NLSIU IP Center (CIPRA):

The IP Center of NLSIU, Bangalore – CIPRA (Center for Intellectual Property Research and Advocacy), has introduced an Online Internship policy in light of COVID-19.

About the internship:

Role of interns:

  • Interns have to attend a mandatory 30-minute lecture given by the Research Associate on any topic every day.
  • Interns will be provided with zoom links by the Research Associate. Interns are to co-ordinate with Ms. Sadhana for the links to such meetings and to contact any research associate if they wish.
  • The intern will have to write an original 1000-1200 word small article Each week to be vetted by any research associate for publication on the website (either of the two). The formatting of such articles will follow standard formatting rules and bluebook 20th edition footnoting format.
  • Interns have to make one presentation at the end of the month on any topic that they have worked on during the month.
  • completion of the internship would be only on the submission of four original pieces on any area of IPR.

How to apply:

Interns are required to send their CV and cover letter to cipra@nls.ac.in at least two weeks in advance for the Internship.

Duration of internship:

The internship will be of minimum 30 days.

Visit:

https://iprlawindia.org/remote-internship-policy/

Visit us for more opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About the Symbiosis law school:

Symbiosis Law School (SLS) Hyderabad was established in 2014 inheriting splendid novelty, dynamism and excellence in the education of Symbiosis International Deemed University, Pune.

About the Centre for Criminology and Criminal Justice (CCCJ):

Centre for Criminology and Criminal Justice (CCCJ), is one of the many centers of Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad that aims at specializing, tutoring, and disseminating information about the different facets of criminology, forensic science, penology, and victimology to its students.

About the Webinar:

The death of a father and son due to the alleged act of police brutality and custodial torture in Tamil Nadu has sparked rage across India. According to
NCRB, only 26 policemen were convicted of custodial violence despite 1,727
such deaths being recorded in India between 2001-2018. Police forces have
the authority to exercise force to enforce laws and maintain law and order in a state. However, this power may be misused in several ways. For example, in India, various kinds of complaints are made against the police including complaints of unwarranted arrests, unlawful searches, torture, and custodial rapes.
The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2007) has observed that
there is a need to have an independent complaints authority to inquire into
cases of police misconduct. The Supreme Court of India in Prakash Singh v. Union of India also ordered the Centre and states to set up authorities to lay down guidelines for police functioning, evaluate police performance, decide postings and transfers, and receive complaints of police misconduct. Yet, these and various other recommendations made across eight reports of the National Police Commission have not been implemented in the criminal justice system. The webinar “Reshaping Policing: A Legal Reformwill be focusing on the different steps by which reformation of the system to reduce this misuse of the powers by the authorities can be possible, as well as raise awareness on the same.

About the speaker:

Mr. Vibhuti Narain Rai, IPS. is going to be the guest speaker for the webinar. Mr. Vibhuti joined the Indian Police Service in 1975 and was awarded the Police Medal for Meritorious Services and President’s Police Medal for Distinguished Services during his career.

Besides being a distinguished police official Mr. Vibhuti is an acclaimed Hindi fiction writer and has published several novels to his name. Mr. Vibhuti is an activist who has been fighting fundamentalist and obscurantist forces for years. He has raised his voice and written boldly against the communal biases of Indian Police. Mr. Vibhuti was also the Vice-Chancellor of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya, Wardha.

The webinar is open for all. The webinar will be conducted online.

The event will be conducted on the 6th, November 2020 from 4:00 PM to 5:30 PM. The last day for registration is 5th, November 2020 at 11:59 PM. To register yourself please fill the form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfuWru3GEwWKzar_sysbNvJ-QQP39walaIE1dUklYp7iO5m8Q/viewform

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

About Upstox:

Upstox (RKSV Securities India Pvt. Ltd.) is one of India’s leading Discount Broking companies which enables investors and traders to trade in the Stock Market and Commodities exchange at a fraction of the market price with our state-of-the-art trading platform.

Position:

Assistant Manager – Legal

Location: 

Prabhadevi / Parel, Mumbai (Upstox)

Work & Responsibilities:

1. Vetting of NDAs, Service Agreements, MSA, Referral Agreement, and documents.

2. Act as a trusted advisor and deliver expert legal advice in relation to the laws and regulations governing financial services products, Stock Exchange.

3. To partner with the teams, delivering a best in class legal service that enables the business to deliver on their objectives, whilst effectively managing legal risk and ensuring good outcomes.

4. Proactively identifying and advising on legal and regulatory risks, escalating these as necessary to stakeholders, and assisting with recommending and implementing solutions, including in relation to the implementation of new legislation and regulatory requirements.

5. Provide input to new and existing policies and procedures to ensure that any changes to processes are within the permitted legal and regulatory framework.6.  Can be part of the Secretarial and Finance Team.

Upstox is looking for:

Upstox has a team of highly skilled technology and finance professionals and is currently looking for highly motivated field experts to be part of their high-energy team. 

1. Acts as a trusted advisor to business and other infrastructure areas- Builds strong risk partnerships with colleagues in other functions.

2. Add value in commercial as well as technical discussions.

3. Consistently delivers against a broad range of competing targets.

4. Proactively collaborates across different teams, can be part of the Secretarial / Finance Department and geographies both within.

5. Should have strong interpersonal skills and can be a team player.

Experience & Skills:

1. Qualified and enrolled lawyer, 5-7 years PQE, in a corporate and legal role, from similar NBFCs or Bank

2. Strong communication, influencing and negotiation skills.

3. Regulatory technical expertise in financial services

4. Project management – including advising and leading on the implementation of new laws of regulations

Apply here: https://jobs.lever.co/upstox/e8c9bf27-6252-4300-a612-1529b7079c14

Visit us for more opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

This article is written by Aanchal Rawat, a 2nd-year student of R.N. Patel Ipcowala School of Law and Justice. This article talks about what is tort, essential elements of the tort, history of tort and development of tort.

Suppose you went to vote but you were not allowed to vote by the officer assigned to make sure election is done properly. You were not allowed to vote without any reason even when you were a qualified voter. What will you do? Will you leave this matter and do nothing or will you do something? You should know right to vote is your right. You can go to court to ask for compensation for violation of right. When there is right then there is a remedy available for it. There has been no specific law which punishes for this offence. But as there is a legal injury there is a remedy available for it.

Tort

“Tort” is derived from the Latin word “Tortum” which means to twist or wrong. This term tort originated from the common law of England which means wrong.

Salmond has defined tort as follows:

“A tort is a civil wrong for which the remedy is an action for liquidated damages and which is not exclusively the breach of a contract, or the breach of a trust, or the breach of other merely equitable obligation.”

Winfield has defined tort as,

“Tortious Liability arises from the breach of a duty primarily fixed by law; this duty is towards persons generally and its breach is redressable by an action for unliquidated damages.”

Ratanlal and Dhirajlal has defined tort as,

“Tort is a civil wrong, independent of contract, for which appropriate remedy available damages.”

Essentials of Law of torts

1. Wrongful Act or Omission

Duty to do but not done is an omission.

An act which one is not supposed to do but he does is a wrongful act.

The wrongful act must be wrongful in the eyes of law. A moral wrongful act is not punishable.

2. Legal Damage

The damage should be such that the legal right of a person is violated. If there is no violation of right then there is no legal damage.

3. Legal remedy

      The remedy for such acts should be in form of unliquidated damages.

History of Law of Tort

The first time tort was used as a legal term was in the 1580s before it different words were used to define the same concept.[1]

1st case in which the term tort was used for the first time is Boulton v. Hardy. [1597, Cro.Eliz.547]

The law of torts originated from the common law of England. It has been developed as a branch of law in many commonwealth countries.

Till Mid-19th Century law of tort was not developed very much we can say it was underdeveloped.

In the 1860s the first American Treatise on tort was published. However, the subject of tort became particularly established in the 1880s when Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. wrote about it.

Development of Law of Tort

After Norman’s conquest of England, the legal system becomes disorganized so judgements were carried out on a case by case basis more or less. After 1066, to understand the laws of the village which have developed over two centuries, judges wee delegated a region to travel there and understand their law. At that time the judges which were delegated this work noted and implemented those laws which they thought were most fair-minded and used them in their court findings. These court findings are known called as legal precedents. These precedents were meant to apply equally to the people of society whether it was a lord or a serf.

Due to Norman’s Conquest in England French became the spoken language in England’s Judiciary and thus many technical terms are originated from French language and tort is one of them. The term tort was based on the idea that everyone has certain rights in society. The purpose of tort was to enforce those rights and duties in society.

As precedent was meant to apply equally to everyone in society it was termed as common law.

The law of Torts came to India from England.

Important Case Laws which Developed Tort law in India

M.C Mehta v. Union of India

 In this case, the court applied the concept of Absolute liability and held the accused responsible. The principle of absolute liability was taken from the English case Rylands v. Fletcher in that the court held that when a person who for his own purpose brings anything in his land or collects or keeps which is dangerous and if it escapes then the person who brought it will be prima facie liable for the damages which are the natural consequences for its escape.

Similarly, in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, Shree Ram Fertilizers were held responsible for the damage which happened due to the leak of oleum gas to society.

Jai Laxmi Salt Works Ltd. v. the State of Gujarat

In this case, the court talked about the duty of care and the causation of tort. In the case, the Government of Gujarat had constructed a bundh on the land which involved the risk of change in the course of water. Due to a change in the flow of water nearby properties would be flooded and damaged. So, the Owner of Laxmi Salt Works wrote to Government a letter explaining this matter and asked for a change of location but the Government rejected his request. And afterwards due to heavy rainfall, the claimant’s factory was destroyed. He asked for compensation from the Government. However, the Government refused to pay compensation. Then the Claimant went to court for compensation. The trial court dismissed the case based on Act of God. The High Court held that since the suit was time-barred the respondents will not be liable. However, when the case went in Supreme Court the court held that the damage done to claimant’s factory was not Act of God and the State must care towards the citizens. The court held the State guilty for breaching its public duty and the claimant was awarded compensation.

[1] Bruce R. O’Brien, “Anglo-Saxon Law”, in The Oxford International Encyclopaedia of Legal History, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009), 179.

Latest Posts


Archives