Equivalent Citation 1964 AIR 1882, 1964 SCR (8) 50 Bench HIDAYATULLAH, M. WANCHOO, K.N. GUPTA, K.C. DAS AYYANGNAR, N. RAJAGOPALA Decided on 29 APRIL, 1964 Relevant Act/ Section S. 69 OF INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932 (9 OF 1932) S. 8(2) OF ARBITRATION ACT, 1940 (ACT 10 OF 1940) Petitioner JAGDISH CHANDRA GUPTA Respondent KAJARIA TRADERSRead More
CASE NUMBER: Suit number 597 of 1961 EQUIVALENT CITATION: AIR 1964 CAL 239 BENCH: Single judge bench, Judge Bijayesh Mukherji presiding. DECIDED ON: Friday, 10th January 1964 RELEVANT ACT/SECTION: Section 68 of the Partnership Act, 1932 Section 28 of the Partnership Act, 1932 Section 67 of Evidence Act, 1872 Section 114 A of Evidence Act,Read More
Case Number CS (OS) 2011/2006 Equivalent Citation (2016) 226 DLT 647 Coram HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Decided on 22 DECEMBER 2015 Relevant Act/ Section SECTION 6 WITHIN THE HINDU SUCCESSION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2005 Background Before the enactment of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 women were considered physically and mentally inferior to men. TheRead More
Citation (2003) 6 SCC 265 Decided On 9th May 2003 Case Number Civil Appeal No. 13337 of 1995 Bench Bench: Shivraj V. Patil & K.G. Balakrishnan J.J. Relevant Section Section 32(2), 32(3) & 72 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Facts The plaintiff filed two suits against the respondent. Respondent number 1 in both the suitsRead More
INTRODUCTION This article focuses on the brief analysis of the case Shyam Sunder and Others v. The State Of Rajasthan. Equivalent Citation 1974 AIR 890 1974 SCR (3) 549 1974 SCC (1) 690 Bench K. K. Mathew (J.) Alagiriswami (J.) Author of the Judgement K. K. Mathew (J.) Decided on 12 March, 1974 Relevant Act /Read More
Citation (2020) 9 SCC 1 Decided On 11 August 2020 Case Number Civil Appeal No. 32601 of 2018 Bench Bench: Arun Mishra, S. Abdul Nazeer, M.R. Shah J.J. Relevant Section Section 6 of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 Facts The case is of joint Hindu family and coparcenary rights of the daughters. Section 6 ofRead More
Case Number Revision Petition 156 of 2020 Against the Order dated 14/08/2019 in Appeal No. 1242/2016 of the State Commission Karnataka Case Citation 2020 SCC OnLine NCDRC 8 Bench V.K. Jain in the New Delhi Bench of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Decided On 5 February 2020 Relevant Sections Consumer Protection Act, 2019- SectionsRead More
Case Number: CA 1903 Equivalent Citation: [1903] 1 K.B. 81 Bench: Collins, M.R. and Methew, J. Decided on: 19 November 1902 Relevant Act: The Partnership Act 1890 Brief Facts and Procedural History: In this case the defendant company is a partnership company with two partners, Mr Houston and Mr Strong, who represented the company. MrRead More
Case Number 1952 M. No. 2170 Case Citation [1953] 1 All ER 779 Bench Harman J. Decided On 23rd February 1953 Section Partnership- Dissolution Facts of the Case The plaintiff and the defendants were partners in a partnership at will and conducted the business of fashion and commercial photographers. The defendant wanted to start andRead More
Case Number (1906) AC 494 (PC) Bench The Earl of Halsbury, Lord Macnaghten, Sir Arthur Wilson, Sir Alfred Wills Author of the Judgement Lord Macnaghten Decided On 16 July 1906 Brief Facts and Procedural History There was a partnership between Goldberg- a land speculator, Trimble- an auctioneer and Bennet- a merchant, object being purchase andRead More
Lexpeeps Pvt Ltd provides tailored legal and business solutions, empowering businesses, startups, and professionals with innovative, comprehensive support and cutting-edge services for over half a decade.
© Copyright 2024 Lexpeeps All Rights Reserved | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy