Tag: #BombayHighCourt

General American Insurance Co. v. Madanlal Sonulal

Case Number 158 Ind Cas 554 Equivalent Citation (1935) 37 BOMLR 461 Bench The Bombay High Court Decided On 12.03.1935 Relevant Act / Section The Indian Contract Act, 1872 The...

The employer is not to believe that the suppression per se and ipso facto requires termination of employment

-Report by Jay Prakash Chandravanshi This case pertains to the appointment of a Peon on the sympathetic ground after his father died in harness. The petitioner challenged his termination by Maharashtra state electricity Distribution Company Limited...

THE PETITION SHOULD BE DISMISSED IF NO SUBSTANCE IN THE CHALLENGE WAS RAISED IN THE PETITION

-Report by Sejal Jethva In Suraj VS the State of Maharashtra Home Department (Special), the petitioner filed a writ petition alleging that a total of seven violations were committed between the years of 2013...

POWER OF THE HIGH COURT TO GRANT INTEREST ON LAND ACQUIRED BY THE GOVERNMENT UNDER ARTICLE 226

-Report by Moksh Kapoor Interest was granted to the petitioners in the case of ROSHANBI AZIZ MOTIWALA THROUGH POA MR. ILIYAS AZIZ MOTIWALA AND ORS. Vs THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND...

CHILD CUSTODY IS DETERMINED BY THE CHILD’S BEST INTERESTS

-Report by Sejal Jethva In this case, the custody of two children—who should live with their mother or father—is being settled between SALIM YOUSUF JAMADAR VS RESHMA SALIM JAMADAR FACTS:...

LEGAL BATTLE OVER UNDERVALUED GIFT DEED OF AGRICULTURAL LAND TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION

-Report by Karan Gautum Heard Ganesh Datt Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.N. Pathak, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents. FACTS The petitioner is an educational institution...

EXEMPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TAX, NEITHER PETITIONER IS ALLOWED TO RETAIN MONEY NOR STATE

-Report by Sejal Jethva In the present case MINAKSHI CHITRA MANDIR SAILU THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SANJAY PRABHAKAR RAJURKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR based on that petitioner is exempt from entertainment tax...

The law cannot be used as a tool to Harass people’s Bombay High Court to Police in its latest verdict

-Report by Tannu Dahiya Bombay High Court while hearing the petition on 27th February 2023 in the case Sandeep Arjun Kudale v. State of Maharashtra directed the police to carefully...

INTEREST EXPENSE CANNOT BE DISALLOWED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES: BOMBAY HC

–Report by Shreya Gupta In any circumstances, the interest expense cannot be denied u/s14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the IT Act. The disallowance made by adopting Rule 8D is not only opposed...

RESTORATION OF GST REGISTRATION NUMBER

–Report by Mushkan Vasani High Court Of Bombay at Aurangabad Bench while hearing the writ petition on 16th February 2023 in the case of Rohit Enterprises (Reg. no. 27AHQPD2485F1Z7) Through...