INTRODUCTION

In a world where all the countries are running towards development, a lot of industries are being established and excessive utilization of natural resources is taking place. Today, nature’s resources are facing extinction and the whole world is planning to save the resources for the coming generations and future use. In this process, there are chances that the development of the countries may decelerate. For the development and protection of natural resources to go hand in hand, sustainable development has been introduced. The most popular definition of sustainable development is described as development that satisfies current demands without jeopardizing the capacity of future generations to satisfy their own needs. There are two major ideas in it:

  • the idea of needs, especially the basic requirements of the world impoverished, to which top emphasis should be given; and
  • the notion that the environment’s capacity to fulfil existing and future demands is constrained by the level of technology and social structure.

The Brundtland Report, also known as Our Common Future, was issued in 1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development and is where the phrase first appeared. Sustainability recognizes a comprehensive viewpoint that links a community’s economy, ecology, and society. This admits that an economy exists within a society and that society exists within the ecosystem of the world. The angle highlights how closely connected we are to nature.

VARIOUS PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

  1.  Inter-Generational Equity: The principle talks about the right of every generation to get benefits from natural resources. Principle 3 of the Rio declaration states regarding the right to development which meets the needs of the present and the upcoming generations. The main aim behind this principle is to make sure that the present generation should not excessively use non-renewable resources which would deprive the benefit of the next generation.
  • The Principle of Precaution: This is often regarded as the most fundamental concept of ‘Sustainable Development.’ Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration is about the protection of the environment. The states are expected to use their capabilities through the precautionary method to protect the nation. Cost-effective methods must be used to develop the states and protect the environment from serious threats and irreversible harms.
  •  Principle of Polluter Pays: The Rio Declaration in the principle 16 states that the national authorities try to vitalize internalization of the costs of the environment and the economic mechanisms must be used with proper care in the interest of the public without disturbing the international

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND INDIA

India has switched to sustainable development as it has been considered that nature’s protection plays a crucial part in the development of the nation. With the alarming decrease in the number of non-renewable resources that paves a path to the development of the country, India decided to use renewable natural resources and stop the excessive usage or destruction of the resources and protect nature. When United Nations considered sustainable development to be a healthy method, many countries along with India adopted it. The constitution earlier hasn’t declared any provisions to protect the environment but later Article 211 of the Constitution interpreted that the Right to life also implied “the right to live in a healthy environment” explicitly. Various laws implemented by the Indian legal system to protect nature and pave the way for sustainable development are:

  • The National Green Tribunal Act 2010;
  • The Forest (Conservation) Act of 1980
  • The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981;
  • The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974;
  • The Environment Protection Act, 1986, etc.

THE ROLE OF THE INDIAN JUDICIARY

Being a developing nation, India had rapid industrialization and economic growth in recent years. However, it harmed the environment in the country. The Supreme Court of India had a vital role in defining the term Sustainable development. This battle for environmental protection was headed by Justice Kuldip Singh also known as the Green Judge. Most Environment-related cases are approached in front of the Higher courts of India through PILs (Public Interest Litigation) under Article 32 or 226.

Vellore Citizen Welfare Forum vs. Union of India2 was the first case in which the Supreme Court used the idea of “Sustainable Development.” In this instance, a disagreement emerged over certain tanneries in Tamil Nadu. These tanneries were releasing effluents into the Palar River, which served as the state’s primary supply of drinking water. The Supreme Court stated that the court had no problem in declaring the principles, of precautionary and polluter pays as a part of the Indian Environmental law. Restructuring or reviving the harmed environment is the process of Sustainable Development. The polluter is liable and must pay the costs for the victims who’ve been affected and also have to pay for the environmental destruction.

This case has been a landmark judgement which has been given by the Supreme Court. The Idea of Sustainable Development has been made clear by it. This has benefitted a lot to the society. It has been made clear that the polluter has the liability to pay for the damage that he has caused to the environment since the pollution of the environment is considered to have disturbed the aim of sustainable development by polluting its surroundings. Following that, the Apex Court clarified and applied the idea of Sustainable Development in several rulings. In Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India3, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India said “Sustainable Development indicates what sort or degree of development may take place, which can be supported by nature with or without mitigation.”

The Supreme Court used the precautionary principle in M.C Mehta v. Union of India4. In this case, the precautionary principle was applied. A PIL was filed stating that the use of coal/coke has caused a lot of environmental havoc and also regarding the increasing pollution around Taj Mahal, i.e., Acid rains have increased a lot and caused a change in colour of the monument’s marble. It can be inferred from the Supreme Court’s judgement that due to the rapid industrialisation in that area, there have been acidic emissions present in the atmosphere. The issue was taken seriously as this would impact both biotic and abiotic ecosystems. It was also stated by the court that any industry which can’t use natural gas instead of coal or coke can relocate to any other industrial area away from the Taj Trapezium Zone.

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL

India has actively taken part in the UN 2030 Agenda which focuses on the improvement of the environment and tackling climate change through the sustainable development method as it is the most viable method to better the environment without interrupting or stopping the process of development rather, bringing in the healthy way of development. The UN 2030 Agenda has established around 1200 environmental courts and tribunals to promote sustainable development through the judiciary for a better society. The National Green Tribunal was established by the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. This statute controls the handling of civil lawsuits involving nature preservation and environmental protection. Legal rights relating to the environment are mentioned.

It has been said in the case of Sterlite Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board & Ors5 by the NGT while ruling in favour of the firm. It was stated by the court that the regulations regarding the environment need to be enforced strictly however, no action shall be taken just on mere suspicion. The precautionary principle must be applied when reliable scientific evidence reveals that there is a likely signal of some environmental harm or health danger without implementing suitable preventative actions.

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGS)

In the year 2015, the Members of the UN along with India adopted the Sustainable development goals which consist of 17 objectives and 169 targets to fulfil for the eradication of poverty and pollution. Economic growth, Environmental safeguards and Inclusion in society are the objectives of sustainable development goals. The sustainable development goals are inclusive of many factors that affect society in a better manner than the millennial development goals. In T. DamodharRao v. S.O. Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad6, “the court stated that, according to Articles 48-A and 51A(g), it is clear that environmental protection is not only the responsibility of every citizen but also of the State and all other state organs, including courts.”

FULFILMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS BY INDIA

India is said to have fallen 3 spots in 2022 and is currently in 120th position as per the Centre of Science and Environment’s State of India’s Environment Report, 2022. India has attained a score of 66 out of 100. One of the main reasons for the demotion of rank is the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak, the poor in India have become poorer. However, the Sustainable development goals have improved a lot in society. Along with an aim to eradicate poverty which has happened to be effective, according to the survey of the Times of India, it has been observed that the forest area in India has increased and ranks 3rd globally in an average annual net gain in forest area between 2010 to 2020. It has also been observed from the survey that there has been a rapid increase in economic growth along with conservation, ecological security & environmental sustainability. The state governments also play a major role in sustainable development. India also has the SDG India Index to monitor sustainable development within the premises of India.

CONCLUSION

As important as the improvement of the industries and development of the nations, it is more important to conserve nature and its resources, especially those which are non-renewable. There is a saying by Mahatma Gandhi, “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s needs, but not every man’s greed.” The only way that all the countries can develop is by protecting the environment through Sustainable development. India being a developing nation, has a huge necessity for development while approaching the required goals through sustainable development methods. However, through the incentives taken by the Indian Government, the process of development and conservation of nature is going hand in hand, in a peaceful manner.

There are many laws introduced in India. However, through the supervision of the situations, there are amendments made to the laws. The Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2021, which aim to phase out single-use plastic by 2022, were announced in August 2021. The extended producer responsibility for plastic packaging regulation draft has been made public. On July 1st 2022, the Indian government banned single-use plastic to reduce pollution. This is a huge step toward the reduction of land and water pollution. India also plans to meet its goal of the UN Agenda to reduce emissions in India by 2030. The method of Sustainable development paves the path for future generations to utilize the resources to develop their society in the coming time


CITATIONS

1 The Constitution of India 1950, art. 21.

2 Vellore Citizen Welfare Forum vs. Union of India, 1996 5 SCR 241.

3 Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India, 10 SCC 664.

4 M.C Mehta v. Union of India, AIR 1988 SC 1037.

5 Sterlite Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and others, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 221.

6 T. DamodharRao v. S.O. Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad, AIR 1987 AP 171.

This article is written by K. Mihira Chakravarthy, currently enrolled in 1st year, B.A. L.L.B. at Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University (DSNLU).

About the Firm

Legal Foxes is a Law Firm Practicing in Criminal and Civil Litigation, Corporate, Taxation, Intellectual Property Rights, RERA, Mergers and Acquisition and related Fields and is active in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and Delhi District Courts.

About the Internship

The responsibilities of the interns will include assisting the associates in drafting, legal research and procedural court work.

Candidates having prior internship experience will be preferred.

  • No. of Position(s): 02
  • Duration: 2 – 4 months
  • Mode: Offline/Physical
  • Location: Chamber No 634, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates can send their updated CV and work sample to lawfoxes@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Company

Borne of a rich legacy and from the necessity to provide technological platforms for legal research and access to legal materials, EBC Technologies is the software development division of EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. EBC Publishing Pvt. is in turn a group company of the EBC Group. The EBC group has been known for 75 years for creating authentic and reliable legal information: Legal Commentaries, Statutory Law and Law Reports. Supreme Court Cases (SCC) a law report published by Eastern Book Company is the most cited law report by the Supreme Court of India.

All this legal expertise and experience has gone into curating the content which is available on SCC Online a CD-Rom and Web-based research software created by the EBC Tech team. Change in the way people access legal information has been no roadblock for the team and we have constantly kept innovating to support the content team with cutting-edge technological tools so that our customers have the “Surest” experience in accessing legal materials.

About the Internship

  • Duration: One Month (August)
  • Mode: In-office (Lucknow/Delhi)

How to Apply?

Interested candidates can send their CVs at the earliest for suitable slots to Shristi.verma@ebcpublishing.in.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Coordinating a fair trial for those who are inculpated of criminal offences, is the backbone of democracy. A ‘fair trial’ is one of the most important humanitarian aspects of criminal justice and, in a way, an important component reflected in the rule of law. Acknowledgement of the fairest possibility to the accused in order to prove their integrity is the key component of every fair trial. Escorting a fair trial is fruitful both to the accused as well as to the civilisation. A conviction arising from an unfair trial is conflicting with our theory of justice.

INTRODUCTION

A fair trial clearly would mean a trial before an unbiased judge, an honest prosecutor and an environment of judicial tranquillity. A fair trial means a trial in which there’s no discrimination, it is not influenced or twisted for, or against the inculpated and the witnesses or the source which is being tried. If the witnesses get terrorized or are imposed to give forged evidence that also would not score in a fair trial. The failure to gather necessary witnesses is certainly denying a fair trial. The right to a fair trial in a criminal prosecution is enshrined in Article 21. Additionally, Section 142 of the Evidence Act does not give power to the prosecution to put leading questions on the material part of the evidence that a witness intends to give against the accused. To do so infringes the right of the accused to have a fair trial which is enshrined in Article 21, this is not curable in irregularity. The right to have a fair trial, rigorously in terms of the Juvenile Justice Act which would involve procedural protection, is a fundamental right of the juvenile too.

CONCEPT OF A FAIR TRIAL

The right to a fair trial is not just a right furnished in our country but it is also promised by numerous other statutes worldwide. Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights concerns the Right to a fair trial. The Article states that everyone is authorized to have a fair and general hearing within a rational time. The trial must be directed by the liberated and unprejudiced court of law. The African Charter of Human Rights shields the nobility of humans and prevents unfair treatment under Article 5. Article 6 of the same charter also assures separate liberty and safety to a person. The right to a fair trial is promised under Article 7 which embraces several rights like the Right to appeal to adequate jurisdiction, to defence, to be tried and to be assumed decent until proven guilty. Article 14 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) furnishes the right to a fair trial and Article 16 gives a right to acknowledgement before the law. Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), promises the right to a fair trial. The precautions related to a fair trial in the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) are further intended and elaborated than the provisions in UDHR.

Principles of Fair Trial –

  1. Presumption of integrity.
  2. Unbiased, unprejudiced, equitable and competent judge.
  3. Speedy and efficient trial.
  4. The trial should be in an open court.
  5. Proficiency of allegation on adequate occasions.
  6. The trial is to be conducted in the presence of inculpated.
  7. Evidence to be taken in presence of inculpated.
  8. Cross-examination of prosecution witnesses.
  9. Prohibition of vulnerability.
  10. Legal help to be provided.

In Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar1, the Supreme Court has laid great emphasis on speedy trial of criminal offences, and has emphasised: “It is implicit in the broad sweep and content of article 21.” A fair trial suggests a speedy trial. No strategy can be ‘judicious, fair or just’ unless that procedure establishes a speedy trial for the determination of the sin of such a person.

In Pratap Singh v. the State of Jharkhand2, the Supreme Court held that the right to have a fair trial strictly in terms of the Juvenile Justice Act which would include procedural safeguards is a fundamental right of the juvenile.

The advent of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India3 strengthened the concept more. This is a landmark case of the post-emergency. It exhibits liberal propensities that have affected the Supreme Court in the matter of elucidating fundamental rights, particularly, Article 21. A great evolution has come about in the judicial perspective towards the guardianship of personal liberty after the agonizing experiences of the emergency from 1975 to 1977 when personal liberty had outstretched its nadir, as understandable by the Supreme Court. It performed as a catalytic agent for the evolution of the judicial opinion on Article 21 and has been enduring varied pay-off expansion of Constitutional Law in India.

Article 21 guarantees every person a right to life and personal liberty and uses four decisive expressions, viz., ‘life’, ‘personal liberty, ‘procedure’ and ‘law’.

  1. Life: Bhagwati J., has perceived in Francis Coralie v. Delhi4, that the right to life comprises the right to live with human dignity and all that goes down with it, namely, the sustained demands of life such as sufficient nutrition, clothing and shelter above their head, reading, writing and expressing oneself in different forms, mobility and mixing and commingling with the contemporary environment.
  2. Personal Liberty: M. C. Mehta v. Union of India5, the Supreme Court commented that the term personal liberty is not cast-off in a myopic sense but has been used in Article 21 as a concise term to incorporate within it all those diversity of rights of a person which go to make up the personal liberty of a man. The liberty of a person has to be stabilized with his responsibilities and obligations towards his comrade citizens.
  3. Law: Article 21 also takes in several species of law other than the laws enacted by the legislature. S. M. Sharma v. Shri Krishna Sinha6 said that the rules made by a House of the state legislature under Article 208 have been regulated as laying down procedures established by law for purposes of Article 21. Article 21 applies to the area of legislative privileges and, thus, a person cannot be imprisoned for breach of privilege of a legislature accepted following the procedure established by law. Proceedings held before the committee of privileges of a House of the legislature under the rules framed by it in pursuance of article 208 or article 118 are by procedures established by law.
  4. Procedure: It is now established after Maneka Gandhi that procedure for reasons of Article 21 has to be reasonable, fair and just. The expression procedure acclaimed by law expands both to substantive as well as procedural law. A course of action not fulfilling the features is no course of action at all in the eyes of Article 21. In Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation7, the Supreme Court has again highlighted that the procedure directed by law for the seizure of the right vested by Article 21 must be fair, prejudiced and reasonable. The procedure directed by law for seizing a person of his right to life must abide by the norms of justice and fair play. The procedure which is unjust and biased in situations of a case, allures the voice of unreasonableness, thereby deteriorating the law which highlights that procedure and consequently, the measures taken under it.
  5. The onus of proof: The presumption of innocence is a human right. Article 21 given its costly meaning not only protects life and liberty but also envisages a fair process. Similarly, under Article 21, the burden is never on the petitioner to prove that the procedure prescribed by law which deprives him of his life or personal liberty, is unjust, unreasonable or unfair. Bachan Singh is an authority to propose that in cases arising under Article 21 of the Constitution, if it appears that any person is being deprived of his life or his liberty, then the burden of proof establishes the State Constitutional validity of the applicable law.

CONCLUSION

Article 21 visualizes a fair trial, a fair procedure and a fair investigation. Such a right not only entitles the appellant to be informed of their fundamental right and statutory rights, but it is also mandatory on the part of the Special Public Prosecutor to record the necessary material before the judge to show the appeal. Fair investigation and fair trial are closely connected to the preservation of the fundamental rights of the accused under Article 21 of the constitution. Reasonableness would be determined by the facts and conditions of a case and the appraisal by the courts.


CITATIONS

1 AIR 1979 SC 1360 : (1980) 1 SCC 81.

2 AIR (2005) 3 SCC 551 : AIR 2005 SC 2731.

3 AIR 1975 SC 775 : (1975) 3 SCC 836.

4 AIR 1981 SC 746, 753 : (198) 1 SCC 608.

5 (2003) 5 SCC 376 : AIR 2003 SC 3496.

6 AIR 1959 SC 395, 410-11.

7 AIR 198 SC 180, AT 196-197 : (1985) 3 SCC 545.

This article is written by Ashmita Dhumas, who has completed her BA LLB from Agra College and is currently doing a diploma in Corporate Law from Enhelion.

About the Firm

With a legacy of humanity, kindness, brotherhood and revolution left behind for them, their law firm aims to perpetuate the spirit of social revolution by fighting for the rights of as many individuals as possible. They strive to move forward with the idea of constitutional morality being the essence of the nation, which has been taught to them by their beloved lady love and senior colleague Advocate Lily Thomas.

About the Internship

Eligibility: Law students in the final year of their course will be preferred for the position.

Joining: Immediate
Duration: 3 months

How to Apply?

Interested candidates can email their CV and a cover letter to careers@lilythomas.org.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Firm

Step Next Legal’s advocates & legal consultants provide services to large organizations, companies, SMEs, NGOs, government organizations, and individuals. They observe the highest standards of professional ethics and responsibilities in all areas. They have been consulted by many clients with their footprints in India and overseas. Through hard work and determination, they consistently achieve extraordinary results for their clients. 

About the Internship

Mode of Internship: Offline/Physical
Duration: Immediate joining, two months (July and August)
Area of Interest: Civil, Criminal, IPR, Arbitration
Eligibility: Only 4th and 5th-year students.
No. of Position(s): 2

How to Apply?

Interested candidates can send their updated CV to ramitrana89@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About Lawpretation Legal:

Lawpretation Legal is a partnership law firm run by two partners alumni of Campus Law Center, DU since 2015. Deals in all kinds of legal issues/cases throughout Delhi. Also, works for social causes by filling various writ petitions and PILs. which are published in various leading newspapers time and again. Adv. Manan Aggarwal (partner), empanelled in MCD, has also served as a local commissioner during the Covid times for the amicus for covid issues. Adv. Vinay Kumar (partner), is also empanelled in DLSA.

About the Internship opportunity:

The firm is looking for a driven candidate who is willing to learn the basics and tactics of law through practical experiences in the courts of Delhi. A team of young and dynamic lawyers who believe in giving equal and just opportunities to the intern for a great learning experience.

Location: Delhi
Office: Model Town 1

Duration of the internship: No bar for the duration of the internship period depends purely on the working/liking of the intern and associates.

Eligibility:
Any law student from any law college, who is willing to learn and work.
We do not believe in brand names, but in the enthusiasm of the student.

Stipend and certificates:
A certificate will be provided at the completion of the internship period.
The stipend will include the travelling expenses during the working hours for official work.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates can email their CV to lawpretation@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Law Firm:

Anantam Legal is a Law Firm based in New Delhi. Its area of practice are-

  • Civil
  • Business laws
  • Bankruptcy Laws
  • Criminal Law
  • Consumer Laws
  • Family Law
  • ETC…..

Duration of Internship:

July and August 2022

Mode and Location:

Onsite at Delhi Office.

How to Apply?

Interested Candidates can send in their CVs to anant@anantamlegal.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is accurate to our knowledge. However, it is advised that you verify and confirm things on your end.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Firm

Mandla & Singh Law Chambers is a multi-disciplinary Dispute Resolution, Criminal and Civil Litigation firm with dedicated verticals covering White Collar Crimes, Blue Collar Crimes, Company Laws, Property & Land Laws, and Matrimonial Laws, among other fields.

About the Internship

Duration: 4 weeks

No. of Position(s): 3
Location: Hauz Khas
Mode: Offline
Timings: 10am-7.30pm

How to Apply?

Interested persons shall send their CV to mandla.singh.lawchambers@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catch at:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organization

SPRF India is a public policy think tank headquartered in New Delhi. They engage young policy researchers under the guidance of an eminent board of trustees and seasoned advisors. As a dynamic and solution-oriented organisation, they horizontalise and intersectionalise policy by rooting it in data and non-partisanal research. SPRF works at the intersections of Governance, Economy, Human Rights, Security, and Environment. They curate narratives which reflect the aspirations of a country where more than half the population remains under the age of 25.

Their research work finds mention and places in publications like Hindu Business Line, The Quint, The Diplomat, FirstPost, News18, ORF online, Business Insider, NewsClick, Feminism in India, and Down to Earth.

About the Internship

SPRF is looking for research interns to work on policy issues at the intersection of governance, economy, environment, security and human rights. The position is based in New Delhi but the intern would be expected to work from home given the current situation with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The expected starting date is July 10, 2022.

The duration of the internship is 2 months.

This is a paid opportunity.

No. of Position(s): 1

Key Responsibilities

  • Producing high-quality evidence-based research outputs.
  • Qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis.
  • Assisting the research team with data collection and collation, and summarising relevant literature for ongoing short and long-term projects.
  • Assisting the research team with ongoing projects, including but not limited to, inclusive education and disability project-managing timelines, doing background research and transcription.

Desired Qualifications and Skills

  • Students pursuing a postgraduate degree in relevant fields such as political science, sociology, economics, public policy, and security studies, among others.
  • Previous experience in research in academia preferred. Experience in primary research desired.
  • Strong writing skills, ability to think critically, excellent time management, attention to detail, and comfortable working in a start-up environment.
  • Well-versed with qualitative and quantitative methods.
  • Proficiency in MS Office suite required. Working knowledge of SPSS, STATA is desired.
  • Strong transcription skills required-active listening, typing, and language skills (Hindi and English).

How to Apply?

Interested candidates can write to them at recruitment@sprf.in (cc: arushi@sprf.in) with the following:

  1. Updated Resume/CV.
  2. A cover letter outlining relevant experience, skillset, and suitability for the position.
  3. Recent writing sample of not more than 1000 words.

Use the subject line: “Application for Research Intern- [Your Name]

Deadline for application: July 5, 2022

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catch at:

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd