Tag: #legalnews

WHETHER PAST SERVICE AS A CIVIL JUDGE CAN BE USED FOR APPOINTMENT TO DELHI HIGH COURT JUDICIAL SERVICE?

-Report by Sakshi Tanwar The question in the present writ petition is whether the past service rendered by the petitioner as a Civil Judge can be counted for the purpose of calculating the...

When actions of a cabinet committee are approved by the council of ministers, business regulations are not broken by the state

-Report by Utkarsh Kamal In this case, according to the Supreme Court, the State Government cannot argue that Rules of Business were not followed throughout its decision-making process when the...

THERE IS NO PREJUDICE TO THE RIGHTS AND CONTENTIONS OF ALL THE PARTIES, TO BE TAKEN AT AN APPROPRIATE PROCEEDING: DELHI HC

-Report by Mehul Jain It was held by the Delhi High Court in the case of Alliance of Digital India Foundation Vs Competition Commission of India & Ors that on April 24, It is made clear that the observations...

NO ONE IN THE COMMUNITY, NOT EVEN THE COMPLAINANT’S NEIGHBOURS, HAD BACKED UP OR GIVEN EVIDENCE REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF ANY INCIDENT

-Report by Sejal Jethva RITU TOMAR VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS, in this case, the petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Cr.P.C.”) for...

If a candidate’s primary source of income is not from agriculture or holds a license for merchants, commission agents, or brokers, he cannot be selected as a committee member on behalf of the agricultural constituency: Mumbai HC

-Report by Arunima Jain The Mumbai High Court on Friday upheld that any individual representing an agricultureconstituency whilst running for candidature must understand the meaning of being a memberof the...

A CHALLENGE TO THE DECISION MADE UNDER CPC ORDER 37 RULE 4 IS NOT ADMISSIBLE UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1

-Report by Sejal Jethva ZAFAR BADYARI VS. SANDEEP SINGH, in this matter, the appellant/defendant seeks to challenge the decision made by the learned, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, according to Order 43 Rule 1 read...

SC DECLINES TO REVOKE A 40-DAY UNION USING THE POWER OF ARTICLE 142 OF THE CONSTITUTION

-Report by Nehha Mishra In the case of DELMA LUBNA COELHO VS EDMOND CLINT FERNANDES, the petitioner filed the petition seeking the transfer of the pending case before the family judge at Mangaluru, Karnataka...

Non-appearance in the court is self-evident that the party has failed to contend the case on the merits: Delhi HC granted ex parte decision

-Report by Srishti Delhi High Court in the case of LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER Vs SANTOSH & ORS. on April 18 passed an ex parte decision imposing a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from using the...

NO JUSTIFICATION FOR NOT ADJUDICATING NOTICES MORE THAN 15 YEARS AFTER ISSUANCE, THE SAME MUST BE DONE IN A REASONABLE TIME: DELHI HC

-Report by Arunima Jain The Delhi High Court on Thursday while referring to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld that the question of whether the notice or demand for recovery was given within a reasonable length of time considering the case’s facts and circumstances should...

Undertrials’ strip searches are humiliating and violate their fundamental right to privacy, according to a Mumbai Court

-Report by Utkarsh Kamal In this case, we are going to discuss the rights of the prisoners, and also as the fundamental right ( right to privacy) of a prisoner...