List of Interns Selected for the Month Of July 2021

(Through Alliance University Placement Cell)                                     Open this page in desktop view

LIST OF APPLICANTS SELECTED FOR LEGAL RESEARCH INTERNSHIP

Name

Roll

Program

LIST OF APPLICANTS SELECTED FOR NEWS STORIES INTERNSHIP

Name

Roll

Program

About us                                             

Lexpeeps Pvt. ltd. is an organization that works to assist and help law schools in organizing and managing their events. We’re seeking to provide young and dynamic law students a platform to experience the legal world in their academic capacities. We organize different events where budding lawyers can experience the legal world. With a self-directed educational strategy and the guidance of industry experts, Lexpeeps also provide you with the recent happening in the legal world in the form of news, opportunities where you can find what suits you the best, articles to explore your interests, and many more.

Keeping practical exposure for the law students in mind:

Lexpeeps provides you with internships, where the legal experts and budding lawyers come in touch with each other and grow by associating with the company.

“Lexpeeps Pvt. Ltd. thrives on commitment and creativity”

About the Internship

Lexpeeps Student Buddy Internship Program is a customised Internship to make student Earn, Learn and Network at a Single place in a fixed date.

Interns Work Role

  • Communicating with potential students from the comfort of your home
  • Pitching about services by different mean
  • Organizing sessions for mutual Growth
  • Answering FAQs

Requirements

  • E-mail Id
  • Source of Online Transaction (Required after selection)
  • People from any age group can apply for this Program

Tenure

100 Days

Perk

  • Chance to Win Exciting Gift to the Best Intern
  • Earn Money Daily
  • Prestigious Letter of Recommendation to 10 Best Performers
  • E-Certificates to all after Success Compilation of Internship

Location

Work from Home

How to Register?

Fill this form

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1tsZwEMmw33DfbTs7Y8ZxtFQzByu_K1y_idy95j_8vrE/edit

Deadline to Register

28th June 2021

Contact us:

Mail : querieslexpeeps@gmail.com

Visit us for more such opportunities: http://lexpeeps.in/

This article is written by Sanjana Suman, a student of Amity Law School, Amity University Jharkhand Ranchi

INTRODCUTION

Initially, the Indian Penal Code dealt with bribery and corruption in situations involving public servants inside the Indian Justice System. However, it was recognised in the 1945s that the current law was insufficient to fulfill the needs, and a need was felt to adopt special laws to combat bribery and corruption. As a result, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 was adopted for the first time.

Based on the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee, the 1947 Act was changed twice: once by the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1952, and again by the Anti-Corruption Laws (Amendment) Act of 1964. The 1947 Act served as a model for the 1988 Prevention of Corruption Act, which comes into force on September 9, 1988. Its goal was to make anti-corruption legislation more effective by broadening their scope and reinforcing the provisions in order to improve the overall statute.

If we cannot make India corruption-free, then the vision of making the nation develop by 2020 would remain as a dream.” – Dr. A.P.J.Abdul Kalam

Corruption

The word “corruption” derives from the Latin term “corrupts,” which means “corrupted.” Corruption is defined as dishonest or deceptive behaviour by those in positions of power, such as government officials or other administrators. Giving or receiving inappropriate gifts and bribes, under-the-table payments, money laundering, and black money, meddling with elections, and defrauding investors are all examples of corruption. India is regarded as one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Following the 2G spectrum lawsuit and the Commonwealth Games Scam in 2010, Parliament resolved to change the Act. The desire for illicit profits, greed for money, and the prevention of furthering any wrongdoing are the main reasons why people engage in corruption so regularly. It has been noticed that unlawful gains, often known as black money, are deposited in Swiss banks or the World Bank in order to make additional black money.

Salient features of the Prevention of Corruption Act 

  • It incorporates the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947, the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1952, and Sections 161 to 165-A of the Indian Penal Code, with minor changes. 
  • It has broadened the scope of definitions such as “public duty” and “public servant” under Section 2 of the act’s defining clause.
  • It has moved the burden of proof from the prosecution to the accused who is charged with the offence, as stated in the CrPC. 
  • The terms of the Act stipulate unequivocally that the investigation must be conducted by an officer with a rank no lower than that of Deputy Superintendent of Police.
  • The 1988 Act broadened the definition of “public servant” to include employees of the central government, union territories, nationalised banks, University Grants Commission personnel, vice-chancellors, professors, and others. 
  • The Act criminalises ‘corrupt’ activities like as bribery, misappropriation, acquiring a monetary advantage, possessing assets disproportionate to income, and so on.

Crimes Punishable by The Prevention of Corruption Act

When a public servant receives money or gifts in exchange for a favour from someone other than their employer, they are not earning their wage.

Any person who assists the public servant in committing the crime.

When a person distributes or receives presents in order to influence a public servant through his personal connections, illegal techniques, or corrupt means, that person’s influence will be made public.

When a government employee is in charge of conducting criminal misbehaviour.

When a public servant accepts bribes or commits corruption with someone with whom he or she has a business or official relationship.

Critical analysis of the Act

The Act’s goal, as amended later, appears to establish a high level of accountability on commercial entities. The Act is based on the contemporary trend of anti-bribery and anti-corruption notions since it provides us with a tool of action expressly for cases of corruption in Public Duties. The provisions of this Act are subject to multiple interpretations, which can only be resolved through more decisions and newer revisions in this area. There are a few highlights of this legislation that have arisen as a result of the recent revisions, which are as follows:

A trial must be completed within four years of the first hearing, according to Section 4 of the Act, although there is no indication of what the deviance might entail. The entire process would be slowed and stalled as a result of this.

Despite the lack of clarity in Section 9 of the Act, it appears to imply that Indian corporations must begin adding anti-bribery provisions into their commercial agreements. 

Sections 7A and 8 of the Act, which primarily deal with excessive benefits in organisations, state that anyone who is involved in corruption, whether a private or public entity, can be penalised.

When an Indian party enters into a contract with another party that engages in corrupt practises with or without the former party’s knowledge, the corporation engaging in corrupt actions may be penalised.

Simply reading the provisions of this Act, it is evident that it is aimed at risk mitigation by implementing rigorous anti-bribery and anti-corruption procedures or rules that are appropriate for our nation in order to eliminate the cancer of corruption from our society.

Landmark Cases under the Act

The question in CBI, Bank Securities & Fraud Cell v. Ramesh Gelli and Others (Writ Petition (CRL.) NO. 167 OF 2015) was what bodies are considered public servants. The Supreme Court of India has ruled that officers of private banks are public officials under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) of 1988. The court further stated that the Act’s goals were to make anti-corruption legislation more effective while also broadening its scope. 

The legality of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was called into doubt in Manzoor Ali v. Union of India (WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 305 OF 2007). The court found that a sanction for prosecution in a corruption case is not unconstitutional since the mere possibility of abuse cannot be used to declare a provision unconstitutional.

In Aiyappa v. Anil Kumar ((2013) 10 SCC 705), the court stated that the purpose of the Act’s provisions is to safeguard an innocent public servant against unjustified and mala fide prosecution.

The 2G Spectrum Case was one of the Act’s major instances, in which telecom spectrum was allocated at a bargain price by the UPA government through fraudulent and illegal ways. The acts were in breach of the Act’s requirements on public duty, and charges were filed against the individuals involved. A special CBI court was convened for the trial, and all of the defendants were acquitted on December 21, 2017.

CONCLUSION 

Corruption is a cancer that is eating away at the core of our society, stifling not only individual growth but also the collective development of our country. 

The Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988 is essential anti-corruption legislation. However, legislation alone will not win the war against corruption; it is the conduct of our legislators that will give us an advantage in combating this scourge. It is also vital to remember that nothing in this universe is perfect, and the same holds true for this Act. It is facing complaints from legal luminaries as a result of the new revisions, but this should be avoided, and legislators should seek to uncover the gaps in the laws and make it as faultless as possible.

Latest Posts


Archives

This article is written by Mudit Jain , pursuing B.B.A.LL.B.(H) from the Indore Institute of Law. This article describes the Organised Crimes in India, in what type they are being conducted and what are the flaws in the control method.

INTRODUCTION 

The sale of unlawful products and services to a large number of citizen clients is the mainstay of organised crime. It is also heavily involved in legal commerce and labour unions. It uses unlawful techniques including as monopolisation, terrorism, extortion, and tax evasion to drive out or control legitimate ownership and leadership, as well as to take illicit profits from the public. Organized crime also corrupts public authorities in order to avoid government intervention and is growing more sophisticated. In India, in addition to the conventional realms of activity like extortion, soliciting protection money, contract killing, bootlegging, gambling, prostitution, and smuggling, drug trafficking, illicit arms dealing, money laundering, and transportation are now involved. Organized crime seeks to obtain power by influencing public authorities and therefore monopolising or near monopolising. Later, the money and power that it generates are utilised to infiltrate the legitimate company and a variety of other linked operations.

Meaning of Organised Crimes

Organised crime is described as “those involved in continuing major criminal actions for large profit elsewhere, usually in collaboration with others.” An organised crime gang is a gang of criminals who work together for the length of a certain criminal activity or activities. Structures of organised criminal groups differ. A stable core of essential persons is commonly seen in successful organised criminal groups. There is a swarm of subordinates, experts, and other temporary individuals surrounding them, as well as an extensive network of disposable allies.

Many organisations are, in reality, informal networks of criminals that band together for the length of a criminal operation, playing various roles based on their abilities and competence. Shared experiences (such as incarceration) or recommendations from reliable persons strengthen collaboration. Others are bound by family or cultural connections — some are even referred to as “criminal families.”

Organized crime employs professionals who provide a service, sometimes to a variety of crime organisations. Transportation, money laundering, debt collection, or the provision of fraudulent papers are examples of services (identity crime supports a wide range of organised crime).

Characteristics of Organised Crimes

Continuity: The criminal organisation exists beyond the lives of individual members and is designed to withstand changes in leadership.

Structure: The criminal organisation is organised as a set of hierarchically ordered interconnected offices each dedicated to the accomplishment of a certain function. It might be very organised or quite flexible. It is distinctive, though, because the rankings are based on power and authority.

Membership in the core criminal group is restricted and based on shared characteristics such as ethnicity, criminal record, or mutual hobbies. Potential members are subjected to extensive inspection and must demonstrate their worth and commitment to the criminal organisation. Membership standards include secrecy, a readiness to perform any act for the organisation, and a desire to safeguard the group. In exchange for allegiance, a member of a criminal organisation receives financial incentives, a certain status, and protection from police authorities.

Criminality: To obtain revenue, the criminal gang relies on ongoing criminal activities. As a result, ongoing criminal conspiracy is inherent in organised crime. Some unlawful activities include the provision of unlawful products and services.

Violence: Violence and the threat of violence are essential components of a criminal organisation. The threat of violence is employed against members of the group to keep them in line, as well as against outsiders to preserve the organization’s economic interests. Members are expected to engage in, condone, or allow violent behaviour.

Power/Profit Goal: The criminal group’s members seek to maximise the group’s profits. Political power is obtained by the corruption of public authorities, such as lawmakers and political executives. The criminal organisation retains power by its affiliation with the “protectors,” who defend the organisation and its earnings.

Legal Position in India on Organized Crimes

In some form or another, organised crime has always existed in India. It has, however, taken on a more virulent form in contemporary times as a result of a variety of socioeconomic and political causes, as well as improvements in science and technology. Although rural India is not immune, it is mostly an urban problem.

Criminal Conspiracy is defined in Section 120-A of the Indian Penal Code as “when two or more persons agree to do or cause to be done-

 (1) an illegal act, 

(2) An act that is not made criminal by using illegal methods. Such an agreement is referred to be a criminal conspiracy.

Except, however, that no agreement, other than an agreement to commit an offence, shall constitute a criminal conspiracy unless one or more parties to such agreement perform some act other than the agreement in pursuance thereof. merely ancillary to that object.”

Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code makes criminal conspiracy a punishable offence.

Dacoity and Related Offences

Dacoity is one of India’s oldest types of crime, conducted solely for the goal of looting or extortion. Dacoity is defined in Section 391 of the Penal Code as:

“When five or more people concurrently commit or attempt to commit a robbery, or when the total number of people concurrently committing or attempting to commit a robbery, and persons present and aiding such commission or attempt amount to five or more, every person so committing, attempting, or aiding is said to commit ‘dacoity.’”

Dacoity is punished by life imprisonment or harsh imprisonment for up to ten years and five months (section 395).

a) criminals preparing to commit debauchery (section 399)

a) Congregation with the aim of committing dacoity (section 402).

c) Section 400 of the Code criminalises the act of belonging to a “gang” of people who are connected for the purpose of committing dacoities on a regular basis.

d) Abduction for ransom, the legislature added Section 364-A to the Indian Penal Code.”

Law on Gangsters

There is no centralised regulation to combat “gang activity” that is applicable across the country. The most populous and politically powerful state, Uttar Pradesh, adopted the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, which is solely applicable in that state. The gang has been defined as a group of people who, individually or collectively, engage in anti-national activities through violence or the threat of violence in order to gain undue political, economic, or physical advantages, and this includes offences against the body, boot-legging, forcible possession of the immovable property, causing communal disturbances, obstructing public servants in the discharge of their duties, and so on. A gangster faces a minimum sentence of two years in jail, which can be increased to ten years (sec. 3). The rules of evidence have been changed, and the trial court can now establish certain statutory presumptions against the criminals. There is an additional provision for the protection of witnesses. At the request of the public prosecutor, the trial may be held behind closed doors. If the Court so wants, the name and address of a witness may be omitted from the court records. The District Magistrate can seize the gangster’s property if he or she believes it was obtained via illegal conduct. This Act has a broad scope and professes to address a wide range of organised criminal conduct.

Other Laws

There are a number of additional major legislation that address certain aspects of organised crime. Some of them are as follows:

  1. The Customs Act, enacted in 1962; 
  2. The Narcotics, Drugs, and Explosives Act; and the Narcotics, Drugs, and Explosives Act.
  3. The Psychotropic Substances Act of 1884;
  4.  The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act of 1956;
  5. 1973 Foreign Exchange Regulation Act
  6. The Public Gambling Act of 1867, and so on.
  7. In addition, the State Government has enacted legislation on topics like as excise, prohibition, and gaming, among others.

Preventive Action

The National Security Act of 1980 authorises preventative detention by the Central Government, State Governments, or personnel designated by this Government. The detention order is given for a year in order to prevent a person from behaving in any way that may jeopardise India’s defence or good ties with foreign states. An Advisory Board led by a sitting High Court judge must authorise the detention. The phrase “security of India” is susceptible to interpretation, and this Act has been utilised, although rarely, against anti-national groups and hard-core gangsters. Detention is an executive measure, and the matter is not heard in court. The illicit trafficking of narcotic narcotics and psychotropic substances endangers people’s health and welfare, and the activities of those involved in such illegal traffic have a destabilising influence on the national economy. Detention is provided for under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1988. The Central Government, the State Government, or designated officers of these governments may issue an order detaining a person in order to prevent him from engaging in illicit drug trafficking. The confinement can be for one year, but it can be extended to two years under specific conditions. As a result, India has legislation strewn about in numerous statutes to deal with various aspects of organised crime. The present rules, however, fall well short of what is required to combat the threat. The Indian government is aware of this and has drafted the Organized Crime Control Act.

The proposed Act defines ‘Organised Criminal Gang’ in a fairly broad sense, including the majority of the important terms.

Typical characteristics of organised crime A gang is defined as “a group of two or more people who commit or attempt to commit or cause to be committed, either individually or collectively, in furtherance of a common object or objects on a continuing basis, for material gain or otherwise, by resorting to the use or display of violence or threat of violence, either direct or implied, or by fraudulent means.”

Murder, bodily injury, smuggling, drug trafficking, abduction for ransom, espionage, triggering bomb explosions, aeroplane hijacking, hostage-taking, mass-murdering, contract killing, gang rapes, extortion, and other significant crimes are included in Schedule I.

Profile of some Organised Criminal Cases

Since ancient times, criminal gangs have operated in India. Thugs’ groups frequently preyed on travellers or wayfarers when travelling lonely regions amid dense rainforests. Thugs travelled in bands, large or small, typically unarmed and disguised as pilgrims, ascetics, or other innocent wayfarers.

Dawood Gang

Dawood is the most powerful of the Bombay criminals, with national and international connections. He is one of the most powerful criminals involved in transnational crimes, namely drug trafficking, smuggling, extortion, and contract killing. He has been a resident of Dubai since 1985. He experienced a meteoric climb in a short period of time. As the son of a Bombay Crime Branch Head Constable, he began as a small criminal and had Bombay Police sympathies owing to his father’s connections.

The Arun Gawli Gang

His group is involved in contract killings and the collecting of protection money from wealthy businesspeople.

Types of Organised Crimes

1. Ransom Kidnapping

Kidnapping for ransom is a well-organized crime in metropolitan areas. There are various local and inter-state gangs active since the financial advantages outweigh the labour and risk required.

2. Contract Homicides

Murder is a capital offence punished by life in jail or death under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. In murder trials, the conviction rate is around 38%. Contract killings have a very low risk of being discovered. Contract killings are carried out by employing a professional gang for a monetary reward.

3. Drug Addiction and Trafficking

It is the country’s most significant organised crime, and it is genuinely multinational in nature. India is strategically located between the nations of the Golden Triangle and the Golden Crescent, and it serves as a transit hub for narcotic substances manufactured in these regions to the West. India also produces a significant amount of licit opium, a portion of which makes its way into the illegal market in various ways. In India, the illicit drug trade revolves around five principal substances: heroin, hashish, opium, cannabis, and methaqualone. Cocaine, amphetamine, and LSD seizures are not uncommon, though they are minor and infrequent.

4. Smuggling

Another important economic infraction is smuggling, which consists of clandestine operations leading to unrecorded transactions. The level of smuggling is determined by the type of the government’s budgetary policy. The kind and quantity of smuggled commodities are also affected by the fiscal policies in place. India has a 7,500-kilometre-long coastline and porous borders with Nepal and Bhutan, making it vulnerable to large-scale smuggling of contraband and other consumable commodities. Though it is impossible to estimate the number of contraband products transported into this nation, the value of contraband confiscated can provide some insight into the scale of smuggling, even if it represents a very small per cent of total smuggling.

5. Hawala & Money Laundering

Money laundering is the process of converting unlawful and ill-gotten money into supposedly legal money in order for it to be absorbed into the legitimate economy. The proceeds of drug-related crimes are a major source of money laundering all around the world. Furthermore, tax evasion and violation of exchange restrictions play a significant part in blending this ill-gotten money with tax evaded income to conceal its origin. This is often accomplished through the laborious stages of placement, layering, and integration, so that the money so integrated into the legitimate economy may be freely utilised by criminals without fear of detection. Money laundering is a severe danger to countries’ criminal justice systems as well as their sovereignty across the world.

Control Efforts have Issues

1. Inadequate Legal Framework

Combating organised crime has a number of challenges. To begin with, India lacks a dedicated law to control/suppress organised crime. As an ongoing conspiracy, instances of organised crime are prosecuted under general conspiracy law and appropriate particular statutes. The current law is insufficient since it focuses on individuals rather than criminal groups or criminal organisations. Conspiracies develop in the shadows, and proving them in court is a tremendous undertaking.

2. Difficulties in Obtaining Evidence

Because organised criminal gangs are hierarchical in nature, the upper tiers of leadership are shielded from police enforcement. It may be feasible to convict the actual perpetrators of crime, but it is difficult to go beyond them in the hierarchy due to evidentiary regulations, notably the inadmissibility of confessions made by offenders before they are convicted. Witnesses are unwilling to testify because they fear for their life, and there is no law to protect witnesses from organised gangs. The informers are reluctant to come forward since there is a stigma linked to being an ‘informer.’

3. A scarcity of Resources and Training

The police are the subject of the State in our constitutional framework. The investigation of cases, their prosecution, and the establishment of criminal tribunals is the duty of each state government. Most states are facing a budget constraint and are unable to provide appropriate funding to criminal justice system agencies. The number of police officers stationed in police stations is insufficient. Furthermore, there are few training facilities for investigating organised crime.

4. Criminality on both counts

National borders are not respected by criminal syndicates. Certain crimes, notably drug trafficking, are planned in one location and carried out in another. Criminals also migrate quickly from one section of the world to the next. Various countries have different legal systems. In one nation, an act may be considered a criminal, but not in another. Money laundering, for example, is a felony in the United States and some European nations but not in India.

5. Coordination Deficit

There is no national-level entity in India that coordinates the operations of state/city police organisations as well as central enforcement authorities in combatting organised crime. Furthermore, no agency exists to gather, consolidate, analyse, document, and serve as a clearinghouse for information pertaining to transnational and inter-state gangs operating in India and overseas. Similarly, at the national and state levels, there is no structure of systematic pursuit of selected gangs. Aside from a lack of institutional framework, there are coordination issues between the Central Government and the State Governments, as well as between one State Government and another State Government, due to variations in political attitudes.

Latest Posts


Archives

This article is written by Prateek Chandgothia. This article discusses the state of fundamental rights of the child to education in the islands of Andaman and Nicobar with emphasis on access and infrastructure.

Right to Education Act, 2009

The Right to Education Act was enacted on 4th August 2009 and came into effect on 1st April 2010. Through this legislation, the right to education was included within the ambit of Article 21(A) of the Indian Constitution as a fundamental right. It encompasses free and compulsory education for children between the age of 6-14 years. The Act also lays down the benchmarks and standards of education including the student-teacher ratio which must be adhered to by all the educational institutions. It also provides for age-appropriate learning for children, who are included late, under the provision of right to education. It lays down an anti-discriminatory policy while dispensing education to underprivileged children. The act also establishes the standardized academic curriculum. The right to education extends to all the Indian territories including the Islands of Andaman and Nicobar.

Status of Education in Andaman and Nicobar Islands

The 2011 census of India determined the literacy rate of the population of Andaman and Nicobar Islands at 86.63% which has remained constant over the years. The rate is also higher than the national average of 77.7% which indicates a positive picture of the education system of the islands. The consistency in this rate through the years also indicates a positive trend in education. Various schemes have been introduced to adhere to the compulsory education of children. As a part of this initiative, at least one primary school is established within 1 km of every habitation which has a population of 150 or more. 

Early childhood care and education (ECCE) provides for pre-primary education of children which includes educational, physical, psychological, and nutritional needs of the children. According to the NFHS-5 Phase 1 report, the data collected from 17 States and five Union territories, Sikkim and Andaman and Nicobar Islands had the highest enrolment percentage in pre-primary school in the five-year age group during the school year 2019-20 at 41.2 percent and 42.6 percent respectively. Andaman and Nicobar Islands also topped the list with the highest number of rural enrolments in the pre-primary schools. Pre-primary education provides an early platform to encourage physical, mental, and psychological growth by fostering creativity at a very young age. 

Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan (SSA) is an important flagship program of the Indian government to ensure the implementation of free and compulsory education till the elementary stage. This program was also extended to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. This program was introduced in 2001-02 to enroll all children aged between 6-14 into schools, Education Guarantee Scheme or Alternative and Innovative Education till 2010, and continues to ensure this.

Challenges to the Education Sector

The 2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake triggered one of the deadliest tsunamis in the history of Andaman and Nicobar Islands leaving over 1500 dead and 5000 missing. It also greatly affected the infrastructure of the islands which directly affected the education standards of children. Moreover, till less than a decade ago, the policy implementation of the Indian Government can be described as colonial in nature and fulfilling the condition of Res Nullis. This was mainly due to the large part of the population being Negroid descendants. Various policies have been implemented over the years to inhabit the island by bringing in settlers from the Indian mainland. This course of action further indicates positively towards the motives of the Indian Government while implementing various policies. These factors have directly or indirectly affected the standard and access to education in the Islands. 

Another major hurdle is the bearing of the expense of education as most of the daily laborers inhabiting the islands have an average daily income of slightly over Rs. 200/- only. It is evident to note that, after the introduction of the right to education, although schooling was made free, the ancillary expenses were often not accounted for which included uniforms, stationaries, and other academic-related commodities. Children inhabiting the Southern parts of the islands are deprived of basic public transport and need to walk long distances to reach schools. This is also due to the scattered nature of inhabitants in the southern part of the islands. 

Despite the low levels of family income, a significant number of children do manage to receive basic education. However, many families avoid sending their children to receive education mainly due to the lack of industries that provide employment to skilled labour. The end result of the education is not made evidently significant and therefore, many families perceive education to be a mere waste of money. The employment at offer in the islands is mainly of blue-collar nature whereas the education being imparted trains the students for white-collar life. This clash has rendered the skills and talent of the children irredeemable. This coupled with economical constraints has provided the families living there with only enough to perceive that education is not necessary. Various procedural aspects also infest the education sector in the Islands with the significant loss of time being incurred by the students between the appointment of the teaching delegation and the actual arrival of the same. During this time period, students are often expected to self-study with the help of the textbooks prescribed to them. 

The earthquakes and tsunamis which ravaged the Andaman and Nicobar Islands in 2004 lead to a significant loss of the region which was submerged under the water. It caused a significant economic loss towards damage alleviation along with harming the established infrastructure of education. Due to the significant loss of region, establishing new infrastructure required clearing of forest lands raising grave environmental concerns. The clearing of forests was also a major threat to the tourism sector of the islands. Since most of the settlements are in the form of coastal strips, significant parts of the inhabited areas are now tidal flats. This has left many buildings and structures within the reaches of the waves and these include school buildings.

Conclusion

Access to education has seen substantial development in the past few years post the legislation of the Right to Education under Article 21(A) of the Indian Constitution. The consistency in literacy rates and urban and rural enrolments in primary education indicates a positive trend in the implementation of the Right to Education. However, various challenges like low family income levels, ancillary academic expenses, unavailability of white-collar jobs, and sub-standard infrastructure are still infesting the education sector of the islands.  

Latest Posts


Archives

This case analysis is written by Vanshika Arora, a first-year B.A.LLB student at Army Institute of Law, Mohali.

Case Number

233 of 1962

Equivalent Citation

AIR 1966 AP 163, (1965) 2 An WR 518 

Bench

Hon’ble Justice Chandrasekhara Sastry, Hon’ble Justice Venkatesam JJ

Date of Judgement

April 16, 1965

Relevant Acts

Indian Contract Act, 1872, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 

Relevant Sections

Section 149 and 148 of Indian Contract Act, 1872; Section 34 of Sale of Goods Act, 1930

Facts of the case

Appalaswamhy Naidu (defendant 1) along with defendant 2, borrowed a sum of Rs. 10,000 from the Bank of Chittor In 1949 for a family necessity. The loan was taken by the means of a promissory note, due with an interest of 9% per annum and collateral. The collateral given were cinema accessories and a projector belonging to Naidu and defendant 3. In respect of this borrowed amount, Naidu, defendant 1, and defendant 2 borrowed another loan of Rs 17,640 in 1956, payable at a quarterly interest of 9%. The same collateral security was offered by the defendants. The pledged Cinema projector and accessories were sold by the defendants to defendant 4. This was possible since the pledged machinery was kept by the bank with the defendants since it formed part of the running cinema. Defendant 4, bought the machinery in spite of his knowledge that they were pledged as bank security. Thereafter, the bank issued notices to defendants 1, 2, and 4,  demanding payment. Only defendant 4 replied to the notice, falsely stating that he was a bona fide purchaser and was not aware of the bank security. The suit was therefore filed by the bank in order to sell the pledged goods, in the custody of defendant 4, and recover a payable amount of Rs. 21,555. Subsequently, an appeal was filed in the High Court, by defendant 4. 

Issues

Is there a valid pledge of goods by the defendants since the goods were never in possession of the bank? 

Ratio Decidendi

Defendant 4 contended that the bank had no valid pledge of the goods since it was never in possession of the goods. The court observed that in a letter dated 19.09.1949, defendant one sent a typed letter to the bank stating that “I request you to leave the Cinema projector and allied machinery pledged to the loan dated 19-9-1949 in my possession to run the shows. I will hold the same to the Bank in trust and will be prepared to give possession of the entire machinery to the Bank whenever so demanded. During the possession of the machinery, I will keep all the articles and the projector safe and I would be responsible for any loss or damage to the same.” From the contents of the letter, the court observed that this letter acknowledged the possession of the bank, since it renders the defendants as trustees of the bank, in possession of pledged goods, Moreover, under Section 149 of the India Contract Act and Section 34 of the Sale of Goods Act, the bank as a bailee, need not necessarily have physical possession of goods. In this case, the bailor (defendant), made constructive delivery of goods to the bailee. 

Decision

The court rejected the contention of defendant 4 and held that the bank was in true possession of the goods as a bailee.

Latest Posts


Archives

This article is written by Priyanka Choudhary, currently pursuing BALLB from Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Rajasthan. This article deals with the comparison of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 of India in contrast with the USA, UK, and Canada Juvenile Justice System.

INTRODUCTION

To replace the Juvenile Delinquency Law and therefore the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act) of 2000, The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was introduced and passed in Parliament in 2015. One of the main provisions of the new Act was that it treated the juveniles of the age group of 16-18 years as adults who were in conflict with the law and allowed their trials, in cases where the crimes were to be determined. It is determined by a Juvenile Justice Board, that what should be the nature of the crime and whether the juvenile should be tried as a minor or a child. This provision received a push after the 2012 Nirbhaya gangrape case in which one of the accused was just short of 18 years, and was therefore tried as a juvenile.

How does Juvenile Justice Work in India

“The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015”, defines the process or the legal framework in which juveniles between the age of 16 to 18 years in India, can appear before a judge.

USA Juvenile Justice System  

The American Juvenile Justice System is the primary method to handle minors who are below 18 years and have committed criminal offenses or crimes. The federal “Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act” (JJDPA) which was established in 1974 and last reauthorized in 2002, provides crucial support to the state programs that assist communities to take a comprehensive approach to prevent the crimes or offenses done by juveniles and to quickly and effectively address the needs of vulnerable youth and their families. 

UK Juvenile Justice System

“The Youth Justice System in England and Wales” provides for the processes that are used to prosecute, convict and punish the ones who are below the age of 18 years and who have committed criminal crimes or offenses. The main aim of the Youth Justice System is to prevent the children and young people from committing the crime. 

Canada Juvenile Justice System

“The Youth Criminal Justice Act” (YCJA) of Canada provides for the rights of young people from the age of 12 to 17 years and who are being charged with a crime or offense. A child under 12 years of age cannot be charged with a crime and a person of 18 years of age is considered an adult in the court. 

Comparative Analysis with the Laws of USA, UK and Canada

  • The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, governs the Indian Juvenile System.
  • The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA), 1974, governs the American Juvenile Justice System.
  • The Youth Justice System in England and Wales, governs the UK Juvenile Justice System.
  • The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), governs the Canadian Juvenile Justice System.

Criminal Responsibility

  1. India: In India, the law defines a juvenile as a person who is under the age of 16, according to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
  2. United States of America: In USA, some of the state statutes allow for juveniles as young as age 7 years old to be held responsible for some law violations.
  3. United Kingdom: In UK, the ones who are below the age of 18 years and have committed criminal crimes or offenses, can be prosecuted, convicted, and punished.
  4. Canada: A child under 12 years of age cannot be charged with a crime and a person of 18 years of age is considered an adult in the court. So between the age of 12 to 17 a juvenile can be charged with a crime or offense.

Judicial Process

  1. India: Under this Act, children are not to be taken to a regular criminal court. The main aim of a separate court is socio-legal rehabilitation and reformation, not punishment. The aim is to hold a child culpable for their criminal activity, not through punishment, but by counseling the child to understand their actions and persuade them away from criminal activities in the future. The Juvenile Justice Act consists of a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the first class and two social workers, at least one of whom must be a woman. Juvenile Justice Act is meant to resolve cases within four months.
  2. USA: Youth courts are programs in which youth punish their peers for petty offender and status crimes and other problem behaviors. The primary function of most youth court programs is to determine a fair and restorative sentence or disposition for the youth respondent.
  3. UK: When a young person commits a grave crime or offense, they can be sent to the youth court. Other than murder and manslaughter, youth courts deal with all serious crimes committed by young persons. The process depends on the age of the child or young person: Most young people in the Youth Court are between the age of 14-17 years old, however, 12 and 13-year-olds are included if they are charged with particularly serious offenses. But after the 1st of July of 2019, the Youth Court started including 17-year-olds who have been charged with an offense. If the charge is particularly serious then the young person would have to appear firstly in the youth court and then the case will be transferred to the District Court.
  4. Canada: Special considerations are taken when young people commit criminal acts. The YCJA applies to children between the age of 12 to 17 years, who get into trouble with the law. The YCJA says that young individuals should be held accountable for their criminal acts, although not in the same way or to the same extent as adults. It is in society’s interest to ensure that as many young offenders as possible should be rehabilitated and become productive members of society in the future. However, in most cases, judges impose one of the youth sentencing options in the YCJA. Moreover, in very serious cases, the court does have the power to impose an adult sentence. However, if an adult sentence is imposed on the young person, then the Criminal Code penalties applied to the adult offenders will be applied to them. This can include mandatory minimum penalties and sentences up to life imprisonment. However, a young person cannot serve any part of a sentence in an adult prison before the age of 18.

CONCLUSION

The JJ Act of 2015 is modern and progressive legislation that intends to bring change and restore the juveniles, this legislation brings forth a whole set of guidelines that are also open to abuse. While undertaking the work of comparison between all the four legislations of the countries many different things were found out. 

Latest Posts


Archive

This article is written by SANJANA SUMAN, a student of Amity Law School, Amity University Jharkhand Ranchi.

INTRODUCTION

India one of the biggest stock exchanges in the world its own Bombay stock exchange. One of the biggest and most complex stock exchanges in the entire world but before 1992 the main problem with the Indian stock market is a dematerialization demutualization of documents. Harshad Mehta one of the middle-class boys who become a millionaire in just some year. But, though, he is a good man, there is always a coin that has two sides, and he followed a negative approach. He enjoys a loophole in the system of India.

The scam was the biggest money market scam ever perpetrated in India, with an estimated value of Rs. 4000 crore. Harshad Mehta, a stock and money market broker, was the principal perpetrator of the fraud. It was a systematic stock fraud involving bank receipts and stamp paper that caused the Indian stock market to crash after he saved India from bankruptcy. The scam exposed the underlying flaws in Indian financial institutions, leading to a completely overhauled stock-trading system that included the use of online security technologies.

The idea of diverting cash from the banking system to various stockholders or brokers is referred to as security fraud. Mehta conducted a systematic fraud in the Indian stock market in 1992, causing the entire securities system to collapse. He defrauded the banking system of almost $1 billion to acquire equities on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The entire exchange system suffered as a result of this, as the security system crumbled and investors lost thousands of rupees in the exchange system. The scale of the fraud was so vast that the stock market’s net value exceeded India’s health and education budgets.  Mehta secured securities from the State Bank of India against fraudulent cheques signed by corrupt officials and failed to deliver the securities, according to the scheme. Mehta used fake methods to inflate stock values and then sold the equities he owned in these companies. The fraud had a wide range of ramifications, including the loss of money for thousands of families and an instantaneous stock market drop. The index dropped from 4500 to 2500, resulting in a market capitalization loss of Rs.1000 billion.  The 1992 fraud generated a slew of suspicions about bank employees who may have colluded with Mehta. Many high bank officials were implicated, according to Montek Singh Ahluwalia (Secretary, Economic Affairs at the Ministry of Finance).

Stamp Paper Scam

Banks in India were not permitted to invest in the equity markets until the early 1990s. They were, however, expected to make a profit and keep a specific percentage of their assets in government fixed-income bonds (a “threshold”). To meet the banks’ capital requirements, Mehta drained capital from the banking system and invested it in the stock market. He promised the banks higher interest rates in exchange for transferring the funds to his personal account, ostensibly to acquire securities for them from other banks. To buy securities and forward bonds from other banks, a bank had to go through a broker at the time.  Mehta utilized the money in his account to buy stocks, substantially increase demand for particular stocks (such as ACC, Sterlite Industries, and Videocon), sell them, provide a portion of the proceeds to the bank, and pocket the rest for himself. As a result, companies like ACC, which was trading for ₹200 a share in 1991, skyrocketed to nearly ₹9,000 in just three months. 

Bank Receipt Scam

The bank receipt was another important tool (BR). Securities were not actually exchanged back and forth in a straight forward deal. Instead, the borrower, or seller of securities, issued a BR to the buyer of securities. The BR acts as a receipt from the selling bank, as well as a guarantee that the buyer will receive the securities for which they paid at the conclusion of the period. Mehta wanted banks that could issue false BRs, or BRs that were not backed by any government securities after he figured this out.

After the bogus BRs were issued, they were forwarded on to other banks, which then loaned money to Mehta, ostensibly because they thought they were lending against government securities when they weren’t.  He increased the cost of ACC from ₹200 to ₹9,000. That was a 4,400 percent rise. Because he had to book profits in the end, the markets fell on the day he sold. 

Ready Forward Deal Scam

The ready forward trade is a method of liaising between two banks through a single broker. A bank seeks a broker when it wants to sell securities. This broker attempts to sell assets at another bank, and vice versa for purchases. Because Mehta was a well-known broker, he had checks written in his name rather than the banks. When the bank demanded payment for the securities, he went to another bank and repeated the process, this time investing the bank’s funds in the stock market. Mehta took the ready-forward deal and applied it to the Indian banking system’s Bank Receipts mechanism. After the 1992 swindle, the Janakiraman Committee overhauled the whole Bank Receipts system, which was the most defective system. 

To obtain unsecured loans, Mehta used fake BRs and exploited multiple tiny banks to issue BRs on demand. Because they were small banks, Mehta could keep the receipts for as long as he wished. Cheques in favor of both banks were credited to the brokers’ accounts, one of which was Mehta’s. As a result, banks invested heavily into BOK and MCB, which both showed signs of expansion. Mehta used the BR fraud to raise the price of ACC from ₹200 to ₹900 in a short period of time. This 4400 percent surge was seen in several other equities, and the market fell when he sold them.

This continued on for as long as the stock prices rose, and no one knew what Mehta was up to. However, as the scam was revealed, several institutions were left with worthless BRs – the financial system had been defrauded of a huge 4,000 crore (equal to 250 billion or US$3.5 billion in 2019). He was well aware that if word got out about his involvement in sending checks to Mehta, he would be blamed. Following that, it was revealed that Citibank, brokers such as Pallav Sheth and Ajay Kayan, industrialists such as Aditya Birla and Hemendra Kothari, a number of politicians, and RBI Governor S.Venkitaramanan had all played a role in permitting or enabling Mehta’s share market manipulation. 

Realization of Scam and Market Crash

When it became clear that Mehta was a disproportionately significant investor in government assets, the swindle became obvious in late April 1992. Mehta was doing more than a third of India’s overall securities business at the time. When the public understood that Mehta’s investments were fraudulent and that his equities were likely worthless, Mehta’s equities were sold in a frenzy. Banks that had lent money to Mehta suddenly found themselves with hundreds of millions of dollars in unsecured debts. The combination of the selling frenzy and the fact that multiple banks had been cheated caused the Indian stock market to fall, with values plummeting by 40% almost instantly. Stocks finally fell 72 percent, resulting in a two-year bear market.

REFERENCES

https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/indias-biggest-scams.html?amp#aoh=16234170885051&amp_ct=1623417213473&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s

https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/markets/harshad-mehta-scam-10-key-points-of-the-scam-that-jolted-india-in-1992-5939931.html

https://www.cnbctv18.com/market/scam-1992-harshad-mehta-scam-explained-7417101.htm

Latest Posts


Archives

This article is written by Muskan Harlalka, a 2nd-year law student from the School of Law, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Rajasthan. The article aims to discuss the status of an individual under Public International Law.

International Law 

It is the law that provides rules and principles to govern the relations of States with each other, as well as the relations between individuals and States, and the relations between international organizations. The term ‘international law’ is also known as the Law of Nations. It was given by Jeremy Bentham, who was an English philosopher, in the year 1780. In International law, a country is referred to as ‘State’.   

International law is of two types – Private International Law and Public International Law. These two are as discussed below :- 

  1. Private International Law: Private International Law governs the relationship and dealings between individuals of different countries. These dealings may sometimes lead to controversies that affect the relationship between nations.
  2. Public International Law: Public International Law governs the issues arising as a result of the dealings between several nations or nations and the citizens or subjects of other nations.

In the last few years, the distinction between public and private international law has become uncertain. Issues of private international law may also come under the purview of public international law or have international significance.  

Individual” under International Law

When we speak of individuals with regard to their status in public international law, i.e. individuals entitled to rights and duties under international law, the term “individual” here has a broader scope. “Individual” in the legal sense means any subject of international law, thus it includes not only a human being, but also a commercial enterprise with a legal personality, and a foundation. This does not mean that all individuals have the same rights, it simply indicates that the term “individual” is taken in the broader sense.

Status of Individual 

  1. Before 1945 : Before 1945, the individual did not have any special status in the public international law. He could be regulated under international law, but he did not enjoy any rights and duties as an individual under the international legal order. This was because public international laws are laws governing states, and individuals are the citizens of those states, thus they were deemed to be objects instead of subjects. They were not considered to be competent to have rights and duties under international law. 

                     However, there were a series of treaties and customary rules concerning individuals, such as treaties protecting minorities, there were a series of rules in customary law known as the “minimum standard”. These rules provided for the way in which foreigners should be treated by the States. 

These regulations may have been for the benefit of the individual, but he could not claim them directly on the basis of customary rules or treaties due to the lack of direct rights or obligations under international law.

                     Earlier, States did not grant rights and duties directly applicable under international law which the individual could claim on his or her behalf from international organizations. It was provided that States would ratify the treaties and incorporate them into their domestic laws, and it was under the scope of this domestic law that the individual could claim the rights provided in those treaties. 

  1. After 1945 : The United Nations Organisation was established in the year 1945 after the end of the Second World War. It was during this time that the concept of International Law developed and became widespread. The experience of the war showed that cultural states could fall into relative barbarism and domestic laws could be deficient or dysfunction or be used for obscure purposes. Thus, the international community began considering the need and possibility of making an individual a subject under international law, thereby granting him legal responsibility and rights.

                    Thus the belief, that the international law is only concerned with interstate relations and an individual is merely an object of the State, has now changed since rights are granted and obligations are being imposed on individuals directly under the public international law. These rights are fundamental subjective rights that come under human rights, on the other hand, the obligations which are imposed on the individuals come under international criminal law, which is concerned with major crimes that can directly hold an individual accountable.

  1. International Treaties directly regulating individual rights : The rules of Public International Law have evolved to address individuals directly and now entail rights and obligations. The Charter of the United Nations of 1945 established the principle of respect for human rights, which was a relatively new concept in international law and international relations. The Charter led to the emergence of international human rights law and dozens of other international instruments that dealt with fundamental freedoms and various aspects of human rights. Some of those instruments are :
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966
  • International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1965
  • International Convention against Torture, 1989
  • International Convention on the Child Rights, 1989

These international instruments have led to the establishment of human rights generations which are as given below :

  • The first generation of civil and political rights
  • The second generation of economic, social and cultural rights
  • Third generation of solidarity rights

The developments in international legal relations led to the emergence of legal systems for the protection of human rights at the global and regional levels, thereby enhancing the status of the individual in public international law.

  1. International Treaties that directly impose obligations on the Individual : 

The establishment of the principle of international criminal responsibility has increased the obligations imposed on individuals by the rules of public international law.

An individual who commits serious crimes against the international community is prosecuted before the relevant international criminal tribunals regardless of his official status.

International crimes against which individuals are prosecuted are classified as :

  • War Crimes
  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Crimes of aggression

Some international treaties address individuals directly and impose obligations that must be met under international criminal responsibility. These treaties include :

  • International Convention for the suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948
  • The four Geneva Conventions of 1949
  • International Convention against War Crimes of 1968
  • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1988
  1. The Right to Submit Complaints and Claims at the international level : With unprecedented developments in international law, an individual can now file complaints and allegations directly with international judicial bodies and institutions to lift violations and obtain compensation for damages.

Conclusion

The status of individuals has significantly improved and they are now being recognised as participants and subjects of Public International Law. This has occurred mainly through the Humanitarian and Human rights laws coming together with the evolution of the Traditional International Law. Individuals are now granted certain rights and obligations directly under International Law.

Latest Posts


Archives

This article is written by Gracy Singh, a 2nd-year law student from Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Rajasthan. This article discusses about Child Abuse causes, its types and the policies, acts, and amendments to prevent it.

INTRODUCTION

‘The true character of a society is revealed in how it treats its children.’ – Nelson Mandela

 Violence against children is a harsh reality for millions of children from all socio-economic groups of the country. They face domestic abuse, trafficking, bullying, child labour, sexual violence, and these violence leave a long-lasting effect on their lives. The nation has provided its children with rights to ensure their safety, care, and development. Various reforms and acts had been made by the government to improve the condition of children and to uplift their standard of living. Regardless of the numerous legislative policies condition has not changed much over time. Child Abuse is one of the major problems in India. The root cause is mostly found in the areas with illiteracy and weaker sections of society.[1]

Meaning of Child Abuse

Child abuse refers to maltreatment of a child by a parent or guardian, including neglect, sexual molestation, or physical harm that leads to severe threats to the life and development of the child. It is not easy to find if a child is being abused. Children who are abused or maltreated do not inform anyone due to fear of getting blamed or that nobody will believe them. Child abuse can happen at home, schools, foster care institutions, playgrounds, and through social networking sites as well. This leaves a huge negative impact on children and it hampers their development.

Causes of Child Abuse

There can be many causes of child abuse; some of the causes are isolation and lack of family support, parenting skills, the pressure of caring for a child, financial stress,  mental illness or disability, addiction to drugs, alcohol, and gambling can also affect the ability to fulfil child’s need. Parents who experienced maltreatment in childhood also tend to abuse their children.[2]

Kinds of Child Abuse

Few types of Child Abuse are[3]:

  1. Physical Abuse – Hurting child’s body, hitting hard with hands, belt, an object that leaves bruises, cuts, or any other injury causing pain. Example – Shaking, pushing, punching, and kicking.
  2. Emotional Abuse – When a child is being threatened, bullied, not allowed to express his views, preventing from taking part in normal social interaction, telling them they are worthless or withholding affection. This can cause serious damage to a child’s emotional development.
  3. Physical Neglect – When a child is not provided necessary basic needs of food, shelter or clothing, etc. 
  4. Emotional and Psychological Neglect – Continuous lack of positive attention, love, warmth, and security.
  5. Sexual Abuse – Acts where a child is used by an adult for a sexual purpose. It can be sexual contacts such as sexual acts or non-contact sexual activities such as taking or sharing sexual photos and talks.  In most cases, the abuser is a known or trusted person.

Signs of Child Abuse

  • Fearful behaviour
  • Inexplicable/ undefined bruises, cuts, abdominal pain, bed-wetting
  • Antisocial behaviour
  • Inappropriate age behaviour
  • Extremely passive or aggressive behaviour
  • Big appetite and stealing food
  • Attempts to run
  • Genital pain, bleeding or discharge

Effects of Child Abuse

Child Abuse may have long-term consequences. Children may develop a wide range of reactions especially when a child is abused for a longer period. They suffer more psychologically than physically. A child who is abused or maltreated can become depressed and develop suicidal thoughts, or show withdrawn violent behavior. They overlook the tools needed to control stress, learning new skills to become resilient, strong, and successful. As they get older, they get addicted to drugs or alcohol and may develop marital or sexual difficulties. [4]

Relevant Constitutional Provisions

The Constitution of India imposes the responsibility on the state to promote the welfare of children and to ensure their dignity and sustainability.

  1. Article 14: It ensures every citizen is treated equally before the law.
  2. Article 15: Prohibits the discrimination on the grounds of gender, place of birth, religion, caste. Article 15 (3) give power to the state to make special provisions for women and children.
  3. Article 19 (1) (a): Provides the right to freedom of speech and expression to every citizen.
  4. Article 21A: Free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years shall be provided by the State.
  5. Article 23: Prohibits human trafficking and forced labour.
  6. Article 24: Prohibition of Child Labour and employment of children below 14 years in any other hazardous work.
  7. Article 39 (e): The State is empowered to ensure the health and strength of workers, men and women and the tender age of children are not abused or maltreated.
  8. Article 39 (f): The State shall ensure that children are given opportunities, facilities to develop in a healthy manner and conditions of freedom, dignity and be protected against exploitation and moral and material abandonment.
  9. Article 45: The State shall provide early childhood care and education to all children until they complete the age of six years.
  10. Article 51A-(k): Every parent or guardian must provide opportunities for education to his child between the age of six and fourteen years.[5]

Policies and Programmes

To ensure the welfare of children government implemented various policies and programmes such as:

  1. National Policy for Children, 1974: It is the first child centric programme launched by the government of India for all-round development, care and protection of children. It recognizes children and ensures that their rights, as enshrined in the constitution and the UN Declaration of Rights, are implemented.
  2. National Policy on Education, 1986: It led emphasis on equality in the sphere of educational opportunity. It involved a child-centred approach in primary education.
  3. National Policy on Child Labour, 1987: The government brought this policy to strictly implement the constitutional provisions to prohibit Child Labour and works towards the betterment of the conditions of working children.
  4. National Charter for Children, 2003: This comprehensive document empowers children with the right of being a child and enjoying their childhood to their fullest.  It secures the right to proper education and other facilities that would lead them to become a good and productive citizen of the nation. For the growth of every child, it enjoins the State, the society, the community and the families to develop a healthy, safe and positive environment in the country.
  5. National Plan of Action for Children, 2005: It aims to solve the various problems of a child’s life. It is engaged in the prohibition of child marriage, abolition of female foeticide, female infanticide and securing the rights of children in situations of abuse, exploitation and neglect.
  6. National Institute of Public Cooperation and Child Development: It is the organisation for documentation and compilation of research and initiative related to women and child development. It works in the areas of awareness against abuse and exploitation, rights of the children, child care support and development.

The Twelfth Five Year Plan, 2012 mainly focused on child development. It was a major step taken by the government towards increasing the status and condition of children especially the female child. In case of emergency, to help children child-line services have been launched. It is run by Childline India Foundation, the mother organization for this scheme in the country.[6]

Acts and Amendments

The government has enacted several laws to establish institutions and norms to enhance the rights of the children.

  1. Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 – This act led to the establishment of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) in the year 2007. NCPCR is a statutory body working under the Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India. It is preserving the rights of children, spreading awareness against child abuse, and provides children with proper redressal and rehabilitation in case of violation of their rights.
  2. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012 – It was enacted to deal with cases of child abuse, sexual assault, sexual harassment and other related offences. The POCSO cell has been set up to monitor the implementation of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 by the NCPCR. This act also provides for the establishment of a special court focusing on the needs and interests of the children at paramount importance.[7]

Reforms

Child Abuse is a grave issue that has long-term effects on the victim. Government should take significant reforms and in the prevention of existing legal and social apparatus as well as emphasize on improving the mental and emotional condition of children who are maltreated or abused. The economic conditions of the families should be strengthened as poverty is one of the major causes of child abuse. Sexual education should be provided in the schools and install grievance redressal system in schools and colleges such as complaint and suggestion boxes for a speedy solution to the issues of children. Student clubs should be established by the government and private schools to spread awareness against child abuse and policies of the government. Police and administrative bodies should be easily accessible to children and workshops should be conducted for children at the local levels. Institutes such as NCPCR should improve their reach and work on the implementation of policies on the ground level. The children must be educated about Child Protection schemes and ChildLine Services. The laws should be strengthened and implemented effectively.

Conclusion

Child abuse not only harms the child’s productivity but also detriment the process of socialization of the child. All the children have the right to live with dignity and in a safe environment. This could be achieved by creating awareness of their rights, especially their right to protection, enacting and implementing laws to punish the abuser. Therefore, it is required that society take steps to protect and enhance their childhood. This would allow greater participation in the process of innovation and evolution.

Bibliography

  1. Amisha U. Pathak, Child Abuse in India – An Analysis.
  2. Child Abuse and Neglect, https://www.healthychildren.org/English/safety-prevention/at-home/Pages/What-to-Know-about-Child-Abuse.aspx.
  3. Child Protection Law and Policy: India, https://www.loc.gov/law/help/child-protection-law/india.php.
  4. Child Protection, UNICEF India, https://www.unicef.org/india/what-we-do/child-protection.
  5. Provision related to children in “Constitution of India”, https://centreforchildprotection.org.
  6. Understanding Child Abuse and Importance of Child Protection https://www.savethechildren.in/child-protection/understanding-child-abuse-and-importance-of-child-protection/.
  7. What causes child abuse, https://www.qld.gov.au/community/getting-support-health-social-issue/support-victims-abuse/child-abuse/child-abuse-causes\.

  1. [1]Amisha U. Pathak, Child Abuse in India An Analysis.
  1. [2]What causes child abuse, https://www.qld.gov.au/community/getting-support-health-social-issue/support-victims-abuse/child-abuse/child-abuse-causes\.
  1. [3] What is child abuse? – Citizens Advice https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/family/children-and-young-people/child-abuse/what-is-child-abuse/what-is-child-abuse/.
  1. [4]Child Abuse and Neglect https://www.healthychildren.org/English/safety-prevention/at-home/Pages/What-to-Know-about-Child-Abuse.aspx.
  1. [5]Provision related to children in “Constitution of India”, https://centreforchildprotection.org.
  1. [6]Amisha U. Pathak, Child Abuse in India An Analysis .
  1. [7]Child Protection Law and Policy: India https://www.loc.gov/law/help/child-protection-law/india.php.

Latest Posts


Archives