About the Journal (AIJJS)

Amity International Journal of Juridical Science (AIJJS) is published annually by Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida bearing ISSN 2395-4019. It is a faculty-run Annual Blind Peer Refereed Journal whose primary goal is to serve as an important legal scholarship academic forum on any issue.

Word Limit

  • Research Articles (words between 5000 to 6000, except footnotes)
  • Book Review/Case Comments (2500 words, except footnotes)

Please follow the prescribed word limit.

Formatting Guidelines

  • The manuscript body must be in the “Times New Roman” font with font size 12, line spacing 1.5 and the “justified” alignment with 1 inch margins on all sides of page with page numbers;
  • All footnotes must be in “Times New Roman” with font size 10, line spacing 1. Endnotes are not allowed and speaking footnotes are generally discouraged;
  • All submissions must follow the “Bluebook: A Uniform Citation System (19th edition).” Failure to comply could be a ground for rejection;
  • Submissions should be made in Microsoft Office (doc./docx.) with formatting and citation style only. Any kind of plagiarism will lead to immediate disqualification. The paper should not contain of any kind of errors in grammar and spelling.

General Submission Guidelines

  • Each submission must be accompanied by an abstract of no more than 500 words outlining the study area and any important conclusions that the author(s) may draw and at most 5 keywords.
  • Covering Letter: All personal details, including name, year, college/university name, postal address, phone number and email Id, must be submitted in a separate file and must not be included in the article submission document or file.
  • Co-authorship is allowed to a maximum of 2 authors. However, co-authorship is not allowed in case of Case Comment and Book Review.
  • Submissions must be submitted to als.aijjs[at]gmail.com with the subject line “Submission of Manuscripts for Volume VII”. The deadline for submissions is May 31, 2022.
  • All papers must be accompanied by a ‘Conclusion’ stating the views and opinions of the authors on the subject.
  • Authors can expect to receive their submission decisions within two months of submission.
  • Kindly note that the manuscript review procedure is based on the author’s anonymity and the editor’s and reviewer’s reports are kept confidential at all phases of development. Author anonymity is also maintained during the process of editorial decision-making.
  • AIJJS publishes only original and unpublished material. Manuscripts must therefore not, at any time during the period of consideration by the Journal, be considered for publication in any other place, nor published beforehand.
  • The Law Journal has a strict plagiarism policy as well. Only 15% Plagiarism is allowed, rest should be the original work of the author(s). Plagiarised manuscripts shall be liable for rejection of the same. 

All entries shall be copyrighted exclusively with Amity Law School, Noida. The submission would imply that the author has assigned such rights to Amity Law School, Noida.

Contact details

Mail at: als.aijjs@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organiser

Unitedworld School of Law (UWSL) is a constituent school of Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat.

The school is duly recognized by the Bar Council of India and is imparting high quality legal education the aim of percolating constitutional values in the students of Law, to constantly work for the betterment of the nation through legal education and to effectively contribute and strengthen justice delivery system, making law, implementing law and interpreting the law in India.

UWSL offers interdisciplinary law programs namely, BB.A. LL.B. (Hons.) with various specializations like IPR, Business Law, Criminal Law, International Law, LL.M. as well as doctoral programs. UWSL in a short span of its existence has adopted diverse strategies to create a lively pedagogic environment.

About the Competition

Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University has a vibrant and active mooting culture, with a student population of roughly 500 students. The Karnavati University Moot Court Society (KUMCS) is a student-run committee under the guidance of faculty Advisors, which seeks to channelize the students on the mooting path.

KUMCS aims at providing opportunities to hone Research, Argumentation and Legal Drafting Skills and other essential prowess to mould an individual into an adept mooter.

In order to achieve this objective, the KUMCS has organized various events like Memo Pundits for enhancing drafting skills, Intra Moot competitions to nurture drafting and argumentation skills, National Client Counselling Competition etc.

Eligibility

All universities, colleges, and institutions imparting legal education on a regular or evening basis in a program of study that leads to a Bachelor’s degree in law (Three year or Five year) or Masters in law (LL.M / ML) are eligible to participate in the Moot Court competition.

All students enrolled on a full-time or evening basis in a program of study leading to or equivalent to a Bachelor’s degree in law (LL.B / BL) or Master’s in law (LL.M / ML), are eligible to participate.

Location

Moot Court Room, Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat.

How to Register?

Teams from different colleges can register their candidature by submitting duly filled registration forms before deadlines.

Fee details

  • Registration Fee is 3000/- (Rupees Three Thousands Only) only.
  • Registration Fee is a NON-REFUNDABLE, in case of non-participation or otherwise as may deem fit.

Prizes

  • Winning Team: Rs. 40,000/-
  • Runner up Team: Rs. 30,000/-
  • 2nd Runner up Team: Rs. 20,000/-
  • Best Memorial: Rs. 10,000/-
  • 2nd Best Memorial: Rs. 5,000/-
  • Best Speaker: Rs. 10,000/-
  • 2nd Best Speaker: Rs. 5,000/-

Memento prizes shall be declared in valedictory.

Contact details

  • Student Committee:
    Convener–Ms. Palak Mehta:+91-9586973718
    Co-Convener–Mr. Manthan Sharma:+91-8562846724
  • Moot Registration & Procedural Compliance Committee Co-ordinator: Mr. Varun Modasia (+91 81403 00444)
  • Hospitality Committee Co-ordinator- Ms. Devanshi Jain (+91 6354139797); Mr. Ayush Bhandari (+91 9173530918)

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organizer

With an aim to promote active discourse and deliberation in the field of Women and Child Rights development, Gujarat National Law University established the Centre for Women and Child Rights on 15th of September, 2020.

The high prevalence of malnutrition, the high neonatal mortality rate, poor coverage of full immunization, the declining sex ratio and child marriage pose a challenge to improving human development outcomes for every child in Gujarat and it is pertinent that more time, research and resources are allocated to make sure children have a safe, healthy and flourishing childhood.

With these goals, Gujarat National Law University has established the Centre for Women and Child Rights to carry out research and capacity-building activities in the field of women and child rights.

About the Essay Writing Competition

GNLU’s Centre for Women and Child Rights is inviting submissions for the GCWCR Essay Writing Competition, 2022 on the theme of ‘Reproductive Rights in India’.

Theme– Reproductive Rights in India

Sub-Themes

  • Key Policies/Schemes addressing Sexual and Reproductive Health in India
  • Family Planning Practices in India
  • Infertility and Surrogacy – Legal Framework
  • Adoption: Legal and Societal Challenges
  • Abortion Rights
  • Child Marriage- Sexual and Reproductive Health of the Young
  • Impact of raising legal marriage of age on the reproductive rights of individuals

The sub-themes are merely indicative. Any contemporary legal issue relevant to the theme may be written upon. Inter-disciplinary and comparative approaches are highly encouraged. 

Eligibility 

All students pursuing under-graduate (three/five year) or post-graduate law degrees from any law school/university/college recognized by the Bar Council of India are eligible to participate in the Essay Competition.

Submission Guidelines

  • The word limit for the essay is 2500 words (inclusive of footnotes). 
  • All submissions must be original and unpublished work of the author(s). All submissions should be plagiarism free and within the permissible plagiarism percentage of 10%.
  • Co-authorship of a maximum of 2 authors is permitted.
  • Disclosure of information regarding the identity of author(s), including, but not limited to name, institution’s details, professional details, etc., within the body of the manuscript or other parts of the document submitted is strictly prohibited.
  • The participants are required to submit their manuscript by mailing it to cwcr@gnlu.ac.in.
  • The participants are required to provide their details (Name, Year of Study and Name of Institution) in the body of the e-mail. 
  • The essays can be submitted in .doc or .docx format.
  • Only one submission per author or a team of co-authors is permissible. In case of more than one submission, only the one received first would be considered for review.

Formatting and Citation Guidelines

  • Font Style- Times New Roman; Size- 12;  Justified; Line Spacing- 1.5
  • Authorities must be cited in the form of footnotes.
  • Citations must follow the 20th Edition Bluebook citation style.
  • For footnotes: 
    • Font Style- Times New Roman 
    • Size- 10  
    • Alignment- Justified 
    • Line Spacing- 1

Prizes

  • 1st Prize: ₹5,000
  • 2nd Prize: ₹3,000
  • 3rd Prize: ₹2,000
  • Top TEN Essays will be published on the GCWCR Blog, and their writers will be awarded with a CERTIFICATE OF MERIT.

Important Dates

  • Last date of submission: 1st March 2022 (8:00 PM IST)
  • Date of announcement of results: Mid-March

Competition Guidelines

  • There is no registration fees to be paid for participation.
  • By submitting the article, the author(s) forfeit their copyright over their manuscript in favour of the organizers.
  • In case of any dispute, the decision of the organizers will be final and binding. The Centre retains absolute discretion in marking the manuscripts.

Contact details

For queries, contact:

Number: +91 9777532246 (Ananya Mahapatra, Student Co-ordinator)

Email: cwcr@gnlu.ac.in

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organiser

The National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) was established by Act 27 of 2005 of the Kerala State Legislature. By the same Act, the National Institute for Advanced Legal Studies (NIALS) established by the Bar Council of Kerala Trust in 2002 merged with the NUALS.

In 2008, an amendment streamlined the powers and functions of the authorities of the University and ensured the active involvement of the Government of Kerala.

About the Seminar

Research is an endeavor to discover the truth. It is a careful investigation and inquiry with an endeavor to find relevant facts, which will be useful in the future.

The purpose behind conducting research is to find solutions to a fundamental problem. If we have a quality research outcome, then it might lead to further improvements in society, directly or indirectly.

The basic aim and purpose of conducting research is to inculcate original thinking and analysis, but extensive copying and plagiarism counter such purpose. There is no shortcut to truth. Academic research is the foundation of innovative ideas.

Academic research is a tool for building knowledge and facilitating learning. Higher education is preparation for qualified researchers who would continuously develop the frontiers of knowledge.

Quality within this viewpoint is more about research publications and transmission of the academic rigour to do quality research. Not only does plagiarism act as detrimental for the field of scholarship but it has been found that this menace of plagiarism is prevalent among university students.

Thereby affecting them in numerous tangible and intangible ways. Plagiarism is also regarded unethical because when a researcher projects somebody else’s work as his own original work, it might be regarded as a kind of fraud. It hurts the intellectual property right of the original owner, depicts disrespect of the researcher towards his peers and questions the integrity and honesty of the researcher.

Therefore, the current seminar is an effort to enlighten the research scholars on research ethics and publication ethics.

The seminar will provide the scholars with an overview on how to up bring an original research work and to understand the core principles of ethical research. Thereby the participant would strive to become an ethical researcher and produce original quality research work.

Themes

The theme of the seminar is ‘Enhancing Research Integrity and Upholding Publication Ethics.’

Sub Themes

  • Research, Ethics and Academic Honesty
  • Ethics in research writing and conflict of interests
  • Intellectual honesty
  • Academic Integrity: Research Misconduct/Fabrication/Unethical Practices
  • Academic/Research: Falsification, Manipulation or Tampering of Data
  • Literature Review and Proper Use of E-Resources
  • Using Design thinking Methods to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Writing Quality Academic Publications: Challenges to avoid plagiarism
  • Modes of citation and Acknowledgment
  • Introduction to Reference Management Tools (RMT)
  • Plagiarism, types and modes to avoid it
  • Features and Functionalities of Anti-Plagiarism Software
  • Detection of Plagiarism by using Different Online Tools
  • Plagiarism Policies, Penalties and Consequences
  • Research metrics
  • Norms and rules governing prescriptive writing
  • Arrangement of content and structure of writing articles
  • Art of quoting judgements
  • Guide to legal citation
  • Citation of resources, articles, journals, reports etc

Eligibility

  • Seminar invites faculty members and researchers from Law and related disciplines such as Social Science, Management, and Economics etc. all over the globe to participate and/or present paper.
  • Researchers enrolled for LL.M/M.Phil. /Ph.D./PDF in a UGC recognized university/ foreign university/ deemed university/ colleges/ institutes of national importance or ICSSR Research institute can apply for the seminar.

Location

NUALS, Kochi

How to Submit?

  • Submissions are to be made in electronic form only and are to be sent to the mail id nualsripe2022@nuals.ac.in
  • The paper should be in English, not exceeding 3000-5000 words (including abstract and excluding footnotes).
  • The paper shall be submitted on or before 1st March, 2022.
  • Co-authorship is permitted to a maximum of two authors.
  • In case of co-authorship, each co-author should remit separate registration fee.
  • The cover page should include Name, Address, E-mail ID, Contact number and the name of the College/University/Firm along with the address of the author. A brief profile of the author not exceeding 250 words should be attached.
  • No part of the submission should have been published earlier nor should it be under consideration for publication or a contest elsewhere.
  • All contributions must represent original ideas and interpretations coupled with critical evaluation and assessment.
  • Any form of plagiarism will result in immediate disqualification.
  • Authors of the selected papers will be informed through mail.
  • Selected papers will be published in ISBN numbered book, participants will have to fill Form 2 consenting publication along with submission of full paper.
  • The mode of seminar is HYBRID.
  • The participants can participate and or present papers in virtual mode or in person.

Fee details

  • INR 500 for LL.M/M.Phil. /Ph.D./PDF participants opting for virtual mode.
  • INR 1000 for LL.M/M.Phil. /Ph.D./PDF participants opting in person.
  • INR 1000 for teachers/others opting for virtual mode.
  • INR 1500 for teachers/ others opting in person.

Payment mode will be intimated later.

Important Dates

  • Submission of full paper with abstract: 01-03-2022
  • Communication of status of full papers: 05-03-2022
  • Registration last date: 08-03-2022

Contact details

  • FACULTY ADVISOR
    Prof. (Dr.) Mini S.
    Director, Centre for Post Graduate Legal Studies
  • CO-ORDINATORS
    Fathima Ibrahim
    Doctoral Research Scholar, NUALS
    Email: fathimaibrahimphd@nuals.ac.in
    Ph. +91 9446276627
  • Vidyaprada K.S.
    Doctoral Research Scholar, NUALS
    Email: vidyapradaksphd@nuals.ac.in
    Ph. +91 8606934807

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Webinar and CfP

The Centre for Parliamentary Studies and Law Reforms, NUALS calls upon the legal professionals, academicians from other social science disciplines, administrators, university students, young and upcoming research scholars, social activists, and the representatives of governmental and non-governmental organizations to present their research papers for the webinar on the topic “Role of Local Self Government Bodies in India in Attaining Sustainable Development Goals-2030” on 21 & 22 March 2022.

Selected authors will be intimated and only those authors can make their presence online. All the selected papers will be published in a Book carrying ISBN. Papers selected for oral presentation will again be subjected to double-blind peer review before it is published in the Book carrying ISBN.

Concept Note

Considering the need for the development of our country, strengthening the capacity of Local Self- Government Bodies in the implementation of sustainable development goals 2030 is having great relevance. In this context, the Centre for Parliamentary Studies and Law Reforms, NUALS as the organizer of the webinar, calls upon the legal professionals, academicians from other social science disciplines, administrators, university students, young and upcoming research scholars, social activists, and the representatives of governmental and non-governmental organizations to present their research papers relevant to the below-mentioned themes.

General Details of the Event

  • Event Date: March 21, 2022; 10 AM to March 22, 2022, 5 PM
  • Organizer: Centre for Parliamentary Studies & Law Reforms

Sub – Themes 

Role of Local Self Bodies in India on:

  • Eradication of Poverty
  • Facilitating Development (Social Development)
  • Facilitating Industrial & Infrastructure Developments (Minor and Medium Projects)
  • Providing Free and Compulsory Education
  • Protecting the Rights of Women, Children and other Vulnerable Groups
  • Protection of Environment
  • Ensuring Sustainable Development
  • Preservation of Natural Resources like Water, Sand etc.
  • Waste Management including Electronic Waste Management
  • Economic Stability of Individuals
  • Social Welfare Schemes
  • Primary Health
  • Religious and Cultural Rights
  • Citizen’s Charter
  • Access to Justice
  • Grievance Redressal Mechanism, Local Self Government Tribunal etc.

*The above Sub Themes are not exhaustive

Submission Guidelines

  • Submissions are to be made in electronic form only and are to be sent to cpslrseminar2022@gmail.com
  • The paper should be in English, not exceeding 3000-5000 words (excluding footnotes).
  • The paper should be accompanied by an abstract not exceeding 350 words. Please limit keywords to 4. This shall not count towards the word limit.
  • Co-authorship is permitted to a maximum of two authors.
  • The cover page should include Name, Address, E-mail ID, Contact number, and the name of the College/University/Firm along with the address of the author/s. In the case of co-authorship, the cover page should include details of both authors. A brief profile of the author/s not exceeding 250 words should be attached with the abstract.
  • Kindly avoid the general and common information about the sub-theme of your paper as far as possible as doing so may result in duplication of information in the chapters coming under a single sub-theme.
  • No part of the submission should have been published earlier nor should it be under consideration for publication or a contest elsewhere.
  • All contributions must represent original ideas and interpretations coupled with critical evaluation and assessment.
  • All contributors have to produce a report regarding plagiarism, generated from any of the online plagiarism checker tool. Plagiarism level of the submission must be below 10%.
  • Full papers shall undergo Blind peer review and Plagiarism check.
  • Any form of plagiarism above the prescribed level will result in immediate disqualification. Such Plagiarised papers above the prescribed level shall be rejected.
  • Revision (if any) suggested by the reviewer of the paper shall be included. Revisions suggested are on the basis of blind peer review.
  • Full papers mailed to cpslrseminar2022@gmail.com will only be considered.
  • Status of the acceptance of full papers shall be communicated after blind peer review and plagiarism check. The registration details shall be informed with communication of acceptance.
  • Any queries regarding the book shall be addressed to cpslrseminar2022@gmail.com

Important Dates

  • Last date of Submission of Full papers: March 8, 2022
  • Communication of status of Full papers: March 13, 2022
  • Submission of revised papers (if needed): March 17, 2022
  • Registration: March 18-19, 2022
  • Date of Conference: March 21 & 22, 2022

Registration link

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe2JATpvfbxH2BfIICILMx7CtpZGri5XhJZy2dRgHSWK62iXA/viewform

Contact details

Email : cpslrseminar2022@gmail.com

1. Dr. Anil R. Nair
Associate Professor, NUALS
Director, The Centre for Parliamentary Studies and Law Reforms, NUALS
Mob: 9847183640,
Email: arn@nuals.ac.in

2. Dr. Vipin Das R.V.
Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, NUALS
Mob: 8113067224,
Email: vipindas@nuals.ac.in

3. A. Runcie Mathew
Doctoral Research Scholar, NUALS
Mob: 9447866992,
Email: runciemathew@nuals.ac.in

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About Sinhgad Law College

Sinhgad Law College is situated in the spacious location at Ambegaon (BK), STES Ambegaon Campus, Pune.

Sinhgad Law College was established in the year 2003 under the dynamic leadership of Prof. M. N. Navale The College offers a career in legal studies through 11.B (Three Years Course) and HALLB/BSLILBe years course).

About the Competition

The Moot Court Society organizes various regular activities to achieve these objectives The Society undertakes to educate and train the first-year students by organizing an augmentation program on the basics of mooting the environment of the College is conducive for students to acquire requisite skills and professional abilities.

The college has the privilege of hosting every year a very prestigious event Smt. Kashiba Navale National Moot Court Competition.

Eligibility

  • The Competition is open to all the Law Colleges / Law Schools and Institutes / Universities, Department of Law in India which are recognized by the Bar Council of India. The participation is open for all the students pursuing LL.B / B.A.LL B in the Three year Course and Five-Year Course respectively.
  • Each participating institution should send one team only. e) The team shall comprise of three members wherein two members shall act as speakers and one member will act as researcher.
  • Each team will be provided a team code within 24 hours of team registration. Teams should not disclose the identity of their institution: such disclosure shall invite penalties including disqualification. The decision for the same shall be at the discretion of the Organizers of this competition.
  • The substitution of any Team Member by other member is not allowed after the registration deadline is over, except in special circumstances and that too only with the permission of the Organizers.

Location

Sinhagad Law College Pune

How to Register?

  • The teams willing to participate are required to register for the Competition by filling a registration form and are requested to send the scanned copy to mcsslc2020@gmail.com on or before 25th February, 2022 (11:59 P.M. IST).
  • While filling the Registration Form, the teams have to choose a primary contact person from the team members. All communications concerning the Competition will be sent by an e-mail to this primary contact person nominated by the team. The nominated primary contact person shall be responsible to convey all the information regarding this competition to the team.
  • After submission of the Registration Form, an mail confirming the registration and payment will be sent to the primary contact person.
  • Maximum Thirty-two (32) teams shall be allowed to participate in the Competition, on the basis of first come-first serve basis. In case organizers receive more than 32 teams, then a memorial selection round shall take place, and the 32 teams scoring highest marks will be selected for the Oral rounds.
  • After the selection round of memorial, the 32 teams scoring highest marks will qualify for oral rounds. The teams who be eliminated will be given a refund of Rs. 1000/- (One Thousand Only) after the competition.

Fee Details

The participating team shall be required to make a payment of Rs. 2500/- (Rupees Two-Thousand and Five Hundred Only) as a Registration fee via Demand Draft (DD) only and shall be sent via post. Details of the same must be filled in the registration form.

The account details are:
Name of the Beneficiary: Sinhgad Law College
Bank Name: TJSB Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Branch: Deccan Gymkhana, Pune.

The DD shall be posted at the following address:

The Principal, Sinhgad Law College,
Sr. No. 10/1, Near Bank of Maharashtra,
Vadgaon Campus, Sinhgad Institute Road,
Ambegaon Bk., Pune, Maharashtra – 411041

Prizes

The following awards shall be awarded in the Competition:

i) BEST TEAM
WINNING TEAM – Cash Prize of Rs. 21,000/- & Certificate of Merit.

ii) RUNNERS UP
RUNNER-UP TEAM–Cash Prize of Rs.15,000/- & Certificate of Merit.

iii) BEST MEMORIAL
BEST MEMORIAL – Cash Prize of Rs. 5,000/- & Certificate of Merit

iv) BEST SPEAKER
BEST SPEAKER – Cash Prize of Rs. 5,000/- & Certificate of Merit.

v) BEST RESEARCHER
BEST RESEARCHER–Cash Prize of Rs.5,000/- & Certificate of Merit
All the participants will be provided with a Certificate of Participation.

Click here for the moot proposition.

Registration Deadline

Feb 25, 2022

Brochure

Contact details

  • Prof. Nitin Bhandare (Moot Court Coordinator)
    +91-9850648148
  • Prof. Manjusha Mudgalkar (Asst. Coordinator)
    +91-8668797088
  • Mr. Sahil Rathod (President)
    +91-9326897853
  • Ms. Tejal Bajaj (Vice- President)
    +91-9518384608

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

INTRODUCTION

Any claim made in the suit flows from the cause of action, and claims made must be with respect to the cause of action from which they derive. In Om Prakash Srivastava v. Union of India and Anr., the Supreme Court stated that “Cause of Action” refers to the conditions that constitute a violation of a right or an urgent cause for a reaction in a limited sense. Due to the facts or circumstances, several causes of action may arise in some situations. Contractual actions, statutory causes of action, and torts including assault, battery, invasion of privacy, and defamation are only a few examples.

CAUSE OF ACTION, SECTION 20, CPC

“Cause of Action” as defined by section 20 of the Civil Procedure Code of 1908, is any fact that must be proven in support of the right to obtain a judgment. The term Cause of Action is mentioned in the CPC in various places. Under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order II Rule 2, it is stated that a plaint must mention the cause of action if it is to be instituted as a suit. Order VII Rule 1 reaffirms the same. Further, Order I Rule 8 states in the explanation that the parties represented in the litigation do not have to have the same cause of action as the person representing them and Order II Rule 7 explains in detail whether an objection to misjoinder of the cause of action should be submitted before the matter appears in the suit if such a complaint is valued at that time.

As stated at the outset, a Cause of Action is not only an important part of a Civil Action, but it is also the cause for the civil suit’s existence. It establishes the disputed topic or the genuine nature of the parties’ relationship. If there is no cause of action, there will be no litigation. Although, inside the CPC, the cause of action has yet to be defined.

PURPOSE OF ORDER 7 RULE 11 OF CPC

Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC provides litigants with the option of seeking an independent and special remedy, allowing courts to dismiss a suit at the preliminary stage without recording evidence and proceeding to trial based on the evidence presented if they are satisfied that the action should be dismissed on any of the grounds outlined in this provision.

In the case of Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali1, the SC reviewed several precedents on the underlying goal of O7 R 11 while dealing with the appeal before it. The court would not allow protraction of the proceedings if no cause of action is disclosed in the plaint or if the suit is precluded by limitation. In this instance, it would be important to put an end to the phony litigation to avoid wasting more judicial time. It opined, citing Azhar Hussain v. Rajiv Gandhi2, that the main aim of conferring such powers under O7 R 11 is to ensure that useless and bound to prove futile litigation should not be allowed to consume the time of the courts and exercise the mind of the respondent.

The Supreme Court went on to say that while considering a motion to dismiss a plaint, courts should look at the plaint’s averments in light of the documents relied on to determine if they reveal a cause of action. In this regard, it was also stated that courts would have to disregard the defendant’s pleadings in the written statement and application for dismissal of the plaint on merit when making such a conclusion. As a result, the Supreme Court stated that when deciding any application submitted under O 7 R11, the courts should limit themselves to the plaint and not delve into the specific facts outlined in the written statement or even the O7 R 11 application.

CASE LAWS

Subodh Kumar Gupta v. Srikant Gupta and Ors.3
In this case, an agreement was composed in Bhilai for the dissolution of the partnership and distribution of partnership assets. The Supreme Court held that the agreement was void and had to be ignored at the threshold to save the time of the court and to safeguard the parties from any harm. Further, it held that Chandigarh Court had no jurisdiction to hear the suit as part of the cause of action that arose at Mandsaur.

Bloom Dekor Ltd. v. Subhash Himatlal Desai and Ors.4
According to the Supreme Court, the cause of action encompasses those circumstances that, if present, would enable the plaintiff to provide support for his entitlement to a court judgment. That is, a set of facts that the plaintiff will use to substantiate his or her case.

M/S South East Asia Shipping Co. Ltd. vs M/S Nav Bharat Enterprises Pvt.5
The Supreme Court ruled that a cause of action is made up of a group of circumstances that constitute grounds for bringing a civil action for redress in a court of law. In other words, it’s a series of circumstances that gives the plaintiff the right to sue the defendant under the legislation that applies to them. The court further stated that a cause of action must include any conduct committed by the defendant because, without one, no cause of action will likely develop.

Raghwendra Sharan Singh vs Ram Prasanna Singh6
In this case, the cause of action arose when the injured party disputed the gift deed after approximately 22 years from the date of the equivalent’s execution. The offended party in the situation has contested the gift deed, claiming that it is a garish one that is therefore not authoritative. After hearing both sides’ perspectives on the facts of the case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court ruled that the Statute of Limitations indisputably bars this lawsuit. Furthermore, the plaint should be dismissed according to CPC Order VII Rule 11.

Rajasthan High Court Advocates Association vs Union of India & Ors.7
In this case, the court held that every fact that must be proved, as opposed to any piece of evidence needed to prove each fact, must have been mentioned the essential element of ’cause of action’ according to the Rajasthan High Court. In each circumstance, the location of the cause of action must be determined.

As a result, the court will only be justified in dismissing the plaint for failure to disclose a cause of action if it considers the claims in the plaint and decides that they do not reveal any cause of action, assuming the allegations are true. However, if the court finds that there is no cause of action for the suit after reviewing all evidence and materials after the trial, the suit is dismissed rather than the plaint rejected.

OBSERVATIONS

The plaintiff’s lawsuit may be dismissed at the outset if the cause of action is not adequately established just like in the recent case. In such a case, no court proceedings will be continued in the first place to save the time of the court and to prevent such malice. Further, the claims must be backed up by facts, law, and a conclusion drawn from the law’s application to the facts.

A statement of facts in a battery case, for example, might be “While walking through XYZ Store, the plaintiff was tackled by the defendant, a store security guard, who knocked him to the ground and held him there by kneeling on her back and holding his arms behind him, while screaming in his ear to open his bag. The plaintiff suffered injuries to her head, chest, shoulders, neck, and back as a result of these actions.”

However, the facts or circumstances that lead to a person seeking judicial redress may give rise to multiple causes of action. In the previous case, the plaintiff could allege assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of Civil Rights.

CONCLUSION

As for this regulation, the term “cause of action” refers to the key facts that make up the right and its infringement, which authorizes a person to sue the wrongdoer, defaulter, or anyone else who is liable for it.

However, Rule 6 of Order II of CPC states that the court may order separate trials if it appears to the court that joining causes of action in one complaint will embarrass or delay the trial or be otherwise inconvenient. It can be analyzed from the above-stated matter that a lawsuit can be dismissed if the cause of action is missing from the complaint. It is not enough to just assert that specific events or facts occurred that entitle the plaintiff to relief; the complaint must also include all of the elements of each cause of action in detail. However, if an offended party excludes any relief to which he is entitled to suit except when approved by the Court, he will not be granted such assistance later. The Court may award aid on reasons other than those specified in the plaint in exceptional situations. The aid requested by the injured party or the defendant might be broad or narrow.

Citations:

  1. 2020 SCCOnline SC 562
  2. 1986 AIR 1253, 1986 SCR (2) 782
  3. (1993) 104 PLR 621
  4. 1994 SCC (6) 322, JT 1994 (6) 89
  5. 1996 SCC (3) 443, JT 1996 (3) 656
  6. AIR 2019 SC 1430
  7. AIR 2001 SC 416

Written by Hemant Bohra student at School of Law, Lovely Professional University, Punjab.

It is stated that accepting an offer is like lighting a match to a barrel of dynamite. For a contract to be successful, a genuine offer must be followed by acceptance of the offer. Let’s look at what defines genuine acceptance in more detail.

Acceptance

“The offer is considered to be accepted when the person to whom the proposition has been made gives his approval thereto,” reads Section 2 (b) of the Indian Contract Act 1872. As a result, the plan becomes a promise once it is authorized. Acceptance happens when the offeree to whom the proposition is made unconditionally accepts the offer, as indicated in the definition. When an offer like this is accepted, it becomes a promise.

Let’s imagine A makes an offer to buy B’s car for Rs. 2 lakhs, and B accepts. This has now become a commitment.

Once a proposal has been approved, it can no longer be amended. If accepted, an offer does not create any legal obligations, but it does create a promise. A promise is also irreversible since it creates legal obligations between parties. It’s possible that an offer will be revoked before it’s accepted. Once acceptance has been conveyed, it cannot be revoked or canceled.

Rules regarding Valid Acceptance

1. Only the person or persons to whom the offer is made and with whom it implies a contracting intention is allowed to accept it:
An offer may only be accepted by the person or persons to whom it is made and with whom it implies a contracting intention; it cannot be accepted by anyone else without the offeror’s permission.

The rule of law reads, “If you plan to create a contract with/1, then B cannot replace himself for A without your agreement.” An offer made to a single person can only be accepted by that individual. Any member of a group of individuals (for example, instructors) can accept an offer that is made to them. Anyone who is aware of the existence of an offer made to the entire world can accept it.

2. Acceptance must be unqualified and unconditional:
To be legally effective, it must be a complete and unqualified acceptance of all the conditions of the offer. If there is even the smallest deviation from the terms of the offer, the acceptance is annulled. A deviating acceptance is considered a counter-offer in the legal sense.

3. Acceptance must be communicated in a common and fair manner unless the proposal specifies how it should be accepted:
If the offeror does not indicate a method of acceptance, acceptance must be expressed in a common and fair manner. The most prevalent modes of communication are the word of mouth, mail, and behavior. An explicit acceptance is one that is expressed in words, either verbally or in writing, or by mail or telegram. When approval is expressed by behavior, it is known as implicit or tacit acceptance.

Implied acceptance can be proven by doing a necessary action, such as locating missing goods for the stated reward, or by accepting a benefit or service, such as a passenger boarding a public bus.

If the offeror specifies a form of acceptance, the acceptance offered in that style is absolutely admissible, even if the mode is funny. As a result, if the offeror specifies lighting a match as a method of acceptance and the offeree does the same, the acceptance is complete and effective.

However, what if the offeree opts for a method other than the one specified? “The proposer may, within a reasonable time after the acceptance is given to him, request that his proposal be accepted in the stated manner, and not otherwise; nevertheless, if he fails to do so, he accepts the (deviated) acceptance,” says Section 7(2).

Reality acceptance is ineffective:
Mental approval or quiet permission without words or activity does not establish legal acceptance, even if the offeror has stated that such a mode of acceptance will suffice. Otherwise, until the offeror is notified, acceptance has no effect.

4. Acknowledgment must be transmitted by the acceptor:
For an acceptance to be valid, it must be communicated to the offeror not just by the offeree, but also by or with the offeree’s authority (or acceptor).

5. Acceptance must be made in a fair amount of time before the offer expires or is revoked:
Because an offer cannot be kept open indefinitely, acceptance must be made within the given time limit, if any. Acceptance must be made within a reasonable time if no time restriction is specified (Shree Jay a Mahal Cooperative Housing Society versus Zenith Chemical Works Pvt. Ltd.).

Before the offer is revoked or expires owing to the offeree’s understanding of the offeror’s death or insanity, acceptance must be provided.

6. Acceptance must happen after the offer is made:
Acceptance must happen after the offer is made. It should come after, not before, the offer. A person was handed shares in a corporation that had not applied for them. He then applied for shares, completely unaware of the previous allocation. Prior to the application, the distribution of shares was deemed to be invalid.

7. Rejected offers may only be accepted if they are renewed:
If an offer has previously been rejected, it cannot be accepted again unless a fresh offer is made (Hyde vs Wrench).

Are There Different Kinds of Contract Acceptance?

Bill acceptances are divided into two categories: general acceptance and qualified acceptance. Absolute acceptance refers to wide approbation that is unqualified and unconditional. Acquiescence that is given without qualification is referred regarded as general acceptance. When someone accepts an order to pay a certain sum in whole and without limitations, this is known as a general acceptance. This is a common type of acceptance unless other payment
arrangements are made.

An acceptance must be wide in order to be legitimate as a general standard. When someone accepts an instrument, they qualify it by attaching a condition to it.

Acceptance can be divided into three categories:

  • Acceptance by the Empress
  • Acceptance is implied.
  • Acceptance on condition

While any of these methods of acceptance is appropriate, signing a formal contract ensures that there is a legally enforceable element in the event of a disagreement. Finally, acceptance involves expressing and affirming one’s agreement to the transaction.

Implied acceptance is defined as acceptance that is indicated indirectly, rather than directly, through the acts of the person to whom an offer is made. An example of implicit acceptance of a bidder’s offer to the auctioneer is the auctioneer striking his hammer three times to signify his approval of a bidder’s offer.

The word “express acceptance” refers to acceptance that is stated orally, in writing, or vocally. For instance, A may write B an email offering his watch for sale, and B could accept the offer.

Qualified Acceptance: Another phrase for conditional acceptance is qualified acceptance. This happens when the person who made the offer tells the person who made the offer that if the terms and conditions alter, or if something happens, he or she will accept the offer. A conditional acceptance is good when you’re not sure how your position will turn out or if there are elements that might modify your existing situation.

This can be used as a counteroffer as well. Before the contract may be made, the initial offeror must accept a counteroffer. It sets expectations for the offer’s acceptance. The most prevalent kinds of conditional acceptance are:

  • Qualified to place
  • Qualified to amount
  • Qualified to time
  • Acceptance by some only
  • Acceptance for installment payments

This is known as qualified to place when the drawee pays a bill at a certain location alone. It is referred to as qualified to amount if the drawee accepts the exchange and accepts payment for only a portion of what is owed. Qualified to time occurs when the drawee accepts the exchange and pays the bill at a period other than that stipulated in the contract.

When some, but not all, of the drawee’s consent to the transaction, it is referred to as acceptance by some. The bill is accepted for installment payments when the drawee agrees to pay the amount in installments. This must be mentioned explicitly in the contract from the beginning.

The acceptance requirement must be expressed very clearly in the agreement and must be quickly understood. If drawee desires to make a qualifier during acceptance, he or she must do it in such a way that the instrument’s holder knows what was accepted and on the basis of particular criteria.

Written by Muskan Patidar student at Kirit P. Mehta School of law (NMIMS), Mumbai.

About the Nestlé

Nestlé relationship with India dates back to 1912, when it began trading as The NESTLÉ Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company (Export) Limited, importing and selling finished products in the Indian market.

After India’s independence in 1947, the economic policies of the Indian Government emphasised the need for local production. NESTLÉ responded to India’s aspirations by forming a company in India and setting up its first factory in 1961 at Moga, Punjab, where the Government wanted NESTLÉ to develop the milk economy. Progress in Moga required the introduction of NESTLÉ’s Agricultural Services to educate, advise and help the farmer in a variety of aspects. From increasing the milk yield of their cows through improved dairy farming methods, to irrigation, scientific crop management practices and helping with the procurement of bank loans.

About the Internship 

The world is no stranger to the surging unemployment rate globally and the rate is higher among the youth. 1 in 6 Youth have stopped working since the onset of COVID 19. In India specifically, Unemployment rate @ Urban Area is still at 11.2% (CMIE). These developments are particularly detrimental to youth as their employment prospects, relative to older and experienced workers, are more sensitive to economic downturns.

Since the outbreak of COVID, the total NEET % for India has been rising beyond 30%. In order to protect youth of our country and to ensure that they do not lose opportunities to develop themselves, Nestlé India launched a virtual internship programme, “Nesternship” with an intent to equip 1000 students with the skills they need to thrive at workplaces and build their professional competence.

Internships are vital milestones in every student’s life and we want to do our bit amidst the challenging times by not only providing internships but by also allowing the young talent to have a fair chance in the labour market post undertaking internships. This shall primarily include graduates and post graduates and upskill them to create route to work in an effort to avert an unemployment crisis. This way help them find their place and contribute to more prosperous and stable societies.

The programme ‘Nesternships’ will definitely serve as a stepping stone for us as an organization towards one of our many responses to global crisis situations and we are hopeful that this programme shall collectively bring the best out of the current global crisis despite all odds.

Internships are available across multiple profiles such as Marketing, HR, Finance, IT, Quality, Food Technology, Production, Corporate affairs, and many more.

Nesternship 3.0

Nestlé India rolls out Nesternship 3.0 to enhance the competence and employability of the youth in India. This internship will offer experiential learning to empower you with skills and to make you future-ready. You will be assigned a mentor from Nestlé to guide you during the course of your internship.

Eligibility

  • Applicable to Indian Nationals only.
  • The internship is open to students from recognized Institutions and Universities with exposure to Competition
  • Students with a placement in hand are not eligible.

Duration of Internship

50 days

Registration/Submission Procedure

Students will be first shortlisted based on the strength of their application, and then the shortlisted candidates will be interviewed for the final selection.

Stipend

Rs. 10,000 for 50 day-internship

Perks

  • Internship with Nestlé: Upskill yourself by interning at the world’s largest food & beverage company.
  • Get a stipend of ₹10,000 and a prestigious internship completion certificate from Nestlé.
  • Participate in the contest and apply to internships before others. Also, win cash rewards up to ₹10,000.

Contact Details

Corporate Office
Nestlé India Ltd.
Nestlé House, Jacaranda Marg M Block
DLF City Phase II, National Highway 8
Gurgaon 122 002, India

Number of Interns Required

1000 

Link to Apply

https://lnkd.in/drXRhSpS?trk=public_post-embed_share-update_update-text

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organisation

Racolb Legal is a prominent legal research website with a core initiative to provide a platform for law students and professionals to write articles and to provide research assistance for all those who need it.

Now after completion of almost 6 years, Racolb Legal is looking for young and intelligent students or professionals to fill the most important position i.e. research associate.

Nature of Internship

Online internship

Eligibility

Students enrolled in any professional course.

Number of Interns Required

3 Interns

Location

Online

Stipend

Performance-based after 8 articles

Duration of Internship

1 – 2 Month(s)

Application Procedure

Interested candidates may apply on devashishjain[at]racolblegal.com with the subject of the email as ‘Application for Internship’ along with a well-researched writing sample of no less 1000 words on a topic of the applicants choice and if the candidate is selected the said article will be considered as his first out of four submissions that are required to be submitted.

Contact Details

devashishjain@racolblegal.com

Link for more details

http://racolblegal.com/blogse-commerce/

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on LexPeeps is true to our knowledge. But still it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GRdQLsHRwmB7QVRmS3WK

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd