Author: LEXPEEPS editor

About the Blog:

All India legal Forum (AILF) is a platform to provide valuable contemporary assessment of issues and developments in the legal field and also put forward quality legal content for the masses. The initiative aims to generate diverse social, political, legal and constitutional discourse on law related topics for the ever-growing legal fraternity. The platform distinguishes itself by promoting quality legal education and aims to tackle basic problems
which a legal researcher faces in day to day life from basic research to drafting. With the assistance and guidance of an exemplary Honorary and Advisory Board consisting of eminent jurists of The Supreme Court and professors from various National Law Universities and other prominent Law Schools, All India legal Forum poses as a paramount source of educational forum for the ever developing legal fraternity. 

Board of Advisors:

AILF is pleased to have support of diverse group of eminent personalities, comprising: Justice A.K. Sikri eminent jurist and an international Judge of the SICC; Advocate JLN. Murthy who is Vice Chair of the American Bar Association of United States and International Organizations; Dr. Vinod Surana, International Lawyer CEO & Managing Partner, Surana and Surana International Attorneys; Justice M.K.Sharma Former Judge Supreme Court of India, SL Bhayana, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India; Justice Amarnath Jindal; Prof. J.S. Patil is a Professor of Law and currently the Vice-Chancellor of National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam; Sr. Adv. Geeta Luthra, Delhi High Court Sr. Adv. Amit Trivedi, Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Lucknow; Sr.Adv. Dhruvin.U.Mehta Gujarat High Court and many more.

Themes or Topics:

We welcome blogs that address contemporary issues in any field of law. It will be appreciated if submissions are with respect to editorial commentary and candid views. We prefer posts which include critical analysis or explore
particular themes of wider resonance.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

For Submission Guidelines, visit us at :
https://allindialegalforum.wordpress.com/submission-guidelines/
For Assessment criteria, visit us at :
https://allindialegalforum.wordpress.com/assessment-criteria/

Entry Fee:

No entry fee will be charged. One person can submit as many articles as one wish and as frequently as one wishes to.

Important Dates and Deadlines:

All India Legal Forum is currently accepting submissions on a rolling basis.

How to Submit?

Submissions should be mailed to ailf12345submission@gmail.com in MS Word .doc format, with the subject of the mail as “Submission of Blog for AILF”

Perks and Awards:

An e-certificate of publication would be awarded to all those authors whose articles are selected for publication. A certificate of appreciation will be given to authors who have a minimum of 3 entries published in All India Legal Forum. Top 3 reads for the month will get a shout-out on all our social media handles along with a certificate of appreciation.

OUR POLICY -:

No Unnecessary Delay. Just mail your piece to us and we will get back to you within 10-14 days regarding its eligibility for publication. We Guide You
If your Paper is not eligible for the publication, our team will give you feedback, explain you the loopholes and guide you for its publication. We at All India Legal Forum guide our authors about the use of legal databases like SCC Online, MANUPATRA, ZOTERO, etc. We also teach you the basics of researching and formatting.

Contact Details:

For general queries,
E-mail: ailf12345editorial@gmail.com

Important Links:

REGARDING MORE DETAILS KINDLY VISIT AILF WEBSITE
The website link is here: https://allindialegalforum.in/

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Legislegal is looking for a candidate with up to 2 years PQE in corporate commercial litigation and advisory.

Role includes:

Drafting, vetting of corporate commercial agreements
Drafting of cases specifically matters relating to companies act, IBC, Income Tax,GST. Court appearances in all lower courts.

Location

New Delhi

To apply:

Email at ishita@legislegal.net
arnab@legislegal.net

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

A metropolis Court on Tues adjourned hearing within the preceding bail applications filed by Shantanu Muluk and Bombay based mostly attorney, Nikita Jacob in manoeuver with the urban center Police FIR over the ‘toolkit’ created for organizing farmers protests. However, the Court went ahead to increase their interim protections.
Additional Sessions choose Dharmender amphibian genus granted the relief when the counsel showing from each the suspect persons same they required time to travel through the reply filed by the urban center Police before advancing arguments within the matter.
The choose detected the submission and directed the police to not take any powerful action against each suspect until March fifteen, once the court can any hear the matter.
Jacob, Muluk, and Ravi were set-aside for violations and different charges.
Additional Sessions decide Dharmender amphibian genus adjourned the matter when hearing each the preceding bail pleas at the same time. The matter can currently be detected on the fifteenth of march 2021. Advocate Vrinda Grover alongside Advocate Sarim Naved appeared on behalf of Shantanu Muluk whereas Senior Advocate Rebecca John appeared on behalf of Nikita Jacob.

Vrinda Grover and Rebecca John had each quested the Court to adjourn the matter when the metropolis Police had filed a comprehensive reply with careful and researched annexures that were provided to each applier party these days.

Both Shantanu and Nikita had filed preceding bails within the wake of ending of the transit preceding bail granted to them by the Bombay court on the sixteenth and seventeenth of February severally. Shantanu alongside Nikita Jacob has joined the probe on twenty-second February in respect of the toolkit FIR. Each was a gift before the Dwarka workplace of the metropolis Police’s Cyber Cell for the aim of interrogation within the matter.
While the court granted Shantanu Muluk transit preceding bail for an amount of ten days, Nikita Jacob was granted the protection for three weeks, permitting each to approach the competent court for seeking applicable relief. The metropolis Court had vided order dated twenty-fifth February 2021 granted interim protection from arrest to Shantanu Muluk until March nine.

Advocate Vrinda Grover for Muluk submitted before the Court that since he had been cooperating with the investigation and has been gift within the interrogation known as by the metropolis Police Cyber Cell, the Court ordered that no powerful step shall be taken against the suspect Muluk until the consequent date of hearing i.e. 9th March. On the opposite hand, the Court vide order dated ordinal March 2021 adjourned the hearing in Nikita Jacob’s preceding bail when Senior Advocate Rebecca John submitted before the Court that her interim protection granted by the court can expire on the tenth of March.

Therefore, taking into consideration John’s submissions and request of the extra lawyer asking time to file a close and comprehensive reply within the matter, the Court ordered that the preceding bail pleas of each suspect shall be detected on the ninth of March at the same time. In another development within the case, the Bombay court vide order dated third March 2021 granted ten days transit preceding bail to state-based mostly activist, Subham Kar Chaudhuri, member of the organization “Extinction Rebellion”, apprehending arrest within the toolkit FIR.

According to the applier Chandhuri, he had volunteered for the “Extinction Rebellion” organization and is presently its South Asia Liaison. Shantanu Muluk and Nitika Jacob even have links as being volunteers with the same organization. It had been happy by Chandhuri that Nikita Jacob, Shantanu Muluk, and Disha Ravi have allegedly conspired to form the web “toolkit” thereby denying any role to play in its creation. Disha Ravi, the primary suspect within the toolkit case, was granted bail by an equivalent decide when perceptive “considering scanty and incomplete proof on record, I don’t notice any palpable reason to deny bail.”
“In my thought-about opinion creation of a WhatsApp cluster or being editor of associate degree innocuous Toolkit isn’t associate degree offense. Further, since the link with the same toolkit or PJF is not objectionable, mere deletion of the WhatsApp chat to destroy the proof linking her with the toolkit and PJF additionally becomes purposeless.

Reported By: Komal Dhore

On Friday, Justice D. Y. Chandrachud said, “I’m tired of seeing cut-and paste orders from High Courts.”
For an order to be confirmed, there must be independent reasons given! 

There must be an independent mental application! 

The judge continued, “Cutting, copying, and pasting from the Tribunal’s judgement just adds to the number of pages but does not address the main problem of appeal!”

The UPSC’s SLP was being considered by the bench, which also included Justice M. R. Shah, in light of an Orissa High Court decision upholding the order of the CAT, Cuttack Bench on the question of whether the respondent could be refused a position in the IAS due to a disciplinary penalty levied in 2011.
The UPSC Rules under Article 320, not the DoPT guidelines, will hold sway in this case, and Justices Chandrachud and Shah set aside the HC order, restoring the plea before the HC.


“The High Court should not apply its mind independently!  Only the order of the Tribunal has been copied! “, Justice Chandrachud remarked.
By reconvening the Selection Committee meeting, the tribunal ordered the appellant-UPSC to reconsider the case of the respondent for promotion to the IAS.” 

If the respondent was considered worthy by the Review Selection Committee, the respondent was to receive consequential benefits.

The High Court, after being moved from the tribunal’s order, extracted the tribunal’s judgement and observed that “the tribunal has elaborately discussed the statute” and that “there is no jurisdictional error and no intervention is warranted,” the supreme court noted in its order.
The petitioner-UPSC had primarily argued before the HC that the Tribunal had exceeded its authority by granting relief to the claimant, and that it had miserably refused to recognise that the induction is not a promotion. 

The DOPT guidelines are not applicable in this case; they are only applicable in cases of promotion.

It was also said that the Tribunal had made a significant mistake by remanding the case back for reconsideration. 

It was argued that the applicant has no right to be elevated to I.A.S., and that he only has a right to be considered for I.A.S. induction. 

The petitioner’s attorney argued that the applicant has no right to be considered for induction into I.A. because of his misbehaviour.

By Aishwarya Daftari

The Supreme Court in one of its judgments held that the payments made by resident Indian end-users or distributors on import of ‘shrink-wrapped’ software cannot be considered as a royalty payment, leading to no withholding of tax obligations in India against such payments.

At several levels of judicial appeals, it has been held that the payments made for the import of shrink-wrapped software overseas can be assessable to tax as Royalty under the provisions of the I-T Act. Since the Indian distributors failed to meet the TDS obligations, they were held as ‘assessees at the default’ and were faced with certain heavy tax penalties. With the advent of this judgment, they can now file for refunds as well.

For 20 years, including the incessant appeals in February, the apex court heard nearly 80 appeals before it on the issue of ‘Royalty’ payment. Which included several big-shot corporations like Samsung Electronics, IBM India, Sonata Information Technology, etc. the contention raised by these corporations was that the use given to the Indian companies was limited to making a backup copy or of its redistribution. They were not granted the exclusive right to modify the shrink-wrapped software. In one of the judgments by an HC, the payment made to the overseas supplier could not be categorized as business income by overseas entities and hence there was not any tax withholding obligation. The Supreme Court, in this case, set aside the High Court judgment and held the otherwise. 

With this judgment, long-standing litigation on this particular issue was finally put to rest, and relief to Indian companies was provided who was pursued by the I-T department for the alleged withholding of income tax. The apex court also held that the appeals made before it could be categorized in a bunch of 4 sets of appeals. 

1. The first category involves the case where computer software is purchased directly by an end-user, a resident of India from a foreign, non-resident supplier or manufacturer.
2. The second category deals with cases where resident Indian companies act as distributors or resellers by purchasing software from foreign, non-resident suppliers or manufacturers and then reselling the same to resident Indian end-users.
3. The third category comprises cases where the distributor is a foreigner who, after buying the software from a foreigner resells the same to the Indian resident distributors or end-users. 
4. And the last category includes cases where the computer software is affixed onto the hardware and is sold as an integrated unit/equipment.

The case was adjudged by a 3-judge bench comprising of Justice R F Nariman, Justice Hemant Gupta, and Justice B.R. Gavai 

Reported By- TANUJ SHARMA

Karnataka High Court, on 31st July 2019 quoted that, It is the obligation of the municipal corporation to maintain roads’ In a landmark verdict court gave a tremendous relief to the citizens suffering from the bad roads in India’s IT Capital Bengaluru as well as the other parts of the State, the Karnataka High court asserted that the right to have reasonably good footpaths and roads is a fundamental right of the citizens under Article 21.
The court also asserted, “citizens can knock the doors of High Court to seek compensation from a civic authority for the loss or damages that caused by bad footpaths and roads. A Division Bench consisting of Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Mohammad Nawaz passed interim order while hearing of a PIL petition which was filed in 2015 by Vijayan Menon and three other persons belonging to Koramangala in Bengaluru, They complained regarding the absolute failure of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike to ensure proper condition of roads.
It is mentioned in section 58 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act 1976 that it is the statutory obligation of the municipal corporation to construct, repair, construct and maintain footpaths to ensure the good condition of roads, the Bench mentioned it gives a corresponding right to citizens to discharge the obligation on the part of city corporations.
The bench also cited Supreme Court judgments, that expanded the scope of the fundamental right to life and personal liberty of citizens, the Bench said if citizens incur injuries or any loss of life due to deteriorated condition of footpaths or roads, it leads to infringement of their fundamental right, court Declared the right to have good roads and footpath is a necessity to lead a dignified and meaningful life under Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty).
The Bombay high court ruled on Thursday that citizens have a fundamental right to enjoy good roads and footpaths. A division bench consisting of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Riyaz Chagla quoted the government’s plans for smart cities and mentioned this would be possible only when good streets are made available. Bombay High Court also gave rulings over the same issue on 12th April 2018. The court was hearing a suo motu PILsubmitted in July 2013 letter by Justice Gautam Patel. The bench observed that they are aware of the government’s endeavor or effort to make each city smart.
However, no city can be smart until or unless it has proper roads and footpaths in reasonably good condition. HC stressed that it was the state and civic bodies’ obligation to provide these necessities to citizens. It is the fundamental right of a citizen, to have roads and footpaths in reasonably good condition. All necessary steps should be taken to ensure that the citizens are not getting deprived of their rights. Bombay High Court also mentioned that it is also the authorities’ responsibility to ensure the grievances of violation of this right were redressed promptly within a specified period and communicated to citizens. Court also directed the Maharashtra government to establish a centralized grievance redressal mechanism and frame policies to ensure that the quality of road constructed is good.
The court made the authorities remember that if citizens do suffer harm due to any failure of authorities in maintaining roads in appropriate condition, then they can seek compensation. The judges gave reference to the death of Dr. Deepak Amrapurkar occurred in September 2017 after he falls into an open manhole. They further added that all the necessary precautions must be taken to make sure that such an unfortunate incident of a citizen falling into an open manhole should not recur.
The municipal corporation must take all the possible steps to ensure that no open manhole is unattended. If it is left open, then necessary precaution and warning signs shall be implanted near it, and judges also stated that If a citizen suffers the consequences of the failure of the state machinery to maintain roads, apart from liability under the regular law of torts, the person can take recourse to public law remedy.He/she can initiate action under public law to seek compensation from the authorities.

Reported By- Anjali

Delhi government further standing counsel Sanjoy Ghose in response to a petition filed by Ali Sher, the daddy of Azad United Nations agency had sought-after compensation of Rs five large integer for the death of his son, Tihar jail authority submitted a standing report back to the Old Delhi high court. 

The Old Delhi judicature has been wise by the Tihar Jail authorities that the jail employees on duty detected noises and saw 3 under-trial prisoner’s offensive Dilsher Azad, United Nations agency died within the jail on Gregorian calendar month thirty last year.

The submissions were created in an exceedingly standing report filed by the Tihar Jail authorities through Old Delhi government further standing counsel Sanjoy Ghose in response to a petition filed by Ali Sher, the daddy of Azad United Nations agency had sought-after compensation of Rs five large integer for the death of his son.

“On 30.11.2020, the morning opposition was done at 6:45 AM. The Jail employees on duty detected noises from Ward No. 9. forthwith, the on-duty Jail employees rush to the spot and saw that deceased Dilsher was grappled by another beneath trial unfortunate Ved Prakash and he was being attacked by 2 different beneath trial prisoners specifically Naushad and Faizal Alam with the oversewn temporary sharp-edged object,”

The Tihar Jail authorities were the same in its standing report.

The report additional explicit that upon seeing the Jail employees’ members at the spot, the defendant persons started inflicting self-injuries and conjointly giving injuries to every different.

“Immediately by the intervention of this Jail employees, the defendant persons were controlled and therefore the sharp object employed in offensive Dilsher was recovered. Dilsher was forthwith rush to the Jail hospital wherever he has declared brought dead at 07:25 AM by the medical man on duty,” 

-it said.

When the matter came up for hearing before a single-judge bench of the judicature presided by Justice Prathiba M. Singh, the bench took note of the standing report and directed the Old Delhi government to submit the CCTV footage of the same incident.

The court whereas slating the matter for an additional hearing on March twenty-two, conjointly asked the govt. to state whether or not any action has been taken against the officers of the jail for the protection lapse resulting in the same incident.

The plea filed by Ali Sher sought-after the court’s direction to the Tihar Jail authorities and Old Delhi government to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. five crores on account of the tutelary death of his son Dilsher Azad as under trial unfortunate in Tihar Jail No. 03, Ward No. 09, on Gregorian calendar month thirty last year.

“…on 30-11-2020 petitioner received a decision from police officers informing him concerning the overtime of his son Dilsher Azad in Jail, on receipt of that data, petitioner forthwith reached Tihar Jail to determine the knowledge thus received wherever Tihar Jail authorities failed to co-operate with the petitioner the least bit and created him wait outside for hours along,” the plea same.

The plea additional claimed it was native police of police office Hari Nagar United Nations agency wise the petitioner that his son Dilsher Azad has died within Ward No. nine of Jail No. three of Tihar Jail.

“Despite continual requests, petitioner wasn’t being told the important reason for the death of his son. The petitioner may barely gather his senses and known as his advocate to Tihar Jail and solely when his arrival, the petitioner may return to grasp that his son has been dead within Tihar Jail which too with knives once indeed jail authorities claim to own a foolproof security system at place,” 

-the plea browses.

The plea filed through Advocate Anwar A. Khan additional states that he was unbroken in dark for a substantial amount of his time regarding the facts of the case and therefore the circumstances resulting in the death of his son United Nations agency was AN under-trial unfortunate in Tihar Jail.

It additionally claimed that when the death of his son, the total way forward for the petitioner and his better half and different relations has been shattered.

Reported By- Komal Dhore

About E-Justice India:

E-Justice India is India’s Leading Online legal Portal Managed by CSM Partners and Associates LLP (AAS-5840).  It is dedicated to Law students, Lawyers & Attorneys. It’s aim is to provide Education in Indian Legal Sector. Through this Portal, we set-up towards Right to Education. E-Justice India Provides cheapest certificate courses in India. Our Portal provides Legal News, Law Articles, Leading Case Summary, Law Notes, Certificate Courses, Free Legal Advise, Success Stories of Advocates, Interview of Advocates & Judges and Information about Upcoming Law Events.

ABOUT THE INTERNSHIP:

• ejusticeindia.com is looking for undergraduate law students as legal interns for the month of March-April, 2021.
• Interns are expected to have strong writing, Research and analytical skills along with basic knowledge of MS – Word.
• Interns with prior experience of legal writing will be given preference.
• The duration of internship would be four weeks which can be extended based on the interest and performance of the interns.

IMPORTANT GUIDELINES

• You may update your position to ‘Intern at E-Justice India’ on your social media accounts.
• ejusticeindia.com is active on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram. Please like and follow.

Deadlines: – 

There will be reasonable deadlines given to the interns for their work. Interns are expected to adhere to those deadlines. Each interns’ performance will be tracked on an individual basis. ejusticeindia.com reserves the right to terminate the internship based on the non-fulfillment of the deadlines. If the internship is so terminated, the candidate will not be provided with the certificate and other perks You’ll be in touch with the Internship Coordinators through Mail or Whatsapp Group. All the
reporting and dissemination of information will take place through the Mail.

Last Date to Apply : 

13 March

Duration : 

15 March to 14 April, 2021

Interns will selected on the basis of their C.V

Application Procedure:

Application Link:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf66QkNIYKv3zSVMaWdWvJsDZwrUPNDDsafS3aXyalOd313nw/viewform

For any other queries, feel free to write to us at admin@ejusticeindia.com

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About MyLawman:

MyLawman is one of the fastest-growing Legal Community websites for Legal Resource sharing and an e-learning platform for law students, legal professionals, and legal academia. As a one-stop solution, MyLawman caters to the differential needs of Law students and professionals across different divisions viz. legal blogs, opportunities, journal, judiciary preparation, and e-learning content including online courses. MyLawman is a growing family of around 2500+ law students as volunteers/ interns and campus ambassadors along with hundreds of law faculties on board. MyLawman partners with Law Schools, Law Firms, Domain Experts (resource persons), and NGOs working in the field of Law to build and disseminate legal knowledge to learners/legal fraternity.

Click Here to fill the form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqIHC5qTC4AnudB9OkGraaYFifP_PGJev673qML66jcARwxA/viewform?usp=send_form

About ARIL by MyLawman:

Advance Research in Law (ARIL) has been rolled out by the Research and Innovation Division (rID) of MyLawman and would be extensively dedicated to students and professionals in the field of Law. We aim to create awareness and enable active student engagement with the dynamic field of Law. It encompasses a wide range of activities that include research, writing, teaching, development of digital resources, and organizing high-quality public educational events.

About the Opportunity

We are looking for a Research Assistant to join ARIL. Initially, this position shall be for a period of 4 months only. The Research Assistant will be engaged in the following tasks:

• Research, writing, and producing a wide range of content related to contemporary issues and the latest developments in Law.
• In-depth research and developing content related but not limited to International Trade Law, AI-Blockchain & Law, Conventional and Non-Conventional IP Law, Privacy and Data Protection Law, Internet Law, Law of Arbitration, Media Policy-Regulations, Drone Law and other contemporary developing areas of Law.
• Assist with public outreach programs.
• Other related tasks.

Eligibility and Must-Have:

• Law students, UG (not below 3rd year), PG (LLM and ors.), Research Scholars, and early career professionals keenly interested in research.
• Seemless internet connectivity.
• Excellent grammar.
• Having command over pen! 
• Able to devote 2-3 hours of your time on a regular basis.

Stipend: 

No stipend shall be provided. This post is voluntary and honorary in nature. In case of outstanding performance, certain paid projects/researches may be awarded to compensate.

Deadline- 

Apply by March 20, 2021

Application Procedure:

• Interested candidates are required to fill the form (Click Here to fill the form). While filling the form keep a passport size photo, resume, and a writing sample ready to upload on the given space in the form.
• After the initial scrutiny, the selected candidates will be contacted by the Research and Innovation Division.

Contact Details

Mr. Harshit Kiran
harshit@mylawman.co.in
+91 9472434013
To Know More, Visit- www.mylawman.co.in

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Organization Name:

Legasis Services Private Limited

Job title:

Compliance Associate

Experience required:

1-3 years

Academic qualification:

CS/LLB

Location:

Mumbai

Skills required:

• Knowledge and experience in Statutory & Legal Compliances
• Compliance Audit/Review
• Ability to co-ordinate with external & internal teams
• Project Management
• Client handling skills

How to Apply?

If you are interested please send you CV to sumit.p@legasis.in

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/