About the University

Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University is a State university in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. The first University of its kind, which also provides accessible and quality higher education to differently-abled students, in a completely barrier-free environment. We are unique, much different from others.

About Constitutional Law Society

The Constitutional law Society, Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University, Lucknow is established in 2019 by Mr. Sharad Trivedi in the faculty of Law to explore new areas of Constitutional Law and to encourage other students to explore new areas of constitutional law. Society mainly focuses on providing the best knowledge of Constitutional Law by the medium of Lectures, seminars, and interactive sessions of Judges, advocates, Professors, and other Legal Luminaries.

About the Speaker

Dr. Heather Katharine Allansdottir is a Faculty Member of the Law and Social Sciences Department at Bifröst University and a researcher of constitutional law and human rights law. She is a dual British-Australian citizen, and has a doctorate from Oxford University in comparative constitutional law and an MA in human rights law from the University of Bologna and University of Sarajevo.

She has worked for human rights NGOs in Amman, Berlin and London and worked with grassroots human rights activists in Sarajevo and Cairo. She has worked as a journalist and a researcher of human rights in the Balkans, former Soviet Union, Middle East and Australia.

She has also published a book on freedom of expression in 2013 and her books on polar law, and comparative constitutional law, are both forthcoming. Her journalism has been published in The Guardian, Al Jazeera, Foreign Policy and elsewhere, focusing on human rights, women’s rights, social justice and equality. She is currently based between Iceland, Australia and the United Kingdom.

About the Webinar

Constitutional Law Society is organizing a webinar on the topic “Climate Change and the Constitution”. The webinar will be hosted primarily on Microsoft Teams and will also be live-streamed on YouTube. No prior registrations are required.

Date: 27th September 2020

Time: 5:00PM (IST)

The followings are the links to join the webinar:

https://teams.microsoft.com/join/7ys35slu0h59?lm=deeplink&lmsrc=email&emltid=dc7be8b5-a375-4648-89ad-7db3ce4d10dc&linkpos=1&emltype=JoinTenantShareUrl&linktype=openSkypeTeams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjFqJzT9yeQ&feature=youtu.be

Contact Information

Email ID: constilawsoc.dsmnru[at]gmail.com

ABOUT THE INSTITUTION

The University Law College, Bangalore University, is a pioneer legal-education institution located in the garden city of Bengaluru, in the state of Karnataka, India. The college, popularly known as ULC – Bangalore, is widely recognized as one of the country’s best government run law schools. It has consistently been ranked amongst the top law colleges in India by India Today in its annual reports, with the highlight being ranked as the 2nd best law college in the country for the years 2001 and 2004.

UNIVERSITY LAW COLLEGE – MODEL UNITED NATION

We are glad to announce that University Law College & Dept. of Studies in Law, Bangalore University is organizing ‘University Law College Model United Nations 2020’ from 2nd October 2020 to 4th October 2020. This is organized in collaboration with the UN Information Centre for India and Bhutan. We have also collaborated with MUN for UN 75 Dialogues.

For registration of individual delegates, kindly fill this form here- https://forms.gle/MgGHwfHzDxtq6ZHy5

For Institutional Registration, kindly fill the form here- https://forms.gle/mqcr7tRMY7MKSi5M7 

There is no registration fee for participation.

Click here to download the Brochure MUN Brochure

About the MUN

Model United Nations conference is a platform to highlight the importance of issues that concerns global diplomacy, humanity, peace and justice.

This is organized in collaboration with the UN Information Centre for India and Bhutan. ULC, Bangalore has also collaborated with MUN for UN 75 Dialogues.

The MUN is scheduled on October 2nd, 3rd and 4th, 2020.

Prizes

Winners: Prizes worth Rs.15,000/-

Contact Information

  • Email: ulcmun2020[at]gmail.com
  • Instagram: [at]ulcmodelunitednations

Contact Persons

  • Mahima Nayak: 9448465228
  • Niharika D Souza:  9902704031
  • Ajith G G: 9741665388

CLICK HERE FOR THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE.

IIAM- The Indian Institute of Arbitration and Mediation is an institute aimed at resolving commercial disputes through arbitration and mediation, and to develop the culture, standard and professionalism of arbitration and mediation as credible dispute resolution mechanisms.

About the Writing Competition

Indian Institute of Arbitration and Mediation is organizing its 1st International Arbitration Award Writing Competition, with an aim to develop academic discussion in the field of Arbitration and provide students a platform to hone their litigating skills as well as their art of composing awards/judgments within the limits of law.

Eligibility

The competition shall be open for all the students currently pursuing Undergraduate, Postgraduate or PhD in law or equivalent courses recognised by any University across the World.

The participation is allowed for a single author and permissible up to one co-author provided separate registration is made by each co-author. The co-authors can be from the same or different University/College.

Submission Guidelines

The participants have to submit their Awards on or before October 31, 2020, by emailing it to delhi@arbitrationindia.com.

Prize Categories

  • First Prize (Claimant):  Rs. 7500/- and Certificate of Merit
  • First Prize (Respondent):  Rs. 7500/- and Certificate of Merit
  • Second Prize (Claimant):  Rs. 5000/- and Certificate of Merit
  • Second (Respondent):  Rs. 5000/- and Certificate of Merit
  • Top 10 participants (5 from the side of claimant & 5 from the side of respondent) including the recipients of 1st and 2nd Prize shall be awarded Certificate of Merit and the awards shall be compiled in the form of handbook and shall be published.
  • All the participants shall be awarded with Certificate of Participation.

Registration Fee 

Registration fee of nominal amount: Rs. 300/- (inclusive of GST).

Important Dates

  • Release of Rules and Competition Problem: September 18, 2020
  • Last Date for Clarifications of doubts: September 28, 2020
  • Last Date for Registration: October 05, 2020
  • Last Date of Award Submission: October 31, 2020
  • Declaration of Results: November 30, 2020

CLICK HERE FOR THE PROBLEM OF THE COMPETITION.

CLICK HERE FoR THE OFFICIAL PAGE.

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has informed the Supreme Court that the credit shell facility for tickets booked during the lockdown period will only be applicable to passengers who could not avail flights and that no such credit shell would be given to the travel agents. The Centre has also informed the top Court that the refund for air tickets will only be applicable for flights originating in India, irrespective of it being an Indian or international carrier coming into India.

The Bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, Subhash and MR Shah had passed a question to the DGCA on why credit shell cannot be given to agent if tickets are booked through an agent. In its fresh affidavit, the DGCA has stated that existing regulatory mechanisms recognize the contract between the passengers and the airlines alone for a ticket purchased, for which a named passenger along can be accounted for in the ‘passenger manifest’ of a scheduled flight and which is to be maintained as per the best international practices and regulations.

The DGCA has stated in clear terms that when a passenger has purchased tickets from a travel agent which has already been paid for by the agent, then “either the credit shell or the tickets in lieu of Credit Shell goes to the passenger directly.”

To illustrate, the DGCA states that when the travel agent is approached by any passengers desirous of purchasing the ticket of a scheduled flight, the travel agent on behalf of the said passengers makes a request to the airline for the issuance of a ticket in the name of the passengers from the slots/seats pre-blocked in his name.

The DGCA has no role in this private contract which pertains only to pre-blocking of slots/seats for commercial gains. The role of the DGCA commerce when the tickets are actually purchased by a recognized passenger.

“It is stated that as per the existing regulations, once a ticket is issued by the airlines in the name of an identified passenger, his/her name and other particulars become part of the “passengers manifest” reads the reply. The DGCA further submits that cases where tickets have been issued by the issued through a travel agent , but the passenger(s) are yet to pay for the same to the travel agent, “ falls within a category, where again, there are private contracts between

the travel agent/corporate houses with the airlines” and where the DGCA has no role to play.

The Centre states that as per the extant regulations, this lump-sum payment of money by a travel agent or a corporate house on behalf of his client i.e the frequent traveller or its employees to the airlines, either in advance or after availing the flight services, is not recognized as a contract of purchased of purchase of tickets under the Civil Aviation Rules (CAR) and that the same remains in the realm of private contract between the parties.

The CARs recognizes only those tickets, which are actually issued by the airlines in the name of a known and identified traveller, who is either the client of the travel agent or an employee of a corporate house, the DGCA adds.

If is neither be feasible nor advisable for the Directorate General of Civil Aviation’s (DGCA) / Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) to regulate and supervise such private arrangements between the airlines and the agents. For the same reason, the credit shell or the benefits contemplated under the proposed formulation cannot go to the travel agent as claimed by them”

On the point of there being no refund for flights originating outside India, the DGCA says that the ambit of the regulatory mechanism of the DGCA does not cover international flights, which originate from any foreign destination.

The case is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court on Friday when the counsels are expected to wrap up their submissions.

The Bombay High Court bench quashed the order of police authorities, extrening Shiv Sena party members out of entire Ahmednagar District claiming it to be an impugned order suffering from vice of arbitrariness. The bench consisted of Justice M.G. Sewlikar and T.V. Nalawade.

It was alleged on the petitioners that they were running a gang and were armed with knives and that they were assaulting people including doctors and government servants and six offences were registered against them relating to human body and property, which led to the externment proceedings where they denied all allegations and claimed that proceedings were initiated by their political rivals. Learned Counsel S.S. Chapalgaonkar was representing the petitioner and Shri S.J. Salgare, learned A.P.P. was representing the respondent.

Respondent’s Contention

It was argued that the activities of the petitioners are dangerous and harmful to the society. The allegations showed that they assault any one including doctors and government servants. They have created reign of terror in the locality. People are not coming forward to depose against them. Therefore, to have peace and harmony in the society, their externment is absolutely essential and therefore, they have been rightly externed from Ahmednagar district.

Petitioner’s Contention

It was submitted that extraneous material has been considered by respondent no.1 and 3 while passing order of externment. According to him, this itself is a ground for setting aside the externment order. He has further stated that the petitioners are alleged to have formed a gang. It is alleged that they have formed a gang of vagabond boys but no action has been taken against those vagabond boys. He further argued that in two cases the petitioners have been acquitted. But those cases have been considered by respondent No. 1 and 3 for externing petitioners. He further argued that the externment orders are excessive, as the activities of the petitioners are restricted to Rahata Police Station but they have been externed from entire district, for which no reasons are assigned. He, therefore, prayed setting aside the orders of respondent Nos.1 and 3.

Court’s Decision

The Court observed the fact that the petitioners were acquitted in two of six cases in the show cause list and stated’

When a competent Criminal Court has acquitted the petitioners, there was no reason for the Externing Authority to consider these cases for the externment of the petitioners”.

The Court even questioned the time period of 5 years between the cases and the sudden proceeding of externment.

The Court observed that the respondent considered two cases outside of the show cause list and also failed to mention the alleged gang members in the show  cause notice and questioned the existence of such gang stating’

There is no evidence to show that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 have formed a gang of which they are leaders. The Externing Officer has neither mentioned the names of other gang members nor is any action initiated against any of the gang members”.

The Court further claimed the externment order was excessive and could not sustain without any reason, and it suffered from the vice of arbitrariness and thus quashed the externment of the petitioners.

This article has been written by Prithiv Raj Sahu, a student of KIIT School of Law, Bhubaneswar (4th year). Picture credits to Wikipedia

There are largely two types of Companies –  

  1. Public Limited Company 
  2. Private Limited Company

Public Limited Company – A public limited company is a joint stock company. It is governed under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 2013. While there is no limit on the number of members, it is formed by the association of persons voluntarily with a minimum paid up capital of 5 lakh rupees. Transferability of shares has no restriction. The company can invite public for subscription of shares and debentures. The term public limited is added to its name at the time of incorporation.

Private Limited Company – the private limited company is a joint stock company. However, it is governed under the ambit of the Indian Companies Act, 2013. It is formed by voluntary association of persons with a minimum paid up capital of 1 lakh rupees. While the maximum number of members is 200, it does not include the current employees or ex-employees who were members during their employment terms. Employees may continue to be the member after their termination of employment in the company. Transfer of shares is restricted. It prohibits the entry of public through subscription of shares and debentures. The term private limited is used at the end of its name.

Companies Act, 1956

Section 31 plays an important role during conversion of a public company into a private company. As conversion of a public company into a private company involves alteration of article of association of public company which cannot be done under section 31 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Companies Act, 2013

The legal provisions related to conversion are given in section 14 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with rule 41 of Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, as amended. As per section 14 of the Companies Act, 2013 a public company may convert itself into a private company by taking approval of members by way of passing special resolution in the General Meeting and by taking the approval of Central Government on an application made in such form and manner as may be prescribed.

  1. Section 13 -Tells for the alteration of memorandum of articles (Moa) of company. The conversion of public company into private company can be done if the memorandum allows for the conversion. Hence, to convert the company into private company, the alteration of moa is necessary.
  2. Section 14 – Tells for alteration of articles of association (Aoa) for conversion of public company into private company. The conversion is subject to the approval of tribunal.
  3. Section 18 – Tells for conversion of companies which are already registered. Section 18 provides for converting of any class of company into another class by doing alteration in moa and Aoa of the company.  
  4. The companies’ incorporation (fourth amendment) rules, 2014, the conversion of public company into private company are explained. The central government has wide powers to amend the said rules  

Advantages of the Process

The members of Private Company cannot issue their shares publicly. The shareholders need to discuss and take prior consent of the other shareholders for the transfer of shares. By putting a restriction on transfer in Private Company, the membership of undesirable persons can be prevented. The control of Company is in the hand of the owners of capital which is not so in the Public Company. The Private Company can grant Loans to Directors without the prior approval or consent of the Central Government. There is no requirement to hold a Statutory Meeting in Company as no outsider is a shareholder of the Private Company.

Procedure for Conversion

  1. Convene a Meeting of Board of Directors
  2. Convene General Meeting
  3. Filing of Form INC-27 with ROC
  4. Filing of forms with ROC 
  5. File an Application for Conversion of Public Company into Private Company
  6. Publication of an Advertisement
  7. Submit the further information as required by Regional Director
  8. Submit the Copy of Objection with Regional Director
  9. Approve the Application of the Conversion 
  10.  File Form INC-28 with ROC
  11.  New Certificate of Incorporation 

Checklists for other legal provisions

Inspection of Documents – List of Creditors shall be submitted with Registrar of Companies and such creditors can any time inspect documents of the company during business hours.

Objection if Any Received – Where any objection of any person whose interest is likely to be affected by the proposed application has been received by the applicant, it shall serve a copy thereof to the Central Government on or before the date of hearing.

Where No Objection Is Received – Where no objection received from any person in response to the advertisement or notice under sub-rule (5) or otherwise, the application may be put up for orders without hearing and the order either approving or rejecting the application shall be passed within 30 days of receipt of the application.

Where Objection Is Received – After checking of application with Annexures the hearing will take place at the Regional Director office and it should be represented by the company or practicing professional or advocate. The Regional Director will make an order confirming the alteration on such terms and conditions, if any, as it thinks fit, and may make such order as to costs as it thinks proper

Conclusion

Conversion of Public Company into Private Company is time taking and needs to adhere to the various formalities prescribed in Companies Act, 2013. The Private Company has a benefit of less compliance over Public Company. Sometimes, there are controversies regarding the Conversion, but if the consensus of all the shareholders is obtained the process of Conversion would go smoothly and efficiently. The process of Conversion is long-lasting and lengthy.

Latest Posts


This article has been written by Navneet Chandra.

Dissent in its literal meaning is an opinion, philosophy or sentiment of non-agreement or opposition to a prevailing idea or policy enforced by a government, political party or other entity or individual in a capacity of contextual authority. A dissenting person may be referred to as a dissenter.

Powerful leaders encourage a culture of dissent, and seek to create a workplace where radical candour is appreciated – allowing people to challenge the consensus. One blue-chip consulting firm believes that “dissent is an obligation,” meaning that the youngest person in the room should be able to challenge more experienced members of a team without fear of reprisal. Dissent dis-sent (noun/verb): the holding or expression of opinions at variance with those commonly or officially held. However, speaking truth to power could be considered an act of bravery in many organizations, as well as in the wider community. There are many examples of dissenters throughout history who have been ridiculed or even punished for their views. But though their bravery of standing center stage, and great sacrifice, they eventually convinced the masses of their position. They changed the world.

Dissent and Democracy

The Preamble to the Constitution of India promises liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship. Clauses (a) to (c) of Article 19(1) promise:-

  • Freedom of speech and expression;
  • Freedom to assemble peaceably and without arms;
  • And the freedom to form associations or unions;

These three freedoms are vehicles through which dissent can be expressed. The right of freedom of opinion and the right of freedom of conscience by themselves include the extremely important right to disagree. The right to disagree, the right to dissent and the right to take another point of view would inhere inherently in each and every citizen of the country.

Every society has its own rules and over a period of time when people only stick to the age-old rules and conventions, society degenerates. New thinkers are born when they disagree with well accepted norms of society. If everybody follows the well-trodden path, no new paths will be created. If a person does not ask questions and does not raise doubts questioning age-old systems, no new systems would develop and the horizons of  the  mind  will  not  expand. Whether it be Buddha, Mahavira, Jesus Christ, Prophet Mohammad, Guru Nanak Dev, Martin Luther, Kabir, Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Swami Dayanand Saraswati, Karl Marx or Mahatma Gandhi, new thoughts and practices would not have been established, if they had quietly submitted to the views of their forefathers and had not questioned the existing practices, beliefs and rituals.

Importance of Dissent

Dissent is essential in a democracy. If a country has to grow in a holistic manner where not only the economic rights but also the civil rights of the citizen are to be protected, dissent and disagreement have to be permitted, and in fact, should be encouraged. It is only if there is discussion, disagreement and dialogue that we can arrive at better ways to run the country.

Dissenting in Judgments

It is a well-settled principle of jurisprudence that law should be certain, but in this fast-changing world can laws remain stagnant?

In my view the interpretation of the laws has to be dynamic and change with times and therefore it is not necessary that all of us agree with each other. That is why dissent plays an important role in the decision-making process.

Considering the case of A.K. Gopalan vs. The State of Madras

As far as India is concerned the 1st most important dissent was by Justice Fazal Ali in A.K. Gopalan’s case. The question to be decided in this case is whether the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (Act IV of 1950), is wholly or in part invalid and whether the petitioner who had been detained under that Act was entitled to a writ in the nature of habeas corpus on the ground that his detention is illegal.

Majority:- If the procedure mentioned in those articles is followed the arrest and detention contemplated by article 22(1) and (2), although they infringe the personal liberty of the individual, will be legal, because that becomes the established legal procedure in respect of arrest and detention.

Fazl Ali, J.- Procedure must be reasonable and fair.

“The question is whether the principle that no person can be condemned without a hearing by an impartial tribunal which is well-recognized in all modern civilized systems of law and which Halsbury puts on a par with well-recognized fundamental rights cannot be regarded as part of the law of this country.…. If that is so, then ‘procedure established by law’ must include this principle, whatever else it may or may not include” This view was later accepted in R.C. Cooper’s case (Bank Nationalization Case). For many in the audience who joined practice in the 80s or thereafter, these observations would seem almost redundant, however at the time when they were made, these were path- breaking.

Conclusion

The right to dissent includes the right to criticize. We all must be open to criticism. The judiciary is not above criticism. If judges  of the superior courts were to take note of all the contemptuous communications received by them, there would be no work other than the contempt proceedings. In fact, I welcome criticism of the judiciary because only if there is criticism, will there be improvement. Not only should there be criticism but there must be introspection. When we introspect, we will find that many decisions taken by us need to be corrected. Criticism of the executive, the judiciary, the bureaucracy or the Armed Forces cannot be termed ‘anti-national’. In case we attempt to stifle criticism of the institutions whether it be the legislature, the executive or the judiciary or other bodies of the State, we shall become a police State instead of a democracy and this the founding fathers never expected this country to be.

Latest Posts


INTRODUCTION

The Apex Court bench consisting of Justice DY Chandrachud, KM Joseph and Indu Malhotra on Wednesday observed that the precise time when the gazette is published in the electronic mode is significant for determining the enforceability of the notifications and thus upheld a Punjab and Haryana High Court judgement which allowed the writ petitions filed by various importers.

The terrorist attack at Pulwama, Jammu and Kashmir, on February 14 last year, led to the Narendra Modi government adopting ostensibly strong measures against Pakistan to demonstrate its determination to strike back against India’s perceived adversary and one of these measures was a notification published on 16.02.2019 in exercise of powers under Section 8A (1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. This notification introduced a tariff entry by which all goods originating in or exported from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan were subjected to an enhanced custom duty of 200%. The precise time at which the notification was uploaded on the e-Gazette was 20:46:58 hours.

On August 26 last year, a division bench of the High Court allowed a batch of writ petitions. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that since the importers, who had imported goods from Pakistan, had presented their bills of entry and completed the process of self-assessment before the notification enhancing the rate of duty to 200% was issued and uploaded, the enhanced rate of duty is not attracted.

Centre’s Contention

  • The Centre contended that irrespective of the point of time when a notification has been uploaded or published in the e-Gazette, the rate of duty leviable on imported goods cleared for home consumption is, by a legal fiction, the rate prevalent on the date of the presentation of the bill of entry.
  • They further contended that under Section 5 (3) of the General Clauses Act, a Central Act or Regulation, unless the contrary is expressed, comes into force immediately on the expiration of the day preceding its commencement.
  • It was further put forward that ‘Commencement’ can only be from a day which takes within its fold the entire period of 24 hours from midnight of the day before the issuance of the notification.

Respondent’s Contention

  • The importers contended that the importers fulfilled the twin requirements of the goods having entered on 16 February 2019 and the bill of entry having been filed before 20:46 hours when notification 5/2019 was issued.

Court’s Decision

  • The court observed that when the change in manner of publishing gazette notification from analog to digital, the precise time when the gazette is published in the electronic mode assumes significance. In the era of the electronic publication of gazette notifications and electronic filling of bills of entry, the revised rate of import duty under notification 5/2019 applies to bills of entry presented for home consumption after the notification was uploaded in the e-Gazette at 20:46:58 hours on February 16, 2019.
  • The court further held that a notification issued by the government pursuant to the conferment of statutory power is distinct from an act of the legislature; administrative notifications, even when they are issued in pursuance of an enabling statutory framework, are subject to the statute. In empowering the Central government to exercise power under Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act, parliament has not either expressly or by necessary implication indicated that a notification once issued will have a force and effect anterior in time. A notification enhancing the rate of duty under Section 8A has prospective effect, the notification must be treated as having coming into force not before its publication which is at 20:46:58 hours on 16.02.2019. This would necessarily mean that the notification cannot be used to alter the rate of duty on the basis of which, in fact, there was presentation of Bill of Entry several hours ago, the self-assessment was done and what is more, the self-assessment was completed under Regulation 4(2) of the 2018 regulations.
  • While affirming the High Court judgement, the Court held that the rate of duty which was crystallized at the time and on the date of the presentation of the bills of entry in terms of the provisions of Section 15 read with Regulation of 2018. The power of reassessment under Section 17(4) could not have been exercised since this is not a case where there was an incorrect self-assessment of duty. The duty was correctly assessed at the time of self-assessment in terms of the duty which was in force on that date and at the time. The subsequent publication of the notification bearing 5/2019 did not furnish a valid basis for re-assessment.

REPORT BY-

ABHILASHA KUMARI

The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice in a plea seeking issuance of directions to the Madhya Pradesh State Government as well as the High Court of MP to increase the age of superannuation of members of subordinate judiciary to 62 years. A bench of Chief Justice SA Bobde, Justices AS Bopanna & V. Ramasubramanium took up the plea for hearing which states that the failure on the part of the authorities to increase the age of superannuation as has been done for MP State government employees has resulted in “hostile discrimination vis-à-vis State Govt. employees who are governed by the same services rules”. The plea also seeks modification of paras 26 & 40 of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of All India Judges Association & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Which held that superannuation of subordinate judicial officers cannot be raised to 62 years of age.

Senior Avocate Vikas Singh along with advocate on Recod Samir Malik appeared for the petitioners, the Madhya Pradesh Judges Association. The plea states that if State Governments would be getting the benefit of superannuation at the age of 62 but judges have to retire at the age of 60, it is clearly a violation of Article 14 of the constitution.

Petitioner-Association has averred that prior to the notification dated March 31, 2018 issued by the state government, the superannuation age of an employees was 60 years, which was later enhanced to 62 years vide the said notification. Further to this, the plea states that by promulgation of Ordinance, the superannuation of age of Judges of Subordinated judiciary will be 60 years whereas Subordinate Employees of District Courts Class III & IV will retire at age of 62 years.

In light of this, the plea brings out that, “Government of MP has derived subordinate judicial officers of state of MP the benefit of increase in the superannuation age and thereby Government of MP has discriminated Judicial officers, as other state State Officers and employees are getting benefit of superannuation age 62 but the judicial officer has to retire at the age of 60. Aggrieved by the said discrimination, it is stated that the association made a representation made a representation to the government which was duly rejected by them. Further to this, it is contended that the issue of increase in superannuation age is the exclusive power of State Government.

In this backdrop, the prayer of the petition reads that the court issue directions for increasing the age of superannuation of Subordinate Judicial Officers to 62 years as has been done for the State Government employees and consequently amend rule 16 of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 2017 and Rule 14 of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Services) rules, 1994.

The plea has been drawn by Advocate Yunus Malik.

THEME:

The quiz will be based on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) – Current Affairs, Recent and Landmark Judgments, etc.

RULES & REGULATIONS:

  1. A link shall be provided 15 minutes before the Quiz, on the registered e-mail id of the participant.
  2. This link should not be shared with others, as it is unique to the participant to maintain the confidentiality and spirit of the
  3. The participant cannot re-attempt the quiz once they have submitted the form. Please be careful as the form can be submitted only
  4. The link shall be active for a time duration of 07 minutes ONLY. The participants are expected to complete the quiz within that
  5. Submissions post the allotted time shall be disqualified.
  6. The results declared would be final and the authority vests with the organizers to change or modify the same.

GUIDELINES:

  1. This Quiz will be an online Quiz conducted on Google
  1. There will be 20 questions in the
  2. The Quiz will include both MCQs and One Word
  3. Each participant will get a maximum time of 7 minutes to complete the
  4. No Hints will be provided to the

PRE-REQUISITES:

  1. The participants are expected to have a stable internet
  1. A participant is advised to use a laptop or PC for the
  2. Any technical glitches or ambiguity faced by the participant due to connectivity issues shall not be entertained by the

PRIZES

  1. The Top 3 winners will secure an Internship at ARENESS Law and shall be awarded a Certificate of merit.
  1. Additionally, the winner shall be awarded a Cash Prize of ₹1000/- along with the Certificate of merit.
  2. The 1st Runner-Up shall be awarded a Cash Prize of ₹500/- along with the Certificate of
  3. The 2nd Runner-Up shall be awarded a Cash Prize of ₹300/- along with the Certificate of

Each participant will be provided with a Certificate of Participation.

PAYMENT DETAILS

Payment has to be made by scanning the QR Code or by sending it to the UPI ID/Payment no. through PhonePe, GPay, or PayTm application.

Payment No. – 7544813155 UPI ID – 7544813155@paytm

For any further information or clarifications, reach out to us at workspace.tlg@gmail.com