About the Organisation

GnS Legal LLP is a full-service law firm with a focus on commercial law, advising on transactions, disputes, and projects. Founded by a group of graduates from National Law Schools, who have earlier worked with top-tier law firms and senior advocates, the firm aims to provide cost-effective yet quality legal services, devoid of legal jargon and time-consuming hierarchy. The partners, associates and co-counsels at the firm have a hands-on approach with all clients, matters and transactions, ensuring direct and focused communication at all times.

Experience required

PQE of 1 to 2 years for the Corporate Law team

Eligibility

Candidate should have prior experience in Agreements vetting and drafting and advisory work.

Application Process

All those who are interested can apply directly at abhay@gnslegal.in.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates on more opportunities, we can catch up at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/Iez749mZfpaGfG4x2J6sr9

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

ABOUT THE FIRM

SDS Advocates is a full-service law firm based out of Mumbai and has associate offices in Delhi and Bangalore. The firm faceted in inculcating ethics that best suit client’s needs and work towards the satisfaction of clients. The firm has over a period of time followed a high level of legal practice to get justice for several clients in the field of Litigation and Corporate Laws. Since its inception, they have developed a mechanism for efficient services. They have earned their reputation on the simple philosophy of “personal and prompt service and advice relevant to modern practical requirements of a business.”

The Firm specializes in Commercial Dispute Resolution, Mediation & Arbitration, Insolvency Laws with core practice in National Company Law Tribunal, White Collar Crime, Real Estate, Electricity Laws, Media & Entertainment Laws, Service Laws Banking & Finance, Maritime Law, Due-Diligence, Labour Laws, Property Laws, Project Finance & Syndication. The firm has also advised clients in the preparation of Complex Distribution Franchise Agreements, Power Purchase Agreements & Parallel Licence Applications under Electricity Act with adequate exposure to litigations under the Electricity Law, Oil & Gas.

JOB DESCRIPTION

SDS Advocates is looking to hire an Associate (non-litigation) on retainership basis with PQE of 1-2 years

  1. Practice Area: Corporate
  2. Position: Associate
  3. Location: Mumbai
  4. Retainership Fee: As per industry standard
  5. Candidates having experience in General Corporate, Banking and Finance, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Laws, and media laws will be preferred. The position is for the Mumbai location and no work-from-home is allowed.

APPLICATION PROCESS

Interested candidates can send their applications to recruitment@sdsadvocates.com and sachivkumar@sdsadvocates.com

Disclaimer: All information posted on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catch up at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

ABOUT THE FIRM

Upscale Legal is a multi-service law firm catering to the needs and interests of various Corporate houses, Financial institutions, Government agencies & departments, along with assisting in supplementary business & legal issues of our individual clients.

INTERNSHIP DESCRIPTION

  1. Location: New Delhi
  2. Experience: Student
  3. Mode: Offline/Physical 
  4. Duration: One month (November)
  5. Eligibility: For 4th and 5th year Law Students interested in General Corporate Advisory/PE/VC

APPLICATION PROCESS

Interested candidates can send their applications to info@upscalelegal.com

Disclaimer: All information posted on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catch up at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Introduction

Foreign Portfolio Investment is holding financial assets in a country other than in the investor’s own country. It is an investment in mutual funds, bonds and securities (stocks, American Depositary Receipts, or Global Depository Receipts) of companies headquartered outside the investor’s nation. The transaction of foreign securities occurs at an organized formal securities exchange or through an over-the-counter market transaction. Foreign portfolio investment is becoming a means of portfolio diversification. The portfolio is a collection of financial assets and investments owned by an individual, a financial institution or an investment firm. Financial assets include valuables ranging from stocks, funds, derivatives property, cash equivalents, bonds, etc. In India SEBI regulates the activities involve in investment. It sets the eligibility criteria, limits the amount that can be invested and categorizes the type of investments. 

Categories for Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI)

The Foreign Portfolio Investors in India are divided into Three Categories:

Category I foreign portfolio investor:  Government and investors related to Government which includes central banks, Governmental agencies, wealth funds and international or multilateral organizations or agencies.

Category II:  In this category FPI like appropriately regulated Mutual Funds, Investment trusts, insurance/reinsurance companies, banks, asset management companies, investment managers/ advisors, portfolio managers, university funds and pension funds etc.

Category III: All those investors that do not fall under Category I and II foreign portfolios investors such as endowments, charitable societies, charitable trusts, foundations, corporate bodies, trusts, individuals and family offices.

Every Foreign Portfolio Investor is required to obtain Registration for FPI with Designated Depository Participant (DDP) on Behalf of SEBI.

SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations 2014 (“2014 Regulations”) have provided certain exemptions from registration to foreign institutional investors and qualified foreign investors. 2019 Regulations have scrapped some of these exemptions and it has made a mandate that every person dealing in securities as FPI to mandatorily acquire a registration certificate from the Designated Depository Participant. Further, existing offshore funds set up by Indian mutual funds existing offshore have to register themselves as FPIs by March 22, 2020. In 2014 Regulations eligibility for FIP license was only given to those central banks which are members of the Bank of International Settlement. Whereas through the 2019 regulations, SEBI in order to attract more investors recognized non-BIS registered central banks as eligible for FPI license. Under the FPI 2014 Regulations, a fund should not be registered as an FPI if it fails to qualify the broad-based criteria. A fund qualified as a broad-based fund if it had at least 20 investors with no investor holding more than 49% shares of the fund. 2019 Regulations have scrapped away with this requirement. 

The 2019 Regulations provide that FPIs set up in the International Financial Services Centre (“IFSC”) are required to satisfy the jurisdiction criteria under Regulation 4 for registering as an FPI. An entity set up in an IFSC is qualified to be registered as an FPI even though that entity would be a domestic entity.

Investment limit: The FPI regulations regulate and provide for a threshold on the total investment incurred by each company by the FPI including its investor group. The FPI Regulation of 2014 had set the investment threshold of 10 per cent of the issued capital of the company. Under the 2019 Regulations, the threshold has now been changed to 10 per cent of the ‘fully diluted paid-up equity capital of a company. 

Classification of Category I

Under the 2014 FPI Regulations, FPIs were divided into 3 categories under which easier compliance norms for Category-I FPIs were given and the strictest for Category-III FPIs. Under the new framework of 2019 Regulations, SEBI decided to reduce the total number of categories and to re-categorize into two categories, Category I and Category II FPIs. 

FPI Registration

Companies that issue shares and securities would be registered under the stock exchange. An Indian company that wishes to register its securities on the stock exchange would have to abide by the rules established by the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI). An investor who wants to indulge themselves with Foreign Portfolio Investment has to make an application and obtain a certificate of registration from the respective board. The offshore fund which falls under the purview of an Asset Management Company is required to make an application under Foreign Portfolio Investor Registration. The offshore fund is required to secure such registration within a period of 180 days.

Under the SEBI (FPI) regulations, 2019 any applicant would have to liaise with the Designated Depository Participant (DDP) for making such an application for foreign portfolio investor registration. A DDP can be defined as a person or an institution who has been approved by the board under Chapter III of the 2019 regulations. In order to take different forms into consideration for registering under FPI, the DDP would act as a negotiator between the applicant and the board.

Procedure to get registration

1. Appoint a legal representative: 

 Legal representatives are required in India to fill out the forms and do the paperwork as required by the regulatory authorities. The role of a legal representative can be performed by any financial institution regulated by the Reserve Bank of India. It is important to choose DDP to get registered as FPI. 

2. Appoint a Tax adviser: 

A tax advisor will help the investor to comply with all Tax obligations that will arise from your activities in India. It is very much required for the investor to know about the tax obligations on him for the smooth running of functions. The tax adviser advises whether the tax involved is reasonable or not.

 3. Appoint a Domestic Custodian:

Appointing a domestic custodian before making any investments in India is a very important step. A domestic Custodian can be any entity registered according to the norms set by SEBI to carry on the activity of providing custodial services in respect of securities.

4. Appoint a designated Bank:

After the registration is done under an FPI it is important to appoint a Designated Bank.  The Designated Bank has a duty to open and maintain a foreign currency account and/or a Non-Resident Special Rupee Account. Designated Bank means any bank in India which has been given permission by the Reserve Bank of India to act as a banker to FPIs.

5. Appoint a trading member: 

A Trading member has the duty to execute trades for the FPI. An FPI can have multiple TM’s.

6Appoint a clearing member: 

The clearing member does the confirmation of trades. Clearing through a single clearing member. 

7. Appointment of a Compliance Officer

Every FPI is required to appoint a compliance officer who shall be responsible for looking after the compliance of the Act, rules and regulations, notifications, guidelines, instructions etc. issued by the Board or the Central Government.

Impact of Foreign Portfolio Investment

Globalization has turned the world into a small village. The integration of economies of the world has led to the free flow of ideas, resources, people, and funds. Speaking of funds there is an enormous need for foreign investment in developing countries like India. India lacks funds, it has low infrastructural facilities and a huge population, keeping in mind these factors Foreign Portfolio Investment is a boon to the Indian Economy. It provides the investors with required profits, a huge market, labour at a cheap cost and so on. The capital account of India’s Balance of Payment consists of both FDI and FPI. FPI is one of the major sources of foreign capital in India. India requires this foreign capital for its growth and development. An inflow of foreign capital helps in removing a deficit in the balance of payment. Foreign investment has the ability to meet the gap in management, entrepreneurship, technology and skill. The developing countries need these resources that are transferred to the local country through various training programmes. Further, foreign companies bring with them advanced technological knowledge about production processes while transferring modern machinery equipment to the capital-poor developing countries.

Conclusion

Integration of the economies of the world has started a new era of setting and broadening business in different countries through Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Portfolio Investment. These investments have acted as a boon for the development of those countries where investment is made. To regulate such activities of investment laws are required to safeguard the rights of target countries. FPI Regulation of 2019 has widened the scope of investment and also eliminated certain limits on investors that earlier prevailed. For a developing country like India, foreign capital is a much-needed thing to develop its economy. India is making efforts to keep its economy open to the world yet protected from completely vanquishing its true nature.   


References

  1. www.sebi.gov.in › legal › regulations SEBI | Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign fastlegal.in › academy › securities-law Foreign Portfolio Investor (FPI) Registration In India

This article is written by Rishita Vekta, B.A.LLB(H) 2nd Year, from Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida U.P.

ABOUT THE FIRM

JAIN & PARTNERS is an IPR & Corporate law consultancy firm. It provides services to domestic companies, start-ups and individuals for their overseas investment and also to foreign companies and individuals for their investment in India in all respects that include Corporate Law, Intellectual Property Law, Foreign Exchange Management Law, Import Export Law and Taxation Law etc. Besides a vibrant and enthusiastic team of young professionals with good academic and practice backgrounds, our team of professionals consists of persons with a diverse and rich experience like Company Secretaries, Chartered Accountants, M.B.As, B.Scs, M.Scs and Lawyers. The firm has been established to provide ongoing or ad hoc advice on all kinds of matters to both large and small companies. We believe we are in a position to offer prompt and effective consultancy services to our clients and have a creative and positive approach toward solutions to problems as they arise. Time, quality and cost, are critical factors in all projects, our firm has been frequently appreciated for a quick turnaround on complex matters at a competitive cost.

INTERNSHIP DESCRIPTION

Jain & Partners are looking for two law interns. Kindly note, that it is a physical internship. Therefore, the candidate will be required to come to the office on daily basis.

  1. Joining: At the earliest
  2. Duration: Two months
  3. Area of Law: Intellectual Property Rights with prime focus on TRADEMARK LAW
  4. Eligibility: Students who are currently in their 2nd, 3rd and 4th year may apply
  5. Office Location: A-2/238, Sector-8, Rohini, Delhi – 110085

APPLICATION PROCESS

Interested candidates can send their applications to jainandpartners@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All information posted on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catch up at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

ABOUT THE FIRM

Jain & Partners is an ace IPR & Corporate law Consultancy firm having immense experience since the year 2001 in the area of IPR laws. It provides services to domestic companies or individuals for their overseas investment and also to foreign companies or individuals for their investment in India in all respects that include Corporate Law, Intellectual Property Law, Foreign Exchange Management Law, Import Export Law and Taxation Law etc. Besides a vibrant and enthusiastic team of young professionals with good academic and practice background, their team of professionals consist of persons with a diverse and rich experience like Company Secretaries, Chartered Accountants, M.B.As, B.Scs, M.Scs and Lawyers. The Firm has wide experience in handling opposition matters, trademark hearings, filing replies to examination reports, assignments etc. It also deals in patent and copyright matters. Its team involves renowned IPR consultants who have also been faculty in various seminars and query resolution programs for IPR laws.

 JOB DESCRIPTION

  1. Designation: Associate (IP Litigation)
  2. Experience – Experience of at least 2-3 years in IP Litigation is a must
  3. The candidate must have the ability to make effective submissions in courts, appear in IP matters in courts and tribunals, drafting and filing of pleadings and suits/complaints in courts
  4. He must be well versed in drafting of various IP litigation documents
  5. Having the ability to contribute to other departments of the Law Firm for associated Intellectual Property solvency, advisory, enforcement, etc
  6. Salary: As per Industry Standards
  7. Office Location: A-2/238, Sector-8, Rohini, Delhi – 110085

APPLICATION PROCESS

Interested candidates can send their applications with the subject “Application for Associate ( IP Litigation) at Jain & Partners” at the following email id: jainandpartners@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All information posted on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catch up at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

ABOUT THE FIRM

Formed in the year 1925, P N A M & Co. (formerly Soni Chatrath & Co.) is one of the oldest assurance, tax, and advisory firm of Chartered Accountants in India. With over 95 years of existence, our specialized team of accountants are entrusted to provide a comprehensive range of Assurance, Taxation and Corporate Advisory Services to clients in India and Worldwide.The firm provides robust compliance services and growth navigation solutions on complex business and financial matters through focused practice groups.

The firm is a member firm of Allinial Global. Allinial Global is an accounting firm association of legally independent accounting and consulting firms with offices in North America and throughout the world through international members and partnerships.

The team is comprised of highly qualified professionals who bring with them varied national and international experiences. With a good strength of qualified, semi qualified, paid staff and articles, the Team is bunch of highly motivated and dedicated personnel.

Service Capabilities :

  • Audit & Assurance
  • Taxation Advisory
  • Transaction & Risk Advisory
  • Corporate & Secretarial
  • Accounting Advisory

INTERNSHIP DESCRIPTION

  1. Assisting in all legal work.
  2. Should be well versed with procedural laws and drafting skills.
  3. The candidate will be required to fulfill a combination of one or more of the job responsibilities given below depending upon the nature of the project that is assigned to him/her.

Eligibility: Law students in their 3rd to 5th Year.

Location: New Delhi

Mode: Physical/Offline

HOW TO APPLY?

Interested candidates can email their latest CVs to hr@pnam.co and CC to rishabh.sachdeva@pnam.co

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Corporate Personality

A Corporate Personality also known as an ‘Artificial Juristic Person’ or simply as a legal entity, is an entity, body, or a group of members recognized by law to confer it with rights, duties, and obligations for its proper governance. It is a separate legal entity from its members, i.e., the entity conferred with such legal personality is not liable for the actions of its members, due to the veil of ‘Separate Legal Entity.’ The veil of ‘Separate Legal Entity’ is the separation of the members from the entity. It protects the entity from the actions of the members and vice versa, but when the members of the firm engage in illegal activities like fraud or other illegal activities, the veil is lifted thereby making each member liable for the actions of the other.

A corporation can be identified by comparison to many categories of objects that the law has chosen to personify. Members of a corporation are the people who make up its body. According to Section 34 of the Companies Act, 2013, certain conditions must be met for corporations to have legal personality –

  • There should be the existence of a group or body of people united for a certain objective.
  • The corporation must have organs through which it operates.

It has its own legal personality and can file and receive lawsuits in its own name. It is perpetual because it does not cease with the passing of any of its individual members. Contrary to natural beings, corporations can only act through their agents. The law specifies the steps to wind up a corporate organization.

Corporate Personality or the corporate veil came from the landmark case of Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd., in 1897, in the United Kingdom’s House of Lords. Salomon transferred his boot-making company, which he had previously managed in single ownership and control, to Salomon & Co. Ltd., a company he and his family founded. Salomon received shares and debentures with a floating charge on the company’s assets as payment for the transfer. Salomon’s claim of recovery against the debentures stood before the claims of unsecured creditors when the company’s operations failed and it entered liquidation, i.e., they would have received nothing from the proceeds of the liquidation. The Court of Appeal declared the corporation to be false or fake and gave their justification by arguing that Salomon had formed it outside the actual intent of the Companies Act, 1862 and that it had operated as Salomon’s agent, who should be liable for any debt incurred because of that agency.

The House of Lords, on appeal, overturned the decision, concluding that the company was properly incorporated and that it has independent legal status, with its own rights and obligations, and that “the motivations of those who participated in the company’s promotion are completely immaterial in addressing what those obligations and rights are.” The Salomon case effectively established the legal fiction of the “corporate veil” between the corporation and its owners/controllers.

The legal fiction of the corporate veil asserts that a corporation has a separate legal identity that is distinct and independent from the identities of its stockholders. As a result, any rights, responsibilities, or liabilities of a corporation are distinct from that of its members, who have “limited liability” and are only accountable for their share of capital. This corporate deception was created to allow groups of people to achieve an economic goal collectively without being personally liable or exposed to hazards. As a result, a business can act independently of its members to hold property, enter contracts, raise loans, make investments, and undertake other rights and obligations. Additionally, it simplifies the legal process because businesses then can sue and be sued in their own names.

Lifting the Corporate Veil

According to the Companies Act of 2013, lifting the corporate veil entails disregarding the fact that a corporation is a distinct legal entity with a corporate personality. Lifting the corporate veil in accordance with the Companies Act of 2013 disregards the distinct identity of the firm and focuses instead on the real members that oversee it. The entire concept of incorporation is built on the concept of a corporate entity, but the company’s distinct personality and legal privileges should only be used for lawful purposes. Individuals will not be permitted to hide below under the umbrella of a separate legal entity or corporate personality when the legal entity of the corporation is being utilized for fraudulent and deceptive purposes. In certain situations, the courts will pierce the corporate veil and use the “lifting or piercing the corporate veil” principle. The court will therefore investigate the corporate entity’s background.

In India, the Corporate Personality came in through the British common law system, when the colonial government introduced common law in India. Since then, many developments have taken place with respect to corporate personality. Through Sections 45, 147, 212, 247, and 542 of the Companies Act, 2013, official recognition has been conferred upon the concept of “lifting the corporate veil”. When the court does not take the corporation into account and instead is preoccupied with the members or management, the corporate veil is said to be lifted. In the following circumstances, the courts have deemed it necessary to overlook a company’s independent personality-

  1. Determination of a company’s true nature– In a time of emergency or war, it could be vital to look behind a company’s corporate façade to see if it is an enemy of the state. In such a situation, the courts can review the personalities of those who govern the company’s corporate affairs. In the case of Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental Tyre & Rubber Co., a firm was founded in England with the intention of selling tyres made in Germany by a German company; all the company’s shares, except for one, were held by Germans in Germany. A British citizen who served as the company’s secretary held the remaining share. Germans, therefore, held actual control over the English corporation. The business started legal proceedings to reclaim trade debts during World War I. Therefore, the question was about whether the Firm had turned into an enemy corporation because of World War I. The house of lords held that it can take on an enemy character if the people who are de facto in charge of its affairs reside in either enemy nation or, wherever they may dwell, are functioning as agents of foes. It was decided that the corporation was such an enemy firm for trading purposes and therefore the action could not be continued.
  2. For Revenue Benefit– As stated in the case of Juggilal Kamlapat v. Commissioner of Income Tax, the court has the authority to disregard a corporate entity if it is utilized for tax evasion or to dodge the tax obligation. The assessee in this case was a wealthy individual who earned sizable dividend and interest income. He established four private firms and agreed that each would act like an agent for a certain amount of investment. The corporation returned the money to him as fictitious loans even though the income received was recorded in the company’s books. The assessee founded the firm solely and simply to avoid paying super-tax, according to the court, and the assessee was the only shareholder.
  3. For Fraud or Misconduct– The courts will not uphold the company’s independent existence if it was established to violate the law, cheat creditors, or escape legal duties. The court in the case of P.N.B. Finance Ltd. v. Shital Prasad Jain stated the court, whenever it deems it necessary, may use its powers to use the principle of lifting the corporate veil to prevent a company use the corporate entity of a firm to engage in fraud or when the core values of the corporate personality have been disregarded by the members of a firm.
  4. State-owned Firms– Sometimes a firm loses its uniqueness to serve its principal and may be viewed as a trustee or agent. A film called “MANSOON” was made in India by an American business called F.G. Films Ltd. under the guise of a British firm. The president of the U.S.-based firm that provided the funding for the film’s production owned a controlling stake in this British corporation, which had a capital of £100. The Board of Trade declined to register the movie as a British picture under these circumstances on the grounds that the British firm in this instance just served as the trustee or representative of the U.S.-based firm. The Court agreed with this viewpoint. It was noted in the case of Smith Stone & Knight Ltd. v. Birmingham Corporation that courts find it challenging to go beneath a company’s corporate entity to ascertain if it is truly independent or is being utilized as an agent or trustee. If a holding firm and a subsidiary firm are separate legal entities under ordinary law and there is no agency agreement between the two businesses, then neither can be claimed to be the other’s agent. The connection of agency should be sufficiently demonstrated, as it was in the case of the current judgment if one corporation is held accountable as a primary for the actions of another company.
  5. Punish criminals in the quasi-criminal case against the firm– The courts can lift the veil of corporate personality in Quasi-criminal cases to punish actual persons who have violated laws, by analyzing the members behind an organization.
  6. Preventing the Process of Law abuse– The lifting of the corporate veil doctrine can also be utilized to stop judicial process abuse. Accordingly, the Court stated in the case of Bijay Kumar Agarwal v. Ratanlal Bagaria & Others that although the principle of lifting the corporate veil will be available in statutes like the Companies Act and other financial and taxing statutes, etc., one cannot rule out the appropriateness of the principle elsewhere because the situations are going to fall under the following groups; The following factors must be taken into consideration:

(a) the applicable statutory or some other laws;

(b) the goal that is being pursued;

(c) the contested conduct;

(d) the presence of a public interest aspect; and

(e) the impact on potentially affected parties.

Therefore, it follows logically that concept of lifting the corporate veil or a principle like it cannot be disregarded as a tool of the judiciary in resolving the disagreement between two parties. As a result, no specific act can claim exclusive rights to the concept of “Lifting of Corporate Veil” or a principal equivalent thereto. The judiciary or the Court may use it to stop the misuse of rule of law.

Conclusion

The doctrine or principle of corporate personhood or personality, also called an ‘Artificial Juristic Person’, was created by law to confer certain rights, duties, and obligations upon a group of people who conduct their business. It was done for the good governance of the entities these people were forming. To check for any discrepancies or misuse of the corporate veil, the courts introduced the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil, to check for the actions of the members. The courts can order the corporate veil to be lifted on various decisions including a firm being controlled by foreign enemies. Hence, we can say that the corporate personality is a real personality as the entities or groups who are conferred by these rights can operate their business with safety as well as not be liable for the collective action of other members unless the action taken is illegal or fraudulent. An entity after being conferred a corporate veil shall not be liable for the actions of its members unless such actions taken are illegal, fraud, or others, when the courts order the corporate vein to be lister.

References:

  1. Salomon v. Saolomon Co. & Ltd. UKHL, 1 AC, 22.
  2. Daimler & Co. v. Continental Tire and Rubber Company, UKHL 845, 2 AC 307.
  3. Guggilal Kampatlal v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 1970 AIR 529.
  4. P.N.B. Finance Ltd. v. Shital Prasad Jain, 19 (1981) DLT 368.
  5. Smith Stone & Knight Ltd. v. Birmingham Corporation,  [1939] 4 All ER 116 (KB).
  6.  Bijay Kumar Agarwal v. Ratanlal Bagaria & Others, AIR 1999 Cal 106.

This article is written by Namay Khanna, a 3rd year BBA LLB (Hons.) student at Symbiosis Law School, Pune.

About the Firm

AAA Legal is a law firm with an illustrative legacy of 14 years of practice and advisory. Areas of practice include Arbitration, Banking laws, Competition laws, Data protection, Employment and labour, Intellectual property including Innovation & Technology, Real estate, Customs laws and investigations, White-Collar Crime & Criminal laws Sectors: Automotive, Data Privacy advisory, E-commerce, Renewable Energy, Entertainment and Media, Infrastructure & Construction, Real Estate, Telecom & Technology.

Internship Description

  • Mode: Virtual/Online
  • Duration: 1 month (August)
  • Eligibility: Law students

How to Apply?

Interested candidates can email their CV to litigation@aaalegal.pro (The subject of the email should read ‘Virtual/Online internship for August 2022’).

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About Gray Matters LLP

Gray Matters is a firm providing its Consultation and Litigation services in the Corporate and Civil fields. With their immaculate expertise, they are adept at providing upgraded and innovative legal solutions to domestic and international clients. Their firm comprises a highly skilled team of professionals which includes Senior Advocates, Advocates, Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, Counselors as well as ExBankers. The Head office of their firm is quartered at Pune but they work in a far-reaching manner to take their services to both domestic as well as an international level. Gray Matters LLP adopts the highest standards of professionalism in their work by aiming to provide practical, feasible and innovative advice with time-bound deliverables to support all of their client’s business objectives and pave a much clearer path for them ahead rather than a bleak one.

About the Internship

Interns will be exposed to various fields of law to get practical knowledge of the legal field which includes:

  • Corporate
  • Consultation
  • Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • NCLT Matters
  • IBC
  • Drafting

Date for Interview: 22nd and 23rd July 2022.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates can send their updated CVs to adv.neerajrathi@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd