Tag: #DelhiHighCourt

NO MANDAMUS CAN BE ISSUED DIRECTING EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS TO ACT CONTRARY TO THEIR OWN PROCEDURE: DELHI HC

-Report by Himanshi Chauhan In the recent case of Ruksana v. Jawahar Lal Nehru University, a writ petition was filed, in the Hon’ble Court for the violation of Articles 14 & 15 of the Indian Constitution, by...

WHETHER PAST SERVICE AS A CIVIL JUDGE CAN BE USED FOR APPOINTMENT TO DELHI HIGH COURT JUDICIAL SERVICE?

-Report by Sakshi Tanwar The question in the present writ petition is whether the past service rendered by the petitioner as a Civil Judge can be counted for the purpose of calculating the...

THERE IS NO PREJUDICE TO THE RIGHTS AND CONTENTIONS OF ALL THE PARTIES, TO BE TAKEN AT AN APPROPRIATE PROCEEDING: DELHI HC

-Report by Mehul Jain It was held by the Delhi High Court in the case of Alliance of Digital India Foundation Vs Competition Commission of India & Ors that on April 24, It is made clear that the observations...

THE OFFICER COMPULSORILY RETIRED FROM SERVICE DUE TO PHYSICAL UNFITNESS

-Report by Nehha Mishra In the case of DILIP KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA, the court said that the “petitioner may be unfit to perform the duty for the post he was appointed but...

A CHALLENGE TO THE DECISION MADE UNDER CPC ORDER 37 RULE 4 IS NOT ADMISSIBLE UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1

-Report by Sejal Jethva ZAFAR BADYARI VS. SANDEEP SINGH, in this matter, the appellant/defendant seeks to challenge the decision made by the learned, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, according to Order 43 Rule 1 read...

Non-appearance in the court is self-evident that the party has failed to contend the case on the merits: Delhi HC granted ex parte decision

-Report by Srishti Delhi High Court in the case of LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER Vs SANTOSH & ORS. on April 18 passed an ex parte decision imposing a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from using the...

NO JUSTIFICATION FOR NOT ADJUDICATING NOTICES MORE THAN 15 YEARS AFTER ISSUANCE, THE SAME MUST BE DONE IN A REASONABLE TIME: DELHI HC

-Report by Arunima Jain The Delhi High Court on Thursday while referring to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, upheld that the question of whether the notice or demand for recovery was given within a reasonable length of time considering the case’s facts and circumstances should...

RESPONDENT OVERSTEPPED JURISDICTION IN OPINING THAT BANK CLERK OF 20 YEARS WAS NOT ENTITLE TO PENSION: DELHI HC

-Report by A.K. Sooraj The Delhi High Court in the case VIJAY KUMAR JHAMB vs. UNION OF INDIA held that the respondent overstepped its jurisdiction in opining that the bank...

DISPARAGING ADVERTISEMENT OR TRUTHFUL DEPICTION? DELHI HC RESTRAINS HUL FROM AIRING TV COMMERCIAL

-Report by Yashica Dhawan Case name: HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED versus RECKITT BENCKISER(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED In this case, the appellant (hereafter ‘HUL’) has filed the present appeal impugning a judgement dated 09.11.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the appellant abstained from publishing a print advertisement and airing three YouTube videos....

FAILURE IN PROVING THE ‘UNTOWARD INCIDENT’: COMPENSATION DENIED BY DELHI HC

-Report by Nehha Mishra In the case of KALPANA DEVI VS UNION OF INDIA, the appellant failed to prove the situation as an ‘untoward incident’ defined under Section 123(c) of...