Tag: #lawyers

INTRODUCTION:

Bar and Bench are two different elements with a common objective of administering justice in society. Bar, the term finds its origin in England, was used to differentiate a group of lawyers from a group of court officers. It is a group of lawyers enrolled with the state bar council who have permission to practice the profession in court. In simple terms, Bar is a place where lawyers take their place in a courtroom. The Bench is a place where judges take their seats in the courtroom. It is applied to differentiate between judges and attorneys.

BAR:

It is an association of lawyers established with the meaning to promote professional ability, enforcement of standards to ethical conduct, the encouragement of the spirit of public service among the members who practice the legal profession. In India, Bar Council was established as a statutory body under the Advocates Act,1961 aiming to regulate legal education and the legal profession. Its members are the lawyers from India and prescribe the qualifications, duties, etiquette, discipline, and conduct of lawyers.

BENCH:

A place where justice is administered by either judge or judges of the court. Bench could be in court or tribunal. The bench where the judge sits should showcase the position’s respect and dignity.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BAR AND BENCH:

Bar provides the foundation for the stability towards the independence of the judiciary. Bench reflects its action carefully as it is a senior figure to lower rank judicial officers who learn from it. Bar and Bench are two sides of the judiciary that works together to deliver justice in society and ensure no delay in justice due to adjournments of hearing. An advocate who outraged the court by removing the foundation of the court, such an act of an advocate only results in dishonouring the system for justice administration. An advocate must respect the honour and dignity of the Bench. A judge must perform his duties fairly, non-bias, are held liable for their judgments in the court of law. In L.M. Das v. Advocate General Orrisa¹ believed that advocates play an important role in the practice of achieving justice. In another case of the Madras High court, it was held that to administer justice it is essential to have Bar.²

The relationship between bar and bench must not act as a hindrance to the administration of justice, in the case of P.D. Gupta v. Ram Murthi and others³, Shri Krishna Das had died leaving immovable property that led to disputes. Among all those who claimed the property, there was a woman named Vidyawati. The lawyer of Vidyawati purchased the property and later on sold it to a third party. A complaint was made against the lawyer in Delhi Bar Council as the lawyer was enrolled in Delhi. Court held that any complaint made before the disciplinary committee must be resolved within a year and the Bar Council of India later enquired into the case and resultantly expelled him for a year. Before practicing any other right given to Bar by law the advocate practice the Right to be heard in courts to perform its role play in case.⁴

Roles played by Bar and Bench go hand in hand. The profession of Bar and Bench is the ultimate result of legal education. Those who belong to Bench are those who used to be part of the bar at one time. The mutual agreement of Bar and Bench helps in the administration of justice in society.

HOW ‘BENCH’ CAN STRENGTHEN RELATIONS WITH ‘BAR’?

The judicial system of state must be:

1. The judge must hear both the parties before deciding the case. Enough opportunity must be given to both sides to represent their case.
2. Judge shall not be impartial while giving his judgment.
3. Judges shall interfere in proceedings to keep a check of relevancy of facts, receiving clarification on arguments.  
4. Judges must interpret the laws, acts, orders, and rules, that are in question to remove the inconsistency of provisions.
5. Cases must not be adjourned for a longer duration of time and must have sufficient reason for any adjournment.
6. Disposition of case should be done at the earliest if possible.
7. Maintaining the independence of the judiciary.
8. The meetings must be held among judges and advocates presenting the case so that the difficulty faced can be resolved.
9. The changes in the legal world must be known by the judge.

HOW ‘BAR’ CAN STRENGTHEN RELATIONS WITH ‘BENCH’?

1. Respect must be shown towards the courts and judges.
2. Steps must be taken by advocates to ensure the avoidance of unfair practices by their clients.
3. Advocates must not influence the judgments of courts.
4. Advocates shall present the case with a clear mention of the laws involved and relevant case laws.
5. Advocates must present facts before the court, not those which molded to be shown as truth.
6. Advocate must not present a case before the judge to who he is personally related.
7. Advocate must not be involved in any case based on their financial interest.
8. Advocate shall not represent any case that may have a personal influence.

CONTEMPT OF COURT:

Supreme Court bench believed the cordial relations between bar and bench are a necessity so that the process of delivering justice in society could run smoothly. Lack of good relationship between bar and bench leads to slowing the process of administering justice and justice delayed is justice denied. The process in which justice is administered affects both bar and bench equally. The key to the stability of the relationship between bar and bench is respect towards each other. Both must support each other during difficulty. Being at bar is a prior step to becoming a judge. Every judge was once a lawyer.  They both are the product of the same legal system just superiority varies. Sometimes, due to the severity of the case or facts, issues the conversation may turn into a heated and harsh debate.

The harsh approach by lawyers sometimes may lead to harm the very foundation that laid justice. It’s like disrespecting the system itself. An advocate must keep his/her personal opinion regarding anything to himself/herself and must act within the boundaries provided by law. Being at a higher position doesn’t give them the right to degrade the lower-class judicial officers or the members of the bar. An act of disrespecting the conduct either by a judge or by lawyer amounts to contempt of court. For instance, the use of language that implicates insult against a judge or conceives him/her with his removal and transferring to another area challenging the authority of the judge and defaming him/her in any manner is a punishable offense under the act and must be held liable under the appropriate section.

Contempt of court is governed under the Contempt of Court Act,1971 aiming at types of contempt of court and punishment for the act of contempt of court. In the case of Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India, the court punished the lawyer by suspending his license to practice the profession for a specified period. Civil Contempt as defined under the act states wilful disobedience of any court order or decree or judgment. Criminal Contempt as defined under the act, states the publication of any material defaming the conduct of courts or judges, or any obstruction in the administration of justice.

Rachita Taneja⁵ was a cartoonist who was accused of posting objectionable cartoons of the Supreme Court. It was held that if in the eyes of the accused his action was of fair criticism that still does not mean they have the authority to contempt the court. Prashant Bhushan⁶ the senior advocate published two tweets claiming the denial of fundamental rights to citizens by keeping Supreme Court in lockdown and another tweet states that Supreme Court destructed the functioning of democracy. This too was met with heavy criticism.

CONCLUSION:

The relationship between Bar and the bench hasn’t developed fully since the introduction of democracy in Indian society. They both have mutual responsibility toward society to administer justice fairly. There must be a system of adjustment between both the elements of justice. Both the elements must function together to enhance their relationship in a better way. Both must uphold the basics of a free and independent judiciary. They must ensure the absence of impartiality, rule of law must be present to guarantee the independence of the judiciary from the state’s control.

Nowadays, the problem is that every day 5 to 6 letters were filed for adjourning of hearings on the ground of personal difficulty, this frequent adjournment is a matter of concern for both Bar and Bench. Lawyers must come thoroughly prepared for the presentation of the case so that there would no delay in process of justice delivery. Similarly, Judges must ensure to take much of the information so that there must be no hurdles in process of justice delivery. To attain justice in society both parties must play their part efficiently and cautiously. The bar must always be independent, responsible, and potent, to perform its function effectively so that the independence of the judiciary is maintained. If there must exist good relations between bar and bench, the high expense at the cost can be very much reduced.

---

CITATIONS:

1 1957 AIR 250.

² 1966 2 MLJ 219.

³ 1998 AIR SC 283.

⁴ 1943 AIR Lahore 14.

⁵ 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1042.

⁶ 2020 SCC OnLine SC 588.

This article is written by Simran Gulia pursuing BA LLB from Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies.

About the Organisation

Having the ability to handle matters both domestically and internationally, Sagar Chandra & Associates is a boutique intellectual property law practise. The partners of the firm, which was founded in 2009, each have more than 15 years of experience in the area of intellectual property rights.The Firm offers innovative, realistic, and commercially focused solutions for both contentious and non-contentious issues involving intellectual property. Both contentious and non-contentious matters including trademarks, copyrights, patents, designs, geographic indications, domain names, trade secrets, unfair competition, and media and entertainment laws are included in the firm’s practise areas.The two partners of Sagar Chandra & Associates, Sagar and Ishani Chandra, both have more than 15 years of experience working in the field of intellectual property.

About the Responsibilities  

Intellectual property rights would be your field of practise, at IPR Prosecution Department.

Location

B-18, Lower Ground Floor, Soami Nagar, New Delhi – 110017.

Eligibility

• PQE: 3+ years.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may apply from here:- career@scalegal.in with the subject line ‘Job Application (Prosecution) – Your name [PQE]’.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Gender diversity widens the range of skills and backgrounds available to handle specific legal difficulties in any professional situation. Diversity serves a greater function in the legal profession: it lends legitimacy to the impression that the law system is equal and just, and that everyone’s views are represented and acknowledged within it.

INTRODUCTION

Lawyers (also known as advocates, barristers, attorneys, solicitors, or legal counselors), paralegals, legal scholars (including feminist legal theorists), prosecutors (also known as Crown Prosecutors or District Attorneys), judges, law professors, and law school deans are among the women who work in the legal profession.

In recent years, the importance of women in professional fields has been emphasized in order for the economy and society to reach their full potential. Gender equality became a standard for development and prosperity around the world. Women have shown themselves and are leading the way in their drive for financial independence, equal rights, and opportunity in a variety of sectors.

In India, an increasing number of women are graduating with a law degree, despite the fact that few appear to pursue the field after a short – term at a law firm. Many women leave the field because of gender prejudice and seek work in fields that are more tolerant of women. Nonetheless, there are success stories in the country’s legal profession, where women have indeed been tenacious and stubborn in attaining their goals and becoming respected professionals despite all odds.

INDIA

In India, men have long dominated the legal profession. Women’s admittance into the courts was only possible after long and drawn-out legal fights, but even then, female participation in the courts was minor until the late twentieth century. However, in the twenty-first century, the concept of globalization has created greater chances for Indian women in law education and training. Modernism has also tempered the courtroom environment but has also put a stop to medieval masculine chauvinism in the field.

In independent India, the Indian Constitution guaranteed citizens the right to equality including protection from discrimination based on gender in getting an education or practicing whatever career of their choosing. Despite this privilege, the legal profession has not become a common choice for women, primarily because women must have a basic degree of education in order to be informed of these rights. And for a female population that was largely illiterate due to a variety of factors including poverty, restrictive social customs, strict caste restrictions, cultural practices prohibiting women from working outside their homes, and so on, higher education and pursuing a profession were dreams that the Independence era had managed to ignite, even if only in the shape of an awareness of being a downtrodden and suppressed part of the society largely contributing to the country’s development. Interestingly, in Western nations where the journey and naval enterprise had brought about tremendous change in housing conditions, in which feminism and modern feminist movements were started by educated women, and which nations had such a literate female population, at the very least, women entered the legal profession in 1917. By the 1860s, the British had created schools, colleges, even universities for women in India, but many women couldn’t even imagine going to school or graduating until the 1920s. Though a few fortunate educated women, including doctors and authors, earned notoriety in the feminist movements of the time, it is clear that they faced a new foe in the European and British feminists that opted to define and, by definition, silence them. It became critical for them (educated Indian women, that is) to understand how and where to empower themselves in order to prevent continued oppression.

PROGRESS

As a result, the women of India set out to cross a gulf that was bigger than that which their western counterparts had set out to cross. In such a diversified country like India, the arduous process of expanding literacy and raising awareness of women’s rights took a solid twenty years. Meanwhile, even the Indian judiciary was proactive in encouraging women to enter the legal profession, appointing the very first woman judge to the Kerala High Court, Hon’ble Justice Anna Chandy. Justice Anna Chandy began her legal career as an advocate in 1929 and was promoted to Munsiff in 1937, making her the very first woman judge in pre-independence India.

During these two decades, two distinguished lawyers, Hon’ble Justice Fathima Beevi Honble and Hon’ble Justice Leila Seth, joined the legal profession and went on to become Chief Justices of the Himachal Pradesh and Kerala High Courts, respectively. For more than 15 years, the first had been an active practicing lawyer in the Delhi, Kolkata, and Patna High Courts, while the latter had climbed from the post of Munsiff to eventually retire as a Supreme Court Judge. Surprisingly, women’s representation in the judiciary has not increased significantly compared to the original number of female judges. The situation has deteriorated to the point where a demand for a 33 percent reservation for women in the judicial system has been made in order to achieve parity in the number of male and female judges.

WOMEN IN LAW

Journalism, academia, and medicine were among the first occupations to be influenced by feminism. In later years, feminism began to have an impact on professions previously controlled by men, such as surgery, civil service, law, management, entrepreneurship, and politics.

In recent years, every family, especially those from the orthodox, backward, and traditional sectors, has been under severe economic strain. The battle is no longer focused on external challenges. In addition, public opinion is no longer antagonistic, and women now have a plethora of options. Psychological issues and the tussle between family and job, on the other hand, persist throughout their lives.

Women’s admittance into and increasing participation in the legal industry has become one of the most notable societal transformations in recent times, often referred to as “revolutionary. This inflow of women has sparked a lot of discussion among scholars and political activists concerning the changes that women will bring to the structure and management of substantive law, and also the manner law is practiced. India was a British colony until 1947, and the British modified the administrative structure and organizations as they saw fit. The Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Criminal Penal Code (Cr PC), and the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), as well as the foundation of the Rule of Law and the Indian Civil Services, are just a few examples.

For the first time in India, Dr. Hari Sigh Gaur, a pioneer in the struggle for women’s admittance into the legal profession, moved the following amendment to the Central Legislative Assembly of India’s resolution to abolish the sex disqualification against women.

REPRESENTATION NEEDED

Women are increasingly represented in the legal profession around the world, but their success varies greatly by culture and country.

Women began to flood into the legal industry globally in the 2000s, per a 2013 report of 86 countries (covering 80% of the world’s population). Women’s representation in the law is lowest in India and China, while it is highest in the former Soviet Bloc countries, Latin America, and Europe.

According to the survey, 52 countries had greater than 30% representation among employed lawyers, which is considered a significant societal shift. Venezuela and Uruguay were early adopters, exceeding the threshold in the early 1980s. Women made up at least 50% of lawyers in Bulgaria, Latvia, Poland, and Romania by the mid-to-late 2000s—some of the greatest participation in the world—while Denmark, Norway, the United States, and Germany, were latecomers, crossing the 30% threshold at the same time. Meanwhile, the world’s two biggest countries are among the slowest to incorporate women: India has a 5% female representation in the practice of law, while China has a 20% female representation.

In 2021, CJI Ramana confessed that the legal profession has yet to accept women into its fold, as the bulk of them struggle inside the profession, during a valedictory ceremony sorted by the Bar Council of India (BCI).
“Following 75 years of freedom, one would expect to see at least 50% female representation at any and all levels, but I’m afraid I have to say that we’ve only managed to get to 11% female representation on the Supreme Court bench. Because of the reserve policy, some states may have a higher representation. However, the reality is that the law must continue to embrace women into its ranks “The Chief Justice stated.

Many law companies are also biased against women for the same reasons: she may take time off to raise a family, she cannot be entrusted with “serious” briefs, and if she requires a while off to start families, she is perceived as less capable and devoted. When a woman re-enters the workforce, she is frequently at a disadvantage.

Increasing women judges don’t really inevitably contribute to better results for women’s causes, according to a feminist judgment study conducted in the United Kingdom in 2010. However, if the judge has been a feminist, the story would be different, and the outcome would be different in many circumstances. As a result, India requires not only more female judges but also more gender-sensitive judges.

Women are likewise pressured to do better than their male counterparts, and women lawyers or judges who struggle to get their views heard are frequently referred to as aggressive. However, in male legal practitioners, this feature is viewed as a strength. Then there’s the issue of workplace harassment, which is mostly unaddressed. Because of the opaque character of our higher judiciary, this type of intimidation and harassment is widely overlooked. While arguing cases, there have been countless incidents of women lawyers being verbally harassed by their male peers. There are some states, like Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh, and Himachal Pradesh, that do not even have a single woman judge in the high courts. Only approximately 15% of the 1.7 million advocates registered with the bar councils are women.

CONCLUSION

The Indian legal system is indeed not the same as before a decade ago, and the numerous developments occurring inside it as a result of technological advancements and changes in working styles would necessitate a period of absorption before further advancements can be recognized. Developing e-courts in India would growth improve the justice delivery method, and the ease of being willing to debate online from the Advocate’s office may entice Indian women advocates to begin practicing or teaching over the internet. The desire to become a judge continues to entice Advocates and lawyers, however, the number of female Justices has not grown in comparison to male Judges throughout the years.

Women in the practice of law, on the other hand, must be more active. They should get together to address workplace challenges of gender discrimination. There are many female lawyers who may lead such organizations, and while numbers alone may not be enough to make a difference, there is power in numbers. Several gender-friendly adjustments to the law have been enacted in recent years by the courts. However, it must now look internally and embrace the gender disparities in the profession, as well as the fact that as a result, it’s really clearly losing the expertise of many outstanding women.

This article is written by Tingjin Marak, a BA/LLB student at Ajeenkya DY Patil University Pune.

About The Quantum Hub (TQH) Consulting

The Quantum Hub (TQH) was founded in 2017 with the express intent of supporting development organisations, businesses and policymakers with complex public policy problems in the dynamically evolving Indian ecosystem. We are based out of New Delhi and support clients along the entire cycle of policy formulation – from developing well-researched policy positions to building communications and advocacy strategies. Description of TQH’s current and previous engagements The team at TQH works on a diverse range of projects. We work across sectors such as tech policy, social policy and urban affairs.

We have led policy research and advocacy work for Catalyst, an initiative seeded by the Government of India and USAID to increase the adoption of digital payments in India. We have also worked closely with the Government of Haryana for employment and skilling, supported NITI Aayog and the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation (MSDF) with building momentum for reforms in education and undertaken projects for UN agencies. We currently anchor all advocacy initiatives for the Property Rights Research Consortium and are working to build support for policies that empower women with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and IWWAGE. We also lead policy assignments for tech majors such as Amazon and work with industry bodies such as NASSCOM on regulation of new business models. Our other projects include advocacy support to Omidyar Network India on Open Digital Ecosystems and tech policy work for the Match Group in India. We also work with the Lancet Commission on issues of political economy of healthcare. In addition to the above, we work to strengthen research-based civic engagement and participatory governance by assisting offices of Members of Parliament, Members of State Legislatures, Government Ministries and institutions with research and advocacy on legislative and policy issues through our policy learning arm Young Leaders for Active Citizenship (YLAC). 

Responsibilities

– Undertaking policy research and analysis to help clients formulate evidence-backed positions on key policy interventions in their sectors; supporting clients in crafting advocacy strategies and helping them put these into action

– Amplifying policy solutions by writing opinion pieces, creating knowledge products and working closely with civil society organisations as well as the media

– Working on in-house research projects to build and showcase thought leadership on key policy issues under consideration by the government, especially in sectors that are dynamically evolving

– Furthering the cause of civic engagement and participatory governance by supporting public policy research and learning through YLAC programs

Qualifications required

– Degree from a reputed university in law/ economics/ public policy/ political science/ related fields or experience in policy research/ policy communications/ journalism/ advocacy

– 1-2 years of work experience (Associate), 2-3 years of work experience (Analyst), 3-5 years of work experience (Senior Analyst)

– Strong analytical skills, both quantitative and qualitative

– Ability to present information in a structured and insightful manner – Excellent communication skills and an eye for detail

– Ability to work in a dynamic environment with a strong desire to learn new skills

Perks

– Compensation commensurate with experience and in line with market expectations

– An intellectually stimulating work environment with peers from top institutions

– An opportunity to shape the way policy-making is undertaken in India and a chance to inform the thinking on rapidly evolving policy issues

– An avenue to work directly with marquee clients

– A platform to engage with policy enthusiasts through YLAC

Location

Lajpat Nagar III, New Delhi with sporadic travel to other cities. At present, our team is working from home and we plan to operate remotely until the COVID situation is brought under control.

How to Apply?

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScJwMci5UGatNpjZaEkk-ZLfGKDUqHmJCR20zseojm34Ymmkg/viewform

For regular updates, join us:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/CdshAqpiV1FEogy5pBlY43

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

Job for Advocate and Lawyer

Position–  Junior Associate

PQE-Fresher is welcome if you are confident about your Legal Drafting and Knowledge of the Law.

Salary: As per Industry Standards

Location: Lajpat Nagar

If you are interested please send your CV along with a covering letter at mail@imranali.co.in

COHT Law Firm

Position–   Associate Lawyer

PQE-1-5 Year

Salary: As per Industry Standards

15 Days Probation Mandatory

Opportunity – Exposure to Supreme Court, High Court, District Court, NCT , NCLAT and NCDRC in Delhi

If you are interested please send your CV along with a covering letter at recuitmentlg29@gmail.com

Disclaimer-Lexpeeps is only providing information, Kindly Verify with recruiters

ABOUT THE HOST

Himachal Pradesh National Law University  (HPNLU Shimla) is a National Law University located at Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. It is the 20th National Law University established in India. National Law University, is set up with the vision to provide affordable quality legal education with an aim to educate and cater to the needs of students. NLU Shimla is governed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh

NAME OF THE EVENT

Call for paper

ABOUT THE EVENT

The Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla, is launching the Third Volume of its annual publication, Shimla Law Review (SLR) (ISSN: 2582-1903). The volume is scheduled to be out in the month of December 2020. In this connection, submissions, under different categories, are invited form interested faculty members, research scholars, judges, and professionals. The volume is not restricted to any particular theme and manuscripts with an interdisciplinary perspective on contemporary socio-legal issues, theories, and developments awaiting scholarly treatment are encouraged. The last date for submission of contributions is September 01, 2020. Selection of entries are based on double-blind peer review. Queries about the submission of papers and related matters may be directed to: editorslr@hpnlu.ac.in.

DATES AND DEADLINES

01 September 2020

THEME OF THE EVENTS

There is no specific or particular theme(s) or topic(s) for the Volume. All submissions, relating to law, directly or otherwise, are welcome.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE EVENT

1. The manuscripts should be well researched/ documented following uniform citation method for footnotes given above.
2. The manuscripts should be the original work of the contributor and not a compilation of pre-existing works on the subject. It should not amount to the violation of others’ copyright. The contributor has to give a declaration as to the originality of the work.
3. The copyright in all articles, published in the Volume, shall vest in the owner of the Shimla Law Review i.e. HPNLU, Shimla.
4. The views adopted from other sources and others’ work must be quoted and sufficiently acknowledged.
5. Paraphrasing another author’s work shall not be considered as original work. The source has to be acknowledged.
6. The Contributor has to cover the risk of being sued for copyright, defamation or contempt and shall be liable to suffer the losses if caused by violating copyright.

IMPORTANT GUIDELINES

• All submission in Electronic form: All contributions have to be submitted in electronic form. The manuscript should be typed in MS Office double spaced, with a left margin of one and a half inches, and send to: editorslr@hpnlu.ac.in.
• Abstract: Abstract of the paper in 250-300 words should be sent along with the electronic submissions.
• Covering Letter: Author(s) must send a covering letter mentioning the title of the paper, name, designation and details of the author(s) and institutional affiliation. The author(s) are compulsorily required to make a solemn declaration about the originality of the manuscript and that the same has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.
• Communication of Acceptance: The decision on the acceptance of the paper for publication will be that of the Editorial Board (Shimla Law Review), which shall be final. The decision of acceptance will be communicated to the contributor in eight weeks of receiving the submission.

CONTACT DETAILS

MILE, SHIMLA-MANDI NATIONAL HIGHWAY, GHANDAL DISTRICT SHIMLA, HIMACHAL PRADESH-171014. INDIA.

Ph. 0177-2779802, 0177-2779803, Fax:0177-2779802. Email: editorslr@hpnlu.ac.in; Website: CLICK HERE

ABOUT THE ORGANISER

Rayat College of Law, Railmajra(Affiliated to Panjab University, Chandigarh) under the guidance of Dr Monika Sharma(Principal-Rayat College of Law) are geared up to organize yet another illuminating and enriching virtual session for augmenting legal and practical knowledge of Mechanism of Alternative Dispute Resolution on the aspect of ” Mediation–A Progressive Path Towards Peaceful Society”

DATE & TIME

Sunday i.e. 7th June 2020 from 11:30 a.m to 1:00 p.m.

SPEAKERS

We’re pleased to announce that we have onboard with us Mr Amar Vivek,(Former  Additional Advocate General Haryana Advocate and Mediator at Mediation & Conciliation Center, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh) and Ms Monika Jalota (Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, Mediator at Mediation & Conciliation Center, Punjab and Haryana High Court and Potential Trainer Mediation and Conciliation Project Committee Honourable Supreme Court )

REGISTRATION DETAILS

The registration is free and also e-certificates would be provided to all the registered users and attendees.

Kindly fill the following registration form :-

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1_1V93iNkDm3iU99koVZ4rIx4siJr4X0wF6TPYhLlsOI/edit?usp=sharing

SPONS0RS OF THE EVENT

LEXPEEPS.IN, LawKit and Kanuni Sahara

For any queries

contact:-Saksham 4th Year (9780313669)

Jashan    4th Year (7589326264)