Tag: #law

About the Organization

A global British firm that manufactures consumer goods, Unilever plc is based in London. Food, condiments, ice cream, cleaning supplies, cosmetics, and personal care items are all produced by Unilever. The largest soap manufacturer in the world, Unilever, with products sold in almost 190 nations.

About the Responsibilities  

For an internship that will last between three and six months, Unilever is hiring legal interns for the Chennai Regional Office.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may apply from here: –  sanjukta.venkatesh@unilever.com

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

INTRODUCTION

Water is indispensable to life. Human beings can survive for 3 weeks without food, but only three days without water. Moreover, there may be no food cultivation without water. Conceptually, therefore, the right to life, considered the foremost basic and fundamental of all rights, must include within it a right to water. The right to water evolved from initial references to water in numerous international treaties, including the Convention on the Elimination of All types of Discrimination against Women, 1979, the Convention on the Rights of the kid, 1990, and therefore the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2008. Ultimately, in 2010, the international organization (“U.N.”) General Assembly adopted resolutions on the “Human Right to Water and Sanitation” and on the “Human Rights and Access to Safe beverage and Sanitation” emphasizing recognition of the “right to water”. We now have a separate right to water. In 2002, the U.N. Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (“E.S.C.R”.) adopted General Comment 15 noting that “The right to water is indispensable for leading a life with human dignity”. The Committee also defined the core content of the “right to water” to incorporate “everyone’s right to sufficient, safe, acceptable and physically accessible and affordable water for private and domestic uses”.

BACKGROUND

Historically, Dalits have sought integration and respect within mainstream Hindu caste society which has been denied to them for hundreds of years, in accordance with the dominant development paradigm. On the opposite hand, Adivasis have sought development on their terms outside mainstream Indian society. As a result, Dalit articulation of the “right to water” seeks not only to secure state provisioning of water within the traditional vertical exercise of their rights against the state but also to make sure enforcement of access to it water provision through the horizontal application of the correct in legal code against upper castes that block such access. For Adivasis, however, articulation of the “right to water” is inextricably linked to their rights to land and forest, seen as a part of one indivisible ecosystem.

Apart from the judicial articulation of a generally applicable “right to water”, I also describe the articulation of this right on behalf of two marginalized groups. the primary group includes Dalits or Scheduled Castes that constitute 16% of India’s population, who have historically faced systematic discrimination within mainstream Hindu society supported their caste. Originating in ancient India, and transformed by medieval elites, and later by British colonial rule, the class structure in India was a system of conditions that consigned people in several castes to different hereditary occupations, positions, and ways of life. Dalits or untouchables were placed outside the societal hierarchy and were denied access to common sources like food and water. The other group includes Adivasis or indigenous peoples which includes 8.6% of India’s population, who are historically marginalized because they need to live largely in geographical isolation in hills and forests with distinct cultures outside the society.

The right to life is continuously expanded, which has the proper to possess a clean environment and also the right to health, and after your time court mentioned that it also includes the correct to water. after we analyze various judgments of the Indian court, we will find that they need not only considered the correct to urge water as a fundamental right, but the court has also mentioned that water should be social asset.

Right to water was added to the extended interpretation of the proper to life under article 21 of the Indian constitution within the judgment of the case of Peoples Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India & Ors. W.P. (Civil) No. 196 / 2001. This judgment created a precedent that seeped all the way down to rock bottom levels of court.

The country of India hosts a large population that further creates a large demand for basic life necessities like water. However, this demand goes with major disappointment for people because of the severe scarcity of water. consistent with the 2017 UNICEF report, India’s two-thirds districts among the 718 districts, were reported to be under-supplied with water, with groundwater becoming scarcer a day

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT, 1974

Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 is the primary enacted by the parliament in relevance to the protection and preservation of the environment. The water act came into force to make sure the restoration of the water, where the domestic and industrial effluents pollute water with no precautionary measures. The Constitution of the Central Pollution Board and State Pollution control panel is empowered under the act to perform various functions like establishing the standard, research, and investigation of the bodies creating pollution to the water bodies. The awareness about promoting the cleanliness of water streams, well and rivers is also raised by this Act. And also, one every of the most purpose of building this act was to stop and control the pollution of water.

One of the provisions of this act provides that nobody can establish any industry which discharges sewages or trades effluents into the water bodies without the permission of the state board. But within the case of Province Pollution board II v. Prof. M. V. Nayudu it had been held by Supreme Court that Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 doesn’t provide an exemption to the state for exempting the establishment of personal body or polluting industries creating pollution to the water bodies.

PROVISIONS OF ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986

Environment Protection Act has got force on19th of November 1986. The name environment protect act itself provides the most objective of the act as protection of the environment. This act provides power to the Central Government to require appropriate measures so as to shield and improve the environment.

INDIAN EASEMENT ACT, 1882

The Indian Easement Act came into force on the 1st day of July 1882. Under this Act, the word Easement is defined in Section 4. But normally term easement means “right to enjoyment”. The rights of Riparian owners are recognized under this Act. A riparian owner is the one who has his land nearby the river or a stream.

Even after various legislations are passed the river water in India are continuously polluted River Ganga despite being worshiped by almost a billion people of this country is included among the foremost polluted river of the identical, variant liters of chemical waste is disposed of in these waters by the industries including the pollutants like cyanide, zinc, copper, lead, cadmium, and mercury including sewage waters also which is that the biggest pollutant These pollutants are so poisonous that they not only kill fishes instantly but other animals also. When these poisonous pollutants are disposed of in water it reduces the standard of water and makes them useless for drinking.

In the case of M C Mehta vs. State of Orrisa and Ors, a writ petition was filed for shielding the health of thousands of individuals living within town Cuttack and therefore the other areas which were adjacent thereto, which were plagued by the pollution caused by disposition discharged into the river by a municipal committee of Cuttack and SCB Medical Collage Hospital, also the State Pollution Board in its report concluded that the water within the city wasn’t fit human consumption and even bathing, The Apex court ordered to require immediate steps to manage the present situation and a responsible municipal corporation was formulated by the court for effective management of pollutants within the city’s beverage.

The government also because the Boards established under the legislation should attend to those matters not just by providing fines to the individuals polluting water but through imprisonment.

The case of Vikash Bansal vs Delhi pollution control committee marks an exceptional judgment given by the supreme court because, during this case of Haryana Paneer Bhandar, an offender was imprisoned for a period of 1 year with 1 Lakh Rupees fine together with 2.5 lakhs Rupees to tend to the PM relief fund, but what must be noticed during this judgment is that this case isn’t associated with any criminal offense like rape, murder, robbery or assault whereas it had been a case associated with the environment that’s polluting the river of Yamuna.

These types of convictions are seen as very rare and in line with me, the court must make such convictions more frequently so as to safeguard the environment from degrading further.

CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION

Not only a private can approach through the provisions of the legislations associated with the Environment but also through filing a Public Interest Litigation Now, pollution of water is worried to a bigger public, and any dispute associated with water may be settled through filing a Public Interest Litigation. Public Interest Litigation is filed through Article 32 of the Constitution of India which provides about the proper Constitutional Remedies and thru Article 226 of the Constitution of India which provides about the ability of the court to issue certain writ Public Interest Litigation may be filed through Section 122 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which provides about common nuisance. Public Interest Litigation will be converted into writ and the other way around.

CASE DECISION

Right to induce clean water isn’t an enumerated right under the Constitution of India. This right was brought to light through various judicial pronouncements and has become an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. And also, in the case of Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal, the Supreme Court held that the court is guaranteed to bear in mind Article 21 which offers about Right to life and private liberty, and Article 48A which provides the basic duties and Article 51A. (g) which provides about the Directive Principles of State Policy whenever a case associated with environmental problem is brought before such court.

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION

Central Water Commission was established to perform various functions including the initiation, coordination, and consultation of the authorities within the matter associated with the preservation, control, utilization, and distribution of water resources to the citizens of India. The central water commission is now part of the state of India. It makes sure the utilization of water resources appropriately so as to regulate floods, and droughts, maintain irrigation, and provide potable, etc.

In recent time, thanks to Covid-19, there has been large control on the pollution not only to the water bodies but also control of pollution, noise, pollution, etc. the govt. must take this as a chance to stop any more pollution of the water bodies by bringing various other legislation or simply by improving the provisions of the present legislation. The provisions of current legislation shall be made stricter which creates fear within the minds of individuals from further polluting the environment.

CONCLUSION

Water isn’t a personal asset and is the main essential ingredient for the survival of the people. It’s important to regulate pollution caused to the river water, streams, wells, etc. because India includes a total of only 4% of the world’s H2O, uses 80% of that merely for farming, and using polluted water for farming will adversely affect the health of people. The second most populated country within the world is additionally home to thousands of ethnic and tribal groups which survive on the character or jungle for his or her food and water including the little streams of water from major rivers, the presence of chemical pollutants are incredibly harmful moreover as deadly in some cases. And also, the right to induce clean water isn’t an enumerated right but could be a right enforced under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

 Hence Right to induce a clean beverages is additionally considered a a fundamental right and no one can deprive of such a right. If this right is empty a person, the one that has been aggrieved of those rights contains a right to approach under different provisions provided under the varied legislations. Different reasonable protection must even be given to major rivers and their connecting tanneries because these pollutants are directly affecting the habitat prospering around these rivers.

This article is written by Ashutosh Banshwar, a student of School of Law, Sharda University.

Introduction

When it comes to the scale of its energy economy, as determined by the total income of energy corporations, India is ranked fifth among all nations. According to a recent report by British Business Energy, the nation also ranks third in terms of investments in and future plans for renewable energy.

A major turning point in the global effort to combat climate change has been India’s statement that it plans to achieve net zero emissions by 2070 and to fulfill 50% of its electricity requirements from renewable sources by the year 2030. India is setting the bar for a novel approach to economic growth that might steer clear of the carbon-intensive strategies many nations have previously taken and serve as a model for other emerging markets.

The term “renewable energy” describes power produced from renewable resources such as the sun, wind, and water. They aid in lowering environmental pollutants and are comparatively clean. 

Currently, India’s installed renewable energy capacity—which includes big hydro—stands at more over 159.95 Giga Watts, or nearly 40% of the nation’s total capacity, having grown 396% in the past 8.5 years (as on 31st March 2022). The potential for renewable energy in India may be increased up to several times greater than it is now. Considering the immense resources at its disposal and the rapidly expanding population, India has been reticent to publicly advocate for the use of renewable energy sources.

Acts, policies, and programs promoting Renewable Energy development in India

The first piece of legislation to address the use of renewable energy sources in the production of electricity was the Electricity Act of 2003. This law made it possible to construct captive wind farms (i.e. independent generation of power for personal uses). Additionally, it developed specialized tools for implementing policy, such as favorable tariffs, renewable purchasing requirements, and tradable renewable energy certificates. The State Power Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) are required by Section 61(h) of the Electricity Act, 2003 to promote grid connection of the electricity produced from renewable resources through tariff rules. The State Commission is required by Section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act of 2003 to promote cogeneration, the production of electricity from renewable energy sources, and the timely updating of the National Tariff Policy and Tariff Policy for the best possible utilization of both conventional and non-conventional sources.

The Ministry of Power oversees the application of the Electrical Act and principally exercises administrative control over the growth of the nation’s electricity industry. However, the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, which serves as the government’s main body for all issues connected to the development of renewable energy, is in charge of overseeing the development and expansion of renewable energy in India.

Even if the Electricity Act does not define renewable energy, there are other laws and regulations that do, both at the federal and state levels. A 2017 regulation known as the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff Determination from Renewable Energy Sources) Regulations defines “renewable energy” as grid-quality electricity produced from renewable energy sources. The phrase “renewable energy sources” has also been defined to include small hydro, wind, and solar, including its integration with a combined cycle, biomass, cogeneration of biofuels, urban or municipal waste, and other sources that the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy may deem appropriate. Additionally, by virtue of an official letter dated 8 March 2019, the Ministry of Power has officially classed hydropower project stations as having a capacity of more than 25 MW as a renewable energy source.

The 2005 National Electrical Policy, In particular, emphasizes making the most of the nation’s hydropower potential. Its goals include developing rules for the power sector’s rapid development, ensuring that all areas had access to electricity, and utilizing technology to access these resources. In accordance with Section 3 of the Electricity Act of 2003, this policy was created in the year 2005. It permits favorable pricing for electricity generated using renewable resources. It has achieved its prior goal of generating enough power to guarantee access and raise the minimum annual per-capita availability to 1,000 kWh by 2012. To ensure returns and full recovery during the loan repayment period for the entire useful life, which is equivalent to a Levelized tariff, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) established yearly feed-in-tariffs under the National Tariff Policy for connectivity by grid power from various renewable energy resources. In order to promote grid connectivity, many incentive schemes for renewable energy sources were put in place during the 11th Five Year Plan, which runs from 2007 to 2012.

The proposed National Renewable Energy Act, 2015, whose draft has been made available for public review, aims to grant the Government of India broad authority to advance the renewable energy sector in India. This Act was created in 2015 with the intention of promoting renewable energy sources. This Act aims to promote the use of renewable energy, lessen reliance on fossil fuels, guarantee energy security, and cut back on local and global pollution. It sought to support efforts to combat climate change, foster an environmentally friendly environment, and develop pollution-free energy sources. The usage of renewable energy will lower CO2 and other harmful pollution emissions as well as those from greenhouse gases. The Act also helps to ensure that the goals of expanding the percentage of renewable energy sources at the national and international levels are met.

Electricity is a heavily regulated industry in India. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions are established at the federal and state levels of government under the Electricity Act. Disputes between generators and distribution licensees or between distribution licensees and customers may be heard by the commissions, which also have the authority to enact rules and subsidiary laws. Before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL), a specialized body to assess electricity-related disputes, central or state commission rulings may be challenged. The Supreme Court of India will hear appeals of APTEL judgments.

The judiciary in our nation has frequently dealt with concerns involving renewable energy sources. The Supreme Court recently declared in 2015 that all sectors must adopt goals relating to renewable sources of energy or face penalties. This historic Supreme Court decision requires companies with captive power plants to derive a significant share of their energy needs from renewable sources. This decision also gave the state electrical regulators and related organizations the authority to impose sanctions on businesses that disobey the Supreme Court’s directives.

The necessity for research and development initiatives in the area of renewable energy was recognized by the government. A Commission for Additional Sources of Energy (CASE) was created by the government in 1981. The mission of CASE is to advance research and development in the area of renewable energy.

A subsequent creation was the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy. India became the first nation to have a dedicated ministry for the advancement of renewable energy sources.

To encourage farmers to employ solar energy, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) granted financial help up to USD 6.5 billion by 2022.

The second phase of the Atal Jyoti Yojana (AJAY) initiative was launched in 2018 with the goal of providing financial assistance for the installation of more than 3 million solar street lights in certain locations.

In order to encourage large-grid-connected wind-solar PV hybrid systems for the most effective and efficient use of land and transmission infrastructure, the MNRE created the National Wind-Solar Hybrid Policy in 2018.

To encourage local solar cell manufacture, the government imposes the Safeguard Duty (SGD) on solar panels. Thus, these were a few of the most important measures that the Indian government took in an effort to advance, study, and grow the renewable energy industry.

The Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2020 was proposed by the federal government to make revisions aimed at advancing the renewable energy industry. For example, the establishment of the Electricity Contract Enforcement Authority, which will have the sole authority to decide disputes arising from power purchase agreements, the imposition of penalties on distribution licensees for failing to comply with renewable purchase obligations, and the federal government’s authority to announce a National Renewable Energy Policy and prescribe a minimum renewable purchase obligation.

It is anticipated that this law, the draft National Electricity Policy 2021, and other policies would implement the necessary adjustment to improve energy efficiency in order to satisfy technological improvements and climate change objectives.

Issues and Challenges

In areas pertaining to renewable energy, coordination between the federal and state governments has not been strong. Due to this, there have been problems with land acquisition for central and state projects including renewable energy, as well as uncertainty, delays, and poor management of auctions and transmission links. A widespread issue in India is aggressive rate caps during auctions and retroactive re-negotiations. For international investors, sovereign risk is a source of worry.

Another major worry is late payments from state-owned distribution businesses that are heavily indebted. Financial limitations apply to smaller renewable energy producers. The financial support for renewable energy sources is being hampered by India’s stranded or non-performing assets in the thermal power industry. Transmission networks and balancing capacity are slowly growing throughout the nation.

Recommendations

To effectively exploit the nation’s undiscovered renewable resources, a comprehensive plan on renewable energy is required, including both supply and usage as well as suitable transportation. Tariff limitations have made renewable energy policies problematic. In order to assure the financial feasibility of high-quality projects, the price limitations must be adjusted. Analyzing the industries’ risk assessments and tariff expectations should be done to accomplish this. The government needs to take steps to reduce project-related risks.

The federal government needs to make efforts to make the most of the nation’s bioenergy potential. The manufacture of solar products in the nation has enormous potential. By providing amenities like greater solar tariff caps and by promoting exports, the government may play a crucial part in its expansion. The government should seek to modernize and expand the transmission network while taking into account the connecting requirements of significant hubs for renewable energy.

Solar and wind power equipment should only be subject to one uniform rate of GST. For businesses involved in renewable energy, access to money both domestically and abroad needs to be improved. Due to the current situation’s inefficiency problems, the electricity distribution industry has to be privatized.

Conclusion

The Indian government is aiming to achieve its goal of increasing the country’s proportion of renewable energy. The MNRE is continuously trying to put the policies into effect. Several problems need to be resolved. They can be readily stopped, though, if the right actions are followed. The tariff rates set by foreign investors ought to be reviewed by the government. In order to guarantee effectiveness and quality, the renewable energy sector needs to be competitive and privatized. The manufacture and use of renewable energy have grown quickly throughout the years in the energy industry. Although this sector is not specifically covered by any legislation, it is collectively governed by the current laws. However, in order to make the system effective and prevent more confrontations, it is advised and optimistic that sector-specific laws be developed and passed as soon as possible. In conclusion, India has performed admirably thus far, but there is still potential for growth. If all goes according to plan, India will take the top spot in the world for renewable energy.

References

1. Deepak Sriram Krishnan, “India’s Supreme Court Reinforces Renewable Energy Targets for Industry”, World Resources Institute ( June 13 2020, 08:00 pm) India’s Supreme Court Reinforces Renewable Energy Targets for Industry | World Resources Institute (wri.org)
2. Integrated Energy Policy – Policies – IEARenewable Energy | Make In India
3. Renewable Energy in India – Indian Power Industry Investment (investindia.gov.in)
4. List of Policies and Acts – National Portal for Renewable Purchase Obligation (rpo.gov.in)

This article is written by Devishee Arora, a 4th-year B.COM LLB (Hons.) student at Amity Law School, Noida.

About the Organization

Honlet Legum Arbitration is a law business that offers corporations, States, and State entities individualised and specialised services in international arbitration for both commercial arbitration and arbitration under investment treaties.

About the Responsibilities  

Interns are being sought by Honlet Legum Arbitration on a full-time basis for a period of six months beginning in July 2023 and January 2024. Before September 26, 2022, applicants for July 2023 should send their applications.

Successful candidates will speak English with ease and have outstanding legal academic credentials.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may apply from here: –  

CVs and cover letters to antoine.weber@honletlegum.com and clara.motin@honletlegum.com

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

Introduction

Covids are a gathering of contaminations that can cause infections like the ordinary crisp, outrageous extraordinary respiratory condition (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory issue (MERS). In 2019, another Covid was recognized as the justification for a sickness discharge that started in China.

The contamination is known as outrageous extreme respiratory condition Covid 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The disease it causes is called Covid ailment 2019 (COVID-19). In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) broadcasted the COVID-19 episode as a pandemic.

General prosperity get-togethers, including the U.S. Places for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and WHO, are actually looking at the COVID-19 pandemic and posting investigates their locales. These social occasions have also given propositions for thwarting and treating the contamination that causes COVID-19.¹

The overall pandemic that has caused lockdowns in different nations all around the planet has caused aggravation in all highlights of life for an uncertain period. Social isolating has emerged as the most momentous weapon to condense the spread of this uncommonly irresistible contamination in the overall population generally speaking. Regardless, these social eliminating commands have reshaped and changed various endeavors all around the planet.

The Indian authentic scene has furthermore been vexed and genuinely impacted by this pandemic. Again with the social isolating responsibilities and the country again under lockdown orders, regulation workplaces in India and the Indian lawful structure have expected to close their approaches to the general populace. Eventually, considering that a complete conclusion of the Indian value structure is horrendous, the law workplaces have done work-from-home procedures, however, the legitimate directors have embraced development by coordinating hearings through video conferencing.²

The Supreme Court of India on 14.03.2020 expressed that from 16.03.2020 just dire issues will be thought about. The SC has moreover planned that super the lawyers following up with respect to this present circumstance, i.e., either for disputes or presenting oral perspectives or to help, close by one litigant just, will be permitted in the court. The SC has moreover guaranteed all power to require warm screening at all members and to deny entry to individuals found to have high inside heat levels. In addition to this, the Supreme Court vide Suo Moto Writ Petition no. 1 of 2020, has similarly raised the issue of illness of Covid-19 disease in confinement offices. The realization of desperate issues is done through video conferencing by presenting an application called “Vidyo” (informed by Supreme Court vide fliers dated 23.03.2020 and 26.03.2020). Likewise, Supreme Court vide Suo Moto Writ Petition no. 3 of 2020 expanded the Limitation period for all of the cases w.e.f. fifteenth March 2020 till extra arrangements of the Supreme Court. All tries are been expected to manage value in the country.³

Changes to the Indian Legal System

The Indian Judiciary has been overburdened for a seriously significant time frame, and COVID-19 is simply adding to this danger. As of May 27, 2020, there is generally 3.24 crore approaching cases in India’s subordinate courts and around 48.2 lakh impending cases in the High Courts. The Supreme Court, vide its notification dated March 13, 2020, restricted working of the Court to “squeezing matters” so to speak.

High Courts additionally have restricted their working to basic issues. In the customary course, a High Court hears in excess of 400 issues each day. As indicated by data accumulated from Daily Cause Lists of various High Courts, since late March, High Courts in the country over are hearing wherever between 10-100 matters consistently.

Subordinate courts address over 80% of approaching cases. On June 2, the Karnataka High Court extended the finish of all area courts, family courts, work courts, and current chambers in the state till July 6. On April 29, the Punjab and Haryana High Court mentioned that all area and sub-divisional Courts in Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh will work “restrictively” from May 1 “till the lockdown/time impediment is in force in the specific locale”. These restrictive measures have provoked an overabundance of impending cases, thusly growing the load on courts.⁴

The pandemic has channelized the ability of under-utilized gadgets and elective work models (like virtual hearings). Customary ways to deal with working have been changed and recognized at a stunning speed and without any problem.

With a very restricted ability to concentrate time, graduate schools had changed to electronic coaching and learning, the Courts had relied upon the Virtual Courts System and regulation workplaces are continuing to work from home giving development to be a lifeline for the Indian genuine scene.

The impact of the pandemic has been essentially tracked down in the Indian courts. To adhere to the social isolating guidelines and to control the spread of the second surge of this overwhelming contamination, the Indian Courts have relied upon Virtual Hearings in Virtual Court Rooms to guarantee that the association of value stays undisturbed. A most recent model that can be referred to here is that of Justice Jasmeet Singh of the Delhi High Court who carried on the virtual hearing beyond 11 pm on Monday, 21st June 2021 to complete the issues recorded before him!

The model similarly suggests that having changed the Indian legitimate scene by taking on development during this marvelous overall crisis, the Indian Legal System has completed and guarded our old-fashioned custom – Justice, at all Costs, Always!⁵

The impact of the pandemic has been altogether tracked down in the Indian courts. To adhere to social isolating norms and to control the spread of the second surge of this overpowering disease, the Indian Courts have again relied upon Virtual Court Rooms to ensure that the association of value stays consistent. It ought to be seen that, the possibility of Virtual Courts is certainly not a unique thought in India. In 2003, the Supreme Court of India in State of Maharashtra v. Prafulla Desai held that recording of confirmation by a Court through video conferencing will be seen ‘as per the procedure spread out by guideline’. From there on out, a couple of subordinate Courts in India have recently illustrated rules in such a manner and have held legitimate methods through video conferencing.²

Without a doubt, even free genuine aide — dependable under the Constitution — is out of reach to an enormous number of regardless of the National Legal Services Authority’s organization that there should be one legitimate organization’s office for a reasonable bundle of towns. The IJR reveals that extensively, there is only a solitary office for 42 towns. In states like UP and Odisha, there is only one for more than 500 and 300 towns independently.

Methodology makers and commitment holders need to orchestrate attempts across police prisons’ lawful chief and authentic manual for recognizing squeezing repairs than can be set missing fundamentally more weight on resources. Illustratively, ensure assortment – has the first call while enlisting, center around resources so genuine organizations are open at the doorway step of the remotest estates and towns: this could mean growing the number of police chowkies in country districts to placing assets into quick skilling up of judges, constables, board lawyers, and jailors who are individuals ready to come in case of an emergency.

The Supreme Court has, again and again, affirmed that permission to value is a significant right. Its affirmation has fumbled and unnecessarily extended. The transport of significant worth value ought to now be seen as on a very basic level significant and become truly in the presence of everyone.⁶

Conclusion

This piece has recently covered a part of the repercussions of COVID-19 on the legitimate calling and there are various locales, for instance, genuine preparation which moreover ought to be tended to on truly significant. The ongoing concedes in the general arrangement of regulations might be exacerbated by the snags COVID-19 will present to the progression of assessments, charging decisions, pre-primer cycles, etc.

Clearly, the Coronavirus is putting down profound roots, and the Judiciary needs to adjust to it. Normal working or rather “new standard” working of courts will take as much time as required. Preferably, it shouldn’t accept unreasonably extended, in the event that Lady Justice will in a little while need to, close by a blindfold, cutting edge and scales, be decorated with a facial covering.⁴

---

References:

1. Kohli, Rusy. [Online] https://www.barandbench.com/columns/from-the-bubonic-plague-to-covid-19-impact-on-the-legal-profession-in-india.
2. College, Asian Law. [Online] https://alc.edu.in/blog/changes-in-justice-delivery-system-in-pandemic-virtual-hearings/.
3. Daruwala, Maja. [Online] https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/how-covid-pandemic-hit-the-justice-system-101614554343346.html.

This article is written by Cheshta Bhardwaj, a student of Delhi Metropolitan Education (GGSIPU).

About the Responsibilities  

An offline internship opportunity is available in our Noida office. Noida-based candidates are preferable.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may apply from here: –  team.achievers.legal@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organization

A full-service law practise, Mind Legal is the ideal synthesis of years of actual expertise and profound theoretical and conceptual knowledge. The Delhi-based firm was established by a group of highly skilled, disciplined, and passionate young visionaries that combine their tremendous energy and global exposure to provide swift solutions to each and every client.

About the Responsibilities  

We are happy to let you know that Mind Legal, Advocates and Consultants, New Delhi, is accepting applications for an in-office legal internship during the months of September and October. The following will receive preference:

• Students who are in their second or third year of a five-year course, third year, or fourth year (3 year course).
• Well-versed in Indian laws, including criminal, corporate, and civil law.
• Has strong research abilities and speaks English well.
• Be a Delhi-NCR resident.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may apply from here: –  info@mindlegal.in, shreya@mindlegal.in

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

About the Organization

Debt recovery, litigation and dispute resolution, mergers and acquisitions, contract management, employment law, intellectual property rights, policy and regulatory advice, due diligence, deal management, consumer protection, labour law incorporations, certifications, compliances, etc. are all areas of expertise for the boutique law firm LPJ & Partners LLP.

About the Responsibilities  

LPJ & PARTNERS LLP is seeking interns interested in pursuing litigation as a career after graduation.

Stipend

Long-term internships with stipends will be granted to promising interns.

How to Apply?

Interested candidates may apply from here: –  office@lpjpartners.com

Disclaimer: All information posted by us on Lexpeeps is true to our knowledge. But still, it is suggested that you check and confirm things on your level.

For regular updates, we can catchup at-

WhatsApp Group:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/G4bxdgRGHY8GRzOPSHrVwL

Telegram:

https://t.me/lexpeeps

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/lexpeeps-in-lexpeeps-pvt-ltd

INTRODUCTION

In India, the online gaming market has exploded in recent years, raising concerns about its legality and the need for regulation. The legality of numerous games, including Rummy, online poker, and fantasy games like Dream 11, has been in question. Moreover, playing real-money games comes with a lot of psychological and financial risks. Numerous states and courts have made vain attempts to control the gaming industry. Understanding and creating appropriate regulations is crucial to establishing some order in the gaming industry.

Large Indian gaming enterprises now face a hefty financial burden because there is no unified national gambling regulation. One of India’s fastest-growing businesses would get a great boost from the creation of a harmonious national gaming industry with clear actionable guidelines. 

On April 1, 2022, the Online Gambling (Regulation) Bill, 2022 (the “Bill”) was introduced in the Lok Sabha to create an efficient regulatory framework for the online gaming business to stop fraud and abuse. The Bill proposes the establishment of a regulatory body to oversee the online gaming business, acknowledging the impacts of online gaming’s addictive qualities and the sector’s significant national influence.

ASPECTS OF THE ACT

With the help of the Bill, an Online Gaming Commission (referred to as “the Commission”) will be created, and a licensing system will be put in place that would require licenses from the Commission to provide and run gaming enterprises in India. According to the Bill, it is now illegal to sell and run gaming companies without a license. There is also a bond requirement. Anyone found to have participated in gaming on an unlicensed website will also be subject to legal repercussions under the Bill.

The Commission will have the authority to keep an eye on the operation of websites that offer online gaming and to take action to stop illegal online gaming. Additionally, the Commission will create rules and regulations governing the license and permit requirements, authorization for players to use gaming websites, requirements for providing gaming services, terms for player credit facilities, fines or penalties, and any other matter it may deem appropriate.

The Bill’s highlights

Any game played on an electronic device, such as a personal computer, a mobile phone, a tablet, or another device, is considered “online gaming” under the Bill. It is clear that the Bill seeks to regulate all games played on these electronic devices because the term does not distinguish between “game of skill” and “game of chance.”

The bill calls for the establishment of an oversight body called the Online Gaming Commission (OGC), which will have five members appointed by the central government and include at least one expert in each of the fields of law, cyber technology, and law enforcement. The OGC will have the authority to, among other things, supervise the operations of online gaming websites, produce periodic or one-time reports on related subjects, recommend appropriate steps to control and stop illegal online gaming, grant, suspend, and revoke licenses for such websites, and set fees for license applications and renewals of such websites.

Playing online games without a website and a non-transferable, non-assignable license would be prohibited under the proposed legislation. Without the appropriate license, operating an online gaming server or website is punishable by up to three years in prison and a fine. Six years will pass before the license expires.

If the licensee violates any of the license’s terms or Bill’s provisions, the license that is proposed to be issued under the Bill may be suspended or revoked. The Bill does not, however, apply to anyone who offers backend services in India, such as hosting and upkeep for any international gaming website based outside of India.

QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BILL

Although the Bill seeks to regulate online gaming in India through numerous checks and balances, it currently suffers from several drawbacks:

1. The difference between “games of skill” and “games of chance” is absent from the Bill. Furthermore, it is unclear from the Bill if its rules exclusively apply to for-real-money games or also apply to games played for free.
2. Although this Bill intends to be the primary piece of law controlling gaming in India, it will eventually be subject to court review because, according to the Indian Constitution, neither gaming nor gambling are federal topics and may only be regulated by state governments.
3. The conflict between the present licensing system and the state gaming laws of Meghalaya, Nagaland, and Sikkim is not addressed by the Bill.
4. The Know Your Customer (KYC) standards, customer complaint procedures, advertising and marketing regulations, user data protection, responsible gambling rules, and other issues have not been addressed by the bill.

Games of chance versus games of skill

The Constitution’s seventh schedule, List II (state list), section 34, is titled “Betting and Gambling.” the states alone have the authority to enact laws governing “games of chance.” Contrary to “games of chance,” “games of skill” are protected by Article 19 (1) (g) of the constitution.

Games of skill are not considered gambling under the gambling regulations of several states. There are several uncertainties when attempting to distinguish between a “game of chance” and a “game of skill.” In the absence of legislation defining a “game of skill,” courts have occasionally established definitions for the term.

RMDC v. State of Bombay and KR Lakshmanan v. State of Tamil Nadu

The supreme court ruled in RMDC v. State of Bombay and KR Lakshmanan v. State of Tamil Nadu that a game of skill is one in which the element of talent outweighs the element of chance. A game can be categorized as a game of skill or chance depending on the facts and circumstances of each case, the court ruled in Manoranjitham Manamyil Mandram v. State of Tamil Nadu.

The Kerala High Court ruled that playing for stakes or not is not a factor in assessing whether a game is one of skill or chance when it dismissed a notification that sought to outlaw online Rummy when played for money. “Players have the right to support themselves with their talents.”

Online skill-based gaming is legal.

Using their jurisdiction under Entry 26 of List II, the states of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala made changes to outlaw all types of internet gaming, including skill-based games, in their respective states. They cited an increase in cases of youth suicide, gaming addiction, and financial loss.

States are outlawing online gaming for the reasons listed below:

1. Online games are prone to addiction, and if played for money, they can cause users to commit suicide.
2. instances of children committing murder and crimes to make up for losses from online gaming
3. Websites can manipulate online gaming.

Because they violate the basic right to engage in commerce, business, and occupation, these changes have been brought up in court as being unconstitutional.

As a result, the rules outlawing skill-based gaming have all been overturned by the Madras High Court, Kerala High Court, and Karnataka High Court. Although governments have the sole authority to enact laws governing skill-based gambling, courts have cited the following as key justifications: 

1. A complete prohibition on skill gaming is arbitrary, unlawful, and in violation of Article 19 (1). (g).
2. Additionally, both Article 19 (1) (a) and Article 21 mention participating in games and sports of skill.
3. Such a ban is out of proportion to the goal that governments are trying to accomplish.
4. There are no scientific studies or data about the negative effects of real-money gambling supplied by the states to support complete prohibition.
5. The stakes in the game do not affect a player’s ability to use their skills to their advantage and support themselves financially.

India needs to regulate internet gaming

There are no regulatory frameworks in place for India’s online gaming sector. There is uncertainty over tax rates and revenue collection in the lack of any comprehensive legislation. Currently, several states have rules governing online gambling inside their borders, but due to the industry’s rapid expansion, there is a need for federal legislation that would apply to the entire nation. An effective regulatory system would also promote economic growth and other advantages.

The Online Gaming (Regulation) Bill 2022 has been introduced in Parliament to address the issues and guarantee the expansion of the online gaming sector. According to Article 249 of the Constitution, the Center may pass laws on state subjects provided they are in the “national interest.” This legislation aims to establish a central body for regulating and supervising internet gaming in India.

The 2022 ONLINE GAMING (REGULATION) BILL

A private member’s bill titled Online Gaming (Regulation) Bill, 2022 was presented in Lok Sabha.

While preserving the integrity of online gaming, the measure aims to establish a regulated framework for it.

Online gaming is defined as games played on any electronic device in Section 2(e) of the bill. A central government-created “online gaming commission” would be established under the proposed legislation as an oversight body to develop guidelines for online gaming, including licensing requirements and reporting requirements. Playing without a license is a crime that carries a fine. Any license requirement that is broken will result in license revocation.

The Know Your Consumer (KYC) requirement, the grievance redressal system, data protection or privacy, and one of the key reasons for bringing forth such a bill, mental health issues including addiction and depression, are not addressed in the bill.

The current regulations also have a lot of problems. The distinction between “game of chance” and “game of skill” is not mentioned in the definition of online gaming, which is essential given the conflicts that have arisen in the past as a result of this lack of demarcation. Furthermore, real-money gaming needs to be regulated due to its rising popularity and potential for an increase in unlawful transactions, but the bill does not offer any precise guidelines in this regard.

There is a lack of a thorough licensing structure with precise rules. Although the bill represents a big step, it does not effectively address the problems related to online gambling. The bill must be clearer and more open.

CURRENT SCENARIO

Currently, the majority of businesses that offer real money games are supervised by charters given by the All India Gaming Federation (“AIGF”) and the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (“FIFS”), two self-regulatory organizations created to oversee online gaming in India. The lack of enabling national legislation is felt deeply even though these charters help to streamline the conduct and governance of online gambling platforms.

CONCLUSION

Since the start of the epidemic, online gaming has grown in popularity and involvement, especially among young people. While it has been good for the economy, there are societal, psychological, and legal ramifications for online gaming in India. The internet gaming sector is in a “grey area” because there aren’t clear distinctions and rules.

For a long time now, courts have dealt with these ambiguities. The country needs a well-regulated gaming industry if it is to fully realize its enormous economic potential. The recently proposed bill does not seem to be sufficient; the only way to guarantee everyone’s safety and privacy in one of India’s fastest-growing businesses is through a thorough legal system.

---

References:．

1. India’s Online Gaming Bill: Regressive Regulation – JURIST – Commentary – Legal News & Commentary [Online][Cited: 3 September 2022] https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2022/05/nishka-kapoor-online-gaming-bill-india/．

This article is written by Kanika Arora from Delhi Metropolitan Education (Affiliated to GGSIPU).

INTRODUCTION

According to the IPC, man’s relics are an integral part of the crime. However, these offenses fall under the general exceptions set out in Articles 76 to 106 of the Indian Penal Code, where there is no personal reason and the act is committed under clearly persuasive circumstances. As a result, perpetrators must be held accountable for their actions in court. Waivers are granted if the defense is successfully defended in court.  The insanity defense in a criminal case helps prove that the perpetrator was suffering from a serious mental disorder at the time of the examination. Because of this, the person may not be paying attention to their actions. Non-psychotics may, in certain circumstances¹, attempt to invoke the insanity defense to avoid paying a fine, but this is rare. Although the insanity defense was intended to improve justice, most people use it to avoid fines and other punishments. Such situations have no deterrent and are serious as people become more and more involved in such activities causing problems. 

MEANING OF INSANITY

Insanity is the inability of a person to understand the meaning of his actions or to realize that he is wrong or illegal. This alludes to mental illness, in which a person’s mental faculties are severely impaired and he is unable to comprehend the consequences of his actions. Insanity is difficult to define in a way that meets legal standards. For ordinary people, insanity is usually associated with mental illness or some kind of mental illness. 

According to Black’s Law Dictionary², any mental illness serious enough to deprive a person of legal capacity and exempt them from criminal or civil liability is considered insanity. “Mental illness,” “mental condition,” and “mental disorder” refer to illnesses that require psychiatric or psychological help, while insanity is a legal term. As a result, one can have a mental illness, illness, or disability without being legally considered insane. However, the reverse is also true.

INSANITY AS DEFENCE AND ITS TYPE

The defendant, who is defending himself on the charge of insanity, admits to having committed the crime but claims that his insanity absolves him of responsibility. It’s more of an explanation for what the person did than an apology. A defendant may raise this defense during a criminal trial in court. It has become necessary to determine the psychology of criminals. While criminal law focuses on the suspect’s “state of mind,” it also deals with “men’s rea.” Men’s rea is a legal term that focuses on a person’s mental health. It is necessary to consider not only the physical behavior of the offender but also the emotional state. The mental state of the mentally ill person prevents him from having criminal intentions, 

In the Indian criminal justice system, the ‘insanity defense is a strategy used to acquit criminal suspects. It is based on the idea that the person was suffering from a mental illness and could not understand his actions.

There are two kinds of reasons for him: 

Permanent Insanity: The condition in which a person is permanently insane. Past actions and experiences can indicate that a person is permanently insane and obscure the seriousness of the situation. 

Temporary Insanity: Occasional or temporary loss of consciousness. Examples of temporary insanity include depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and other temporary mental illnesses. There are two possible consequences of this transient madness: he is “insane and therefore innocent” and “guilty but insane and therefore not a crime”.³

To qualify for an exception under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, the suspect must have engaged in an illegal or unlawful act at the time the offense was suspected or he had a mentally ill comprehension and must indicate that when there is suspicion of a crime. No one is allowed to cite mental illness as a valid reason for committing a crime. The suspect’s mental state is so bad that he cannot fully comprehend the nature of the crime.⁴

REPERCUSSIONS OF SANITY DEFENCE

Insanity Defense has been misused time and time again, releasing guilty people under various scenarios of insanity and undermining the effectiveness of the rule of law. Due to the prevalence of misuse, many countries have eliminated this defense including Germany, Argentina, Thailand, and much of the United Kingdom. It is difficult to prove insanity legally and requires concrete evidence, but it is easy to prove insanity medically. It is difficult to meet all the requirements of Section 84 to avoid criminal liability. Therefore, most insanity defense cases end with the defendant being criminally detained and punished. Mental illness defenses are commonly misused because it is difficult to determine whether a person was “healthy or unhealthy” at the time the crime was committed.

CRITICISM

Although rarely used in criminal cases, the defense of insanity remains controversial. The question of whether the defense of insanity is necessary often comes to our minds. Due to evidence of insanity, defendants charged with more gruesome and serious crimes cannot be found guilty of committing such crimes. If the defense alleges insanity, the suspect pleads guilty and demands a plea of ​​not guilty based on his mental state. Criminals sometimes pretend to be insane to avoid punishment. In reality, claiming an insanity defense is a dangerous defense at best. A basic rule of criminal law seems to be at stake. The insanity defense is based on the idea that punitive action is acceptable only if the accused deserves it. As a prerequisite for punishment, the perpetrator of the crime must bear the moral responsibility of being a moral agent. When a person’s mental illness is so severe that he can no longer control his irrational or compulsive behavior, he can no longer act as a moral agent would be unfair. 

Section 84 considers mental illness a cognitive impairment. Other types of mental illness are not admissible in court. Various mental illnesses can affect your ability to work to the point where you lose control of your activities. Many crimes are committed out of anger and emotion. A person can understand what he has done only after he has performed the act. However, his actions were governed by the emotions of the time. His cognitive abilities can be fairly normal.⁵

Although Section 84 seeks to provide appropriate treatment for mentally ill offenders, there are circumstances in which false acquittals or convictions are made. Therefore, broader ideas such as emotions, pre-action states, etc. should be included. The definition of legal insanity has been expanded to include other features of medical insanity. Instead of focusing on criminals, we need to focus on eliminating crime.  On the contrary, in the general interest of society, these criminals should not be released, given proper mental health evaluations to avoid false acquittals or convictions, and placed in psychiatric facilities. In all these situations, a psychiatrist should be consulted and an individual’s fate should not be left to the discretion of a single judge. Judges may be required by law to make certain decisions. He should get a medical opinion.

LANDMARK CASE LAWS

Ashirudeen Ahmed v. The King⁶ was intended to create a new test. It has been determined that to be eligible for protection under Section 84 of the IPC, 

1. a defendant must produce evidence of one of the following: 
2.  did not know that the act was illegal; 
3.  did not know that the act was illegal; 

Dayabhai ChhaganBhai Thakkar v State of Gujarat⁷ found that consideration of the defendant’s mental state depends on the period during which the crime was committed. If the suspect was in a  state of mind eligible for protection under Section 84 of the  IPC, only the events before, during, and after the crime can be used to make that determination.

The Supreme Court has indicated which diseases are covered by this defense and which are not included in her Bapu Gajraj Singh v State of Rajasthan⁸. By law, this defense does not apply to bizarre, selfish, or impatient behavior or illnesses that impair the intellect and affect emotions and willpower. Also, it is not enough for the defendant to experience occasional insanity or epileptic seizures but otherwise behave normally. 

In Hari Singh Gond v. State of Madhya Pradesh⁹ case, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 84 of the IPC is the legal standard of accountability in cases of suspected mental illness. Courts, on the other hand, have largely associated the phrase with insanity. But the definition of “madness” is vague. It is a term used to describe varying degrees of mental illness severity. Therefore, people with mental illness are not always exempt from criminal responsibility. A distinction must be made between medical insanity and legal insanity. Medical insanity is not a matter of court. It’s legal madness. 

In Surendra Mishra v. State of Jharkhand¹⁰, the Supreme Court held that “legal insanity,” not “medical insanity,” must be proven to acquit a suspect of criminal liability under section 84 of the IPC. 

CONCLUSION

The section on insanity deals with all forms of insanity, such as “temporary or permanent,” “natural or consequential,” and “caused by disease or birth,” and treats the suspect as the sole criterion for establishing criminal liability. completely dependent on the behavior of the person. As it is difficult to determine whether someone is mentally unstable at the time of a crime, it is also difficult to determine their mental health status. Also, defending oneself is quite a challenge for an insane person. In addition, rational individuals use this defense to avoid punishment. This state makes it difficult for the law to achieve its main purpose, turning it into a loophole. The fact that a court must determine a person’s truthfulness in itself a very difficult situation makes this rule an additional loophole.  Only legitimate entities should be allowed to use insanity defenses. Ultimately it is left to the discretion of the courts, but laws made in the public interest must be applied fairly. It is reasonable to assume that the laws on insanity no longer serve their original purpose and is being used by criminals as a defense against law enforcement. Indian courts have often sought a more progressive approach to enforcing the concept of “mental insanity” in criminal law in the light of advances in medicine, and psychiatry in particular.

---

References:

1. Parthasarathy Ramamurthy & Vijay Chatoth, How does India decides Insanity Plies? A review of the High Court judgements in the past decades, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_373_18 (Visited on May 29, 2021).
2. Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Ed., p.810.
3. Russell Covey, “Temporary Insanity: The Strange Life and Times of the perfect defense”, Available at: https://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/bulr/documents/covey.pdf (Visited on May 28, 2021).
4. Manas Shrivastava & Adatsa Hota, “Privacy and Legal Rights of People with Mental Illness”, available at: https://www.ijlmh.com/wp-content/uploads/Privacy-and-Legal-Rights-of-People-with-Mental-Illness.pdf (Visited on May 30, 2021).
5. Ashiruddin Ahmed v The King, 1949 CriLJ 255.
6. Dayabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar v. State of Gujarat AIR 1964 SC 1563.
7. Bapu Gajraj Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2007) 3 SCC Cri.509.
8. Hari Singh Gond v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2008) 16 SCC 109
9. Surendra Mishra v State of Jharkhand, AIR 2011 SC 627

This article is written by Jay Kumar Gupta, a second-year BBA LL.B.(Hons.) student at the School of Law, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Bangalore.