THE VIPS LAW BLOG calls for blogs on a rolling basis on any contemporary issue in laws.

ABOUT

The VIPS Law Blog is an initiative by the Vivekananda School of Law and Legal Studies (VSLLS), VIPS seeks to host original contributions consisting of in-depth analysis and interpretation of legal issues and concepts. The mission of the blog is to promote academic scholarship through the development of legal reasoning and argumentation. The platform hopes to create an environment conducive to the exchange of opinion amongst law students, academicians, jurists, legal practitioners, and law and policy enthusiasts. We accommodate submissions that initiate, further, and transform discourse on matters of law. 

Guidelines for Authors

  1. All submissions and queries are to be emailed to vipslawblog@gmail.com
  2. The submission shall be authored by not more than 2 persons.
  3. The submission shall be made in .docx/word document format.
  4. The submission shall be in the English language.
  5. Word limit for the submission should be between 1200-1500 words will be preferred. However, longer submissions may be considered on a need basis. 
  6. The font style should be Garamond with font size 12 for submission with line spacing of 1.5 in justified format.
  7. The submission must have hyperlinks to sources, including any judgments, laws, treaties, or other legal texts which are referenced. Hyperlinks must link only to legal or respected news sources. The editors make the final decision over what constitutes a respectable source. 
  8. The submissions shall be properly structured with sub-headings/sub-topics.
  9. References that cannot be hyperlinked may be cited using Bluebook 21th Edition.
  10. The submissions will be accepted on a rolling basis throughout the year.
  11. The submission of the author/authors shall be the original work of the author and should not be plagiarized. 
  12. The Blog shall receive a disclaimer from the author that the submission has not been published on any other platform and shall not be placed for consideration before any other platform for the purpose of publication.
  13. The final publication of all submissions shall be subject to changes by the Editorial Board.
  14. The decision of the editorial board shall be final and binding.
  15. The blog reserves the right to reject and return the submission to the author/authors without feedback.
  16. The opinion/thoughts/ideas or any view of the author expressed and published on the VIPS Law Blog is not endorsed by the institution.
  17. The institution and the Editorial Board shall not be held responsible or accountable for the opinion expressed by the author on the VIPS Law Blog.
  18. The opinion/thoughts/ideas or any view of the author expressed and published on the VIPS Law Blog shall not be construed as legal advice.
  19. Along with the blog submission, the author(s) would be required to submit an abstract of 100-150 words describing the overview of the theme covered in their blog.
  20. A relevant photograph can be provided by the authors describing their manuscript. Accompanying the image is optional (we’ll include one if you want). If you wish to provide an image to go with your blog post, it should be attributed (provide image source URL), at least 200×200 pixels, JPG, or PNG format.
  21. If we publish your blog post, the Candidate has full rights to the content, including but not limited to editing, mixing, duplicating, using, or re-use it in whole or in part as he/she chooses. However, the copyright of the Blog once it is published would vest entirely with the VIPS Law Blog. 
  22. Though Cross-posting is allowed yet with the prior permission of the Editorial Board of the VIPS Law Blog. Due Credits must be given to VIPS Law Blog while cross-posting. It should be done in the following format:-  “This article/blog was first published on the VIPS Law Blog.”

CONTACT DETAILS

+919013965521

https://vipslawblog.wordpress.com/

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Alliance Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution invites articles for its newsletter bearing volume 1 issue 3.

ABOUT

The ACADR seeks to contribute to the vision of the Alliance School of Law, Alliance University of developing human beings who are technically sound, socially relevant, and emotionally strong thereby imbibing in themselves the requisite skills of alternative dispute resolution methods like active listening, understanding other’s point of view, discussions, empathy, rational thinking, solution-oriented approach, analytical understanding, and community interest.

THEME

“Judicial approaches towards recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards”

SUB-THEME

  • Landmark judgments and development of ADR in India.
  • Notable decisions by foreign courts on Commercial Arbitration.
  • Best international practices pertaining to the enforcement of arbitral awards against the State (Govt).

The above-mentioned sub-themes are not exhaustive in nature. The authors are free to write on any topic directly connected to the central theme of the Newsletter.

Submission Guidelines

  • Authors to submit final versions of their blog/article in MS Word format.
  • Word Limit: Minimum 700 & maximum 800 words including References.
  • Do not include a table of contents.
  • Font style: Times New Roman.
  • Title font size: 14.
  • Body font size: 12.
  • Line spacing: 1.5.
  • References/citations to be made using Bluebook 20th edition.
  • Usage of end notes, not foot notes.
  • End notes to be in Times New Roman, font size 10, and justified alignment.
  • Total no. of co-authors permitted: 2.
  • Plagiarism must be less than 10%.
  • By submitting material for publication, you guarantee that you are the original copyright holder of the work in question, and you own the legal rights to use the information. In case of any breach of copyright, the author shall bear the liability.
  • Alliance School of Law would not be charging any publication fee.
  • Authors will be informed about acceptance of their articles within 12 to 15 days from the submission date.

SUBMISSIONS LINK

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe-2BCJ6LQt-sJ175Erb_AorzvNYzOKLEm7NZ_OZPDeEgHfYg/viewform

SUBMISSIONS DEADLINE

June 15, 2022

CONTACT DETAILS

acadr@alliance.edu.in

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organizers

The Society for International Trade and Competition Law (‘SITC’) is an academic society of the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (‘WBNUJS’), Kolkata. Its aim is to increase awareness with respect to the two legal fields of competition and international trade law among law students and the public at large.

About the Blog Writing Competition

The blog teams of the NUJS Society for International Trade and Competition Law (SITC) and NUJS Intellectual Property and Technology Laws Society (IPTLS) are collaborating to organize a blog writing competition ‘CONFLUX’ wherein entries can be sent on the topic – ‘Intersection of IP and Competition Laws‘. 

Winning 5 entries will be published on both the IPTLS and SITC blogs. 

Concept Note

The two regimes of Competition and IP together work in a balance to safeguard market interests as well as promote innovation and thus through this collaboration both societies aim to promote discourse in this area.

Topics

  • Submissions must be on the interface of IP and competition laws. Some suggested broadheads are given below however authors are free to choose any topic of their choice.
    • Patent pools and competition
    • Licensing, FRAND terms, and competition
    • Competition aspects of royalties
    • Exhaustion of copyright and competition implications, etc.

Submission Guidelines

  • Word Limit: Not less than 1500 words
  • All submissions MUST provide in-text hyperlinks to the sources (available online) referred in the article.
  • In addition to such hyperlinks, endnotes MUST also be provided for all sources. These endnotes must be in the NUJS Law Review Format.
  • Co-authorship of up to two authors is allowed.
  • Articles should be divided into suitable headings to increase readability and navigation.

Formatting Guidelines

The submission must be in

  • Font: Times New Roman,
  • Alignment: Justified,
  • Font Size: Size 12,
  • Line Spacing: 1.5
  • Format: must be sent as a Word Document (version 2007 or beyond).

How to Submit?

  • Author details must NOT BE present in any form in the submitted word document.
  • Such details are to be provided ONLY in the body of the email, and should be as follows; Author’s Name, Uni/Institution/Firm/Place of Practice, Year of Study (if applicable), Contact email, and Contact no.
  • All submissions must ONLY be mailed to: submissions.conflux@gmail.com

Submission Deadline

Submit your entries by April 10, 2022.

Rewards

The Top 5 entries will be published on the IPTLS and SITC Blogs.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organisation

Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad is founded on the pillars of expertise, justice and service and is committed to imparting quality legal education confirming acclaimed International standards. Continuing the legacy of this Institution, the Centre for Consumer Rights and Marketing (CCRM) came to be established in the year 2019.

This Centre has been established to advocate and raise awareness about Consumerism, redressal mechanisms and ethical marketing, not only to benefit SLSH but provide opportunities to students of all institutions to increase their awareness. Team CCRM consists of members from first year through the fifth year along with our esteemed faculty in charge Dr. M Rajanikanth. 

About the Competition

“BLAWG”: A Blog Writing Competition

Topic

Participants are free to choose any topic related to Consumer Rights or Marketing. 

Eligibility

Open to all college students

Registration Fee

No registration fee

Click here to register.

Important Deadlines

  • Last date for registration: February 5, 2022 by 11:59 PM
  • Last date for blog submission: February 7, 2022 by 11:59 PM

How to Submit?

Mode of Submission: E-mail (ccrm@slsh.edu.in)

Register through the link given at the end of this post.

Prizes

  • 1st Place: INR 1000/-
  • 2nd Place: INR 500/-

Contact details

Manasa Sriram: +919003140142

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About IRCCL

The Indian Review of Corporate and Commercial Laws (IRCCL) is a blog that publishes articles on current issues relating to corporate law, dispute
resolution, trade & investment law, taxation law, labour law, competition law and insolvency & bankruptcy law.

About the Competition

What makes this competition particularly unique is its upper word limit of 2,500 words, through which we hope to have a premier focus on novel content. To this effect, the themes of this edition have been designed to promote the conversation around certain key contemporary issues in the commercial disputes space.

Eligibility

This competition is open to all students in their 3rd, 4th or 5th year (five-year course) and 2nd or 3rd year (three-year course) in any recognized university across the world.

Theme

Refer to the brochure given below to know about the specific themes.

Submission

To submit, click here: https://airtable.com/shrQP4FkmogFhGhEh

Note: There is no registration fee for this competition.

Co-Authorship

Co-authorship of up to two authors is permitted.

Prizes

  1. First Prize: INR 10,000 + Opportunity to intern with the dispute resolution practice at Khaitan & Co. + certificate of merit
  2. Second Prize: INR 7,000 + certificate of merit
  3. Third Prize: INR 5,000 + certificate of merit
  4. Fourth – Fifth / Tenth Prize (depending on the number of submissions): Certificate of merit
  5. Prize winning articles will also be published on the IRCCL blog!

Note: Month and duration of the internship will be decided at the sole discretion of Khaitan & Co.

Important Dates

  1. Last Date of Submission: 31 January 2022
  2. Declaration of Results: 14 March 2022 (tentative)

Contact Details

Mail to: Queries, if any, may be directed to our dedicated e-mail address for the competition, i.e. competitions@irccl.in, with the subject ‘Query – IRCCL Competition’.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Chair on Consumer Law, NLUD

The Chair on Consumer Law has been established at the National Law University, Delhi by the Department of Consumer Affairs, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, Government of India in the year 2019.

The Chair was set up to act as a Think Tank for Research and Policy related issues on Consumer Law & Practice, and to develop Consumer Law as a distinct subject of study both at Under Graduate & Post Graduate levels.

About the Blog Writing Competition

On the occasion of National Consumer Day which is being celebrated on December 24, 2021, the Chair on Consumer law, NLU Delhi (“the Chair”) is organising a Blog Writing Competition. The best two entries would be given the Certificate of Appreciation by the Chair accepted blogs and published in the Second Issue of the Newsletter of the Chair. The Chair has already published the first issue of its newsletter in October 2021.

Theme

Know your Consumer Rights

General Guidelines:

  1. Co-authorship is permitted. (Maximum of two authors)
  2. The submission shall be in English language.
  3. The word limit for the article is 1200 words. However, longer submissions may be considered on a need basis.  The word limit is inclusive of the footnotes. 
  4. Any uniform format of citation can be adhered to for the purpose of citations.
  5. The submission must have hyperlinks to sources, including any judgments, laws, treaties or other legal texts which are referenced. Hyperlinks must link only to legal or respected news sources. The Editorial Board [“Board”] will make the final decision over what constitutes a respectable source. References which cannot be hyperlinked may be cited using any uniform style of formatting.
  6. The submission of the author/authors shall be the original work of the author and should not be plagiarized. All submissions will undergo strict online plagiarism check.
  7. The authors must also include a declaration as to the bona fides of their submission in their email. A sample declaration to that effect can be: “The article/blog is an original work of the author(s). I(We) certify that my(our) submission is original, has not been published elsewhere, and is not under review or consideration elsewhere.” 
  8. The final publication of all submissions shall be subject to changes by the Board.
  9. The Board reserves the right to summarily reject or return the submission to the author/authors without feedback for non-compliance with these guidelines. 
  10. In case of any dispute, the decision of the Board shall be final and binding.
  11. The opinion/thoughts/ideas or any view of the author expressed and published on the blog are respective views of the authors. The institution or the Board shall not be held responsible or accountable for the opinion expressed by the author on the blog article.
  12. A relevant photograph can be provided by the authors describing their blog submission. Accompanying the image is optional (The Board may include one if accepted by the author). If the author wishes to provide an image to go with her blog article, the photo should be attributed (provide image source URL), be at least 200×200 pixels in either .JPG or .PNG format.
  13. If the blog article is published, the author has full rights to the content, including but not limited to edit, mix, duplicate, use, or re-use it in whole or in part as he/she chooses. However, copyright of the blog articles, once it is published, would vest entirely with the Chair on Consumer Law, NLUD.
  14. Cross-publishing is allowed although with the prior permission of the Board, due credits must be given to the site of publication of the newsletter while cross posting. It should be done in the following format :-  “this article/blog was first published on the …… Blog.”

 Formatting Guidelines

  1. Body: Font – Garamond, Font size- 12, Line spacing- 1.5, Alignment- Justified
  2. Footnotes: Font – Garamond, Font size- 10, Line spacing- 1, Alignment- Justified

Submission Guidelines

  1. The Author/s are required to email the manuscript to consumerchair@nludelhi.ac.in.
  2. All entries should be submitted in .doc or .docx format.
  3. Last date for submission is December 30, 2021.
  4. The best entry will get a Certification of Appreciation and the top two blogs shall be published in the upcoming issue of the Newsletter of the Chair on Consumer Law, NLU Delhi.
  5. The author(s) shall specify in the mail body:
  • Names of author(s).
  • Name of the College/University.
  • Email address and contact number. 

Last Date to Send Entry

December 30, 2021

Contact Details

Mail at: consumerchair@nludelhi.ac.in

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

INTRODUCTION

Sedition law got its existence during the era of 1590 in England. It became a part of Indian statute by the arrival of British rule and got added to Indian penal code, 1870 as section 124A. But the visage of the law got redefined once when the case of sedition was charged on Bal Gangadhar Tilak, where the judge presiding over the trial widened the scope of law, equating disaffection to dis-loyalty. Again in 1922, Mohandas Karam Chand Gandhi was charged with sedition for showing disaffection towards British raj by instigating people against their rule via non- violent method.

Later, when India attained its freedom during 1947, there was wide discussion taking place on right to freedom; the use of sedition was debated. Personalities like Sardar Vallabhai Patel, Rajagopal Achari had supported the idea of sedition. But on the other hand individuals like KM munshi and Somnath Lahri was against the law of sedition. Eventually, the idea of sedition got abrogated from constitution but still exists in Indian penal code, 1870.  The seditious charges are still applied on people in India but, in Britain where the law got its origin got scrapped in 2009. Case of Arundati Roy, Kanaihya Kumar, Aseem Trivedi, Umar Khalid, Dhaval Patel etc. are some examples. The debate of whether sedition is good or bad is still on going.

DEFINITION OF SEDITION

Sedition is defined as an apparent act like speech, organisation which can led to rebellious activities against the established order. It can also include demolition of constitution and can also often led to incitement of serious mutiny against the authorities. Sedition can be any type of furore even if it is not aimed at direct violence against the law. Seditious words in written format is called as seditious libel. A seditionist is defined as a person who is engaged in the interest of sedition.

SEDITION UNDER SECTION 124 A OF INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1870 : PROVISIONS AND PUNISHMENT

The term sedition is defined under 124 A of IPC as:

            “Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government shall be punishable with life imprisonment”.

It is considered as a reasonable restriction on freedom of speech which was drafted by Thomas Babington Macaulay. It is termed as a high value crime in Indian penal code. It is a cognizable offence in which the offender can be arrested without any warrant and it also allows the police to start investigation without any permission from court.  Sedition is defined as disloyalty towards the authorities. The punishment available for the crime of sedition are it being a non- bail able offence, three years of imprisonment to imprisonment for life added with a fine. The person accused with the crime of sedition cannot apply for a government job or have to live their lives without passport and have to attend the legal proceedings whenever necessary.

SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES

An act is termed as seditious if it satisfies the following aspects:

  • It should instigate hatred or discontent against the government.
  • It should results in violence or public insurgency.
  • It can include seditious libel: written or spoken sedition which includes posters etc.
  • Raising of slogans against government.
  • A speech of an individual that incite violence and disturbs public order.

DEFENCES AVAILABLE FOR THE LAW OF SEDITION

The possible defences that are available for sedition are:

  1. He/ she didn’t tried to attempt disaffection or disloyalty.
  2. The disaffection is not against the government.
  3. He/she is not the one who made the remarks against the Government.

SEDITION AND RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION

Article 19 (1) (a) of the Indian constitution states that:  “all citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression”. It also provides the right of a citizen to express their views through any modes like:  writing, films, pictures etc. it is deemed as a basic, fundamental right of every citizens of the country. But these rights are not absolute and can be restricted by the norms of reasonable restrictions under article 19(2).

  The sedition law was formulated during the era of British to impose restriction on people to not to speak against government policies. Many famous personalities like Bal Gangadhar Tilak. Mahatma Gandhi etc. was charged with the law of sedition. Currently there are various issues in which the law of sedition was misused to curtail people from excersing their right to speak against government policies. There is always an overlap that exists in case of sedition and article 19 (1) (a).

Long years back, during the drafting of fundamental rights, Sardar Vallabhai Patel urged to include sedition as a reasonable restriction under article 19 (2). Due to the majority opposition, the sedition charges were excluded from article 19 (2).  Currently there are over 8 reasonable restrictions. They are:

  1. Sovereignty and integrity of the country.
  2. Public order.
  3. Contempt of court.
  4. Defamation
  5. Friendly relation with foreign states.
  6.  Decency and morality.
  7. Incitement to violence.

From this we can learn that sedition is not a ground for restriction against the right of free speech. But at the same time it can bring a curtail to our right of free speech if it incite public order. Article 124 A of Indian penal code, 1860 states that:

 “Any person by words either spoken or written or by signs or visible representation or otherwise bring or attempt to bring into hatred or contempt or execute or attempt to excite disaffection towards government established by law in India”. From this we can perceive that sedition will only be charged on a person, if his/ her words incite violence and disturbs public order.

CASE LAWS

  1. Shreya singhal v. union of India [1]: this is the landmark case in the history of sedition law where the word “speech” was defined. In this case, Supreme Court stated that through you spoken or written words can propagate whatever they want to but doesn’t incite people into violence. If any such act had led to affect the peace and tranquillity of public then the person who committed the offence will be charged with sedition.
  2. Kedar nath Singh v. state of Bihar [2]: in this case the constitutional validity of sedition law was questioned. Here, kedar nath Singh, former communist party leader of Bihar conducted a speech and he was convicted by first class magistrate on sedition charges. And the appeal before Supreme Court stated that the sedition law curbs the right to freedom of speech. In this case Supreme Court ruled that a person can say or write whatever he/she like about Government but with a condition of not inciting violence or not without disturbing public tranquillity.

CONCLUSION

Sedition law, a law which is over 150 years old are being successfully used by our successive Government. If we are taking a year in account, there are many cases reporting but only few of them reach the conviction stage. Many cases including Disha Ravi, Arundati Roy etc. was misused by police. Right to freedom of speech being a fundamental right will have an upper hand over sedition law. But if it ever curtails a person’s right to exercise their fundamental right, then the law should be scrapped.

ENDNOTES

  1. AIR 2015 SC 1523
  2. 1962 AIR 955
  3. https://indiankanoon.org/
  4. http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/delhi/2017/apr/28/police-question-jnu-students-in-kanhaiya-sedition-case-1598800.html
  5. CONSTIUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA BY DR. JN PANDEY

This article is written by Nourien Nizar student at Government law college, Ernakulum, Kerala.

INTRODUCTION

India Is a country with a population of over 130 crores people spanning through varied culture and heritage. It is home to many religions and gives due respects to a person’s choice to propagate the religion of his/her choice.

People hailing from all religions and cultures have different perspective, Ideas and feelings hence there are various Social Institutions that are guided by the views of different groups in the Society.

Marriage is one of the social institutions that is given abundant prominence, there are various laws governing marriages, some of them are codified such as the Hindu marriage act while the other such as the Muslim marriage law are not codified.

However a major dilemma that ought to be considered is the still prevalent perception of the people against people of different groups, caste and wealth, due to which a persons’ decision in a marital situation is often altered.

LAWS GOVERNING MARIAGE

While considering the Hindu marriage act[i], It only states that in order to solemnize a marriage under the act neither party must have a spouse at the time of marriage, both the parties must not be if unsound mind while giving a consent and  must be of the age of majority

A Muslim marriage however under the Muslim marriage laws[ii] is a contract unlike a sacrament in Hindu, and the essentials required for a valid marriage are similar and includes the need for a proposal made by or on behalf of one of the parties to the marriage, and an acceptance of the proposal by or on behalf of the other party provided that the consent thus provided is a free consent. It also requires the parties to be competent and does not require for any writing or formal ceremony.

There are other laws such as the Christian Marriage act and the Parsi marriage and Divorce act which governs the institution marriage in their respective religions

INTER CASTE OR INTERFAITH MARRIAGES

While all these laws highlight the need for a free choice on behalf of the parties it is often found to be contradicted when it comes to being practiced and is more prominent in the case of Inter Caste or Interfaith marriage, Although no religion states to be against Inter-caste marriages, there are endless cases regarding acts of violence and harassment against such couples.

KHAP PANCHAYATS

“Khap Panchayat”[iii] as it is known in north India and “Katta Panchayat” as it is known in Tamil Nadu, is a group of people of a community who acts as a quasi-judicial system to take decisions on acts that take place at a particular region which are deemed offensive and It is often found to impose harsh punishments based on old customary practices.

HONOR KILLING

Honor Killing in simple terms refers to the killing of a male or female for the reason, that their act in some way has brought shame either to their family or to the caste or towards their religion, such acts often include inter caste or interfaith marriages, illicit relationship with other men, loss of a women’s virginity before marriage, etc.

Although Honor killing does not have a separate section in any of the acts criminalizing it, however the acts of the IPC are sufficient enough to punish such offenders.

They can be booked under Section 300 of murder and will be punished accordingly

In the case of Bhagwan Dass vs State (NCT) Of Delhi[iv] where a man was convicted for murdering his own daughter for leaving her husband’s and staying with her Uncle stating that she had brought shame to the house, The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court convicting the girl’s father and stated that the act of Honor Killing is nothing but barbaric.

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO CHOOSE THEIR PARTNER

Article 21 in The Constitution Of India 1949 refers to the “Protection of life and personal liberty No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law”[v].

The same has been held by the court in the case of Shakti Vahini vs Union Of India and states that a person has the right to choose their partner[vi]

CASE LAWS REGARDING RIGHT TO CHOOSE PARTNER

In the case of Lata Singh vs. State of U.P[vii] where a girl filed a petition against her brothers for violence against her husband and his family on the grounds of Inter caste marriage, the Court held that when a boy/girl attains majority he/she has the right to make choices and thus have the right to choose to marry whomsoever he/she likes even though the family is not satisfied by it and the most that the family can do is to cut any connection with their son or daughter. The court also directed the police to protection to such couples.

Further in the case of Salamat Ansari and others. Vs. State of U.P. [viii]. the court while considering a petition to quash an FIR filed against a man alleging him of various offences under IPC including section 366 for Abduction, The court in this case considering the submissions of the girl that it was with her will that she went to stay with the petitioner and considering the age of the girl. The Court upheld her liberty of the decision and acquitted the boy of all charges.

In a recent Judgement by the Allahabad High Court, the court while deciding a case concerned with interfaith marriage, reiterated that It cannot be disputed that two adults have right of choice of their matrimonial partner irrespective of their religion and nobody and even their Parents cannot object their relationship.

CONCLUSION

India as a country has come a long way in terms of ensuring equal and fair rights to its people, and creating good laws to govern the people. This is one step closer to this allowing people to choose their partner denotes the liberty and freedom of expression in the society.


[i] Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 5.

[ii] Muslim Marriage laws;  https://www.indiafilings.com/learn/muslim-marriage-act/#:~:text=The%20Muslim%20Marriage%20Act%20was,marriage%20of%20their%20free%20wills.

[iii] “Supreme Court declares it illegal for khap panchayats to stall marriage between consenting adults”, Times of India, available at (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-declares-it-illegal-for-khap-panchayats-to-stall-marriage-between-consenting-adults/articleshow/63476839.cms).

[iv] Bhagwan Dass vs State (Nct) Of Delhi, (2011)  6 SCC 396.

[v] The Constitution of India, art. 21.

[vi] Shakti Vahini v Union of India, (2018) 7 SCC 192.

[vii] Lata Singh vs. State of U.P (2006) 5 SCC 475

[viii] Salamat Ansari and others. Vs. State of U.P  (2020) SCC OnLine All 1382.

This article is written by Govind S Nair, a 2nd year BBA LL. B student at VIT School of Law, Chennai. This article expresses the right of a person either boy/girl to choose their partner for marriage and the present situation regarding the same in the Country.

INTRODUCTION

The word “Nep” of nepotism is derived from ‘Nepote’, a 17th-century variant of the Italian word ‘nipote’ which means “nephew”. Nepotism is a term that began to be used in English for the exhibition of favouritism or biased preference to any blood relative or friends by someone in a position of power and can be described as an act where a person gets unfair advantages over the others for the mere reason of his kinship and amicable association with people who wield enough power and retain status to prevail over the hierarchical structure of any particular type of domain.

[1]India’s deep-seated history of unequality and a tapering welfare state have engraved this country’s name as one of the most unequal societies in the world, with the top 1% of the population holding four times more wealth as compared to the bottom 70%. As members of such a society, we have witnessed time and again, the prevalence of such partialities; the frustration and disappointment are feelings that never wanes, not even with time. Nepotism is not only considered a social evil but also a regressive and fatal approach towards the progress and transformation of India. Additionally, the trend is inclusive not only of Bollywood but is subsisting in every other sphere that accelerates the growth and expansion of the country. For instance, Employment, Politics, Judiciary, the Film industry, Organizations, Family Business or otherwise, etc.

Corruption goes hand in hand with nepotism. [2]Studies showcase and reflect the negative impacts of nepotism in biased decision-making, unfair treatment which incurs losses and affects the company’s performance in the long run. Diminishing the potential and self-confidence of the people and making them feel disheartened, demotivated, alienated due to the obvious stigma surrounding it are few of the outcomes of such disparity. Furthermore, it not only hinders competition but also stunts innovation and as such, weakens organizations and will potentially hamper the economic development of India as a whole.

NEPOTISM IN JUDICIARY

[3]Although the Indian Judiciary is the only organ of the state that selects its candidates in a hush manner and is not elected so it stands independently without being held accountable to the Republic for its judgments and is only responsible to itself. An Allahabad High Court Judge Rang Nath Pandey wrote a letter to the Prime Minister, averring “nepotism and casteism” in the appointment of judges to the High Court as well as the Supreme Court. He even raised concerns regarding judgments delivered by judges benefiting from Nepotism to be arbitrary in nature and further alleged that it was unfortunate that the basis for the appointment of judges was “kept under wraps”.

[4]Several High Courts and Supreme Court advocates and judges are alleged to have been appointed by the employment of casteism, nepotism, as well as favouritism. The allegation is based on the ground of the appointment process called the collegium which legally binds the President to heed the recommendation of the names of judges or advocates to be appointed or promoted to a tier higher or at the apex in the judicial hierarchy, putting a dent in the advocacy of accountability and independence of the Judiciary.

In the legal profession, nepotism also finds its way through Cronyism, where if an individual belongs to a certain chamber or is an ex-junior or intern, he/she has easy access to certain posts or cases by way of preference given through recommendations.

NEPOTISM AND POLITICS

[5] The statement that ‘politics in India is not a vocation but a family business’ is more than accurate with the caste system still at the centre of India’s thriving democracy. Difficulty arises when one tries to completely dissever the fabric of family, and status-based discrimination. Let’s suppose, Meena’s father is a member of the Lok Sabha, then she might regard the Parliament as her heirloom. During the election season, parties tend to hand out tickets to relatives, and family members as though it is a family inheritance. The concept of nepotism and favouritism is rampant in the country, no matter the party. The Congress Party, run by the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty for more than sixty decades is one example, Farooq Abdullah and his son Omar Abdullah is another example of this infested disease that has now found its roots in the working of internal politics in India.

The system of joint families in India worsened Nepotism. With a nuclear family at play, a power position will be recommended or favoured to the wife, children, and straggling extended members of the family; uncle, aunty, nephews, sons-in-law, etc and will never be segregated fairly to deserving candidates just because blood is considered to be thicker than water. Also, for many, politics is simply a tool of self-enrichment as well as a gateway to corruption instead of utilizing their status of power and wealth for the betterment of the country. Money made out of corruption entices greedy individuals with an immoral, unscrupulous and deceitful disposition.

IMPACTS OF NEPOTISM

1. [6]When the internal spectrum of politics of a democratic country is filled with hereditary succession, one of the biggest affects it can have is the potential loss of faith in democracy. Dynastic governance not only demeans the democratic principles but also questions the legitimacy of democracy which can consequently result in extremist anti-government or state rebellions and movements like Maoist and Naxalite.

2. While Corruption is the outcome, nepotism is the instigator. The parasitical relationship between nepotism and corruption can be witnessed in the corruption perception index where almost all third world countries with hereditary governance perform with mediocrity.

3. The governance system of a country is affected as the paucity of distinguished administrators and policy makers at every stage and sector of hierarchy makes good governance impossible as top-notch human resources is a prerequisite of good governance.

4. The quality and quantity of leaders leading a developing country in various spheres such as socio-economic, political, entrepreneurial, religious,  global etc. deteriorate due to the fact that candidates and members of such bodies are being selected/recommended through favouritism, nepotism and bribery, the consequence of which is a hindrance to the overall progression of the country.

The other negative effects of nepotism also include the negation of talents, merits, abilities, efficiency and the consequent diminishing of self-confidence, integrity, and moralistic values. The abrogation of rules, neglecting the prevalent laws and sweeping of morality under the rug greatly affects the general credibility of public servants, breeds cynicism among the masses and leads to a perilous crisis to the well-being of society and reduces the chances of sustainability of democracy in the long term.

MEASURES TAKEN TO MODERATE NEPOTISM

[7]As an act towards curbing nepotism, favouritism and corruption, the Central government by order of the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), headed by the Prime Minister, clarified the meaning of “members of family” under the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964. As per the rule of CCS (Conduct) Rules 4(1), the position of power or influence shall not be utilized by any Government servant, directly or otherwise, to secure employment for any of his family members in companies or firms. In addition, according to rule 4(3), “members of family” includes any person in relation to a government servant—spouse, children, parents, siblings, or any person related to them by blood or marriage whether dependent or not.

In pursuant of the recommendations by the collegiums of the Kerala and Allahabad High Courts, the Supreme Court in [8]consultation with the SC collegium and taking into account issues with regards to the secretariat, transparency, and complaint mechanism, directed the Centre to finalise the existing MoP and emphasized three key issues. Firstly, that the HC collegium should forward a ‘wider pool’ of names for the purpose of inclusivity and broader choice. Secondly, it emphasized the requirement for a stringent method to scrutinize the names forwarded by the HC collegium: transparent, objective and rational method is the goal. Thirdly, sources stated that the government has also deliberated the notion of setting up a permanent secretariat of the collegium for the purpose of continuity concerning the appointment of judges, even after changes in the composition of a collegium pursuing the retirement of sitting judges.

CONCLUSION

Though the concept of nepotism is unfair, redundant and unfortunately remains to be prevalent in every part of the world in variant subtleties, there are several facets to be scrutinized when it comes to examining the unfair advantages acquired through nepotism. For example, out of the five candidates who were hired to work in a well-known firm, one was related by blood to the director of the said firm. Despite fair trial and interview, without an ounce of evident favouritism, he secured the seat entirely with his sheer determination and hard work but is eventually asked to vacate or is disqualified for the sole reason of being related to a person in power. This does not only showcase the lack of proper regulation but also the failure to take into account the talent, merit and ability of the candidate and hence discriminatory. Sometimes, all that is needed to help identify the nuances of nepotism is a different pair of lens.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

[1] The Hindu.https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/the-politics-of-nepotism/article32072772.ece

[2]Theconversation.https://theconversation.com/nepotism-is-bad-for-the-economy-but-most-people-underestimate-it-103909

[3]Zeenews.India.https://zeenews.india.com/india/allahabad-hc-judge-writes-to-pm-alleges-nepotism-casteism-in-appointment-of-judges-2216289.html

[4] Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nepotism

[5] The Sydney Morning Herald.https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/nepotism-the-way-they-do-politics-in-india-20140327-zqnpg.html

[6]IASexpress.https://www.iasexpress.net/nepotism-origin-types-ethical-issues-impacts-way-forward/

[7]Livemint.https://www.livemint.com/Politics/1o4uHD1GCKzmqaaM0hZFEP/Govt-clarifies-rules-to-check-nepotism-by-civil-servants.html

[8]Indianexpress.https://indianexpress.com/article/india/citing-cases-of-nepotism-government-pushes-its-mop-proposals-5287453/

This article is written by Melody Khuoltaikim Singson, a first-year law student from Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. This article intends to highlight the meaning and negative impacts of nepotism in the functioning of a democratic country like India.

Abstract


The pay gap is an issue for our country because it prohibits the country to become a superpower
in economic areas. This article prescribes the “Equal pay for equal work” and Constitutional and
Labor legislation concepts in Acts like the Equal Remuneration Act, Contract Labor, and
Factories Act, etc. The Directive Principle of State Policy defined under Part IV of the
Constitution has provision for equal pay for equal work. It also states where can be discriminated
against or not in payment. 

Introduction


Equal pay for equal work means an equal payment to someone who has been employed in the
same place and does the same work. Even the temporary worker who has done the same work in
the same shift should get equal payment in comparison to the permanent worker.
Constitutional provisions


Article 14 – Equality before the law means every person is equal in the eyes of Law there should
not be discrimination. Everyone has equal rights and opportunities . 
Article 15(1) – Prohibition of discrimination against citizens of India on grounds of caste or sex
which means no one can be distinguished and unfavorable to the person. This means the
employer will get equal payment from an employer either from a different caste or a woman .
Article 15(3) – It is the exception of Article 15 clauses 1 and 2. The state can make laws for
women and children to improve the situations of women and children . 
Article 16 – Equal opportunity in public employment .
Article 39 – It is defined that the State should direct the policies for equal remuneration to both
men and women. This means if both the parties are doing equal work then they should be paid
equally without any discrimination. If the people are in the same post or either different place
then he should get equal payment.
Article 42 – The state should ensure and make provision for the workplace should be a humane
condition for women and make provision for maternity relief . 
Article 51(A) (e) – To abolish the practices against women’s dignity .


The term equal also includes allowances benefits and promotions. The directive principles are
not enforceable by law. The state must make legislation for the prohibition of discrimination in
payment. Also, it is a fundamental right under Articles 14, 15 and 16. Various judgments have
been decided through fundamental rights.  Equal pay for equal work was first acknowledged in
the case Kishori Mohanlal Bakshi v. Union of India , in which the Supreme Court held that the
court cannot enforce the court of law. In 1987, in the case, Mackinnon Mackenzie & Company

Limited v. Audrey D coastal & others , the woman who was a stenographer was discriminated
against based on sex she paid less than men. The court held that it is discrimination against
women. When both men and women are doing the same work in the same circumstances they
should be paid equally.
Randhir Singh v. Union of India , in this case, the court held that the equality for equal work is
mentioned in directive principles and directive states and not under the fundamental right but is
considered a Constitutional goal. The court can enforce constitutional remedies prescribed under
Article 32.
State of Punjab and Ors v. Jagjit Singh and Ors , in this case, the court held that the workers
who are doing temporary work, ad hoc and daily wages should get equal payment which is given
to the permanent worker. To refuse the equal payment is oppressive, coercive and exploitative
behavior with them.


Statute related to equal pay for equal work


Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923

  • Those workers accidentally injured during work should be compensated by companies.
  • Because of differences in negotiating power, women may be exploited.


Minimum Wages Act, 1948

  • The state has fixed minimum wages in the territory. This means an employer cannot give less than the fixed wages.
  • Workers are poorly organized & have less negotiating power in India. Because in India there is also the problem of employment so the workers are accepting the money without negotiation.


Factories Act, 1948

  • The object of this Act is to improve the conditions of laborers in factories and industries.

Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970


The object was to make this Act that there should be a separate provision for utilities and fix
working hours for the women.


Equal Remuneration Act, 1976


In 1975, this was passed as equal remuneration Ordinance, 1975 and further converted into an
Act, the Equal remuneration Act, 1976. Women were not getting equal payments and working
conditions according to them. The Act made for improvement of the women condition in
remuneration. The provision of the Act is against discrimination in the recruitment and
promotion of men and women. When this Act was enacted, they considered the physical & social
burden a woman faces or the condition of the women during their pregnancy time.


In the case, Dharwad District P.W.D. Literate Daily Wage Employees Association and
others v. State of Karnataka and others
. the court in this case held that Sec. 5 of the equal remuneration Act states that there shall be no discrimination against women in their appointment,
recruitment, and promotion. It means if both men and women are working in the same condition
then women should not be discriminated on these. The employer should maintain a register or
documents to avoid unjust practices. 


Code on Wages Act, 2019 


This Act considered equal pay for equal work for all genders. Under Sec.16 of this Act has given
the power to the employer that they can fix wages based on monthly, daily, or weekly but not
more than a month.


Exceptions of equal pay for equal work


This is mentioned in our Constitution in Directive Principles and Directive States. However, it is
not an absolute right. Exceptions are not mentioned but they came from the cases.

In the case F.A.I.C and C.E.S v. Union of India 13 , the court held that employers can fix
different pay scales for employees who have a similar post and work but there is a difference
between responsibility, reliability, and confidentiality.  Equal payment depends on the work that
has been done and not the volume of work.


International Perspective 


The problem related to equal remuneration is not only limited to India but is worldwide. This has
been discussed at various conventions. The Equal Remuneration Convention, 1952 states that
there should not be discrimination against equal remuneration.
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has stated that it doesn’t matter if the labor is male
or female if they are doing equal work with equal capacity, there is no requirement of the gender
pay gap. 


Gender pay gap


This means the difference between the earnings of men and women who are involved in the same
work. India ranks the last 10 in female participation. Female participation is a very low rate in
rural areas compared to urban areas. Women are not educated. This is also the reason. 


Conclusion 


In India, we have many statutes which talk about how everyone should get equal pay for equal
work. But the inequality in recruitment still exists. Court has decided in many cases that it is the
right of the employees to get equal payment. Government should organize a campaign for
awareness towards equal recruitment to labour. 


Every individual should be equally paid there should not be discrimination but employers can
discriminate based on responsibility and volume of work done by employees.

This article is written by Prachi Yadav, a 2 nd Year student from Mody University of Science and
Technology, Laxmangarh, Rajasthan.