-Report by Anjana C

The case of M.P. Ramani Vs. State of Kerala & Anr. deals mainly with the forgery of a cheque leaf. Dissatisfied with the order of the Kerala High Court, the petitioner filed an appeal which was ultimately allowed.

FACTS

The appellant, as a de facto complainant, filed a complaint alleging that a cheque from Canara Bank, Payyanur Branch, had been dishonestly acquired and forged with the appellant’s signature for drawing a number of Rs. 3,50,000.  This cheque was presented in the Federal Bank, Payyanur Branch, through the account that was maintained by the respondent. It is also alleged that the cheque that was allotted to the appellant by Canara Bank was over 30 years old and was not in use as a new MCRI number was awaited. Based on the above allegations, a complaint was filed under Sections 420, 46, and 472 of the Indian Penal Code. Post the investigations, the final report was filed before the High Court under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, wherein the respondent was accused of committing the alleged crimes. A petition was filed under Section 482 before the High Court by the appellant for the quashing of the final report.

The allegations against the respondent were fraudulent procurement of the cheque, forgery, and, therein, attempting to obtain the amount of Rs. 3,50,000 from the appellant. The final report for the following was filed under Sections 420, 465, 468, and 472 of the Indian Penal Code. 

However, on inquiry, it was revealed that the cheque belonged to the de facto complainant and contained his very own signature. The allegation in the final report was that the respondent managed to threaten the complainant by using the cheque. Due to the absence of this issue raised by the complainant, the aforementioned final report was quashed, stating that it was an abuse of the court process.

CONTENTIONS OF PARTIES

Aggrieved by this order, the appellant appeared before the High Court “assailing the said order.” 

The Counsels of both parties scrutinized the appeal papers that indicated the specific allegations made by the appellant that the 30-year-old cheque leaf that was said to have not been in use that the respondent procured in order to extract a sum of Rs. 3,50,000 from the appellant. Based on these, the final report was submitted under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This revealed that the investigating officer cited 15 witnesses that led the charge against the respondent with the intention to commit the crime. Therefore, his actions can be considered a punishable offense under Sections 465, 468, and 472 of the IPC. It was noted that the order of the Court was brief and cryptic; the Court had neither paid attention to the facts of the case nor the nature of the allegations. The only observation noted
was of the ownership of the cheque leaf being that of the appellant but was wrongful in the possession of the respondent and that the instrument contained the appellant’s signature, and that there was no allegation of threat.

COURT’S DECISION

The High Court decided to quash the final report as they deemed it suitable to restore the petition and enable the parties to put forward their contentions to facilitate the High Court to take a comprehensive decision after taking all matters of fact and law into consideration. This enables a fresh start and decision, and the contentions are left open to both parties. The appeal was allowed, and all pending applications regarding this matter stood disposed off.

School of Law, Bennett University is organizing an International Conference on 40 years of UNCLOS: Examining the Success and Failures on September 24, 2022, in online mode and inviting submissions in the form of a call for papers.

ABOUT

Bennett University established the School of Law with a vision to strive for excellence in teaching, research, and advocacy toward Justice for all by shaping thought leaders in public policy of National and International dimensions.

THEME

  • Delimitation
  • Marine Environment and Climate Change
  • Marine Security and Defense issues.
  • Human Rights Issues
  • Deep Sea Mining
  • Dispute Resolution Mechanism
  • General issues pertaining to law of sea and maritime law
  • A multidisciplinary approach to the study of the law of sea
  • Any other topic related to the theme

ELIGIBILITY

Any interested student, researcher, academician, or policymaker from Indian and foreign institutions can submit their abstract for consideration.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

  • Each applicant must submit a maximum 500-word abstract by e-mail to bennettsolconference2022@gmail.com no later than August 20, 2022.
  • The abstract must contain details about the names of the author(s), contact details, institutional affiliation, and designation.
  • A maximum of 5 keywords are to be provided along with the abstract.
  • Co-authorship is permissible for up to two authors only.
  • Acceptance of the abstracts shall be communicated via email by August 25, 2022.
  • On selection of the abstract, the author(s) must pay the required fees no later than September 2, 2022. The link for the payment portal shall be sent to the authors whose abstract would be selected along with the acceptance mail.
  • The last date for submission of the full-length paper is September 15, 2022.
  • All papers must be submitted to bennettsolconference2022@gmail.com.
  • The full-length paper should not exceed 6000 words (exclusive of footnotes). It must have the abstract and details of the authors.
  • In the case of co-authorship, at least one author must attend the conference to present the paper.
  • The main text should be in Times New Roman with a font size 12 and spacing of 1.5.
  • The footnotes should be in Times New Roman, font size 10 with single spacing.
  • Referencing style: 20th Blue Book edition.
  • Plagiarism: All submissions must be the author’s original and unpublished work.

IMPORTANT DATES

  1. Abstract Submission deadline: August 20, 2022
  2. Date of Communication of acceptance of abstract: August 25, 2022
  3. Date of Payment of Registration Fee: On selection of the abstract, the author(s) must pay the required fees no later than September 2, 2022. The link for the payment portal shall be sent only to the authors whose abstract would be selected along with the acceptance mail. For registration, proof of payment indicating the transaction reference number along with the full name, affiliation, and email id must be sent to the email bennettsolconference2022@gmail.com
  4. Full Paper Submission by September 15, 2022

CONTACT DETAILS

bennettsolconference2022@gmail.com

https://www.bennett.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Call-for-papers-UNCLOS-1.pdf

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About Dr. Vasudeva

Dr. Vasudeva is a Supreme Court, High Court, and Tribunals Advocate-on-Record. He participates in numerous government committees.

About the Responsibility  

For the months of August and September 2022, the Dr. Vikrant Narayan Vasudeva Law Office in New Delhi is accepting applications for a physical and virtual internship opportunity. Arbitration and civil and criminal litigation would both be part of the task.

Location

New Delhi E-38, LGF, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi – 110014

Openings

2

Time Period

August and September 2022

Stipend

No

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may apply from here: –  Cover Letter, CV, and a Writing Sample to vnvlegal@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Department of Law, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies (MAIMS), under the aegis of IQAC, is organizing a Value Added Course on Criminal Law from August 22 to September 9, 2022 in online mode.

ABOUT

MAIMS was established in 2003 by Maharaja Agrasen Technical Education Society. The Department of Law was established in 2017 as a unit of the Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies.

ELIGIBILITY

The organizers are inviting the students pursuing B.A.LL.B, B.B.A.LL.B, and LL.M in any stream to register and participate in the value-added course on Criminal Law.

AREAS TO BE COVERED

  • Juvenile Justice System – Critical Analysis
  • Gender-Based Violence in India
  • Murder Versus Culpable Homicide
  • Confession: Will it lead to Conviction?
  • Bail Jurisprudence India
  • Child Abuse Laws in India
  • Punishing Inchoate Crimes
  • Conviction Under 498A – A Study
  • Rights and Safeguards of Arrested / Accused Persons
  • Stages of Criminal Trial
  • How Far Can You Take the Right of Private Defence?
  • Importance of Dying Declaration
  • Bargaining for Your Life – Law of Plea Bargaining in India
  • Fair Investigation: Sine Qua Non for Fair Trial
  • Victimology: An Emerging Discipline
  • International Criminal Law & Procedure
  • Cross-Examining a Witness: Supreme Skill of a Lawyer
  • Restorative Justice: A Burgeoning Theory in India
  • Marvels of Forensic Science in Solving Criminal Cases
  • Custodial Violence in India: Law & Practice

DETAILS

  • Please register for the course through the link given at the end of this post latest by August 20, 2022
  • Registration is on a first-come-first-serve basis with limited seats!
  • Registration Fee:
    • For MAIMS Students: INR 300
    • For Others: INR 500      
  • Dates of the Course: August 22 to September 9, 2022
  • Days: Monday to Friday
  • Time: 4 PM to 5:30 PM

DEADLINE

August 20, 2022

CONTACT DETAILS

+91 70428 60645

https://forms.gle/PVbm9pkbgsKSD81Z9

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

GNLU is organizing Short Term Certificate Course for all law students.

ABOUT

The GNLU Centre for Law and Technology is organizing a two-day online short-term certificate course on “FinTech and Challenges” on the 3rd & 4th of September 2022. The Centre is proud to announce Mr. Suvendu Pati, Chief General Manager FinTech Department, Reserve Bank of India, Dr. Sanjay Tyagi, Director Software Technology Parks of India Chennai, Mr. Harish Natarajan, Lead Payments & Market Infrastructure, World Bank, Prof. (Dr.) D. Janakiram, Director Institute for Development and Research in Banking Technology, Prof. (Dr.) Ashok Jhunjhunwala, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Prof. (Dr.) Arvind Sahay, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Mr. Mohan Venkateshwaran, Deputy Legal Advisor, Reserve Bank of India, Mr. S. Vasudevan, Executive Partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys and Ms. Shilpa Mankar Ahluwalia, Partner Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. as the distinguished Resource persons for the course.

DETAILS

  • The course will be held online through Cisco-WebEx and the link for the same will be shared with the participant’s registered E-mail.
  • The registration fee for the same is Rs. 600/- for students (UG/PG/M.Phil/Ph.D),
  • Rs. 1250/- for academicians and
  • Rs. 2000 for others.

DEADLINE

1st September 2022

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdFpssfe3db2EV5uUDPQuCnK0_8X3i0UkZEUcaJXY_8TZGAWQ/viewform

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

INTRODUCTION

The word limitation means a rule or restriction. The limitation law provides a strict time limit in which the aggrieved person can approach the court for justice and after the expiry of a certain period the suit cannot be maintained in the court of law. The Law of Limitation is procedural.  Law of limitation has originated from the legal maxim “Vgilantibus Non-Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt” which means the law assist only vigilant one and not those who sleep over their right. The meaning of this maxim is that people should be vigilant while exercising some rights. Any legal infringement will automatically be invalid if the aggrieved party does not file a case within a stipulated period. There is also another legal maxim named “Interest Reipublicae Ut Sit Finis Litium” which means in the interest of all individuals as a whole the litigation must come to an end. The limitation Act, 1859 was enacted in 1963 and came into force on 1st January 1964 for the purpose of keeping the limitation principle to suits and other legal proceedings.

ORIGIN OF LAW OF LIMITATION

The doctrine of Limitation was common law in England. As India was also a part of a British colony, the Law of Limitation came into existence in our country. As the courts were established in Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras statutory laws were passed from time to time. In 1859 Limitation Act was passed and it was applicable under the Code of Civil Procedure. It came into operation in 1862. It was replaced in the year 1871 as it added a limitation period to appeal, in filing suits and extinguished the right to land for a specific period. Then it was replaced in the year 1877 when there was extinguishment in rights of moveable property. Then it was again repealed and replaced in the year 190. Then after independence, the Third Law Commission suggested repealing the previous acts and the Limitation Act was passed in 1963 and came into force in 1964.

FEATURES OF LIMITATION ACT, 1963

The main object of the Limitation Act of 1963 is the limitation to litigation and that they should be fixed within a period. It does not mean to destroy or infringe the rights of an aggrieved person but it saves time for the purpose of the general welfare of the public. The major consideration in this limitation is that the right related to property should not be in a state of doubt or uncertainty. The Limitation Act is not to destroy the rights but it is an Act for fixing lifespan for legal remedy.

The Limitation Act contains 32 sections and 137 Articles. The articles are divided into 10 parts which include accounts, contracts, torts, moveable, immoveable property, trust property, etc. There is no same limitation period for all suits and it varies according to classification. The limitation period is also reduced for some cases like a suit by mortgager from 60 to 30 years.  A longer period of 12 years is for the immoveable property suits, a period of 1 to 3 years for torts and suits with no period of limitation scheduled to the Act. A person sentenced to the death penalty by Session or High Court has been given a limit of up to 30 days to file an appeal case. The limitation period applies equally for a certain matter in all personal laws, there is no distinction on basis of any class or race. For filing a suit against foreign ambassadors there must be the consent of the central government so this time of getting consent is excluded in the Limitation Act when filing suit. Sections 12 to 15 deal with the time excluded from the period of computing the limitation period like the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the judgment, the time required for obtaining the copy of the award, etc. The main purpose of this Act is not to drag the case for a long period of time and aims for quick disposal of the cases.

WHETHER THIS ACT IS EXHAUSTIVE?

The Limitation Act is exhaustive as it deals with all the matters. The Act applies only to civil cases except in matters expressly and specifically provided for the purpose. It cannot be extended by analogy. In A.S.Krishnappa Chettiar v. Nahiappa Chettiar1 case, it was stated that amending statutes relating to suits, and appeals to the courts must be regarded as exhaustive. Courts are not permitted to interpret beyond the provision as it is exhaustive already. There are certain rules for interpretation as the act itself is an exhaustive one. The rules of interpretation are –

  1. The court cannot neglect or change the mandatory provisions. Eg if the time framing lapses then a reasonable cause must be given to the court.
  2. If there is no specific limitation period then the court can fix a certain limited, reasonable period.
  3. If there are two interpretations of a particular statute, then the court doesn’t need to follow strict interpretation.
  4. Limitation statutes are given a fair and liberal construction rather than strict ones.

In Ramnath Prasad vs State transport Apellate2 case, it was stated that Limitation Act is undoubtedly an exhaustive code. There is nothing in the Limitation Act to justify to the court that once the period of limitation has begun to run, it can be suspended except for the proviso mentioned in Section 9 of the Limitation Act. In Thirumalai Chemicals Ltd vs Union Of India3 it was stated that the statutes of limitation are retrospective as they applied to all legal proceedings that have occurred earlier and it is procedural.

LIMITATION BARS THE REMEDY NOT THE RIGHT

Limitation Act bars the remedy not the right, the plaintiff can prove that the suit is time-barred debt. Law of Limitation is a part of Lexi Fori because the contract is regulated according to the law of the place where the action is instituted. In Rullia Ram Hakim Rai vs S. Fateh Singh S. Sham Sher Singh4 case, it was held that the limitation does not stand in between the recovery that is time-barred. The court should dismiss the suit if it is filed beyond the time mentioned in the limitation act where section 3 states that the court will not proceed with the suit if it is time-barred. In Ittyavira Mathai vs Varkey Varkey5 case, it was stated that if the court makes an error of law, the error can be corrected in the manner laid down by CPC. If the aggrieved party did not take notice of the error then it is not challenged to nullity. Order 7 Rule 6 CPC states that if a suit is instituted after the limitation period then the person must show on the ground in which such exemption of law can be claimed.

There is no particular stage in which the plea of limitation can be raised. A party to the case can make the plea of limitation even in the 1st appeal or in the proceeding appeal even though he may not have mentioned the plea of limitation in the written statement. If the period of any suit or appeal expires on the day on which the court is closed (on normal working days if closed) then it is preferred on the day on which the court reopens. The extension of time is given only in certain cases like if the party produces a sufficient cause of delay then the case is taken by the court under section 5 of the Limitation Act. A sufficient cause would be an adequate reason or reasonable ground for the court to believe that the person was prevented from filing the suit. For example, suppose during the limitation period the person was found Covid positive then the person will be prevented from filing the suit so this can be a reasonable cause so that even after the expiry of the limitation period the person can file the suit.

CONCLUSION

The Law of Limitation is said to be an exhaustive one and it has dealt with all civil matters, and if there is no limitation period mentioned for any civil matter then the court can fix a reasonable time for the civil matters. This Act keeps check on the case and makes sure that people are not harassed and the case is also not dragged for a longer period of time. The Act also provides an exception when there is a reasonable cause for the delay within the time prescribed for filing a suit. The court must hear the matter first and decide according whether the case should be taken or not. Law of Limitation plays a major role in a country like India so that people get justice on time. 


REFERENCES

  1. AIR 1964 SC
  2. AIR 1957 Pat 117
  3. SC; Civil Appeal 3191-3194 of 2011
  4. AIR 1962 PH 256
  5. AIR 1964 SC 407

This article is written by Sree Lekshmi B J, third-year law student; Sastra University, Thanjavur.

INTRODUCTION

A person who works in prostitution is referred to as a prostitute or a sex worker. Prostitution is the practice or business where people participate in sexual behavior for payment. Prostitution can take place in a variety of settings, and its legal position varies from country to country as well as from region to region within a country. It can range from being an upheld or unenforced violation to being an uncontrolled or a directed vocation. In the same way that pornography or any other form of sexual entertainment is a component of the sex industry. Brothels are establishments that are solely focused on prostitution. Prostitution laws and conditions are generally changing globally, reflecting divergent judgments. Prostitution is perceived by some as a form of violence or cruelty against women and children that leads to the grave crime of human trafficking.

HISTORY OF PROSTITUTION IN INDIA

According to Indian history, prostitutes in the past were called “Devadasi,” and they gave their entire lives to serving Lord Krishna. Some religious beliefs hold that the Devadasis see the Gods as their spouses and, as a result, are not permitted to marry other human beings. Later referred to as “Nagarvadhu” or the “Brides of the town,” they were requested to perform for and by the wealthy and the aristocracy. According to historical experts, the royal families regarded the Devadasi with respect and deference, prior to British domination. No man, not even the Mughals and Kings, intended to even approach them. However, as the British entered the country, this stopped.

In front of the British commanders, the Devadasis started showcasing their talent, which led to the first one-night stands. The British started summoning these artists for sex, which prepared India for prostitution. The emergence of Devadasi as a prostitution business during the British era led to a decline in temple dances. As time went on under British control, the Indian economy shriveled and the majority of people struggled to make a living. Women then began trading their bodies for cash with the British populace.

Japanese women were captured and sent to India as sex slaves in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries when some regions of India were Portuguese provinces. Another instance of the increased use of women as sex slaves was under the Company Rule in India. For its soldiers, the military constructed whorehouses all over India. Village girls and women were employed by the brothels and officially compensated by the military.

IS PROSTITUTION LEGAL IN INDIA?

When it comes to prostitution, there are three different types of nations.

  • Where prostitution is prohibited and against the law, such as in Kenya, Morocco, Afghanistan, etc.
  • Where prostitution is permitted with certain limitations and restrictions, such as in India, Canada, France, etc.
  • In countries with appropriate legal regulations, such as New Zealand, Australia, Austria, the Netherlands, etc., prostitution is permitted.

One of the most important questions is whether prostitution is permitted in India, and if so, whether prostitutes have any rights.

In India, prostitution is permitted subject to several restrictions. It’s against the law to engage in activities including pimping, child prostitution, service solicitation in public areas, owning a brothel, and pandering. To address the issue of prostitution and trafficking, various state laws have been passed, including the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act) (JJ), 2015, the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, the Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act (PITA), and the Constitution of India, 1950. PITA, formerly known as the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act of 1956, was enacted and put into effect after India on May 9, 1950, in New York, ratified the United Nations Declaration for the Suppression of Women Trafficking.

The penalty for operating a brothel is a fine of up to 2,000 rupees and a sentence of one to three years in prison. The punishment for child prostitution is seven years of hard labour, with the possibility of life in jail. According to Section 370A of the IPC, the offender who takes advantage of a youngster who has been trafficked faces a five to seven-year prison sentence. They are entitled to getting the fundament rights of a citizen promised to them by the Constitution.

COURT RULINGS

  1.  Budhadev Karmaskar v State of West Bengal – The case dealt with the brutal murder of Chhaya Rani Pal alias Buri, a sex worker who succumbed to grievous injuries after being brutally beaten up by the accused, Budhadev.
  2.  Gaurav Jain v Union of India – The Supreme Court, passed a request, coordinating inter alia, the constitution of a council to make a thorough investigation of the issue of prostitution, young girls, and their offspring, and to advance reasonable plans for their salvage and recovery.
  3. Manoj Shaw & Manoj Kumar Shaw v State of Bengal – It was observed that sex workers should be treated as victims and not accused. When prostitution was busted, the prostitutes were put behind bars whereas the owner of the bar was merely sent a notice. This didn’t seem fair.

RECENT HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT

Kajal Mukesh Singh & Ors. v. State Of Maharashtra (2021)

‘Prostitution is not an offence; a woman has a right to choose her vocation’

  1. A, B, and C, the petitioners
  2. The State of Maharashtra is the respondent.
  3. The Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act of 1956 declared that the petitioners were the victims of the crime of pimping. They are listed in the records as A, B, and C to avoid being identified. Three sex workers filed the petition in an effort to overturn the orders made by the Metropolitan Magistrate Mazgaon and the Additional Sessions Court Dindoshi, both of which supported the prior judgement.

Observation of the High Court: The Court emphasized that the act’s goal is not to outlaw prostitution or prostitutes; rather, what is punished is sexual exploitation, commercial sex, and situations in which someone is running a brothel or enticing someone else. As their fundamental rights are protected by Article III of the Constitution, they too have the freedom to live as they like and to practice their chosen profession. Since the victims are adults and have the same fundamental rights as regular citizens, their permission should have been sought before placing them in a corrective facility.

PROBLEMS OR CHALLENGES FACED BY SEX WORKERS IN INDIA

The sex workers in India face multiple traumas – sexual violence, emotional abuse, and physical assaults from clients. Their living conditions are appalling as well; crowded streets and cramped quarters are negatively impacting their health, which leads to an increase in health-related issues. HIV, STDs, and cervical cancer are on the rise amongst them as little action has been taken to improve their situation. Additionally, they experience crippling prejudice and stigma, which makes it harder for them to defend their health and wellbeing.

There are many reasons why prostitution continues to thrive in society. Ill-treatment by parents, bad relationships, disturbed family culture, social customs, lack of sex education, media image, rape, early marriage, and desertion are just to name a few. The rights of sex workers are in reality non-existent even though they appear just like other citizens on paper. Prostitutes are continuously looked down upon and have no place in society, most of them are exposed to a slew of abuses, and they face harassment from clients as well as their own family members.

LAWS RELATING TO PROSTITUTION IN INDIA

  • Section 372 and 373 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 deal with prostitution but it is only restricted to child prostitution.
  • Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act – 1956
  • The legislation governing sex work in India is the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, enacted in 1956.
  • The legislation penalizes acts such as keeping a brothel, soliciting in a public place, living off the earning of sex work, and living or habitually being in the company of a sex worker.
  • Section 366 A, 366 B, 370A, of the IPC deal with punishment for offences of procreation with respect to a minor girl, importation of a girl from abroad for sexual purposes, and exploitation of a trafficked person respectively. Under IPC, laws relating to prostitution are quite limited.

SEX TRAFFICKING IN INDIA

For women and children who are victims of sex trafficking, India serves as a source destination and transit country. The majority of India’s trafficking issues are internal, and the most susceptible groups are those from the most economically and socially disadvantaged socioeconomic strata – those who belong to tribal & other backward communities. According to reports, thousands of unregulated labour placement firms use deceptive employment promises to recruit individuals and children into sex trafficking.

According to experts, sex trafficking affects millions of women and children in India. Traffickers subject women and girls to sex trafficking by making false work promises or setting up fictitious marriages in India or the Gulf states. In addition to typical red-light districts, tiny motels, cars, huts, and private homes are increasingly becoming the places where women and children are subjected to sex trafficking. In India, sex trafficking affects a large number of women and girls, primarily from Nepal and Bangladesh as well as Central Asia, Africa, and Asia, especially the Rohingya and other minority communities from Burma.

PROSTITUTION BEING LEGALISED

  1. It will result in sex workers living better lives.
  2. Labour rights will be given to sex workers.
  3. The authorities will have the information necessary to monitor whether any minors are engaged in prostitution.
  4. Forced Prostitution will not exist.
  5. Fewer instances of trafficking and rape.
  6. Financial empowerment. 
  7. Reduction in minor sex workers.

 DEFENSIBLE PROSTITUTION–RELATED OFFENCES 

  • Anyone who owns, operates, or aids in operating a brothel will be subject to a fine of up to two thousand rupees as well as a sentence of imprisonment of at least one year and a maximum of three years.
  • Anyone who coaxes, buys, or kidnaps a girl with the intent to force her into prostitution faces a minimum sentence of seven years in prison and a maximum of fourteen years in prison as well as a fine of up to 2,000 rupees.
  • Anyone caught holding a woman in brothels faces a minimum sentence of seven years in prison and a maximum of 10 years in prison.
  • Any person who engages in prostitution within 200 m of a public area, such as a hostel, hospital, temple, etc., faces a sentence of up to three months in prison. When a kid is involved, the crime is punishable by a minimum seven-year sentence that could go up to ten years in prison.
  • Anyone caught soliciting prostitutes faces a sentence of up to one year in prison or a fine of Rs. 500 on their first offence, and up to two years in prison on their second offence.

STEPS THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN IN ORDER TO FIGHT WITH PROSTITUTION

  • The victims who are still of school-going age should have access to formal education, while adults should have access to non-formal education.
  • All rescued victims who are not interested in education should get gender-sensitive, market-driven vocational training from the central and state governments in collaboration with non-governmental organizations.
  • Rehabilitation and reintegration of rescued victims is a long-term process, recruitment of a sufficient number of qualified social workers and counselors in government-run institutions and homes, either on their own or in cooperation with non-governmental groups.
  • It is important to promote legal literacy and awareness of economic rights, especially for women and adolescent girls.

CONCLUSION

Finally, it may be concluded from the study that it would be foolish to turn blind eye to it and act as though the system and its problems do not exist in a society where prostitution has been a long-standing profession and is still prospering as a business. By offering greater pay, health security, and protection, legalizing sex work will improve the quality of life for sex workers. Additionally, it will be a progressive move on the part of society to get rid of numerous societal ills like child prostitution, rape, sex trafficking. and other things.


This article is written by Aditi Jangid, a 1st year law student pursuing bachelor’s degree from Delhi Metropolitan Education (Affiliated to GGSIPU).

About the Organization

The specialised team at Precinct Legal offers its clients representational and consulting services on a variety of legal matters, including commercial, intellectual property, and constitutional challenges.

About the Responsibilities  

Precinct Legal is currently accepting applications for the long-term internship programme.

As an intern you are required to: –

  • Assist in preparing and filing various matters before the Karnataka Electricity Regulation Commission (KERC), Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL), and High Court of Karnataka. The role may involve conducting research and drafting work on regulations related to Open Access, Deviation settlement mechanisms, Wheeling & Banking of Electricity, Power Purchase Agreement, and other Energy Law related matters.

Location

Bangalore

Eligibility

  • 3rd, 4th, and 5th year BA.LL.B/LLB students
  • possess effective communication skills.
  • excellent legal knowledge (Electricity Law, Law of Contracts)

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may apply from here: –  adv.kartikeyayadav@tutanota.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

The Society for Quiz, University Institute of Legal Studies, Panjab University, Chandigarh is organizing a National Online Quiz Competition on the topic “Intellectual Property Rights”.

ABOUT

One of the oldest universities in India, Panjab University (PU) established in Lahore in 1882, has a long tradition of pursuing excellence in teaching and research in science and technology, humanities, social sciences, performing arts, and sports. The glorious traditions of the University established during more than 138 years of its service to the nation are a source of inspiration for the present generation of faculty members and students.

ELIGIBILITY

Any student pursuing any course in any college or University across India may participate in the quiz.

SCHEME

  • All the questions in the quiz will be in the Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) format.
  • The participant who submits the quiz earlier will be preferred in case of a tie between the participants. ·
  • The participants registering for the quiz via the Google Registration form will receive a confirmation mail from our side. ·
  • The participants of the event will be added by the team of SFQ in the Quiz WhatsApp group for the purpose of this event.
  • Organizers will not be responsible for any technical error in the registration for the quiz competition or any connectivity/device failure during the quiz.

IMPORTANT DATES

  1. Last Date of Registration: August 23 2022 Tuesday (11:59 PM)
  2. Quiz Competition (Round I): August 26 2022 Friday (3:00-4:00 PM)
  3. Result Declaration (Round I): August 27 2022 Saturday
  4. Quiz Competition (Round II): August 28 2022 Sunday
  5. Result Declaration (Round II): August 28 2022 Sunday

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeXhMd8rF0mGiWXJPjsaZvPJnlt06jCKpNPCx7wp7ko4QREEQ/viewform?usp=pp_url

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

HNLUSR is inviting print submissions for Volume IV, Issue I by early September for our fall issue latest by September 1.

ABOUT

The Hidayatullah National Law University Student Review (HNLUSR) seeks to publish innovative, original scholarship that significantly contributes to the field of law.

HNLUSR is a bi-annual publication, student-edited, peer-reviewed, open-access law journal dedicated to publishing legal scholarship by lawmakers, judges, practitioners, academics, legal scholars, and students, and its articles are made available in print, through our website, and via SCCOnline.

SUBMISSION CATEGORIES

The Review publishes Articles, Essays, and select Book Reviews in its print volumes, and shorter analytical pieces on HNLUSR Online, the online companion to the Review.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

  • Style Guidelines: Please use 12pt Times New Roman font and double-space the text of your article. For the footnotes, use 10pt Times New Roman font and single-spacing. The article should use 1-inch margins and include page numbers in the bottom-right corner of the page. All submissions must be made in Microsoft Word. It is encouraged to use gender-neutral language.
  • Headings: For better structure, different levels of headings may be used. It is advisable to restrict these to three levels generally, excepting special circumstances where a fourth level may be used. Please refer to the following format:
  • HEADING 1: TIMES NEW ROMAN, SIZE 12, BOLD, SMALL CAPITALS, CENTER ALIGN.
  • Heading 2 – Times New Roman, Size 12, Underlined, Left Align.
  • Heading 3 – Times New Roman, Size 12, Italics, Left Align.
  • Length Limitations: Except in extraordinary circumstances, they will not publish articles exceeding the limitations below, which include text, footnotes, and appendices. The following word limit will be exclusive of one prescribed for Abstract.
  • Articles: They prefer article submissions that are between 6,000 and 10,000 words in total length. Articles tend to analyze a problem and suggest a solution. Such analysis usually articulates some background information to inform the reader before turning to a novel argument. Along these lines, published articles regularly follow a traditional roadmap of introduction, background, analysis/argument, and conclusion, and provide a comprehensive treatment of a particular area of law. Articles tend to be formal in both the author’s tone and in the obligation to ground information and analysis in comprehensive substantive via consistent citation.
  • Essays: Essays are similar to an article in content and style, but the total length of words is limited to 3,000-6,000. Essays tend to explore novel issues. While they are similar to Articles both with respect to scope and sophistication, Essays tend to differ from Articles in that they often exercise significantly more structural, stylistic, and substantive flexibility. Essay authors wield this flexibility in a wide variety of ways, with some choosing to pursue an ambitious or provocative rethinking of an area of the law or a commentary on a legal concept or doctrine intended for a peer audience.
  • Comments: Commentaries on recent court cases or legislative developments, limited to a total length of 2,500–5,000 words.
  • Book Reviews: Review of a recent and relevant book, limited to a total length of 1,000–2,500 words. Book reviews provide a unique opportunity to comment on contemporary legal scholarship. Book Reviews range in style and length, but typically include a description of the book, and accompanying critical analysis, and an evaluation of the book in relation to relevant areas of the law. Book Reviews should not merely summarise the book, but instead offer an argument as to the merit and significance of the work.
  • Citation Format: Please use footnotes rather than endnotes. Footnotes must conform to the OSCOLA (Oxford University Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities) (4th) style of citation.
  • Language: All manuscripts should be submitted in English. Please use the British English standard when American English and British English grammatical or spelling conventions differ.
  • Author Eligibility: They accept submissions from legal scholars, practitioners, and students. Co-authorship is limited to a maximum of three authors.

SUBMISSION PROCESS

Submissions should be made electronically in Microsoft Word format. Please send your submission as email attachments to submissions.hnlusr@gmail.com, with a subject line in the following format “Print Submission – [Authors(s) Name]”, e.g., “Print Submission – John Doe”.

In addition to the article manuscript, submissions should include (i) a cover letter with the name(s) of the author(s), institution/affiliation, the title of the manuscript, and contact information (email ID and phone number); and (ii) a short abstract of not more than 250 words.

DEADLINE

September 1, 2022

CONTACT DETAILS

submissions.hnlusr@gmail.com

https://hnlusr.wordpress.com/

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd