Ministry of Defense vs. Babita Puniya

This case analysis is written by Prithiv Raj Sahu, a student of KIIT School of Law, Bhubaneswar (4th year). Court Supreme Court of India  Civil Appeal No’s 9367-9369 of 2011 Citation MANU/SC/0194/2020 Date of Judgement 17th February 2020 Bench Dr DY Chandrachud, Ajay Rastogi, JJ Subject Defense Law, Constitutional Law Introduction Gender stereotypes always createRead More

Salomon v Salomon

This article has been written by Prithiv Raj Sahu, a student of KIIT School of Law, Bhubaneswar (4th year). The writer has analyzed the case of Solomon v Solomon Separate Legal Personality (SLP) is the basic tenet on which company law is premised. Establishing the foundation of how a company exists and functions, it isRead More

Union Carbide Corporation v Union of India

This article has been written by Pooja Lakshmi, pursuing law at Bennett University. Case no. Civil Appeal No. 3187-88 Of 1988 With SLP (Civil) No. 13080 Of 1988 Equivalent citations 1992 AIR 248, 1991 SCR Supl. (1) 251 Decided On April 5th 1989 Relevant Act Constitution of India, 1950: Article 136, 137, 139-A, 142, 145Read More

Keshavananda Bharti v Union of India

This article is written by Aashika Aggarwal pursuing BBALLB (H) from Amity University, Gurgaon. Judges Involved M. Sikri N. Grover N. Ray G. Palekar R. Khanna M. Shelat K. Mathew S. Hedge H. Beg Jaganmohan Reddy N. Dwivedi V. Chandrachud Introduction Keshvananda Bharti’s case is a landmark case and the decision taken by the SupremeRead More

State of Tamil Nadu v Suhas Katti

Decided On 5TH November, 2004 Citation CC. No. 4680 of 2004 Petitioner State of Tamil Nadu Respondent Suhas Katti Bench Anulrj (CCM), Egmore. Relevant Law Section 469, and 509 of IPC, and 67 of the IT Act 2000. Facts The accused was a family friend of the complainant. The accused posted annoying, defamatory, and obsceneRead More

Kartar Singh v State of Punjab

Decided On 23rd October, 1992 Citation AIR 1993 SC 341, 1993 Cri LJ 183, 1993 Supp (2) SCC 740 Bench Raghubar Dayal, Raghubar Subbarao and K. Mudholkar, J.R. Relevant Law Arms Act 1959 – Section 25; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) – Section 313; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987 (repealed) – Section 5Read More

Tukaram v State of Maharashtra

Case Number 810 Bench Hon’ble Justice Koshal, A.D. Koshal; A.D. Singh, Jaswant, Kailasam, P.S. Decided On 15 September, 1978 Equivalent Citation 1979 AIR 185 Relevant Acts Section 375 and 376 of Indian Penal Code Facts This case is basically the Mathura Rape Case in which the three courts gave different judgements and finally justice wasRead More

Nandini Sundar v State of Chhattisgarh

Case Number 250 Bench B. Sudarshan Reddy, Surinder Singh Nijjar Decided On 5 July, 2011 Equivalent Citation 250 OF 2007 Relevant Acts Section 17 and section 9(1) of Indian Police Act, 1861 Facts This particular case was brought up in front of the Supreme Court of India by Nandini Sundar who works as a sociologyRead More

RD Bajaj v K.P.S Gill

Case Number S.L.P (Cr.) No. 1361 of 1989 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1184 OF 1995 Equivalent Citation 1996 AIR 309, 1995 SCC (6) 194 Decided On 12 October 1995 Relevant Act Sections 341, 342, 352, 354, and 509 of the Indian Penal Code Sections 123/124 of the Evidence Act Section 210,  482of Code of Criminal Procedure Abstract RD Bajaj V. K.P.S.Read More

Vishaka and Others v State of Rajasthan

This article has been written by Harshit Khandelwal, 2nd year Law student currently pursuing BBA-LL.B(Hons.) from Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University. Decided On 13TH August, 1997 Citation AIR 1997 SCC 241 Bench J.S. Verma CJ., Sujata V. Manohar, B.N. Kripal JJ. Relevant Law Sexual Harassment at of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal)Read More