Tag: lawyers

Name of the Case

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra & Others v State of Uttar Pradesh

Citation

AIR 1985 S.C. 652, 1985 SCR (3) 169

Year of the Case

1985

Appellant

Rural Litigation & Entitlement Kendra

Respondent

State of Uttar Pradesh

Bench

Justice P.N. Bhagwati
Justice Amerendra Nath
Justice Rangnath Mishra

Acts Involved

Constitution of India, Article 32 and 48A, The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Central Act No. 69, Acts of Parliament, 1980, The Mines Act, 1952.

Overview

This judgment is associated with a previous sentence by the Supreme Court in a similar context. The Apex Court had recognized a writ petition from Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra concerning the illicit and unauthorized working of limestone mining in the Mussoorie Hill radius, India. It said that the quarries initiated a peril to a thriving environment and affected the eternal water springs. During the unresolved of the Writ Petitions, the Bench had assigned a committee to analyze the limestone quarries expressed in the Writ Petitions. The Government had also appointed a working batch on the excavation of limestone quarries in the Dehradun-Mussoorie region. On 12th March 1985, the Apex Court consented to a comprehensive order giving several directions and discovering that the particulars of the decision would be embarked in the verdict to trail later. In this decision, although, the court opined that it was not crucial to give any additional reasons which had already been presumed in the decision held by the Bench on 12th March 1985 as the broad grounds had been adequately embarked in that direction.

Facts of the Case

Doon Valley is a division of the Mussoorie hill strings of The Himalayas. The Doon valley region was very prosperous. Various rivers have their origin in Mussoorie hills which made the valley zone ecologically flourish. However, it set off a district for limestone mining and the valley started degrading due to the operation of fulminating, cutting trees, and utmost mining in the 1950s. Limestone mining actions in the Doon valley increased between 1955 and 1965. The action of exploding, for the extraction of minerals, led to a lack of vegetation in the valley. In the 1980s, the valley saw its natural beauty vanishing and experienced floods, high temperatures, landslides, water scarcity, and cropland obliteration.

The State minister of Mines of Uttar Pradesh prohibited mining industries in 1961. However, in 1962, the state government held numerous mining and excavation leases for 20 years and hollowing was happening again. When leases approached for resurrection in 1982, the state prohibited them on the account of ecological destruction. Mining companies expanded despite the decision of the government. Allahabad High Court authorized mining in the Doon valley, evaluating economic benefit over ecological elements. In 1983, a local NGO of Dehradun and RLEK, sent a complaint letter against environmental poverty to the Apex Court. The Supreme Court recorded this complaint under Article 32 as a writ petition. The Court directed the gauging of all current mining actions in the valley. The court also concentrated on the state government-initiated database for the cultivation of the zone.

Issues

1. Whether the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 will be licit in the process of recommencement of leases or not? The leases were resolved to mining industries in 1962 and the Forest Conservation Act was sanctioned in 1980.

2. Whether the mining operations in government forests violated the Forest Conservation Act? The Act prohibited those non-forest operations in forest areas, which do not have the assistance of the central government.

3. Whether environmental conservation should be given priority over the economic help of the country?

Contentions of the Petitioner

1. Environmental demolition in Doon Valley leads to obstruction in the living of citizens, which interrupts their fundamental right to a healthy environment. The right to a healthy environment is under Article 21 of the Constitution, a portion of the Right to Life.

2. Refusal of lease restoration by the public abolished the state’s consent for mining.

3. Forests come under a concurrent list, so authorization of the central government should also be mandatory for mining operations.

Contentions of the Respondent

The Respondents resisted that-

1. The troubling matters should not be evident by the Apex Court, but the administrative constructions of the state under the Environment Protection Act. It should be the affairs of the state’s officials.

2. Respondents asserted that all techniques of mining and quarrying were being moved out by the provisos of the Mines Act of 1952.

3. Mining activities should not be terminated because they are vital in the affairs of the country and the protection of the foreign exchange position of the country.

4. The termination of mines will lead to the redundancy of mine labour.

Judgment

The Central Government had been anxious about the perilous mining activities in the Valley at the aforesaid time when the Apex Court obtained the affair. In 1983, in the Dehradun Valley Litigation file, the Government of India assigned a Working Group to analyze the limestone investigation in the Dehradun-Mussoorie region. D.N. Bhargava, governed both the government’s Working Group and the committee of the court came to aligned conclusions as to the destructive effect of the mines on the surroundings. The Working Group also laid reviews for the court on the restricted mining activities, which were authorized to abide open. In 1986, during the litigation, Parliament sanctioned the Environment Protection Act. Subsequently, the Valley was selected as an organically exquisite portion beneath the Environment Protection Act. Also, the Central Government elected a Doon Valley Board, under the chairmanship of the Minister for Environment, which was entrusted with protecting and restoring contaminated zones of the Valley.

The Supreme Court held that mining in reserved forests in the Dehradun valley violated the Forest Conservation Act. The Forest Conservation Act only prohibited non-forest operations in forest areas that do not have the authorization of the Central Government. Furthermore, regarding ecological integrity and national benefits, the Apex Court was also anxious about the welfare of mine workers and labourers left unpaid by the Dehradun Valley activities. The Court delivered the following:

Mine lessees whose activities were wound-up by the court would be stated as a preference for leases in the new region open to mining. That the eco-task force of the central government, retrieve and reforest the zone vandalized by excavation and that the workers unsettled by mine closure be given preference for jobs with the Eco-Task Force activities in the region.

Concepts Highlighted

The Constitution of India guarantees the privilege of a healthy environment as a fundamental right under Article 21. Industrialization leads to evolution which additionally leads to the deprivation of the environment. The theory of sustainable development has developed over the years that there must be a balance between evolution and ecology. Environmental dishonoring is not right on the pretext of national benefit. According to the socio-economic desires of the nation, administrative and legislative policies for compatible environmental and evolution principles should be intimated. Courts play a very important role in directing the extent of the powers and motives of administrative operations and in evident stability between the environment and evolution.

The necessity of the hour is to maintain an equilibrium between the two. Therefore, the evolution on one edge and pollution permitted environment on the other. The main emphasis should be on the evolution of sustainable living and environmental needs. However, sustainable development is the only way out and administrative measures must follow in accordance therewith.

References

1. The Mines Act, 1952, No. 35, Acts of Parliament, (1992).
2. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, No. 29, Acts of Parliament, (1986).
3. Indian Constitution, art 21.

This article is written by Ashmita Dhumas, who has completed BA LLB from Agra College and is doing a diploma in
Corporate Law from Enhelion.

CASE NUMBER

Writ Petition (crl.) 208 of 2004

EQUIVALENT CITATION

AIR 2006 SC 2522; (2006) 5 SCC 475; 2006 (56) ACC 234

BENCH

Justice Ashok Bhan & Justice Markandey Katju

DECIDED ON

07 July 2006

RELEVANT ACTS

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1951; The Indian Constitution, 1950; The Indian Penal Code, 1860

BRIEF FACTS

The petitioner, Lata, is a 27-year woman who was pursuing her Master’s course in Hindi at Lucknow University. Due to the sudden demise of her parents, she had been living with her brother Ajay Pratap Singh at LDA Colony, Kanpur Road, Lucknow where she finished her intermediate in 1997 and graduated in 2000. The petitioner of her own free will left her brother’s house and married Bramha Nand Gupta at Arya Samaj Mandir. The petitioner’s husband had a business in Delhi and there has been a child out of this wedlock.

On 4^th November 2000, a missing person report was lodged at Sarojini Nagar Police Station, Lucknow by the petitioner’s brother. The police arrested the two sisters (Sangita Gupta, and Mamta Gupta), Rakesh Gupta (husband of Mamta Gupta), and the cousin of the petitioner’s husband (Kallu Gupta). It was alleged that Ajay Pratap Singh, Shashi Pratap Singh, and Anand Pratap Singh (brothers of the petitioner) were furious as the petitioner has undergone an inter-caste marriage. It was further alleged by the petitioner that her brothers have attacked the paternal residence of her husband, beaten up her husband’s mother and uncle, and created chaos in their house. It was also stated by the petitioner that they have cut away the harvest crops of the agricultural field of the petitioner’s husband and sold it and forcibly acquired the field. The Gupta helmet shop of the petitioner’s husband was also forcefully possessed by the petitioner’s brothers. It was further stated that they were threatening to kill the petitioner’s family members and also her.

They also filed a police report alleging the kidnapping of the petitioner against her husband and his relatives at Sarojini Nagar Police Station, Lucknow. On 17^th December 2000, Mamta, Sangita, and Rakesh were arrested while Kallu Gupta was arrested on 2^nd December 2000. Though there wasn’t any case instigated against them, their lives were spoiled. The petitioner went to safeguard her spouse and relatives from her brothers’ persecution. She feared for her and her husband’s lives and approached Rajasthan Women Commission, Jaipur. The Commission recorded her statement and sent it to the Superintendent of Police.

The final report was filed in Sarojini Nagar Police station by the SHO before the learned Judicial Magistrate. On 16^th May 2001, the Sessions Judge granted the petitioner’s husband and his relatives, bail on the personal bond mentioning that no offence has been committed by the accused persons. It was observed that neither was there any offence nor the accused involved in the offence. The SP Lucknow informed the National Human Rights Commission that all the accused were being released from jail on 17^th May 2001.

The Investigating Officer has recorded the statement of Lata Singh on 28 May 2001 where, she stated that she has married Bramha Nand Gupta at her own will and she was not coerced or forced to do so and also, she was provided with armed security. The petitioner’s statement was recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. Despite her statement, the Chief Judicial Magistrate passed a committal order on 15^th October 2001, ignoring the fact that the final report had already been filed by the police. A protest petition was filed against the final report alleging that the petitioner was mentally unfit. On being medically examined by the Board of Doctors of Psychiatric Centre, Jaipur, it was found that the petitioner was not suffering from any sort of mental illness.

The Fast Track Court, Lucknow, issued non-bailable warrants against all four accused, and the accused filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), which was registered as Crl. Misc. No. 520/2003. The High Court ordered the accused to appear before the Sessions Judge, who would determine if an offense was committed. It was alleged by the petitioner that there is a threat to her life. It was further stated by her that there has been irreplaceable damage to her and her husband’s family because of her brothers who had a problem with an inter-caste marriage.

ISSUE

Whether the writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India filed with the prayer to issue a writ of certiorari and /or mandamus to quash the Sessions Trial No. 1201 of 2001 under Sections 366 and 368 of the Indian Penal Code arising out of FIR No. 336 of 2000 registered, maintainable?

JUDGMENT

The Hon’ble Supreme Court allowed the writ petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution and the Sessions Trial No. 1201 of 2001 under Sections 366 and 368 of the Indian Penal Code arising out of FIR No. 336 of 2000 was quashed. It was further stated by the court to the police to take action against anyone who threatens or harasses or performs any violence against the petitioner or the petitioner’s husband or relatives of the petitioner’s husband in accordance with the law. It was observed by the court that the Hindu Marriage Act does not constrain anyone from carrying out an inter-caste marriage. In light of the petition’s claims, the criminal procedure was ordered by the High Court to be launched immediately against the petitioner’s brothers and others involved.

CONCLUSION

The case of Lata Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr is a landmark judgment that has clarified the validity of inter-caste marriages. It can be observed from the court’s decision that any person who is a major has a right to choose the partner of their choice. It can be further considered to be a part of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The act of violence caused by the family members due to the inter-caste or different religion marriage is considered to be a barbaric practice which is unjust as it would be a curtailment of the fundamental right of a person because of some people’s feudal mindsets.

The court further opinionated that a family having a problem with such marriages can stop maintaining social relations with the couple and leave them but they do not have the authority to instigate violence against the married couple for that.  The court stated “In our opinion, such acts of violence or threats or harassment are wholly illegal and those who commit them must be severely punished. This is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major, he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes.”

India’s deep-rooted casteism and religionism are obstacles to a progressive nation. It is important to protect the interests of the youth who are carrying out inter-caste or different religion marriages as they pave the way to discard the toxic discrimination present within India. This landmark judgment has clarified that the Hindu Marriage Act does not prohibit inter-caste marriage and it has made it clear that major women marrying outside their caste is not wrong or prohibited by the law.

This article is written by K. Mihira Chakravarthy, 2^nd year B.A. L.L.B. student from Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University (DSNLU).

Introduction

We are living in the 21st century, in the era of developing thoughts and new cultures, with the people having new and old traditions which makes us a member of society. Someone or the entire society may feel uneasy when someone presents themselves or their job in an unusual way. But does the action offend someone or is it merely a novel or original way for the author to express themselves or their work? Because of these divergent points of view, the term “obscenity” is ambiguous, making it difficult to distinguish between what is and is not offensive. The Latin word obscene, which means “offensive,” especially when modest, is where the word “obscene” originates. Obscene, which according to the Oxford dictionary is “offensive or unpleasant by accepted standards of morality and decency,” seems to be a straightforward word with a straightforward definition.

Tests of obscenity

According to established moral and decency norms, the Oxford Dictionary defines obscene as “offensive or repulsive.” There are mainly three tests to check the content or whether any art or gesture is obscene or not.

Miller test

As a result of the Miller v. California ruling by the US Supreme Court, the United States of America uses the renowned Miller test (1973). Due to online obscenity cases, this test had difficulties. In this instance, Melvin Miller sent five suspicious brochures to the restaurant’s manager via mail. In one instance, Melvin Miller sent the restaurant’s management five suspicious flyers that prominently featured pictures of men and women engaging in various sex acts.

There are three parts to the Miller test. They are:

• The average person, enforcing the contemporary community standards, would find that work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.
• Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct is specially defined by the applicable state law.
• The work, taken as a whole, is short of serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

Hicklin test

This test is a legal test for obscenity that came from the English case Regina v. Hicklin (1868). The case was based on the interpretation of the word “obscene”. Henry Scott resold copies of anti-Catholic leaflets in this test, which is quite lenient. Hicklin held that Scott’s purpose had not been to corrupt public morals but they expose the major issues related to the Catholic Church, so Scott’s intention was innocent. The Supreme Court used the Victorian-era Hicklin test in its famous decision in Ranjit Udeshi v. the State of Maharashtra (1964). The test assessed obscenity by the standard of an individual who was open to immoral influences and would likely be corrupted or depraved by the material in question.

Community standards test

This test was applied in India. According to the Community Standards Test, a gesture or piece of content is only offensive if the overall dominating theme is anti-modern.

The Indian Penal Code 1860

Section 292 Sale of pornographic materials, etc.

1. For sub-section (2), a book, pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting representation, figure, or any other object, shall be deemed to be obscene if it is lascivious or appeals to be so, if its effect, or the effect of any one of its items, is particularly repulsive, is if taken as a whole, such that it tends to corrupt and deprave whoever:
2. sells, lets to hire, distributes, publicly exhibits or in any manner puts into circulation, or for purposes of sale, hire, distribution, public exhibition or circulation, makes, reduces, or has possessed any pornographic literature, pamphlets, papers, artwork, drawings, paintings, representations, or figures, or any other pornographic material; or
3. imports, exports or conveys any obscene object for any of the purposes aforesaid, or knowing or having reason to believe that such object will be sold, let to hire, distributed, shown in public, or otherwise put into circulation, or
4. takes part in or receives profits from any business in the course of which he knows or has reason to believe that any such obscene objects are, for any made, produced, bought, kept, transferred, displayed publicly, or otherwise put into circulation for the aforementioned purposes, or
5. advertises or makes known by any means whatsoever that any person is engaged or is ready to engage in any act which is an offense under this section, or that any such offensive item can be obtained from or through any individual, or
6. offers or attempts to do any act which is an offense under this section, shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, with imprisonment of either description for a time that may last up to five years.

Section 293 Sale, etc., of obscene objects to a young person.

Anyone who sells, rents, distributes, exposes, or circulates any of the pornographic items mentioned in the last section to anyone under the age of twenty, or who offers or attempts to restrict the sale and publication of pornographic books, pamphlets, and other materials that are considered to be “lascivious” will be punished on first conviction by imprisonment of either description for a term that may not exceed three years and by a fine that may not exceed two thousand rupees; on second or subsequent conviction, by imprisonment of either description for a term that may not exceed two years and by a fine that may not exceed two thousand rupees.

Section 294 Obscene acts and songs.

Whoever, to the annoyance of others:

1. does any obscene act in any public place, or
2. sings, recites, or utters any obscene song, ballad, or words, in or near any public place, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may increase to three months, pay a fine, or pay both.
3. The terrible gang rape and murder of victim Jyoti Singh, often known as the Nirbhaya case, prompted the addition of Section 354D to the IPC by the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 2013. It includes keeping an eye on a woman’s online activities, such as her email or other correspondence. Consequently, gathering images of women from their social media profiles would fall within the purview of this section. If found guilty, the offender would be sentenced to three years in prison and pay a fine.

Obscenity in India

Model and actor Milind Soman was booked by the Goa Police for obscenity, days after he posted a photograph of himself running nude on a beach in the state. He is not the only famous person having issues with the Goa Police this week for “obscenity” – actor Poonam Pandey and her husband were detained for a contentious photo shoot, a clip of which went viral online.

What about freedom of expression?

Freedom of speech and expression is not unqualifiedly guaranteed. Article 19 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right also provides for reasonable restrictions on various grounds, including that decency and morality. This means that free speech must be assessed against the moral standards of the contemporary community when it comes to prosecuting obscene conduct or content.

As Section 81 of the IT Act expressly provides, any offense involving obscenity in electronic form may be tried under that law rather than the IPC.

Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008

Section 67(A) Punishment for publishing or transmitting material containing the sexually explicit act, etc., in electronic form. -Whoever publishes or causes to be published in the electronic form any material which contains sexually explicit act or conduct shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and with a fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees and in the event of second or subsequent conviction with either type of prison time that may last up to seven years as well as a fine that may amount to ten lakh rupees.

Can consent be used as a defense? 

Sharing pornographic images in a WhatsApp group may subject the sender to legal action under Section 67 and Section 67A of the IT Act. By Section 354A of the IPC, showing someone pornography is a form of sexual harassment. Nude photos cannot be shared, even with the recipient’s approval. The sender is not permitted to raise it in opposition.

Related case laws

Suhas Katti v. State of Tamil Nadu

It was the first significant case involving cybercrime in Indian history. A divorced woman who used to receive unwelcome sexually graphic images and communications from a man filed the lawsuit. He was keenly interested in marrying her. Through a fake email address set up to annoy the victim, he frequently sent her offensive messages and pictures. The police investigated the incident after the victim reported it and made guilty an arrest. It was later discovered that the man was a relative of the woman and began harassing her after she turned down his marriage proposal. The culprit was found under Sections 67 of the IT Act as well as Sections 469 and 509 of the IPC. The perpetrator was imprisoned in the main prison and given a fine payment requirement.

What do obscenity laws say about Ranveer Singh, who was arrested for uploading nude photos?

The Mumbai Police have filed a case against Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh under the pertinent sections of the Indian Penal Code in the wake of the continuing controversy surrounding the actor’s uploading of nude photos on his Instagram account (IPC). The actor had recently modeled for a nude photo shoot for the Paper magazine

Sections 292, and 294 of the IPC, as well as sections 509 and 67(A) of the Information Technology (IT) Act, have all been used to charge Ranveer Singh with obscenity. Young individuals wanting to get into the sector are being urged by him to follow similar paths to success and wealth.

What does Indian law say about obscenity?

According to Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code, it is unlawful to engage in or utter anything defamatory in public (IPC). For an obscenity to be considered a crime under the IPC, it must “annoy others.” For breaking this law, the maximum punishment is three months in jail. Under Section 292, indecent literature is subject to similar penalties. The section specifically outlaws the sale, display, and distribution of “obscene” content and spells out the consequences for breaking it.

Anyone who sells or wants to sell, permits to hire, distributes, shows, or circulates any such offensive object to a person under the age of 20 would be subject to punishment, according to the law’s Section 293 (Sale, etc., of Obscene Objects to Young Persons). A fine of up to two thousand rupees and a term of imprisonment of either kind that may last up to three years; for a subsequent offense, a term of imprisonment of either kind that may last up to seven years and a fine of up to five thousand rupees.

By using words, gestures, objects, or making noises or actions with the goal that they are heard, seen, or perceived by a woman, by Section 509, a woman’s privacy may be purposefully infringed (word, gesture, or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman). A year in jail, a fine, or both are possible penalties for violators. The laws governing obscenity have altered as a result of the growth of the Internet and social media. The Information Technology Act’s Section 67 may be used to bring legal action against anyone who sends or uploads objectionable content online. However, the phrases “obscene” and “obscenity” are not specifically defined in Indian law.

Conclusion

One of the words in our Indian laws with ambiguous or unclear connotations is ‘obscenity’. Obscenity’s definition does shift from time to time. What is offensive today may not be considered offensive in the future. The proper level of obscenity in movies, web series, the arts, visuals, and literature has not yet been established in our nation, which makes it too vital to address at this time. The conflict between the various cultures and religions that make up our nation is inevitable. Because these are significant issues that could damage the feelings of particular individuals or communities; artists should not be prevented from expressing their opinions when they touch on these types of issues connected to someone’s culture or religion. All literary, artistic, and other creations do not incite hatred in people.

References

1. What does it mean when someone is obscene?, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscene
2. Ranjit D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra, 1965 AIR 881, 1965 SCR (1) 65.
3. Suhas Katti v. State of Tamil Nadu, C No. 4680 of 2004.

This article is written by Kanika Arora, from Delhi Metropolitan Education (Affiliated to GGSIPU).

INTRODUCTION

The global crime rate increases day by day at a highly accelerated rate. Criminology is a science based on the understanding of crime, policy and social justice. In the sense of applying theoretical knowledge to practical experience, it strengthens the work of law in practical lives. Criminology examines various fields like the behaviour of people who commit the crime, reasons why people commit a crime, the effect of crime on society and methods to prevent crime. The main goal of criminology is to find the cause of committing the crimes and the ways to prevent them. It examines the deviant behaviour of individuals who commit a crime and the impact on society at large.

Mostly crime is considered to be man dominant area in our society. Women are considered to be of a polite and spiritual character and they are considered to be the foundations of a family. Feminist criminology developed as a school in criminology because the major criminology theories were for men. It is a study mainly that focuses on women offenders, women victims and the impact of female criminality in society. Feminist criminology includes how women are ignored and stereotyped in criminology. Women committing murder, robbery, theft, and dacoity are easily escaped by the laws protecting them. Women committing the crime are generally stereotyped as mentally unstable. Claire M. Renzetti is the first person who brought the concept of feminist criminology¹ where the author mentions the development of criminology and examines the diversity of feminism.

BRANCHES OF FEMINIST CRIMINOLOGY

Liberal feminism concentrates more on political rights and equality. Liberal feminists’ main aim was gender equality in the field of education, workspace, marriages etc. Their main aim was that women should not be dependent on men for their living, they should also provide for their families. They also support reproductive rights such as abortion rights and strive towards ending sexual harassment against women. This increased the opportunities for women in society. As the women tend to go out for full-time jobs and not be dependent on men, they too might end up committing crimes.

Radical feminism does not oppose men, it opposes the system of patriarchy. It raised the consciousness regarding women’s suppression and it focuses on sexuality. They view male power as the cause of all problems. They argue that men tend to control women, and there are more female victims of male violence. Men always desire to control women and women being oppressed tend to commit crimes so that they can be relieved from the male dominant society.

Marxist feminism tends to argue about economic stability. Economic relation brings gender inequality where men are paid more comparative than women. Women are prevented from participating in all aspects of society as they are controlled by men as well as capital. Crime against women is common in capitalist society as higher economic imbalance creates higher gender inequality that causes violence against women.

Socialistic feminism correlates the relation between class and gender. It mainly draws many concepts of Marxist feminism where crimes against women happen not due to patriarchy but the economic dependence on men. There is discrimination against women in the workspace.

Postmodern feminism mainly focuses on the de-stabilisation of patriarchal norms and living in a gender-neutral society so that the male dominance in the society will be lesser and crimes against women will also decrease.

Ecofeminism is another branch of criminology where it is stated that women have a special biological and spiritual relationship. Like the exploitation of nature, women are exploited by men. A line of defence is also set up as against the domination of men on the planet².

THEORIES ON FEMINIST CRIMINOLOGY

Many stereotypical theories like Sigmund Freud’s Theory suggest that women commit crimes due to penis envy and they thought that they were not equal to men so they started committing crimes he said that female crime is just like longing for a penis. In Strain theory³, it was stated that most people try to achieve their goals but in order to achieve their goals faster, they tend to commit crimes. Feminists rejected this theory because women were not as financially independent as men to have their own goals and they commit far lesser crimes than men.

In societal disorganization theory, due to environmental circumstances or due to some cultures and depending upon who lives where; this was not accepted by feminists as it was stated that women under the control of men tend to commit fewer crimes. Control theories⁴ are not widely accepted because they focus on the class to which people belong and their tendency to commit the crime by including factors like attachment, educational commitment, academic involvement and social rules.

IMPACT OF FEMINIST CRIMINOLOGY

Neglecting female offenders, it is generally assumed that men are only the offenders. It is considered a tradition that women are soft and they do not commit any crimes. Women who challenge the patriarchal gender role structure are viewed as unruly women worthy of punishment. As far as the treatment of females within the criminal justice system is concerned, females should not be given lenient sentences as compared to that men when both people are involved in the same crime, just because she is a female.

The Justice system always refers that women are always society-centric and they have lots of responsibilities in the family as well as in society as a whole. So, women are given lesser punishment than men. Feminist criminology asks why women are supposed to be a victim every time & are supposed to commit fewer crimes than men just on the basis of their gender. According to a WHO⁵ report, 30% of women experience physical or sexual violence at some point in their lives and these violent acts are done by their intimate partner. Feminist criminology makes us think from different perspectives and makes us connect our ideas and help us to conclude a better solution in solving these problems.

FEMINIST CRIMINOLOGY IN THE 21^st CENTURY

There is a huge acceptance of feminist criminology nowadays. There can be lots of research and challenges that can be taken up in this field. The criminal justice system thinks differently about female offenders in the 21^st century where there are several concepts and angles to perceive female offenders. Feminist criminology focuses on the concept that why men and women differ in the path of crime using sex as a control variable; they determine the factors conducting much research that predicts female criminality. This is still needed in the 21^st century because empowering people is the most important and many people are still not aware of many crimes.

Feminist criminology also forms a global perspective and they study across the world regarding this subject. The focus on crime against women is an international issue faced by all women around the world. Abuse of women like child marriages, cheap labour and some traditional practices like female genital mutilation is the focus area in which feminist criminology must conduct further studies. Criminal justice policies are not the same across the world where women are severely punished for violating gender norms, they are often treated as offenders rather than victims too in some aspects.

CONCLUSION

Feminist Criminology is constantly developing and it has undergone various amount of changes. Though still people lack awareness of the feminist criminology concept, there are still places where women are punished for violating gender norms. There are only certain theories and limited publishments in journals regarding feminist criminology. Violence against women is not considered to be a new phenomenon. The study regarding feminist criminology is not explored in depth. The ideas of women thinking about social roles, ideas, and gender norms can also be brought here. Gender-based issues in the criminal justice delivery system can also be given a much wider discussion. Feminist criminologists can look upon the hindrances in achieving their goals so that they can help female offenders and victims to get a better justice delivery.

CITATIONS

1. 1^st Edition Routledge Bo.                                                         
2. LANE, P. (1998). Ecofeminism Meets Criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 235–248.
3. Merton Strain theory of Deviance 1938.
4. Hirschi’s social bond theory.
5. Global and Regional estimates of violence against women, WHO Report, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85239/9789241564625_eng.pdf;jsessionid=A79DF84C464E0F3B278B3A87C6F44407?sequence=1.

This article is written by Sree Lekshmi B J, a third-year law student of Sastra University, Thanjavur.

Introduction

India is a nation where traditions and customs are widely followed. The family’s dignity comes first and they expect to lead a very respectful life in society. There is a huge divide among the population in the country in the name of caste, religion, sex and locality. The prevailing social evils like casteism and discrimination on the grounds of religion, lead to honour killings. Honour killing is a murder performed on an individual either on an outsider or a family member to protect their dignity in society. To date, honour killings are still prevalent in India despite, the development which is happening in the country.

Recently, a Dalit man was killed in Hyderabad by his Muslim wife’s brother. The man was killed because the woman’s family didn’t accept the interfaith marriage. It was also stated by the woman that her brother tried to hang her when she stated that she wanted the marry Nagaraju who even was willing to change into a Muslim for her¹. Due to the deep-rooted traditional cultures present in India, honour killings are based on orthodox beliefs. India is considered to be a patriarchal society where women are seen as a commodity and not as equals to men. They see women as a representation of the family’s reputation. Their rights and choices aren’t given any preferences even when the constitution sees men and women equally.

Defining ‘Honour killing’

An individual is killed in ‘Honour killing’ if a family member or hired killer believes that the person has compromised their moral character and, as a result, tarnished the family’s reputation. Both the victims and the perpetrators of honour killings may be male or female, and the crime may be committed for a variety of criminal reasons. The victim or the offender may be the target of an honour killing in situations where there has been an evident sexual transgression.

Factors causing Honour Killings

The concept of Honour killing was present in India since ancient times. People have reported crimes against their relatives and described these executions as a demonstration carried out to preserve the family’s dignity. Honour killings have historically been committed primarily as sexual orientation-based crimes and have been used as a tool to maintain the dominance of men in society over women. This doesn’t mean that the man has been completely spared from this horror, though.

Illiteracy also is a reason for the honour killings as many of the people wouldn’t be open enough to understand the concepts like homosexuality and inter-caste or faith marriages. Many households aren’t comfortable accepting marriages with lower caste members and this is one of the major factors triggering the honour killings in India especially.

The presence of Khap panchayat is also a reason for the honour crime to be existent in India; also called caste courts. The Khap panchayat, an endogamous, gotra-centric clannish body, developed into a powerful institution in the area around Delhi during the Middle Ages in response to the tenuous state of law and order brought on by the recurrent incursions of foreign invaders into that region. It served two purposes: to protect its members and to mediate conflicts among them. However, the Khap panchayat is an unauthorized organization to declare that something is unethical because of their ideologies.

The case of Laxmi Kahhwaha v. The Rajasthan State² along with a PIL (Public Interest Litigation)had drawn the attention of the Rajasthan High Court. The court had observed that these unconstitutional self-styled panchayat systems have been imposing their authority on the weaker sections of the society, especially on women. It further observed, “These panchayats had no position whatsoever to pass social blacklists, or impose any fine on someone and ignore a person’s basic rights.”

Provisions present against the Honour Killings in India

Constitutional framework-

The offence of Honour killing is against the fundamental rights assured by the Constitution. It violates Article14, 15 (1) and (3), 17, 18, 19. It also violates Article 21 i.e., the Right to Protection of life and personal liberty which says that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law³ which cannot be infringed unless prescribed by the law which is fair, free and just as per the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India⁴.

On the recommendation of the community panchayat, a 20-year-old woman in West Bengal was gang raped because she was dating a guy from a different group. The Supreme Court took suo moto cognizance of the case⁵. As part of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, the Court reaffirmed that the State has a responsibility to uphold the right to choose one’s spouse.

Under Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 any person who has attained 18 years of their age is considered to be a major⁶. However, the eligibility for marriage is 18 years for women and 21 years for men where they have the right to choose their partner and it was held in the case of Lata Singh v. State of U.P. & Anr.⁷ by the Division bench of the Supreme Court that the inter-caste marriages are valid according to the Hindu Marriage Act and it was also stated that if the parents had a problem in such marriage, they can cut the social relations with them but they don’t have any right to harm the couple. In the event of such violence, the court can institute criminal proceedings against them. The Supreme Court, in the petition by the NGO Shakti Vahini v. Union of India⁸ declared, “It is illegal for Khap panchayats to scuttle marriages between two consenting adults.”

Indian Penal Code 1860⁹ provisions-

Any individual found guilty of murder or culpable homicide that does not amount to murder is punished under Sections 299–304. The murder penalty consists of a fine, life in prison, or death. Culpable homicide that is not murder is punishable by a fine and life in prison or a maximum of 10 years in jail.

Section 307: Threatening to kill is punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine. If someone is hurt, the sentence may be increased to life in prison.

Section 308: Penalties for attempting to commit culpable homicide include up to three years in jail, a fine, or both. If it results in harm, the offender faces up to 7 years in prison, a fine, or both.

Criminalize anyone who participates in a criminal conspiracy under Sections 120A and 120B.

Sections 107 to 116: Punishes those who aid and abet killings, including culpable homicide.

Criminal acts committed by multiple people in service of a single goal are punishable under Sections 34 and 35.

Other provisions-

The Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Act, 1989, The Protection of Human rights Act 2006, The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Dowry Act, etc., are present to punish the offender, whoever commits the offence. Due to Casteism, there are many cases where the lower caste people have been tortured and killed for marrying a superior caste person.

Reforms Suggested

Prevention of Crimes in the Name of Honour and Tradition Bill 2010- According to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court, parents or Khap Panchayats cannot intervene in an adult couple’s decision to be married. The most recent decision confirms the Supreme Court’s 2010 directive to the central government to stop honour killing. There has been a proposal to amend IPC and remove the Khap panchayats.

Punishments and Penalties

The convict is awarded death penalty or imprisonment for life and a penalty more than Rs. 5 lakhs. In situations of grave injury, the punishment is 10 years in imprisonment and a fine of Rs 3 lakh, or 3-5 years in prison and a fine of up to 2 lakhs.

Conclusion

Honour killing is a barbaric practice which is still happening in a nation like India which has been developing at a very fast pace. Due to the deep-rooted social evils, the practice is ongoing in rural areas mostly. These types of killings occur due to the disapproval of marriage with the lower community or a caste person or when the sexuality of the persons differs or due to the loss of virginity prior to marriage, and the list goes on.

For same-sex marriages and inter-faith and cultural marriages, it is important to notice that many people in rural areas are uneducated and still have outdated ideologies as they don’t have proper exposure. However, it is important to understand that even though a person’s interest differs from their family, they do not have the authority or the right to take the law into their hands and kill them. Being in a democratic country, people have a right to choose the way they want to live. People have a right to choose their sexuality and their partner as it is their choice. Article 21 doesn’t just mean mere breathing, it is a right to live with dignity and peacefully. The choices opted by the persons regarding their priorities in life do not affect anybody and no one has a charge over a major’s life.

---

Citations

This article is written by K. Mihira Chakravarthy, 1^st year, B.A. L.L.B. student from Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University (DSNLU).

INTRODUCTION

Marriage brings two individuals together as spouses and their bond is recognized by the community in the form of marriage rituals. Different religions perceive the concept of marriage from different perspectives. Hindu marriages are considered to be a union of two souls so that they can perform dharma (responsibility/duties). The Christian marriage happens for uniting with someone for the rest of their lives. Consummation also is a vital part of all marriages. Our society only takes consummation after marriage as a sacred one and it does not recognize consummation before marriages. Hence, engaging in a sexual activity/intercourse with a person other than their spouse is considered to be a wrongful act. Rape is a serious crime. Rape is defined legally as when a male penetrates a female’s vagina, anus, or mouth with a penis or any other object either with her consent (falling under any of the seven descriptions mentioned in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860) or without her consent subject to the exception mentioned therein.

SECTION 375 AND SECTION 90 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860

Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 states that a man commits rape when he penetrates his penis or inserts any object or part of the body other than the penis or manipulates any part of the body of a female so as to cause penetration into vagina, anus, urethra or mouth of a woman or applies his mouth in vagina, anus, urethra of a woman with or without consent as per any of the following seven descriptions-

1. Against her will
2. Without her consent
3. With her consent, when consent is obtained by putting her or any other person she is interested in fear of death
4. With her consent, when a man knows that he is not her husband and consent is given by her because she believes that he is another man whom she believes herself to be lawfully married
5. With her consent, where the consent is obtained in the state of intoxication or in the state of unsoundness
6. With or without consent when she is under eighteen years of age
7. When she is unable to communicate the consent.

The person having sexual intercourse on the pretext of a false promise of marriage would amount to rape and he will be punished under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The consent is obtained by the misconception of fact under Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.  Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 has defined consent in negative terms, as it states that consent is not intended to be consent when it is given under fear of injury or misconception of the fact and the person doing the act knows or has the reason to believe that the consent was given in consequence of fear or misconception of fact. Consent implies the freedom of judgement and deliberation. The consent is only free when the person is not blinded by anger or deceived or ignorant or subject to duress. When a person had sexual intercourse on account of a false pretext of marriage, it is clearly a misconception of the fact and such misconception of fact has no value. It may arise out of fraud or misrepresentation of facts. Consent plays a major role in criminal law, its absence or presence makes a difference of crime and innocence. Thus, the promise to marry (upon which the consent is given to have a sexual relationship) which is not fulfilled subsequently, will be a misrepresentation of fact. In Vijayan Pillai v State of Kerala¹ case, consent was defined as the ‘active will’ in the mind of a person to act on the knowledge of what is to be done.

Nowadays, our society gets more influenced by western countries. People may accept free sexual relations with each other while still being unmarried and the law acknowledges live-in relationships too. Choosing to enter a premarital sexual relationship is a part of individual autonomy but the issue arises only when there is a consenting relationship based on misrepresentation of the promise of marriage.

JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS

There are various judgements pronounced by the various courts of the country regarding the misconception of fact on the false promise of marriage. In Naushad v State of Uttar Pradesh² case, the accused committed sexual intercourse with the aggrieved party by giving false assurance that he would marry her but after she got pregnant, he refused to marry her. It is evident in this case that the aggrieved party had sexual relation with the accused on the promise of marriage but the accused never intended to marry her and had sexual intercourse with her consent which was based on a misconception of fact as defined in Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, so it amounts to rape.

In Yedla Srinivasa Rao v State of AP³, the victim use to cook in her sister’s house during the daytime. The accused used to visit the house and persuade the victim to have sexual intercourse by telling her that he would marry her. The accused had forced the intercourse without her will or consent and the accused promised to marry her. When she became pregnant he refused to marry her. The SC observed that it was a false promise made by the accused and the intention even from the beginning was not honest and the consent obtained from the victim is not valid consent so this act amount to rape. In Deepak Gulati v State of Haryana⁴ case, it was stated that intercourse under the promise to marry constitutes rape only if from the initial stage the accused had no intention to keep the promise. The accused is convicted only if the intention is mala fide.

Clause fourthly of Section 375 of IPC will apply when the accused had impersonated the husband of the victim and the victim gives the consent believing him to be a man to whom she is or believes to be lawfully wedded. Thus, the accused who knew that he is not the husband but represented himself to be the husband, is liable for rape.

LEGAL POSITION IN INDIA

Section 114 A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1972 provides that in the case of rape under Section 375 of IPC if the victim states in her evidence before the court that she did not consent then the court shall presume that the victim did not consent for the act. The false promise to marry is clearly a misconception of fact so the court shall not take the consent into account. But many contrary judgements have been given on consent obtained from the misconception of fact like in Jayanti Rani Panda v State of WB⁵ case a fully grown girl consented to the act of sexual intercourse on a promise of marriage and continued to indulge in such activity until she got pregnant, there is no misconception of fact and Section 90 cannot help. However, sometimes the strict interpretation of without consent may be punishable as rape so there must be an amendment in legislation like sexual intercourse with the victim on the pretext of a false promise of marriage so that the accused may not be acquitted of rape.

According to the survey conducted by The Hindu⁶, 25% of rape cases filed are the breach of promise to marry. Some male activists argue that these are false cases framed against the accused and could be treated as false rape cases. They also argue that Section 375 is an exhaustive provision under IPC where each explanation has its own meaning and it is distinct from one another and there is only narrow scope of a misconception of a fact, the victim is aware of the facts and circumstance of the act. It cannot be held invalid on a mere false promise.

CONCLUSION

Rape is considered to be a grave offence that has long-lasting effects on the minds of the victims. Rape reduces a woman to an animal used for sexual desires so it must be punished severely. In various cases, it has been seen that sexual intercourse has occurred on the false promise of marriage. If these are not punished then more and more crimes would occur so there must be a proper legislative amendment to deal with the accused who committed sexual intercourse with consent on the false promise of marriage. This sexual exploitation attacks the modesty of a woman. It must not be a chance for any person to exploit a woman in the name of a false promise of marriage. Thus, the accused should be punished for rape under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 so that sexual intercourse based on the false promise of marriage will be prevented in the future.

---

CITATIONS

1. HC: CRL.A No. 1851 of 2006.
2. AIR 2014: SC 384.
3. SC Appeal (crl.)  1369 of 2004.
4. AIR 2013; SC 2071.
5. 984 Cri LJ 1535 (Cal).
6. Rukmini S, ‘The many shades of rape cases in Delhi’ The Hindu (New Delhi, 29 July 2014), https://www.thehindu.com/data/The-many-shades-of-rape-cases-in-Delhi/article60437026.ece.

This article is written by Sree Lekshmi B J, a third-year law student from Sastra University, Thanjavur.

Introduction

Social Security is defined as the protection or security that is provided by a community to its members, ensuring that they have proper access to healthcare and a surety of a steady and regular income, especially during unemployment or post-retirement phases. It is classified as a basic human right by the United Nations. It is a benefaction-based system that supports sureties in case of unemployment, health issues, and pensions.

Since the beginning of civilization, humans have faced numerous economic breakdowns due to pandemics, natural disasters, and even unemployment. These breakdowns are a big threat to the economy even in the 21^st century. Through time we have seen that economic breakdowns have been predicted before they occurred, and hence the community as a whole started to create securities in form of food, finances, and even cattle, to be able to provide themselves with the security of a basic rightful living. With the advancement of times, and a formal specification of human rights, kingdoms and governments started to support the social security of their people, for ensuring a rightful living.

Types of Securities

• Traditional- Securities that are provided through friends and relatives, assets, work, or donation-driven charities are traditional securities or sureties.

• Modern- With the advancement in socio-economic status and development of cities, different organizations came up to provide their members with various economic sureties. Organizations, governments, and so on are modern types of security providers.

Beginning of ‘Social Security‘

With the discovery of the Americas, the English colonialists in the early 1600s brought with them their laws to set up a suitable system of governance. These laws were mostly based on providing support for the poor based on the taxes collected. But with the rise in slavery at the same time as they arrived, the lawmakers discriminated against the poor slaves from the poor whites. The slaves were regarded as undeserving of any support. During this era, the support that was provided was done in the most appalling way to discourage people from using it. People who used these services had their assets confiscated, and lost their voting and free movement privileges.

With the end of the American Civil War and after the confederacy surrendered and joined the Union, the then U.S. Government introduced a pension for the disabled Union veterans of the war, widows, and children of the soldiers who died during the war, on the other hand, the Confederate soldiers created and funded their own pension system. The pension for the Union soldiers depended upon the type of disability and their military rank, the lowest pension was $8 per month for a totally disabled private (lowest rank in the military). With the passage of the Dependent and Disability Pension Act in 1890 by the U.S. Congress, the earlier pension system was changed, and the veteran and other eligible people for pension received a lump sum amount of pension for the time between leaving the military and applying for a pension. Therefore, the Civil War Pensions can be classified as the first official Social Security system introduced.

International Labour Convention on Social Security 1952

In 1952, the International Labour Convention, an agency under the United Nations, stipulated the minimum standards of social security that should be provided. It is the only international instrument that supports basic social security support. These nine basic supports are-

1. Medical Care
2. Sickness Benefits
3. Unemployment Benefits
4. Old Age Benefits
5. Employment Injury Benefits
6. Family Benefits
7. Maternity Benefits
8. Invalidism Benefits
9. Survivor’s Benefits.

Social Security in India

The Indian social security system has been developed using the western example and systems that prevailed in modern industries. With the pressure and urges from social reformers, business leaders, and welfare organizations, social security was introduced in India and became the responsibility of the state to provide for the social security of the citizens of the country, as per Article 43 of the Indian Constitution. Numerous schemes and programs prevail through various laws and regulations in India, yet only a smaller section of the Indian masses receive the security provided by the government.

Policy for Social Security in India

• National Provident Funds
• Universal Social Security Schemes
• Employers Liability Schemes
• Insurance based on Resources and Beneficiaries Pooling Risks

Benefits to Workmen in India

1. Pension – In India, there are provisions for provident funds for employees engaged in corporations and are overseen by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organization, established within the Ministry of Labour and Employment. Schemes under the provident fund organization apply to all businesses with over 20 employees, and contribution to these funds is mandatory to be followed by the firms as well as the employees if they make INR 15,000 a month, while it is voluntary if they make more than that amount. Schemes provided under the Employees’ Provident Fund Organizations-

• The Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952– This is contributed by the employer and the employee. The employer contributes from 1.63% up to 3.67%, whereas the employee contributed from 10% to 12%.
• The Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1955– This is contributed by the employer and the government. The employer contributes 8.33%, whereas the government contributes 1.16%.
• The Employees’ Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976– Under this scheme, only the employer contributes 0.5%. Neither the employee nor the government contributes any amount. The pensions that are offered are- 1) Pension for Disability or Superannuation, 2) Pension for Military Widows, 3) Pension for Children and 4) Pension for Orphans.

2. Medical Benefit and Insurance – With the lack of universal healthcare in India, i.e., no free healthcare for the Indian masses and to provide the funds to ensure proper medical care to employees and their families; the government implemented the Employees’ State Insurance Act 1948. It also made available monthly cash benefits in phases of sicknesses, pregnancy, and in cases of deaths or injuries to employees in organizations with at least 10 employees. The monthly coverage was extended to all employees that made less than INR 21,000 a month under the Employees’ State Insurance (Central) Amendment Act, 2016. Maternity benefits were also improved under this Act.

3. Benefit for Disability – Employers have been mandated to compensate employees and their families in case of injuries or death at the workplace under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923. Seclude I part I and II of the Employees’ Compensation Act provide for injuries that include partial or permanent disablement, while Section III, Part A, B, and C provide for Occupational diseases. Compensation for disabilities suffered due to employment is estimated as below;

• In the case of permanent disability; 60% of the monthly wage is multiplied by the age of the disabled, or an amount of INR 90,000, whichever is more.
• In case of death; 50% of the monthly wage multiplied by the age of the deceased or an amount of INR 80,000, whichever is more.

4. Benefit for Maternity – For women, maternity leave in India is a paid maternity leave that lasts up to 26 weeks for the first two children and 12 weeks for the third child, as enforced through the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017. This Act also provides for maternity leave for women who have adopted a child less than 3 months as well as for mothers who underwent surrogacy. Every woman is entitled to receive the average daily wage during the timespan of the maternity leave and a medical bonus of INR 3,500, as per the maternity Benefit Act, 1961. A 6-week paid maternity leave is also applicable in cases of miscarriage, and a month of paid leave due to medical complications.

5. Gratuity – A corporation with at least 10 employees must support an added 15 days of wages to those employees who have worked for at least 5 years with the firm. It is a cash benefit provided by the firm to the employee as a lump sum. However, payment of gratuity can be refused if the employee has been terminated due to misconduct. The formula to calculate gratuity is (15 X last drawn salary X years of service) ÷ 30.

Conclusion

Social Security is an important instrument in supporting a sustainable life for all people in need of such support, and to feel accepted at the workplace. Irrespective of whether a person is above the poverty line or not, Social Security should be provided to all citizens and eligible non-citizens. It is not a free money handout from the government, it is the social support that provides for the better living standards of people in the community, so there are no disruptions in the peaceful continuance of society. With the legislation brought abroad and in India, the governments have ensured that their people do not suffer or are not being taken advantage of by corporations. Maternity long and paid leave for women and provident fund are some of the policies that have been updated every few years to keep up with the changing thought environment of the people. With such dynamic upliftment, the interest of the employer and the employee are considered equal with the core focus on the joint satisfaction and interest of both.

References

1. Facts on Social Security, International Labour Organization, https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_067588.pdf.
2. Civil War Pensions, Centre for Civil War studies, Virginia Tech https://www.essentialcivilwarcurriculum.com/civil-war-pensions.html.
3. Civil War Pensions and Disability, Ohio State Law Journal Vol 62:109.
4. Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948.
5. The Workmen Compensation Act, 1923.
6. Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102).

This article is written by Namay Khanna, a 3^rd year BBA LLB (Hons.) student at Symbiosis Law School, Pune.

Introduction

Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, the whole world including India had gone into lockdown. Even the courts were shut down for a while in March when directed by the Supreme Court of India. The centre and the state governments had put down restrictions that made it difficult for the courts to function. As in the Anita Kushwaha v. Pushap Sadan¹ case, it was declared by the Supreme Court, “It is the constitutional right of rural (and other) citizens to ‘Access to Justice’ under Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India”. The courts have found a way to prevent human interference and still work exceptionally. Several courts were largely shut down, and only urgent hearings were being held. A few states permitted open courts to operate with partial hearings, but this was terminated due to an increase in cases, and virtual courts were fully implemented instead.

The pandemic paved way for the judiciary to work in virtual mode to prevent the contagiousness of the virus. However, India had its first virtual court in Faridabad. The Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software was unveiled by the President of India on November 26, 2019, and it has the ability to translate legal documents from English into nine regional languages and vice versa.

The Supreme Court of India’s official multilingual mobile application will also be made available to give lawyers and litigants precise real-time access to case status, review screens, judgments, daily orders, etc. Although the judiciary has seen several technical advancements, such as the ability to record testimony through video conferencing², the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic has had a severe impact on virtual courts.

Positive impacts of the virtual courts

In the wake of the pandemic, the virtual courts have come to the rescue to deliver justice and continue the proceedings of the cases. They have become a mode of advancement of the judicial system through technology. The virtual courts have helped to maintain social distancing and decreased the risk of exposure to the virus.

The judges, counsels, and parties of a proceeding are joined in a video conferencing website within the given time. This process reduces the chances of corruption and brings more transparency. The cost-effectiveness allows people to approach the courts, since, the parties wouldn’t have to travel every time. These courts are also known as E-courts and e- justice is considered to be a stepping stone to e-governance. e-courts make it easier to achieve a number of goals that will aid the judicial administration in the allocation of cases, reduce litigation delay and cost, contribute databases, guarantee e-filing and e-notices, and make witnesses available through video conferencing, create digitally signed court orders, and digitize ADR. Thanks to technology, the open courts in many nations are able to function and serve as a medium to safeguard citizens’ rights throughout the pandemic.

Virtual hearings are used to safeguard the safety of the witnesses too. Court workflow management has been successfully automated with the use of virtual courts. As a result, it would contribute to improving the administration of courts and cases. This also gives the litigants ability to attend the proceedings from their office or home.

The court’s ability to operate around the clock is one of the main benefits we’ll have in the future too. There is a massive backlog of court cases, and a prolonged wait for justice causes residents to lose faith in the legal system. The method will gain momentum as a result, and cases can be decided in a timely way.

Virtual Courts versus Open Court

With the ongoing trend of the virtual courts, a very important question has been raised i.e., whether the virtual courts would replace the open courts. Many bar associations across the nation, from the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association to the Gujarat High Court Advocates Association, have acknowledged the challenges experienced by attorneys during hearings through virtual courts.

It was also stated by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud that virtual courts can’t completely replace open courts. The first reason is that many advocates don’t have access to the internet in many areas and India is still in the process of technological development. High-speed internet isn’t available in all the areas all across the nation.

Secondly, many advocates don’t have the basic proficiency in technological skills which can be said as a major drawback since it would be difficult for them to shift to the virtual proceedings.

Thirdly, the current state of our legal system prevents the adoption of the idea of virtual courts because even an open court system cannot handle the massive backlog of unresolved cases. Fourthly, despite the fact that virtual courts and the open court system are not mutually exclusive, people’s privacy has not been respected. The legal system is geared toward litigants. It is particularly challenging for litigants, who typically hail from rural areas, to comprehend that their case is resolved without their attorney being in court. Although some attorneys may feel at ease in virtual courts, the clients still are not prepared. Justice consumers have been completely disregarded throughout the process.

Fifth, the people of India, whose cases have been languishing for long years, lack confidence in the current system.

Sixth, affluent law firms, corporations, government agencies, and legal tycoons may be able to take advantage of virtual courts more so than regular attorneys. Therefore, even if the Supreme Court intends to permanently establish virtual courts in India, it should have started by providing technical training to the lower judiciary, specifically the district courts and taluka courts at the bottom. The people’s trust must be earned at the grassroots level. If they are content, moving on to the next level would be simple.

It is very appreciable that the Apex court is understanding and putting in efforts to improve the grass root level problems if the virtual court system comes into play. However, litigation plays a crucial role in the judicial system. Judiciary being the strongest pillar of democracy, has the obligation to safeguard the litigation process in India. Due to these few issues, it can be very difficult for virtual courts to completely replace open courts. The clients of the advocates invest their trust in them and the advocates might find it a little bit difficult to connect to their clients and find proper information in online mode. Along with this, the virtual court system has its own challenges.

Challenges

Infrastructure: India does not have the complete infrastructure to completely depend on the online mode. The most problematic thing is the bandwidth. Also, the video conferencing apps have third-party interference which may lead to the breach of data i.e., data privacy lacks here.

Information Technology Infrastructure: The new evidence legislation concerning electronic evidence is still in flux and has not yet been finalized, as evidenced by the assignment of the question of the application of Section 65B of the Certification for the Admissibility of Electronic Evidence to a wider bench³. In circumstances of electronic filing and data storage, it raises the worry of tampering with paperwork and paper records.

Practical issues: If it is properly accessed by the citizen, virtual courts are an endeavor by the judiciary to convince the public that we value their time. Statistics lead us to conclude that our Indian lawyers lack the necessary experience in this field, and their law degrees don’t necessarily prepare them for it. There is no mention of access for those without internet connectivity. Even the fact that up to 50% of Indians lack Internet connection seems to be overlooked. Despite having the second-highest percentage of Internet users in the nation, that is.

Some may contend that even someone without access to the internet should go to someone who does and use it, which is unquestionably preferable for a rural resident than going to a distant court. However, the internet gap continues to be a significant barrier for the majority of individuals to access or understand virtual court hearings.

The Supreme Court ruled in Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. the State of Maharashtra⁴, that all claims presented before the courts, whether civil, criminal or other, must be heard in open court because “Public trial in open court is undoubtedly essential for the healthy, objective and fair administration of justice”.

In Swapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India⁵, the Bombay court held that only the cases with urgency would be dealt with due to the wake of the pandemic in the month of April 2020 and dissented on granting the bail which was filed under section 439, Cr.P.C6. There were 2 issues that were understood via this case. First, it was claimed that only urgent bail cases are being decided by the courts as a result of the epidemic location. Second, giving the applicant bail would put both his life and the lives of others in jeopardy because he might not be able to return home because of the lockdown. In order to avoid these scenarios, he was not granted bail. Though it is something to consider, there should be no doubt that the fundamental rights of a person seeking legal assistance have always been maintained in the legal system. If even one person’s well-being is hampered by the court’s conclusion, the judgment is open to public review.

Conclusion

The wake of the pandemic has paved a new path to the development of the judiciary through technology. The virtual court system is accessible and cost-effective. It also helps to curb social evil i.e., corruption in the judicial system. The travel burdens would be reduced for the people who have to approach the court. However, there are more than equal chances that these courts may not be permanently reliable as India is a developing nation, it still lacks technological advancement and there are people who are poor in understanding the working of the technology. There is a high possibility that the parties might not be having high bandwidth in their localities. Also, it is important to ensure that the virtual court systems shall be user-friendly and it can be said that, with the given situation in India, it would be impossible to rely completely on the virtual court systems as there are many challenges present with that respect.

---

Citations

1. (2016) 8 SCC 509.
2. State of Maharashtra v. Prafulla B. Desai (Dr.), (2003) 4 SCC 601.
3. The Indian Evidence Act 1872, s. 65(B).
4. (1966) 3 SCR 744.
5. (2018) 10 SCC 628].
6. The Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s. 439.

This article is written by K. Mihira Chakravarthy, 1st year BA LLB student from Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University (DSNLU).

CASE NUMBER

Crl.A. No 14/2013

CITATION

W.P. (C) 3918/ 2020

BENCH

Justice Pratibha M. Singh

DECIDED ON

12. 04. 2021

RELEVANT ACT/SECTION

Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Article 21 of the Constitution.

BRIEF FACTS

The petition was filed by the petitioner for the removal of the judgment titled, ‘Custom v Jorawar Singh Mundy’ from the platforms such as Google, Indian Kanoon, and Vlex.in. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is of Indian origin but an American citizen. He claims that he is indulged in portfolios of real estate etc. When he came to India, a case under Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985¹ was made against him. After that, he was acquitted by the trial court under this case. the decision of the trial court resulted in an appeal before the high court. The high court decided to uphold the acquittal of the petitioner.

According to the petitioner’s claims, he or she returned to the country and attended the University of San Diego School of Law to further pursue his or her legal education. After that, he understood that he was at a severe disadvantage because any prospective employer looking to check his record before hiring him might easily find the court’s verdict by conducting a google search. Despite having a strong academic background, the petitioner claims that he has been unable to find employment that meets his expectations. He attributes this inability to the fact that this judgment is publicly available online.

The petitioner also issued the legal notice to the platforms such as Google India Private Ltd, Google LLC, Indian Kanoon, and vLex.in. The website of vLex.in contended that they have removed the said judgment but it is still available on other platforms. To recognize the petitioner’s Right to Privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution², the prayer in this writ petition is to direct the removal of the abovementioned ruling from all respondent platforms.

ISSUE

Whether a court order can be removed from the online platforms?

DECISION

The court held that the charges brought against the petitioner were dismissed from the case. Despite having been ultimately found not guilty in the case by the aforementioned judgment, this Court believes that the petitioner is still entitled to some interim protection while the legal issues are still pending adjudication by this Court because of the irreparable harm that may be done to his social life, career prospects, and legal standing.

The court directed the respondent no. 2 and 3 to remove the judgment titled, ‘Custom v. Jorawar Singh Mundy’ from their search results. Whereas, Indiankanoon was directed to block the said judgment from being retrieved by using search engines such as Google, Yahoo, till the date of the next hearing.

CONCLUSION

A person’s life will be as bad as hell if information about their criminal history or any occurrence that would have caused the public to have a bad opinion of them is made public. He or she will be imprisoned in their former lives. India has experienced rapid development in recent years. This development occurred on top of the nation’s digital technologies roots. The internet and smartphones have integrated seamlessly into our daily lives. Additionally, courts are now acknowledging that Article 21 covers access to the internet. Some of us would prefer to move on from our pasts and forget about them. The issue emerges when a person’s past mistakes chain him and causes him to make the same mistakes over and over again.

The Right to be forgotten aims to provide assistance in this issue. The scope of the Right to be forgotten should be expanded and must include removing everything that is “irrelevant, erroneous, or inadequate.” It should not be limited to “sensitive personal data.” In this instance, the petitioner’s attorney has highlighted the fact that, in the absence of supporting legislation, the public is likely to disagree with the petitioner’s request and support the right to privacy and freedom of expression. According to Akshat Bajpai, a lawyer for one of the petitioners, big multinational corporations operate differently in Europe than they do in India when it comes to following the law. It is essential to secure someone’s privacy given how quickly technology is developing. The right to be forgotten ensures that an individual’s privacy will be protected and supports their right to free speech. The establishment of such a right in India will assist the populace in managing their “digital footprint” and address the problem of data security and misuse that has recently emerged.

---

REFERENCES

1. The Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985.
2. The constitution of India, 1950, Art. 21

This article is written by Prerna Pahwa, a student at Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, New Delhi.

CITATION

78/2019; 77/2019; 79/2019; 76/2019

BENCH

Justice Manojit Bhuyan; Justice Soumitra Saikia

FACTS AND BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

In the present-day, internet and social media platforms have gained importance over a period of time. The government’s frequent action of shutting down internet services for one region or another on the ground of ‘Public Safety’ has now become a hindrance in the life of people. Despite recognition of Right to Internet under Article 21 of Indian Constitution, it failed to provide relief to citizens. Due to the widespread protests in regions of north eastern areas, it led to chaotic situation in country, resultantly government was forced to shut down internet services as claimed by government of various states. In the instant case there were four petitioners namely Advocate Banashree Gogoi, Deva Kanya Doley, Randeep Sharma and Journalist Ajit Kumar Bhuyan who filed a Public Interest Litigation to challenge the notifications of Government of State of Assam that suspended the internet services on 11^th December 2019. Government banned internet services in 10 of its districts for a complete day and reasoned its action as to stop further protest that may happen due to the newly amended Citizenship Act.

LAWS INVOLVED

Article 32: The right of every citizen to move to Supreme Court if his/her any fundamental right is violated. Supreme Court can issue writs to any government authority, private authority or private individual for that matter.

Article 226: It provides power to High Court for enforcement of fundamental rights or other legal rights by way of issuing writs to any government authority, private authority or private individual for that matter.

Indian Telegraph Act, 1885: It provides that Indian Government has exclusive jurisdiction over maintain, establishment, operating, licensing and oversight over systems either wired or wireless. 

Section 5 (2) Indian Telegraph Act, 1885: It gives authority to governments both at central and state level for preventing of transmission of messaging during a situation of public emergency or for public safety or in the interests of sovereignty, integrity and security of India.

Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety), 2017: It empowers the government to shutdown internet services in any particular region by way of notification based up on public emergency.  

ISSUE

Whether the State Government of Assam had enough reasons for contentment of public to justify the further continuation of ban on internet services?

DECISION OF COURT

It was recalled by court that an order dated 17-12-2019 has already been passed, that despite of restoration of normal conditions in state the Government of Assam refused to lift the ban on internet services; this results in freezing the entire working of cities. Due to the problems faced by many locals of state in their day-to-day lives, the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed an order that suggests the state government to restore internet services for fewer hours and to justify their action of continuing suspension. It was contented by petitioner that the term ‘Law and Order’ and term ‘Public order’ have different meanings and State Government is not making any effort for assessing the situation for peaceful ‘Public Order’. Whereas, State Government claimed it reviewed its decision where they put forward those inputs from various agencies and a meeting among State Authorities regarding the issue led to decision’s continuation.

It was argued the restoration of broadband services and lifting of curfew itself shows that ‘grave’ law and order situation has already waved away. Court stated that respondents have no reasons to justify that internet services disrupts law and order situation. Finally, court states that internet services play a major role in lives of people with advancement of Science and Technology, shutting down internet services would only cause further chaos in lives of people. The state government when issued notifications there was reasonable apprehension regarding law and order in society. Law surely does permit suspension of internet services whenever necessary however, in the current situation the State Authorities failed to assess the situation and to justify the continuation of ban on internet services. Court directed the Government of State of Assam to restore internet services on 19-10-2019 at 5.00 P.M. State is free to take any steps for stopping any violence that may take place in the future. The decision by court protects and extends the ambit of an individual Right to Receive and impart information providing no exception to state’s justification for ban. It gives a broad view over the protection of fundamental rights not based on mere apprehension of threat to ‘Public Safety’. The government must have enough reasons for internet shutdowns or for hindrance in way of any fundamental right if it failed to contentment of public for any action that harms one’s fundamental rights, it may suffer consequences.    

This case analysis is written by Simran Gulia, currently pursuing BA LLB from Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies.