PhonePe is India’s leading digital payments platform with over 280 million registered users. Using PhonePe, users can send and receive money, recharge mobile, DTH, data cards, pay at stores, make utility payments, buy gold, and make investments. PhonePe went live for customers in August 2016 and was the first non-banking UPI app and offered money transfers to individuals and merchants, recharges and bill payments to begin with.
Job Title
Manager – Dispute Resolution & IPR
Role & Responsibilities
To set up a strong, proactive, and effective litigation prevention and resolution function with customer interest at the centre.
To establish a strong IPR practice – trademark /copyright registration, monitoring, and protection.
Develop a PAN India legal reach program to resolve consumer, civil and criminal cases effectively.
Merchant / Partner – recoveries /claim management as per contracts (Drafting Notices/Replies to third parties)
Legal support in case of detention/police custody/ filing FIR/others of employees on the ground (feet on the street across the country) – the ability to advise on legal strategy and action for on-ground support for timely legal resolution.
Develop a training program and preventive strategy to resolve disputes before they become an FIR, police complaint, or litigation/case.
Empanelment of the right set of law firms with PAN India presence for litigation, notice, and complaint handling.
Application for Trade-Mark, Copyright, filing oppositions, monitoring and assessment program of Company IPR. Executing infringement action directly or through law firms, attending to all court matters directly or through law firms. Coordination and briefing/discussion with external lawyers or legal firms, reviewing submissions, petitions, replies, and documents prepared by lawyers. Negotiate law firm contract terms, including TATs, reporting updates, etc.
Creation and maintaining a Litigation tracker with Mgmt. dashboard and reporting for one view of litigation risk map across the organization.
Support the HR department in handling employee-related disputes/claims.
Provide expert & strategic legal advice on various aspects of the business to management with litigation prevention, effective resolution, and customer centricity at the core.
Evaluate and weigh multiple inputs and impacts of any decision or course of action, ability to anticipate issues and estimate risks strategically, and identify proactive solutions that will eliminate or mitigate litigation risk.
Ideal Candidate (preferably from Bangalore)
Minimum qualification: LL.B / LLM
Minimum 7-10 years post-qualification experience with the right mix of self or firm /court practice and as in-house legal counsel in the financial services sector, payments industry (right exposure in civil, Arbitration (domestic & International), criminal areas and IPR infringement matters.
Have strong written communication and oratory skills. Good in drafting legal documents and interpreting of statutes.
Expectations other than qualification & technical experience
Committed and ready to work under constraints/ pressure.
Ready to travel with urgency and approach to address legal issues.
Ability to develop legal strategy and objectives, excellent knowledge and understanding of civil, criminal, and corporate law & procedures
Demonstrated ability to create legal defensive or proactive strategies
Well-versed in how businesses operate with financial acumen
High degree of professional ethics and integrity, Excellent judgment and analytical skills, good interpersonal skills
PhonePe Full Time Employee Benefits (Not applicable for Intern or Contract Roles)
Insurance Benefits – Medical Insurance, Critical Illness Insurance, Accidental Insurance, Life Insurance
Wellness Program – Employee Assistance Program, Onsite Medical Center, Emergency Support System
Parental Support – Maternity Benefit, Paternity Benefit Program, Adoption Assistance Program, Day-care Support Program
Mobility Benefits – Relocation benefits, Transfer Support Policy, Travel Policy
Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.
The jar is a savings app that helps its users save daily in the form of digital gold — we wish to help Indians rediscover the long-term benefits of habitual daily savings in an era where instant gratification is king. Jar was founded by Nishchay AG, former director and founding member at mobility start-up Bounce, and Misbah Ashraf, founder of community-focused e-commerce platform Marsplay.
Roles & Responsibilities
Vetting of NDA, service level agreements and other agreements as per the business requirement
Drafting and coordinating with internal teams for SOP and monthly tracker
Assisting the business with negotiating and closing contracts with clients/ potential clients
Ability to independently coordinate with internal and external stakeholders as may be necessary
Maintaining and periodically updating MIS trackers
Qualifications
Bachelor of Law with relevant experience of 0-6 months
Basic Knowhow regarding laws related to fintech laws, intellectual property law, corporate laws, and financial services is desirable
Excellent written and verbal communication skills
Outstanding organizational abilities and strong attention to detail
Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.
American University, Washington College of Law is seeking applications for a Visiting Professor in the Janet R. Spragens Federal Income Tax Clinic for the academic year 2023-24.
About Janet R. Spragens Federal Tax Clinic
The Janet R. Spragens Federal Tax Clinic is a single-semester clinic in which student attorneys represent low-income individuals who the Internal Revenue Service is auditing. They offer legal representation for clients before the IRS in appeals conferences and, if the cases do not settle, in U.S. Tax Court. The clinic includes both a lawyering seminar and a fieldwork component.
About the Clinical Program
American University’s in-house, “live-client” Clinical Program recently celebrated 50 years of programmatic excellence and is respected for its leadership in scholarship, development of clinical methodology, contributions to increasing access to justice for under-served clients, and breadth of offerings.
Eligibility
Minimum qualifications include a JD degree
Outstanding academic record
Three years experience as a lawyer and membership in a state bar.
Prior clinical teaching experience is preferred but not required.
Note: American University is an EEO\AA employer committed to a diverse faculty, staff, and student body.
Roles and Responsibilities
The Visiting Professors will direct the respective clinic, supervise casework, co-teach the weekly seminar and case rounds, and engage in course planning and preparation.
The Visiting Professor will direct this clinic during the Fall and Spring semesters.
Application Procedure
Applications that include a curriculum vitae and cover letter should be submitted online via the InterFolio portal at the following link: http://apply.interfolio.com/124282
Contact Details
Please contact Erica Devine, Faculty Coordinator, at edevine@wcl.american.edu or (202) 274- 4003 if you have any general questions regarding the application process and Professor Llezlie Green, Associate Dean for Experiential Education, llgreen@wcl.american.edu for any other questions about the positions.
Note: The positions will remain open until filled.
Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.
RITU TOMAR VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS, in this case, the petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Cr.P.C.”) for the quashing of the FIR for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 324, 307, 342 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “the IPC”).
FACTS
According to the prevailing tradition and practice, the marriage of the appellant’s sister, Ms. Rekha, the fourth respondent in this case, and the third respondent came to be solemnized on May 15, 2011, leading to its consummation and the birth of a baby girl who has since been given the name Tejal.
APPELLANT’S CONTENTION
According to the said Ms. Rekha, who claimed she had been expelled from the marital home, she filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which was registered as V. No. 230 of 2014 and is currently pending on the file of the Principal Family Judge. As a result, an order was made on July 22, 2017, requiring the third respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 5,000 per month. Additionally, on March 15, 2017, she filed a police report (FIR) with the Harsh Vihar Police Station in North East Delhi for Crime No. 73 of 2017 against the third respondent and others for offences punishable by Sections 498A, 406/34 of the IPC read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The jurisdictional police claimed to have started the inquiry based on the aforementioned FIR that was filed.
RESPONDENT’S CONTENTION
When the aforementioned factual situation occurred, the third respondent filed an Application No. 41 of 2018 under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging that the appellant and Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 had forcibly entered his home and attacked the complainant and his father with a knife on the applicant’s head with the intent to kill them when they refused to heed their demands to leave the village after selling the land and home. On the basis of the aforementioned complaint, which was brought before the Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Gautam Budh Nagar, a report from the second respondent was requested; as a result, a report was submitted on March 11, 2018, opining that the accused parties, including the appellant, never visited the complainant’s home and that the incident in question had not occurred. However, the Learned Magistrate ordered the filing of a police report on May 3, 2018, and as a result, the second respondent filed a police report in Case Crime No. 55 of 2018 against the appellant and others for the violations listed above. As a result, a plea to nullify the aforementioned FIR was filed; however, when it was denied, the current appeal was submitted.
JUDGMENT
1. We have read the documents and listened to knowledgeable solicitors representing the parties. After giving the claim made by the appellant before the High Court careful consideration and repetition before this Court, we have concluded that the third respondent, who is the appellant’s sister’s husband and who had filed an application under Section 156(3) before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Gautam Budh Nagar in application No.41 of 2018, has unquestionably passed away while the current proceedings were pending. His name was consequently removed by order dated January 20, 2020. Regarding responses 1 and 2, none have surfaced.
2. Despite the aforementioned facts and the fact that a dispute between two families had already led to the wife filing two cases, which led to the registration of an FIR against the complainant (the third respondent here) and his family members, as well as the fact that none of the villagers, including the complainant’s neighbours, had supported or testified about the occurrence of any incident on January 26, 2018, as claimed by the complainant.
3. Therefore, insofar as the appellant is concerned, we quash the proceedings filed by the second respondent as Crime No.97 of 2018 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 324, 307, 342, and 506 of the IPC. Therefore, the appeal is granted.
The Mumbai High Court on Friday upheld that any individual representing an agricultureconstituency whilst running for candidature must understand the meaning of being a memberof the committee. If the person’s primary source of income is not from agricultural processes,or if the person holds a trader’s/ commission agent’s or broker’s license, or even if the personhas a future interest in obtaining such a licence, then the person would automatically bedenied the right to partake in the elections for the same. A representative of a “firm” who votes in the APMC election does not have a stake in the “firm’s” operations because he is that “firm’s” representative.
FACTS
For the matter at hand, the facts pertain to the election for the Agriculture Produce MarketCommittee. In the constituency of agricultural credit societies and multipurpose cooperativesocieties in the APMC, Parola, the petitioner submitted his candidature in the OBC categoryand in the Open category. In the present case, the petitioner is a member of Parola Taluka
Cooperative Fruit Society. This society is registered to vote in the merchant’s constituencyand has a trader’s licence. The problem that arose was that according to Rule 10(2)(ii) of theMaharashtra Agricultural Produce Market Committee (Election to Committee) Rules, 2017,an individual associated with a trading licence is ineligible to run for office in an agriculturalseat. In furtherance of the same, several objections and appeals were raised which disqualified the petitioner from participating in the elections. The petitioner has accordinglyfiled a writ petition to clarify the matter once and for all.
CONTENTIONS
Petitioner
The petitioner’s learned counsel has submitted before the High Court that the petitioner is notdisqualified under Rule 10(2)(ii) of the Election Rules 2017 since he serves as a ParolaTaluka Cooperative Fruit Sale Society representative and does not have an individual license.According to the learned counsel, the petitioner cannot be declared ineligible under Rule10(2)(ii) of the Election Rules 2017 since they represent a society with a trader’s license.
JUDGEMENT
Upon giving due regard to the facts and the law in the above-mentioned case, it is contended by the Bombay High Court that it is patently illegal to have passed the orders as have beenpassed by the preceding authorities. The Hon’ble Court held that the petitioner was not disqualified from running for the elections, and thereby, the election authority has beeninstructed to include the name of the petitioner in the final list of nominated candidates. Moreover, as the inclusion of the petitioner’s name in the list of nominated candidates would not affect the election process at this stage, there was no harm in the same. the writ petition was therefore allowed.
The law of torts in India is a complex and multifaceted area of law that governs civil wrongs or injuries caused to a person, property, reputation, or rights. This body of law has developed over time through judicial decisions, statutes, and other sources of law. Throughout history, the law of torts has evolved from homomorphic retaliation to compensatory damages, from negligent liability to multiple liabilities, from absolute liability to relative liability, and then to absolute liability. Since modern times, continental European law has established the status of tort law, while UK and US torts have flourished based on case law. In general, legal law has always had a remedial and preventive function, but the dominant functions have varied in different periods. However, tort has not flourished in India as rapidly as it should have. India largely inherited tort law from Britain, which introduced common law in India in the 18th century. In the quarter century following the 1857 rebellion, the legal system was rationalized and systematized. Mr Frederick Pollock drafted a Civil Law Bill in 1886 which was prepared for the Government of India, although it was never codified.
Losses were common between 1914 and 1965 but were few and far between during those 52 years. This trend continued and it was found that there were fewer incidents of harm reported. In the current situation, the number of reported cases is increasing, but this is not a justified increase. It is not true that the court would not emphasize its importance, because individual cases have spoken about the right to compensation and its importance. In one such case, Jay Laxmi Salt Works (P) Ltd v State of Gujarat, the court said that “Indeed, the whole law of tort is founded and built on the moral that no one has the right to harm or injure others intentionally or even innocently. It would therefore be primitive to classify strictly or to close the ultimate horizon of tort liability, which is always expanding and growing. Even from the point of view of social development, orderly growth of society and cultural complexity, a liberal approach to damage liability by the courts is more favourable.
In this article, we will provide a detailed explanation of the law of torts in India, including its scope, principles, and remedies. The article with throw light on the basic aspects of the Law of Torts, with defining reasons why the Law of Torts are still ambiguous to the Majority of People in the Country and suggestions for improving it.
Types and Features of Law of Torts in India
Torts in India are primarily based on English common law, which has been modified by local legislation and judicial interpretations. The term “tort” comes from the French word “tort,” which means “wrong.” Torts are civil wrongs that are committed by one party against another, resulting in harm or injury. The injured party has the right to seek compensation or other forms of relief for the harm suffered. The Three prominent Types of Law of Torts are as follows:
Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts are those where the defendant intentionally or with a deliberate motive causes harm to the plaintiff. The harm may be physical, emotional, or financial. Examples of intentional torts include assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to land or property, defamation, and conversion.
Negligent Torts: Negligent Torts are those where the defendant’s conduct falls below the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise under similar circumstances, and this conduct causes harm to the plaintiff. Examples of negligent torts include medical negligence, professional negligence, motor vehicle accidents, and premises liability.
Strict Liability Torts: Strict liability Torts are those where the defendant is held responsible for harm caused to the plaintiff, regardless of whether the defendant was at fault or not. In other words, the defendant is liable even if they did not intend to cause harm, and there was no negligence on their part. Examples of strict liability torts include product liability cases, where a defective product causes harm to the consumer, and liability for hazardous activities like transporting hazardous chemicals, where the harm caused cannot be avoided even with reasonable care
Principles of Torts in India
There are several key principles of tort law in India that help to define and clarify the scope of the law. Some of these principles include:
Duty of Care: The principle of duty of care holds that a person has a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others. This principle is central to many negligence torts, as it establishes the standard of care that a defendant is expected to meet.
Causation: Causation is the principle that a defendant’s conduct must have caused the harm suffered by the plaintiff. In order to establish causation, the plaintiff must show that their injury was a direct result of the defendant’s conduct.
Proximate Cause: Proximate cause is the principle that a defendant is only liable for harm that is reasonably foreseeable as a result of their conduct. This principle helps to limit liability to those harms that are closely connected to the defendant’s conduct.
Contributory Negligence: Contributory negligence is the principle that a plaintiff’s own negligence may contribute to the harm suffered, and may therefore limit their ability to recover damages.
Res Ipsa Loquitur: Res Ipsa Loquitur is a Latin term that means “the thing speaks for itself.” This principle applies in cases where the harm suffered is so obviously the result of the defendant’s conduct that no further proof of causation is necessary.
Lack of Awareness Regarding the Law of Torts in India
Despite the significance of tort law in India, there is a lack of awareness regarding this area of law. Many people are not aware of their rights and remedies under the law of torts, which can lead to a lack of accountability and redressal for wrongful conduct. There are several reasons for the lack of awareness regarding the law of torts in India:
Inadequate education and awareness: The first and foremost reason is the lack of adequate education and awareness about Torts laws in India. Most people in India are not aware of what Torts are and how they can be enforced. As a result, they don’t know how to seek compensation or take legal action in the event of an injury or harm caused by someone else’s negligence or intentional act.
Limited legal literacy: Legal literacy in India is limited, and there is a significant lack of knowledge about the legal system and its procedures. This lack of knowledge leads to people not knowing how to access legal resources or how to file legal claims, including Torts claims.
Poor enforcement: Another significant reason is the poor enforcement of Torts laws in India. There is a lack of judicial efficiency in India, with a large number of cases pending in courts. This leads to delays in settlement of claims, which discourages people from pursuing legal action.
Lack of legal aid: Many people in India do not have access to legal aid or representation, which makes it difficult for them to seek justice in the event of harm caused by others. This is especially true for marginalized and vulnerable populations, who are more likely to be victims of harm.
Limited media coverage: There is limited media coverage of Torts laws in India. The media often focuses on criminal cases, and civil cases, such as Torts cases, are not given much attention. This lack of media coverage contributes to the overall lack of awareness of Torts laws in India.
In conclusion, the lack of awareness of Torts laws in India can be attributed to several factors, including inadequate education and awareness, limited legal literacy, poor enforcement, lack of legal aid, and limited media coverage. Addressing these factors could help increase awareness and understanding of Torts laws and improve access to justice for those who have been harmed
Implications of Lack of Awareness Regarding the Law of Torts in India
The lack of awareness regarding the law of torts in India can have several implications that affect the working of the Law of Torts in the Country. Due to people’s wrong interpretation of the Law of Torts and their failing to understand these laws, the Law of Torts still poses to be an issue that is untouched. The implications can be as follows:
Denial of justice: One of the most significant implications of the lack of awareness regarding the law of Torts is the denial of justice. When people are not aware of their rights under the law of Torts, they may suffer harm without any remedy. This leads to a sense of helplessness among victims, who may not know how to seek compensation or take legal action in the event of harm caused by someone else’s negligence or intentional act.
Increased incidents of harm: Lack of awareness of the law of Torts can also lead to an increase in incidents of harm. People may not take necessary precautions or exercise due care to avoid causing harm to others if they are not aware of their legal obligations. This can lead to an increase in accidents and injuries, which could have been avoided if people were more aware of their legal responsibilities.
Burden on the legal system: When people are not aware of their rights under the law of Torts, they may not seek legal recourse in case of harm. This leads to a reduced number of cases being filed. However, this also puts a burden on the legal system as cases that could have been avoided or settled through alternative means end up in court, leading to longer wait for times and delays in justice.
Inefficiency in compensation: The lack of awareness of the law of Torts can also lead to inefficiencies in compensation. Victims may not know how to assess the damages they have suffered or what compensation they are entitled to under the law. This can lead to inadequate compensation or overcompensation, depending on the circumstances.
Negative impact on business and the economy: Lack of awareness of the law of Torts can also have a negative impact on business and the economy. Businesses that are not aware of their legal obligations may cause harm to customers, employees, or other stakeholders, leading to legal liability and financial losses. This can have a ripple effect on the economy, leading to reduced confidence among investors and consumers.
Inefficiency of the Legal System: The lack of awareness regarding tort law can lead to inefficiencies in the legal system as victims of wrongful conduct may not pursue legal action due to lack of knowledge.
Various Steps to Increase Awareness Regarding the Law of Torts in India
Increasing awareness regarding the law of torts in India is crucial to ensure that victims of wrongful conduct receive adequate redressal and that tortfeasors are held accountable for their actions. Here are some steps that can be taken to increase awareness regarding tort law in India:
Public education campaigns: Public education campaigns can be launched to increase awareness regarding the law of Torts. This can be done through media channels such as TV, radio, newspapers, and social media. The campaigns can be designed to target specific groups, such as consumers, employees, and business owners.
Workshops and training sessions: Workshops and training sessions can be organized for lawyers, law students, and other legal professionals to increase their knowledge and understanding of the law of Torts. This can help them provide better legal advice and representation to clients and ensure that justice is served.
Inclusion in school curriculum: The law of Torts can be included in the school curriculum to increase awareness among young people. This can be done by introducing the concepts of Torts and their implications in civics and social studies classes.
Collaboration with industry bodies: Industry bodies such as chambers of commerce and trade associations can collaborate with legal bodies and conduct awareness campaigns among their members. This can help ensure that businesses are aware of their legal obligations and can take necessary steps to avoid causing harm to others.
Legal aid clinics: Legal aid clinics can be set up in various cities and towns to provide legal advice and representation to those who cannot afford to pay for legal services. This can help ensure that people are aware of their legal rights and can seek legal recourse in case of harm caused by others.
Simplification of legal language: Legal language can be simplified to make it more accessible to the general public. This can help ensure that people are not intimidated by legal jargon and can understand their legal rights and obligations.
Conclusion
The law of torts in India is an important branch of civil law that governs civil wrongs or injuries caused to a person, property, reputation, or rights. Despite its significance, there is a lack of awareness regarding tort law in India. This lack of awareness can lead to a lack of accountability and redressal for wrongful conduct, an increase in wrongful conduct, and inefficiencies in the legal system. To increase awareness regarding tort law in India steps such as incorporation in legal education, public awareness campaigns, translation of legal material, legal aid services, and inclusion in the school curriculum should be taken. Despite the many areas where the public can go to court, Indian tort remains very underdeveloped and unexplored.
One reason that has remained unchanged in the past and present, which has caused the lack of tort cases, is the lack of codified legal laws, which creates a lot of uncertainty in the regulation and resolution of these cases. In addition, the lack of precedents is a problem, as few cases come to court. To promote this goal in a growing country like India, codification and general public awareness are necessary to inform them about their rights and the remedies available in case of violation of those rights. Local conditions must be vigorously addressed and assistance provided so that people can trust the laws. In addition, lawyers and judges who have played an important role in advancing tort law must continue to facilitate these cases.
If these issues are taken care of, the law can certainly get a good hold in the Indian context due to the growing economic activities which may also involve large-scale violations. This would help give lay people the opportunity to seek redress for any wrong done to them and would be a much-needed development in legal proceedings. It is crucial that the general public is aware of their rights and remedies under the law of torts to ensure that they are protected from wrongful conduct and that tortfeasors are held accountable for their actions.
This article is authored by Rishaan Gupta, a 1st year Student at National Law University, Delhi.
Office of HMJ Anish Dayal, High Court of Delhi is inviting applications for the position of law researcher/law clerk commencing from May, 2023.
Eligibility
Applicants must be enrolled with the Bar Council. Prior litigation/research experience is preferred although not mandatory.
Deadline
29.04.23 by 11:59 PM
Application Procedure
Interested applicants must email their CV along with a cover letter to hmjad.applications@gmail.com with the subject “Application for Clerkship – May 2023” no later than 11.59 P.M., 29.04.2023.
NOTE:
Please note that the appointment shall be subject to an assessment internship.
This position is only intended for graduates and is unsuitable for students in their final year of law school.
Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.
White and Brief Advocates and Solicitors is a full-service law firm, headquartered in the heart of the commercial hub of Mumbai. The Firm has rapidly and successfully grown multi-fold since its inception and is one of the emerging legal advisory firms of the country.
Job Position
Associate/Article Assistant for Indirect Tax Advisory
Required Skills/Experience
For Associate:
0-3 Years PQE (CA/LLB) experience in Indirect Tax with strong technical knowledge of GST, Customs, other Indirect Tax and Allied Laws.
Advance working experience of MS Office Suite with excellent communication skills (written and spoken English)
For Article Assistant:
A candidate who possesses a degree in law or a related field with excellent writing skills and the ability to conduct legal research.
Candidate should have a strong understanding of legal terminology and possess excellent attention to detail.
Previous experience in legal writing and journalism is preferred but not required.
Application Procedure
Interested candidates are kindly requested to submit their CVs at hr@whiteandbrief.com
Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.
‘PSS Legal’ is recruiting Lawyers specialising and practising in ‘Corporate Transactions’.
Job Description
Legal Due Diligence, Mergers, Acquisitions, Joint Ventures, Structuring, Restructuring, Capital Markets and Securities, Commercial Contracts and advising on all regulatory matters related to transactions.
Requirements
Law Degree from a registered University and enrolment with a State Bar Council.
Three to fifteen years of post-qualification experience in legal practice.
An in-depth understanding of corporate law and corporate transactions.
Excellent negotiation, communication and interpersonal skills.
Ability to work independently as well as collaboratively.
Candidates who meet the above requirements and who are pursuing or have a CS qualification are preferred.
Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.
INTTL ADVOCARE was established in 1991 by Hemant Singh, Managing and Founder Partner, as well as a leading IPR lawyer based at New Delhi with a branch office at Mumbai. Hemant Singh has handled over 2000 IP litigation cases on various subjects such as trademarks, copyrights, industrial designs, patents etc. The firm has been involved in several landmark judgments delivered by Indian Courts in the IP field.
Team
IP Litigation and IP Prosecution team.
Experience
3+ Years
Desired Qualification
Should have prior experience in handling matters in Court
Should have good drafting skills
Should have excellent research and communication skills
Should have strong knowledge of IP Laws
Application Procedure
Interested candidates may share their CV at hr@inttleadvocate.com
Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.
