Introduction

The significance and relic of schooling in Kerala are highlighted by the state’s positioning as among the most educated in the country. The instructive change of Kerala was set off by the endeavors of the Congregation Mission Society ministers, who advanced mass training in Kerala, in the early many years of the nineteenth hundred years. The nearby dynastic antecedents of current Kerala — basically the Travancore Regal Family, the Nair Administration Society, Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam (SNDP Yogam) and Muslim Instructive Society (MES) — additionally gained a critical commitment to the headway on training in Kerala. Nearby schools were known by the general word kalaris, some of which showed combative techniques, yet other town schools run by Ezhuthachans were for bestowing general training. Christian preachers and English rule carried the advanced school schooling system to Kerala.

Present

Schools and universities are generally shown to the public authority, confidential trusts, or people. Each school is associated with either the State Gathering of Instructive Exploration or Preparing, Kerala (SCERT Kerala), the Focal Board for Auxiliary Training (CBSE), Indian Endorsement of Optional Instruction (ICSE), or the (NIOS). English is the language of guidance in most non-public schools, while government-run schools offer English or Malayalam as the vehicle of guidance. Government-run schools in the regions lining Karnataka and Tamil Nadu likewise offer guidance in Kannada or Tamil dialects. A small bunch of Government Sanskrit Schools give guidance in Sanskrit enhanced by Malayalam, English, Tamil or Kannada. Following 10 years of optional tutoring, understudies regularly select at Higher Auxiliary School in one of the three streams — aesthetic sciences, trade or science. After finishing the necessary coursework, understudies can sign up for general or expert degree programs. Kerala bested the Training Advancement Record (EDI) among 21 significant states in India in the year 2006-2007. In January 2016, Kerala turned into the first Indian state to accomplish 100 percent essential schooling through its proficiency program Athulyam. Around 18% of the complete representatives in the coordinated area of the state, both public and private, are utilized in the Instructive area as of Spring 2020. Kerala is likewise one of the Indian states which spends a bigger extent of its income on human asset improvement including instructive and medical care uplifting. Also, it is for the most part literate.

Issues looked in our legitimate schooling system in Kerala are:

1. Nonattendance of the prepared workforce to show interdisciplinary subjects of pertinence in the globalized setting: LL.M. qualified hands alone are deficient in conferring exhaustive information to understudies in the space of corporate regulations, innovation-based regulations, ecological regulation and so forth. The administrations of prepared faculty in different disciplines are required for giving powerful schooling to regulation understudies here. This inadequacy is most apparent in the absence of qualified staff to show specialized parts of arising innovation-based regulations like digital regulation.

2. Practically all-out shortfall of the road regulation experience: a definitive point of regulation in a socialized society is to guarantee that equity arrives at all. Since this implies that equity ought to win even on the roads among the discouraged of society-thus the wording ‘road regulation’. The shortfall of socially significant lawful schooling brings about concealment and disregarding the call of equity to act in different social circumstances. Legal counselors move on from graduate school with a thought process of bringing in cash from the calling, and disparaging common liberties regulation practice, as cash can’t be made by supporting poor people and minimized.

3. Absence of information on legitimate cycle among our new regulation alumni: Most understudies emerge from our conventional regulation universities in Kerala none excessively savvier regarding how to the genuine course of regulation. Years are spent simply getting book information on considerable and procedural regulation. One month or so committed to court practice, however, integrated into the course structure to give a vibe of a regular case to the understudy, is really a futile activity as the normal understudy scarcely comprehends what is truly happening in court.

4. Low quality of support among the larger part of legal counselors in the express: The craft of promotion isn’t shown exhaustively by our regulation educators, and is hurriedly referenced in a solitary course joining Lawful Drafting, Conveyance, Proficient Morals and Backing. Specialization in the specialty of drafting, conveyance, questioning, powerful talking and so forth are accessible just to a special minority who are sufficiently lucky to rehearse under an accomplished senior supporter.

5. Mediocre nature of showing society in our Express: The lazy culture common among regulation educators in showing their understudies is a peculiarity predominant in the law schools of our state. Most educators give the reason that understudies are not keen on learning, subsequently their “what’s the point” mentality. Frequently, be that as it may, just a minority of understudies are delinquent, while a larger part comes to school with the aim to concentrate on themselves.

Legal Aid

Article 14 of the Constitution of India discusses uniformity under the steady gaze of regulation and Article 39A accommodates equivalent equity and free legitimate guide.

“Article 39A of the Constitution of India accommodates comprehensive methodology in giving equity to the prosecuting parties. It not just incorporates giving free legitimate guide by means of an arrangement of advice for the defendants, yet additionally incorporates guaranteeing that equity isn’t denied to disputing parties because of monetary challenges.”

The State, which has been commanded by Article 39A of the Constitution to guarantee that the activity of the overall set of laws advances equity by giving free legitimate guide and that potential open doors for getting equity are not denied to any resident by reason of monetary or different incapacities, has not had the option to make a compelling component for making equity available to poor people, discouraged and burdened. In last more than twenty years, the foundation of the lawful administration specialists has delivered yeoman’s administration in the field of giving a legitimate guidance to the poor yet a ton is expected to be finished for guaranteeing equity to the financially denied segment of the general public and the people who experience the ill effects of different handicaps like lack of education and obliviousness.

Rebuilding Legitimate Guide Facilities

The Clinical Legitimate Schooling development is picking up speed in India however much it is universally. As legally necessary, numerous graduate schools have set up lawful guide centers. A portion of these facilities is utilitarian, while others are either on paper or non-useful. There is a particular need to redesign and change these facilities to meet one of the public or global principles. Local area mindfulness is the essential capability of these centers. There is interest for individuals to know the regulations, their privileges, commitments and legislative approaches. Legitimate guide centers make public mindfulness through lawful training projects like studios, public addresses, social events, banner exhibits, and so forth. Without a doubt, these occasions are sine qua non to all lawful guide centers and should be done broadly; yet an alternate standpoint from them can guarantee worthier advantages.

The Center expects to give free legitimate guidance to defenseless people and individuals from the more fragile segments of society and to bring out the social government assistance exercises by sharpening individuals about their lawful privileges and obligations. It leads a few Lawful Proficiency Camps to achieve legitimate mindfulness by connecting really with the underestimated segments of the general public. It expects to give useful information on regulation to understudies by giving them chances to know the ground’s real factors. Various panels of the understudies have been framed to investigate various regions where a lawful guide is required.

Objectives of legal aid clinic

  • Advance lawful schooling and examination.
  • Paralegal administrations by the workforce and the understudies.
  • Community for viable expert preparation for understudies of regulation.
  • Lawful administrations to the socially and the financially in reverse areas of the general public who experience issues getting to the legal framework.
  • Spread mindfulness to the general public about contemporary lawful issues and advancements.
  • Give understudies vital drafting and investigating abilities.

Conclusion

The legitimate calling is supposed to assume a powerful part in the organization of equity. Graduate schools being the selecting justification for the legitimate calling, there is a need to infuse new soul into the substance of lawful training to make attorneys and legitimate experts socially significant and expertly capable to tie down the established command of admittance to equity.

References

  1. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294871717_4_Legal_Education_in_Kerala-Problems_and_Perspectives2009_1_Kerala_Law_Times_43.
  2. [Online] https://www.las.nluo.ac.in/post/legal-aid-clinics-in-law-schools.

This article is written by Cheshta Bhardwaj, from Delhi Metropolitan Education (GGSIPU).

Introduction

Money is a major factor in people’s lives in the modern world. With the transition from cash to banknotes to credit-rated playing cards, there is a clear rise in financial fraud. It has become necessary for third parties to help with transaction processing, buyer-seller mediation, storage of products and cash, money transportation, and even revenue accumulation to deal with these intricate currency structures. Banks have a right to fulfil this intermediate role, and bankers are mediators. As the variety of these intermediaries grew over time, more government regulation was required to monitor, regulate, and change their operations.

To date, there is no proper definition of attempted financial institution fraud by anyone. For gifts, the section under the IPC protects against fraud, concealment, forgery, embezzlement, breach of belief, criminal conspiracy, etc. It is used in all bank fraud cases. There is no proper section that deals with financial institution fraud and finds standards for committing and punishing such fraud. While these financial frauds cause substantial damage and loss to financial institutions and banks, they are not called scammers in India. Things are exploding right now and the types of these scams are increasing tremendously with our growing knowledge of the times. In 2001, after massive fraud such as Harshad Mehta fraud, vanishing agency rip-off, plantation company fraud, NGO fraud, mutual budget fraud, and Ketan Parekh rip-off.

As the economy slows, frauds increase

Financial institutions have seen a startling seven-fold surge in fraud instances in only five years.

90% of total fraud sums and 55% of total fraud coverage are attributable to Public Sector Bank (PSB) fraud. This year, there was more PSB fraud. A recent Rajya Sabha probe, according to the finance minister, revealed a very high amount of PSB fraud.

The State Bank of India registered the biggest loss due to the order in which bank losses occurred. Following it are the Baroda Bank with Rs 8,273 crore and the Punjab National Bank with Rs 10,822 crore. According to documents published in 2017 by the National Criminal Records Bureau (NCRB), the number of charges for financial offenses (as defined by the Indian Penal Code, or IPC) has increased to 111. Here, an economic crime includes offenses like ATM-related fraud, counterfeiting, and banknote forgery. White-collar crime has been dubbed the epicentre of Jaipur, and Chennai has been claimed by several leases.

Reporting also leads to an expansion of the fraud’s scope. Cases were thoroughly documented, and her RBI put up a Central Fraud Registry to aid with case monitoring. Additionally, the RBI commanded that any defective goods with costs exceeding Rs. 500 crores be checked for potential fraud. These offenses don’t just affect big banks; they also affect little institutions.

In general, slowing down might make these scams worse. According to one theory, it might be attractive to further reduce fraud as a corporation expands and fights to get out of a more debt-ridden scenario. PNB recently reported a bank quarter scam involving DHFL accounts for Rs. 3,688.58 billion. These frauds come in an increasing variety. The RBI detected fraud in financial institutions in 2019 of Rs 71,500, although state-owned banks were responsible for 90% of these losses.

There are no codified laws prohibiting such fraud in overseas prisons, therefore instead of filing cases with police/CBI courts, there is no legal structure in place for such situations. In FY’22, banking frauds totaling more than 100 crores significantly decreased. In private and public regional banks, there were 118 fraud cases in FY22 compared to 265 in 2020–21. Banks reported fraud cases totaling 41,000 crores in 2021–22, down from 1.05 lakh crore the year before. This shows a dramatic decrease in frauds involving amounts exceeding 100 crores in the banking sector. Professional figures show that the number of fraud cases in private and public regional banks decreased from 265 in 2020–21 to 118 in FY22.

According to statistics, the overall number of fraud cases involving above $100 crores for public region banks (PSBs) reduced to 80 from 167 in FY’21, while for private region creditors, such cases decreased to 38 in FY’22 from 98 in FY’21. For PSBs, the overall amount has decreased from 65,900 crores in FY 21 to 28,000 crores. The discount for non-public regional banks is from 39,900 crores to 13,000 crores in FY’22.

The RBI has been taking numerous actions to detect frauds, including enhancing the effectiveness of the Early Warning System (EWS) framework, strengthening the governance and response system for fraud, enhancing statistics evaluation for tracking transactions, and establishing a dedicated Market Intelligence (MI) Unit for frauds. Public sector banks (PSBs) saw a decrease in fraud cases from 167 in FY2021 to 80 in FY2021, while private sector lenders saw a decrease from 98 cases in FY2021 to 38 instances in FY2022.

From £65.9 trillion in FY21 to £28 trillion in PSB, it has decreased cumulatively. The cut for private banks for FY2022 is between Rs. 39,900 and Rs. 13,000.

RBI Steps to check fraud cases

To check for fraud, the RBI will improve the effectiveness of its Early Warning System (EWS), strengthen its fraud governance and response system, expand data analytics to monitor transactions, and develop a dedicated Market Intelligence (MI)

Use of Artificial Intelligence

The rapid development of technology has opened up a new criminal arena. Cybercrime is currently a hot topic in India. Not surprisingly, India ranked third in the world for the number of reported cybercrimes in 2020, and the majority of these cases (up to 45% of cybercrimes) were online financial fraud. There are many online scams these days, including:

Phishing – Scammers propagate links via messages, attachments, advertisements, and other media to redirect their clicks to fake pages identical to their original website such as banks, e-commerce platforms, social media, etc.

Vishing/Telegraphic Fraud – Scammers posing as representatives of banks, corporations, insurance agencies, governments, etc. Contacting people via phone or other media to obtain information such as passwords, OTPs, and PINs. Get unauthorized access to your account by tricking or persuading.

Malicious Apps – Scammers encourage you to download unknown apps via installed messages, ads, giveaways, etc., thereby gaining access to the target device and stealing OTPs and already stored information such as credentials.

ATM skimming – ATMs are installed with a device that can copy data from the target ATM card and a PIN that can be used to withdraw money.

SIM card cloning – Scammers can clone their SIM (Subscriber Identity Module) card of a registered mobile number linked to a bank account to steal and scam a target’s identity.

QR Code Scam – Scammers can trick a target into scanning her malicious QR (quick response) code, which allows them to surreptitiously access the target’s device and retrieve information.

Surprisingly, following the introduction of Covid-19, the number of instances of financial fraud committed online has risen. These con artists use deception to get victims to test their medication as one method of catching tartar. Financial institutions are investing more than $217 billion in AI and machine learning (ML) solutions to address this issue. According to estimates, the deployment of such technologies cut down on investigation time by 70% and increased fraud detection accuracy by 90%.

Here are some ways AI and ML can be integrated into banking systems to keep consumers safe:

Numerous IT firms, including Teradata and Datavisor, are developing customized AI fraud detection tools for banks. AI software analyses consumer transaction patterns, create profiles using such information and may spot anomalous behavior. Uncanny Vision offers artificial intelligence (AI) monitoring at businesses and ATMs to track human behavior and notify you in case of questionable conduct. To confirm identity, biometric security scans a person’s distinctive biometric print, such as a finger, thumb, or retina. Using multi-factor authentication, Know Your Customer (KYC) integrates all data, including biometrics, to thwart illegal access. Security software alerts users to illicit app downloads that haven’t been verified by the user and could harm the device. Every minute, email platforms like Gmail find millions of spam messages that, if not deleted, might target users. Software that recognizes spam and fraud calls, like the True Caller app, alerts you in advance. Similar apps are also used by some insurance firms to identify probable fraudulent claims.

In addition to being secure and quick, using AI to fight fraud also improves user experience, offers individualized solutions, and lowers expenses and the possibility of human error. AI is a self-learning program that instantly updates and modifies itself to offer the most practical and successful answers.

The Bottom Line

While the progressive liberalization process has given the Indian banking industry a fresh coat of paint, it has also presented some significant obstacles. Fraud and a spike in her NPA are two of them. The banks involved have not suffered losses as a result of the fraudulent activity afflicting the financial sector, but their credibility has been further damaged.

Cases of bank fraud have increased recently in India. In India, bank fraud is frequently regarded as one of the costs of conducting business, but since liberalization, its prevalence, complexity, and associated expenses have all skyrocketed. Regulatory issues are affecting bank profitability and, consequently, the Indian economy.

References

  1. Akansha Barua, Emerging Economic Frauds in Banking Sector, LawBhoomi(22 July 2022) Available at: https://lawbhoomi.com/emerging-economic-frauds-in-banking-sector/
  2. The Editor, Banking frauds of over ₹100 crore see significant decline in FY’22, The Hindu(4 July, 2022) Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/banking-frauds-of-over-100-crore-see-significant-decline-in-fy22/article65595269.ece
  3. Pushpita Dey, ‘Banking Frauds Using Communication Devices Rose By More Than 65% Post Covid’ (Outlook India, 18 December 2021) https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/business-news-bankingfrauds-using-communication-devices-rose-by-more-than-65-post-covid/405699 (22 Septl 2022)
  4. Internet Crime Complaint Center, Internet Crime Report 2020 (2021) 17 https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2020_IC3Report.pdf
  5. PYMNTS, ‘How AI And Machine Learning Can Address Banks’ Fraud-Fighting Weaknesses’ PYMNTS, 09 July 2021) https://www.pymnts.com/fraud-prevention/2021/ai-ml-banks-fraud-fighting/  (22 September 2022)
  6. Shruti Sinha,BANKING FRAUDS: REFORMS BY GOVERNMENT AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,VOL. 1 ISSUE 3,Journal of Legal Research and Juridical Sciences,ISSN (O): 2583-0066 Available at: https://jlrjs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/8.-Shruti-Sinha-1.pdf

This article has been written by Jay Kumar Gupta. He is currently a second-year BBA LL.B.(Hons.) student at the School of Law, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Bangalore.

-Report by Harshita

It was held by the hon’ble Supreme Court recently in the case of Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika vs Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika Kamgar Union that the provision of employment to the heirs of employees on compassionate grounds was unsustainable and thus prohibited.

FACTS

Ahmednagar Municipal Council was converted to Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika in 2003, and an important demand on the part of employees was the assurance that their heirs would be employed by the Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika. As a major demand of its employees, it was agreed upon by the Municipal Council. Hence, the Industrial Court administered that the employees in Class-IV category(if they die before their retirement, if they become invalid, or if they retire), their heirs should be given employment in their stead. When some further demands were raised and the decision was supposed to be modified, the Industrial Court changed the condition. This led to the Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika being instructed to (1) provide employment to heirs of ‘CLASS-IV’ employees working in healthcare only, (2) provide employment to heirs of all the classes on compassionate grounds as per government regulations and directions. This meant that the heirs of employees won’t be rewarded with employment on compassionate grounds on retirement and only provided to heirs of deceased employees of the Class-IV category.

Later on, Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika Kamgar Union went on to demand the employment of heirs of the retired employees according to the previous judgment. Under the guidance of the High court, the Industrial court changed the course of action and provided the legal heirs of the employees with work on grounds of retirement and superannuation.

Dissatisfied with the decision, Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika presented the current appeals.

APPELLANT’S SIDE

The Learned Counsel contended that both the Industrial Court and the High Court have based their judgment on the decision from the original situation when Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika was a Municipal Council, which was regarded as an error by the petitioner side. The judgment for the case of The Secretary to Govt. Department of Education (Primary) & Others v. Bheemesh alias Bheemappa was considered relevant in this situation.

Another argument was that such employment given to the heirs of retired employees is opposing Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. Further, the provision of such employment should be based on other factors which are the financial situation of the employees’ family, the role of the deceased and such. Again, the remuneration of the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs instead of employment for heirs who have crossed the age of 45 should itself be unfeasible.

RESPONDENT’S SIDE

With the case of Subhadra v. Ministry of Coal and another as reliance, the respondent’s side supported their situation that neither the Industrial Court nor the High Court made any mistake in presenting the judgment. Introducing the concept of ‘varas hakka’, they said the employment is not based on compassionate grounds but because of varas hakka.

COURT’S DECISION

Regarding the present situation of the country as opposed to when the first judgment came out in 1979, it is unreasonable to provide employment to heirs of employees on compassionate grounds as observed by both the Industrial Court and the High Court. After the conversion of the institution, it is now under the jurisdiction of the State government and there is no provision for any such heirs’ rights. Compassionate employment is already considered as an exception and cannot be provided as it opposes Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. Even if it is known as ‘varas hakka’, it is not provided by any act or employment scheme. It was observed

“the employees of the Mahanagar Palika/Municipal Corporation shall be governed by the scheme of the State Government at par with the government employees, which does not provide for appointment on compassionate grounds to the heirs of the employees on their retirement and/or superannuation. Even otherwise, such an appointment to the heirs of the employees on their retirement and/or superannuation shall be contrary to the object and purpose of appointment on compassionate grounds and is hit by Article 14 of the Constitution of India.”

The court also observed that if the compassionate employment is not scrutinized properly, it may be unfair to the outsiders who are more qualified, as only the heirs will be reappointed. Therefore the appeal was allowed.

-Report by Sarweshree Bawari

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Jagir Singh Vs the State of Punjab, held that the FIR be dismissed even though the offence was heinous. The matter was classified as being private as it involved a husband-wife, and both of them reached an agreement outside the court.

FACTS

In this case, a FIR is sought to be quashed. The FIR came to be lodged at the behest of respondent Sarvjeet Kaur, the wife of plaintiff Jagir Singh. She alleged that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner on 26 February 2020 and since then she has been residing with him as his wife. Jagir Singh is in the Indian Army, but he does not provide any financial support to his wife to run her household nor does he behave properly. The petitioner insisted on developing physical relations to which the respondent agreed but since he tried to commit unnatural intercourse to which she refused. She has been a victim of harassment by her husband ever since for bringing in less dowry. Therefore, the matter was investigated by the police, and they presented challan in the competent court of law but it could not be taken to its logical end. This was because the husband-wife duo reached for a settlement outside the court. They decided to settle the dispute among themselves amicably.

The court directed the respondent state to verify the facts about the compromise, if any, arrived at by the parties, so that the facts with regard to the compromise can be ascertained.

Although the reply on behalf of the respondent-state is said to have been filed, the same is not recorded, nor are the instructions of the respondent on record, but Sarabjit Kaur is present in the court and represented by Miss Mamta.

RESPONDENT’S CONTENTION

The Learned Counsel contended that the defendant has, of her violation, compromised the matter with the petitioner and now they have amicably resolved to settle the dispute. She states that both of them have filed proceedings in the competent court of law for dissolution of marriage by way of mutual consent and she has also received a sum of Rs.4,00,00 out of the eight lakh promised to her. As such she does not wish to prosecute the case any further and would like to quash all the charges.

The court’s dilemma

The court was in a sudden dilemma as to whether they should allow both parties to quash the charges or carry on with the criminal proceedings. The Hon’ble Apex court in Narendra Singh and others vs the State of Punjab and another had specifically held that the power under section 482 CrPC is not to be exercised in cases that involve heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity. Such offences are not private and have a serious impact on society. It would be open to the High Court to examine the case. Further, in Gian Singh Vs the State of Punjab, it was mentioned that the court must have due regard to the nature in the gravity of the crime and its social impact and it cautioned the courts not to exercise the power of quashing proceedings in heinous and serious offences of mental depravity, murder, rape, dacoity etc. In this particular case, the kind of harassment, the mental damage and the professional report of Sarvjeet Kaur are said to play a key role.

COURT’S DECISION

It was observed by the court

“In the case at hand, the offences alleged to have been committed by the accused though are heinous offences but since the parties are husband-wife and have decided to part their ways by filing divorce petition with mutual consent and compromise has been arrived at inter se them, as such, no fruitful purpose would be served in continuing with criminal prosecution of the petitioner, more so when complainant has compromised the matter with the accused and complainant is no more interested in pursuing the case further and there are bleak and remote chances of conviction of accused and as such, this court sees no impediment in accepting the prayer made by petitioners for quashing of FIR.”

The court, therefore, quashed all the charges against the petitioner.

School of Law, Raffles University is organising the 5th Surana & Surana and School of Law, Raffles University National Labor Law Moot Court Cum Judgement Writing Competition 2022-23.

ABOUT

School of Law, Raffles University with its organizing partner Surana and Surana, International Attorneys, Chennai is proud to announce the 5th Surana & Surana and School of Law, Raffles University National Labor Law Moot Court Cum Judgement Writing Competition 2022-23.

It is an initiative was taken forward by the organizers to create awareness in the field primarily of Labour Law and the surrounding disciplines of Employment law, Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Service Law, etc.

ELIGIBILITY

  • The Competition is open to students who are studying LLB three-year or five-year courses during the current academic year interested in Employment Law and who belong to institutions that have been invited.
  • Each team should consist of a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 3 members. This number cannot be modified under any circumstances.
  • There shall be 2 speakers and 1 researcher designated for each team. The researcher shall be allowed to argue with prior permission of the court and National Administrator in case of illness of the designated speakers.
  • Each team will be provided a team code during orientation. Teams should not disclose the identity of their institution; such disclosure shall invite penalties including disqualification. the decision for the same shall be at the discretion of the National Administrator.

DETAILS

  • Online registrations are open from September 14, 2022. The teams must register online by October 15, 2022. Teams will have to register online at the link given at the end of this post.
  • Only 40 teams will be registered to participate in the competition on a first-come-first-serve basis.
  • No temporary registration requests will be entertained. Kindly refrain from sending such requests to Surana & Surana Or Sol, Raffles University.
  • Participants will receive an automated system-generated acknowledgment on the successful submission of registration. Participants will receive approval as acceptance of their request for participation latest by October 16, 2022, or earlier.
  • On receiving the provisional team code from the moot committee/society of SOL, Raffles University you may proceed to pay the registration fees. A registration fee of Rs. 2000 /- is to be paid online by October 16, 2022.
  • Option 1: The Registration form cum Approval letter as provided in the rules duly signed & sealed by your university/college /moot society.
  • Option 2: Upload both (i) & (ii) together as a single PDF
  • The Registration form cum Approval letter (without seal & signature) as provided in the rules duly filled
  • Scanned copy of authorization letter with sign and seal from your university/college/moot society or an email communication from the official id (to be filled as notification email id during the online registration process) of the institution, from your university/college / moot society to complete the registration process.
  • Please read the brochure for more information.

AWARDS

  • Winner: Rs. 21, 000/-
  • Runner up: Rs.11, 000/-
  • Best Memorial: Rs. 5, 100/-
  • Best Student Advocate: Rs.5, 100/-

IMPORTANT DATES

  • Last date for Online Registration: October 15, 2022
  • Last date for payment of Registration Fee: October 16, 2022
  • Last date for receiving copies of Reg. form/approval letter along with details of registration fee payment: October 17, 2022
  • Last date for requesting clarification for problem: October 20, 2022
  • Last Date for Submission of Memorials One Hard Copy (both applicant and respondent) & Soft Copy by email: November 10, 2022
  • Orientation: November 18, 2022
  • Prelims- 1/ Prelims – 2/Octa final/Quarter final: November 19, 2022
  • Semi Final/ Final, Valediction & Prize distribution: November 20, 2022
  • Submission of Judgment (soft copies by way email / Pen drive): November 20, 2022
  • Submission of Judgment (soft copies by way email/ pen drive) for semi-finalist and finalist: November 22, 2022
  • Declaration of Judgment Writing Competition result: December 15, 2022

LINKS

BROCHURE

PROPOSITION

FORM

RULES

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Vishwakarma University is organizing a National e-Seminar on the Usage of Blockchain Technology on September 30, 2022.

ABOUT

Vishwakarma University, Pune, is a natural offshoot of the Vishwakarma Group of Institutions’ educational legacy spanning more than 35 years. The University has been established as a State Private University through Maharashtra Government Act in the year 2017.

THEME

Usage of Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts in the field of law.

OBJECTIVES

To promote and encourage sharing of information amongst attendees regarding the fundamentals of Blockchain Technology (BCT)

To provide attendees with educational sessions and sometimes technological displays encompassing the best and most current information in the particular field. To generate activities of a professional association.

IMPORTANT DATES

  • Registration Start Date: September 20, 2022
  • Last day for registration: September 28, 2022
  • Date of Seminar: September 30, 2022

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScVmC8MmzqBfYGQ4cNxGceJ_w6ReBp-3ZXbEyveFhDhGtCrBA/viewform

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

The Chair on Consumer Laws at National Law University, Delhi in association with the Department of Consumer Affairs, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Government of India is organizing the 4th edition of the National Quiz Competition (Online) 2022 on Consumer Protection Laws on November 12, 2022.

ABOUT

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 came into effect in August 2019. It has repealed and completely overhauled the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with the objective to provide timely and effective administration and settlement of consumer disputes.

Consumer protection laws represent one of the most critical components of the market architecture of the economy with a wide range of stakeholders. It is essential that the students of law, commerce, management, and all other streams understand the nuances of this specialised subject through both education and training in this field.

ELIGIBILITY

Undergraduate students, from all disciplines, may participate in an individual capacity.

AWARDS

  1. 1st position: ₹6,000
  2. 2nd position: ₹4.000
  3. 3rd position: ₹2,000
  4. All participants will be issued Certificates of Participation. The Quiz promises to be an enriching and exciting way of learning more about consumer protection laws in India.

DEADLINE

October 25, 2022, 11:59:59 PM

RULES

  • A maximum of three students from a single College/University may register: participants will be shortlisted on a first-come-first-served basis. Only applicants who have been successfully registered shall be contacted for further details.
  • Further, no winner of any previous editions of the quiz can participate in the 2022 edition.
  • The participants are advised to have seamless internet connectivity. In case a participant logs out or disconnects from the quiz at any time due to internet connectivity or otherwise, they will be treated as an ‘external person’ for the remainder of the quiz; i.e. they cannot rejoin the Quiz. The organizers will NOT entertain any complaints regarding connectivity in view of the sanctity of the National Quiz
  • Each participant shall provide one valid email address to the Chair at the time of registration.
  • The Chair has the sole discretion to enforce, clarify, interpret the rules; resolve any disputes that may arise during the Competition and has the power to change/supplement the rules, if any changes or supplements are necessary.

DETAILS

  • Participants may register online through the link given at the end of this post.
  • There is no registration fee.
  • Registration will close at 11:59:59 pm on October 25, 2022.
  • Upon registration, shortlisted participants will receive detailed Rules of Procedure for the Quiz including instructions for preliminary and final rounds, marking scheme, duration, scoring and other relevant details.

https://docs.google.com/forms/u/2/d/e/1FAIpQLScrsc2Qo1UBr9LdSAuQpcwVGRELi3r2M04SKqY0nOyzEvZ4Vg/viewform?usp=send_form

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

NLIU Bhopal and ICFAI Dehradun are organizing an e-Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law on November 17 and 18, 2022.

ABOUT

The e-conference aims to garner a strong academic response to address the legal issues associated with AI applications.

This e-conference shall invite panel discussions from eminent speakers and shall have sessions revolving around the various aspects of AI in the litigation industry to discuss the opportunities and regulatory issues with respect to AI.

ELIGIBILITY

Academicians, Researchers, Students, Cyber Professionals, Cyber Stakeholders, Cyber Forensic Experts, Advocates, and Information Technology Professionals.

THEME

  • AI and Human Rights
  • AI and Ethics
  • AI and Legal Personality
  • AI as Sentient
  • AI and Sustainable Development
  • AI in Health and Medicine
  • AI in Economic Growth and Decent Work
  • AI and Environment Protection
  • AI and Quality Education
  • AI, Peace and Justice
  • AI and Constitutional Law
  • AI and Privacy
  • AI and Fundamental Rights
  • AI and Regulatory Framework
  • AI and International Law
  • AI and Indian Legal System
  • AI and Cybercrimes
  • AI and Civil Liability
  • AI and Intellectual Property Rights
  • AI and Copyright
  • AI and Patent
  • AI and Other Intellectual Properties
  • AI and its Applications
  • AI and Governance
  • AI and Digital Forensics
  • AI, Machine Learning and Deep Learning

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

  • The authors are required to identify the broad theme for their proposed research paper to help us allocate the subject expert for the review of their research paper.
  • An author may write the research paper with a maximum of two co-authors.
  • The submitted research papers will be evaluated based on relevance to the theme and broad topics of the Conference, originality of the research paper, policy significance and engagement with the broader research area of Artificial Intelligence and Law. The papers may be theoretical, applied, or policy-oriented.
  • The presented papers will be published in the form of a book with ISBN after the author incorporates the suggestions/changes suggested during the discussion/questions session.
  • Other than paper presenters, any other research scholar or working professionals, who wish to participate in the seminar, are welcome to register and attend the e-Conference.
  • Abstract and full papers should be sent to aiandlaw[at]nliu.ac.in
  • Abstract: 500 Words; Full Paper: 3000 to 5000 Words.
  • Abstract/ Full Paper should have a cover page containing: Full name and Designation along with Institution/Organization/University and Professional/Educational details; Email address and telephone number.
  • The submission should be in MS word, i.e., doc/Docx format, with the following specification:
  • Font: Times New Roman; Line Spacing: 1.5 Points; Font Size: Title: 16 Points; Sub-Title : 14 Points; Text: 12 Points
  • OSCOLA Citation method should be followed.
  • Interested candidates may register for the seminar through the link provided at the end of this post.
  • A minimum of two subject experts will review the abstract, and the selected presenters will be notified.
  • The accepted presenters should send their full papers.

REGISTRATION FEE

  • Indian Participants: Rs. 300/-.
  • Indian Paper Presenter (Single Author): Rs. 500/-.
  • Indian Paper Presenter (Co-Authors): Rs. 800/-.
  • Foreign Participants: USD 5
  • Foreign Paper Presenter (Single Author): USD 10
  • Foreign Paper Presenter (Co-Authors): USD 15

AWARDS

The three best research papers and three best paper presenters in the e-Conference will be awarded:

  • First – Rs. 8,000/- [USD 100]
  • Second – Rs. 6,000/- [USD 75]
  • Third – Rs. 4,000/- [USD 50]

IMPORTANT DATES

  • Abstract Submission: 10 October 2022
  • Notification of Selected Papers: 17 October 2022
  • Submission of Full Paper: 7 November 2022
  • Last Date of Registration: 15 November 2022
  • e-Conference Date: 17-18 November 2022

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf-5LeLh-qyTakumXyIEsEB9dP3EcARVc_MSg_VyL4xGnMijw/viewform

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Gujarat National Law University is inviting applications for Research Assistant – Under the project on Victim Compensation Scheme funded by The West Bengal National University of Juridical Science.

ABOUT

The Gujarat National Law University is a public law school and a National Law University established under the Gujarat National Law University Act, 2003 in the state of Gujarat.

TITLE

Implementation of Victim Compensation Scheme for the women victims in the State of Gujarat.

ROLES

  • Provide research assistance to Principal Investigator/Co-Investigators;
  • Conduct interdisciplinary research in view of the aim and objectives of the Project;
  • Developing qualitative and quantitative tools, and making qualitative and quantitative research analyses.
  • Collecting data, a compilation of datasets and interpretation of data analysis and report writing;
  • Perform project-related duties including administrative, coordination, etc. required to achieve the aim and objectives of the project;
  • Any other research or project-related work which may be assigned by the Principal Investigator/Co-Investigator.

ELIGIBILITY

  • Master’s Degree in Law, Criminology or Social Work with at least 55% (or an equivalent grade in a point scale wherever grading system is followed) from an Indian University, or an equivalent degree from an accredited foreign university; or Research Scholar in Law Criminology or Social Work.
  • Interest in Criminal Law is essential.
  • Good knowledge of the latest national and international research trends and developments in Law.
  • Working experience in MS Office, basic knowledge of information technology.
  • Strong analytical skills, excellent English writing and communication abilities and the ability to manage research projects.
  • Working knowledge of Gujarati and Hindi.

DESIRABILITY

  • Experience in court practice (Criminal Procedure), teaching/research in premier law universities/colleges.
  • Experience in empirical legal research.
  • Publication of research paper/article in reputed journal.
  • Presentation/Participation in State or National Level Conference/Symposium;.
  • Excellent interpersonal and team-building skills.
  • Ability to innovate and improve academic programmes or services and to pursue interesting new ideas and new methods.
  • Female candidates shall be preferred.

APPLICATIONS

Interested candidates may download the application form available at the end of this post, fill out the same and send it via email to hr@gnlu.ac.in along with a short CV highlighting suitable qualifications connected with the research project and a brief write-up on the implementation of Victim Compensation Schemes for the women victims (1500 words), mentioning the subject line as “Application for the Post of Research Assistant – Under the project on Victim Compensation Scheme funded by The West Bengal National University of Juridical Science (NUJS)”.

DEADLINE

October 4, 2022

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FMtJ9cqdlvCJ7PcI3AKnXS4Tg2lIBvzi/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=114468367575402765300&rtpof=true&sd=true

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Adv. Balasaheb Apte College of Law is organising its tenth edition of the National level Intercollegiate Mock Trial, Judgement Writing and Moot Court Competition, from October 14 to 16, 2022.

ABOUT

People’s Education Society’s ‘Adv. Balasaheb Apte College of Law’ is to host its tenth edition of the National level Intercollegiate Mock Trial, Judgement Writing and Moot Court Competition, from October 14 to 16, 2022 at Adv. Balasaheb Apte College of Law, Dadar (West), Mumbai.

This Annual Event of Adv. Balasaheb Apte College of Law, Mumbai is hosted in the fond memory of Late Shri. Balwant Parshuram Apte (widely known as Adv. Balasaheb Apte), is a distinguished legal luminary and also a noted parliamentarian.

ELIGIBILITY

Bona-fide LL.B. students pursuing 3 or 5 years degree courses during the academic year 2022-23 are eligible to participate. The students must be deputed by their respective colleges. Students above the age of 25 years as of October 14, 2022, are not permitted to participate in this competition.

LOCATION

This is an Offline Event which will be held on campus at People’s Education Society’s, Adv. Balasaheb Apte College of Law, Principal N. M. Kale Marg, Gokhale Road (South), Dadar (West), Mumbai – 400 028.

(Accommodation shall be provided to the teams requesting the same. Kindly refer to the Rules and Regulations for the provisions of accommodation)

REGISTRATION PROCEDURE

  • Only 24 teams will be registered to participate in the competition on a first-come-first-serve basis. The participants shall register their entries by emailing the duly filled and scanned Registration Form (soft copy) on or before, September 25, 2022, from their college official email-id to ‘mootabacl@gmail.com’ thereafter, the participants shall receive an acknowledgement on successful submission of their registration.
  • The first 24 teams shall be receiving a confirmation mail on their selection for participation. Participants receiving the confirmation of acceptance shall be expected to send the Registration Form (hard copy) along with the registration fees on or before September 30, 2022.
  • The registration fees shall be INR 3,000/- which can be payable by UPI with the UPI ID being “Abacl@jsb”. The participants shall send the screenshot of the UPI payment to mootabacl@gmail.com.
  • The participants can also make the payment by a Demand Draft in favour of “Adv. Balasaheb Apte College of Law”. If the participants are opting for demand draft as a mode of payment, then the participants shall send the demand draft with the registration form by post or courier on or before September 30, 2022. The address is mentioned above in Para. 4 of the Rules & Regulation.

PRIZES

  • Winning Team: INR 20,000/-
  • Runner Up Team: INR 10,000/-
  • Best Student Advocate: INR 7,500/-
  • Winner of Judgement Writing competition: INR 7,500/-

IMPORTANT DATES

  • Acceptance of Registration forms (softcopies): September 25, 2022
  • Extended deadline for acceptance of Registration form (soft copy): September 29, 2022
  • Acceptance of Registration forms (hardcopies) along with Demand Draft (if opting for payment by DD) upon receipt of confirmation of registration following the dispatch of scanned copy of the Registration Form by the Participating Team: September 30, 2022
  • Last Date to seek clarification in respect of the Competition: October 2, 2022
  • Deadline for soft copy submission of Written Submissions/Memorials: October 8, 2022
  • Orientation ceremony (at 5.00 pm): October 14, 2022
  • Preliminary Round (Reporting time to the college at 8.00 am sharp): October 15, 2022
  • The Judgement Writing Competition after the Preliminary Rounds’: October 15, 2022
  • Semi-final round (at 9.00 a.m.) and thereafter the Final Round. Thereafter, the Valedictory function followed by the Prize Distribution Ceremony: October 16, 2022

LINKS

PROPOSITION

RULES

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd