begun to remove these flaws from society. As a result, the Government of India has submitted a bill called the Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2019.

Fake News Prohibition Bill, 2019

The Fake News (Prohibition) Bill of 2019 was passed to make it illegal to create and distribute fake news in the media, as well as other related issues. In India, fake news refers to misinformation or disinformation conveyed by word of mouth and conventional media, as well as more recently through digital modes of communication such as altered videos, memes, unconfirmed adverts, and rumors circulated on social media. This statute applies to the entire country of India, it includes:

a) Misquotation of one’s remark is an example of fake news.
b) Altering audio and video files, causing facts and context to be distorted.
c) For the advantage of a person, agency, or entity.

Objectives of the Bill

Fake news has made it easier to spread false information in the era of the internet, where anybody can submit a report or a comment that appears to be a news item and declare it to be accurate and factual. Fake news or information must display or intend to exhibit propaganda to blacken or disgrace one’s reputation or create or plan to induce fear, division, turmoil, violence, or hate. Due to the propagation of fake news on social media platforms such as Whatsapp, Facebook, and Twitter, a huge number of mob lynching occurrences have been recorded around the country. Political parties were also discovered to be distributing misinformation on social media during the country’s elections, according to studies.

To control and the spread of fake news in any form, whether it is through circulation, sharing, misquotation of statements, editing of audio and video clips, fabricating content, undermining, sowing seeds of enmity, sedition, hatred, disseminate, edit, abet, etc., a debate took place in the House of Lok Sabha on the subject on February 8, 2019, and Shri. Tej Pratap Singh from Mainpuri proposed before the Hon’ble Chairperson to introduce The Indian media research organization CMS indicated in a report by The Guardian that the growth of false news was due to India’s “lack of (a) media strategy for verification.” Additionally, reporters and journalists have been imprisoned for “making false stories, “particularly when the pieces were contentious.

Fake News in India

In Alakh Alok Srivastava v. Union of India², the Supreme Court of India acknowledged the problem of infodemics in India and issued an order for state governments to follow the Centre’s orders to combat the threat of fake news. The top court also highlighted the necessity for the government of India to provide a daily bulletin through all media outlets as a source of real-time verifiable information on Covid-19 to alleviate the fear and apprehension generated by the uncontrolled flow of fake news.

The recent mass evacuation of migrant workers was caused, according to this petition, by the anxiety induced in the minds of the laborers as a result of bogus news that inflated the duration of the lockdown to endure for more than three months. Poor migrant laborers were killed as a result of this evacuation, which was brought about by the distribution of illicit information.

Fake news spread over WhatsApp in Odisha, claiming that a person from outside the state had been sick. After an inquiry, the police discovered that the claim was untrue. At the time, India lacks a specialized law to control false news; yet the epidemic is demonstrating the necessity for one.

Provisions of different laws in India

Information Technology Act, 2008 (IT Act)
In India, social media platforms that are classified as ‘intermediaries’ under Section 79(2)(c) of the Information Technology Act, 2008 are obligated to exercise due diligence when performing their tasks. Initially, under the Act and the April 2011 guidelines, intermediaries were not liable if they were not responsible for the origination, transmission, or reception of such content across their reach. As a result of this change, intermediaries gained protection, allowing them to be slackers in their efforts to combat bogus news.

When the government realized its error, it devised a remedy on the opposite extreme of the spectrum, instructing intermediaries to proactively block information. These restrictions have been compared to censorship in China. The government can use this as a political weapon to suppress stuff that does not benefit them. The free expression would be harmed by such a law.

Indian Penal Code (IPC)³
Section 505(1)(b) of the IPC deals with the dissemination of false and malicious material that causes fear or panic in the general public, or in any segment of the general public, with the intent of inducing an individual to commit an offense against the state or public peace. The offender under this section can be punished with imprisonment of a maximum of 6 years and a fine. Section 505(1)(b) combined with Section 54 of the DMA have been envisaged to include the expansion of fake news to a large extent.

The actual issue with fake news is fraudulent information that is disguised as real news in the form of unpaid pieces. The malice requirement might be avoided, and the spreader of misleading information could face severe responsibility and exemplary damages. The implementation of strict responsibility, on the other hand, would need tracking the disinformation back to its source, which has been recognized as a time-consuming and inefficient procedure.

Disaster Management Act, 2005 (DMA)⁴
Section 54 of the DMA professes to handle ‘false alarm or warning as to disaster or its severity or magnitude, leading to panic’ and this has been applied while recording arrests so far. It makes the offense punishable with imprisonment up to 1 year and the imposition of a fine. The same provision, on the other hand, has long been criticized for being too narrowly focused on catastrophes at a time when the breadth of false news is far broader.

While this one-of-a-kind characteristic of the Act restricts its use to disasters, it does have a good side effect. It ensures that the use of this clause does not extend beyond the extraordinary circumstances of a disaster, preventing the government from using it to further restrict free expression.

Curbing Fake News within Jurisprudence

Restriction of some rights can be permissible in the context of major public health hazards and public emergencies endangering the nation’s survival, according to international human rights law. The size and severity of the Covid-19 epidemic have elevated it to the status of public health danger, justifying limits on freedom of expression and speech. Such limits, however, must adhere to the standards of international human rights law. The same has been enshrined under Article 19(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)⁵ which requires the limitations to have a legal basis, to be solely significant, to be subject to review, and to be proportionate to acquire the aim. While it is vital to take steps to prevent the spread of disinformation, there is an unintended consequence. Efforts to combat false news might result in the imposition of censorship laws or the suppression of critical thinking that is essential to make educated judgments. To combat the spread of disinformation, Thailand’s government recently enacted restrictions that included a blanket prohibition on communications that are either “false” or “misleading”. The Thai government used this method to detain an artist who challenged the government’s reaction to the current public health crisis.

Concluding Observations

During this situation, it is critical to combat bogus news. It should not, however, come at the price of free expression. Temporary measures that take away some liberties in the near term but do not turn out to be a political weapon for any ruling administration are the way ahead in suppressing free expression. Temporary measures will allow the government to make necessary modifications to the current system to safeguard us. We should allow the government to protect us in our weak state, but this should not result in the government abusing our frailty. To combat the rapid spread of fake news, the government must collaborate with the public and intermediaries. We must do so; else, fake news may prove to be as deadly as the epidemic. Without a question, the problem of fake news and fake is growing like wildfire around the globe, necessitating the passage of legislation to regulate and restrict the transmission of fake news on social media and other platforms. The bill was constructed and prepared with the goal of prohibiting the transmission and distribution of false news, and thus “The Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2019” was created and presented to the Lok Sabha.

References:

1. Critical analysis of the Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2019, by Yogesh V Nayyar, Advocate in Supreme court. https://blog.ipleaders.in/critical-analysis-fake-news-prohibition-bill-2019/
2. ALAKH ALOK SRIVASTAVA v. UNION OF INDIA, Supreme Court Of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 76 Of 2018 | 01-05-2018 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/129422211/
3. THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ACT NO. 45 OF 1860 1* [6th October 1860.]
4. Disaster Management Act (DMA), Power to remove difficulties. [23rd December 2005.] https://www.ndmindia.nic.in/images/The%20Disaster%20Management%20Act,%202005.pdf
5. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171 https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html

Written by Hemant Bohra student at School of Law, Lovely Professional University, Punjab.