About the NLUJ

National Law University-Jodhpur (NLU Jodhpur) is one of India’s leading Law Schools situated in
the vibrant and colorful city of Jodhpur, Rajasthan. NLU Jodhpur has constantly been ranked as
one of the top law schools in India.

Since its establishment in 1999, NLU Jodhpur has endeavoured to produce exceptional lawyers and legal scholars aimed at pushing and challenging the existing boundaries of knowledge.

About the Journal-JIPS

The Journal of Intellectual Property Studies is a bi-annual, student-run academic journal published
by National Law University, Jodhpur. The Journal was established in 2016 and primarily deals with
contemporary developments in the field of intellectual property and related laws.

There are very few journals in India discussing at length topical issues in the field of intellectual property rights and hence, the journal’s objective is to fill this void by becoming a platform where ideas can be exchanged and in turn hopes to enhance discourse on intellectual property rights between policymakers, practitioners and scholars.

To achieve this, the journal solicits articles from a diverse pool of authors comprising of scholars, practitioners, and students.

Call for Papers

The Board of Editors of the Journal of Intellectual Property Studies [JIPS], is pleased to invite original, unpublished manuscripts for publication in the Summer 2022 Issue of the Journal (Volume V, Issue II) in the form of notes and articles.

Theme

The manuscripts must pertain to the field of intellectual property law or related fields such as media
and technology law.

Submission Guidelines

General Guidelines

  • Manuscripts must conform to the scope and theme of the Journal of Intellectual Property Studies (‘the Journal’). The Journal is dedicated to publishing nationally and internationally relevant content relating to law and policy in intellectual property rights. This includes overlapping areas such as competition laws and technology laws. All submissions must primarily deal with these subject areas.
  • All submitted manuscripts shall be original. Any form of plagiarism would lead to immediate rejection of the submission.
  • Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously. Once a manuscript has been selected for publication or has been published in the Journal, the author(s) must seek permission from the Editorial Board before publishing it elsewhere. Such permission may or may not be granted at the discretion of the Editorial Board.
  • The author(s) must inform the Editorial Board if the manuscript has also been submitted to another journal, website or forum. The Editorial Board must be notified immediately if an offer for publication from another journal, website or forum is accepted by the author(s).
  • Solicited submissions are guaranteed a right of publication in the Journal subject to quality and content review by the Editorial Board.
  • In relation to all disputes, the decision of the Editor-in-Chief shall be final.
  • All correspondence must be via e-mail, and should be addressed to the Managing Editor at jips@nlujodhpur.ac.in. Authors are requested to e-mail the Board only in exceptional circumstances, as the Board will keep them informed throughout the review process. 

Specific Guidelines

Author(s)

  • Each manuscript may have up to two authors.
  • In case of joint authorship, the author from whom a submission is solicited by the Editorial Board shall intimate the Board of the name, credentials and contact details of the intended co-author.

Citations and References

  • All relevant sources shall be duly acknowledged as footnotes.
  • The text and citation styles shall conform to the rules prescribed in The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (20th edition). 

Manuscripts

  • The body of the manuscripts shall not contain or disclose any information pertaining to the author’s name, affiliation or credentials.
  • The Journal accepts the following kinds of submissions:
    • Articles: Must extensively and holistically discuss the subject-matter (4000 up to 10,000 words). Articles must be accompanied by an abstract of 250-300 words.
    • Case Comment: Critical analysis of significant case laws (up to 5,000 words). Case comments must be accompanied by an abstract of 150-200 words
    • Legislative Comment: Comprehensive analysis of recent legislative developments (1000- 3000 words). Legislative comments must be accompanied by an abstract of 150-200 words.

While authors are required to adhere to the prescribed word limits, departures from the same will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

How to Submit?

  • The Journal accepts submissions on a rolling basis. Issues are published bi-annually in January and July respectively.
  • Submissions must be made in Word Format (.doc)/(.docx) by filling the Google Form through the link- https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfOYPzcHl_az0ajEYM0gAPil3D2cKvwXLVbOl_XZHw_qBN9Ag/viewform
  • All manuscripts must necessarily be accompanied by an abstract of 250-300 words for articles and 150-200 words for case or legislative comments explaining the main idea, the objective of the article/ case comment and the conclusions drawn from it. Submissions made without an abstract shall be outrightly rejected.
  • No requests for expedited reviews shall be entertained by the Journal save in exceptional circumstances. Authors may send an e-mail to the Board at jips@nlujodhpur.ac.in requesting an expedited review mentioning the reason for the same. The Board shall intimate the author if the expedited review will be possible.

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2022

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

The Supreme Court of India emphasized in Satish Chandra Verma vs. Union of India that the freedom to go abroad, like marriage and family, is a genuine and vital human right. “The right to travel abroad is an important basic human right because it fosters an individual’s independent and self-determining creative character,” wrote a bench led by Justices L. Nageswara Rao and M.R. Shah, “not only by expanding his freedoms of action but also by expanding his scope of experience.

In this case, an IPS officer filed an appeal, from Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. He claimed in his appeal that he was the subject of a departmental inquiry and that the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) had denied him permission to visit relatives overseas because of it. Despite the fact that Inspector General of Police Satish Chandra Verma was not facing any criminal charges, the Madras High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s decision that he may not go abroad without first obtaining Vigilance clearance. The Supreme Court overruled the verdict of the High Court, citing Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Kent vs. Dulles, two landmark US Supreme Court cases (1958).

In its judgment in Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India, the bench stated that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental human right since it strengthens an individual’s independent and self-determining creative character by widening his job experience and giving him more freedom of action. The Supreme Court noted the ruling in the latter case, which stated that “freedom to go abroad is a fundamental human right with major societal relevance.” The Supreme Court said that the freedom to travel globally is a core human right that also relates to private life, such as marriage, family, and friendship.

Right to travel internationally

Article 19 of the Indian constitution guarantees the freedom to freely move beyond Indian territory; nevertheless, the right to go abroad is derived from Article 21’s right to life and personal liberty.

Liberal interpretations have given the phrase “life and liberty” huge meanings in this article. Life here refers to both one’s physical existence and one’s quality of life. Personal liberty, on the other hand, encompasses a wide variety of rights in addition to freedom from physical constraint or confinement.

The Supreme Court stated in Maneka Gandhi v. UOI that the term “personal liberty” as used in Article 21 has a very broad meaning and it encompasses a plethora of rights that include man’s personal liberty, some of which have been elevated to the status of separate fundamental rights and given additional protection under Article 19.

Article 21 defines the state’s negative duty, although it does not totally nullify restrictions or limitations if carried out in line with the “process” prescribed by law. An individual’s personal liberty and the rights that come with it, as well as the individual’s duties and obligations to the state and other citizens, must be balanced. Satwant Singh Sawhney v. D. Ramarathnam: The Supreme Court ruled in Satwant Singh Sawhney v. D. Ramarathnam that the “expression” of personal liberty includes freedom of movement and travel internationally. The necessity to hold a passport in order to
legitimately going overseas may raise the question of whether it is a barrier to an individual’s right to travel abroad, however, the Supreme Court found against this in the same case.

In a nutshell, the right to freely travel throughout India’s territory and the right to freely travel abroad both fall under the umbrella of “personal liberty,” although being provided under separate parts of the constitution. Specific limits on traveling overseas may apply, which must be followed in compliance with legal regulations. There are several fair restrictions on roaming freely throughout India.

Article 12 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights addresses the freedom to travel abroad in international law. It empowers anybody, including themselves, to exit any country. As a result, it enhances the basic freedom of foreign travel. However, the Covenant, like the Indian Constitution, places limitations on the right “as may be needed by law to protect national security, public order, health, or morality in the interests of others’ rights and freedoms,” and these restrictions are compatible with the Covenant’s other rights.

The United Nations Human Rights Committee, which oversees the Covenant’s implementation, has underlined that Article 12 covers both the freedom to leave for permanent emigration and the right to travel abroad. It also safeguards a person’s freedom to pick his or her own travel destination.

While the UN Human Rights Council asserts that the right to dwell in a country includes the right to get the necessary travel documents, the Supreme Court has a different view on the passport and travel document problem. In Satwant Singh Sawhney v. D. Ramarathnam, the Supreme Court argued that a passport is a political document with no absolute right to get one because it is up to the state to give or deny one. The government does not appear to need to assert someone it does not think acceptable because the document states the holder’s respectability.

When there is a dispute between national and international law, the Supreme Court stated in Gramophone Company of India vs. Virendra Pandey in 1984 that national law shall prevail.

The right to travel freely across the world has been recognized by the Supreme Court as a fundamental right. Following Article 21, it is suggested that a new article, namely Article 21A, be included with the words “A21. (2) Nothing in section (1) stops the State from implementing legislation that sets appropriate boundaries in the interests of India’s sovereignty and integrity, friendly relations with other states, and the general public.” An individual provision for the right to travel abroad might help to accelerate the implementation of this critical right, which is now underway.

Written by Muskan Patidar student at Kirit P. Mehta School of law (NMIMS), Mumbai.

ABSTRACT

The article makes a sincere effort to capture the journey and improvements made under the Motor Vehicles Act which was first enacted on 1st July 1988 and thereupon amended in 2019 by the act of parliament.

INTRODUCTION

Transportation acts as a vital pillar of the social infrastructural development of any country. In a developing country like India, cheap and efficient means of transportation boosts connectivity. Connectivity aids uniform and cost-effective distribution of goods and services thereby spurring economical development. In such a state of affairs, the development of a robust grid of transportation networks assumes a center space. In the Indian sub context, road transportation is the most sort after category for commercial and personal transportation.

Hence, the need for the development of road transportation was felt hard, keeping in mind the benefits of connectivity. The compelling push for the development of road transport infrastructure combined with the increasing gross income of average middle-class Indian due to economic prosperity led to drastic demand for motor vehicles ranging from commercial ones such as trucks, lorry, etc. to personal ones such as cars, bikes, etc. The effect of this fundamental shift led to the dotting of the national roads with an increased number of motor vehicles culminating in congestion of roads, increased no of road accidents, vehicular crimes, noise pollution, instances of careless and rash driving, etc. all indicating acute need for due and systematic regulation of road traffic.

LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORKS

A. The Motor Vehicles Act 1988
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 1 is comprehensive legislation that caters to the needs of providing an effective framework for management and regulation of the vehicular road traffic, minimization of road accidents, and enhancement of road safety. The act was enacted by the parliament and came into force on 1 st July 1989. It replaced Motor Vehicles Act,1939, which earlier replaced the first such enactment Motor Vehicles Act,1914. The Act laid down the detailed provisions relating to the motor vehicles laws and chalked out efficiently even the minutest details such as eligibility, requirements, suspension and disqualification of driving license and learners license, registration of vehicles, permits, insurance, claim tribunals, traffic rules, appeals, compensation, etc. Furthermore, the act provides a vast array of penalties for the violation of traffic rules.

Key Features
1. Object

  • The main object of the act was to take care of the increasing number of both commercial vehicles and personal vehicles in the country.
  • It sought to encourage the adoption of high-end technology in the automotive sector so as to provide for greater connectivity at affordable prices.
  • To lay down road safety standards, pollution control measures, and standards for the transportation of hazardous and explosive materials.
  • To lay down procedure and policy so as to liberalize the entry and operation of the private sector in the road transport field which was earlier dominated by the presence and participation of the government sector.
  • To lay down parameters and standards for the manufacture and use of motor vehicles parts so as to curb vehicular emissions and protect the environment.
  • To provide a mechanism for registration and licensing of newer types of personal and commercial vehicles.
  • To chalk out an effective mechanism for tracking down traffic offenders.
  • To entail greater flow of passengers and freight with the least impediments so as to address the concerns of transportation dysconnectivity and isolation which led to the creation of regional or local imbalances, thereby leading to economic dysfunction.
  • To protect consumers’ interest in the Transport Sector and provide a speedy remedy for adjudication of consumer disputes who had to previously go for the long-drawn procedures of the civil suits as is required under Fatal Accidents Act, 1855.
  • To provide for the establishment of claims tribunals for adjudication of compensation to be given to the victims of accidents involving motor vehicles and insurance of the vehicles.

2. The centerpiece of this act was the formation of a comprehensive adjudication mechanism for grant of compensation to the victims of road accidents, as earlier, due to the lacunae of previous legislations, the drivers could escape their negligence and were not held accountable for their actions. The MV Act 1988 provided a vent for the speedy redressal of the above disputes and added to the cause of innocent victims.

3. Section 3 of the Motor Vehicle Act made it mandatory for a driver of the motor vehicle to have a valid driver’s license i.e. DL for driving at any public place which shall be issued to him by the authorizing officer. A DL or learner’s license is valid and effective throughout India.
Furthermore, no vehicle can be driven without obtaining a valid registration certificate under the motor vehicles act. The registration certificate so issued shall be valid from the date of issuing to the next fifteen years which can be further renewed for five more years.

4. Section 4 of the MV Act prescribes the age criteria for driving motor vehicles as per which people under the age of eighteen years and people under the age of twenty years shall not drive a motor vehicle and transport vehicle respectively in any public place. However, a person aged 16 years or more may drive a motor vehicle in a public place with an engine capacity of less than 50cc.

5. Section 6 prescribes restrictions for holding of more than 2 DLs except in the case of learners license or holding of central government vehicle license or others if any, as prescribed by law.

6. Section 8 enumerates the conditions for granting learners licenses. Learners so granted shall be effective for a period of six months from the date of its issuance.

7. Section 9 deals with the grant of a driving license. A DL granted under Section 9 shall be valid for a period of 20 years or until the age of 40 years of the applicant; whichever is earlier and in case of transport vehicle, the DL shall be effective for a period of 3 years. Section 15 is regarding the renewal of driving licenses.

8. Section 19 enumerates about disqualification or revocation of DL by licensing authority after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the holder of DL.

9. Section 26 provides for maintenance of a State Register of Driving Licenses, in respect of driving licenses issued and renewed by the licensing authorities of the State Government.

10. Section 146 of the Act makes it mandatory to insure motor vehicles.

11. The Motor Vehicle Act 1988 covers various offenses for the contravention of the rules mentioned therein and lays down penalties for the violation of the same such as Section 39 provides a penalty for not having a valid registration certificate of the vehicle, Section 129 for riding without a helmet, Section 184 for over-speeding and doing rash driving, Section 138(3) for driving the vehicle without fastening seat belt and many more.

B. The Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019-
With ever-growing modernization and globalization, a significant pattern of change in the behavioral use of vehicles became evident in 21 st century especially after the year 2010. Instances of reckless and rash driving, violation of traffic rules such as nonuse of helmets, seat belts, use of unregistered vehicles and permits, etc. became rampant and common. The paltry and meager amount of penalties prescribed under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 for the violation of rules mentioned therein fell acutely short to deter those violations and further perpetuated the careless and reckless attitude of the people. It was in this background that the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act2 was enacted and passed by the parliament on 31 st July August 2019. The Act has been in force since 1 st September 2019 and seeks to amend some of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988. It aims to make the roads safer and bolster the regulations in order to deter violations of the traffic norms. The act provides for a manifold increase of penalties for the violation of traffic rules, recall of defective vehicles, provisions for the protection of good Samaritans, the constitution of National Road Safety Boards, and a host of other reforms.

Key Features:
1. Compensation for victims of road accidents:
In the context of hit and run cases, the act has significantly increased the fixed minimum amount of compensation to be given in cases of deaths from Rs 25,000 to Rs 2 Lakh, and in cases of grievous injury, from Rs 12,500 to Rs 50,000.

2. Recall of vehicles:
The Act provides for recalling of those defected motor vehicles by the central government which may cause harm to the environment, or to the common people in general.

3. Creation of Road Safety Boards:
The amended Act prescribes the establishment of National Road Safety Boards which will be created by the central government in order to advise the central and state governments on all aspects of road safety and traffic management.

4. Increment in the quantum of fines 3
i. The amended Act has increased the fine for drinking and driving 5 times the penalty prescribed under the older Act from Rs 2,000 to Rs 10,000 along with imprisonment of 6 months. Consequent repetition of drinking and driving would lead to a fine of Rs. 15,000.
ii. Fine for rash driving is now increased from Rs 1000 to Rs. 5000 under the amended act.
iii. There has been a colossal increase of 10 times in the fine for driving without DL which now stands fixed at Rs 5000 in contrast to the earlier chargeable amount of Rs.500.
iv. The amended act introduced a new category of offenses by the Juveniles as per which the Guardian of the Juvenile, who would be the owner of the vehicle will now be fined Rs. 25,000 and up to Rs 3 years of imprisonment for contravention of traffic rules by the Juvenile and the Juvenile shall be tried accordingly under the Juveniles Justice Act. Furthermore, in such cases of contravention and conviction of the juveniles, registration of Motor Vehicles shall be canceled.
v. The amended Motor Vehicles Act lays down standards for the manufacture of motor vehicles parts, the contravention of which would result in a fine of up to Rs 100 crore, or imprisonment of up to one year, or both to the manufacturers of such motor parts.
vi. Section 196 of the amended Motor Vehicle Act, 2019 prescribes a fine of Rs 2000 for driving the vehicle without Insurance.
vii. Section 194 D of the amended Act prescribes a fine of Rs 1000 for riding without helmets and disqualification of license for up to 3 months.
vii. Driving without a seat belt will now be fined at Rs. 1000 under section 194B of the amended Act.
ix. Fine for speeding/racing has now been increased from Rs 500 to Rs 500.
x. Fine for driving vehicles without a permit has been increased from Rs.5000 to Rs. 10000 and fine for over-speeding have been increased from Rs 400 to Rs 2000.
xi. Under section 194 E of the Act; not providing a way for emergency vehicles e.g. ambulances will now cost up to Rs 10,000.

CONCLUSION

The Motor Vehicles Act 1988 was enacted with the objective of improving road traffic management and safety; enhancing the regulatory mechanism of licensing and registration, and minimizing road accidents. However, the compelling forces of modernization of 21 st century made many provisions of this act inconsistent and obsolete with the pace of development of current times, thereby leading to a lack of deterrence and perpetuation of irrational and reckless behavior as regards traffic etiquettes. This led to the enactment of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 that sought to take care of the lacunae created due to the inconsistency of the previous Act by systematic consolidation and amendment of the previous Act, thereby prescribing a host of rigorous punitive and improvising measures.

References:

  1. https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1988-59.pdf
  2. https://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210413.pdf
  3. https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-motor-vehicles-amendment-bill-2019

Written by Riya Ganguly student at Bharati Vidyapeeth New Law College, Pune.

Introduction

India, a country with many ideologies, religions, dialects, castes, and topography, represents unity and integrity. However, when it comes to the Varna System, which divides Indians into Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras, there is no such unity displayed (Scheduled Casts, Scheduled Tribe, and Other Backward Communities, the most oppressed ones). As a result, the founders of the Indian Constitution established the principle of the reservation to ensure that every citizen’s social, political, educational, and economic rights and dignity be protected equally.

Current Position

In India, the caste system is profoundly founded in certain theological and social views that are highly conservative, and it has eventually estranged countrymen while categorizing ethnic and minority groups. This socioeconomic marginalization stems from the nebulous and nonsensical Principle of Purity and Pollution, which states that the lower castes are mostly linked with harmful vocations and are hence stigmatized by the society’s mainstream population. The Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes now make up more than half of the country’s population (OBC). Since the dawn of time, the Indian civilization has recognized significant social, educational, and economic disparities among its citizens. Though there was no caste-based divide in Vedic civilization, the rise of Brahminical culture in the Indian subcontinent brought with it the active form of class and caste structure.

The Constitutional provision of reservation

Article 14
Article 14 emphasizes two points: equality before the law and equal protection under the law. Article 14 imposes a duty on the state for the benefit of all people living in India’s territory. As a result, residents are not the only ones who gain from Article 14. Every natural or artificial person, whether a citizen or an immigrant, is entitled to the protections afforded by this article. The reality, on the other hand, frequently paints a different picture.

Article 15(4)
“Nothing in this article or clause (2) of Article 29 shall prevent the state from making any provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizen or the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribe.” Such “special provision” as are permissible under clause (4) of Article 15 must, However, those specific provisions are for the progress of persons who fall into those categories, and thus they are not for the advancement of those who are not covered by this clause. Even clause (4) of Articles 15 and 16 cannot be applied to all the vague purposes of the reservation. In the State of M.P v Mohan Singh the Supreme Court verdict that though prisoners were from the backward class they will be equally liable for punishment as of other prisoners as they have broken the law.

Article 16(4B)
“Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from considering any unfilled vacancies of the year which is reserved for being filled up in that year following any provision for reservation made under clause (4) or clause (4A) as a separate class of vacancies to be filled up in any succeeding year or years and such class of vacancies shall not be considered
together with the vacancies of the year in which they are being filled up for determining the ceiling of fifty percent reservation on the total number of vacancies of that year”.

The 50% Rule
In Indra Sawhney vs Union Of India, 1992, the court covered caste-based reservation, ruling that “No reservation or preference provision may be sought with such eagerness as to demolish the fundamental notion of equality.” The Janata Party administration established the Second Backward Groups Commission, or Mandal Commission, in 1979 to identify India’s socially and educationally backward classes. Its chairman is Bihar MP Bindheshwar Mandal. At the time, India had established reservations for Dalits and Adivasis. The Mandal Commission’s report, published in 1980, proposed that quotas be provided to the Other Backward Classes, a large group of castes that fundamentally fulfill the caste system’s “shudra” label. The report was kept in cold storage after Congress regained power shortly after it was filed. Another non-Congress administration, this time led by VP Singh, took a decade to implement the Mandal Commission’s recommendations, sparking widespread protests and the Indra Sawhney case in the Supreme Court.

The concept of ‘Creamy Layer’:
The Supreme Court of India gave birth to the concept of a “Creamy Layer” because the Indian Constitution does not provide for it. It generally refers to that backward caste be it SC, ST, OBC, or even any unreserved one who may be regarded as untouchables or not got enough land, money to live a healthy life and their children will not be able to get the reservation. For the first time, the term creamy layer got introduced by the Sattanathan Commission in 1971 which reported that the “creamy layer” should be exempted from the OBC reservation of civil services, and with that, the “creamy layer” principle has been laid down by Supreme Court for the exclusion of the advanced sections of the backward class groups for reservation. However, it ultimately divided society into backward and forward classes.

Concluding Remarks & Suggestions:

The constitution’s framers aspired to create a casteless and classless society. They wanted to uplift the underprivileged and provide them with a decent existence by concentrating on their job, education, and social standing. In a nutshell, the principle of the reserve was ingrained in the foundations of Equity and Justice. However, over time, the whole thing went off the rails. As a result of evaluating different aspects of the government’s reserve policy covered under Articles 15 and 16, certain flaws in reservation policies have been identified. The authors’ humble proposals for eliminating such shortcomings and achieving the desired aims of reservation policy is as follows:

Despite the government’s haste in implementing the 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections in the unreserved category, it is past time for it to rethink its strategy on defining poverty levels and ensure that all poor and needy individuals are included.

Above all, the authors argue that it is past time to focus on the fundamental difficulty that the Reservation Laws face, which is nothing more than a defective system for implementing or enforcing the laws or policies that have been enacted. The true beneficiary is poor in information, which is a major worry right now.

Written by Hemant Bohra student at School of Law, Lovely Professional University, Punjab.

About J&G ASSOCIATES

The legal profession is changing rapidly in light of market disruption, changing client expectations and technological developments. At the same time, new sectors and avenues such as Technology, Healthcare, Maritime, E-Commerce and Data Protection have attained significance.

Keeping in mind, the changing dynamics of the legal market, we at J&G are focusing on advisory, regulations and dispute resolution in Healthcare, Banking, Real Estate, Maritime, White Collar Crimes and E-Commerce Sectors.

The firm is headquartered at Jaipur, Rajasthan and is being headed by its founding partners Aditya Jain (Advocate on Record, SC) and Neha Gyamlani, Advocate.

Location

Jaipur (Physical)/New Delhi (Part-Time)

Number of Vacancies

Two (2)

Eligibility

  • Must have a Law Degree
  • 0-2 years of experience

How to Apply?

Send your CV to jandgadvocates@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About NHRC

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India is a Statutory public body constituted on 12 October 1993 under the Protection of Human Rights Ordinance of September 28, 1993. It was given a statutory basis by the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (PHRA).

The NHRC is the National Human Rights Commission of India, responsible for the protection and promotion of human rights, defined by the Act as “Rights Relating To Life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and enforceable by courts in India.

About the Job Opportunity

The National Human Rights Commission intends to prepare a panel for engagement of “Senior Research Consultants(SRCS), Research Consultants(RCS) and Junior Research Consultants(JRCS)” on short term contract basis, who have knowledge and aptitude for research and practical experience in dealing with human rights issues.

The work shall include research, analysis of data and other material, preparation of reports/status papers, notes, briefs, minutes preparation, seminars and workshops, follow up actions, modules for training and any other related work in respect of assigned subjects

Positions Available

  • Senior Research Consultants (SRCs)
  • Research Consultants (RCs)
  • Junior Research Consultants (JRCs)

Eligibility

Senior Research Consultants (SRCs)

  • Educational Background: Ph.D in Social Science preferably in Political Science, International relations, Social work, human rights etc. from any recognized University, with minimum 60% marks.
  • Age limit: Maximum 56 years of age as on the last date of receipt of application
  • Experience: 15 years Research Experience in any of the subjects given above from a Recognized Institution or University.
  • Remuneration: Rs. 1,00,000/- per month without any dearness or other allowances

Research Consultants (RCs)

  • Educational Background: LLB or Post-graduate in Social Science preferably in Political Science, International relations, Social work, human rights etc. from any recognized University with minimum 70% marks
  • Experience: 10 years Research Experience in any of the subjects given above from a Recognized Institution or University.
  • Age limit: Maximum 45 years of age as on the last date of receipt of application
  • Remuneration: Rs. 75,000/- per month without any dearness or other allowances

Junior Research Consultants (JRCs)

  • Educational Background: LLB or Post-graduate in Social Science preferably in Political Science, International relations, Social work, human rights etc. from any recognized University.
  • Age limit: Maximum 30 years of age as on the last date of receipt of application
  • Remuneration: Rs. 60,000/- per month without any dearness or other allowances

How to Apply?

Eligible and interested candidates may send their application in the enclosed prescribed proforma (As given in the official advertisement) at Annexure-A,

  • by post or by hand to the Under Secretary (Estt.), National Human Rights Commission, Manav Adhikar Bhawan, ‘C’ Block, GPO Complex, New Delhi – 110023
  • and through e-mail at nhrcestt@nic.in,

within 30 days from the date of publication of the Advertisement in the newspaper. Applications received after the due date shall not be considered.

The applications shall include a copy of each of certificate showing date of birth and educational qualifications and one passport size photograph.

Wherever % age of marks obtained are shown in CGPA/SGPA/FGPA/CPI or any other method, documentary proof of norms adopted by the Institute/University convert the same to percentage needs to be submitted.

Selection

  • The selection shall be on the basis a personal interview of the eligible candidates by the Selection Committee.
  • Details of the short-listed candidates for the personal interview shall be displayed in the website of the Commission nhrc.nic.in subsequently.
  • In case number of candidates is higher, the Commission reserves the right to short list the candidates on the basis of marks obtained.
  • The short-listed candidates should bring attested copies of (1) Identity Card (PAN Card/ Aadhar Card/Election ID Card/DL etc.), (ii) certificate showing date of birth and educational qualifications and (iii) one passport size photograph while attending the interview In the event of selection, their engagement shall be subject to verification of all original documents.

Application Deadline

March 2, 2022

Link for more details

https://nhrc.nic.in/sites/default/files/vacancy_RSC_RC_JRC_feb2022.pdf

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About Advocate Shamshravish Rein

Avocate Shamshravish Rein is a Partner at Aeltemesh Rein & Co. Law Consultants (Advocate-On-Record Law firm). She got enrolled as an Advocate in 2008 at the age of 21 and is practicing in Indian Courts primarily in Supreme Court & High Courts since 2008.

Apart from private practice and vast experience in almost all the sectors of Law since 2008, she is Amicus Curiae in Supreme Court of India Commercial Mediator, certified by IICA, Ministry Of Corporate Affairs, India; she is Arbitrator on the Panel of International and Domestic Arbitration Center India (IDAC India)

She is the Youngest Member Executive (ever) (age 26 years) of Executive Committee of Supreme Court Bar Association, India (Dec 2013- Dec 2014).

About the Internship:

She is inviting Interns for a minimum period of 30 days.

Eligibility– Final year students only

Mode of Internship– Offline/Physical

Location:

New Delhi

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may Email CV with request letter on office.arclc@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About CELAR and Lex Terra

Since its inception, Lex Terra has published 38 issues on various debatable facets of the environment and environment-related analytical items. Several academicians, practitioners, and students have contributed to the webzine. Through Lex Terra, they endeavour to facilitate better and greater ideas to create a community of environmentally conscious individuals from the legal and non-legal fraternity.

Lex Terra is committed to free and open access to all academic research. No publication fees will be charged to authors at any stage of the review. In addition, no subscription costs will be charged to readers. Accepted manuscripts shall be published online and can be freely accessed through the official website of National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam.

About the Call for Submissions

Lex Terra is currently soliciting submissions for “Issue 39” onwards. Issue 39 is scheduled to be published tentatively in June 2022.

All manuscripts must be submitted only via this form: https://forms.gle/1YBH7e1QAUfSkMvf6. Manuscripts sent via email will not be considered.

Deadline: March 15, 2022

Brochure

Contact details

Mail at: celar@nluassam.ac.in

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organisation

The concept of ‘Symbiosis’ is nurtured by Prof. Dr. S. B. Mujumdar, Chancellor, Symbiosis International (Deemed University) on the principles of Vedic thought ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ which means ‘World as One Family’. Symbiosis Law School (SLS) Hyderabad was established in 2014 inheriting splendid novelty, dynamism and excellence in the education of Symbiosis International Deemed University, Pune.

About the Environmental Law Cell

Environmental Law Cell (ELC), one of the many cells/ centers of Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad was established with the motto of incorporating a sense of responsibility towards the environment among students and creating awareness to contribute in the prevention of future degradation of the environment. Through the Cell, the members educate the students in campus and people off campus about the need for environment conservation and Sustainable Development through various activities like plantation drive, awareness camps, national seminars, Quizs, jumble sale, competitions, etc. The Cell also takes the initiative to celebrate environmentally important days through awareness.

About the Event 

Due to the constraints caused by the global pandemic, it has been a difficult task to organise and attend events. Fortunately, technology has been on our side and online modes of certain events, such as Quizzes and webinars could be conducted. We have come up with this interesting and exciting event, the “National Quiz Competition” to create awareness about the theme of the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration and other significant issues related to the environment.

Theme

Following are the themes of the quiz:

1.Animal Protection in India

2. Sustainable Development Goals

The primary basis of the Quiz will be the laws, legislation, and government policies related to the themes mentioned below. The theme of the quiz will be entirely based on environment-related issues. 

*Rules of the Quiz shall be attached below*

About the Prize

The winner of this competition shall be awarded an internship with Sarthak Advocates and Solicitors.

They specialize in advising on commercial transactions and disputes across the different industry sectors. They have had the privilege of being invited by several Standing Committees of Parliament to depose as experts on a range of Bills, such as the Higher Education and Research Bill, 2011, National Academic Depositories Bill, 2011, Registration (Amendment) Bill, 2013, Forward Contract Regulation (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and Consumer Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2011.

Abhisekh Nath Tripathi, the Founder of the firm, has specialized in various fields such as private equity, joint ventures, power & infrastructure, renewable energy, construction arbitrations and others.

Eligibility

The National Quiz is only open to all students belonging to 3 year or a 5 year Law course. 

Registration Details 

To participate in the Quiz, please register through the link- https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfmCYhaJ6SNFx2bxiVgi9qhXAnS5v8HPcLJ_E8O8hDMVU80RQ/closedform 

Last date: February 16, 2022 at 11.00 AM.

Fee Details 

The Quiz is free and no fee is required to attend.

Mode and Platform

The Quiz will be conducted online, via Google Forms and Microsoft Teams.

Important Dates

  • Last Date of Registration: February 16, 2022 at 11.00 AM
  • Date of Event: February 17, 2022
    • Time of the Event: 4.30 PM – 6.30 PM

Perks

  1. Certificate of participation will be provided to all the participants who attend the Quiz and fill out the feedback form.
  2. Certificate of merit will be provided to the Top 3 Participants.
  3. The top 3 Participants will be the Winners of the Quiz and shall be awarded with a prestigious Internship at Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors

Brochure

Contact details

  • Ms. Puneet Dhanoa (President) +91 9501517044
  • Mr. Rajrishi Ramaswamy (Vice President) +91 9515916229
  • Email: elc@slsh.edu.in

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About MAIMS

MAIMS was established in 2003 by Maharaja Agrasen Technical Education Society. The Society comprises a group of educationists, eminent industrialists and people from different walks of life. The Society has got success in establishing institutions of repute in the areas of Management, Law, Engineering and Journalism etc.

About the Justice J.S. Verma ADR & Client Counselling Competition 2022

The fest shall comprise various academic competitions and cultural events, which will witness the participation of students from law schools across the nation. It seeks to provide a platform for the exchange of ideas and experiences between students.

The events would serve as academic stimulations and harness skills like self-awareness, critical thinking, organizational skills, and team work, making them better professionals. The event seeks to encourage the effective use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and to promote an open exchange of ideas, experience and technical know-how between students and legal professionals.

MAIMS believes that this competition will encourage students and legal practitioners to adopt better and faster means of dispute resolution.

Along with this, the MAIMS 2nd National Law Fest- NAVITAS which involves various literary and cultural events, is also being organized.

The 5-day competition comprises 17 events, namely:

  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Negotiation
  • Client Counselling
  • Judgement Writing Competition
  • Legal and Constitutional History quiz
  • Extempore Moot Court Competition
  • Creative Writing Competition
  • Conquesta- National Constitutional Law Quiz
  • Article Writing Competition
  • Footloose- Western Dance Competition
  • Harmony- Solo Singing Competition
  • Folklore- Traditional Dance Competition
  • Laughter Nama- Stand Up Comedy
  • Am I Picasso??- Poster Making Competition
  • Cash the tRRRash- Best Out of Waste
  • JAM- Just a Minute

General Details

MAIMS 2nd Justice J.S. Verma ADR & Client Counselling Competition, 2022 & NAVITAS, MAIMS 2nd National Law Fest 2022 is scheduled to be held from 23rd March, 2022 to 27th March, 2022 in virtual mode. 

Registration

Mediation Competition

Arbitration Competition

Negotiation Competition

Client Counselling Competition

Judgment Writing Competition

Extempore Moot Court Competition

Creative Writing Competition

Conquesta-National Constitutional Law Quiz

Article Writing Competition

Footloose- Western Dance Competition

Harmony-Solo Singing Competition

Folklore-Traditional Dance Competition

Laughter-Nama Stand Up Comedy Competition

Am I Picasso? Poster Making Competition

Cash the Trrrash-Best Out of Waste Competition

JAM- Just A Minute Competition

Registration and Fee Payment Details

Kindly refer to the brochure for the registration details of each competition.

Payment Details

Payment Deadline: March 5, 2022

For NEFT/IMPS/BANK Transfer

  • Account Number – 604202050000047
  • Account Holder’s Name – Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies
  • Bank Name – Union Bank of India
  • IFSC Code – UBIN0560421
  • Branch – Sector 22, Rohini, Delhi -110086

Important Dates

  • Registration Deadline for each competition: March 5, 2022
  • Mediation Competition: March 23-25, 2022
  • Arbitration Competition: March 23-25, 2022
  • Negotiation Competition: March 23-25, 2022
  • Client Counselling Competition: March 23-25, 2022
  • Judgement Writing Competition: March 25, 2022
  • Legal and Constitutional History Quiz: March 26, 2022
  • Extempore Moot Court Competitio: March 26, 2022
  • Creative Writing Competition: March 26, 2022
  • Conquesta-National Constitutional Law Quiz: March 26, 2022
  • Article Writing Competition: March 26, 2022
  • Footloose- Western Dance Competition: March 26, 2022
  • Harmony – Solo Singing Competition: March 26, 2022
  • Folklore- Traditional Dance Competition: March 26, 2022
  • Laughter Nama- Stand Up Comedy: March 27, 2022
  • Am I Picasso?? – Poster Making Competition: March 27, 2022
  • Cash the tRRRash – Best Out of Waste: March 27, 2022
  • JAM – Just A Minute: March 27, 2022

Contact details

  • For any queries, feel free to drop us an email at navitalawfest@maims.ac.in or contact the following: 
  • Prince Grover (Programme Co-ordinator): +919958205233
  • Khyaati Bansal (Programme Co-ordinator): +919599230908
  • Kashish Bhardwaj (Programme Co-ordinator): +919821394624
  • Follow our LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook pages for more updates.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd