Tag: #legalnews

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Faheem Ahmed and Danish Khan in the Laxmi Nagar Case

-Report by Ankit Hinnariya In a recent ruling, the High Court of Delhi granted anticipatory bail to Faheem Ahmed and Danish Khan, the petitioners in a case registered under Sections...

Necessity of Arbitration and its importance in resolving pending cases

-Report by Harshita Kaul The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was enacted with the object of resolving disputes within a certain time framework which will promote confidence among the individuals...

Haj Group Organisers(HGOs) move to Delhi High Court for pilgrimage rights of people

-Report by Tushar Yadav Applications of 299 organisers were rejected by the Ministry of MinorityAffairs out of 810 applications to organize Haj 2023, in the case of AL HATIM TOURS AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD. Vs UNION OF INDIA. Facts: The judgement was given by a single judge bench of Delhi...

CAN PREMATURE RELEASE BE PERMITTED IN A MURDER CASE?

-Report by Sava Vishnu Vardhan In the case of Nagarathinam V. State Through The Inspector Of Police | Criminal Appeal No. 1389 Of 2023, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India overturned the...

Can a trial judge be a mute spectator during court proceedings?

-Report by Gopal Kumar This case is related to Judge’s power to put questions or order production to discover or obtain proper proof of relevant fact under section 165 of the Indian Evidence...

The employer is not to believe that the suppression per se and ipso facto requires termination of employment

-Report by Jay Prakash Chandravanshi This case pertains to the appointment of a Peon on the sympathetic ground after his father died in harness. The petitioner challenged his termination by Maharashtra state electricity Distribution Company Limited...

A PERSON SHOULD NOT BE MADE TO SUFFER MENTAL AGONY TO WORK BELOW HIS JUNIORS: DELHI HC

-Report by Himanshi Chauhan In the present case of Vineet Kumar vs. UOI & Ors, a petition was filed by the petitioner seeking the quashing of an order whereby respondents have not...

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF THE CARRIAGE BY ROAD ACT, 2007, NOT MANDATORY FOR INSTITUTING ANY SUIT OR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, MUCH FEWER COUNTERCLAIMS: SC

-Report by Arunima Jain The Supreme Court on Monday, in the case of Essemm Logistics v. Darcl Logistics Limited& Anr., delved into the meaning and extent of Section 16 of the Carriers by Road Act, 2007read with the Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC). According to the court, no notice is required under Section 16 of the new Act for instituting any suit or legal proceedings, much less a counter-claim against the common carrier for...

ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED PLAINTIFF NOT ALLOWED TO ADD ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AT ANY STAGE OF SUIT STATING SAME GROUNDS OF CASE: DELHI HC

-Report by Arunima Jain The Delhi High Court on Friday carefully examined Order XIV Rule 5 & Order XI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 while adjudicating the present case. Herein, it has been made amply clear by the court that when filing additional documents in a commercial...

STANDING LAWS DO NOT ENVISAGE A PARENT WHO MAY HAVE INCURRED EXPENDITURE IN THE UPBRINGING OF A CHILD BEING VIEWED AS A CREDITOR: DELHI HC

-Report by Sakshi Tanwar The current petition for Letters of Administration has been filed by the mother [petitioner no.1], father [petitioner no.2], and brother [petitioner no.3] of the late Dr....