LQF is looking for individuals who can work with us on intersectional projects falling under the domain of environment. You would be required to research & write on varied themes and topics under any given project. You will be required to analyse the present laws and policies under the domain, and recommend improvements in structures to ensure that the rights of marginalised communities are upheld and not subjugated.

Selected intern’s day-to-day responsibilities will include:

1. Working on various research projects assigned to them by the organization
2. Research and analysis of case laws, judgements, orders, rules, notifications, et. al.
3. Conducting research on and writing about latest law & policy issues
4. Drafting write-ups and reports
5. Researching on, reviewing and recommending improvements in legislation, policies
6. Ensuring initiation of discourse on issues of import

Mode of Internship: Online

Time Commitment:
A minimum of 4 hours per day, for five days a week. (Monday to Friday)

Tenure:
2 Months (can be increased based on your availability & work performance)

Eligibility Criteria:
Academicians, Legal Professionals, Research Scholars, PG & UG Students of Law and any other related Social Science disciplines are eligible to apply for the role.

English proficiency is a must, as all resources need to be prepared in English.

Takeaways:
Intensive training and exposure under the domain
Opportunity for internal & external publication(s)
Opportunity to engage with multiple national & international stakeholders including law & policy experts
Opportunity to represent LQF at national & international fora
Certificate on the successful completion of your tenure
Letter of Recommendation (based on the assessment of the performance)

Stipend: This is an unpaid & voluntary position.

How to Apply?

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeJZax4VP1Z4n5LAurS4PmGZN5TZLPzJgpCM0GcKvM_U9LJUw/viewform

Contact Details:


Email ID: work.lexquest@gmail.com
Contact Number: 9650563263

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Job Description

Required 2 lawyers in a reputed law firm based out of Defence Colony, South Delhi, extensively dealing in Corporate Law, Commercial Litigation & Arbitration Matters.

Job Requirement:

1 Lawyer having PQE of 1-2 years, in Litigation Firm having good drafting and research skills.

Job Requirement: 1 lawyer having 2-3 years of PQE in Litigation firm having very good set of drafting & research skills, able to attend miscellaneous dates, prepare & manage briefs/clients etc.

Note: Emoluments shall be as per Industry standards.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may please send resume/CV on:

vireslegal@gmail.com

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Abstract


The pay gap is an issue for our country because it prohibits the country to become a superpower
in economic areas. This article prescribes the “Equal pay for equal work” and Constitutional and
Labor legislation concepts in Acts like the Equal Remuneration Act, Contract Labor, and
Factories Act, etc. The Directive Principle of State Policy defined under Part IV of the
Constitution has provision for equal pay for equal work. It also states where can be discriminated
against or not in payment. 

Introduction


Equal pay for equal work means an equal payment to someone who has been employed in the
same place and does the same work. Even the temporary worker who has done the same work in
the same shift should get equal payment in comparison to the permanent worker.
Constitutional provisions


Article 14 – Equality before the law means every person is equal in the eyes of Law there should
not be discrimination. Everyone has equal rights and opportunities . 
Article 15(1) – Prohibition of discrimination against citizens of India on grounds of caste or sex
which means no one can be distinguished and unfavorable to the person. This means the
employer will get equal payment from an employer either from a different caste or a woman .
Article 15(3) – It is the exception of Article 15 clauses 1 and 2. The state can make laws for
women and children to improve the situations of women and children . 
Article 16 – Equal opportunity in public employment .
Article 39 – It is defined that the State should direct the policies for equal remuneration to both
men and women. This means if both the parties are doing equal work then they should be paid
equally without any discrimination. If the people are in the same post or either different place
then he should get equal payment.
Article 42 – The state should ensure and make provision for the workplace should be a humane
condition for women and make provision for maternity relief . 
Article 51(A) (e) – To abolish the practices against women’s dignity .


The term equal also includes allowances benefits and promotions. The directive principles are
not enforceable by law. The state must make legislation for the prohibition of discrimination in
payment. Also, it is a fundamental right under Articles 14, 15 and 16. Various judgments have
been decided through fundamental rights.  Equal pay for equal work was first acknowledged in
the case Kishori Mohanlal Bakshi v. Union of India , in which the Supreme Court held that the
court cannot enforce the court of law. In 1987, in the case, Mackinnon Mackenzie & Company

Limited v. Audrey D coastal & others , the woman who was a stenographer was discriminated
against based on sex she paid less than men. The court held that it is discrimination against
women. When both men and women are doing the same work in the same circumstances they
should be paid equally.
Randhir Singh v. Union of India , in this case, the court held that the equality for equal work is
mentioned in directive principles and directive states and not under the fundamental right but is
considered a Constitutional goal. The court can enforce constitutional remedies prescribed under
Article 32.
State of Punjab and Ors v. Jagjit Singh and Ors , in this case, the court held that the workers
who are doing temporary work, ad hoc and daily wages should get equal payment which is given
to the permanent worker. To refuse the equal payment is oppressive, coercive and exploitative
behavior with them.


Statute related to equal pay for equal work


Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923

  • Those workers accidentally injured during work should be compensated by companies.
  • Because of differences in negotiating power, women may be exploited.


Minimum Wages Act, 1948

  • The state has fixed minimum wages in the territory. This means an employer cannot give less than the fixed wages.
  • Workers are poorly organized & have less negotiating power in India. Because in India there is also the problem of employment so the workers are accepting the money without negotiation.


Factories Act, 1948

  • The object of this Act is to improve the conditions of laborers in factories and industries.

Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970


The object was to make this Act that there should be a separate provision for utilities and fix
working hours for the women.


Equal Remuneration Act, 1976


In 1975, this was passed as equal remuneration Ordinance, 1975 and further converted into an
Act, the Equal remuneration Act, 1976. Women were not getting equal payments and working
conditions according to them. The Act made for improvement of the women condition in
remuneration. The provision of the Act is against discrimination in the recruitment and
promotion of men and women. When this Act was enacted, they considered the physical & social
burden a woman faces or the condition of the women during their pregnancy time.


In the case, Dharwad District P.W.D. Literate Daily Wage Employees Association and
others v. State of Karnataka and others
. the court in this case held that Sec. 5 of the equal remuneration Act states that there shall be no discrimination against women in their appointment,
recruitment, and promotion. It means if both men and women are working in the same condition
then women should not be discriminated on these. The employer should maintain a register or
documents to avoid unjust practices. 


Code on Wages Act, 2019 


This Act considered equal pay for equal work for all genders. Under Sec.16 of this Act has given
the power to the employer that they can fix wages based on monthly, daily, or weekly but not
more than a month.


Exceptions of equal pay for equal work


This is mentioned in our Constitution in Directive Principles and Directive States. However, it is
not an absolute right. Exceptions are not mentioned but they came from the cases.

In the case F.A.I.C and C.E.S v. Union of India 13 , the court held that employers can fix
different pay scales for employees who have a similar post and work but there is a difference
between responsibility, reliability, and confidentiality.  Equal payment depends on the work that
has been done and not the volume of work.


International Perspective 


The problem related to equal remuneration is not only limited to India but is worldwide. This has
been discussed at various conventions. The Equal Remuneration Convention, 1952 states that
there should not be discrimination against equal remuneration.
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has stated that it doesn’t matter if the labor is male
or female if they are doing equal work with equal capacity, there is no requirement of the gender
pay gap. 


Gender pay gap


This means the difference between the earnings of men and women who are involved in the same
work. India ranks the last 10 in female participation. Female participation is a very low rate in
rural areas compared to urban areas. Women are not educated. This is also the reason. 


Conclusion 


In India, we have many statutes which talk about how everyone should get equal pay for equal
work. But the inequality in recruitment still exists. Court has decided in many cases that it is the
right of the employees to get equal payment. Government should organize a campaign for
awareness towards equal recruitment to labour. 


Every individual should be equally paid there should not be discrimination but employers can
discriminate based on responsibility and volume of work done by employees.

This article is written by Prachi Yadav, a 2 nd Year student from Mody University of Science and
Technology, Laxmangarh, Rajasthan.

CITATION


(1862) 11Cb (NS) 869, EWHC CP J35; 142 ER 1037


APELLANT

Bindley


RESPONDENT


Paul felthouse


DECIDED ON

8 th July 1862


COURT

Court of Exchequer chamber

JUDGES


Willies, byles and Keating JJ

AREA OF LAW


Acceptance


BACKGROUND


Uncle felthouse was quite interested with his nephew’s horse. So, he sends a letter to his
nephew as a proposal to buy the horse which stated: “if I hear no more about him, I’ll
consider the horse is mine for 30.15 shilling”. The nephew received the letter of Mr Felthouse
and decided to sell his horse to him. But he failed to respond to the offer. Suddenly, the
nephew faced an auction of the property and told the auctioneer, Mr.bindley to auction all his
property except the horse. On the day of auction, Bindley forgot to spare the horse from the
auction. As the horse was a good breed it had a great demand in the auction and Mr. Bindley
accidently sold the horse to another person for 33 shillings. When felthouse came to know
about the incident he sued the auctioneer under the tort of conversion (usage of someone
else’s property inconsistently with their right). This made felthouse to prove the contract
valid by showing that the horse was his property. Bindley stated that Mr. Felthouse doesn’t
have any ownership over the horse even though the nephew had an interest to sell the horse.

Since it wasn’t communicated properly, the contract doesn’t seem to be valid. The major
issue raised in this case was whether the silence or failure to reject an offer amounts to
acceptance. The court finally ruled that felthouse did not have any ownership over the horse
as there was no acceptance from his nephew’s side. This is a landmark case in the history of
contract law which states that no one can necessitate anyone to make a decision on to reject
or accept an offer and it also states that mere silence does not amounts to acceptance.


FACTS


1 Paul felthouse send a proposal to his nephew John felthouse in the form of a letter to
buy his horse, which stated: “if I hear no more about him, I’ll consider the horse is
mine for 30.15 shilling”.
2 Despite having the intention to sell the horse, the nephew never had accepted the
proposal. So, he told the auctioneer, Bindley to exempt the horse from the auction.
3 Mr. Bindley forgot about the condition and sold the horse for 33 shillings to another
person.
4 Paul felthouse sued Bindley under the tort of conversion by stating the horse as his
own.


ISSUE

  1. Whether there exists any valid contract between the uncle felthouse and his nephew.
  2. Whether the silence or failure to convey the rejection of an offer amounts to acceptance of the proposal.


JUDGEMENT


It was held by the court was there wasn’t any valid contract existed between felthouse and his
nephew. Despite having an intention to sell the horse, there wasn’t any acceptance to the
proposal from his nephew’s side. A proposal will only get emanated as a contract where there
is an acceptance to the proposal. Hence it was stated that silence or failure to convey the
rejection of a proposal will not amounts to acceptance of the offer.


RATIO DECENDI

  1. You cannot exert your decisions on an unwilling party.
  2. Silence or failure to convey rejection of an offer will not amounts to acceptance.
  3. You cannot assume acceptance if there is no notification of acceptance or implied acceptance through action present.


CONCLUSION


The case Felthouse v. Bindley was a turning point in the history of contract law. In this case it
was proved that there wasn’t any contract between the uncle and his nephew.it thus proved
that silence will not amount to an acceptance to a contract.

This article is written by Nourizen Nizar, student of Government Law College, Ernakulam, Kerala

Joining the Innovation team at Galaxy will mean that you will be challenged to continually learn, grow and develop. You will get an opportunity to thrive in a culture which is friendly, encouraging and hard-working which enables to achieve exceptional results and bring about positive change in individual and organisation alike. This is a fantastic opportunity for someone eager to build their knowledge, skills and leadership capabilities.

This position is a part of the Innovation process in Galaxy and comes under the Intellectual Property Rights group. It is an important sub- process where we undertake patent filing in various geographies of our business interest, defending our patent applications, opposing competitor’s patent and safeguarding the path of our business by doing other various activities. The newcomer will protect the organization’s patent applications and support the Research & Development.

 Key Deliverables:

  • Filing patent applications in the various geographies of our business interest.
  • Prosecution of patent applications worldwide
  • Coordinating with the Patent Attorneys for prosecution of patent applications for the organization.
  • Communicate with the inventors on the outcome of the examination and consider their responses while preparing a final response.
  • Conducting patent search and retrieving technical information relevant to invention using databases such as Scifinder, Patbase, Espacenet.
  • Involvement in the other various IPR activities like answering requests from other processes, taking caring care of technical and non- technical support in IPR.

Functional Knowledge and Skills:

  • Oral and written communication
  • Drafting & Scientific data reporting

The required person/s should have analytical skill and should be good in conceptual thinking. He/she should also be good with doing literature survey.

WORK EXP: 0-2 years

QUALIFICATION: Ph.D in Organic chemistry, Synthetic/ Surfactant/ Bio- organic Chemistry

WORK LOCATION â€“ Navi Mumbai

(Galaxy Surfactants is an equal opportunity employer and makes employment decisions without regard to race, colour, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability status, age, or any other status protected by law.)

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Job Description

Purpose of the role – This Job is responsible for providing all legal guidance and support relating to private and public fund raising issues (debt and equity), mergers, acquisitions, divestments, QIPs etc. with a focus on enabling the deals.

Job role :

(i) Provide legal guidance and support on fund raising, financial restructuring, M&A etc:

  • Equity capital market transactions
  • IPO’s, QIP’s, Rights Issue, OFS, etc
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Schemes of Arrangements
  • Preferential Allotments and other Fund /Capital Raising transactions by way of equity, preference shares or equity convertibles
  • Investments & Divestments   
  • Corporate Actions (such as buy-backs, stock splits, reductions of share capital, bonus issues, stock consolidations, conversions)
  1. Effectively lead the legal due diligence process & assure closure within highly critical, assigned timelines 
  2. Advise on corporate law, legal and compliance issues and other regulatory requirements

     (iv) Drafting and review transaction documents & finalization of definitive agreement, non-compete agreement, non-disclosure agreement pertaining to the transaction

     (v) Effectively and efficiently liaise with internal and external stakeholders and transaction counsels on the Transactions

   (vi) Review and negotiate general commercial contracts

  • Preparing deal bibles
  • Due diligence
  • Research oriented assignments

    (vii) Provide general legal advisory and support on legal issues

Qualifications & Experience:

LLB / LLM with 14-15 years of expertise into the aspects – we are not looking for Drafting or Litigation expert or a General Counsel.

For More details visit-

https://www.antal.com/job/corporate-legal-specialist-leg01

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Legal @Dream Sports:

Dream Sports (DS) Legal is the inhouse legal function that supports all divisions within Dream Sports ecosystem on varied legal issues relating to the existing as well as prospective businesses for the group ranging from General Corporate, M&A, Fundraise, Structuring, Litigation and Litigation strategy, IP strategy, registration, monitoring and enforcement, Data Protection etc.

Your Role:

  • Supporting the DS management in the creation of a long-term litigation strategy
  • Keeping track of all industry-relevant litigation across the specified territory    
  • Identifying and partnering with law firms who can deliver on the larger litigation strategy for the DS, both in terms of advice and execution
  • Preparing counsel briefing notes and briefing the counsels as and when required
  • Preparation of and execution of larger litigation strategy for the DS in line with the management objectives

Must Have:

  • 7 to 10 years of PQE in Litigation (management, appearances, drafting, briefing) as a counsel/advocate
  • Experience in briefing senior counsels
  • Excellent drafting/writing skills  
  • Understanding of litigation around constitutional/IP/commercial/ civil/criminal in lower as well as higher judiciary including writ jurisdiction

Good to Have:

  • Prior experience of having worked on gaming laws, taxation laws around gaming
  • Understands fantasy sports, sports streaming, content, e-commerce, Fintech industry in specific and Tech industry in general 

Dream Sports is a sports technology company with brands such as Dream11, FanCode, DreamX, DreamSetGo and DreamPay in its portfolio. Dream Sports is executing its vision of ‘Make Sports Better’ by providing multiple avenues for fans to deeply engage with the sports they love through fantasy sports, content, commerce, experiences and events, among others.
Founded in 2008 by Harsh Jain and Bhavit Sheth, the company has been ranked #7 among India’s Great Mid-Size Workplaces in 2020 and was recognised as one of the top 10 innovative companies in India by Fast Company in 2019. Kalaari Capital, Think Investments, Multiples Equity, Tencent and Steadview Capital are the marquee investors in Dream Sports.

Link to apply-

https://jobs.lever.co/dreamsports/d3309a69-0003-49b9-8e71-20a7ee29bdbd/apply

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Job Description for a Professor & Dean in the Faculty of Law:

  1. Developing a comprehensive and proactive strategic plan for the Faculty of Law that meets the challenges of a highly competitive market and aligns with the broader objectives of the University’s strategic plan
  2. Nurturing and expanding interdisciplinary relationships between Faculty of Law and other University programs
  3. Taking steps to better anticipate the needs of the external legal community in order to cultivate stronger relationships and have collaborative partnerships, Forge relationships with various law reforming organizations with the goal of developing joint projects and events
  4. Continuously improving student outcomes—including academics, job placement, and other quantitative and qualitative measures—and maintaining and enhancing a faculty & student centred environment
  5. Writing brief descriptions of academic research and further identify means to make it accessible and available to legislators, executive-branch policymakers, judges, and other government decision-makers charged with designing and implementing India’s judicial system
  6. Create and support a community of scholars who can serve as a vital resource for the media on issues of law and justice reform, Identify and pursue grant opportunities to further support work
  7. Coordinate with faculty members, scholars and others to solicit academic contributions for the university’s website

Prerequisites for the above position:

  • Outstanding legal academic credentials, including legal publications and legal practice
  • A deep appreciation for the legal profession and for legal scholarship
  • Administrative and intellectual leadership
  • Strong communication and interpersonal skills
  • Ability and commitment to integrate and advance the University’s core values, mission and vision into the operation and planning of the Faculty of Law
  • Demonstrated ability to innovate academic programs and organizations for increased effectiveness and responsiveness within a changing environment
  • Experience of a law college fundraising
  • Expertise in legal education, understanding of pedagogy, and commitment to experiential education with concern for, and interest in students
  • Record of involvement with, and understanding of, national legal education organizations
  • Commitment to diversity
  • Strong business acumen and experience managing large budgets
  • Record of strong leadership, including innovation, creativity, and a history of developing and maintaining consensus and cohesiveness within a law college

Only from “Faculty of Law” should apply for the job.

Link to apply

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/2707254205

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

OFFICE: Rera Advisor Juris Unitas LLP
LOCATION: Sector 62, Noida

POST: Intern
CGPA: 7.0 and above
PREFFERED: 5th year student
PERIOD: 3 months.
TIMINGS: 10:30 am to 6:30 pm (6 days a week)

MANDATES:

a) Intern required to come daily/physically to office. (Saturdays are WFH).
b) Carry his/ her own laptop.
c) Work can require him/ her to travel to courts. (Travelling allowance shall be reimbursed)

Stipend based on performance.

Interested candidates can email their CV on lawinternshipsunitas@gmail.com

Web Portal Link:

https://reraadvisors.com/

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd