-Report by Nandini Gupta The Supreme Court has held it in the case of HDFC Bank Ltd. & ors. vs. Union of India that a balance has to be struck between the right to privacy and the right to information. FACTS The banks have stated that the Reserve Bank of India has given instructions toRead More
-Report by Annette Abraham In a curious turn of events, the Bombay High Court on Friday granted a reduced sentence to the accused in the Sitaram Dada Sarode v. State of Maharashtra case on the grounds of an inconsistent timeline and the occurrence of grave provocation. The accused, an ayurvedic medic, had been convicted ofRead More
-Report by Nidhi Jha It was in a recent case of RAMESH LASHA PALVA AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, the Bombay High Court held that sharing common intention with the prime offenders is a vital factor for the accused to be convicted for that particular offence. Bombay High Court also clarified that forRead More
-report by Deepti Dubey The Supreme Court, pronouncing the judgement in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation V. Bharat Singh Jhala (Dead) Son of Shri Nathu Singh, through Legal Heirs & Anr expressed that the labour court cannot take a view contrary to the Industrial Tribunal. A Bench of Justice MR Shah and Krishna Murari was considering an appeal plea by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation. FACTS Mr. Bharat Singh Jhala was workingRead More
-Report by Harshita It was held by the hon’ble Supreme Court recently in the case of Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika vs Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika Kamgar Union that the provision of employment to the heirs of employees on compassionate grounds was unsustainable and thus prohibited. FACTS Ahmednagar Municipal Council was converted to Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika in 2003,Read More
-Report by Sarweshree Bawari The High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Jagir Singh Vs the State of Punjab, held that the FIR be dismissed even though the offence was heinous. The matter was classified as being private as it involved a husband-wife, and both of them reached an agreement outside the court. FACTS In thisRead More
-Report by Vedanti Wanjari It has been held by the Supreme Court in the case of The Commissioner, Trade Tax, Uttar Pradesh Vs. M/s. Radico Khetan Ltd. that the power of Section 34 can be exercised only in a case where the transfer of immovable property belonging to the original assessee is made during theRead More
-Report by Nandani Soni It was held by the Supreme Court of India that the order passed by the High court convicting the accused must be quashed and the appellants must be acquitted. FACTS An appeal had been registered against the order passed by the division bench of the High Court. The appellants namely, ChaituRead More
-Report by Khushi Neb The Delhi High Court in a recent judgment in Morgan Securities And Credits Pvt. Ltd. vs Videocon Industries Ltd held that The arbitrator must exercise the discretionary power to grant post-award interest reasonably and in good faith, taking into account all relevant circumstances. FACTS A contract between the appellant and theRead More
-Report by Shreya Shukla In the case of Nisha Mittal v Chief commissioner of income tax, the Central information commission directed the husband of the appellant to provide generic details of the husband for the time period as contained in the RTI Application as well as for the latest financial years to the Appellant freeRead More
Lexpeeps Pvt Ltd provides tailored legal and business solutions, empowering businesses, startups, and professionals with innovative, comprehensive support and cutting-edge services for over half a decade.
© Copyright 2024 Lexpeeps All Rights Reserved | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy