Tag: legalblogs

Late many years have seen a change in the strategy conversation of orientation and training away from an emphasis on female ‘weakness’ towards a worry with male ‘underachievement’. This blog gives an outline of late exploration on orientation and instruction. It is primarily worried about a conversation of the variables forming distinctions in sexual orientation in instructive accomplishment and field of study. It isn’t expected to suggest that these are the main results of concern. Notwithstanding, an itemized investigation of how tutoring influences more extensive individual and social turn of events (for instance, self-idea) is outside the boundaries of the section. The spotlight here is essentially on evolved nations, albeit large numbers of the issues examined have more extensive importance. The primary area gives an outline of distinctions in sexual orientation in instructive accomplishment and accomplishment across nations. The subsequent area centers around factors which shape such distinctions in sexual orientation, including more extensive socialization, the idea of school association, and youngsters’ everyday encounters inside the school. The third area portrays a few mediations that have been utilized to advance orientation value in instructive results.

In virtually every country there is a sure measure of orientation disparity in training, in certain nations young ladies outflank young men, and in others, they are not permitted to go to class (Parsons, 2009). In the created world, young ladies are almost certain than young men to go onto college (Parsons, 2009) however in the creating scene numerous young ladies can not arrive at auxiliary school (Marshall, 2014). There can be various types of orientation imbalance, particularly in the creating scene. In the Global South, young ladies face hindrances in getting to training, frequently because of well-established social and social practices, like inclination for a child’s schooling, brutality against young ladies’ inside the home and in instructive foundations, and family obligations and homegrown commitments (Marshall, 2014).

In India explicitly, each of the previously mentioned hindrances exists, as well as various more limited size gives that emerge, like the absence of young ladies’ latrines or absence of female educators. The range of deterrents that young ladies face in getting to even the lower levels of training implies that a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive methodology is expected to advance the circumstance in India. There are numerous meanings of the orientation hole contingent upon what the idea of the exploration is centered around. For this review, the meaning of orientation hole is the distinction in quantities of guys and females, for instance in training it would be the contrast between the number of females and guys that had signed up for a specific year of tutoring or the distinction in the scholastic accomplishment of young ladies and young men. This exploration will zero in on the orientation hole in auxiliary and advanced education organizations in India.

CROSS-PUBLIC EXAMPLES IN INSTRUCTIVE FULFILLMENT AND ACCOMPLISHMENT

In taking a gander at distinctions in sexual orientation in instructive results, recognizing three arrangements of results: (i) instructive support and fulfillment, that is to say, how far young ladies and men go inside the schooling system; (ii) instructive accomplishment, that is to say, how well young fellows and ladies perform (for instance, regarding grades) at a given level of the schooling system; and (iii) field of review, or at least, the sort taken inside the school system is significant.

(i) Educational support and achievement

By and large, men in Western nations would in general have higher instructive fulfillment levels than ladies (Spender and Sarah, 1980). At present, among the grown-up populace (that is, those matured 25 to 64), men are found to have more long stretches of tutoring and are bound to arrive at upper auxiliary training (or higher) than ladies in two out of three created nations (OECD, 2005). In any case, zeroing in on the grown-up populace all in all masks significant changes among ongoing associates of youngsters. If by some stroke of good luck the most youthful age-bunch is thought of (that is, those matured 25 to 34), the authentic example is switched with female fulfillment levels higher than male rates in two out of three nations. Right now, upper optional graduation rates are higher among young ladies than young fellows in most OECD nations (OECD, 2005). Moreover, in around two out of three nations, female graduation rates for tertiary training are equivalent to, or surpass, male rates in about two out of three OECD nations. High-level exploration degrees are the main level where men keep on overwhelming mathematically (OECD 2004, 2005). Indeed, even at this level, massive changes have occurred with the extent of females among doctoral alumni in the United States, for instance, expanding from 14% in 1971 to 42 percent in 1998 (England et al., 2004).

(ii) Educational accomplishment

There are two different ways of evaluating instructive accomplishment: right off the bat, by checking out (distinctions in sexual orientation in) execution on (broadly or cross-broadly) state-sanctioned trial of capacity; furthermore, by taking a gander at how young ladies and men perform based on evaluation frameworks utilized inside their public (or local) school systems. These two methodologies enjoy corresponding benefits in investigating distinctions in sexual orientation. Cross-broadly state-administered tests yield bits of knowledge about the degree to which distinctions in sexual orientation in a similar result shift across nations. Country-explicit evaluation yields extremely helpful bits of knowledge about distinctions in sexual orientation in execution and capabilities accomplishment which will affect admittance to additional schooling, preparation, and work.

(iii) Field of study and course decision

Disregarding critical expansions in young ladies’ instructive fulfillment, stamped distinctions in sexual orientation endure in the sorts of courses taken inside the school system (Bradley, 2000). Across European nations, designing courses at the upper auxiliary level will quite often be overwhelmingly male while wellbeing/government assistance, expressions/humanities, training courses, and sociology/business courses are lopsidedly female (Smyth, 2005). Inside tertiary training, ladies are over-addressed in the fields of humanities, expressions, schooling, well-being, and government assistance while young fellows are over-addressed in math and software engineering, designing, assembling, and development (OECD, 2004).

The schooling system – As well as investigating the effect of more extensive cultural patterns on instructive results, analysts have progressively centered around how the idea of the tutoring framework itself adds to the creation and propagation of distinctions in sexual orientation. This and the accompanying segments investigate the effect of various variables, including the school system at a large scale level, school association and culture, and whether schools are coeducational or single-sex in profile.

Two parts of the school system have been recognized as key in molding distinctions in sexual orientation in scholarly results: the nature and timing of separation into various courses or tracks, and the methodology taken to understudy evaluation. Buchmann and Charles (1995) suggest that, where instructive decisions are made at an early age, they are bound to be oriented run-of-the-mill and that this component, combined areas of strength with work market linkages (for instance, through occupationally-explicit preparation), implies that orientation isolation is probably going to be more articulated in nations with exceptionally separated, professionally arranged frameworks.

ORIENTATION BLEND INSIDE SCHOOLS

Perhaps the earliest significant investigation of co-education (Dale, 1969, 1971, 1974) demonstrated positive formative results for understudies in blended orientation schools with no adverse consequence on instructive results. Conversely, the resulting concentrates on featured a benefit to young ladies going to single-sex schools with regards to their scholastic grades and the probability of concentrating on less ‘conventional’ subjects. Contrasts among coeducational and single-sex schools were ascribed to male strength of homeroom communication, instructor mentalities and assumptions, peer culture, and various ways to deal with review among male and female understudies (see, for instance, Spender and Sarah, 1980; Deem, 1984). Specialized progress in the field of school viability (utilizing staggered or various leveled straight displaying) implied that more exact assessments could be determined of the impacts of the school orientation blend, well beyond those of understudy foundation factors.

MALE AND FEMALE OR GUYS AND FEMALES?

A portion of the conversation of distinctions in sexual orientation in instructive results seems to set ‘male’ and ‘female’ as the main pertinent differentiations. Be that as it may, a significant and developing collection of examinations demonstrates the complicated manners by which orientation collaborates with different factors, for example, social class foundation and nationality. Without a doubt, the development of orientation can shift across various gatherings of young ladies and young men; there are numerous ‘masculinities’ and ‘femininities’ (Connell, 2002). In an investigation of elementary younger students, Reay (2001) found that young ladies took up extremely changed positions comparable to customary femininities: ‘decent young ladies’, ‘chicks’, ‘flavor young ladies’, and ‘spitfires’ and thus, that’s what she contended: “doubles like male: female, kid: young lady frequently keeps us from seeing the full scope of variety and separation existing inside one orientation as well as between classifications of male and female” (p.163). It is significant, consequently, to go past regarding orientation as a variable that ‘makes sense of’ various results and take a gander at how youngsters develop and establish orientation over the long run (Scott, 2004).

STRATEGY INTERCESSIONS AND ORIENTATION VALUE

Strategies connecting with orientation value in training have fallen into four principal classifications: hostile to segregation regulation, the advancement of support in contemporary branches of knowledge, single-sex classes and additionally schools, and the improvement of ‘kid agreeable’ materials, educating, and evaluation techniques. Normally, distinctions in sexual orientation in instructive results may likewise be formed by more extensive instructive changes not unequivocally pointed toward advancing orientation value.

A scope of regulative measures has precluded direct victimization of either orientation in instructive arrangement across various created nations. In the United States, Title IX of the Educational Amendments Act of 1972 restricted sex separation in schooling with resulting regulation, (for example, the Women’s Education Equity Act 1974) giving assets to advancing orientation value in training. Additionally, the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 in Britain made it unlawful to avoid young ladies or young men from specific courses. Notwithstanding, it is challenging to unravel the effect of such regulation from the course of more extensive social change (Stromquist, 1993) and, as the exploration framed above has shown, gendered results more frequently reflect unpretentious cycles as opposed to obvious separation.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing many years have seen female instructive fulfillment and accomplishment levels equivalent, or outperform, those of their male partners in many created nations. Regardless of these changes, constant distinctions in sexual orientation are obvious in the sorts of subjects and courses taken by young ladies and men inside auxiliary and tertiary training. This section has illustrated a portion of the principal clarifications framed for these examples. Distinctions in sexual orientation in instructive accomplishment have been credited to more extensive social and work market factors, the methodology taken to understudy appraisal, the feminization of education, the example of homeroom cooperation, and the ‘laddish’ culture among young men, and the orientation blend of the school. Distinctions in sexual orientation in the field of review have been differently credited to organic elements, orientation isolation inside the work market, the idea of the school system, whether the school is co-educational or single-sex, and the development of specific circles of information as ‘male’ or ‘female’.

REFERENCES

1. Arnot, M. (2002) Reproducing Gender? London: Routledge Falmer.
2. Arnot, M., David, M. and Weiner, G. (1999) Closing the Gender Gap. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3. Arnot, M. and Miles, P. (2005) “A reconstruction of the gender agenda: the contradictory gender dimensions in New Labour’s educational and economic policy”, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 173-189.
4. Askew, S. and Ross, C. (1988) Boys Don’t Cry: Boys and Sexism in Education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
5. Ayalon, H. (1995). “Math as a Gatekeeper: Ethnic and Gender Inequality in Course-taking of the Sciences in Israel”, American Journal of Education, Vol. 104, pp.  34-56.

This article is written by Arpita Kaushal, a student of UILS, PUSSGRC , HOSHIARPUR.

Coordinating a fair trial for those who are inculpated of criminal offences, is the backbone of democracy. A ‘fair trial’ is one of the most important humanitarian aspects of criminal justice and, in a way, an important component reflected in the rule of law. Acknowledgement of the fairest possibility to the accused in order to prove their integrity is the key component of every fair trial. Escorting a fair trial is fruitful both to the accused as well as to the civilisation. A conviction arising from an unfair trial is conflicting with our theory of justice.

INTRODUCTION

A fair trial clearly would mean a trial before an unbiased judge, an honest prosecutor and an environment of judicial tranquillity. A fair trial means a trial in which there’s no discrimination, it is not influenced or twisted for, or against the inculpated and the witnesses or the source which is being tried. If the witnesses get terrorized or are imposed to give forged evidence that also would not score in a fair trial. The failure to gather necessary witnesses is certainly denying a fair trial. The right to a fair trial in a criminal prosecution is enshrined in Article 21. Additionally, Section 142 of the Evidence Act does not give power to the prosecution to put leading questions on the material part of the evidence that a witness intends to give against the accused. To do so infringes the right of the accused to have a fair trial which is enshrined in Article 21, this is not curable in irregularity. The right to have a fair trial, rigorously in terms of the Juvenile Justice Act which would involve procedural protection, is a fundamental right of the juvenile too.

CONCEPT OF A FAIR TRIAL

The right to a fair trial is not just a right furnished in our country but it is also promised by numerous other statutes worldwide. Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights concerns the Right to a fair trial. The Article states that everyone is authorized to have a fair and general hearing within a rational time. The trial must be directed by the liberated and unprejudiced court of law. The African Charter of Human Rights shields the nobility of humans and prevents unfair treatment under Article 5. Article 6 of the same charter also assures separate liberty and safety to a person. The right to a fair trial is promised under Article 7 which embraces several rights like the Right to appeal to adequate jurisdiction, to defence, to be tried and to be assumed decent until proven guilty. Article 14 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) furnishes the right to a fair trial and Article 16 gives a right to acknowledgement before the law. Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), promises the right to a fair trial. The precautions related to a fair trial in the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) are further intended and elaborated than the provisions in UDHR.

Principles of Fair Trial –

1. Presumption of integrity.
2. Unbiased, unprejudiced, equitable and competent judge.
3. Speedy and efficient trial.
4. The trial should be in an open court.
5. Proficiency of allegation on adequate occasions.
6. The trial is to be conducted in the presence of inculpated.
7. Evidence to be taken in presence of inculpated.
8. Cross-examination of prosecution witnesses.
9. Prohibition of vulnerability.
10. Legal help to be provided.

In Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar¹, the Supreme Court has laid great emphasis on speedy trial of criminal offences, and has emphasised: “It is implicit in the broad sweep and content of article 21.” A fair trial suggests a speedy trial. No strategy can be ‘judicious, fair or just’ unless that procedure establishes a speedy trial for the determination of the sin of such a person.

In Pratap Singh v. the State of Jharkhand², the Supreme Court held that the right to have a fair trial strictly in terms of the Juvenile Justice Act which would include procedural safeguards is a fundamental right of the juvenile.

The advent of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India³ strengthened the concept more. This is a landmark case of the post-emergency. It exhibits liberal propensities that have affected the Supreme Court in the matter of elucidating fundamental rights, particularly, Article 21. A great evolution has come about in the judicial perspective towards the guardianship of personal liberty after the agonizing experiences of the emergency from 1975 to 1977 when personal liberty had outstretched its nadir, as understandable by the Supreme Court. It performed as a catalytic agent for the evolution of the judicial opinion on Article 21 and has been enduring varied pay-off expansion of Constitutional Law in India.

Article 21 guarantees every person a right to life and personal liberty and uses four decisive expressions, viz., ‘life’, ‘personal liberty, ‘procedure’ and ‘law’.

1. Life: Bhagwati J., has perceived in Francis Coralie v. Delhi⁴, that the right to life comprises the right to live with human dignity and all that goes down with it, namely, the sustained demands of life such as sufficient nutrition, clothing and shelter above their head, reading, writing and expressing oneself in different forms, mobility and mixing and commingling with the contemporary environment.
2. Personal Liberty: M. C. Mehta v. Union of India^5, the Supreme Court commented that the term personal liberty is not cast-off in a myopic sense but has been used in Article 21 as a concise term to incorporate within it all those diversity of rights of a person which go to make up the personal liberty of a man. The liberty of a person has to be stabilized with his responsibilities and obligations towards his comrade citizens.
3. Law: Article 21 also takes in several species of law other than the laws enacted by the legislature. S. M. Sharma v. Shri Krishna Sinha⁶ said that the rules made by a House of the state legislature under Article 208 have been regulated as laying down procedures established by law for purposes of Article 21. Article 21 applies to the area of legislative privileges and, thus, a person cannot be imprisoned for breach of privilege of a legislature accepted following the procedure established by law. Proceedings held before the committee of privileges of a House of the legislature under the rules framed by it in pursuance of article 208 or article 118 are by procedures established by law.
4. Procedure: It is now established after Maneka Gandhi that procedure for reasons of Article 21 has to be reasonable, fair and just. The expression procedure acclaimed by law expands both to substantive as well as procedural law. A course of action not fulfilling the features is no course of action at all in the eyes of Article 21. In Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation⁷, the Supreme Court has again highlighted that the procedure directed by law for the seizure of the right vested by Article 21 must be fair, prejudiced and reasonable. The procedure directed by law for seizing a person of his right to life must abide by the norms of justice and fair play. The procedure which is unjust and biased in situations of a case, allures the voice of unreasonableness, thereby deteriorating the law which highlights that procedure and consequently, the measures taken under it.
5. The onus of proof: The presumption of innocence is a human right. Article 21 given its costly meaning not only protects life and liberty but also envisages a fair process. Similarly, under Article 21, the burden is never on the petitioner to prove that the procedure prescribed by law which deprives him of his life or personal liberty, is unjust, unreasonable or unfair. Bachan Singh is an authority to propose that in cases arising under Article 21 of the Constitution, if it appears that any person is being deprived of his life or his liberty, then the burden of proof establishes the State Constitutional validity of the applicable law.

CONCLUSION

Article 21 visualizes a fair trial, a fair procedure and a fair investigation. Such a right not only entitles the appellant to be informed of their fundamental right and statutory rights, but it is also mandatory on the part of the Special Public Prosecutor to record the necessary material before the judge to show the appeal. Fair investigation and fair trial are closely connected to the preservation of the fundamental rights of the accused under Article 21 of the constitution. Reasonableness would be determined by the facts and conditions of a case and the appraisal by the courts.

---

CITATIONS

¹ AIR 1979 SC 1360 : (1980) 1 SCC 81.

² AIR (2005) 3 SCC 551 : AIR 2005 SC 2731.

³ AIR 1975 SC 775 : (1975) 3 SCC 836.

⁴ AIR 1981 SC 746, 753 : (198) 1 SCC 608.

⁵ (2003) 5 SCC 376 : AIR 2003 SC 3496.

⁶ AIR 1959 SC 395, 410-11.

⁷ AIR 198 SC 180, AT 196-197 : (1985) 3 SCC 545.

This article is written by Ashmita Dhumas, who has completed her BA LLB from Agra College and is currently doing a diploma in Corporate Law from Enhelion.

Human Trafficking is the illegal transportation of human beings from one place to another against their will or by use of force or by luring them in under a misconception. It is aimed at the use of a class of persons for forced labour, sexual exploitation and many other activities that benefit in economic terms. It is considered a social problem as it violates the human rights granted to citizens of every nation, it also adds to global health problems, and the organized crime rate. The Act itself is of such heinous nature that it was called ‘Flesh Trade’¹. Victims of human trafficking may suffer for a longer duration of time. The Act itself puts a big question mark on the security of countries.

LAWS RELATED TO HUMAN TRAFFICKING

INDIAN CONSTITUTION

Article 23: Provides that trafficking in human beings, the begar and other forms of forced labour are debarred by the Indian Constitution under this Article and if someone violates this law, he/she shall be punishable by law. The only exception to this rule is that the state can impose obligatory service on its citizens without making any discrimination on grounds of race, caste, religion, class, or gender.

As per the case of People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India^2, the term forced labour was defined by the court as ‘the labour that one performs against his/her will or the job he/she is doing is not paying the minimum wage to the worker’. The state is bound to protect citizens from heinous offences like this by taking immediate and effective action against it and under Article 35 of the Indian Constitution, the Parliament has the authority to make laws that punish the offender of Article 23. Acts like the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 and the Abolition of Bonded Labour System Act, 1956.

Article 24: It forbids children below the age of 14 years to be employed in any factory or mine or any other hazardous arrangement for employment. Whereas, employment in non-hazardous industries is permissible.

In pursuance to provide protection under this article, certain Acts were passed by the Government of India:

The Factories Act, 1948: First act to be passed after independence to define the minimum age limit for children who work in factories i.e., 14 years. Later, amended and provided the minimum age of work as 17 years at night.

The Mines Act, 1952: Forbids the employment of children below the age of 18 years in mines.

Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976: This act provides for the protection of weaker sections of society economically and physically. Providing the punishment for those who are involved in acts of bonded labour. The government provides compensation to the victims of bonded labour and rehabilitation³.

The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986: This act provides a detailed view of places where children are allowed to work and where not. This act provides a list of 13 places and 57 processes where children are not allowed to work. 

Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016: This act prohibits the employment of persons who have not completed the age of 14 years. Also, a complete ban on persons between the age of 14 and 18 years working in hazardous factories.

Child Labour (Prohibition and Protection) Amendment Rules, 2017: This provides an overview of prevention, protection, rescue, and rehabilitation of children and adolescent workers and also provides fixed working hours and other environment-friendly conditions for working.

IMMORAL TRAFFIC (PREVENTION) ACT, 1956

Section 3: Provides punishment to a person responsible for having a brothel or renting someone a place to be used as a brothel.

Section 4: Punishment for those who are above the age of 18 years and living on the allowances that come through someone being a prostitute.

Section 5: Punishing those who are involved in inciting a person for the sake of prostitution.

Section 6: It punishes the one who detains another person with or without their consent to any brothel or any place that is for prostitution with having an intention that the person who is detained is to have sexual intercourse with any person who is supposedly the spouse of the detained person.

Section 7: Any person who carries out prostitution or the other person with whom the prostitution is carried out is in the proximity of public places including hospitals, clinics, hostels, education institutes, or in any other area i.e., mentioned in provisions of this act is punishable with a term of imprisonment of 3 months.  

Section 8: Luring someone for the purpose of prostitution in first conviction punishable with imprisonment of 6 months and a fine up to Rs. 500. In case of second conviction imprisonment of a year inclusive of fine of Rs. 500.

Section 18: Magistrate has the power to order the immediate closing of a location used as a brothel and located within 200 Meters radar to any public place. The owner is only given 7 days to evict from such a place.

Section 20: Magistrate has the power to order any person who is in the profession of prostitution and residing in any area within the jurisdiction of the concerned Magistrate to be present before the court and show cause why he should be allowed to continue to live in that area.

Section 21: State government may direct and establish enough protective homes and corrective institutions and their maintenance as mentioned under this act. If the procedure is not followed as mentioned in the act, may be liable for punishment.

Section 22A: If the State government believes that cases related to offences mentioned in this act should be decided through speedy trial, it may along with consultation of the state High Court may establish more courts for Judicial Magistrate First Class or Metropolitan Magistrate in any such area.

Section 22B: Irrespective of anything that is mentioned in CrPC state government has authority to direct the trial of any offence mentioned under this act shall be done in a summary way by the magistrate.

Supreme Court passed an order in the case of Gaurav Jain v. Union of India³ that a committee must be constituted for an in-depth study of problems faced by prostitutes, child prostitution, and children of prostitutes and help them through suitable schemes that help in their rehabilitation in society.

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860

Section 360: Whosoever he/she may take any person beyond the premises of India without his consent or any other person who is authorized to give consent on behalf of that person is called an offence of kidnapping a person from India.

Section 361: Whoever lures or takes a minor i.e., under the age of 16 years for males and under the age of 18 years for females or any other person who is incapable of giving his consent is stated as kidnap a person from the custody of his lawful guardianship.

Section 362: Any person who got trafficked is also a victim of abduction as the person was forced to move from a place of his/her choice.

Section 363A: Prescribes the punishment for those who kidnap and cripple a person of minor age for purpose of begging.

Section 366A: Provides punishment for any person who entices any minor girl to move from one place to any other place where she may be forced to have sexual intercourse with another person.

Section 370: Punishment for the persons who are involved in the trafficking of human beings and in any other acts related to human trafficking.

Section 372: If any person who sells disposes of, or lets her be hired for the purpose of prostitution any person who is below the age of 18 years shall be liable for imprisonment for up to 10 years with a fine.

Section 373: If any person buys, obtains, or hires any person who is below the age of 18 years shall be liable for imprisonment for up to 10 years with a fine.

GOVERNMENT’S ATTEMPT

The Ministry of Home Affairs of India has introduced a scheme ‘Strengthening Law Enforcement Response in India Against Trafficking’ under the scheme 330 Anti Human Trafficking Units will be established throughout the country and training would be given to up to 10,000 police officers. Funds as the first instalment for the same were released by the government in the year 2010-2011 to all state governments. Around 85 units have already been established all over India.

Ministry of Women and Child Development provides a scheme called ‘Ujjawala’ that provides for measures to be taken for preventing human trafficking, rescue, and rehabilitation of the victims. With the help of funds granted for scheme 101 centres that provide for rehabilitation and can be home to 4056 victims.⁴

CONCLUSION

Supreme Court claimed that when a child is given in adoption, he/she must be treated well and great care must be taken especially in cases of inter-country adoption so that the child must have moral security and must not end up being a product of sale and purchase for the foreign parents⁵. Even after the implementation of many schemes by the government of India still records more than 5,000 registered cases of human trafficking for a year and India comes under Tier 2 in the index of human trafficking meaning a moderate level of crime. While some people do not even register FIR for the offence due to lower rates of successful conviction in the cases.

---

CITATIONS

1. Vishal Jeet v. Union of India 1990 AIR 1412.
2. 1982 3 SCC 235.
3. 1997 8 SCC 114.
4. Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, 1984 AIR 802.
5. Laxmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India, 1984 2 SCC 244.

---

This article is written by Simran Gulia currently pursuing a BA LLB from Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies.