Tag: #lawstudents

APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF APPEAL IS NOT TENABLE IF POWER OF ATTORNEY STOOD CANCELLED: SC

-Report by Himanshi Chauhan In the recent judgement of YOGESH NAVINCHANDRA RAVANI v. NANJIBHAI SAGRAMBHAI CHAUDHARY & ORS, an appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the final judgement of the High...

NO MANDAMUS CAN BE ISSUED DIRECTING EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS TO ACT CONTRARY TO THEIR OWN PROCEDURE: DELHI HC

-Report by Himanshi Chauhan In the recent case of Ruksana v. Jawahar Lal Nehru University, a writ petition was filed, in the Hon’ble Court for the violation of Articles 14 & 15 of the Indian Constitution, by...

WHETHER PAST SERVICE AS A CIVIL JUDGE CAN BE USED FOR APPOINTMENT TO DELHI HIGH COURT JUDICIAL SERVICE?

-Report by Sakshi Tanwar The question in the present writ petition is whether the past service rendered by the petitioner as a Civil Judge can be counted for the purpose of calculating the...

When actions of a cabinet committee are approved by the council of ministers, business regulations are not broken by the state

-Report by Utkarsh Kamal In this case, according to the Supreme Court, the State Government cannot argue that Rules of Business were not followed throughout its decision-making process when the...

THERE IS NO PREJUDICE TO THE RIGHTS AND CONTENTIONS OF ALL THE PARTIES, TO BE TAKEN AT AN APPROPRIATE PROCEEDING: DELHI HC

-Report by Mehul Jain It was held by the Delhi High Court in the case of Alliance of Digital India Foundation Vs Competition Commission of India & Ors that on April 24, It is made clear that the observations...

If a candidate’s primary source of income is not from agriculture or holds a license for merchants, commission agents, or brokers, he cannot be selected as a committee member on behalf of the agricultural constituency: Mumbai HC

-Report by Arunima Jain The Mumbai High Court on Friday upheld that any individual representing an agricultureconstituency whilst running for candidature must understand the meaning of being a memberof the...

A CHALLENGE TO THE DECISION MADE UNDER CPC ORDER 37 RULE 4 IS NOT ADMISSIBLE UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1

-Report by Sejal Jethva ZAFAR BADYARI VS. SANDEEP SINGH, in this matter, the appellant/defendant seeks to challenge the decision made by the learned, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, according to Order 43 Rule 1 read...

Undertrials’ strip searches are humiliating and violate their fundamental right to privacy, according to a Mumbai Court

-Report by Utkarsh Kamal In this case, we are going to discuss the rights of the prisoners, and also as the fundamental right ( right to privacy) of a prisoner...

MEMBER OF ZILLA PARISHAD DISQUALIFIED FOR USING HIS POWER FOR PERSONAL INTEREST

-Report by Nehha Mishra In the case of VIRENDRA SINGH VS THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, the appellant was disqualified under Sections 40 and 16(1)(i) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961....

RAPIDLY CHANGING ECONOMICS OF SUCH SOURCES LED UNION GOVERNMENT TO REALISE THAT SOLAR AND OTHER RENEWABLES CAN TRANSFORM ENERGY LANDSCAPE: SC

-Report by Mehul Jain It was held by the Supreme Court of India in the case of GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED & ORS VS RENEW WIND ENERGY (RAJKOT) PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS that on April 13, it held that...