This case analysis is made by Bhavna Arul, a fourth-year law student from Symbiosis Law School. Case Number Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 1955 Judges Vivian Bose, B. Jagannadhadas and Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha, JJ. Decided on 7/10/1955 Citation AIR 1956 SC 171 / 1956 Cri LJ 338 Facts The two appellants and the deceased haveRead More
Case Number 184 Citation AIR 2004 SC 184 Bench R.C. Lahoti, Ashok Bhanu Decided on 29 August, 2003 Relevant Act/Section Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Brief Facts of the Case In this particular case, the appellant had a savings bank account with the respondent bank. After few days, the appellant found outRead More
This case analysis is written by Niti Shah studying BLS/LLB from Pravin Gandhi College of Law, University of Mumbai. Case Number 28 January 2000 Equivalent Citation 2000- 2 SCC 465 Petitioner The Chairman, Railway Board & Others. Respondent Mrs. Chandrima Das & Others. Bench R.P. Sethi, S. Saghir Ahmad Relevant Act/ Section Article 226 BriefRead More
This case analysis is Written by Akanksha Chowdhury from Amity University, Kolkata. Case Number 243 Citation: 1994 SCC (1) 243 Bench Sahai, R.M. (J) Decided on 5th November, 1993 Relevant Act/Section Section 21, 16 and 11 and 2(C) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Brief Facts of the Case This case is basically vested onRead More
This case analysis is written by Shivani Kumari, a student of Lloyd law college, Greater Noida. Case Number Civil Appeal Number 91 of 1972. Equivalent Citation 1 SCC 118″, 1986 AIR 411 Bench D.P. MADON G. L. OZA Decided on 29th November 1985 Relevant Act/ Section Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 order XXII RulesRead More
This article is written by Anushka Singh, a second-year student, pursuing BBA-LLB at Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University. This article examines the case of Laxmi Engineering Works v. PSG Industrial Institute (1995). This case was a landmark judgement on Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 50 of 1993 (replacing Ordinance 24 of 1993) with effect fromRead More
This article is written by Anushka Singh, a second-year student, pursuing BBA-LLB at Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University. This article analyses the case of Rustom K. Karanjia v. KMD Thackersey (1970), a case of libel (defamation). INTRODUCTION This is a case of defamation under tort law. The plaintiff, a businessman alleged that the articleRead More
This case analysis is writte by Akshat Mehta, a student of the Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad. In this case, he has tried to show how the concept of ‘Strict Liability’ is interpreted in certain conditions depending upon the place and circumstances. INTRODUCTION Any person could not be made strictly liable if his/her actRead More
Case Number Civil Appeals No. 688 of 1993 with No. 689 of 1993, W.P (C) No. 16 of 1994, C. As Nos. 4664-65 and 254 of 1994, 10039, 10081 and 10052-80 of 1995, decided on Nov 13, 1995 Equivalent Citation 1996 AIR 550, 1995 SCC (6) 651 Bench Justices Kuldip Singh, S.C. Agrawal, B.L. Hansaria,Read More
This case is critically analyzed by Akshat Mehta, a student of Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad. In this case, he tried to highlight where the exception of strict liability also fails and parties are liable so as in absolute liability. INTRODUCTION An exception of “Act of a Stranger” is available or not in the caseRead More
Lexpeeps Pvt Ltd provides tailored legal and business solutions, empowering businesses, startups, and professionals with innovative, comprehensive support and cutting-edge services for over half a decade.
© Copyright 2024 Lexpeeps All Rights Reserved | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy