About CLPR

The Centre for Law and Policy Research, Bangalore (CLPR) is a not-for-profit organisation, dedicated to making the Constitution work for everyone through law and policy research, social and governance interventions and strategic litigation.

About the Role

Position: Litigation Associate

Duration: Full time

Location: Bangalore

Responsibilities

  • As a Litigator at CLPR, you will be required to work on constitutional law cases relating to their focus areas of gender and caste-based discrimination, disability law and transgender rights.
  • Draft writ petitions, appeals, applications and other pleadings.
  • Brief and assist senior advocates at CLPR.
  • Appear in the High Courts and Supreme Court.
  • Carry out research for the cases.

Eligibility

  • Undergraduate degree in law and enrolled with the Bar Council.
  • Master’s degree in law (preferred).
  • Exceptional research, drafting and writing skills.
  • 2-3 years of experience in litigation in the High Courts or Supreme Court.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may send two writing samples, a statement of purpose along with their updated CV to jayna.kothari@clpr.org.in.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About Kanooni Salah

Kanooni Salah is a Delhi-based fully independent litigation law firm dedicated to legal services. Their law firm has a versatile and efficient team of advocates/lawyers who are specially trained and have distinguished experience in their own specific area of law. Their team of advocates is divided into four tiers viz. trial court team, high court team, supreme court team, and back-office team. The back office team provides pleading and drafting services at every level to our clients. Their team believes that in the context of the present world economic order, the legal profession plays a more valuable and constructive role than ever before.

The changes in the economic climate in the world especially in India have brought about a change in the traditional role of the lawyer.

About the Internship

The selected intern’s day-to-day responsibilities include:

  • Work on law research & drafting
  • Assist with court work
  • No. of Position(s): 3

They are looking for a person who wants to learn some serious litigation skills.

Eligibility

  • Mode: offline/in-office
  • can start the internship immediately
  • duration: 2 months
  • have relevant skills and interests

How to Apply?

APPLY HERE

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

-Report by Avinash Pandey

Copyright infringement (also known as illegal downloading) is the use of certain information or creation, without the permission of the owner, where authorization of the owner of the information is considered necessary. In simple words, it is encroaching upon such unique privileges given to the copyright owner, including the right to reproduce, disseminate, showcase, or undertake the copyrighted material, or to prepare derivative works.

SONY PICTURES NETWORK INDIA Pvt. Ltd. Vs WWW.sportssala.tv and Ors

Sony Studios filed a federal lawsuit against a number of individuals in this matter, chiefly seeking a permanent injunction against reproducing, making accessible, publishing, streaming, etc, sports events of India’s games. Even during the course of litigation, Sony Studios sought an interlocutory order and sought comparable remedies. The Judge issued Sony Studios an order prohibiting webpages, encompassing redirection, clones, and alpha-numeric variants. A restraining order also was issued targeting rogue websites that replicate, transmit, give access, transmit to the community, or redistribute sports events.

The Tribunal also issued an order directing ISPs to prohibit the aforementioned and other pirate networks, as well as directing the Government of India to issue suitable orders to minimize violation of Sony Pictures’ copyrights during the events.

The preliminary injunction also applied to MSOs and broadband providers, and regional inspectors were established to oversee and enforce the Court’s instructions. The Judge’s rulings principally encompass Sony Pictures’ copyrights, and so by inference allow only reasonable usage of the material related to the cricket matches involving India and England/Sri Lanka.

KNIT PRO INTERNATIONAL Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

In this instance, the appellant submitted an application with the chief metropolitan magistrate for the lodging of charges against the defendant for violations of Sections 51, 63, and 64 of the Copyright Act, as well as Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the petition, instructions were given to the competent officer to record the FIR in accordance with the applicable legal regulations. Following that, the defendant filed a writ petition with the Delhi High Court, requesting that the court proceedings be quashed, primarily on the grounds that the infraction under Section 63 of the Copyright Act would not be cognizable or bailable crime. The High Court allowed the writ petition and ordered the costs to be recorded against the plaintiffs.

Afterward, the appellant decided to contend this in front of the apex court and stated that the High Court had committed a huge mistake by observing that the offence punishable under section 63 of the Copyright Act is a non-cognizable offense and it is not part of the first schedule of the Cr.P.C. The respondent however contended that the decision of the High Court was correct and the offence under section 63 of the Copyright Act is indeed considered a non-cognizable offence.

The main issue that was raised here was whether section 63 of the Copyright Act and the offence committed by violating it is a cognizable offence or a non-cognizable offence. At the same time reference was made to the High court’s decision on whether section 63 of the Copyright Act can be considered a part of the first schedule of the Cr.P.C. The apex court in its judgment had explained section 63 of the Copyright Act and it provides for the punishment that is awarded to any person who had violated the said section.

In its final judgment, the Supreme Court held that section 63 of the Copyright Act is indeed a cognizable and non-bailable offence and therefore the judgment and the order passed by the High Court are contrary to the views of the Supreme Court. The order was set aside and the Supreme Court ordered the criminal proceedings to start against the respondents in this case for the violation of section 63 and section 64 of the Copyright Act in accordance with the law by treating them as cognizable and non-bailable offences.

The Supreme Court judge, Justice Mukeshkumar Rasikbhai Shah was in Himachal Pradesh. He was there for a religious trip. According to reports he suffered from a heart attack and then was rushed to Delhi.

He has said through a video that he is fine by God’s grace. The authorities of the Supre Court such as Justice N.V.Ramanna are communicating with him.

Initially, he was an advocate who had enrolled in the Bar Council in 1982. He went on to practice at the Gujarat High Court. He is a specialist in land, constitutional, Education, Excise, and Custom matters.

His journey as a judge started when he was appointed as the additional judge of the Gujarat High Court in 2004. Within a year he was made permanent. After being at the Gujarat High Court for 13 years, in 2018 he was appointed as the Chief Justice of Patna High Court.

In November 2018 after exercising his responsibilities as CJI of the Patna High Court, he was appointed as a Supreme Court Judge. To date, he has delivered about 100 judgments, mostly on criminal matters.

We wish him a speedy recovery.